Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Apple iPhone XR

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/30/2018

Live Review – A Apple posiciona o iPhone XR entre os dois modelos XS em termos de tamanho, mas equipa o dispositivo com uma tela LCD de resolução mais baixa e apenas uma câmera traseira. Existem alguns outros pequenos inconvenientes, mas o XR faz o suficiente para ser coroado como o melhor iPhone em geral? Continue lendo para descobrir.

Apple iPhone XR (iPhone Serie)
Processador
Apple A12 Bionic
Placa gráfica
Apple A12 Bionic GPU
Memória
3072 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
6.1 polegadas 19.5:9, 1792 x 828 pixel 324 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, multitouch de dez pontos, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB 
, 116.93 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Lightning, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Giroscópio de 3 eixos, Acelerômetro, Barômetro, Bússola digital, Face ID, Sensor de Proximidade, Lightning-Port, eSIM, Galileo, QZSS
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/EDGE: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: 850, 900, 1,700/2,100, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. LTE: FDD Bands – 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 66; TDD Bands – 34, 38, 39, 40, 41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 150.9 x 75.7
Bateria
11.16 Wh, 2942 mAh Lítio-Ion, 3.79 V, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 25 h
Sistema Operativo
Apple iOS 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Wide angle: f/1.8, 1.4 μm, Focus Pixel, 6 lens elements, OIS, True Tone Flash, UHD Video at up to 60 FPS
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix f/2.2, Full HD em até 60 FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Charger, cabo Lighting, Fones, Guia de início rápido, Adesivo Apple, SIM tool, 12 Meses Garantia, Head SAR value: 0.99 W/kg, IP67 certified, Qi wireless charging, fanless
peso
194 g, Suprimento de energia: 46 g
Preço
909 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼97% +26%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
650 MBit/s ∼96% +26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼91% +19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼73% -5%
Apple iPhone XR
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
517 (min: 477, max: 528) MBit/s ∼77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=299)
208 MBit/s ∼31% -60%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼95% +3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼93% 0%
Apple iPhone XR
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
644 (min: 578, max: 672) MBit/s ∼93%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
587 MBit/s ∼84% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼75% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=299)
203 MBit/s ∼29% -68%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø516 (477-528)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø644 (578-672)

