Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone LG G5

Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/19/2016

Modular com olhos grandes. O novo LG G5 vem com algumas inovações. O smartphone agora é modular e possui uma dual-câmera. Bem como as lentes convencionais, há uma lente de ângulo amplo adicional, mas infelizmente, a resolução é bastante baixa. A capacidade da bateria também foi reduzida.

Processador
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Análises do: 624 MHz
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
5.3 polegadas 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 554 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, multi-touch de 10 pontos, IPS Quantum, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.07 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone (3,5 mm), Card Reader: microSD de até 2 TB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Proximidade, Rotação, Acelerômetro e G-Sensor, sensores VR, bússola digital, barômetro, Android Beam, Wifi Direct, Miracast, SlimPort, OTG, DLNA, Infrared
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2 LE, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900 e 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38 e 40), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 149.4 x 73.9
Bateria
10.78 Wh, 2800 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, 3.85 Volt, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 29 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 21 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 400 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 400 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (ângulo padrão de 78° e ângulo amplo de 135°, f/1.8, HDR, Color Spectrum Sensor, Laser AF, OIS 2.0, suporte para RAW)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante mano, Teclado: virtual, Carregador rápido modular, cabo USB, headset, LG Backup, SmartWorld, QuickRemote, QuickMemo+, LG Health, LG Friends Manager, 24 Meses Garantia, USB Type-C, rádio FM, Head-SAR: 0,737 W/kg, fanless
peso
159 g, Suprimento de energia: 68 g
Preço
699 Euro

 

Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
LG G5
LG G5
LG G5
LG G5
LG G5
LG G5
Standard camera
Wide-angle camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Main camera
Wide-angle camera
Main camera
Wide-angle camera
774
cd/m²
809
cd/m²
749
cd/m²
734
cd/m²
784
cd/m²
781
cd/m²
740
cd/m²
789
cd/m²
803
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 809 cd/m² Médio: 773.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.93 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 784 cd/m²
Contraste: 1823:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 8 | - Ø
97.46% sRGB (Argyll) 68.08% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.22
LG G5
IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3, 16:9
LG G4
Quantum-IPS, 2560x1440, 5.5, 16:9
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5, 16:9
OnePlus 2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5, 16:9
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5, 16:9
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2, 16:9
Google Nexus 6P
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7, 16:9
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5, 16:9
Screen
-6%
-20%
5%
2%
7%
24%
25%
Brightness
774
536
-31%
541
-30%
446
-42%
560
-28%
563
-27%
365
-53%
552
-29%
Brightness Distribution
91
90
-1%
85
-7%
90
-1%
91
0%
91
0%
90
-1%
96
5%
Black Level *
0.43
0.47
-9%
0.45
-5%
0.3
30%
0.46
-7%
0.38
12%
Contrast
1823
1204
-34%
1244
-32%
1503
-18%
1267
-30%
1532
-16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.5
6.17
5%
9.19
-41%
3.84
41%
3.55
45%
4.4
32%
2.34
64%
1.59
76%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8
6.26
22%
10.58
-32%
3.97
50%
3.88
51%
4.8
40%
1.03
87%
2.01
75%
Gamma
2.22 108%
2.48 97%
2.7 89%
2.46 98%
2.2 109%
2.2 109%
2.23 108%
2.01 119%
CCT
8699 75%
8171 80%
9760 67%
7283 89%
7280 89%
6175 105%
6429 101%
6321 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68.08
65.48
-4%
73.19
8%
58.07
-15%
59.05
-13%
77.78
14%
82.12
21%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.46
98.63
1%
90.14
-8%
92.8
-5%
99.44
2%
99.98
3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2273 Hz34 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2273 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 34 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2273 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4402 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G5
124244 Points ∼54%
Google Nexus 6P
79502 Points ∼35% -36%
Motorola Moto X Force (6.0.1)
89911 Points ∼39% -28%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (v6.0.5 UWP Beta5)
94122 Points ∼41% -24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
78324 Points ∼34% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼56% +4%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
133626 Points ∼59% +8%
OnePlus 2
65936 Points ∼29% -47%
Huawei P9
95743 Points ∼42% -23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
131327 Points ∼58% +6%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG G5
5507 Points ∼17%
LG G4
3556 Points ∼11% -35%
Google Nexus 6P
4587 Points ∼14% -17%
Motorola Moto X Force
4791 Points ∼15% -13%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
4492 Points ∼14% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6480 (min: 6415) Points ∼20% +18%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4429 Points ∼14% -20%
OnePlus 2
4804 Points ∼15% -13%
Huawei P9
6522 Points ∼20% +18%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
5500 Points ∼17% 0%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG G5
2396 Points ∼50%
LG G4
1107 Points ∼23% -54%
Google Nexus 6P
1335 Points ∼28% -44%
Motorola Moto X Force
1262 Points ∼27% -47%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1335 Points ∼28% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2170 (min: 2120) Points ∼46% -9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2538 Points ∼53% +6%
OnePlus 2
1140 Points ∼24% -52%
Huawei P9
1767 Points ∼37% -26%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2376 Points ∼50% -1%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG G5
5581 Points ∼67%
LG G4 (Android 5.1 Lillipop)
4579 Points ∼55% -18%
Google Nexus 6P
4716 Points ∼57% -15%
Motorola Moto X Force
5365 Points ∼65% -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5094 Points ∼61% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼56% -17%
OnePlus 2 (OxygenOS 2.0)
4282 Points ∼52% -23%
Huawei P9
7058 Points ∼85% +26%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
6590 Points ∼79% +18%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG G5
1723 Points ∼57%
LG G4
1216 Points ∼40% -29%
Google Nexus 6P
1317 Points ∼44% -24%
Motorola Moto X Force
1351 Points ∼45% -22%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1402 Points ∼47% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (min: 1594) Points ∼71% +23%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus (Metal)
1676 Points ∼56% -3%
OnePlus 2
1517 Points ∼50% -12%
Huawei P9
2503 Points ∼83% +45%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
1288 Points ∼43% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG G5
2833 Points ∼53%
LG G4
440 Points ∼8% -84%
Google Nexus 6P
1589 Points ∼30% -44%
Motorola Moto X Force
2067 Points ∼38% -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1074 Points ∼20% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (min: 2043) Points ∼41% -21%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus (Metal)
2601 Points ∼48% -8%
OnePlus 2
846 Points ∼16% -70%
Huawei P9
829 Points ∼15% -71%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2773 Points ∼52% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG G5
