snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G: Um telefone dobrável com um ar de confiança

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/19/2019

Inadequado para aqueles que se lamentam - O Galaxy Fold é o primeiro smartphone dobrável disponível comercialmente, um dispositivo que a Samsung revisou após seu lançamento fracassado no início deste ano. Leia para descobrir se as mudanças valeram a pena e o que o Galaxy Fold oferece, nesta análise.

Samsung Galaxy Fold
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Memória
12288 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
7.3 polegadas 12.6:9, 2152 x 1536 pixel 362 PPI, Telas tácteis capacitivas, ambas multitouch de 10 pontos, Infinity Flex Display (Dynamic AMOLED, 7.3") e Super AMOLED (4.6"), Tela principal dobrável de 7,3 polegadas + tela Super AMOLED de 4,6 polegadas (21:9, 1,680 x 720), Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 460.3 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Barômetro, bússola digital, G-Sensor, sensor de proximidade, DEX, OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1.800 e 1900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: Bandas 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 34, 39. LTE Cat. 18: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 38, 39, 40, 41. 5G: N78, 3.500 MHz., LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 6.9 x 160.9 x 117.9
Bateria
4235 mAh Lítio-Ion, Duas células
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix , f/1.5/f/2.4 variable aperture, 1.4 μm, 77°, Super Speed ​​Dual Pixels AF, OIS. 16 MPix ultra-wide-angle, f/2.2, 1.0 μm, 123°. 12 MPix 2x telephoto zoom, f/2.4, 1.0 μm, 45°, PDAF, OIS.
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix , f/2.2, 1.22 μm, 80°. 8 MPix RGB depth camera, f/1.9, 1.12 μm, 85°.
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Dois alto-falantes, Teclado: Virtual, Aramid fibre cover, cabo de dados, adaptador de força, Adaptador OTG, Galaxy Buds, SIM tool, documentação, One UI 1.5, 24 Meses Garantia, Wireless PowerShare, 1-year Samsung Care+, SAR values: Body - 1.267 W/kg, Head - 0.542 W/kg., fanless
peso
276 g, Suprimento de energia: 58 g
Preço
2100 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Device comparison

RatingDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionBest Price
86%10/2019Samsung Galaxy Fold
855, Adreno 640
276 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash7.3"2152x1536
87%09/2019Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.5"2688x1242
84%01/2019Huawei Mate 20 X
Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10
232 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash7.2"2244x1080
87%04/2019Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
9820, Mali-G76 MP12
198 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.7"3040x1440
85%07/2019ZTE Axon 10 Pro
855, Adreno 640
178 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.47"2340x1080

