Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)

Realidade Aumentada. O Asus ZenFone AR combina Realidade Aumentada com Realidade Virtual: é, afinal, o primeiro smartphone já certificado para o Google Tango e o Daydream. A questão mais interessante é se os recursos RA e RV justificam seu alto preço de aproximadamente $770.
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Zenfone Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 4 x 2.4 GHz, Kryo
Placa gráfica
Memória
6 GB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
5.70 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 515 PPI, capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 4, 10-finger multitouch, cobertura de espaço de cores de mais de 100% NTSC, 79% screen-to-body ratio, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões Micro-SD de até 2 TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, bússola eletrônica, sensor de proximidade, sensor de luz ambiente, hall effect sensor, sensor RGB, sensor IV (auto foco laser), leitor de digitais, barômetro, Wi-Fi Direct, Quick Charge 3.0, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1,800/​1,900 MHz), UMTS (800, 850, 900, 1,900, 2,100 MHz), LTE Cat.11 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41), Downloads up to 600 MBit/s, Uploads up to 75 MBit/s, SAR 0.85 W/Kg (head), 59 W/kg (body), Nano-SIM, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.95 x 158.7 x 77.7
Bateria
3300 mAh Lítio-Ion, BoostMaster quick charge: 60 % de carga em 39 minutos (18 W) segundo o fabricante
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 23 MPix Sony IMX318, 1.0 µm pixel size, f/2.0 aperture, 27 mm focal length, 6-element lense, 4-way optical image stabilization (OIS), 3-way electronic image stabilization (EIS), dual LED dual-color flash, 4K video recording at 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix OmniVision 8856, 1,12 µm pixel size, f/2.0 aperture, display flash
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: virtual, charger (9V, 2A), USB C cable, USB C to USB A (2.0) adapter, headphones, documentation (quick start guide, warranty booklet), ASUS ZenUI 3.0, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
170 g, Suprimento de energia: 40 g
Preço
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)

