Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P10 Lite

Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/16/2017

Alternativa inteligente. O smartphone de gama média Huawei P10 Lite custa apenas a metade do Huawei P10 com câmera Leica, mas tem muito em comum com o bólido de gama alta. Nosso teste mostra finalmente qual é a diferença e quem deveria escolher qual dos modelos P10.

Huawei P10 Lite (P10 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 658 2.35 GHz
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.2 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 424 PPI, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 19.9 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5-mm-Headsetbuchse, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Fingerprint sensor, acceleration sensor, brightness sensor, proximity sensor, Gyroscope, compass, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct, Link+Live
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1.900, 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (800, 900, 1.800, 2.100, 2.600 MHz), downloads with up to 300 MBit/s, Uploads up to 50 MBit/s, Nano-SIM, Dual SIM, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.2 x 146.5 x 72
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix PDAF, CAF, Sensor size 1/2.8", Pixel size 1,25 µm
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Um alato falante na parte inferior, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Cabo micro-USB, fonte de energia modular, fones, guia rápido, EMUI 5.1, Google-Apps, Samsung HiCare, HiGame, File manager, Telephone manager, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
146 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
349 Euro

 

Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite (Foto: Huawei)

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼100% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s ∼99% +33%
Huawei P10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 658, 32 GB eMMC Flash
229 MBit/s ∼74%
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.6 MBit/s ∼18% -76%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.4 MBit/s ∼17% -77%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼100% +48%
Huawei P10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 658, 32 GB eMMC Flash
232 MBit/s ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
225 MBit/s ∼66% -3%
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash
57.9 MBit/s ∼17% -75%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.5 MBit/s ∼15% -78%
Huawei P10 Lite: complete route
Huawei P10 Lite: complete route
Huawei P10 Lite: bridge
Huawei P10 Lite: bridge
Huawei P10 Lite: forest
Huawei P10 Lite: forest
Garmin Edge 500: complete route
Garmin Edge 500: complete route
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: forest
Garmin Edge 500: forest

