Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC 10

Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/27/2016

Retorno bem-sucedido! Após o HTC One M9 que não cumpriu com as expectativas no ano passado, a HTC tem feito muitas melhorias e agora oferece um ótimo smartphone premium com uma boa câmera.

HTC 10 (10 Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Análises do: 624 MHz
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
5.2 polegadas 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 565 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, 10 pontos multi-touch, Super LCD 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.08 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector combinas de fones / microfone de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Micro-SD máx. 2 TB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de proximidade, sensor de rotação, acelerômetro e sensor G, bússola digital, sensor hub, BeiDou, Miracast, Wifi Direct, DLNA, AirPlay
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 9 (band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40 and 41), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.0 x 145.9 x 71.9
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Ion, Quick Charge 3.0, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 27 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 456 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (UltraPixel 2 com 1,55 μm pixels, auto foco laser, sensor BSI, OIS, f/1.8, 26 mm, auto HDR, vídeo UHD)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (auto foco, 1.34 μm pixels, auto HDR, OIS)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: dois alto falantes, Teclado: virtual, carregador rápido modular, cabo USB, headset de áudio Hi-Res, HTC Hilfe, Boost+, Themes, 24 Meses Garantia, HTC BoomSound Hi-Fi Edition, Dolby Audio, Hi-Res audio certified, trés microfones com supressão de ruído, USB 3.1 Gen 1, Type-C, head SAR: 0.417 W/kg, body SAR: 0,174 W/kg, fanless
peso
161 g, Suprimento de energia: 90 g
Preço
699 Euro

 

Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
HTC 10
HTC 10
HTC 10
HTC 10
HTC 10
HTC 10

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
432
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 445 cd/m² Médio: 433.7 cd/m² Minimum: 8.25 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 445 cd/m²
Contraste: 1236:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.31
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2
HTC One M9
Super LCD 3, 1920x1080, 5
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
LG G5
IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2
Motorola Moto X Force
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.4
Screen
-36%
-5%
30%
-24%
-7%
-3%
Brightness
434
458
6%
560
29%
552
27%
774
78%
563
30%
336
-23%
Brightness Distribution
93
85
-9%
91
-2%
96
3%
91
-2%
91
-2%
91
-2%
Black Level *
0.36
0.4
-11%
0.46
-28%
0.43
-19%
0.38
-6%
Contrast
1236
1185
-4%
1267
3%
1823
47%
1532
24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.8
6.32
-126%
3.55
-27%
1.59
43%
6.5
-132%
4.4
-57%
3.99
-43%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.7
6.36
-72%
3.88
-5%
2.01
46%
8
-116%
4.8
-30%
1.66
55%
Gamma
2.31 104%
2.43 99%
2.2 109%
2.01 119%
2.22 108%
2.2 109%
2.32 103%
CCT
7164 91%
8218 79%
7280 89%
6321 103%
8699 75%
6175 105%
6584 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58.81
59.05
82.12
68.08
77.78
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92.8
99.98
97.46
99.44

