Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P10 Plus

Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/18/2017

Desempenho impulsionado? O Huawei P10 Plus é o irmão maior e melhor equipado do smartphone P10 de gama alta da Huawei que alcançou uma avaliação “Muito Boa” em nossa classificação. Serpa que o P10 Plus de 5,5 polegadas fará um trabalho ainda melhor? Nós o colocamos à prova.

Huawei P10 Plus (P10 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 960
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Memória
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 540 PPI, LTPS, tela táctil capacitiva, 10 pontos multi-touch, Knuckle Touch, LTPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões micro-SD de máx. 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: digitais, giroscópio, acelerômetro, bússola, proximidade, Hall magnet, IV, Miracast, DLNA, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct, Galileo, GLONASS, BeiDou
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (bandas 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE Cat. 12 (bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 38, 39, 40), downloads max. 600 MBit/s, uploads max. 100 MBit/s, head-SAR 0.89 W/kg, body-SAR 0.76 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7 x 153.5 x 74.2
Bateria
3750 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Huawei SuperCharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix 20 MP monochrome + 12 MP RGB Leica dual camera, Summilux-H 1:1.8/27 ASPH, OIS, autofoc híbrido (reconhecimento facial, contraste, laser, e autofoco de profundidade), zweifarbiger Blitz, 4K-Videoaufnahmen
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix F/1.9, AF
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de energia modular, cabo USB Type-C, ferramenta SIM, fones, carcaça, guia de início rápido, EMUI 5.1, 36 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
165 g, Suprimento de energia: 45 g
Preço
700 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
368 MBit/s ∼100% +802%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s ∼88% +697%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼84% +655%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼70% +530%
Huawei P10 Plus
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
40.8 MBit/s ∼11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼100% +413%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼52% +168%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼48% +145%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s ∼34% +72%
Huawei P10 Plus
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
128 MBit/s ∼20%
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
542
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
582
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 586 cd/m² Médio: 561.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.93 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 568 cd/m²
Contraste: 1321:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.37
Huawei P10 Plus
LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.5
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
22%
-32%
-100%
17%
-10%
-1%
Brightness
562
553
-2%
556
-1%
430
-23%
562
0%
611
9%
490
-13%
Brightness Distribution
92
97
5%
86
-7%
84
-9%
93
1%
89
-3%
92
0%
Black Level *
0.43
0.35
19%
0.43
-0%
0.23
47%
Contrast
1321
1591
20%
1272
-4%
2809
113%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
1.4
42%
4.8
-100%
7.1
-196%
1.7
29%
4.5
-88%
2.1
12%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
1.3
48%
4.5
-80%
6.8
-172%
1.6
36%
6
-140%
2.6
-4%
Gamma
2.37 101%
2.21 109%
2.39 100%
2.23 108%
2.13 113%
2.27 106%
2.23 108%
CCT
6779 96%
6667 97%
7194 90%
7866 83%
6435 101%
7996 81%
6843 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.1
81.57
67.74
88.14
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.83
99.87
99.05
100

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
138326 Points ∼61%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points ∼73% +20%
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼61% +1%
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼70% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼73% +20%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼67% +10%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼57% -7%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
6267 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼36% +7%
LG G6
4369 Points ∼24% -30%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
1852 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼42% +9%
LG G6
1831 Points ∼38% -1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
1679 Points ∼55%
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼63% +13%
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼57% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼81% +47%
LG G6
1955 Points ∼65% +16%
Lenovo Moto Z
1797 Points ∼59% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
1767 Points ∼33%
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼45% +36%
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼45% +37%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼65% +97%
LG G6
2980 Points ∼55% +69%
Lenovo Moto Z
2336 Points ∼43% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
1747 Points ∼45%
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼59% +30%
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼57% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼82% +82%
LG G6
2669 Points ∼69% +53%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼56% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
1662 Points ∼55%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1522 Points ∼51% -8%
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼73% +32%
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼48% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼82% +48%
LG G6
1961 Points ∼65% +18%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼61% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
2469 Points ∼32%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
4235 Points ∼55% +72%
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼36% +14%
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼43% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼62% +94%
LG G6
4121 Points ∼53% +67%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼48% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
2229 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3034 Points ∼61% +36%
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼53% +19%
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼52% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼80% +78%
LG G6
3282 Points ∼66% +47%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼61% +36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
14934 Points ∼21%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
15626 Points ∼22% +5%
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼21% +3%
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼31% +50%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼29% +40%
LG G6
22335 Points ∼31% +50%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼29% +40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
33307 Points ∼7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
63386 Points ∼14% +90%
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼8% +8%
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼8% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼7% -1%
LG G6
32128 Points ∼7% -4%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼6% -20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
26156 Points ∼13%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
37746 Points ∼19% +44%
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼14% +6%
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼16% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼15% +12%
LG G6
29276 Points ∼15% +12%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼13% -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
56 fps ∼4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
91.96 fps ∼7% +64%
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼5% +23%
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼7% +63%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼8% +86%
LG G6
75 fps ∼6% +34%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼6% +38%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
40 fps ∼9%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.71 fps ∼13% +44%
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼12% +38%
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼13% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% +45%
LG G6
46 fps ∼10% +15%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼12% +33%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
19 fps ∼3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.71 fps ∼11% +209%
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼6% +58%
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼8% +142%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% +163%
LG G6
38 fps ∼7% +100%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼8% +116%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
29 fps ∼8%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.17 fps ∼15% +90%
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼9% +10%
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼12% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10% +31%
LG G6
27 fps ∼7% -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼7% -10%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
22 fps ∼5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps ∼10% +88%
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼6% +9%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼8% +45%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼10% +91%
LG G6
29 fps ∼7% +32%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼6% +23%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
12 fps ∼7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps ∼24% +246%
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼14% +108%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼18% +167%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% +92%
LG G6
16 fps ∼9% +33%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼9% +25%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
7377 Points ∼89%
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼88% 0%
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼68% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼70% -21%
LG G6
5703 Points ∼69% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼92% +4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
1054 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points ∼100% +46%
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼70% +2%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼58% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼75% +10%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼70% +2%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼62% -9%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
3438 Points ∼40%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points ∼80% +100%
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼48% +20%
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼52% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼71% +78%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼60% +49%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼50% +26%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
3331 Points ∼75%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points ∼30% -60%
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼63% -17%
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼44% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼71% -6%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼44% -42%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼50% -34%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
3572 Points ∼54%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points ∼100% +84%
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼58% +7%
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼48% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼81% +49%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼55% +2%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼52% -5%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
2563 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points ∼82% +21%
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼69% +2%
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼59% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼87% +29%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼66% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼62% -8%

