Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy Z Flip - O melhor smartphone dobrável

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/25/2020

Flip, flip, hooray! Com o Galaxy Z Flip, a Samsung está lançando seu segundo smartphone dobrável, que apresenta um conceito dobrável semelhante ao do Razr. O preço também é igualmente alto, mas o celular Samsung promete uma configuração mais forte com base em sua folha de dados. Nesta análise, você descobrirá se o Galaxy Z Flip também convence na vida cotidiana ou se é apenas uma dispositivo caro que está de moda.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Placa gráfica
Memória
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
6.7 polegadas 22:9, 2636 x 1080 pixel 425 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Dynamic AMOLED, Infinity Flex O display, dobrável; tampa da tela: 1.1", 112x300, Super AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 223.1 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, acelerômetro, sensor de posição, orientation sensor, sensor G, magnetômetro, barômetro, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 und 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 34 and 39), LTE Cat. 16 (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 34, 38, 39, 40 and 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.2 x 167.3 x 73.6
Bateria
12.9 Wh, 3300 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 2 células: (célula 1: 9.15 Wh, 2370 mAh, 4,43 V; célula 2: 3.474 Wh, 900 mAh, 3,86 V)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Wide angle, f/1.8, 27 mm, 1/2.55", 1.4 µm) + 12 MP (ultra wide angle, f/2.2, 12 mm, 1.12 µm); Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.4, 26 mm, 1.22 µm)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: on-screen, Carregador rápido, adaptador OTG, SIM tool, cabo USB (Type-A para Type-C), fones, capa transparente, One UI 2.0, Netflix, Spotify, Galaxy Apps, Microsoft Apps, Facebook, 24 Meses Garantia, Head SAR: 0.369 W/kg, body SAR: 1.546 W/kg, single-band GNSS: GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS and SBAS, DRM Widevine L1, fanless
peso
183 g, Suprimento de energia: 59 g
Preço
1480 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82 %
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
SD 855+, Adreno 640
183 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"2636x1080
87 %
11/2019
OnePlus 7T Pro
SD 855+, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
87 %
04/2019
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12
198 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.7"3040x1440
86 %
10/2019
Samsung Galaxy Fold
SD 855, Adreno 640
276 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash7.3"2152x1536
89 %
12/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176

