Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 6A

Vamos fazer as coisas corretamente. O Honor 6A é uma declaração de guerra para os smartphones de nível básico. Com um preço de cerca de $200, o smartphone de 5 polegadas vem com uma capa smart de plástico/metal, SoC octa-core, Android 7, tela HD e uma câmera de 13 MP. Descubra como o Honor 6A se sai entre os rivais de nível de entrada atuais, em nossa análise.
Honor 6A (6 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, Tela táctil de 5-pontos, 16 milhões de cores, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 8.3 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm , Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, USB OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM, HSPA, LTE, head SAR 0.44 W/kg, body SAR 0.94 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 143.7 x 70.95
Bateria
3020 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 28 mm, LED flash, PDAF, videos up to 1080p @30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix vídeos de até 1080p @30 FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular (5V, 1A), cabo Micro-USB, fones, ferramente SIM, Guia de início rápido, EMUI 5.1, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
142 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

144.3 mm 73 mm 9.5 mm 144.5 g143.8 mm 72.2 mm 8.85 mm 150 g143.7 mm 70.95 mm 8.2 mm 142 g143 mm 71.4 mm 8.68 mm 141 g143.6 mm 66.8 mm 7.9 mm 137 g143.2 mm 70.3 mm 8.2 mm 148 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
110 MBit/s +115%
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
76.6 MBit/s +50%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, Exynos 7570, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s +4%
Honor 6A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.2 MBit/s
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s -5%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s +129%
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
81.1 MBit/s +53%
Honor 6A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.9 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, Exynos 7570, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 MBit/s -11%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.6 MBit/s -18%
Honor 6A: total route
Honor 6A: total route
Honor 6A: turning point
Honor 6A: turning point
Honor 6A: bridge
Honor 6A: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: total route
Garmin Edge 500: total route
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
450
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 480 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 462.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.28 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 480 cd/m²
Contraste: 1116:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.4
Honor 6A
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Lenovo Moto G5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00
Huawei Y6 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Nokia 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
PLS, 1280x720, 5.00
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Screen
21%
27%
-23%
11%
-34%
Brightness middle
480
660
38%
438
-9%
481
0%
502
5%
518
8%
Brightness
462
625
35%
432
-6%
469
2%
494
7%
475
3%
Brightness Distribution
94
92
-2%
90
-4%
84
-11%
89
-5%
81
-14%
Black Level *
0.43
0.29
33%
0.13
70%
0.22
49%
0.35
19%
0.61
-42%
Contrast
1116
2276
104%
3369
202%
2186
96%
1434
28%
849
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.2
4.9
6%
4.8
8%
8.1
-56%
4.6
12%
6.8
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8
7.6
5%
11.4
-43%
15.4
-93%
8
-0%
11.4
-43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.1
4.8
-55%
3.2
-3%
8.5
-174%
2.5
19%
7
-126%
Gamma
2.4 92%
2.18 101%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.29 96%
2.35 94%
CCT
6688 97%
7357 88%
7090 92%
9014 72%
6351 102%
8151 80%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2232 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2232 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2232 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
43936 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
44653 Points +2%
Huawei Y6 2017
40981 Points -7%
Nokia 3
27703 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
35669 Points -19%
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points +10%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
4820 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
4730 Points -2%
Huawei Y6 2017
4607 Points -4%
Nokia 3
3439 Points -29%
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points -3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
3710 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
3583 Points -3%
Huawei Y6 2017
3487 Points -6%
Nokia 3
2568 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3436 Points -7%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 6A
870 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
815 Points -6%
Huawei Y6 2017
839 Points -4%
Nokia 3
551 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
704 Points -19%
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points +20%
System (sort by value)
Honor 6A
1678 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
1656 Points -1%
Huawei Y6 2017
1354 Points -19%
Nokia 3
1081 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1395 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points +36%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 6A
765 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
538 Points -30%
