Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Mate Xs - Dobrável com desvantagens

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/02/2020

Atualizado. Depois de muito barulho, o antecessor falhou em dar o salto para o mercado internacional. Agora, com o Mate Xs, a Huawei afirma ter corrigido todos os problemas e até atualizado o hardware do smartphone dobrável. Em nosso teste, determinaremos se US$ 2.700 são bem gastos.

Huawei Mate Xs (Mate X Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G76 MP16
Memória
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
8 polegadas 10.15:9, 2480 x 2200 pixel 414 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, 10 pontos multi-touch, OLED, Dobrado: tela principal 6,6" (2480x1148 pixels, 19.44:9), tela secundária 6,38" (2480x892 pixels, 25:9), Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 496.35 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, Card Reader: Cartão de memória Nano (até 256 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, sensor RGB, hall effect sensor, giroscópio, sensor g-force, bússola digital, barômetro, OTG, transmissor infravermelho
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (bandas 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 e 19), LTE Cat. 20 (bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40 e 41), 5G (bandas N1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 e 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 11 x 161.3 x 146.2
Bateria
4500 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 40 MPix (f/1.8, 27 mm) + 8MP (Telezoom, f/2.4, 52 mm) + 16MP (ultra-wide angle, f/2.2, 17 mm) + ToF camera, Camera2 API level: Limited
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Dual speakers, Teclado: onscreen, Carregador, cabo USB, headset, carcaça dobrável, SIM tool, documentação, EMUI 10.0, 24 Meses Garantia, Hybrid SIM, head SAR: 0.49 W/kg, body SAR: 0.99 W/kg, fanless
peso
300 g
Preço
2700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82 %
05/2020
Huawei Mate Xs
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
300 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash8"2480x2200
86 %
10/2019
Samsung Galaxy Fold
SD 855, Adreno 640
276 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash7.3"2152x1536
82 %
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
SD 855+, Adreno 640
183 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"2636x1080
87 %
09/2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.5"2688x1242
84 %
10/2019
LG G8X ThinQ
SD 855, Adreno 640
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
89 %
05/2020
Huawei P40 Pro
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
209 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.58"2640x1200

Size Comparison

167.3 mm 73.6 mm 7.2 mm 183 g161.3 mm 146.2 mm 11 mm 300 g160.9 mm 117.9 mm 6.9 mm 276 g159.3 mm 75.8 mm 8.4 mm 192 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
963 (min: 471, max: 1110) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Adreno 640, SD 855, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
662 (min: 623, max: 679) MBit/s ∼69% -31%
LG G8X ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 (min: 539, max: 678) MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
605 (min: 299, max: 640) MBit/s ∼63% -37%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (min: 550, max: 597) MBit/s ∼60% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1368, n=534)
256 MBit/s ∼27% -73%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (min: 461, max: 625) MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Adreno 640, SD 855, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
576 (min: 544, max: 601) MBit/s ∼98% +6%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
542 (min: 479, max: 631) MBit/s ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
474 (min: 405, max: 541) MBit/s ∼80% -13%
LG G8X ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 290, max: 411) MBit/s ∼58% -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1544, n=534)
242 MBit/s ∼41% -55%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø947 (471-1110)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø542 (479-631)
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Lake
Garmin Edge 500 - Lake
Garmin Edge 500 - Turn
Garmin Edge 500 - Turn
Huawei Mate Xs - Overview
Huawei Mate Xs - Overview
Huawei Mate Xs - Lake
Huawei Mate Xs - Lake
Huawei Mate Xs - Turn
Huawei Mate Xs - Turn