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6668 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC 10
131866 Points ∼58%
HTC One M9
85487 Points ∼37% -35%
LG G5
124244 Points ∼54% -6%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
133626 Points ∼59% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼56% -2%
Huawei P9
95743 Points ∼42% -27%
Huawei Mate 8
93767 Points ∼41% -29%
Google Nexus 6P
79502 Points ∼35% -40%
Motorola Moto X Force
89911 Points ∼39% -32%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
78324 Points ∼34% -41%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC 10
5809 Points ∼70%
HTC One M9
4193 Points ∼51% -28%
LG G5
5581 Points ∼67% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼56% -20%
Huawei P9
7058 Points ∼85% +22%
Huawei Mate 8
7344 Points ∼89% +26%
Google Nexus 6P
4716 Points ∼57% -19%
Motorola Moto X Force
5365 Points ∼65% -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5094 Points ∼61% -12%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC 10
5117 Points ∼14%
HTC One M9
3835 Points ∼10% -25%
LG G5
5507 Points ∼15% +8%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4429 Points ∼12% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6480 (min: 6415) Points ∼17% +27%
Huawei P9
6522 Points ∼17% +27%
Huawei Mate 8
6265 Points ∼17% +22%
Google Nexus 6P
4587 Points ∼12% -10%
Motorola Moto X Force
4791 Points ∼13% -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
4492 Points ∼12% -12%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC 10
2376 Points ∼50%
HTC One M9
1275 Points ∼27% -46%
LG G5
2396 Points ∼50% +1%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2538 Points ∼53% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2170 (min: 2120) Points ∼46% -9%
Huawei P9
1767 Points ∼37% -26%
Huawei Mate 8
1721 Points ∼36% -28%
Google Nexus 6P
1335 Points ∼28% -44%
Motorola Moto X Force
1262 Points ∼27% -47%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1335 Points ∼28% -44%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
HTC 10
1688 Points ∼56%
HTC One M9
1132 Points ∼37% -33%
LG G5
1723 Points ∼57% +2%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1676 Points ∼55% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (min: 1594) Points ∼70% +26%
Huawei P9
2503 Points ∼83% +48%
Huawei Mate 8
2552 Points ∼84% +51%
Google Nexus 6P
1317 Points ∼44% -22%
Motorola Moto X Force
1351 Points ∼45% -20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1402 Points ∼46% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
HTC 10
2889 Points ∼54%
HTC One M9
1084 Points ∼20% -62%
LG G5
2833 Points ∼53% -2%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2601 Points ∼48% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (min: 2043) Points ∼41% -23%
Huawei P9
829 Points ∼15% -71%
Huawei Mate 8
801 Points ∼15% -72%
Google Nexus 6P
1589 Points ∼30% -45%
Motorola Moto X Force
2067 Points ∼38% -28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1074 Points ∼20% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
HTC 10
2495 Points ∼64%
HTC One M9
1094 Points ∼28% -56%
LG G5
2478 Points ∼64% -1%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2318 Points ∼60% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (min: 1923) Points ∼57% -12%
Huawei P9
974 Points ∼25% -61%
Huawei Mate 8
945 Points ∼24% -62%
Google Nexus 6P
1519 Points ∼39% -39%
Motorola Moto X Force
1849 Points ∼48% -26%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1132 Points ∼29% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
HTC 10
1512 Points ∼50%
HTC One M9
845 Points ∼28% -44%
LG G5
1695 Points ∼56% +12%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1697 Points ∼56% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼66% +32%
Huawei P9
2510 Points ∼83% +66%
Huawei Mate 8
2432 Points ∼81% +61%
Google Nexus 6P
1142 Points ∼38% -24%
Motorola Moto X Force
1282 Points ∼43% -15%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1348 Points ∼45% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
HTC 10
4581 Points ∼59%
HTC One M9
1892 Points ∼24% -59%
LG G5
4468 Points ∼58% -2%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4557 Points ∼59% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼39% -34%
