Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone ZTE Axon 10 Pro: O assassino de carros-chefes da China

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/06/2019

Também disponível com 5G. A ZTE lança o Axon 10 Pro contra os carros-chefe modernos como o P30 Pro, especialmente em relação ao design. O fabricante chinês incluiu um leitor de digitais na tela e câmeras traseiras duplas de 48 MP, mas isso reforçou muitos dos outros recursos chamativos que adornam aparelhos sofisticados. Continue lendo esta análise para descobrir como este suposto assassino de carros-chefes de 600 euros (~US $ 678) se sai em nossos testes.

ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Axon Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Memória
6144 MB 
Pantalha
6.47 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 2 TB. Sistema de arquivos FAT, FAT32 e exFAT suportados, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, e-compass, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G/GSM: B2, B3, B5, B8. 3G/UMTS: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 4G/LTE/FDD/TDD/TDS: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B17, B18, B19, B20, B26B, B28, B34, B38, B39, B40, B41, B34, B39., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 159.2 x 73.4
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix , f/1.7. 20 MP, 125°, f/2.2 secondary sensor. 8 MP, f/2.4 telephoto lens
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix , f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, carcaça, fones, adaptador para conector de 3,5 mm, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value: Head - 0.882 W/kg, fanless
peso
178 g, Suprimento de energia: 72 g
Preço
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

ZTE Axon 10 Pro
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
ZTE Axon 10 Pro