Huawei Y6 2017
1288 Points +68%
Nokia 3
703 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1055 Points +38%
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points +41%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 6A
734 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
722 Points -2%
Huawei Y6 2017
386 Points -47%
Nokia 3
211 Points -71%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
252 Points -66%
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points -9%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 6A
606 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
686 Points +13%
Huawei Y6 2017
734 Points +21%
Nokia 3
575 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
662 Points +9%
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points +18%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
638 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
619 Points -3%
Huawei Y6 2017
680 Points +7%
Nokia 3
556 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
634 Points -1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
2612 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
2563 Points -2%
Huawei Y6 2017
1903 Points -27%
Nokia 3
1520 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1858 Points -29%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G5
1731 Points
Huawei Y6 2017
1238 Points
Nokia 3
1045 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1135 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
9579 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
9494 Points -1%
Huawei Y6 2017
6858 Points -28%
Nokia 3
3665 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
4381 Points -54%
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points +16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
9663 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
9617 Points 0%
Huawei Y6 2017
6184 Points -36%
Nokia 3
3177 Points -67%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3725 Points -61%
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 6A
9297 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
9089 Points -2%
Huawei Y6 2017
11088 Points +19%
Nokia 3
7925 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11426 Points +23%
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 6A
588 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
572 Points -3%
Huawei Y6 2017
267 Points -55%
Nokia 3
152 Points -74%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
115 Points -80%
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 6A
507 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
496 Points -2%
Huawei Y6 2017
221 Points -56%
Nokia 3
124 Points -76%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
92 Points -82%
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 6A
1339 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
1243 Points -7%
Huawei Y6 2017
967 Points -28%
Nokia 3
745 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
925 Points -31%
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 6A
330 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
296 Points -10%
Huawei Y6 2017
176 Points -47%
Nokia 3
106 Points -68%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
79 Points -76%
Sony Xperia XA
422 Points +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 6A
271 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
243 Points -10%
Huawei Y6 2017
143 Points -47%
Nokia 3
85 Points -69%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
63 Points -77%
Sony Xperia XA
306 Points +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 6A
1360 Points
Lenovo Moto G5
1245 Points -8%
Huawei Y6 2017
971 Points -29%
Nokia 3
686 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
923 Points -32%
Sony Xperia XA
1236 Points -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6A
26 fps
Lenovo Moto G5
14 fps -46%
Huawei Y6 2017
17 fps -35%
Nokia 3
10 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11 fps -58%
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps +8%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6A
16 fps
Lenovo Moto G5
16 fps 0%
Huawei Y6 2017
11 fps -31%
Nokia 3
6 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
6.8 fps -57%
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps +13%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 6A
15 fps
Lenovo Moto G5
7.4 fps -51%
Huawei Y6 2017
8.1 fps -46%
Nokia 3
4.5 fps -70%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
5.4 fps -64%
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps 0%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6A
7.1 fps
Lenovo Moto G5
7.1 fps 0%
Huawei Y6 2017
3.9 fps -45%
Nokia 3
2.2 fps -69%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2.6 fps -63%
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps +1%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6A
11 fps
Lenovo Moto G5
5 fps -55%
Huawei Y6 2017
6 fps -45%
Nokia 3
3.2 fps -71%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3.8 fps -65%
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps 0%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6A
4.6 fps
Lenovo Moto G5
4.6 fps 0%
Huawei Y6 2017
2.5 fps -46%
Nokia 3
1.4 fps -70%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1.7 fps -63%
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps +4%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6A
5.6 fps
Lenovo Moto G5
2.7 fps -52%
Huawei Y6 2017
fps -100%
Sony Xperia XA
5.4 fps -4%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6A
2.5 fps
Lenovo Moto G5
2.5 fps 0%
Huawei Y6 2017
fps -100%
Sony Xperia XA
2.5 fps 0%