Huawei P9
1080 Points ∼14% -76%
Huawei Mate 8
1092 Points ∼14% -76%
Google Nexus 6P
2302 Points ∼30% -50%
Motorola Moto X Force
3226 Points ∼42% -30%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2336 Points ∼30% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
HTC 10
3157 Points ∼63%
HTC One M9
1484 Points ∼30% -53%
LG G5
3277 Points ∼66% +4%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3316 Points ∼67% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼54% -14%
Huawei P9
1237 Points ∼25% -61%
Huawei Mate 8
1244 Points ∼25% -61%
Google Nexus 6P
1877 Points ∼38% -41%
Motorola Moto X Force
2413 Points ∼48% -24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2009 Points ∼40% -36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC 10
20344 Points ∼28%
HTC One M9
10432 (min: 10432) Points ∼14% -49%
LG G5
20997 Points ∼29% +3%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
12854 Points ∼18% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼27% -4%
Huawei P9
15517 Points ∼22% -24%
Huawei Mate 8
15575 Points ∼22% -23%
Google Nexus 6P
14983 Points ∼21% -26%
Motorola Moto X Force
11963 Points ∼17% -41%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
12852 Points ∼18% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC 10
30061 Points ∼7%
HTC One M9
34429 (min: 34429) Points ∼8% +15%
LG G5
32109 Points ∼7% +7%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
41615 Points ∼9% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼7% +10%
Huawei P9
21577 Points ∼5% -28%
Huawei Mate 8
20537 Points ∼5% -32%
Google Nexus 6P
34758 Points ∼8% +16%
Motorola Moto X Force
38394 Points ∼8% +28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
37725 Points ∼8% +25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC 10
27176 Points ∼14%
HTC One M9
22783 (min: 22783) Points ∼12% -16%
LG G5
28730 Points ∼15% +6%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
27795 Points ∼14% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼15% +6%
Huawei P9
19854 Points ∼10% -27%
Huawei Mate 8
19179 Points ∼10% -29%
Google Nexus 6P
26876 Points ∼14% -1%
Motorola Moto X Force
25751 Points ∼13% -5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
26380 Points ∼13% -3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC 10
73 fps ∼6%
HTC One M9
49 fps ∼4% -33%
LG G5
74 fps ∼6% +1%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
78.9 fps ∼6% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼6% +11%
Huawei P9
40 fps ∼3% -45%
Huawei Mate 8
41 fps ∼3% -44%
Google Nexus 6P
44 fps ∼3% -40%
Motorola Moto X Force
58 fps ∼4% -21%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
56 fps ∼4% -23%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC 10
43 fps ∼9%
HTC One M9
50 fps ∼11% +16%
LG G5
47 fps ∼10% +9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
59 fps ∼13% +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼11% +19%
Huawei P9
43 fps ∼9% 0%
Huawei Mate 8
44 fps ∼10% +2%
Google Nexus 6P
33 fps ∼7% -23%
Motorola Moto X Force
42 fps ∼9% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
52 fps ∼11% +21%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC 10
39 fps ∼7%
HTC One M9
23 fps ∼4% -41%
LG G5
42 fps ∼8% +8%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps ∼7% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼7% -3%
Huawei P9
18 fps ∼3% -54%
Huawei Mate 8
18 fps ∼3% -54%
Google Nexus 6P
25 fps ∼5% -36%
Motorola Moto X Force
27 fps ∼5% -31%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
25 fps ∼5% -36%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC 10
24 fps ∼7%
HTC One M9
24 fps ∼7% 0%
LG G5
30 fps ∼8% +25%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps ∼11% +60%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼7% +13%
Huawei P9
19 fps ∼5% -21%
Huawei Mate 8
19 fps ∼5% -21%
Google Nexus 6P
17 fps ∼5% -29%
Motorola Moto X Force
17 fps ∼5% -29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
27 fps ∼7% +13%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC 10
24 fps ∼6%
HTC One M9
16 fps ∼4% -33%
LG G5