2478 Points ∼64%
LG G4
513 Points ∼13% -79%
Google Nexus 6P
1519 Points ∼39% -39%
Motorola Moto X Force
1849 Points ∼48% -25%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1132 Points ∼29% -54%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (min: 1923) Points ∼57% -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus (Metal)
2318 Points ∼60% -6%
OnePlus 2
938 Points ∼24% -62%
Huawei P9
974 Points ∼25% -61%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2207 Points ∼57% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG G5
1695 Points ∼58%
LG G4
1115 Points ∼38% -34%
Google Nexus 6P
1142 Points ∼39% -33%
Motorola Moto X Force
1282 Points ∼44% -24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1348 Points ∼46% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼69% +18%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1697 Points ∼58% 0%
OnePlus 2
1414 Points ∼48% -17%
Huawei P9
2510 Points ∼86% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG G5
4468 Points ∼58%
LG G4
1399 Points ∼18% -69%
Google Nexus 6P
2302 Points ∼30% -48%
Motorola Moto X Force
3226 Points ∼42% -28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2336 Points ∼30% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼39% -33%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4557 Points ∼59% +2%
OnePlus 2
1854 Points ∼24% -59%
Huawei P9
1080 Points ∼14% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG G5
3277 Points ∼66%
LG G4
1324 Points ∼27% -60%
Google Nexus 6P
1877 Points ∼38% -43%
Motorola Moto X Force
2413 Points ∼48% -26%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2009 Points ∼40% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼54% -17%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3316 Points ∼67% +1%
OnePlus 2
1734 Points ∼35% -47%
Huawei P9
1237 Points ∼25% -62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG G5
20997 Points ∼30%
LG G4
11178 Points ∼16% -47%
Google Nexus 6P
14983 Points ∼22% -29%
Motorola Moto X Force
11963 Points ∼17% -43%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
12852 Points ∼19% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼28% -7%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
12854 Points ∼19% -39%
OnePlus 2
10985 Points ∼16% -48%
Huawei P9
15517 Points ∼22% -26%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
14358 Points ∼21% -32%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG G5
32109 Points ∼7%
LG G4
23390 Points ∼5% -27%
Google Nexus 6P
34758 Points ∼8% +8%
Motorola Moto X Force
38394 Points ∼8% +20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
37725 Points ∼8% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼7% +3%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
41615 Points ∼9% +30%
OnePlus 2
31858 Points ∼7% -1%
Huawei P9
21577 Points ∼5% -33%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
30585 Points ∼7% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG G5
28730 Points ∼15%
LG G4
18821 Points ∼10% -34%
Google Nexus 6P
26876 Points ∼14% -6%
Motorola Moto X Force
25751 Points ∼13% -10%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
26380 Points ∼13% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼15% 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
27795 Points ∼14% -3%
OnePlus 2
22400 Points ∼11% -22%
Huawei P9
19854 Points ∼10% -31%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
24446 Points ∼12% -15%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG G5
74 fps ∼6%
LG G4
33.7 fps ∼3% -54%
Google Nexus 6P
44 fps ∼3% -41%
Motorola Moto X Force
58 fps ∼4% -22%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps ∼2% -63%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
56 fps ∼4% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼6% +9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
78.9 fps ∼6% +7%
OnePlus 2
48 fps ∼4% -35%
Huawei P9
40 fps ∼3% -46%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
91 fps ∼7% +23%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG G5
47 fps ∼10%
LG G4
24.9 fps ∼5% -47%
Google Nexus 6P
33 fps ∼7% -30%
Motorola Moto X Force
42 fps ∼9% -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps ∼4% -60%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
52 fps ∼11% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼11% +9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
59 fps ∼13% +26%
OnePlus 2
47 fps ∼10% 0%
Huawei P9
43 fps ∼9% -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
56 fps ∼12% +19%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG G5
42 fps ∼8%
LG G4
15 fps ∼3% -64%
Google Nexus 6P
25 fps ∼5% -40%
Motorola Moto X Force
27 fps ∼5% -36%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps ∼3% -58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
25 fps ∼5% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼7% -10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps ∼7% -9%
OnePlus 2
23 fps ∼4% -45%
Huawei P9
18 fps ∼3% -57%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
48 fps ∼9% +14%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG G5
30 fps ∼13%
LG G4
9.5 fps ∼4% -68%
Google Nexus 6P
17 fps ∼7% -43%
Motorola Moto X Force
17 fps ∼7% -43%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps ∼5% -61%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
27 fps ∼12% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼12% -10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps ∼17% +28%
OnePlus 2
23 fps ∼10% -23%
Huawei P9
19 fps ∼8% -37%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
27 fps ∼12% -10%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G5
