Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia 1: É preciso mais do que apenas uma tela sofisticada para desafiar os carros-chefes estabelecidos

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/12/2019

Um cinema em seu bolso? A Sony apresenta o Xperia 1 como o primeiro smartphone com uma tela OLED 4K e HDR com uma relação de aspecto de 21:9. Cinema pronto? Bem, há mais no Xperia 1 do que isso. O Xperia 1 é um ótimo smartphone, mas só pode ser ideal para algumas pessoas. Continue lendo para descobrir por que

Sony Xperia 1 (Xperia Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Memória
6144 MB 
Pantalha
6.5 polegadas 21:9, 3840 x 1644 pixel 643 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, OLED, CinemaWide, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, Brilhante: sim, HDR
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 105 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, Card Reader: Cartões microSDXC de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, barômetro, e-compass, vetor de rotação geomagnética, giroscópio, sensor hall, magnetômetro, sensor RGBC-IR, USB Type-C, OTG, status LED, Miracast
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. UMTS/HSPA+/3G: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19. LTE/4G: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 167 x 72
Bateria
3330 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix , f/1.6, 26 mm, 1/2.6 ", 1.4 μm, 5-axis. 12 MP telephoto lens, f/2.4, 52 mm, 1/3.4", 1.0 μm, 2x optical zoom, 5-axis. 12 MP ultrawide, f/2.4, 16 mm, 1/3.4", 1.0 μm. Camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/2.0, 24 mm, 1/4", 1.0 μm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, guia de início rápido, cartão de garantia, Sony UI, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR: Head - 1.12 W/kg. LTE Cat.19. DRM Widevine: L1, fanless
peso
178 g, Suprimento de energia: 48 g
Preço
949 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Sony Xperia 1
Sony Xperia 1
Sony Xperia 1
Sony Xperia 1
Sony Xperia 1
Sony Xperia 1
Sony Xperia 1
Sony Xperia 1
Sony Xperia 1
Sony Xperia 1

Size Comparison

167 mm 72 mm 8.2 mm 178 g162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g158.01 mm 73.37 mm 8.41 mm 192 g157.6 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 198 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (min: 624, max: 683) MBit/s ∼97% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 561, max: 684) MBit/s ∼93% +3%
Sony Xperia 1
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
617 (min: 356, max: 662) MBit/s ∼91%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
467 (min: 375, max: 519) MBit/s ∼69% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=409)
222 MBit/s ∼33% -64%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
670 (min: 542, max: 717) MBit/s ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼80% +1%
Sony Xperia 1
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
531 (min: 414, max: 620) MBit/s ∼79%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 438, max: 506) MBit/s ∼70% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 (min: 398, max: 508) MBit/s ∼68% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=409)
212 MBit/s ∼32% -60%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø617 (356-662)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø531 (414-620)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS test: Sony Xperia 1 - Overview
GPS test: Sony Xperia 1 - Overview
GPS test: Sony Xperia 1 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Sony Xperia 1 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Sony Xperia 1 - Loop
GPS test: Sony Xperia 1 - Loop
Camera Settings
Camera Settings
Camera UI
Camera UI
Camera UI
Photographed with the 12 MP main rear-facing camera
Photographed with the 12 MP main rear-facing camera
Photographed using 2x optical zoom
Photographed using 2x optical zoom
Photographed using the wide-angle sensor
Photographed using the wide-angle sensor