Size Comparison

159.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.9 mm 178 g157.7 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 182 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g156.5 mm 74.5 mm 7.9 mm 179 g155 mm 75 mm 8 mm 172 g142.2 mm 69.9 mm 7.9 mm 150 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +11%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
674 (min: 646, max: 691) MBit/s ∼99% +10%
Nokia 9 PureView
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
638 (min: 561, max: 664) MBit/s ∼94% +4%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
613 (min: 284, max: 694) MBit/s ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
520 (min: 445, max: 571) MBit/s ∼77% -15%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
388 (min: 361, max: 421) MBit/s ∼57% -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=408)
222 MBit/s ∼33% -64%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (min: 613, max: 699) MBit/s ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼81% +1%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
527 (min: 481, max: 556) MBit/s ∼80%
Nokia 9 PureView
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
523 (min: 421, max: 559) MBit/s ∼79% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
468 (min: 351, max: 489) MBit/s ∼71% -11%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
330 (min: 232, max: 365) MBit/s ∼50% -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=408)
212 MBit/s ∼32% -60%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø612 (284-694)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø527 (481-556)
GPS test: ZTE Axon 10 Pro - Overview
GPS test: ZTE Axon 10 Pro - Overview
GPS test: ZTE Axon 10 Pro – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: ZTE Axon 10 Pro – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: ZTE Axon 10 Pro - Loop
GPS test: ZTE Axon 10 Pro - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
A photo of our test chart shot in low-light
380
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
410
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 414 cd/m² Médio: 399 cd/m² Minimum: 2.72 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 402 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
OnePlus 7
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Nokia 9 PureView
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 5.99
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Samsung Galaxy S10e
AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.8
Screen
23%
21%
38%
51%
28%
Brightness middle
402
521
30%
603
50%
648
61%
593
48%
426
6%
Brightness
399
517
30%
605
52%
641
61%
587
47%
427
7%
Brightness Distribution
92
96
4%
94
2%
92
0%
94
2%
96
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.1
2.9
29%
3.5
15%
2.3
44%
0.9
78%
2.14
48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.5
5.5
15%
7.7
-18%
5.2
20%
2
69%
3.29
49%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.7
2.7
27%
2.7
27%
2.2
41%
1.5
59%
1.8
51%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.01 109%
2.266 97%
2.3 96%
2.27 97%
2.111 104%
CCT
7841 83%
6288 103%
6775 96%
6592 99%
6548 99%
6329 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 277.8 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 277.8 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 277.8 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9439 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.2 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7553 Points ∼56%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13505 Points ∼100% +79%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7372 Points ∼55% -2%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13272 Points ∼98% +76%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼55% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10170 Points ∼75% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7372 - 8024, n=10)
7597 Points ∼56% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=307)
4559 Points ∼34% -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10765 Points ∼95%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8988 Points ∼79% -17%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points ∼100% +6%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8909 Points ∼78% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼97% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10553 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10187 - 11388, n=11)
10932 Points ∼96% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=362)
4549 Points ∼40% -58%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3476 Points ∼77%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2418 Points ∼54% -30%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3510 Points ∼78% +1%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2421 Points ∼54% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼78% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4506 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3406 - 3537, n=11)
3487 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=364)
1354 Points ∼30% -61%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9664 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8099 Points ∼84% -16%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9205 Points ∼95% -5%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8415 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
7966 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=10)
9581 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=357)
4997 Points ∼52% -48%
Work performance score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11857 Points ∼98%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9795 Points ∼81% -17%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
12095 Points ∼100% +2%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9917 Points ∼82% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼91% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10008 Points ∼83% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=10)
12092 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=525)
5466 Points ∼45% -54%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3134 Points ∼94%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3324 Points ∼100% +6%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2857 Points ∼86% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼99% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2104 - 3365, n=10)
3011 Points ∼91% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1779 - 15735, n=44)
2435 Points ∼73% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5779 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5862 Points ∼100% +1%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4978 Points ∼85% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4236 - 5862, n=10)
5533 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (209 - 14536, n=44)
2471 Points ∼42% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4866 Points ∼97%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5012 Points ∼100% +3%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4273 Points ∼85% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼98% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3800 - 5012, n=10)
4649 Points ∼93% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (260 - 14786, n=47)
2125 Points ∼42% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4235 Points ∼96%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3639 Points ∼82% -14%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4416 Points ∼100% +4%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3456 Points ∼78% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼85% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3106 Points ∼70% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 4535, n=10)
3778 Points ∼86% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=372)
1830 Points ∼41% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7083 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5741 Points ∼81% -19%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7089 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5828 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
5368 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7115, n=10)
6745 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=372)
1598 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6162 Points ∼99%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5088 Points ∼81% -17%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6249 Points ∼100% +1%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5057 Points ∼81% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼95% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4620 Points ∼74% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6312, n=10)
5698 Points ∼91% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=375)
1484 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4120 Points ∼94%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3649 Points ∼83% -11%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4405 Points ∼100% +7%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3368 Points ∼76% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼86% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3077 Points ∼70% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2345 - 4703, n=9)
3943 Points ∼90% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=386)
1805 Points ∼41% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10279 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8341 Points ∼81% -19%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10302 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8435 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4886 Points ∼47% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6358 - 10420, n=9)
9714 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=386)
2194 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7716 Points ∼97%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6487 Points ∼82% -16%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7940 Points ∼100% +3%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6322 Points ∼80% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼94% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4321 Points ∼54% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5268 - 8141, n=9)
7281 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=387)
1860 Points ∼23% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4093 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3623 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4093 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3418 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3005 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4320, n=10)
3759 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=448)
1760 Points ∼43% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6356 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5181 Points ∼82% -18%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6336 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5123 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
5206 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5663 - 6362, n=10)
6227 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=450)
1324 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5661 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4729 Points ∼84% -16%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5648 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4612 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4477 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5734, n=10)
5412 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=458)
1262 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3919 Points ∼96%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3543 Points ∼87% -10%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4068 Points ∼100% +4%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3179 Points ∼78% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼89% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
2906 Points ∼71% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3505 - 4454, n=9)
3930 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=480)
1667 Points ∼41% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9932 Points ∼99%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8219 Points ∼82% -17%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10008 Points ∼100% +1%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8053 Points ∼80% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4507 Points ∼45% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6122 - 10008, n=9)
9436 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=480)