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
ColorChecker
7.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
14 ∆E
6 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Mate Xs: 10.01 ∆E min: 5.16 - max: 14.01 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Mate Xs: 7.03 ∆E min: 2.03 - max: 16.1 ∆E
418
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 421 cd/m² Médio: 418.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.57 cd/m²
iluminação: 99 %
iluminação com acumulador: 417 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
96.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
Huawei Mate Xs
OLED, 2480x2200, 8
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Infinity Flex-Display (Dynamic AMOLED, 7,3") und Super AMOLED (4,6"), 2152x1536, 7.3
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Dynamic AMOLED, 2636x1080, 6.7
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
LG G8X ThinQ
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Screen
24%
19%
47%
-48%
Brightness middle
417
531
27%
705
69%
790
89%
570
37%
Brightness
418
532
27%
709
70%
790
89%
581
39%
Brightness Distribution
99
97
-2%
97
-2%
97
-2%
90
-9%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.6
2.3
12%
3.1
-19%
1.4
46%
6.27
-141%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.7
3.7
52%
5.4
30%
3.4
56%
9.75
-27%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
1.5
25%
2.7
-35%
1.9
5%
5.7
-185%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.15 102%
2.11 104%
2.23 99%
2.37 93%
CCT
6276 104%
6631 98%
6264 104%
6466 101%
7309 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 242.7 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18192 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).
Geekbench 5.1
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2757 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2096 Points ∼53% -24%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3979 Points ∼100% +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (2693 - 3979, n=3)
3143 Points ∼79% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 4043, n=47)
1710 Points ∼43% -38%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3600 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2365 Points ∼52% -34%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4511 Points ∼100% +25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3600 - 4511, n=3)
3906 Points ∼87% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=45)
1775 Points ∼39% -51%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2972 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2665 Points ∼84% -10%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3165 Points ∼100% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (2972 - 3165, n=3)
3042 Points ∼96% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (782 - 3531, n=59)
2007 Points ∼63% -32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
766 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
738 Points ∼95% -4%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
779 Points ∼100% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (755 - 779, n=3)
767 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 1342, n=59)
576 Points ∼74% -25%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8309 Points ∼72%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11557 Points ∼100% +39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8309 - 11557, n=2)
9933 Points ∼86% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=341)
4791 Points ∼41% -42%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12324 Points ∼96%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12774 Points ∼100% +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (12324 - 12774, n=2)
12549 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13279, n=404)
4860 Points ∼38% -61%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3915 Points ∼99%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3935 Points ∼100% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3915 - 3935, n=2)
3925 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=404)
1478 Points ∼38% -62%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8512 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9655 Points ∼85% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10261 Points ∼90% +21%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9259 Points ∼82% +9%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11341 Points ∼100% +33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8512 - 11341, n=3)
9530 Points ∼84% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=461)
5658 Points ∼50% -34%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10628 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
12276 Points ∼86% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12665 Points ∼88% +19%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11795 Points ∼82% +11%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
14352 Points ∼100% +35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (10628 - 14352, n=3)
12083 Points ∼84% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=622)
6179 Points ∼43% -42%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3638 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3228 Points ∼80% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3259 Points ∼80% -10%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3128 Points ∼77% -14%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4057 Points ∼100% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3638 - 4057, n=3)
3793 Points ∼93% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=123)
2609 Points ∼64% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4046 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5884 Points ∼93% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4250 Points ∼67% +5%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5733 Points ∼90% +42%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6360 Points ∼100% +57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4046 - 6360, n=3)
5577 Points ∼88% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=123)
2830 Points ∼44% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3948 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4974 Points ∼88% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3981 Points ∼70% +1%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4838 Points ∼86% +23%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5648 Points ∼100% +43%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3948 - 5648, n=3)
5017 Points ∼89% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6618, n=123)
2550 Points ∼45% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2497 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4336 Points ∼76% +74%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4348 Points ∼76% +74%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3866 Points ∼67% +55%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5728 Points ∼100% +129%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (2497 - 5728, n=3)
4383 Points ∼77% +76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=467)
2109 Points ∼37% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5672 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7114 Points ∼100% +25%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5424 Points ∼76% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6857 Points ∼96% +21%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6771 Points ∼95% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (5672 - 6771, n=3)
6350 Points ∼89% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9389, n=467)
1976 Points ∼28% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4422 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6227 Points ∼96% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5141 Points ∼79% +16%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5851 Points ∼90% +32%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6508 Points ∼100% +47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4422 - 6508, n=3)
5690 Points ∼87% +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8111, n=468)
1834 Points ∼28% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4836 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4228 Points ∼74% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4344 Points ∼76% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3308 Points ∼58% -32%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5718 Points ∼100% +18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4836 - 5718, n=3)