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
A photo of our test chart shot in low-light
544
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
544
cd/m²
544
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 546 cd/m² Médio: 542.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.08 cd/m²
iluminação: 99 %
iluminação com acumulador: 541 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Sony Xperia 1
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.5
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4
Huawei P30 Pro
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
OnePlus 7 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
-139%
-51%
-25%
-7%
Brightness middle
541
710
31%
597
10%
586
8%
593
10%
Brightness
543
721
33%
608
12%
584
8%
587
8%
Brightness Distribution
99
97
-2%
89
-10%
97
-2%
94
-5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.8
3.7
-363%
2.2
-175%
1.39
-74%
0.9
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
1.7
10.3
-506%
3.6
-112%
2.7
-59%
2
-18%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.2
1.5
-25%
1.6
-33%
1.6
-33%
1.5
-25%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.1 105%
2.23 99%
2.243 98%
2.27 97%
CCT
6601 98%
6611 98%
6268 104%
6672 97%
6548 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9429 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.1 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7509 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10177 Points ∼100% +36%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8574 Points ∼84% +14%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7470 Points ∼73% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼74% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7372 - 8024, n=10)
7597 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=308)
4570 Points ∼45% -39%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11172 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10259 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9880 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10812 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10187 - 11388, n=11)
10932 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=363)
4556 Points ∼41% -59%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3506 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4505 Points ∼100% +28%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3306 Points ∼73% -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3472 Points ∼77% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼78% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3406 - 3537, n=11)
3487 Points ∼77% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=365)
1357 Points ∼30% -61%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8760 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7812 Points ∼78% -11%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9135 Points ∼92% +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9974 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼91% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=10)
9581 Points ∼96% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=358)
5003 Points ∼50% -43%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10747 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9793 Points ∼75% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12996 Points ∼100% +21%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
11766 Points ∼91% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼85% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=10)
12092 Points ∼93% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=526)
5472 Points ∼42% -49%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2104 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2488 Points ∼75% +18%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3183 Points ∼96% +51%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3317 Points ∼100% +58%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼99% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2104 - 3365, n=10)
3011 Points ∼91% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1779 - 15735, n=45)
2441 Points ∼74% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5007 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5530 Points ∼95% +10%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4688 Points ∼81% -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5794 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼99% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4236 - 5862, n=10)
5533 Points ∼95% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (209 - 14536, n=45)
2464 Points ∼43% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3832 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4348 Points ∼88% +13%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4242 Points ∼85% +11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼99% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3800 - 5012, n=10)
4649 Points ∼94% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (260 - 14786, n=48)
2128 Points ∼43% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1934 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2925 Points ∼66% +51%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4171 Points ∼94% +116%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4429 Points ∼100% +129%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼85% +94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 4535, n=10)
3778 Points ∼85% +95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=373)
1833 Points ∼41% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5674 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5371 Points ∼75% -5%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4361 Points ∼61% -23%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7115 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼99% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7115, n=10)
6745 Points ∼95% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=373)
1600 Points ∼22% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3969 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼72% +14%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4317 Points ∼69% +9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6270 Points ∼100% +58%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼94% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6312, n=10)
5698 Points ∼91% +44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=376)
1487 Points ∼24% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2345 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3087 Points ∼71% +32%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4164 Points ∼96% +78%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4352 Points ∼100% +86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼87% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2345 - 4703, n=9)
3943 Points ∼91% +68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=387)
1808 Points ∼42% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9158 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4449 Points ∼43% -51%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5767 Points ∼55% -37%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10420 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼99% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6358 - 10420, n=9)
9714 Points ∼93% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=387)
2198 Points ∼21% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5552 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4052 Points ∼51% -27%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5313 Points ∼67% -4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7955 Points ∼100% +43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼94% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5268 - 8141, n=9)
7281 Points ∼92% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=388)
1864 Points ∼23% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2705 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2977 Points ∼73% +10%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3849 Points ∼95% +42%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4063 Points ∼100% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼92% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4320, n=10)