Legend

 
Honor 6A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2017 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 3 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
27.5 Points +29%
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
21.32 Points
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
20.36 Points -5%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
17.64 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
17.17 Points -19%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
13.97 Points -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
4046 Points +22%
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
3326 Points
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
3092 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
2921 Points -12%
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
2604 Points -22%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
2269 Points -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
16759 ms * -53%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
12791 ms * -17%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
12255 ms * -12%
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
11358 ms * -4%
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
10921 ms *
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
9610 ms * +12%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
72 Points +64%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
65 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
60 Points +36%
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
57 Points +30%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
49 Points +11%
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
44 Points

* ... smaller is better

Honor 6ALenovo Moto G5Huawei Y6 2017Nokia 3Samsung Galaxy J3 2017Sony Xperia XA
AndroBench 3-5
78%
19%
-18%
-2%
11%
Sequential Read 256KB
123.6
230.6
87%
202.6
64%
181
46%
177.7
44%
240.4
94%
Sequential Write 256KB
64.1
45.6
-29%
66.9
4%
34
-47%
51
-20%
68.6
7%
Random Read 4KB
50.2
37.6
-25%
25.93
-48%
17.7
-65%
24
-52%
22.05
-56%
Random Write 4KB
6.94
37.9
446%
20.54
196%
5.5
-21%
9.5
37%
10.6
53%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
48.4
-42%
64.3
-23%
70.3
-16%
72.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
58 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-8%
26.4
-58%
62.9
0%
59.6
-6%
50.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-20%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high52 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Carga Máxima
 42.6 °C42.5 °C42.6 °C 
 42.4 °C42.4 °C43.1 °C 
 41.5 °C41.8 °C41.5 °C 
Máximo: 43.1 °C
Médio: 42.3 °C
37 °C38 °C38.5 °C
37.1 °C38.2 °C38.6 °C
37.5 °C38.3 °C38.4 °C
Máximo: 38.6 °C
Médio: 38 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.637.12525.436.73125.336.94032.929.75033.632.36331.633.78028.427.5100272712520.825.61602226.320021.331.525020.839.831521.24640019.45350019.559.263017.762.280017.964.4100017.869125017.370.7160017.469.3200016.771.5250017.274315018.274.4400017.976.7500017.676.8630017.772800017.870.41000017.968.71250018.1681600018.263.8SPL3083.8N1.355.6median 17.9median 68Delta1.411.527.330.527.327.730.827.726.929.226.934.233.534.226.229.226.223.527.823.525.730.525.725.429.525.432.523.732.522.723.822.726.322.726.332.122.232.140.922.540.949.722.149.758.521.358.565.119.365.17019.77070.71970.769.518.369.569.416.269.470.715.970.772.215.572.274.515.774.580.715.480.780.515.280.571.915.271.970.515.270.569.915.169.958.615.158.646.11546.186.529.686.560.21.360.2median 69.4median 18.3median 69.412.93.612.928.231.128.230.330.130.329.329.929.333.634.433.62834.62827.229.327.229.232.229.231.934.131.939.836.939.836.423.836.448.421.548.451.720.951.757.121.357.159.819.759.865.820.165.867.618.567.667.719.367.769.517.869.567.817.467.867.516.467.567.616.467.667.916.667.97116.17174.716.174.77116.17161166158.716.158.758.916.158.951.31651.339.81639.880.930.180.947.91.447.9median 61median 17.4median 618.82.98.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 6ANokia 3Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Honor 6A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.33 / 2.53 / 2.54 Watt
Carga midlight 3.84 / 6.12 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Honor 6A
3020 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
Nokia 3
2630 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Power Consumption
25%
39%
26%
27%
Idle Minimum *
1.33
0.73
45%
0.67
50%
0.82
38%
0.72
46%
Idle Average *
2.53
1.64
35%
1.35
47%
1.94
23%
1.5
41%
Idle Maximum *
2.54
1.68
34%
1.39
45%
2.06
19%
1.57
38%
Load Average *
3.84
3.46
10%
3.1
19%
3.31
14%
3.48
9%
Load Maximum *
6.12
6.13
-0%
4.02
34%
3.89
36%
6.04
1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
33h 30min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 55min
Honor 6A
3020 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
Huawei Y6 2017
3000 mAh
Nokia 3
2630 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-28%
-11%
-21%
-6%
-49%
Reader / Idle
2010
1243
-38%
1522
-24%
1258
-37%
1425
-29%
775
-61%
H.264
732
616
-16%
693
-5%
628
-14%
819
12%
460
-37%
WiFi v1.3
790
561
-29%
654
-17%
552
-30%
722
-9%
353
-55%
Load
295
207
-30%
302
2%
283
-4%
305
3%
170
-42%

Pro

+ Acessível
+ Carcaça de plástico/metal
+ Dual-SIM híbrido
+ Tela HD brilhante
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Sem afogamentos sob uso intenso
+ Longas durações da bateria

Contra

- Não muito armazenamento livre
- Não suporta App2SD
- Correções de segurança Android não atualizadas
- Sem WiFi de 5-GHz
- Câmera medíocre
Review: Honor 6A. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.
Review: Honor 6A. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.

Com o 6A, a linha Honor conseguiu manter o seu ideal de produzir smartphones que são de bom valor pelo seu dinheiro. O Android de 5 polegadas, disponível por $200 e menos, tem muito a oferecer: uma carcaça bem construída, feita de plástico e metal, uma tela HD brilhante e bem ajustada, longos tempos de duração da  bateria e desempenho rápido do sistema.

Embora o Honor 6A seja "apenas" um aparelho acessível de nível de entrada, oferece um desempenho comparativamente alto e muitos recursos.

O Honor, no entanto, economizou no armazenamento disponível, e apenas a metade dos 16 GB originais de armazenamento está efetivamente disponível para o usuário. A câmera de 13 MP também não é particularmente excitante e você tem que aceitar uma qualidade de imagem medíocre. O Honor também poderia trabalhar em suas correções de segurança do Android, já que tinham mais de 3 meses no momento do teste.

Honor 6A - 09/11/2017 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
82%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
82%
Conectividade
35 / 60 → 58%
Peso
93%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
20 / 63 → 31%
Desempenho da aplicação
40 / 70 → 57%
Temperatura
85%
Ruído
100%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Camera
59%
Médio
70%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 6A
Manuel Masiero, 2017-09-24 (Update: 2017-10- 5)