5184 Points ∼91% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=497)
2019 Points ∼35% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4064 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9489 Points ∼98% +133%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7751 Points ∼80% +91%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9724 Points ∼100% +139%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7905 Points ∼81% +95%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4064 - 7905, n=3)
5421 Points ∼56% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=497)
2620 Points ∼27% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4213 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7434 Points ∼100% +76%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6601 Points ∼89% +57%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6795 Points ∼91% +61%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7286 Points ∼98% +73%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4213 - 7286, n=3)
5310 Points ∼71% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=497)
2202 Points ∼30% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4305 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4250 Points ∼85% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4201 Points ∼85% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼81% -6%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4429 Points ∼89% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4971 Points ∼100% +15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4242 - 4971, n=3)
4506 Points ∼91% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4987, n=547)
2002 Points ∼40% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6265 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6350 Points ∼98% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6314 Points ∼98% +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼94% -3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6275 Points ∼97% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6465 Points ∼100% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (6244 - 6465, n=3)
6325 Points ∼98% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=547)
1649 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5689 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5722 Points ∼94% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5679 Points ∼94% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼90% -4%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5743 Points ∼95% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6060 Points ∼100% +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (5651 - 6060, n=3)
5800 Points ∼96% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7190, n=548)
1577 Points ∼26% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4192 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4019 Points ∼81% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4133 Points ∼83% -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼77% -8%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3260 Points ∼66% -22%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4975 Points ∼100% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4192 - 4975, n=3)
4482 Points ∼90% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=589)
1867 Points ∼38% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4044 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9918 Points ∼88% +145%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9480 Points ∼84% +134%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼100% +179%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9806 Points ∼87% +142%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7499 Points ∼66% +85%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3894 - 7499, n=3)
5146 Points ∼46% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12394, n=588)
2148 Points ∼19% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4076 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7479 Points ∼95% +83%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7363 Points ∼93% +81%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼100% +94%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6780 Points ∼86% +66%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6739 Points ∼85% +65%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3973 - 6739, n=3)
4929 Points ∼62% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9123, n=591)
1855 Points ∼24% -54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
24989 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
30743 Points ∼66% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
42240 Points ∼90% +69%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼73% +36%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
31384 Points ∼67% +26%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46731 Points ∼100% +87%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (22857 - 46731, n=3)
31526 Points ∼67% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 46731, n=734)
14873 Points ∼32% -40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60860 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106066 Points ∼51% +74%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
108418 Points ∼53% +78%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +239%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
103509 Points ∼50% +70%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
82652 Points ∼40% +36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (60860 - 82652, n=3)
69885 Points ∼34% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=732)
24244 Points ∼12% -60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46141 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
68675 Points ∼71% +49%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
80419 Points ∼83% +74%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +110%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
68517 Points ∼71% +48%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
70593 Points ∼73% +53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (46141 - 70593, n=3)
54429 Points ∼56% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97290, n=732)
19334 Points ∼20% -58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
139 fps ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
115 fps ∼40% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
166 fps ∼58% +19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +106%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
151 fps ∼53% +9%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53% +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (139 - 152, n=3)
147 fps ∼51% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=750)
41.9 fps ∼15% -70%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
58 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼98% +2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (58 - 60, n=3)
59.3 fps ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=759)
29.7 fps ∼50% -49%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
81 fps ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
90 fps ∼57% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
73 fps ∼46% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +94%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼54% +5%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
118 fps ∼75% +46%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (81 - 118, n=3)
99.7 fps ∼64% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=654)
24.5 fps ∼16% -70%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
47 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
58 fps ∼97% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
56 fps ∼93% +19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +28%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +28%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (46 - 59, n=3)
50.7 fps ∼85% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=663)
21 fps ∼35% -55%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
51 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
62 fps ∼62% +22%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
51 fps ∼51% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +96%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼51% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75 fps ∼75% +47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (33 - 75, n=3)
53 fps ∼53% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=518)