Legend

 
Huawei P10 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
10213 Points ∼21%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
26053 Points ∼53% +155%
Huawei P10
10236 Points ∼21% 0%
OnePlus 3T
9798 Points ∼20% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points ∼28% +38%
LG G6
9113 Points ∼18% -11%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points ∼16% -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
3107 ms * ∼5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1102.7 ms * ∼2% +65%
Huawei P10
3128.7 ms * ∼5% -1%
OnePlus 3T
2719.3 ms * ∼5% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2236.7 ms * ∼4% +28%
LG G6
2464.2 ms * ∼4% +21%
Lenovo Moto Z
3154.7 ms * ∼5% -2%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
140 Points ∼19%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points ∼27% +46%
Huawei P10
136 Points ∼18% -3%
OnePlus 3T
135 Points ∼18% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points ∼20% +10%
LG G6
122 Points ∼16% -13%
Lenovo Moto Z
112 Points ∼15% -20%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
58.427 Points ∼18%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
168.08 Points ∼50% +188%
Huawei P10
57.9 Points ∼17% -1%
OnePlus 3T
54.526 Points ∼16% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
62.198 Points ∼19% +6%
LG G6
56.628 Points ∼17% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points ∼14% -19%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P10 PlusHuawei P10OnePlus 3TSamsung Galaxy S8 PlusLG G6Lenovo Moto Z
AndroBench 3-5
0%
-32%
-0%
-18%
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
33.61
32.19
-4%
57.24
70%
53.33
59%
45.64
36%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
54.04
54.22
0%
71.12
32%
77.61
44%
78.51
45%
Random Write 4KB
149.78
152.31
2%
74.39
-50%
15.27
-90%
16.58
-89%
74.93
-50%
Random Read 4KB
173.06
168.42
-3%
123.57
-29%
127.18
-27%
95.19
-45%
117.15
-32%
Sequential Write 256KB
182.64
189.83
4%
165.3
-9%
194.18
6%
122.85
-33%
168.32
-8%
Sequential Read 256KB
732.94
737.65
1%
436.43
-40%
787.6
7%
428.67
-42%
439.66
-40%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
comparado com
Lenovo Moto E3 (min)
 MT6735P, Mali-T720
11
   ...
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
30
LG G6
 821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
30
Huawei P10 Plus
 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8
30
BQ Aquaris X Pro
 626, Adreno 506
30
Sony Xperia XA1
 Helio P20 MT6757, Mali-T880 MP2
30
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high56 fps
Carga Máxima
 48.2 °C47.3 °C44.9 °C 
 48.3 °C47.3 °C49.1 °C 
 47 °C46.5 °C48.8 °C 
Máximo: 49.1 °C
Médio: 47.5 °C
40.9 °C43.2 °C44.1 °C
41.2 °C42.4 °C44.2 °C
40.7 °C42.6 °C44.1 °C
Máximo: 44.2 °C
Médio: 42.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.22525.433.13125.329.94032.9255033.629.26331.631.28028.426.9100272612520.833.91602243.520021.349.925020.854.831521.257.540019.462.350019.566.463017.767.380017.964100017.863.2125017.364.9160017.462.5200016.756.3250017.260315018.261400017.963.2500017.662.8630017.760.3800017.861.61000017.962.51250018.164.51600018.255.8SPL3075.6N1.336.8median 17.9Huawei P10 Plusmedian 61.6Delta1.34.831.639.925.439.825.339.732.934.733.634.731.632.728.427.82726.420.828.62241.521.350.520.855.921.260.319.46519.568.617.766.817.964.417.866.917.371.517.473.516.774.517.273.718.272.217.970.517.670.717.764.817.860.417.95918.148.418.232.83082.71.352.3median 17.9Huawei P10median 64.81.310.626.428.426.42826.72825.828.725.829.133.229.126.12626.123.925.523.927.724.727.733.426.933.441.53741.540.320.240.343.720.243.745.521.845.547224752.822.252.860.121.860.166.517.266.569.217.869.271.619.871.669.919.169.96815.46869.515.669.56614.96671.514.771.571.214.271.272.21472.271.213.971.26713.86758.913.958.952.413.952.454.713.754.781.529.581.549.91.349.9median 66Apple iPhone 7 Plusmedian 17.2median 6610.93.810.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.07 / 0.33 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.03 / 2.61 / 2.83 Watt
Carga midlight 7.03 / 10.08 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P10 Plus
3750 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Power Consumption
23%
15%
21%
46%
30%
44%
Idle Minimum *
1.03
0.77
25%
0.83
19%
0.61
41%
0.68
34%
0.62
40%
0.66
36%
Idle Average *
2.61
2.04
22%
2.1
20%
1.77
32%
1.13
57%
1.43
45%
1.01
61%
Idle Maximum *
2.83
2.24
21%
2.18
23%
1.81
36%
1.16
59%
1.48
48%
1.09
61%
Load Average *
7.03
4.69
33%
6.57
7%
6.67
5%
4.69
33%
5.52
21%
3.97
44%
Load Maximum *
10.08
8.66
14%
9.32
8%
10.98
-9%
5.24
48%
10.47
-4%
8.34
17%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
27h 35min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
12h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 36min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 54min
Huawei P10 Plus
3750 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
6%
-1%
5%
12%
12%
4%
Reader / Idle
1655
1835
11%
1540
-7%
1423
-14%
1565
-5%
1789
8%
1371
-17%
H.264
756
813
8%
582
-23%
810
7%
742
-2%
779
3%
724
-4%
WiFi v1.3
760
587
-23%
966
27%
494
-35%
736
-3%
692
-9%
407
-46%
Load
174
225
29%
176
1%
282
62%
275
58%
252
45%
320
84%