Size Comparison

174.6 mm 85.4 mm 8.2 mm 232 g162.6 mm 77.1 mm 7.9 mm 198 g160.9 mm 117.9 mm 6.9 mm 276 g159.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.9 mm 178 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Adreno 640, 855, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
662 (min: 623, max: 679) MBit/s ∼100%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
613 (min: 284, max: 694) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (min: 550, max: 597) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
567 (min: 371, max: 667) MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Huawei Mate 20 X
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
566 (min: 514, max: 586) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=449)
228 MBit/s ∼34% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 X
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 564, max: 663) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (min: 461, max: 625) MBit/s ∼93% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Adreno 640, 855, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
576 (min: 544, max: 601) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
548 (min: 399, max: 599) MBit/s ∼87% -5%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
527 (min: 481, max: 556) MBit/s ∼83% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=449)
217 MBit/s ∼34% -62%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø662 (623-679)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø576 (544-601)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G - Loop
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G - Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Photo
28.6 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
55.2 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
32 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
28 ∆E
53.6 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
56.3 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
55.9 ∆E
58.7 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Fold: 39.53 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 58.66 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
13.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Fold: 8.24 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 18.35 ∆E
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
A photo of our test chart taken in low light
530
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 541 cd/m² Médio: 532.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.59 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 531 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.15
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Infinity Flex-Display (Dynamic AMOLED, 7,3") und Super AMOLED (4,6"), 2152x1536, 7.3
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.7
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Dynamic AMOLED, 3040x1440, 6.8
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Huawei Mate 20 X
OLED, 2244x1080, 7.2
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
-31%
-8%
20%
10%
-59%
Brightness middle
531
735
38%
683
29%
790
49%
421
-21%
402
-24%
Brightness
532
735
38%
694
30%
790
48%
418
-21%
399
-25%
Brightness Distribution
97
94
-3%
96
-1%
97
0%
96
-1%
92
-5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.3
3.9
-70%
2.9
-26%
1.4
39%
1.1
52%
4.1
-78%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.7
10.9
-195%
4.8
-30%
3.4
8%
2.2
41%
6.5
-76%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
1.4
7%
2.2
-47%
1.9
-27%
1.4
7%
3.7
-147%
Gamma
2.15 102%
2.09 105%
2.11 104%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
CCT
6631 98%
6549 99%
6247 104%
6466 101%
6723 97%
7841 83%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9266 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).
PWM frequency
PWM frequency
Switchover time, black to white: 4.0 ms
Switchover time, black to white: 4.0 ms
Switchover time, grey to grey: 4.0 ms
Switchover time, grey to grey: 4.0 ms
Using the exterior display outdoors in the sun
Using the exterior display outdoors in the sun
CalMAN: Grayscale - natural colour profile, sRGB target colour space
CalMAN: Grayscale - natural colour profile, sRGB target colour space
CalMAN: Mixed colours - natural colour profile, sRGB target colour space
CalMAN: Mixed colours - natural colour profile, sRGB target colour space
CalMAN: Colour saturation - natural colour profile, sRGB target colour space
CalMAN: Colour saturation - natural colour profile, sRGB target colour space
CalMAN: Colour space - natural colour profile, sRGB target colour space
CalMAN: Colour space - natural colour profile, sRGB target colour space
CalMAN: Grayscale - vivid colour profile, DCI P3 target colour space
CalMAN: Grayscale - vivid colour profile, DCI P3 target colour space
CalMAN: Mixed colours - vivid colour profile, DCI P3 target colour space
CalMAN: Mixed colours - vivid colour profile, DCI P3 target colour space
CalMAN: Colour saturation - vivid colour profile, DCI P3 target colour space
CalMAN: Colour saturation - vivid colour profile, DCI P3 target colour space
CalMAN: Colour space - vivid colour profile, DCI P3 target colour space
CalMAN: Colour space - vivid colour profile, DCI P3 target colour space
Geekbench 5
Metal Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6448 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3294 - 6448, n=5)
5360 Points ∼83%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
2107 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1918 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1849 - 2150, n=6)
2011 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 2837, n=22)
1563 Points ∼74% -26%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
2395 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2218 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2218 - 2395, n=5)
2289 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=28)
2014 Points ∼84% -16%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
2699 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3242 Points ∼100% +20%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2531 Points ∼78% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2441 - 2852, n=6)
2604 Points ∼80% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=38)
2018 Points ∼62% -25%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
740 Points ∼55%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1344 Points ∼100% +82%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
749 Points ∼56% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (725 - 750, n=6)
741 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (155 - 1344, n=38)
592 Points ∼44% -20%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5759 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10192 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7553 Points ∼74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7372 - 8024, n=11)
7603 Points ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=325)
4691 Points ∼46%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9852 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10489 Points ∼96%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10765 Points ∼98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10187 - 11388, n=13)
10960 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=384)
4726 Points ∼43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3234 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼100%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3476 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3406 - 3537, n=13)
3486 Points ∼77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=384)
1426 Points ∼31%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9655 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7772 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7704 Points ∼80% -20%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9664 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=15)
9636 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=387)
5331 Points ∼55% -45%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
12276 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9867 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9557 Points ∼78% -22%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11857 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=15)
12136 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14946, n=555)
5782 Points ∼47% -53%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3228 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2720 Points ∼84% -16%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3134 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2104 - 3365, n=15)
2985 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=67)
2678 Points ∼83% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5884 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5565 Points ∼95% -5%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5779 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4236 - 5884, n=15)
5580 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=67)
2745 Points ∼47% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4974 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4515 Points ∼91% -9%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4866 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3800 - 5012, n=15)
4663 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=67)
2496 Points ∼50% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4336 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2517 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3480 Points ∼80% -20%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4235 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 4535, n=15)
3794 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4683, n=395)
1979 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7114 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4103 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5418 Points ∼76% -24%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7083 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7115, n=15)
6752 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=395)
1788 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6227 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3599 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4821 Points ∼77% -23%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6162 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6312, n=15)