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8770 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
21070 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6219 Points ∼30% -70%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
14369 Points ∼68% -32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8938 Points ∼42% -58%
Average Apple A12 Bionic
21070 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=190)
4475 Points ∼21% -79%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
11276 Points ∼97%
Apple iPhone XS
11598 Points ∼100% +3%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
10558 Points ∼91% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
8786 Points ∼76% -22%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
9182 Points ∼79% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
10024 Points ∼86% -11%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (11244 - 11598, n=3)
11373 Points ∼98% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=241)
4284 Points ∼37% -62%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
4750 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone XS
4824 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
4263 Points ∼88% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3688 Points ∼76% -22%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2468 Points ∼51% -48%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
3378 Points ∼70% -29%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4750 - 4824, n=3)
4783 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=242)
1264 Points ∼26% -73%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9
5291 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
8101 Points ∼88%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
9225 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (7618 - 9868, n=249)
4524 Points ∼49%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9
5736 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
9664 Points ∼77%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
12535 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (3681 - 13211, n=417)
4935 Points ∼39%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
3030 Points ∼69%
Apple iPhone XS
2998 Points ∼69% -1%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2187 Points ∼50% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2590 Points ∼59% -15%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2257 Points ∼52% -26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4364 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2723 - 3030, n=3)
2917 Points ∼67% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (611 - 4439, n=271)
1707 Points ∼39% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
5061 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone XS
5139 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3325 Points ∼65% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3697 Points ∼72% -27%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4468 Points ∼87% -12%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4250 Points ∼83% -16%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4828 - 5139, n=3)
5009 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 8206, n=271)
1470 Points ∼29% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
4405 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone XS
4436 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2981 Points ∼67% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3376 Points ∼76% -23%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3669 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4275 Points ∼96% -3%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4121 - 4436, n=3)
4321 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 5189, n=274)
1363 Points ∼31% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
2880 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone XS
2952 Points ∼67% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2650 Points ∼60% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2832 Points ∼64% -2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4407 Points ∼100% +53%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2880 - 2961, n=3)
2931 Points ∼67% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=286)
1683 Points ∼38% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
14085 Points ∼94%
Apple iPhone XS
14951 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
4843 Points ∼32% -66%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6898 Points ∼46% -51%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5854 Points ∼39% -58%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (10374 - 14951, n=3)
13137 Points ∼88% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=286)
2065 Points ∼14% -85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
7555 Points ∼96%
Apple iPhone XS
7856 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
4091 Points ∼52% -46%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
5230 Points ∼67% -31%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5456 Points ∼69% -28%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (6667 - 7856, n=3)
7359 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=287)
1729 Points ∼22% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
3121 Points ∼75%
Apple iPhone XS
2960 Points ∼71% -5%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2109 Points ∼50% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2486 Points ∼59% -20%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2528 Points ∼60% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4183 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2960 - 3121, n=3)
3036 Points ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4216, n=346)
1639 Points ∼39% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
3806 Points ∼80%
Apple iPhone XS
3712 Points ∼78% -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3069 Points ∼65% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3553 Points ∼75% -7%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4746 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4206 Points ∼89% +11%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (3712 - 3806, n=3)
3748 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5241, n=346)
1187 Points ∼25% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
3629 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone XS
3514 Points ∼84% -3%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2781 Points ∼66% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3244 Points ∼77% -11%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3972 Points ∼95% +9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4201 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (3514 - 3629, n=3)
3562 Points ∼85% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=354)
1133 Points ∼27% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
2960 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2600 Points ∼63% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2720 Points ∼66% -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4150 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2713 - 2960, n=3)
1891 Points ∼46% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=378)
1532 Points ∼37% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
7806 Points ∼94%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
4569 Points ∼55% -41%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
8261 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5305 Points ∼64% -32%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (7055 - 7806, n=3)
4954 Points ∼60% -37%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8312, n=378)
1624 Points ∼20% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
5724 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3911 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
5687 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4996 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (5205 - 5724, n=3)
3643 Points ∼64% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 6454, n=386)
1380 Points ∼24% -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
27413 Points ∼75%
Apple iPhone XS
27400 Points ∼75% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points ∼70% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
26851 Points ∼73% -2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
34928 Points ∼95% +27%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
36755 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (27400 - 27717, n=3)
27510 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=533)
12822 Points ∼35% -53%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
162695 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
160199 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9
48433 Points ∼30% -70%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
82125 Points ∼50% -50%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
67730 Points ∼42% -58%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (159735 - 162695, n=3)
160876 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=533)
17894 Points ∼11% -89%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
77597 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
77128 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9
41093 Points ∼53% -47%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
63159 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
57047 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (77128 - 77599, n=3)
77441 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=534)
15022 Points ∼19% -81%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
232 fps ∼92%
Apple iPhone XS
251 fps ∼100% +8%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
166.9 fps ∼66% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S9
144 fps ∼57% -38%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
150 fps ∼60% -35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
120 fps ∼48% -48%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (226 - 251, n=3)
236 fps ∼94% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=557)
30.9 fps ∼12% -87%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
60 fps ∼50%
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
119.4 fps ∼100% +99%
Samsung Galaxy S9
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
61 fps ∼51% +2%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (60 - 60, n=3)