Pro

+ Design elegante, carcaça de alta qualidade
+ SoC muito veloz
+ Armazenamento UFS 2.1 de 128 GB
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ 6 GB de RAM
+ Muito boa dual câmera Leica
+ Tela WQHD muito brilhante
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Bons alto-falantes estéreo
+ Carga rápida via SuperCharge
+ Até 3 anos de garantia

Contra

- O armazenamento é uma questão de azar.
- O firmware reserva muito armazenamento
- Sem App2SD
- Wi-Fi lento
- Taxas de transferência micro-SD moderadas
- Afogamentos durante uso intenso
In review: Huawei P10 Plus (VKY-L09). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Huawei P10 Plus (VKY-L09). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Como com o Huawei P10 de 5,1 polegadas, não há muito que criticar no maior Huawei P10 Plus de 5,5 polegadas. O P10 Plus também vem com abundantes componentes de gama alta - começando com a carcaça impecavelmente construída sobre o armazenamento UFS 2.1 e LTE Cat.12 até o rápido SoC HiSilicon Kirin 960.

Sem dúvida, o P10 Plus da Huawei é um excelente smartphone de gama premium. No entanto, não se destaca decisivamente do Huawei P10 mais barato, apesar da sua configuração superior.

Em comparação com o P10 de 600 Euros (~ $646), ele vem com alguns extras a um preço oficial de 749 euros (~ $700). Ele vem com 6 GB de RAM, 128 GB de armazenamento, uma resolução WQHD em vez de Full HD, uma bateria mais potente e uma câmera Leica dupla ligeiramente melhorada. Essas melhorias tornam o P10 Plus melhor do que o P10 no papel, mas elas não são muito notórias na prática. Além do formato obviamente maior, as diferenças de desempenho são, em última análise, muito insignificantes.

De outra maneira, é um smartphone ainda muito bom que, no entanto, vem com as mesmas deficiências do Huawei P10. Estas incluem o módulo Wi-Fi fraco, o slot microSD lento, o afogamento durante uso intenso, o firmware que consome o armazenamento e o problema de qual memória foi instalada no dispositivo no momento do teste. Provavelmente é um jogo de azar se o comprador obtém um modelo com o veloz armazenamento UFS ou o lento eMMC.

Huawei P10 Plus - 06/06/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
92%
Teclado
71 / 75 → 94%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
48 / 60 → 81%
Peso
91%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
56 / 63 → 88%
Desempenho da aplicação
58 / 70 → 83%
Temperatura
78%
Ruído
100%
Audio
81 / 91 → 89%
Camera
81%
Médio
80%
89%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P10 Plus
Manuel Masiero, 2017-06-18 (Update: 2017-06-22)