5719 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=396)
1659 Points ∼27% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4228 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2488 Points ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3513 Points ∼83% -17%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4120 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2345 - 4703, n=14)
3840 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=423)
1891 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9489 Points ∼92%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2536 Points ∼25% -73%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5307 Points ∼52% -44%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10279 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6358 - 10420, n=14)
9435 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=423)
2388 Points ∼23% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7434 Points ∼96%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2525 Points ∼33% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4766 Points ∼62% -36%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7716 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5268 - 8141, n=14)
7082 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=423)
2004 Points ∼26% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4250 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼95% -5%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3751 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3296 Points ∼78% -22%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4093 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4349, n=15)
3854 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=475)
1887 Points ∼44% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6350 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3528 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5152 Points ∼81% -19%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6356 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5663 - 6362, n=15)
6241 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=475)
1479 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5722 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3575 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4579 Points ∼80% -20%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5661 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5747, n=15)
5468 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=476)
1423 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4019 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3816 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3448 Points ∼86% -14%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3919 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3001 - 4540, n=14)
3881 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=515)
1752 Points ∼44% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9918 Points ∼88%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼100% +14%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2347 Points ∼21% -76%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
6058 Points ∼54% -39%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9932 Points ∼88% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6122 - 10008, n=14)
9184 Points ∼81% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=514)
1937 Points ∼17% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7479 Points ∼95%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2567 Points ∼33% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼66% -31%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7407 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5251 - 7820, n=14)
7022 Points ∼89% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8165, n=517)
1673 Points ∼21% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
30743 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼100% +10%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
19993 Points ∼59% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32308 Points ∼95% +5%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
23877 Points ∼70% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (20636 - 45072, n=14)
31288 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=675)
14216 Points ∼42% -54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106066 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +94%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
42579 Points ∼21% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
66990 Points ∼32% -37%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106799 Points ∼52% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (97354 - 110432, n=13)
105815 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=673)
22187 Points ∼11% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
68675 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +41%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
34035 Points ∼35% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
54087 Points ∼56% -21%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60279 Points ∼62% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (55771 - 83518, n=13)
68188 Points ∼70% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=673)
17924 Points ∼19% -74%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
115 fps ∼40%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +150%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
119 fps ∼41% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
97 fps ∼34% -16%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
166 fps ∼58% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (85 - 167, n=16)
156 fps ∼54% +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=694)
38.1 fps ∼13% -67%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼93%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼92% -2%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
58 fps ∼90% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
59 fps ∼92% -2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
59 fps ∼92% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (59 - 91, n=16)
64.3 fps ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=703)
28.1 fps ∼44% -53%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
90 fps ∼57%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +74%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
78 fps ∼50% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
85 fps ∼54% -6%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼64% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (50 - 102, n=16)
93.3 fps ∼59% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=600)
21.9 fps ∼14% -76%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
58 fps ∼96%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼99% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
58 fps ∼96% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% -9%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
59 fps ∼98% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51 - 85, n=16)
60.4 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=609)
19.4 fps ∼32% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
62 fps ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +61%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
53 fps ∼53% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼67% +8%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
70 fps ∼70% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (35 - 71, n=16)
62.4 fps ∼62% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=466)
17.9 fps ∼18% -71%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
46 fps ∼77%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +30%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
50 fps ∼83% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼62% -20%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼95% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=16)
48.6 fps ∼81% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=468)
16.7 fps ∼28% -64%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼46%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +119%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
20 fps ∼43% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼35% -24%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25 fps ∼54% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (14 - 26, n=15)
21.3 fps ∼46% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=188)
10 fps ∼22% -52%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
17 fps ∼59%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +71%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
13 fps ∼45% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼59% 0%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼59% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 24, n=16)
16.5 fps ∼57% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=187)
7 fps ∼24% -59%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
32 fps ∼55%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +81%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29 fps ∼50% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼45% -19%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼66% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 38, n=15)
33.3 fps ∼57% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=192)
14.7 fps ∼25% -54%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼56%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +79%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
30 fps ∼40% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼61% +10%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼56% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=16)
40.1 fps ∼53% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=192)
16.5 fps ∼22% -61%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼67%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +50%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
28 fps ∼44% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼68% +2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 42, n=16)
39.5 fps ∼63% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=391)
12.2 fps ∼19% -71%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
32 fps ∼67%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +50%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
28 fps ∼58% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼48% -28%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼77% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 41, n=16)