19.8 fps ∼20% -61%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
46 fps ∼77% +77%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% +58%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +131%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼60% +38%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
52 fps ∼87% +100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (26 - 57, n=3)
45 fps ∼75% +73%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=520)
18.3 fps ∼31% -30%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼46% -54%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
34 fps ∼74% -26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% 0%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25 fps ∼54% -46%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
23 fps ∼50% -50%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (23 - 46, n=3)
32 fps ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=259)
10.7 fps ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
68 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
17 fps ∼25% -75%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
39 fps ∼57% -43%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼43% -57%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼24% -76%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼28% -72%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (19 - 68, n=3)
38.7 fps ∼57% -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=257)
7.59 fps ∼11% -89%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
32 fps ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
23 fps ∼38% -62%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼97% -3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼63% -37%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps ∼60% -40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (36 - 60, n=3)
46 fps ∼77% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=263)
15.9 fps ∼27% -73%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
165 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼25% -75%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
16 fps ∼10% -90%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼45% -55%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼25% -75%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
50 fps ∼30% -70%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (49 - 165, n=3)
88 fps ∼53% -47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=262)
17.9 fps ∼11% -89%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
32 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼67% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
31 fps ∼49% -3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +97%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼57% +13%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
44 fps ∼70% +38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (32 - 44, n=3)
39.7 fps ∼63% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=443)
13.4 fps ∼21% -58%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
17 fps ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
32 fps ∼67% +88%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
25 fps ∼52% +47%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +182%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼69% +94%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31 fps ∼65% +82%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (17 - 36, n=3)
28 fps ∼58% +65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=447)
12 fps ∼25% -29%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
470692 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
463291 Points ∼93% -2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
418779 Points ∼84% -11%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
496966 Points ∼100% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (450373 - 496966, n=3)
472677 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 599843, n=71)
299770 Points ∼60% -36%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4980 Score ∼99%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5037 Score ∼100% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4980 - 5037, n=2)
5009 Score ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7156, n=78)
2555 Score ∼51% -49%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
950 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1317 Points ∼75% +39%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1446 Points ∼83% +52%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +84%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1256 Points ∼72% +32%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1629 Points ∼93% +71%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (950 - 1629, n=3)
1280 Points ∼73% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=685)
790 Points ∼45% -17%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8570 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9510 Points ∼56% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9334 Points ∼55% +9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +98%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9339 Points ∼55% +9%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10138 Points ∼60% +18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8570 - 10138, n=3)
9114 Points ∼54% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=685)
2296 Points ∼14% -73%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6453 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4945 Points ∼76% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5434 Points ∼84% -16%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼36% -64%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5140 Points ∼79% -20%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6038 Points ∼93% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (6038 - 6942, n=3)
6478 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7945, n=685)
1698 Points ∼26% -74%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8823 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
8825 Points ∼62% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8507 Points ∼60% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +61%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9113 Points ∼64% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9782 Points ∼69% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8823 - 9782, n=3)
9199 Points ∼65% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=685)
3240 Points ∼23% -63%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4640 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4835 Points ∼86% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4998 Points ∼89% +8%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼100% +21%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4841 Points ∼86% +4%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5589 Points ∼100% +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4640 - 5589, n=3)
5111 Points ∼91% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=685)
1637 Points ∼29% -65%
Basemark GPU 1.2
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
22.56 (min: 9.84, max: 36.21) fps ∼56%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40.52 (min: 8.72, max: 66.83) fps ∼100% +80%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (22.6 - 40.5, n=2)
31.5 fps ∼78% +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18.9 - 45.9, n=11)
30.9 fps ∼76% +37%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
54.41 (min: 22.66, max: 105.26) fps ∼100%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
53.27 (min: 13.18, max: 90.75) fps ∼98% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (53.3 - 54.4, n=2)
53.8 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.71 - 72.6, n=13)
34.8 fps ∼64% -36%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
265.49 (min: 28.03, max: 1953.21) fps ∼100%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
258.44 (min: 94.23, max: 1893.49) fps ∼97% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (258 - 265, n=2)
262 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22.7 - 452, n=13)
195 fps ∼73% -27%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
21.38 (min: 8.63, max: 39.25) fps ∼44%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
48.88 (min: 15.26, max: 70.77) fps ∼100% +129%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (21.4 - 48.9, n=2)
35.1 fps ∼72% +64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17.9 - 53.9, n=11)