Size Comparison

179.8 mm 88.6 mm 10.7 mm 259 g158.7 mm 77.7 mm 8.95 mm 170 g154.2 mm 74.1 mm 7.25 mm 153 g148.9 mm 68.1 mm 8 mm 155 g148.9 mm 71.9 mm 7.9 mm 163 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s +118%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s +80%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
354 MBit/s +18%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
Adreno 530, SD 821, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
299 MBit/s
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 64 GB eMMC Flash
261 MBit/s -13%
LG G6
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s -26%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
915 MBit/s +169%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s +9%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
Adreno 530, SD 821, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
340 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 MBit/s -3%
LG G6
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s -4%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 64 GB eMMC Flash
313 MBit/s -8%
Asus ZenFone AR: overview
Asus ZenFone AR: overview
Asus ZenFone AR: overpass
Asus ZenFone AR: overpass
Asus ZenFone AR: turning point
Asus ZenFone AR: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overpass
Garmin Edge 500: overpass
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
362
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 362 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 340.9 cd/m² Minimum: 7.06 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 338 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.25
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.70
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
IPS, 2560x1440, 6.40
Apple iPhone 8
IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.70
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.70
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.80
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
Screen
-18%
59%
20%
39%
38%
Brightness middle
338
472.4
40%
604
79%
646
91%
566
67%
426
26%
Brightness
341
479
40%
580
70%
611
79%
564
65%
431
26%
Brightness Distribution
90
93
3%
91
1%
89
-1%
94
4%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.482
0.44
0.23
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.7
7
-89%
1.2
68%
4.5
-22%
2.7
27%
1.6
57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.9
11
-39%
2.3
71%
8.3
-5%
5.4
32%
4.1
48%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
7.9
-61%
1.6
67%
6
-22%
3.1
37%
1.7
65%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.34 94%
2.25 98%
2.27 97%
2.15 102%
2.25 98%
CCT
7286 89%
7826 83%
6688 97%
7996 81%
6335 103%
6329 103%
Contrast
980
1373
2809
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.74
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.05
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 231.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 231.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 231.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
150228 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
85438 Points -43%
Apple iPhone 8
204270 Points +36%
LG G6
151751 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
171884 Points +14%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points +18%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
6318 Points
LG G6
5703 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points -4%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points +24%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
5972 Points
LG G6
5152 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points -10%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points +10%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2315 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1626 Points -30%
LG G6
2496 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points +42%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points +64%
System (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3220 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
2297 Points -29%
LG G6
3646 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points +67%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points +83%
Memory (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1948 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1940 Points 0%
LG G6
1930 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points +56%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points +127%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4649 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1623 Points -65%
LG G6
5138 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points +31%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points +32%
Web (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
985 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
966 Points -2%
LG G6
1073 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points +17%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points +31%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1891 Points
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points +120%
LG G6
1831 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points +6%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points +4%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4359 Points
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points +138%
LG G6
4369 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points +54%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points +56%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG G6
7080 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8
8490 Points
OnePlus 5
8005 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
30658 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
17727 Points -42%
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points +102%
LG G6
29276 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points +3%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points +31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
34038 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
21103 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points +230%
LG G6
32128 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points +7%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points +70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
22750 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
11364 Points -50%
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points +6%
LG G6
22335 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points -5%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3249 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1365 Points -58%
LG G6
3282 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points +24%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4354 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1271 Points -71%
LG G6
4121 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points +13%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1721 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1844 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 8
1774 Points +3%
LG G6
1961 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points +42%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points +75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2466 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
877 Points -64%
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points -2%
LG G6
2669 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points +30%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points +45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2767 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
755 Points -73%
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points -7%
LG G6
2980 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points +25%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1787 Points
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
2014 Points +13%
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points +11%
LG G6
1955 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points +40%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points +69%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
51 fps
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
33 fps -35%
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps +135%
LG G6
46 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S8
60 fps +18%
OnePlus 5
60 fps +18%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
87 fps
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
22 fps -75%
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps +85%
LG G6
75 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S8
121 fps +39%
OnePlus 5
115 fps +32%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
28 fps
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
8.6 fps -69%
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps +309%
LG G6
27 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8
41 fps +46%
OnePlus 5
56 fps +100%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
45 fps
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
14 fps -69%
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps +57%
LG G6
38 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S8
62 fps +38%
OnePlus 5
61 fps +36%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
15 fps
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
4.7 fps -69%
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps +631%
LG G6
16 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S8
23 fps +53%
OnePlus 5
41 fps +173%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
16 fps
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
9.2 fps -42%
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps +238%
LG G6
29 fps +81%
Samsung Galaxy S8
24 fps +50%
OnePlus 5
42 fps +163%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
11 fps
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
5.4 fps -51%
LG G6
11 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps +18%
OnePlus 5
25 fps +127%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
19 fps
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
3.2 fps -83%
LG G6
20 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps +32%
OnePlus 5
25 fps +32%

Legend

 
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points +263%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
65.8 Points +16%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
56.9 Points
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
56.6 Points -1%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
50.7 Points -11%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points +246%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
12941 Points +31%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points +21%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
9863 Points
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
9113 Points -8%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
8837 Points -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
3598 ms * -48%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2622 ms * -8%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
2464 ms * -2%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
2423 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
1887 ms * +22%
Apple iPhone 8
731 ms * +70%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points +153%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
194 Points +37%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points +13%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
142 Points
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
122 Points -14%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
111 Points -22%