Size comparison

167.3 mm 73.6 mm 7.2 mm 183 g162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g162.6 mm 77.1 mm 7.9 mm 198 g160.9 mm 117.9 mm 6.9 mm 276 g158.1 mm 73.1 mm 8.8 mm 198 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (min: 912, max: 1092) MBit/s ∼100% +67%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (min: 468, max: 602) MBit/s ∼53% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Adreno 640, SD 855, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
662 (min: 623, max: 679) MBit/s ∼66% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
605 (min: 299, max: 640) MBit/s ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
567 (min: 371, max: 667) MBit/s ∼56% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 347, max: 505) MBit/s ∼47% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1368, n=534)
256 MBit/s ∼25% -58%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (min: 923, max: 995) MBit/s ∼100% +104%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (min: 584, max: 715) MBit/s ∼66% +34%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Adreno 640, SD 855, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
576 (min: 544, max: 601) MBit/s ∼60% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
548 (min: 399, max: 599) MBit/s ∼57% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
474 (min: 405, max: 541) MBit/s ∼49%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
352 (min: 311, max: 375) MBit/s ∼36% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1544, n=534)
242 MBit/s ∼25% -49%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø595 (299-640)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø474 (405-541)
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Lake tour
Garmin Edge 500 - Lake tour
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip - Overview
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip - Overview
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip - Lake tour
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip - Lake tour
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip - Turning point
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip - Turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
59.1 ∆E
49 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
29 ∆E
60.5 ∆E
59.6 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
69.1 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
73.1 ∆E
67.3 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Flip: 43.81 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 73.15 ∆E
ColorChecker
10.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Flip: 7.36 ∆E min: 2.25 - max: 12.33 ∆E
696
cd/m²
714
cd/m²
716
cd/m²
704
cd/m²
705
cd/m²
719
cd/m²
705
cd/m²
708
cd/m²
718
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 719 cd/m² Médio: 709.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.64 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 705 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Dynamic AMOLED, 2636x1080, 6.7
OnePlus 7T Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.7
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Infinity Flex-Display (Dynamic AMOLED, 7,3") und Super AMOLED (4,6"), 2152x1536, 7.3
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
Screen
-3%
-13%
9%
-2%
Brightness middle
705
606
-14%
735
4%
531
-25%
592
-16%
Brightness
709
611
-14%
735
4%
532
-25%
605
-15%
Brightness Distribution
97
95
-2%
94
-3%
97
0%
96
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.1
3.46
-12%
3.9
-26%
2.3
26%
2.5
19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.4
5.64
-4%
10.9
-102%
3.7
31%
5.5
-2%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
2
26%
1.4
48%
1.5
44%
2.6
4%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.258 97%
2.09 105%
2.15 102%
2.16 102%
CCT
6264 104%
6779 96%
6549 99%
6631 98%
6173 105%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).
Geekbench 5.1
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2096 Points ∼52%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4043 Points ∼100% +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
2096 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 4043, n=50)
1696 Points ∼42% -19%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2365 Points ∼53%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4491 Points ∼100% +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
2365 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=48)
1758 Points ∼39% -26%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2665 Points ∼87%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
2665 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (782 - 3531, n=62)
2007 Points ∼66% -25%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
738 Points ∼94%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
738 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 1342, n=62)
574 Points ∼73% -22%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10192 Points ∼83%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12228 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (7196 - 8317, n=2)
7757 Points ∼63%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=346)
4786 Points ∼39%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10489 Points ∼85%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12280 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (9705 - 11388, n=2)
10547 Points ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13279, n=408)
4874 Points ∼40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3898 Points ∼86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (3603 - 3705, n=2)
3654 Points ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=408)
1483 Points ∼33%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10261 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7704 Points ∼74% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9655 Points ∼92% -6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼99% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8702 - 11690, n=5)
10359 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=463)
5673 Points ∼54% -45%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12665 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9557 Points ∼69% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
12276 Points ∼88% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10286 - 15193, n=5)
12739 Points ∼91% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=624)
6193 Points ∼44% -51%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3259 Points ∼84%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼92% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2720 Points ∼70% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3228 Points ∼83% -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (3259 - 3565, n=4)
3469 Points ∼90% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=125)
2605 Points ∼67% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4250 Points ∼65%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼100% +54%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5565 Points ∼85% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5884 Points ∼90% +38%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼98% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4250 - 6640, n=4)
5985 Points ∼92% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=125)
2800 Points ∼43% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3981 Points ∼71%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼99% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4515 Points ∼81% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4974 Points ∼89% +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (3981 - 5530, n=4)
5132 Points ∼92% +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6618, n=125)
2526 Points ∼45% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4348 Points ∼78%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼84% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3480 Points ∼62% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4336 Points ∼78% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4348 - 4737, n=5)
4617 Points ∼83% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=469)
2110 Points ∼38% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5424 Points ∼68%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5418 Points ∼68% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7114 Points ∼89% +31%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼83% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (5424 - 8006, n=5)
7465 Points ∼93% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9389, n=469)
1971 Points ∼25% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5141 Points ∼74%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4821 Points ∼70% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6227 Points ∼90% +21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼92% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (5141 - 6916, n=5)
6547 Points ∼95% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8111, n=470)
1830 Points ∼26% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4344 Points ∼85%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼90% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3513 Points ∼68% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4228 Points ∼82% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4344 - 4725, n=5)
4559 Points ∼89% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=499)
2021 Points ∼39% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7751 Points ∼68%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5307 Points ∼46% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9489 Points ∼83% +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼70% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (7751 - 11448, n=5)
10685 Points ∼93% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=499)
2616 Points ∼23% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6601 Points ∼77%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼100% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4766 Points ∼55% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7434 Points ∼86% +13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼82% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6601 - 8651, n=5)
8199 Points ∼95% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=499)
2200 Points ∼26% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4201 Points ∼86%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼92% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3296 Points ∼67% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4250 Points ∼87% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4201 - 4519, n=5)
4434 Points ∼90% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4987, n=549)
2003 Points ∼41% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6314 Points ∼90%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5152 Points ∼73% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6350 Points ∼90% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼92% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6314 - 7150, n=5)
6927 Points ∼98% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=549)
1646 Points ∼23% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5679 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4579 Points ∼73% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5722 Points ∼91% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼97% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (5679 - 6319, n=5)
6157 Points ∼98% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7190, n=550)
1575 Points ∼25% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4133 Points ∼84%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼92% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3448 Points ∼70% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4019 Points ∼82% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4133 - 4503, n=5)
4377 Points ∼89% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=591)
1870 Points ∼38% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9480 Points ∼89%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
6058 Points ∼57% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9918 Points ∼93% +5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼72% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (9480 - 11259, n=5)
10559 Points ∼99% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12394, n=590)
2146 Points ∼20% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7363 Points ∼90%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼64% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7479 Points ∼92% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼83% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (7363 - 8338, n=5)
8033 Points ∼98% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9123, n=593)
1854 Points ∼23% -75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
42240 Points ∼97%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼70% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32308 Points ∼74% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
30743 Points ∼71% -27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (30561 - 42240, n=5)
35671 Points ∼82% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=739)
14942 Points ∼34% -65%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
108418 Points ∼92%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼100% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