31 fps ∼7%
LG G4
10 fps ∼2% -68%
Google Nexus 6P
16 fps ∼4% -48%
Motorola Moto X Force
20 fps ∼5% -35%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
18 fps ∼4% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼7% -10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps ∼7% -10%
OnePlus 2
19 fps ∼5% -39%
Huawei P9
10 fps ∼2% -68%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
31 fps ∼7% 0%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G5
17 fps ∼10%
LG G4
5.7 fps ∼3% -66%
Google Nexus 6P
9.5 fps ∼5% -44%
Motorola Moto X Force
12 fps ∼7% -29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
19 fps ∼11% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼9% -12%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps ∼16% +65%
OnePlus 2
19 fps ∼11% +12%
Huawei P9
11 fps ∼6% -35%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
15 fps ∼9% -12%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G5
18 fps ∼5%
Motorola Moto X Force
12 fps ∼3% -33%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5.8 fps ∼2% -68%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼4% -17%
OnePlus 2
11 fps ∼3% -39%
Huawei P9
6.5 fps ∼2% -64%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
18 fps ∼5% 0%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G5
11 fps ∼0%
Motorola Moto X Force
7.3 fps ∼0% -34%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
6.1 fps ∼0% -45%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps ∼0% -28%
OnePlus 2
11 fps ∼0% 0%
Huawei P9
7.1 fps ∼0% -35%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
9.4 fps ∼0% -15%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
LG G5
900 Points ∼58%
LG G4
881 Points ∼57% -2%
Google Nexus 6P
791 Points ∼51% -12%
Motorola Moto X Force
939 Points ∼61% +4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points ∼54% -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
986 Points ∼64% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼64% +10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1199 Points ∼78% +33%
OnePlus 2
923 Points ∼60% +3%
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼67% +14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
985 Points ∼64% +9%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG G5
4807 Points ∼56%
LG G4
1995 Points ∼23% -58%
Google Nexus 6P
2424 Points ∼28% -50%
Motorola Moto X Force
3376 Points ∼39% -30%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points ∼24% -58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
3137 Points ∼36% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼26% -54%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4299 Points ∼50% -11%
OnePlus 2
2631 Points ∼31% -45%
Huawei P9
1583 Points ∼18% -67%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
4710 Points ∼55% -2%
Memory (sort by value)
LG G5
1478 Points ∼35%
LG G4
1558 Points ∼36% +5%
Google Nexus 6P
1136 Points ∼27% -23%
Motorola Moto X Force
1085 Points ∼25% -27%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points ∼45% +32%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
876 Points ∼20% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼48% +40%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1124 Points ∼26% -24%
OnePlus 2
1297 Points ∼30% -12%
Huawei P9
2627 Points ∼61% +78%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2035 Points ∼48% +38%
System (sort by value)
LG G5
2925 Points ∼44%
LG G4
2368 Points ∼36% -19%
Google Nexus 6P
1798 Points ∼27% -39%
Motorola Moto X Force
2878 Points ∼44% -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points ∼21% -53%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2737 Points ∼42% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼62% +39%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3925 Points ∼60% +34%
OnePlus 2
2536 Points ∼39% -13%
Huawei P9
3930 Points ∼60% +34%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
3600 Points ∼55% +23%
Overall (sort by value)
LG G5
2079 Points ∼56%
LG G4
1596 Points ∼43% -23%
Google Nexus 6P
1405 Points ∼38% -32%
Motorola Moto X Force
1774 Points ∼48% -15%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points ∼40% -30%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1649 Points ∼45% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼56% 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2206 Points ∼60% +6%
OnePlus 2
1681 Points ∼46% -19%
Huawei P9
2025 Points ∼55% -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2410 Points ∼65% +16%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
LG G5 (9.6 fps offscreen)
543 Points ∼29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
478 Points ∼26% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points ∼39% +35%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
858 Points ∼46% +58%
OnePlus 2 (7.6 fps offscreen)
427 Points ∼23% -21%
Huawei P9
328 Points ∼18% -40%
Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality (sort by value)
LG G5
25532 Points ∼58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
23747 Points ∼54% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
32273 Points ∼73% +26%
OnePlus 2
21533 Points ∼49% -16%
Huawei P9
16610 Points ∼38% -35%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
35000 Points ∼79% +37%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
LG G5
25.26 fps ∼69%
LG G4
8.74 fps ∼24% -65%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
14.52 fps ∼40% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.31 fps ∼36% -47%
OnePlus 2
15.68 fps ∼43% -38%
Huawei P9
7.9 fps ∼22% -69%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
22.7 fps ∼62% -10%