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
525
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 525 cd/m² Médio: 509.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 507 cd/m²
Contraste: 1408:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | - Ø
99.8% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.28
Huawei P10 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7
Honor 6X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei Nova Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
Screen
34%
-15%
-7%
-4%
1%
Brightness
509
576
13%
540
6%
481
-6%
589
16%
556
9%
Brightness Distribution
95
94
-1%
94
-1%
90
-5%
87
-8%
86
-9%
Black Level *
0.36
0.57
-58%
0.5
-39%
0.63
-75%
0.43
-19%
Contrast
1408
960
-32%
970
-31%
967
-31%
1272
-10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.1
2.4
53%
5.1
-0%
4.2
18%
3.8
25%
4.8
6%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.1
1.9
69%
6.2
-2%
4.8
21%
3.1
49%
4.5
26%
Gamma
2.28 105%
2.09 115%
2.09 115%
2.36 102%
2.06 117%
2.39 100%
CCT
8143 80%
6502 100%
6546 99%
7568 86%
6725 97%
7194 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5559 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (43 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
60438 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
45549 Points ∼20% -25%
Honor 6X
56764 Points ∼25% -6%
Huawei Nova Plus
64601 Points ∼28% +7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
45232 Points ∼20% -25%
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼61% +132%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
3348 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3292 Points ∼12% -2%
Honor 6X
3341 Points ∼12% 0%
Huawei Nova Plus
3156 Points ∼11% -6%
Huawei P10
6036 Points ∼22% +80%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
874 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
682 Points ∼12% -22%
Honor 6X
788 Points ∼14% -10%
Huawei Nova Plus
845 Points ∼15% -3%
Huawei P10
1935 Points ∼34% +121%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
1592 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1670 Points ∼55% +5%
Honor 6X
1440 Points ∼48% -10%
Huawei Nova Plus
1773 Points ∼59% +11%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
1045 Points ∼35% -34%
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼63% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
326 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
253 Points ∼5% -22%
Honor 6X
318 Points ∼6% -2%
Huawei Nova Plus
384 Points ∼7% +18%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
327 Points ∼6% 0%
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼45% +639%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
396 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
312 Points ∼8% -21%
Honor 6X
385 Points ∼10% -3%
Huawei Nova Plus
465 Points ∼12% +17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
386 Points ∼10% -3%
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼59% +474%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
1537 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1699 Points ∼56% +11%
Honor 6X
1433 Points ∼48% -7%
Huawei Nova Plus
1795 Points ∼60% +17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
1042 Points ∼35% -32%
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼73% +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
520 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
407 Points ∼5% -22%
Honor 6X
468 Points ∼6% -10%
Huawei Nova Plus
733 Points ∼9% +41%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
605 Points ∼8% +16%
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼36% +442%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
610 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
490 Points ∼10% -20%
Honor 6X
550 Points ∼11% -10%
Huawei Nova Plus
844 Points ∼17% +38%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
667 Points ∼13% +9%
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼53% +334%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
13510 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12954 Points ∼19% -4%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼20% 0%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼20% 0%
Huawei Nova Plus
15823 Points ∼23% +17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9527 Points ∼14% -29%
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼22% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
10603 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7793 Points ∼2% -27%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% +7%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% +7%
Huawei Nova Plus
13412 Points ∼3% +26%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9773 Points ∼2% -8%
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼8% +239%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
11135 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
8550 Points ∼4% -23%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% +6%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% +6%
Huawei Nova Plus
13882 Points ∼7% +25%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9717 Points ∼5% -13%
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼14% +149%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
17 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12 fps ∼1% -29%
Honor 6X
18 fps ∼1% +6%
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼2% +35%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
17 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼5% +306%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
18 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
19 fps ∼4% +6%
Honor 6X
19 fps ∼4% +6%
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼5% +28%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
18 fps ∼4% 0%
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼12% +206%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
7.2 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5 fps ∼1% -31%
Honor 6X
4.6 fps ∼1% -36%
Huawei Nova Plus
9.9 fps ∼2% +38%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
6.6 fps ∼1% -8%
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼6% +317%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
7.7 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
9.8 fps ∼3% +27%
Honor 6X
8.5 fps ∼2% +10%
Huawei Nova Plus
10 fps ∼3% +30%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
7 fps ∼2% -9%
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼9% +316%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
4.2 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.2 fps ∼1% -24%
Honor 6X
2.5 fps ∼1% -40%
Huawei Nova Plus
6.2 fps ∼1% +48%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
4.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼6% +471%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
4.8 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7.3 fps ∼4% +52%
Honor 6X
4.9 fps ∼3% +2%
Huawei Nova Plus
6.6 fps ∼4% +38%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
4.6 fps ∼3% -4%
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼14% +421%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
5794 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5000 Points ∼60% -14%
Honor 6X
4383 Points ∼53% -24%
Huawei Nova Plus
5724 Points ∼69% -1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼88% +27%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
654 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
666 Points ∼43% +2%
Honor 6X
720 Points ∼47% +10%
Huawei Nova Plus
754 Points ∼49% +15%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼70% +65%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
829 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
529 Points ∼6% -36%
Honor 6X
819 Points ∼10% -1%
Huawei Nova Plus
1015 Points ∼12% +22%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
805 Points ∼9% -3%
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼48% +396%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
1592 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1296 Points ∼29% -19%
Honor 6X
1779 Points ∼40% +12%
Huawei Nova Plus
1553 Points ∼35% -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
604 Points ∼14% -62%
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼63% +74%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
2642 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2185 Points ∼33% -17%
Honor 6X
2721 Points ∼41% +3%
Huawei Nova Plus
2132 Points ∼32% -19%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
1359 Points ∼21% -49%
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼58% +45%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
1229 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1000 Points ∼26% -19%
Honor 6X
1300 Points ∼34% +6%
Huawei Nova Plus
1262 Points ∼33% +3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
283 Points ∼7% -77%
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼69% +113%