* ... smaller is better

Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KLLenovo Phab 2 ProLG G6Samsung Galaxy S8OnePlus 5
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
-2%
21%
52%
Sequential Read 256KB
458.9
255
-44%
428.7
-7%
793
73%
748
63%
Sequential Write 256KB
142.8
138
-3%
122.8
-14%
193.2
35%
201.5
41%
Random Read 4KB
88.4
38.53
-56%
95.2
8%
127.2
44%
141
60%
Random Write 4KB
13.51
12.92
-4%
16.58
23%
15.25
13%
19.3
43%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-14%
77.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
63.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-23%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
53.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
53.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high56 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Carga Máxima
 37.1 °C36.5 °C33.6 °C 
 37.8 °C37.6 °C32.7 °C 
 35.8 °C35.2 °C32.5 °C 
Máximo: 37.8 °C
Médio: 35.4 °C
31.8 °C34.2 °C36 °C
31.9 °C34.5 °C37.9 °C
30.3 °C36.6 °C35.1 °C
Máximo: 37.9 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  25.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.241.62532.941.13137.240.34031.736.25039.636.56328.336.28027.334.510026.931.512526.731.71602439.320020.947.325020.951.231519.55940018.559.850017.563.263017.560.680015.762.3100015.868.8125016.669.4160015.868200015.468.5250015.570.931501672.6400015.87550001684.3630016.381.6800016.376.81000016.275.41250016.474.11600016.455.6SPL28.688.4N1.165median 16.4median 68Delta2.28.637.636.234.835.333.734.333.933.833.333.531.331.232.230.629.72930.631.127.441.326.850.42654.824.858.323.960.923.464.422.768.622.46722.667.92267.121.763.821.563.821.26821.172.120.978.220.978.32172.72171.121.272.32168.421.257.73484.52.256.8median 22median 671.96.231.639.125.437.625.336.932.940.833.635.231.633.328.433.82733.520.842.82250.821.351.520.849.821.253.919.45619.558.717.761.617.962.917.866.217.368.217.468.416.768.517.267.318.26817.969.817.668.817.767.517.861.717.959.118.160.618.256.23078.41.343.6median 17.9median 61.61.48hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenFone AR ZS571KLLenovo Phab 2 ProApple iPhone 8
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Phab 2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.04 / 0.31 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.88 / 1.24 / 1.26 Watt
Carga midlight 7.71 / 8.64 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3300 mAh
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
4050 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Power Consumption
-147%
10%
1%
23%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
0.88
3
-241%
0.54
39%
0.62
30%
0.78
11%
0.73
17%
Idle Average *
1.24
4.1
-231%
1.63
-31%
1.43
-15%
1.1
11%
1.44
-16%
Idle Maximum *
1.26
4.2
-233%
1.67
-33%
1.48
-17%
1.16
8%
1.5
-19%
Load Average *
7.71
10.4
-35%
2.74
64%
5.52
28%
4.15
46%
6.91
10%
Load Maximum *
8.64
8.1
6%
7.78
10%
10.47
-21%
5.12
41%
8.51
2%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 36min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 36min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 41min
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3300 mAh
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
4050 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
11%
28%
29%
8%
Reader / Idle
1476
1119
-24%
1629
10%
1789
21%
1667
13%
1534
4%
H.264
636
567
-11%
698
10%
779
22%
771
21%
623
-2%
WiFi v1.3
444
508
14%
585
32%
692
56%
719
62%
518
17%
Load
221
190
-14%
202
-9%
252
14%
264
19%
247
12%

Pro

+ Compatível com RA e RV
+ Carcaça resistente e de alta qualidade
+ Veloz armazenamento UFS 2.0
+ LTE Cat. 11
+ Tela OLED WQHD
+ Boa câmera
+ Alto desempenho

Contra

- Muito caro
- Apenas alguns aplicativos Tango disponíveis
- Sem Slot Dual-SIM híbrido
- Curta duração da bateria
In review: Asus ZenFone AR. Review unit courtesy of Asus Germany.
In review: Asus ZenFone AR. Review unit courtesy of Asus Germany.

Sem dúvida: o ZenFone AR é o primeiro smartphone em rodar fluentemente os aplicativos de realidade aumentada do Google Tango. No entanto, dada a seleção relativamente escassa de aplicativos (cerca de 30) - a maioria dos quais são truques para inicializar - em seu estado atual, Tango está longe de ser um recurso imprescindível. A questão é: você está disposto a gastar quase $800 mais impostos por esta experiência de RA bastante pobre? Suspeitamos que, para a maioria dos usuários, o Tango não será um fator importante ao considerar o ZenFone AR, especialmente porque os óculos Daydream de RV do Google não estão incluídos e devem ser comprados separadamente.

Comprar o ZenFone AR apenas por causa do Google Tango não vai valer a pena. Deixando a realidade aumentada de lado, o que resta é um smartphone decente, mas caro.

Com quase a metade do preço, o LG G6 é quase tão veloz quanto o ZenFone AR. Nem mesmo a TriCam da Asus foi capaz de impressionar-nos. Sim, as fotos resultantes são certamente decentes, mas estão longe de ser as melhores. Além disso, a duração da bateria é muito fraca e o ZenFone AR fica sem energia comparativamente rápido.

No final do dia, o Asus ZenFone AR é um smartphone bem feito e de alta qualidade com tela OLED WEDHD, que tem um desempenho mais que adequado para aplicativos e jogos comuns e módulos de comunicação muito rápidos.

Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL - 11/02/2017 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
72 / 75 → 95%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
48 / 60 → 79%
Peso
91%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 63 → 95%
Desempenho da aplicação
61 / 70 → 87%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
82%
Médio
79%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Manuel Masiero, 2017-11-12 (Update: 2017-11-23)