Legend

 
LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto X Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
 
OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530,
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 49)
108 Points ∼19%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Android 5.0 Lollipop Stock-Browser)
82 Points ∼14% -24%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
116 Points ∼20% +7%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 48.0.2564.95)
103 Points ∼18% -5%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Edge 13.10586)
113 Points ∼19% +5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
106 Points ∼18% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
163 Points ∼28% +51%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) (Safari Mobile 9.0.1)
190 Points ∼33% +76%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 44)
80 Points ∼14% -26%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 48)
128 Points ∼22% +19%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
108 Points ∼19% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 49)
9731 Points ∼20%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Android 5.0 Lollipop Stock-Browser)
7832 (min: 6791) Points ∼16% -20%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
8804 Points ∼18% -10%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 48.0.2564.95)
8699 Points ∼18% -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Edge 13.10586)
8059 Points ∼16% -17%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
8851 Points ∼18% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
13191 Points ∼27% +36%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) (Safari Mobile 9.0.1)
15967 Points ∼32% +64%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 44)
6955 Points ∼14% -29%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 48)
11783 Points ∼24% +21%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Qualcomm Browser)
10559 Points ∼21% +9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Chrome 44)
8395 Points ∼17% -14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 49)
3461.1 ms * ∼6%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Android 5.0 Lollipop Stock-Browser)
4770.8 ms * ∼8% -38%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
4193 ms * ∼7% -21%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 48.0.2564.95)
4080.1 ms * ∼7% -18%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Edge 13.10586)
5552.9 ms * ∼9% -60%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
4377.1 ms * ∼7% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
2564.1 ms * ∼4% +26%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) (Safari Mobile 9.0.1)
1743 ms * ∼3% +50%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 44)
6585.3 ms * ∼11% -90%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 48)
2922.6 ms * ∼5% +16%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Chrome 44)
6310 ms * ∼11% -82%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Qualcomm Browser)
2460 ms * ∼4% +29%
Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Android WebView 3.2.4)
5473 (min: 4080) Points ∼72%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Android 5.0 Lollipop Stock-Browser)
4053 (min: 4006) Points ∼54% -26%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
5395 Points ∼71% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
7198 (min: 6255) Points ∼95% +32%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 44)
4526 Points ∼60% -17%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Stock Browser Android 6.0)
6580 (min: 6523) Points ∼87% +20%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Qualcomm Browser)
5954 Points ∼79% +9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Webview)
5142 Points ∼68% -6%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
900 Points ∼58%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
881 Points ∼57% -2%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
791 Points ∼51% -12%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
939 Points ∼61% +4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
837 Points ∼54% -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
986 Points ∼64% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
994 Points ∼64% +10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1199 Points ∼78% +33%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
923 Points ∼60% +3%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1029 Points ∼67% +14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
985 Points ∼64% +9%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 49)
49.7 Points ∼0%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 44)
43.118 Points ∼0% -13%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 Points ∼0% -5%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 48.0.2564.95)
49.373 Points ∼0% -1%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Edge 13.10586)
46 Points ∼0% -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
48.2 Points ∼0% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
75.12 Points ∼0% +51%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) (Safari Mobile 9.0.1)
118.7 Points ∼1% +139%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 44)
44.286 Points ∼0% -11%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 48)
68.4 Points ∼0% +38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Qualcomm Browser)
64 Points ∼0% +29%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Chrome 44)
55 Points ∼0% +11%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
45.53 MB/s ∼52%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
46.96 MB/s ∼54% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50.36 MB/s ∼58% +11%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
24.83 MB/s ∼28% -45%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
78.53 MB/s ∼81%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
79.04 MB/s ∼82% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
76.43 MB/s ∼79% -3%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
55.05 MB/s ∼57% -30%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
16.22 MB/s ∼11%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 MB/s ∼10% -8%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.79 MB/s ∼8% -27%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19.78 MB/s ∼13% +22%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14.53 MB/s ∼10% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15.79 MB/s ∼10% -3%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13.94 MB/s ∼9% -14%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.45 MB/s ∼31% +193%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
89.26 MB/s ∼52%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.5 MB/s ∼18% -65%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20.1 MB/s ∼12% -77%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
22.55 MB/s ∼13% -75%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19.11 MB/s ∼11% -79%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
86.71 MB/s ∼50% -3%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21.87 MB/s ∼13% -75%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39 MB/s ∼23% -56%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
141.26 MB/s ∼68%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
153 MB/s ∼74% +8%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
122.51 MB/s ∼59% -13%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.99 MB/s ∼23% -66%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
99.4 MB/s ∼48% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
145.11 MB/s ∼70% +3%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
125.51 MB/s ∼61% -11%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
72.19 MB/s ∼35% -49%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
427.65 MB/s ∼54%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
251 MB/s ∼32% -41%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
236.33 MB/s ∼30% -45%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
252.03 MB/s ∼32% -41%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
256.75 MB/s ∼32% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
487.34 MB/s ∼61% +14%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
234.21 MB/s ∼30% -45%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
281.26 MB/s ∼35% -34%
Carga Máxima
 37.5 °C37.7 °C35.7 °C 
 37.6 °C34.8 °C34 °C 
 37.5 °C34.3 °C33.5 °C 
Máximo: 37.7 °C
Médio: 35.8 °C
35.8 °C35.7 °C35.5 °C
35 °C34.9 °C34.8 °C
34.1 °C34.2 °C33.9 °C
Máximo: 35.8 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  28.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.22 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.55 / 1.37 / 2.25 Watt
Carga midlight 6.24 / 9.12 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
30h 33min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
6h 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 00min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 27min
LG G5
10.78 Wh
LG G4
12 Wh
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
10 Wh
Huawei P9
11.46 Wh
Motorola Moto X Force
 Wh
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
13 Wh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.86 Wh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
13 Wh
Huawei Mate 8
 Wh
Battery Runtime
-25%
4%
1%
10%
-22%
45%
-19%
46%
Reader / Idle
1833
1654
-10%
1655
-10%
1514
-17%
1610
-12%
1277
-30%
1663
-9%
1078
-41%
1872
2%
Load
267
114
-57%
197
-26%
206
-23%
330
24%
210
-21%
392
47%
179
-33%
256
-4%
WiFi v1.3
387
326
-16%
513
33%
569
47%
426
10%
372
-4%
732
89%
369
-5%
865
124%
H.264
600
501
-16%
714
19%
568
-5%
710
18%
411
-31%
914
52%
611
2%
963
61%