33.2 fps ∼68% +55%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
63.9 (min: 19.8, max: 113.76) fps ∼100%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
63.21 (min: 17.4, max: 89.51) fps ∼99% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (63.2 - 63.9, n=2)
63.6 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.8 - 85.4, n=13)
37.9 fps ∼59% -41%
1280x720 OpenGL Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
275.84 (min: 45, max: 1209.83) fps ∼98%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
280.11 (min: 94.33, max: 1378.32) fps ∼100% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (276 - 280, n=2)
278 fps ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (27.2 - 537, n=12)
188 fps ∼67% -32%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2076 Points ∼98%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2122 Points ∼100% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (2076 - 2122, n=2)
2099 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 3575, n=124)
831 Points ∼39% -60%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +131%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
69.956 Points ∼54% +25%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
63.096 Points ∼49% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
63.087 Points ∼49% +13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (55.6 - 70, n=3)
60.4 Points ∼47% +8%
Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1)
55.781 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samung Browser 10.1)
53.761 Points ∼42% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=148)
38.8 Points ∼30% -30%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +191%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
116.61 Points ∼39% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
113.88 Points ∼38% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
113.68 Points ∼38% +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (103 - 117, n=3)
108 Points ∼36% +4%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
106.73 Points ∼35% +3%
Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1)
103.59 Points ∼34%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=580)
45 Points ∼15% -57%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +142%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
71.8 runs/min ∼47% +14%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chome 78)
66.8 runs/min ∼44% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (63 - 71.8, n=3)
66 runs/min ∼43% +5%
Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1)
63.1 runs/min ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
62.5 runs/min ∼41% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
61.5 runs/min ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=133)
42.6 runs/min ∼28% -32%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +85%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
129 Points ∼71% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
98 Points ∼54% 0%
Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1)
98 Points ∼54%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (95 - 98, n=2)
96.5 Points ∼53% -2%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
90 Points ∼50% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=211)
68.8 Points ∼38% -30%
Huawei P40 Pro
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +136%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
24128 Points ∼49% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
23781 Points ∼48% +14%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
23690 Points ∼48% +13%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
23506 Points ∼48% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (20917 - 23690, n=3)
21985 Points ∼45% +5%
Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1)
20917 Points ∼42%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=742)
7391 Points ∼15% -65%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=767)
10129 ms * ∼100% -356%
Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1)
2219.3 ms * ∼22%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
2201.2 ms * ∼22% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (1914 - 2287, n=3)
2140 ms * ∼21% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
2076.8 ms * ∼21% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
2002.8 ms * ∼20% +10%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
1913.7 ms * ∼19% +14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼6% +74%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Mate XsSamsung Galaxy FoldSamsung Galaxy Z FlipLG G8X ThinQHuawei P40 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-34%
-4%
-33%
2%
-7%
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.05 (Nano Memory Card)
47.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-34%
68.13 (Nano Memory Card)
-5%
72.1
0%
50.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=491)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.56 (Nano Memory Card)
68.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-17%
82.32 (Nano Memory Card)
0%
82.6
0%
68.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=491)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
259.08
34.41
-87%
212.87
-18%
30.2
-88%
271.83
5%
166 (34.4 - 259, n=4)
-36%
29.2 (0.14 - 272, n=826)
-89%
Random Read 4KB
202.85
158.38
-22%
184.51
-9%
160.5
-21%
228.06
12%
182 (158 - 203, n=4)
-10%
54 (1.59 - 265, n=826)
-73%
Sequential Write 256KB
402.67
394.51
-2%
523.39
30%
497.1
23%
395.74
-2%
478 (386 - 729, n=4)
19%
112 (2.99 - 750, n=826)
-72%
Sequential Read 256KB
1766.63
1302.76
-26%
1442.56
-18%
704.8
-60%
1774.68
0%
1541 (1303 - 1767, n=4)
-13%
310 (12.1 - 1781, n=826)
-82%
01020304050Tooltip
; 0.17.0: Ø39.9 (35-41)
Carga Máxima
 33.4 °C33.3 °C33.2 °C 
 33.8 °C33.5 °C33.1 °C 
 33.7 °C33.3 °C32.8 °C 
Máximo: 33.8 °C
Médio: 33.3 °C
31.9 °C32 °C34 °C
31.8 °C31.9 °C31.4 °C
30.2 °C31.8 °C31.6 °C
Máximo: 34 °C
Médio: 31.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.533.32522.425.53121.422.54024.322.75028.233.56321.627.28022.324.110020.424.812518.631.816017.249.620017.548.225015.154.131515.253.34001555.350014.261.163013.160.780013.963.410001369.712501369.4160013.769.9200014.271.225001469.4315014.470400014.374.5500014.473.4630014.666.6800014.965.81000014.9611250015.262.11600015.644SPL26.481.9N0.849.6median 14.6median 62.1Delta0.89.432.244.236.234.129.127.83026.442.342.126.827.520.321252717.231.217.950.417.150.317.957.316.26116.56515.368.115.670.315.670.114.873.514.472.214.673.914.776.814.174.714.474.314.475.114.972.514.770.814.571.114.868.61559.316.658.227.185.20.963.6median 15median 70.11.28.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Mate XsSamsung Galaxy Fold
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Mate Xs audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy Fold audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.53 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.22 / 3.94 / 4.01 Watt
Carga midlight 4.34 / 8.46 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mate Xs
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Fold
4235 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
LG G8X ThinQ
4000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
43%
43%
31%
32%
28%
40%
Idle Minimum *
2.22
0.6
73%
0.59
73%
0.92
59%
1.1
50%
1.38 (0.92 - 2.22, n=3)
38%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=841)
60%
Idle Average *
3.94
0.85
78%
0.88
78%
2.9
26%
1.49
62%
2.42 (1.41 - 3.94, n=3)
39%
1.747 (0.6 - 6.2, n=840)
56%
Idle Maximum *
4.01
1
75%
0.95
76%
2.94
27%
1.76
56%
2.63 (1.47 - 4.01, n=3)
34%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=841)
49%
Load Average *
4.34
4.47
-3%
4.97
-15%
3.65
16%
4.2
3%
3.73 (3.35 - 4.34, n=3)
14%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=835)
6%
Load Maximum *
8.46
9.02
-7%
8.37
1%
6.18
27%
9.2
-9%
7.24 (6.37 - 8.46, n=3)
14%
6.02 (1.2 - 14.2, n=835)
29%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
17h 51min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
8h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 42min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 57min
Huawei Mate Xs
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Fold
4235 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
LG G8X ThinQ
4000 mAh
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
Battery Runtime
28%
3%
81%
93%
24%
Reader / Idle
1071
1724
61%
1741
63%
2618
144%
1474
38%
H.264
762
1027
35%
527
-31%
1346
77%
1137
49%
WiFi v1.3
481
600
25%
647
35%
909
89%
930
93%
743
54%
Load
357
316
-11%
157
-56%
408
14%
198
-45%