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=560)
24.7 fps ∼21% -59%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
132 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
115 fps ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
71 fps ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S9
73 fps ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
71 fps ∼54% -46%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
73 fps ∼55% -45%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (107 - 132, n=3)
118 fps ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=479)
16.6 fps ∼13% -87%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
60 fps ∼76%
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼76% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
79.2 fps ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S9
45 fps ∼57% -25%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
58 fps ∼73% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
42 fps ∼53% -30%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (59 - 60, n=3)
59.7 fps ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=482)
15.8 fps ∼20% -74%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
88 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
62 fps ∼70% -30%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
49 fps ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S9
46 fps ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼40% -60%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
29 fps ∼33% -67%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (62 - 88, n=3)
73.1 fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 88, n=342)
14.1 fps ∼16% -84%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
60 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
48 fps ∼80% -20%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
56.4 fps ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
24 fps ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
54 fps ∼90% -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
26 fps ∼43% -57%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (48 - 60, n=3)
55.6 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=345)
13.7 fps ∼23% -77%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
59 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
35 fps ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
22 fps ∼37% -63%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
19 fps ∼32% -68%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (32.1 - 59, n=3)
42 fps ∼71% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (2.7 - 59, n=54)
10.4 fps ∼18% -82%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
20 fps ∼91%
Apple iPhone XS
22 fps ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
14 fps ∼64% -30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
13 fps ∼59% -35%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (16.3 - 22, n=3)
19.4 fps ∼88% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 22, n=54)
6.23 fps ∼28% -69%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
59 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
41 fps ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
31 fps ∼53% -47%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
18 fps ∼31% -69%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (41 - 59, n=3)
49 fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 59, n=54)
14.7 fps ∼25% -75%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
63 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
48 fps ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
32 fps ∼51% -49%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
33 fps ∼52% -48%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (36.8 - 63, n=3)
49.3 fps ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 63, n=54)
16.2 fps ∼26% -74%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
54 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
38 fps ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9
28 fps ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼65% -35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
31 fps ∼57% -43%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (38 - 54, n=3)
44 fps ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 54, n=274)
9.86 fps ∼18% -82%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
58 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
31 fps ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy S9
14 fps ∼24% -76%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
33 fps ∼57% -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
16 fps ∼28% -72%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (31 - 58, n=3)
40 fps ∼69% -31%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 58, n=277)
8.88 fps ∼15% -85%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
24.51 (min: 11.54, max: 48.55) fps ∼76%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
29.12 (min: 9.74, max: 74.17) fps ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 651, n=36)
32.4 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
15.8 (min: 10.44, max: 44.6) fps ∼55%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
16.92 (min: 6.06, max: 28.78) fps ∼59%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 606, n=34)
28.8 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
21.26 (min: 11.26, max: 61.24) fps ∼59%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
25.57 (min: 7.38, max: 46.96) fps ∼71%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 739, n=32)
36.1 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
348178 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
243861 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
263165 Points ∼76%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
300617 Points ∼86%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (302955 - 348178, n=2)
325567 Points ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=165)
117556 Points ∼34%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
218158 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S9
217950 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
227026 Points ∼91%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
250848 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=384)
75469 Points ∼30%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4731 Score ∼94%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5025 Score ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 5025, n=39)
1773 Score ∼35%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
1722 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
1711 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
1099 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
1296 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
1424 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (1711 - 1731, n=3)
1721 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=494)
695 Points ∼40% -60%
Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
15969 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
15875 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6373 Points ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
7945 Points ∼50% -50%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6273 Points ∼39% -61%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (15659 - 15969, n=3)
15834 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=494)
1728 Points ∼11% -89%
Memory (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
3263 Points ∼52%
Apple iPhone XS
4169 Points ∼66% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2669 Points ∼42% -18%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3239 Points ∼52% -1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6283 Points ∼100% +93%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (1815 - 4169, n=3)
3082 Points ∼49% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=494)
1237 Points ∼20% -62%
System (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
11946 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone XS
12202 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6234 Points ∼51% -48%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6506 Points ∼53% -46%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8604 Points ∼71% -28%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (11675 - 12202, n=3)
11941 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=494)
2491 Points ∼20% -79%
Overall (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
5721 Points ∼94%
Apple iPhone XS
6097 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3285 Points ∼54% -43%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3838 Points ∼63% -33%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4687 Points ∼77% -18%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4895 - 6097, n=3)
5571 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=498)
1246 Points ∼20% -78%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR
2754 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
2606 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9
1436 Points ∼52% -48%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
1571 Points ∼57% -43%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2407 - 2754, n=3)
2589 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=76)
693 Points ∼25% -75%

Legend

 
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
 
Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
The Apple iPhone XR Live Review
The Apple iPhone XR Live Review

O Apple iPhone XR tem muito a ver com isso. Além disso, a tela de resolução mais baixa é um pouco mais segura, já que é efetivamente mais nítida que as telas OLED no XS e no XS Max. Além disso, a tela do XR não possui PWM, que afeta seus irmãos mais caros.

Além disso, é pouco provável que a economia de custos da Apple faça diferença no uso diário, seja na classificação IP mais fraca, no desempenho mais lento de LTE e Wi-Fi ou na menor quantidade de RAM. Esperamos que o único comprometimento perceptível seja a falta do zoom óptico.

Em última análise, o XR deve provar sua bateria antes de podermos recomendar o dispositivo. No entanto, o XR parece uma ótima alternativa para os smartphones mais caros da Apple nas impressões iniciais.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Apple iPhone XR
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-10-30 (Update: 2018-10-31)