66990 Points ∼57% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106066 Points ∼90% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼64% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (108418 - 118129, n=5)
115065 Points ∼97% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=737)
24413 Points ∼21% -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
80419 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
54087 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
68675 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (72173 - 81679, n=5)
76411 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=737)
19480 Points ∼24% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
166 fps ∼90%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
97 fps ∼52% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
115 fps ∼62% -31%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼82% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (166 - 185, n=4)
176 fps ∼95% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=751)
42.1 fps ∼23% -75%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (59 - 61, n=4)
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=760)
29.8 fps ∼50% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
73 fps ∼66%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
85 fps ∼77% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
90 fps ∼81% +23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼95% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (73 - 112, n=4)
99 fps ∼89% +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=656)
24.6 fps ∼22% -66%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
56 fps ∼93%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
58 fps ∼97% +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (56 - 61, n=4)
58.3 fps ∼97% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=664)
21.1 fps ∼35% -62%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
51 fps ∼65%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼85% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
62 fps ∼78% +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼71% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (51 - 79, n=4)
70 fps ∼89% +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=519)
19.9 fps ∼25% -61%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼56%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼55% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼51% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
46 fps ∼63% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100% +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (40 - 58, n=4)
49.3 fps ∼68% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=521)
18.3 fps ∼25% -55%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
34 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼62% -38%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (17 - 34, n=5)
24.4 fps ∼72% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=261)
10.7 fps ∼31% -69%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
39 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼49% -51%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼44% -56%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
17 fps ∼44% -56%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼49% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (18 - 39, n=5)
22.6 fps ∼58% -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=259)
7.62 fps ∼20% -80%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
23 fps ∼58%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼65% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼65% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
32 fps ∼80% +39%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼100% +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (23 - 41, n=5)
31.2 fps ∼78% +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=265)
16 fps ∼40% -30%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
16 fps ∼33%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼96% +194%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼94% +188%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼86% +163%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼100% +206%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (16 - 47, n=5)
40.8 fps ∼83% +155%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=264)
17.9 fps ∼37% +12%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
31 fps ∼65%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼90% +39%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼88% +35%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼85% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (31 - 48, n=4)
42.3 fps ∼88% +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=444)
13.5 fps ∼28% -56%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
25 fps ∼74%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼71% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼68% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
32 fps ∼94% +28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼100% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (24 - 41, n=4)
32 fps ∼94% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=448)
12 fps ∼35% -52%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
463291 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
486654 Points ∼100% +5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼99% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (463291 - 501784, n=3)
483910 Points ∼99% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 599843, n=72)
303587 Points ∼62% -34%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
45.28 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (min: 4.07, max: 95.16) fps ∼65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (42.2 - 45.3, n=2)
43.7 fps ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼42%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
28.5 fps ∼90%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (min: 11.09, max: 63.1) fps ∼98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (28.5 - 35, n=2)
31.8 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=63)
16.1 fps ∼51%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
44.62 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (min: 9.36, max: 74.72) fps ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (38.9 - 44.6, n=2)
41.8 fps ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=61)
20.1 fps ∼45%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4986 Score ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4986 - 5025, n=2)
5006 Score ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7156, n=79)
2537 Score ∼51%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1446 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1012 Points ∼69% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1317 Points ∼90% -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (1236 - 1485, n=4)
1408 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=687)
792 Points ∼54% -45%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9334 Points ∼88%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼100% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8981 Points ∼85% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9510 Points ∼90% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼95% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (9334 - 10618, n=4)
10258 Points ∼97% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=687)
2309 Points ∼22% -75%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5434 Points ∼89%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼83% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4502 Points ∼73% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4945 Points ∼81% -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4869 - 6077, n=4)
5368 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7945, n=687)
1707 Points ∼28% -69%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8507 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼100% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7793 Points ∼84% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
8825 Points ∼95% +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8507 - 9294, n=4)
8871 Points ∼95% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=687)
3252 Points ∼35% -62%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4998 Points ∼93%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼93% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4226 Points ∼78% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4835 Points ∼90% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4992 - 5335, n=4)
5112 Points ∼95% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=687)
1644 Points ∼31% -67%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (62.4 - 67.3, n=4)
64.5 Points ∼98% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
63.087 Points ∼96%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
62.417 Points ∼95% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samung Browser 10.1)
53.761 Points ∼82% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samung Browser 9.2)
44.352 Points ∼67% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=151)
38.9 Points ∼59% -38%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (114 - 121, n=4)
117 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼99% +1%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
115.44 Points ∼99% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
113.88 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
113.68 Points ∼97% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
90.876 Points ∼78% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=582)
45.1 Points ∼39% -60%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼100% +19%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)
66.4 runs/min ∼90% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
62.5 runs/min ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
61.5 runs/min ∼83% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (39.1 - 69.1, n=4)
59.3 runs/min ∼80% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
57 runs/min ∼77% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=138)
42.4 runs/min ∼57% -32%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
129 Points ∼100% +32%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼92% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
115 Points ∼89% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (93 - 111, n=4)
101 Points ∼78% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
98 Points ∼76%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
93 Points ∼72% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=214)
68.8 Points ∼53% -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (23781 - 25353, n=4)
24426 Points ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
24128 Points ∼99% +1%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
23999 Points ∼98% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
23781 Points ∼97%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼96% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
20653 Points ∼85% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=745)
7422 Points ∼30% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=770)
10102 ms * ∼100% -386%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
2133.5 ms * ∼21% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)
2076.8 ms * ∼21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2007 - 2134, n=4)
2060 ms * ∼20% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
2002.8 ms * ∼20% +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼19% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
1823.2 ms * ∼18% +12%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Z FlipOnePlus 7T ProSamsung Galaxy S10 5GSamsung Galaxy FoldHuawei Mate 30 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-29%
-53%
-33%
11%
-2%
-78%
Random Write 4KB
212.87
26
-88%
23.79
-89%
34.41
-84%
259.21
22%
162 (24.8 - 272, n=12)
-24%
29.5 (0.14 - 272, n=828)
-86%
Random Read 4KB
184.51
169
-8%
134.96
-27%
158.38
-14%
226.38
23%
201 (169 - 265, n=12)
9%
54.2 (1.59 - 265, n=828)
-71%
Sequential Write 256KB
523.39
405
-23%
246.3
-53%
394.51
-25%
401.79
-23%
519 (387 - 750, n=12)
-1%
113 (2.99 - 750, n=828)
-78%
Sequential Read 256KB
1442.56
1489
3%
815.56
-43%
1302.76
-10%
1780.5
23%
1554 (1398 - 1781, n=12)
8%
311 (12.1 - 1781, n=828)
-78%
01020304050Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.17.0: Ø39.9 (19-41)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.0.5a: Ø29.7 (28-31)
Carga Máxima
 37.6 °C37.6 °C30.6 °C 
 38.8 °C36.8 °C30.4 °C 
 38.6 °C37.7 °C30.5 °C 
Máximo: 38.8 °C
Médio: 35.4 °C
28.8 °C34.1 °C35.1 °C
28.8 °C32.4 °C35.3 °C
28.2 °C34.2 °C35.8 °C
Máximo: 35.8 °C
Médio: 32.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.432.22530.727.13126.424.14024.233.55029.232.26321.825.98019.421.910022.621.51251926.816018.444.720017.148.525016.654.731518.357.840014.858.850015.66363015.263.480014.466.1100014.169.4125014.470.7160013.372.1200013.774.6250014.276.2315014.676.1400014.478.9500014.677.1630014.973.5800014.774.51000014.973.41250014.969.11600015.560.5SPL26.786.4N0.864.1median 14.9median 69.1Delta1.410.441.231.237.534.130.529.33329.637.635.828.625.823.922.222.824.721.929.220.338.82045.819.153.51756.616.556.116.86016.260.515.564.614.869.114.171.415.573.915.572.514.571.213.869.713.76713.866.81465.51466.914.165.714.263.414.35365.168.168.164.360.964.462.127.181.418.721.921.916.313.816.914.70.948median 15.5median 64.61.97.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Z FlipOnePlus 7T Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