3759 Points ∼93% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=449)
1763 Points ∼43% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5663 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼82% -8%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4400 Points ∼69% -22%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6248 Points ∼98% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5663 - 6362, n=10)
6227 Points ∼98% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=451)
1326 Points ∼21% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4556 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4452 Points ∼80% -2%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4264 Points ∼76% -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5581 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼99% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5734, n=10)
5412 Points ∼97% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=459)
1264 Points ∼23% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3656 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2875 Points ∼70% -21%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3828 Points ∼94% +5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4091 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼88% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3505 - 4454, n=9)
3930 Points ∼96% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=481)
1671 Points ∼41% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9447 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5303 Points ∼53% -44%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5431 Points ∼55% -43%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9845 Points ∼99% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6122 - 10008, n=9)
9436 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=481)
1804 Points ∼18% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7197 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4465 Points ∼60% -38%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4969 Points ∼66% -31%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7501 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5251 - 7820, n=9)
7198 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=489)
1545 Points ∼21% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
28223 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32302 Points ∼100% +14%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31483 Points ∼97% +12%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
26936 Points ∼83% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼78% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (23877 - 45072, n=9)
31887 Points ∼99% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=641)
13645 Points ∼42% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
105718 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
70318 Points ∼66% -33%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
63469 Points ∼59% -40%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106829 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (106770 - 110432, n=9)
94164 Points ∼88% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11427 - 162695, n=641)
20036 Points ∼19% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65656 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55740 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
51779 Points ∼79% -21%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
64389 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (69203 - 83518, n=9)
61193 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=642)
16606 Points ∼25% -75%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
96 fps ∼57% -43%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
138 fps ∼83% -17%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (85 - 167, n=11)
159 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=669)
35 fps ∼21% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
58 fps ∼92% -3%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps ∼96% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (59 - 91, n=11)
62.8 fps ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=672)
26.9 fps ∼43% -55%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼66% -33%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
91 fps ∼90% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
101 fps ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (50 - 102, n=11)
95.5 fps ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=588)
19.3 fps ∼19% -81%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼87% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps ∼97% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
55 fps ∼91% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51 - 85, n=11)
60.6 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=593)
17.8 fps ∼29% -70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
55 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼94% +22%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
56 fps ∼79% +2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼97% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (35 - 71, n=11)
62.5 fps ∼88% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=449)
15.9 fps ∼22% -71%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼64% -10%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
47 fps ∼81% +15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36 fps ∼62% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=11)
49 fps ∼84% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=452)
15.2 fps ∼26% -63%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼67% -6%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps ∼83% +18%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
15 fps ∼63% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (14 - 26, n=10)
21.9 fps ∼91% +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=152)
8.97 fps ∼37% -47%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼77% -23%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼64% -36%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
16 fps ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 22, n=11)
16.2 fps ∼74% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=152)
6.2 fps ∼28% -72%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
34 fps ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼70% -24%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼86% -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
23 fps ∼62% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 38, n=10)
34 fps ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=154)
13.5 fps ∼36% -60%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼100% +10%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
36 fps ∼78% -14%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼91% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼89% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=11)
40.2 fps ∼87% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=153)
14.8 fps ∼32% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼100% +2%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
33 fps ∼77% -21%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 42, n=11)
40.1 fps ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=378)
10.7 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼61% -30%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
27 fps ∼71% -18%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼55% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 38, n=11)
32.2 fps ∼85% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=382)
9.65 fps ∼25% -71%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
334123 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
333277 Points ∼89% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
316199 Points ∼84% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
369294 Points ∼99% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (217967 - 398720, n=11)
351877 Points ∼94% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=271)
130644 Points ∼35% -61%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1300 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1383 Points ∼98% +6%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1409 Points ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1364 Points ∼97% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼98% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1171 - 1431, n=10)