1801 Points ∼18% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7407 Points ∼98%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6355 Points ∼84% -14%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7556 Points ∼100% +2%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6007 Points ∼79% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼95% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4015 Points ∼53% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5251 - 7820, n=9)
7198 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=488)
1541 Points ∼20% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
23877 Points ∼66%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35430 Points ∼98% +48%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
36069 Points ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼70% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
32155 Points ∼89% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (23877 - 45072, n=9)
31887 Points ∼88% +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=640)
13636 Points ∼38% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106799 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
81640 Points ∼76% -24%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
83854 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
72022 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (106770 - 110432, n=9)
94164 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11427 - 162695, n=640)
19988 Points ∼19% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60279 Points ∼93%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
63295 Points ∼98% +5%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64782 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼96% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
56465 Points ∼87% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (69203 - 83518, n=9)
61193 Points ∼94% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=641)
16573 Points ∼26% -73%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
166 fps ∼99%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼90% -10%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼100% +1%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
151 fps ∼90% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
141 fps ∼84% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (85 - 167, n=11)
159 fps ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=669)
35 fps ∼21% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
59 fps ∼94%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼96% +2%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼96% +2%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼96% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼96% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
60 fps ∼96% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (59 - 91, n=11)
62.8 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=672)
26.9 fps ∼43% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82 fps ∼82% -18%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
100 fps ∼100% 0%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
83 fps ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
85 fps ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (50 - 102, n=11)
95.5 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=588)
19.3 fps ∼19% -81%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
59 fps ∼97%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼97% 0%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼99% +2%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
50 fps ∼83% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼99% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
59 fps ∼97% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51 - 85, n=11)
60.6 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=593)
17.8 fps ∼29% -70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
70 fps ∼100%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼86% -14%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
67 fps ∼96% -4%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
53 fps ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (35 - 71, n=11)
62.5 fps ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=449)
15.9 fps ∼23% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼98%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55 fps ∼95% -4%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼98% 0%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼55% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
53 fps ∼91% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=11)
49 fps ∼84% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=452)
15.2 fps ∼26% -73%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25 fps ∼89%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼50% -44%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼93% +4%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13 fps ∼46% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼86% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
28 fps ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (14 - 26, n=10)
21.9 fps ∼78% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=152)
8.97 fps ∼32% -64%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼77%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +29%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼77% 0%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼64% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼73% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
16 fps ∼73% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 22, n=11)
16.2 fps ∼74% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=152)
6.2 fps ∼28% -64%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼92% -8%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼100% 0%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21 fps ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
16 fps ∼42% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 38, n=10)
34 fps ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=154)
13.5 fps ∼36% -64%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼86% -12%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼100% +2%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼86% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼95% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
41 fps ∼95% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=11)
40.2 fps ∼93% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=153)
14.8 fps ∼34% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼81% -17%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼98% 0%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼81% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
43 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 42, n=11)
40.1 fps ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=378)
10.7 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼93%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼83% -11%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼93% 0%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
19 fps ∼48% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼95% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
40 fps ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 38, n=11)
32.2 fps ∼81% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=382)
9.65 fps ∼24% -74%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
371848 Points ∼99%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
287049 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
370908 Points ∼99% 0%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
287123 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
329444 Points ∼88% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (217967 - 398720, n=11)
351877 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=270)
130378 Points ∼35% -65%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1431 Points ∼99%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1345 Points ∼93% -6%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1407 Points ∼98% -2%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1317 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
1439 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1171 - 1431, n=10)
1346 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=600)
741 Points ∼51% -48%
Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9361 Points ∼99%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7930 Points ∼84% -15%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9477 Points ∼100% +1%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7918 Points ∼84% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼98% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
8484 Points ∼90% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9477, n=10)
9150 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=600)
1942 Points ∼20% -79%
Memory (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6253 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4492 Points ∼72% -28%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5610 Points ∼90% -10%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4072 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4474 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2661 - 7500, n=10)
5081 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=600)
1446 Points ∼23% -77%
System (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8652 Points ∼96%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8212 Points ∼91% -5%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8986 Points ∼100% +4%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7940 Points ∼88% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼94% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
7831 Points ∼87% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=10)
8586 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=600)
2852 Points ∼32% -67%
Overall (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5188 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4454 Points ∼86% -14%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5089 Points ∼98% -2%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4285 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4548 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5397, n=10)
4783 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=604)
1418 Points ∼27% -73%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
63.057 Points ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼91% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 63.1, n=9)
57 Points ∼90% +8%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
52.718 Points ∼84%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
44.6 Points ∼71% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (14.6 - 108, n=79)
30.7 Points ∼49% -42%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus 7 (Chome 74)
67.9 runs/min ∼100% +2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
66.3 runs/min ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼97% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (46.7 - 67.9, n=8)
62.9 runs/min ∼93% -5%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
50.47 runs/min ∼74% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=71)
34.6 runs/min ∼51% -48%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
110 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼98% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (94 - 114, n=11)
106 Points ∼96% +8%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
98 Points ∼89%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
89 Points ∼81% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=132)
63.5 Points ∼58% -35%
Octane V2 - Total Score
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
25640 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
25051 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=11)
23123 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)
18697 Points ∼73% -27%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
16484 Points ∼64% -36%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)
15819 Points ∼62% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=661)
6268 Points ∼24% -76%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=681)
10805 ms * ∼100% -484%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
2375 ms * ∼22% -28%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)
2357.6 ms * ∼22% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)
2239.5 ms * ∼21% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=10)
2122 ms * ∼20% -15%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
1958 ms * ∼18% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼17% -1%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
1851.7 ms * ∼17%