Pro

+ Tela brilhante e de alto contraste
+ Tela sempre ativa
+ Amplos recursos de segurança
+ Boas câmeras
+ Ótima qualidade de voz com supressão de ruído
+ Slot modular
+ Armazenamento veloz
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ SoC muito veloz

Contra

- Apenas USB 2.0
- Sem App2SD
- Aplicativos pré-carregados
- Somente LTE Cat. 6
- Baixa resolução da lente de ângulo amplo
- Sensor de luz ambiente ajusta o brilho muito baixo
- Afogamento sob uso intenso
In review: LG G5. Test model courtesy of LG Germany.
In review: LG G5. Test model courtesy of LG Germany.

A LG foi muito criativa este ano para obter a atenção dos clientes e achamos que a empresa coreana oferece um pacote geral bem-sucedido. A combinação de uma boa tela, câmera aprovada e boa duração da bateria são uma base sólida. Realmente gostamos do novo design e do conceito modular do LG G5 oferece módulos adicionais interessantes.

A LG deveria melhorar a calibração do sensor de luz ambiente com uma atualização, porque os conteúdos parecem um pouco escuros em exteriores. A câmera oferece um desempenho similar ao do predecessor, a ideia de uma segunda lente de ângulo amplo certamente irá encontrar alguns amigos e gostamos dela durante a análise, apesar da baixa resolução.

O LG G5 é um moderno smartphone premium com uma boa câmera dual. Graças ao seu slot modular, o smartphone é um companheiro muito individual, mas também vem com um preço.

O LG G5 não revela problemas maiores, portanto, é um dos melhores smartphones que você pode adquirir atualmente e também está equipado adequadamente para tendências futuras, como a realidade virtual. As adições dos amigos da LG são ótimas possibilidades que também expandem sobre os produtos da LG.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

LG G5 - 05/04/2016 v5.1
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
91%
Teclado
70 / 75 → 94%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
59 / 60 → 98%
Peso
92%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
61 / 63 → 96%
Desempenho da aplicação
60 / 70 → 85%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
81%
Médio
80%
89%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone LG G5
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-05-19 (Update: 2016-05-25)