32 fps ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=395)
10.9 fps ∼23% -66%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
367169 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
462516 Points ∼100% +26%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
273409 Points ∼59% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
327454 Points ∼71% -11%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
371848 Points ∼80% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (217967 - 398720, n=16)
354450 Points ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=296)
143587 Points ∼31% -61%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
251927 Points ∼89%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
253082 Points ∼89% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
283270 Points ∼100% +12%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
254602 Points ∼90% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (239512 - 268271, n=12)
255436 Points ∼90% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5600 - 293444, n=490)
87858 Points ∼31% -65%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1317 Points ∼75%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +32%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1239 Points ∼71% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1012 Points ∼58% -23%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1431 Points ∼82% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1076 - 1601, n=15)
1343 Points ∼77% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 9387, n=635)
773 Points ∼44% -41%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9510 Points ∼56%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +79%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5070 Points ∼30% -47%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8981 Points ∼53% -6%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9361 Points ∼55% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9510, n=15)
9183 Points ∼54% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=635)
2070 Points ∼12% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4945 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼38% -52%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5700 Points ∼91% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4502 Points ∼72% -9%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6253 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2661 - 7500, n=15)
5002 Points ∼80% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=635)
1530 Points ∼24% -69%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
8825 Points ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +61%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7923 Points ∼56% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7793 Points ∼55% -12%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8652 Points ∼61% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=15)
8502 Points ∼60% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=635)
2994 Points ∼21% -66%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4835 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼100% +16%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4104 Points ∼73% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4226 Points ∼75% -13%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5188 Points ∼93% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5397, n=15)
4753 Points ∼85% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=635)
1501 Points ∼27% -69%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +140%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=13)
57.6 Points ∼45% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samung Browser 10.1)
53.761 Points ∼42%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
52.718 Points ∼41% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samung Browser 9.2)
44.352 Points ∼34% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samung Browser 9.2)
42.69 Points ∼33% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=106)
35.7 Points ∼28% -34%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +166%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
118.27 Points ∼39% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
113.68 Points ∼38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90.8 - 120, n=13)
110 Points ∼36% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
93.241 Points ∼31% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
90.876 Points ∼30% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
84.48 Points ∼28% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=531)
41.9 Points ∼14% -63%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +149%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
66.3 runs/min ∼43% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
61.5 runs/min ∼40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=12)
61.3 runs/min ∼40% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
57 runs/min ∼37% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=94)
40 runs/min ∼26% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
runs/min ∼0% -100%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
129 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
118 Points ∼65% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
115 Points ∼64% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (94 - 129, n=16)
108 Points ∼60% -16%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
98 Points ∼54% -24%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
86 Points ∼48% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=165)
67 Points ∼37% -48%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +105%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
25640 Points ∼52% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
24128 Points ∼49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=16)
23211 Points ∼47% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
21208 Points ∼43% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
20653 Points ∼42% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
19135 Points ∼39% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=693)
6801 Points ∼14% -72%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=717)
10531 ms * ∼100% -426%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
2527.8 ms * ∼24% -26%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
2145.4 ms * ∼20% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=15)
2128 ms * ∼20% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)
2002.8 ms * ∼19%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
1851.7 ms * ∼18% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
1823.2 ms * ∼17% +9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼5% +71%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy FoldHuawei Mate 20 XSamsung Galaxy S10 5GZTE Axon 10 ProSamsung Galaxy Note10+OnePlus 7 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
125%
-30%
108%
131%
-2%
0%
-65%
Random Write 4KB
34.41
237.63
591%
23.79
-31%
189.53
451%
183.59
434%
24.8
-28%
34.4
0%
22.3 (0.14 - 250, n=751)
-35%
Random Read 4KB
158.38
144.44
-9%
134.96
-15%
150.36
-5%
196.22
24%
174.1
10%
158
0%
47.6 (1.59 - 196, n=751)
-70%
Sequential Write 256KB
394.51
182.7
-54%
246.3
-38%
503.04
28%
588.06
49%
387
-2%
395
0%
97.4 (2.99 - 590, n=751)
-75%
Sequential Read 256KB
1302.76
911.88
-30%
815.56
-37%
768.93
-41%
1503.7
15%
1468
13%
1303
0%
275 (12.1 - 1504, n=751)
-79%
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060Tooltip
; 0.14.0: Ø58.1 (30-60)
Battle Bay
0102030405060Tooltip
; 4.6.22531: Ø59.7 (59-60)
Carga Máxima
 35.6 °C36.6 °C32.8 °C 
 34.1 °C32.6 °C31.2 °C 
 30.1 °C31.4 °C29.8 °C 
Máximo: 36.6 °C
Médio: 32.7 °C
32.4 °C35.1 °C35 °C
28.7 °C30.5 °C32 °C
28.3 °C28.9 °C29.4 °C
Máximo: 35.1 °C
Médio: 31.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  30.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.244.22536.234.13129.127.8403026.45042.342.16326.827.58020.321100252712517.231.216017.950.420017.150.325017.957.331516.26140016.56550015.368.163015.670.380015.670.1100014.873.5125014.472.2160014.673.9200014.776.8250014.174.7315014.474.3400014.475.1500014.972.5630014.770.8800014.571.11000014.868.6125001559.31600016.658.2SPL27.185.2N0.963.6median 15median 70.1Delta1.28.232.239.436.225.529.126.83027.742.342.426.827.220.325.22536.717.244.817.954.317.153.817.95316.253.616.55615.35915.664.415.664.814.867.214.472.314.67314.776.914.176.414.476.914.475.914.973.514.773.814.57214.866.6156316.649.427.185.80.961median 15median 64.81.29.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy FoldApple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Fold audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.19 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.6 / 0.85 / 1 Watt
Carga midlight 4.47 / 9.02 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Fold
4235 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 X
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
4500 mAh
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-88%
-50%
-51%
-10%
-48%
-42%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.92
-53%
0.79
-32%
0.66
-10%
0.76
-27%
0.983 (0.6 - 1.96, n=15)
-64%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=781)
-47%
Idle Average *
0.85
2.9
-241%
1.72
-102%
1.82
-114%
1.15
-35%
1.562 (0.85 - 2.8, n=15)
-84%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=780)
-105%
Idle Maximum *
1
2.94
-194%
1.83
-83%
1.83
-83%
1.18
-18%
1.876 (1 - 2.9, n=15)
-88%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=781)
-103%
Load Average *
4.47
3.65
18%
5.53
-24%
6.11
-37%
3.95
12%
4.64 (3.64 - 5.8, n=15)
-4%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=775)
9%
Load Maximum *
9.02
6.18
31%
9.85
-9%
9.81
-9%
7.49
17%
9.1 (7.49 - 11.9, n=15)
-1%
5.92 (1.2 - 14.2, n=775)
34%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
28h 44min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 10.1)
10h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 07min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 16min
Samsung Galaxy Fold
4235 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 X
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
4500 mAh
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
41%
9%
8%
-1%
-8%
-5%
Reader / Idle
1724
2618
52%
1984
15%
2340
36%
1927
12%
1585
-8%
1745
1%
H.264
1027
1346
31%
986
-4%
1047
2%
1068
4%
934
-9%
802
-22%
WiFi v1.3
600
909
52%
786
31%
533
-11%
680
13%
532
-11%
768
28%
Load
316
408
29%
300
-5%
327
3%
217
-31%
305
-3%
236
-25%