OnePlus 7T Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.25 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.59 / 0.88 / 0.95 Watt
Carga midlight 4.97 / 8.37 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
3300 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Fold
4235 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-154%
-50%
-0%
-39%
-76%
-43%
Idle Minimum *
0.59
2.1
-256%
0.66
-12%
0.6
-2%
0.87
-47%
1.274 (0.59 - 2.1, n=5)
-116%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=842)
-49%
Idle Average *
0.88
3
-241%
1.82
-107%
0.85
3%
1.75
-99%
1.866 (0.88 - 3, n=5)
-112%
1.748 (0.6 - 6.2, n=841)
-99%
Idle Maximum *
0.95
3.5
-268%
1.83
-93%
1
-5%
1.83
-93%
2.38 (0.95 - 3.5, n=5)
-151%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=842)
-114%
Load Average *
4.97
5.3
-7%
6.11
-23%
4.47
10%
3.85
23%
4.88 (4.14 - 5.3, n=5)
2%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=836)
18%
Load Maximum *
8.37
8.3
1%
9.81
-17%
9.02
-8%
6.64
21%
8.46 (8.3 - 9.05, n=5)
-1%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=836)
28%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
29h 01min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 80)
10h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 47min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 37min
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
3300 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Fold
4235 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
55%
56%
47%
50%
Reader / Idle
1741
2015
16%
2340
34%
1724
-1%
2174
25%
H.264
527
957
82%
1047
99%
1027
95%
1098
108%
WiFi v1.3
647
912
41%
533
-18%
600
-7%
823
27%
Load
157
283
80%
327
108%
316
101%
219
39%