Legend

 
Huawei P10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 658, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Nova Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
4589 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3799 Points ∼8% -17%
Honor 6X
4199 Points ∼8% -8%
Huawei Nova Plus
4730 Points ∼10% +3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3656 Points ∼7% -20%
Huawei P10
10236 Points ∼21% +123%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
8590.8 ms * ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
9669.2 ms * ∼16% -13%
Honor 6X
9373.3 ms * ∼16% -9%
Huawei Nova Plus
8027.7 ms * ∼13% +7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
11102 ms * ∼19% -29%
Huawei P10
3128.7 ms * ∼5% +64%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
62 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
64 Points ∼9% +3%
Honor 6X
73 Points ∼10% +18%
Huawei Nova Plus
83 Points ∼11% +34%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
61 Points ∼8% -2%
Huawei P10
136 Points ∼18% +119%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
30.047 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
23.281 Points ∼7% -23%
Honor 6X
26.464 Points ∼8% -12%
Huawei Nova Plus
31.3 Points ∼9% +4%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
22.8 Points ∼7% -24%
Huawei P10
57.9 Points ∼17% +93%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P10 LiteSamsung Galaxy A3 2017Honor 6XHuawei Nova PlusLenovo Moto G4 PlusHuawei P10
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
9%
-10%
9%
174%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
32.7
50.06
53%
34.53
6%
33.32
2%
46.92
43%
32.19
-2%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
53.4
75.47
41%
52.02
-3%
41.64
-22%
74.4
39%
54.22
2%
Random Write 4KB
19.36
9.62
-50%
45.05
133%
30.12
56%
35.79
85%
152.31
687%
Random Read 4KB
72.47
22.32
-69%
39.55
-45%
35.64
-51%
36.32
-50%
168.42
132%
Sequential Write 256KB
129.18
45.96
-64%
73.85
-43%
82.13
-36%
43.48
-66%
189.83
47%
Sequential Read 256KB
264.3
199.68
-24%
283.37
7%
241.57
-9%
271.38
3%
737.65
179%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high22 fps
 very low30 fps
comparado com
Lenovo Moto E3 (min)
 MT6735P, Mali-T720
11
   ...
Honor 5X
 616 MSM8939v2, Adreno 405
21
Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime TF201
 3, GeForce ULP (Tegra 3)
22
Huawei P10 Lite
 Kirin 658, Mali-T830 MP2
22
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
22
Sony Xperia L1
 MT6737T, Mali-T720 MP2
22
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high51 fps
Carga Máxima
 33 °C30.6 °C30.8 °C 
 34.5 °C31.6 °C34.9 °C 
 33.5 °C31.7 °C34.4 °C 
Máximo: 34.9 °C
Médio: 32.8 °C
32.4 °C32.2 °C34.4 °C
32 °C32.4 °C35 °C
31.9 °C32.4 °C34.1 °C
Máximo: 35 °C
Médio: 33 °C
alimentação elétrica  32.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.62929.62528.428.628.43127.729.427.74028.832.828.85028.628.828.66325.72525.78024.925.424.910026.627.726.612534.228.734.216033.521.833.520043.621.843.625048.822.348.83155421.15440058.721.658.750060.921.360.963062.718.162.780065.220.365.2100067.319.667.3125069.419.569.4160073.616.373.6200074.116.174.1250075.715.675.7315075.415.575.4400068.115.468.1500072.615.172.6630074.115.274.1800076.215.176.21000076.815.176.81250070.71570.71600055.815.155.8SPL8529.785N59.61.359.6median 67.3Huawei P10 Litemedian 18.1median 67.3Delta11.63.311.631.636.625.431.525.331.732.931.133.627.131.631.528.429.32729.820.832.62240.821.344.720.85021.254.419.461.219.564.617.769.317.972.717.875.517.372.817.472.416.77117.272.118.272.817.969.117.663.717.760.517.856.717.959.718.15018.245.63082.61.351.2median 17.9Samsung Galaxy A3 2017median 61.21.31231.642.625.437.525.334.632.931.333.630.931.632.428.429.72728.420.829.22231.721.336.920.84621.252.319.455.819.559.117.760.817.966.617.871.517.37517.472.316.772.717.271.618.270.717.967.617.666.617.761.617.856.517.957.118.156.918.242.23081.91.346.3median 17.9Honor 6Xmedian 59.11.311hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei P10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.63 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Honor 6X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.14 / 0.17 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.38 / 1.87 / 1.92 Watt
Carga midlight 3.82 / 4.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P10 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
44%
-23%
2%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
0.38
0.37
3%
0.82
-116%
0.49
-29%
0.63
-66%
Idle Average *
1.87
0.78
58%
2
-7%
1.63
13%
1.91
-2%
Idle Maximum *
1.92
0.84
56%
2.03
-6%
1.76
8%
1.96
-2%
Load Average *
3.82
1.52
60%
3.34
13%
2.98
22%
3.88
-2%
Load Maximum *
4.9
2.75
44%
4.92
-0%
4.99
-2%
8.74
-78%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
23h 30min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
11h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 46min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 46min
Huawei P10 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3000 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Battery Runtime
65%
47%
30%
0%
4%
Reader / Idle
1410
2862
103%
2250
60%
2048
45%
1226
-13%
1540
9%
H.264
586
988
69%
885
51%
732
25%
775
32%
582
-1%
WiFi v1.3
665
668
0%
957
44%
820
23%
735
11%
966
45%
Load
286
532
86%
375
31%
366
28%
201
-30%
176
-38%