1346 Points ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=601)
742 Points ∼53% -43%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9318 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8401 Points ∼89% -10%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7758 Points ∼82% -17%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9421 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9477, n=10)
9150 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=601)
1945 Points ∼21% -79%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2661 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4306 Points ∼82% +62%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5210 Points ∼99% +96%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5243 Points ∼100% +97%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼77% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2661 - 7500, n=10)
5081 Points ∼97% +91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=601)
1450 Points ∼28% -46%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8870 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8344 Points ∼91% -6%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8572 Points ∼94% -3%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9143 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼92% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=10)
8586 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=601)
2858 Points ∼31% -68%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4112 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4520 Points ∼91% +10%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4701 Points ∼94% +14%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4982 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼92% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5397, n=10)
4783 Points ∼96% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=605)
1421 Points ∼29% -65%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
62.5 Points ∼100% +5%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
60.469 Points ∼97% +2%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
59.453 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼92% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 63.1, n=9)
57 Points ∼91% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0)
44.128 Points ∼71% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (14.6 - 108, n=80)
30.8 Points ∼49% -48%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
67.8 runs/min ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼97% +2%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
64.2 runs/min ∼95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (46.7 - 67.9, n=8)
62.9 runs/min ∼93% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)
61.5 runs/min ∼91% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
56 runs/min ∼83% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=72)
34.7 runs/min ∼51% -46%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
122 Points ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
115 Points ∼94% +8%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
111 Points ∼91% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼89% +2%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
106 Points ∼87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (94 - 114, n=11)
106 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=133)
63.6 Points ∼52% -40%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
24730 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼99% +5%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
23318 Points ∼94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=11)
23123 Points ∼94% -1%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
22447 Points ∼91% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20849 Points ∼84% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=662)
6283 Points ∼25% -73%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=682)
10793 ms * ∼100% -429%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=10)
2122 ms * ∼20% -4%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
2039.9 ms * ∼19%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
2009.1 ms * ∼19% +2%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
1965 ms * ∼18% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼17% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1856.6 ms * ∼17% +9%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia 1Samsung Galaxy S10 PlusHuawei P30 ProOnePlus 7 ProXiaomi Mi 9Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
44%
153%
51%
166%
83%
-3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
27.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
118%
68.19 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
145%
61.5 (27.8 - 72.4, n=17)
121%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=403)
75%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
31.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
133%
82.6 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
164%
77 (31.3 - 88.2, n=17)
146%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=403)
113%
Random Write 4KB
24.16
22.7
-6%
159.22
559%
24.8
3%
165.32
584%
81.6 (18.2 - 250, n=38)
238%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=711)
-17%
Random Read 4KB
147.32
135.16
-8%
174.36
18%
174.1
18%
149.36
1%
137 (98.9 - 158, n=38)
-7%
44.8 (1.59 - 175, n=711)
-70%
Sequential Write 256KB
206.87
249.06
20%
250.82
21%
387
87%
388.27
88%
205 (182 - 503, n=38)
-1%
92.1 (2.99 - 503, n=711)
-55%
Sequential Read 256KB
749.82
811.17
8%
849.48
13%
1468
96%
666.06
-11%
741 (427 - 912, n=38)
-1%
258 (12.1 - 1468, n=711)
-66%
PUBG Mobile
01020304050Tooltip
: Ø39.9 (37-41)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
: Ø29.2 (26-31)
Carga Máxima
 36.4 °C35.9 °C32.5 °C 
 37 °C36.9 °C32.7 °C 
 37.1 °C35.7 °C32.3 °C 
Máximo: 37.1 °C
Médio: 35.2 °C
30.8 °C31.1 °C32.6 °C
30.6 °C31.7 °C34.3 °C
29.8 °C32.5 °C35.9 °C
Máximo: 35.9 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  24.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.242.42531.234.43127.223.74023.731.2503135.86322.7288022.825.110024.420.712520.922.416020.329.720019.131.825016.438.23151642.740017.652.450015.260.863014.669.380015.472.3100014.873.6125015.272.4160015.668.6200014.868.8250014.671315014.368.2400014.669.1500014.771.1630015.372.6800015.372.61000014.968.21250015.356.61600015.643.1SPL27.382.5N0.953.5median 15.3median 68.2Delta1.214.134.832.622.424.922.724.923.820.930.930.920.422.42320.821.123.416.936.317.853.315.650.614.855.616.262.714.364.513.865.913.769.814.869.814.673.414.974.713.975.414.276.313.875.714.678.515.578.314.478.814.277.215.174.415.271.515.167.614.863.526.787.80.872.7median 14.8median 69.80.69.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia 1Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia 1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.31 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1 / 1.48 / 1.56 Watt
Carga midlight 3.76 / 8.48 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia 1
3330 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-15%
-20%
-28%
11%
-9%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.73
27%
0.68
32%
0.9
10%
0.67
33%
0.917 (0.6 - 1.3, n=10)
8%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=743)
12%
Idle Average *
1.48
1.53
-3%
2.6
-76%
1.8
-22%
1.26
15%
1.555 (1.01 - 2.35, n=10)
-5%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=742)
-17%
Idle Maximum *
1.56
2.07
-33%
2.77
-78%
2.9
-86%
1.29
17%
1.933 (1.13 - 2.9, n=10)
-24%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=743)
-29%
Load Average *
3.76
6.03
-60%
3.74
1%
5.5
-46%
3.71
1%
4.55 (3.64 - 5.8, n=10)
-21%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=737)
-8%
Load Maximum *
8.48
9.18
-8%
6.82
20%
8.2
3%
9.3
-10%
8.76 (7.49 - 10.2, n=10)
-3%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=737)
31%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
17h 47min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 52min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 06min
Sony Xperia 1
3330 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
15%
71%
37%
25%
Reader / Idle
1067
1560
46%
1966
84%
1745
64%
1650
55%
H.264
712
921
29%
1193
68%
802
13%
1008
42%
WiFi v1.3
441
483
10%
838
90%
768
74%
546
24%
Load
246
187
-24%
344
40%
236
-4%
194
-21%