Pro

+ Celular dobrável elegante e compacto
+ Painel OLED brilhante e com cores precisas
+ SoC Snapdragon veloz
+ Boas câmeras
+ Dual-SIM via eSIM
+ Ampla faixa de frequências

Contra

- Nenhuma expansão de armazenamento possível
- O Wi-Fi deveria ser mais rápido
- Qualidade de chamada moderada
- As propriedades de deslizamento da tela poderiam ser melhores

Veredicto - Alto preço pelo formato

In review: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (SM-F700F)
In review: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (SM-F700F)

O Samsung Galaxy Z Flip é particularmente convincente com seu conceito dobrável, que é muito mais fácil de manusear na vida cotidiana do que outros smartphones com uma tela tão grande. Além disso, é simplesmente divertido dobrar o smartphone com uma mão. A função de suporte integrado conectada à dobradiça também é bastante prática, e a usamos com mais frequência do que o esperado.

O Galaxy Z Flip não é barato nem perfeito, mas é simplesmente divertido.

O maior incômodo é, na verdade, a qualidade da superfície da tela. A película protetora é uma solução necessária, mas não se sente de uma qualidade particularmente alta e não se compara a uma superfície de vidro medianamente decente. Além disso, gostaríamos de ter uma configuração de câmera mais versátil em vista do preço. 

Se você procura um smartphone com uma forte relação preço-desempenho, precisará procurar outra alternativa. Aqueles que desejem ter um elegante dispositivo do futuro terão que fazer alguns compromissos no lado do hardware, mas isso raramente é importante no uso diário.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip - 03/21/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
81%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
85%
Conectividade
50 / 70 → 72%
Peso
90%
Bateria
83%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
52 / 64 → 80%
Desempenho da aplicação
79 / 86 → 92%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
70 / 90 → 78%
Camera
69%
Médio
77%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy Z Flip - O melhor smartphone dobrável
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-03-25 (Update: 2020-04- 3)