Pro

+ Construção de alta qualidade
+ Dual-SIM
+ LTE e NFC
+ Muito veloz WLAN de 5 GHz
+ Câmera de alta qualidade
+ Boa tela
+ Boas durações da bateria
+ Baixa temperatura
+ Sem afogamentos

Contra

- Sem porta USB Type-C
- Dual-SIM híbrido apenas
- Não suporta App2SD
- Firmware inchado
- Nem todos os jogos rodam fluentemente

A Huawei não prometeu muito: O P10 Lite é uma verdadeira alternativa para o caro P10 de quase 600-Euros (~$636). Como o seu parente de gama alta, a gama média convence com uma excelente construção, que o faz parecer muito mais caro do que imaginaríamos considerando seu atual preço de rua de cerca de 350 Euros (~$371) no momento do teste. Embora o P10 Lite não possua a câmera Leica do Huawei P10, uma câmera de 12-Megapixels que ganha pontos com uma qualidade de imagem surpreendente demonstra ser uma alternativa digna. 

Também gostamos da tela brilhante e dos recursos como o veloz WLAN, LTE Cat.6, bem como a opção de operar dois cartões SIM no smartphone, embora tenhamos que renunciar ao slot microSD por ele. As durações da bateria são razoáveis e devem bastar para que o usuário chegue até o final do dia sem problemas. 

Se não for por um processador extra rápido e uma câmera Leica como no Huawei P10, pode valer a penas dar uma olhada no Huawei P10 Lite. Com 350 Euros (~$371), o smartphone de gama média de 5,2 polegadas oferece o preço de entrada mais acessível para a série de produtos P10.

A Huawei economizou na porta USB-2.0, que é o mais altigo conector Micro-USB em vez do Type-C. Infelizmente, não pode se instalar aplicativos no cartão microSD - uma pena, considerando o firmware extenso que reduz o armazenamento de 32 GB para apenas 20 GB. Pelo menos quase todos os aplicativos pré-instalados podem ser removidos do smartphone para liberar um pouco de espaço. Não há quase nada de errado com o desempenho do SoC. "Quase" porque ao utilizar o Huawei P10 Lite para jogos, os detalhes gráficos possivelmente devam ser reduzidos para que a tela possa rodá-lo fluentemente. 

In review: Huawei P10 Lite. Test unit provided by Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Huawei P10 Lite. Test unit provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

Huawei did not promise too much: The P10 Lite is a real alternative to the expensive, almost 600-Euro (~$636), P10. As its high-end relative, the mid-range convinces with an excellent build, which make it look considerably more expensive than one would imagine considering its current street price of around 350 Euros (~$371) at the time of testing. Though the P10 Lite doesn't have the Leica camera of the Huawei P10, a 12-Megapixel camera that scores with a surprisingly high image quality proves to be a worthy alternative. 

We also liked the bright display and features like the fast WLAN, LTE Cat.6, as well as the option to operate two SIM cards in the smartphone, although one has to give up the microSD slot for it. The battery runtimes are reasonable and should last the user through a complete day without any problems. 

If it doesn't have to be an extra fast processor and a Leica camera optics as in the Huawei P10, it is worth taking a look at the Huawei P10 Lite. At 350 Euros (~$371), the mid-range 5.2-inch smartphone offers the most affordable entry into the P10 product series.

Huawai saved on the USB-2.0 port, which with its older Micro-USB connector instead of Type-C, invites playing the jolly "oh, I got it upside down" game. Unfortunately, apps cannot be installed on the microSD card - a shame, considering the markedly extensive firmware that reduces the 32 GB storage to a mere 20 GB. At least almost all the pre-installed apps can be cleaned off the smartphone to free some storage. There is almost nothing wrong with the SoC performance. "Almost" since when you use the Huawei P10 Lite for gaming, the graphics details possibly have to be reduced for the display to keep running fluidly. 

Huawei P10 Lite - 04/12/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
71 / 75 → 94%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 70%
Peso
93%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
21 / 63 → 33%
Desempenho da aplicação
50 / 70 → 71%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
76%
Médio
75%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P10 Lite
Manuel Masiero, 2017-04-16 (Update: 2017-04-17)