Pro

+ Design inovador com uma tela dobrável
+ Wi-Fi 6
+ 5G
+ Muito armazenamento e RAM
+ SoC veloz
+ Boas câmeras
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Tela vulnerável
- Painel exterior pequeno
- Apenas uma SIM
- Memória não expansível

Verdict - Delicate and innovative

Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G (SM-F907B) smartphone review.
Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G (SM-F907B) smartphone review.

Finalmente chegou, o primeiro smartphone dobrável a chegar aos nossos escritórios e à Europa. Sem dúvida, o Galaxy Fold é um produto inovador, com sua tela dobrável oferecendo uma pequena janela para o futuro. Se o design que a Samsung adotou é ideal ou não continua a ser uma questão de gosto. O Huawei Mate X parece ótimo, mas se seu painel é tão sensível quanto o do Galaxy Fold, questionaríamos o quão durável e prático é.

Talvez sem surpresa, a tela principal é uma das maiores deficiências do Galaxy Fold. A tela dobrável permanece vulnerável apesar de ser reforçada, portanto, não espere que o Galaxy Fold seja resistente nem certificado com MIL-STD ou IP. Mesmo pressionando demais ou batendo com as unhas pode causar impressões profundas na tela, o que pode ser um problema para crianças ou pessoas com unhas artificiais. A Samsung não cobre necessariamente os danos causados dessa maneira, mesmo com o Care+, que é algo que vale a pena lembrar antes de comprar o Galaxy Fold. Também não queremos falar sobre reparos de acompanhamento após o primeiro ano.

Dobrável, ótimos acessórios e muitos superlativos. O Samsung Galaxy Fold é uma forte peça de tecnologia, mas talvez seja apenas para quem tem um toque sensível.

O software, que até agora só foi adaptado para esse formato, também diminui o prazer de usar o Galaxy Fold. No entanto, o Galaxy Fold é um dos primeiros smartphones do gênero, então podemos ignorar suas deficiências baseadas em software por enquanto. No geral, o Galaxy Fold é um smartphone excelente e bem conectado. Portanto, se você tiver dinheiro suficiente para gastar e adora estes smartphones, vale a pena considerar o Samsung Galaxy Fold.

Samsung Galaxy Fold - 10/07/2019 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
79%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
67 / 70 → 95%
Peso
87%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 64 → 88%
Desempenho da aplicação
78 / 86 → 90%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
79%
Médio
81%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G: Um telefone dobrável com um ar de confiança
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-10-19 (Update: 2019-10-22)