* ... smaller is better

ZTE Axon 10 ProZTE Axon 9 ProOnePlus 7Nokia 9 PureViewXiaomi Mi 9Samsung Galaxy S10eAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-29%
0%
-42%
-13%
-30%
-25%
-60%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
60.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
61.5 (27.8 - 72.4, n=17)
-8%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=403)
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
88.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
73.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-17%
77 (31.3 - 88.2, n=17)
-13%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=403)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
189.53
22.52
-88%
28.7
-85%
20.18
-89%
165.32
-13%
24.1
-87%
83.2 (18.2 - 250, n=37)
-56%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=710)
-89%
Random Read 4KB
150.36
141.34
-6%
175.3
17%
131.98
-12%
149.36
-1%
136.9
-9%
138 (98.9 - 158, n=37)
-8%
44.7 (1.59 - 175, n=710)
-70%
Sequential Write 256KB
503.04
196.43
-61%
392
-22%
200.3
-60%
388.27
-23%
194.1
-61%
206 (182 - 503, n=37)
-59%
92 (2.99 - 503, n=710)
-82%
Sequential Read 256KB
768.93
719.1
-6%
1463
90%
727.97
-5%
666.06
-13%
792.2
3%
747 (427 - 912, n=37)
-3%
258 (12.1 - 1468, n=710)
-66%
Arena of Valor
0102030405060Tooltip
; min: Ø59.4 (59-60)
; high HD: Ø59.4 (58-60)
Shadow Fight 3
0102030405060Tooltip
; high: Ø59.2 (56-60)
; minimal: Ø59.2 (54-60)
Carga Máxima
 40.7 °C40.8 °C37.9 °C 
 41.4 °C40.4 °C37.3 °C 
 39.2 °C39.8 °C37.1 °C 
Máximo: 41.4 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C
36.9 °C36.1 °C40.6 °C
33.9 °C37.2 °C40.6 °C
35.7 °C37.6 °C40.9 °C
Máximo: 40.9 °C
Médio: 37.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.834.52525.533.23127.525.84022.3265028.5316318.926.58020.222.910021.624.812518.733.216020.248.820017.150.725014.654.931515.961.840015.461.350016.566.263014.268.680014.571.7100013.375.1125013.472.8160013.675.2200014.271.7250014.665.3315013.671.4400014.468.1500014.571.7630014.271.5800014.672.21000014.872.21250014.963.81600015.249.8SPL26.583.6N0.859.4median 14.6median 68.1Delta0.88.739.432.928.325.418.726.526.725.933.229.422.622.721.822.224.43123.839.218.550.417.149.117.853.815.556.114.162.51467.913.869.114.773.515.47715.276.614.376.514.574.913.971.714.675.914.178.114.374.314.574.614.875.714.87514.864.41558.226.887.10.871.4median 14.8median 71.71.510hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseZTE Axon 10 ProXiaomi Mi 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.22 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.76 / 1.15 / 1.18 Watt
Carga midlight 3.95 / 7.49 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
4000 mAh
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
Nokia 9 PureView
3320 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10e
3100 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-17%
-10%
-68%
-5%
-16%
-30%
-24%
Idle Minimum *
0.76
0.86
-13%
0.6
21%
1.65
-117%
0.67
12%
0.6
21%
0.917 (0.6 - 1.3, n=10)
-21%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=742)
-16%
Idle Average *
1.15
1.1
4%
1.1
4%
2.34
-103%
1.26
-10%
1.2
-4%
1.555 (1.01 - 2.35, n=10)
-35%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=741)
-51%
Idle Maximum *
1.18
1.21
-3%
2
-69%
2.43
-106%
1.29
-9%
1.5
-27%
1.933 (1.13 - 2.9, n=10)
-64%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=742)
-71%
Load Average *
3.95
5.02
-27%
4
-1%
5.02
-27%
3.71
6%
5.2
-32%
4.55 (3.64 - 5.8, n=10)
-15%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=736)
-3%
Load Maximum *
7.49
10.82
-44%
8
-7%
6.51
13%
9.3
-24%
10.2
-36%
8.76 (7.49 - 10.2, n=10)
-17%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=736)
21%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
32h 07min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 48min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 37min
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
4000 mAh
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
Nokia 9 PureView
3320 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10e
3100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-3%
13%
-26%
-13%
-32%
Reader / Idle
1927
1989
3%
1250
-35%
1650
-14%
1185
-39%
H.264
1068
933
-13%
732
-31%
1008
-6%
795
-26%
WiFi v1.3
680
661
-3%
901
33%
486
-29%
546
-20%
416
-39%
Load
217
278
28%
202
-7%
194
-11%
164
-24%