31 fps ∼7% +29%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps ∼7% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼7% +17%
Huawei P9
10 fps ∼2% -58%
Huawei Mate 8
10 fps ∼2% -58%
Google Nexus 6P
16 fps ∼4% -33%
Motorola Moto X Force
20 fps ∼5% -17%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
18 fps ∼4% -25%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC 10
14 fps ∼8%
HTC One M9
17 fps ∼10% +21%
LG G5
17 fps ∼10% +21%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps ∼16% +100%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼9% +7%
Huawei P9
11 fps ∼6% -21%
Huawei Mate 8
11 fps ∼6% -21%
Google Nexus 6P
9.5 fps ∼5% -32%
Motorola Moto X Force
12 fps ∼7% -14%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
19 fps ∼11% +36%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC 10
18 fps ∼5%
HTC One M9
11 fps ∼3% -39%
LG G5
18 fps ∼5% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼4% -17%
Huawei P9
6.5 fps ∼2% -64%
Huawei Mate 8
6.2 fps ∼2% -66%
Motorola Moto X Force
12 fps ∼3% -33%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5.8 fps ∼2% -68%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC 10
10 fps ∼0%
HTC One M9
12 fps ∼0% +20%
LG G5
11 fps ∼0% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps ∼0% -21%
Huawei P9
7.1 fps ∼0% -29%
Huawei Mate 8
6.7 fps ∼0% -33%
Motorola Moto X Force
7.3 fps ∼0% -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
6.1 fps ∼0% -39%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
HTC 10
928 Points ∼60%
HTC One M9
789 Points ∼51% -15%
LG G5
900 Points ∼58% -3%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1199 Points ∼78% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼64% +7%
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼67% +11%
Huawei Mate 8
1127 Points ∼73% +21%
Google Nexus 6P
791 Points ∼51% -15%
Motorola Moto X Force
939 Points ∼61% +1%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
986 Points ∼64% +6%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC 10
5009 Points ∼58%
HTC One M9
3210 Points ∼37% -36%
LG G5
4807 Points ∼56% -4%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4299 Points ∼50% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼26% -56%
Huawei P9
1583 Points ∼18% -68%
Huawei Mate 8
1636 Points ∼19% -67%
Google Nexus 6P
2424 Points ∼28% -52%
Motorola Moto X Force
3376 Points ∼39% -33%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
3137 Points ∼36% -37%
Memory (sort by value)
HTC 10
1772 Points ∼40%
HTC One M9
933 Points ∼21% -47%
LG G5
1478 Points ∼33% -17%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1124 Points ∼25% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼47% +17%
Huawei P9
2627 Points ∼59% +48%
Huawei Mate 8
2339 Points ∼53% +32%
Google Nexus 6P
1136 Points ∼26% -36%
Motorola Moto X Force
1085 Points ∼25% -39%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
876 Points ∼20% -51%
System (sort by value)
HTC 10
2806 Points ∼43%
HTC One M9
1672 Points ∼25% -40%
LG G5
2925 Points ∼44% +4%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3925 Points ∼60% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼62% +45%
Huawei P9
3930 Points ∼60% +40%
Huawei Mate 8
4064 Points ∼62% +45%
Google Nexus 6P
1798 Points ∼27% -36%
Motorola Moto X Force
2878 Points ∼44% +3%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2737 Points ∼42% -2%
Overall (sort by value)
HTC 10
2193 Points ∼58%
HTC One M9
1410 Points ∼37% -36%
LG G5
2079 Points ∼55% -5%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2206 Points ∼58% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼55% -5%
Huawei P9
2025 Points ∼53% -8%
Huawei Mate 8
2046 Points ∼54% -7%
Google Nexus 6P
1405 Points ∼37% -36%
Motorola Moto X Force
1774 Points ∼47% -19%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1649 Points ∼44% -25%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
HTC 10
608 Points ∼32%
HTC One M9
300 Points ∼16% -51%
LG G5
543 Points ∼29% -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
858 Points ∼46% +41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points ∼39% +21%
Huawei P9
328 Points ∼18% -46%
Huawei Mate 8
347 Points ∼19% -43%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
478 Points ∼26% -21%