Pro

+ Design dobrável atraente
+ Bastante fino quando dobrado
+ SoC 5G veloz
+ Muito armazenamento UFS 3.0
+ Bom sistema de quatro câmeras
+ Excelentes capacidades de localização

Contra

- Qualidade de chamada medíocre
- Qualidade de construção inconsistente
- Dobradiça barulhenta
- Sem serviços Google
- Sem certificação DRM
- Tela com baixas reservas de brilho

Veredicto - Dobrável caro

In review: Huawei Mate Xs. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany
In review: Huawei Mate Xs. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany

O Huawei Mate Xs é um bom smartphone dobrável que, com sua tela externa, escolheu uma abordagem diferente do conceito do Galaxy Fold. Como resultado, a tela e o protetor de tela são mais estressados do que os do dispositivo da Samsung. No entanto, esse não é um problema enorme, graças ao serviço de atendimento, desde que exista um centro de atendimento nas proximidades.

Tecnologicamente, o Mate Xs oferece muitos recursos avançados. Além do chipset 5G, isso também inclui a câmera e o armazenamento rápido. Apesar de sua capacidade já massiva, a última pode até ser expandida. A este respeito, os usuários serão limitados aos cartões de memória Nano da Huawei.

Embora o Huawei Mate Xs seja um atraente dobrável, ele ainda não parece ter madurado em todas as áreas.

Por cerca de US$ 2.700, o Huawei Mate Xs está longe de ser uma pechincha. Assim, os compradores podem esperar apenas o melhor, e a Huawei cumpre isso em muitos casos, além de não economizar muito nos acessórios. Embora esperássemos mais em termos de brilho máximo da tela, a falta dela não é uma grande surpresa, tendo em vista o consumo de energia razoavelmente alto e provavelmente um compromisso necessário para alcançar tempos de duração aceitáveis.

Além disso, criticamos o fabricante chinês pela qualidade de construção do telefone. A dobradiça range bastante alto e causa uma impressão menos robusta do que havíamos previsto. Além disso, a parte de trás da carcaça é muito flexível em algumas áreas.

Também existem limitações devido à guerra comercial com os EUA, como a omissão de serviços do Google. O EMUI 10.0 também não parece estar perfeitamente preparado para essa situação. Como, particularmente nos jogos, o software portado ainda não funciona perfeitamente, esperamos uma atualização rápida para a versão 10.1.

O Huawei Mate Xs certamente não é um dispositivo para todos. O preço alto provavelmente será suficiente para impedir a maioria dos possíveis compradores. Dito isto, ainda é um conceito atraente que, neste caso, foi emparelhado com muitos componentes poderosos, que o transformam em um smartphone exclusivo que certamente chamará a atenção.

Huawei Mate Xs - 04/24/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
66%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
65 / 70 → 93%
Peso
86%
Bateria
84%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
47 / 64 → 74%
Desempenho da aplicação
77 / 86 → 90%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
79%
Médio
78%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Mate Xs - Dobrável com desvantagens
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-05- 2 (Update: 2020-05- 4)