Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Apple iPhone XR
Apple iPhone XR (iPhone Serie)
Processador
Apple A12 Bionic 6 x - 2.5 GHz
Placa gráfica
Apple A12 Bionic GPU
Memória
3 GB
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
6.10 polegadas 19.5:9, 1792 x 828 pixel 324 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, multitouch de dez pontos, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB
, 116.93 GB livre
peso
194 g, Suprimento de energia: 46 g
Preço
909 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Apple iPhone XR; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø516 (477-528)
Apple iPhone XR; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø644 (578-672)
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Basemark GPU 1.1 | AnTuTu v7 | AnTuTu v6 | VRMark | BaseMark OS II | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
| Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
| 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
| Average Apple A12 Bionic (302955 - 370545, n=4) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
| VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone XR | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
| Average Apple A12 Bionic (2407 - 2873, n=6) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years) | |
O Apple iPhone XR tem muito a ver com isso. Além disso, a tela de resolução mais baixa é um pouco mais segura, já que é efetivamente mais nítida que as telas OLED no XS e no XS Max. Além disso, a tela do XR não possui PWM, que afeta seus irmãos mais caros.
Além disso, é pouco provável que a economia de custos da Apple faça diferença no uso diário, seja na classificação IP mais fraca, no desempenho mais lento de LTE e Wi-Fi ou na menor quantidade de RAM. Esperamos que o único comprometimento perceptível seja a falta do zoom óptico.
Em última análise, o XR deve provar sua bateria antes de podermos recomendar o dispositivo. No entanto, o XR parece uma ótima alternativa para os smartphones mais caros da Apple nas impressões iniciais.
Pricecompare