Legend

 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC One M9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto X Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
HTC 10
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 Points ∼14%
HTC One M9
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
72 Points ∼10% -33%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 Points ∼14% 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
190 Points ∼25% +76%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
163 Points ∼22% +51%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
128 Points ∼17% +19%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
139 Points ∼18% +29%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
116 Points ∼15% +7%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
103 Points ∼14% -5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
106 Points ∼14% -2%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC 10
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8905 Points ∼18%
HTC One M9
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6493 Points ∼13% -27%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9731 Points ∼20% +9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
15967 Points ∼32% +79%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13191 Points ∼27% +48%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11783 Points ∼24% +32%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11329 Points ∼23% +27%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8804 Points ∼18% -1%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8699 Points ∼18% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8851 Points ∼18% -1%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC 10
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3146.3 ms * ∼5%
HTC One M9
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6508.2 ms * ∼11% -107%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3461.1 ms * ∼6% -10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1743 ms * ∼3% +45%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2564.1 ms * ∼4% +19%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2922.6 ms * ∼5% +7%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3643 ms * ∼6% -16%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4193 ms * ∼7% -33%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4080.1 ms * ∼7% -30%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4377.1 ms * ∼7% -39%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
HTC 10
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.1 Points ∼16%
HTC One M9
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26.852 Points ∼8% -48%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.7 Points ∼15% -5%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
118.7 Points ∼36% +128%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
75.12 Points ∼23% +44%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
68.4 Points ∼20% +31%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
65 Points ∼19% +25%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 Points ∼14% -9%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.373 Points ∼15% -5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48.2 Points ∼14% -7%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC 10
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
65.44 MB/s ∼75%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45.53 MB/s ∼52% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
50.36 MB/s ∼58% -23%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.83 MB/s ∼28% -62%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.96 MB/s ∼54% -28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC 10
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
83.3 MB/s ∼86%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
78.53 MB/s ∼81% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
76.43 MB/s ∼79% -8%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.05 MB/s ∼57% -34%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79.04 MB/s ∼82% -5%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
HTC 10
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15.89 MB/s ∼10%
HTC One M9
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
13.91 MB/s ∼9% -12%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
16.22 MB/s ∼11% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15.79 MB/s ∼10% -1%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.45 MB/s ∼31% +199%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15.74 MB/s ∼10% -1%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.79 MB/s ∼8% -26%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19.78 MB/s ∼13% +24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14.53 MB/s ∼10% -9%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
HTC 10
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29.92 MB/s ∼17%
HTC One M9
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20.66 MB/s ∼12% -31%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
89.26 MB/s ∼52% +198%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
86.71 MB/s ∼50% +190%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39 MB/s ∼23% +30%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.98 MB/s ∼14% -17%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20.1 MB/s ∼12% -33%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
22.55 MB/s ∼13% -25%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19.11 MB/s ∼11% -36%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
HTC 10
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
115.56 MB/s ∼56%
HTC One M9
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
123.81 MB/s ∼60% +7%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
141.26 MB/s ∼68% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
145.11 MB/s ∼70% +26%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
72.19 MB/s ∼35% -38%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
124.78 MB/s ∼60% +8%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
122.51 MB/s ∼59% +6%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.99 MB/s ∼23% -58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
99.4 MB/s ∼48% -14%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
HTC 10
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
275.09 MB/s ∼35%
HTC One M9
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
235.14 MB/s ∼30% -15%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
427.65 MB/s ∼54% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
487.34 MB/s ∼61% +77%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
281.26 MB/s ∼35% +2%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
238.28 MB/s ∼30% -13%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
236.33 MB/s ∼30% -14%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
252.03 MB/s ∼32% -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
256.75 MB/s ∼32% -7%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high48 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 39.3 °C39.2 °C41 °C 
 39 °C39.8 °C42 °C 
 38.6 °C39.3 °C37.7 °C 
Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 39.5 °C
39.4 °C39.7 °C39.3 °C
38.5 °C39.6 °C39.2 °C
38.3 °C39 °C38.3 °C
Máximo: 39.7 °C
Médio: 39 °C
alimentação elétrica  29.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Pink Noise: HTC 10
Pink Noise: HTC 10
Pink Noise: HTC One M9
Pink Noise: HTC One M9
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.27 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.68 / 1.49 / 1.91 Watt
Carga midlight 7.4 / 9.71 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
21h 13min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
6h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 48min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 23min
HTC 10
3000 mAh
HTC One M9
 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Google Nexus 6P
3450 mAh
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
3430 mAh
Motorola Moto X Force
3760 mAh
Battery Runtime
-18%
16%
12%
61%
6%
-11%
26%
Reader / Idle
1273
805
-37%
1833
44%
1514
19%
1663
31%
1447
14%
1277
0%
1610
26%
H.264
648
421
-35%
600
-7%
568
-12%
914
41%
533
-18%
411
-37%
710
10%
WiFi v1.3
413
348
-16%
387
-6%
569
38%
732
77%
375
-9%
372
-10%
426
3%
Load
203
236
16%
267
32%
206
1%
392
93%
280
38%
210
3%
330
63%
WiFi
573

Pro

+ Design de linhas simples
+ SoC veloz
+ Bons alto falantes
+ Configuração extensível
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ Slot Micro-SD veloz
+ USB Type-C 3.1 gen. 1
+ Belo painel
+ Boa câmera
+ Headset excelente

Contra

- Sem infravermelhos
- Sem receptor de rádio
- Afogamento do SoC sob uso intenso
- Alto consumo de energia no modo inativo quando habilita os módulos de rádio
In review: HTC 10. Review sample courtesy of HTC Germany.
In review: HTC 10. Review sample courtesy of HTC Germany.

A HTC desenvolveu uma excelente peça de tecnologia com o seu novo smartphone top, que muitos não teriam esperado do fabricante. O smartphone brilha com a sua excelente tela, boa câmera, excelente configuração de interfaces e ótima qualidade de áudio.

O HTC 10 não apresenta grandes desvantagens. É uma pena que o transmissor de infravermelhos e o receptor de rádio estejam ausentes. Além disso, o afogamento do Snapdragon é perturbante, porém nada para fazer um drama. As durações poderiam ser um pouco melhores, mas ele conseguirá aguentar o dia todo para a maioria dos usuários.

HTC 10: Retorno atraente sem destaques.

Por isso não há muito espaço para reclamos. O design é definitivamente uma questão de gosto. Por outro lado, a construção é muito boa. Finalmente depende do comprador se a HTC terá sucesso com o seu smartphone. O smartphone é uma alternativa, de qualquer forma.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

HTC 10 - 05/09/2016 v5.1
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
91%
Teclado
71 / 75 → 94%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
60 / 60 → 100%
Peso
91%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 63 → 95%
Desempenho da aplicação
59 / 70 → 84%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
81%
Médio
80%
89%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC 10
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-05-27 (Update: 2016-05-30)