Pro

+ Certificação IP54
+ Boas fotos macro
+ NFC
+ Carregamento sem fio Qi
+ Adaptador para conector de 3,5 mm incluído
+ Painel AMOLED
+ Bom desempenho do sistema

Contra

- Design copiado
- Tela escura
- Morno sob uso intenso
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro smartphone review. Test device courtesy of ZTE Germany.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro smartphone review. Test device courtesy of ZTE Germany.

O ZTE Axon 10 Pro pode competir com carros-chefe mais caros em muitos níveis. Tem excelente desempenho do sistema graças ao seu SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 e 6 GB de RAM. Muitos OEMs também omitem a expansão do cartão microSD a esse preço, o que dá ao Axon 10 Pro uma vantagem, pois ele pode ler cartões de até 2 TB. O dispositivo também possui câmeras de boa qualidade, especialmente para tirar fotos em macro. No entanto, a ZTE não ajuda o Axon 10 Pro ao projetá-lo, parece quase indistinguível do Huawei P30 Pro.

O ZTE Axon 10 Pro é uma alternativa poderosa para outros carros-chefe mais caros. No entanto, não faz o suficiente para se diferenciar da concorrência, em nossa opinião. Pior ainda, parece um imitador.

O dispositivo também sofre de algumas deficiências irritantes. Embora gostemos do seu painel AMOLED por sua boa taxa de contraste e valor de preto, ele é comparativamente escuro pelos padrões de smartphone carros-chefe. Além disso, nossa unidade de análise esquenta muito para o nosso gosto sob uso intenso contínuo e pode se sentir desconfortável para algumas pessoas quando jogam.

No geral, o Axon 10 Pro é uma opção bem equipada e potente para séries emblemáticas mais estabelecidas. A ZTE incluiu NFC, carregamento sem fio e Wi-Fi rápido, todos os quais são bem-vindos. A empresa até desenvolveu uma variante 5G, embora o modelo 4G continue sendo o melhor valor, considerando o lançamento limitado de 5G no momento deste artigo.

ZTE Axon 10 Pro - 07/02/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
44 / 60 → 73%
Peso
90%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
72 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
85 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
78 / 91 → 86%
Camera
74%
Médio
82%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone ZTE Axon 10 Pro: O assassino de carros-chefes da China
Mike Wobker, 2019-07- 6 (Update: 2019-07- 6)