Pro

+ Fantástico painel OLED
+ Tela de alta resolução
+ Bem construído
+ Módulo GPS preciso
+ Boa conectividade
+ Desempenho impressionante

Contra

- Pouco conteúdo otimizado para uma tela 21: 9
- Câmera frontal
- Fotos com pouca luz decepcionantes
- Fraca atenuação de Wi-Fi
- Duração da bateria
- Slot para cartões microSD lento
- Sem carregamento sem fio
- Preço recomendado alto
- Liberação tardia
Sony Xperia 1 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Cyberport.de.
Sony Xperia 1 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Cyberport.de.

A Sony fez um bom trabalho com o Xperia 1. Tem uma tela atraente, é bem construída e tem um desempenho decente. No entanto, o dispositivo levou quase cinco meses para chegar ao mercado tendo sido revelado na MWC19 em fevereiro, o que torna seu preço sugerido de 950 euros (US$1.071) desagradável quando outros carros-chefe já começaram baixar seus preço. Enquanto você pode encontrar o Xperia 1 online por cerca de 900 Euros (~US$ 1.015), o Galaxy S10+ e o OnePlus 7 Pro caíram ainda mais para cerca de 700 Euros (~US$ 790). Da mesma forma, o P30 Pro despencou para apenas 650 Euros (~US$ 729) por causa da guerra comercial do governo dos EUA com a Huawei.

O Sony Xperia 1 é um companheiro ideal para quem gosta de assistir filmes em movimento. Existem melhores opções lá fora, embora você não se encaixe neste nicho.

Deixando o preço de lado, o Xperia 1 faz muitos compromissos para ser considerado uma séria oposição aos melhores carros-chefes de 2019. Acima de tudo está a tela 21:9. Parece ótimo e é prático para multitarefas, mas dificilmente há conteúdo otimizado para isso, forçando você a assistir a vídeos cortados ou com zoom. Nem são ideais e destacam que 21:9 atualmente tem mais desvantagens do que benefícios.

O Xperia 1 também não possui ótimas câmeras. O sensor frontal de 8 MP é inferior, assim como a fotografia com pouca luz do sensor principal de 12 MP traseiro. A omissão do carregamento sem fio é uma queixa menor, mas é uma que nos lembra que o Xperia 1 não é tão rico em recursos quanto seus rivais. Inexplicavelmente, a Sony incluiu uma bateria de 3.330 mAh, que nunca iria durar muito tempo ao alimentar uma tela 4K de 6,5 polegadas e um SoC Snapdragon 855.

Em suma, o Xperia 1 é um excelente smartphone em isolamento. Ele ganha muito pontos com o seu design, tela e desempenho, mas fica aquém ao compará-lo com outros smartphones carros-chefe mais ricos em recursos e normalmente, mais econômicos, lançados este ano.

Sony Xperia 1 - 07/04/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
88%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
44 / 60 → 73%
Peso
90%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
92%
Desempenho do jogos
71 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
77 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
80%
Médio
81%
89%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia 1: É preciso mais do que apenas uma tela sofisticada para desafiar os carros-chefes estabelecidos
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-07-12 (Update: 2019-07-13)