Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto Z2 Play

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/26/2017

O jogador fino. Com o Moto Z2 Play, a Lenovo atualiza seu smartphone de gama média que pode ser expandido através de módulos na parte traseira. O antecessor ofereceu uma duração de bateria muito boa e uma carcaça extremamente fina. Verificaremos se o sucessor talvez até tenha melhorado essas qualidades, no teste.

Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Moto Z Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm MSM8953-Pro Snapdragon 626
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 401 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 18.9 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 2TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, Rádio FM, USB OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B19/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 6 x 156.2 x 76.2
Bateria
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​1.7, laser-AF, phase comparison-AF (dual-pixel), dual-LED flash, Videos @2160p/​30FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2, dual-LED flash, videos @1080p/​30FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante frontal, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, Manual do usuário, Moto Mods, 12 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat. 7 (download 300 MBit/s, ipload 150 MBit/s); SAR rates: 0.671 W/kg (head), 1.680 W/kg (body)
peso
145 g, Suprimento de energia: 82 g
Preço
499 Euro

 

Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s ∼100% +671%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s ∼76% +484%
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼67% +414%
Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
236 MBit/s ∼64% +391%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼33% +152%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48.1 MBit/s ∼13%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s ∼100% +1727%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s ∼62% +1036%
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 MBit/s ∼48% +778%
Honor 8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
233 MBit/s ∼43% +690%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼21% +280%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29.5 MBit/s ∼5%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge
GPS Lenovo Moto Z2 Play – Overview
GPS Lenovo Moto Z2 Play – Overview
GPS Lenovo Moto Z2 Play – Crossing
GPS Lenovo Moto Z2 Play – Crossing
GPS Lenovo Moto Z2 Play – Bridge
GPS Lenovo Moto Z2 Play – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker: Target colors are displayed in the lower half of each patch..
ColorChecker: Target colors are displayed in the lower half of each patch..
Photographed reference card
Photographed reference card
Reference card details
Reference card details
350
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 434 cd/m² Médio: 403.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.59 cd/m²
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 434 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.24
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Honor 8 Pro
IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7
Lenovo Moto Z Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
HTC U Ultra
SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
18%
36%
37%
-22%
43%
Brightness
404
514
27%
511
26%
431
7%
445
10%
552
37%
Brightness Distribution
81
91
12%
93
15%
93
15%
88
9%
96
19%
Black Level *
0.3
0.22
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
3.2
27%
2.2
50%
1.6
64%
5.5
-25%
1.59
64%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.2
4
5%
2
52%
1.7
60%
7.6
-81%
2.01
52%
Gamma
2.24 107%
2.27 106%
2.25 107%
2.25 107%
2.2 109%
2.01 119%
CCT
7343 89%
7120 91%
6768 96%
6329 103%
7454 87%
6321 103%
Contrast
1803
2136
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8499 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.4 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
67578 Points ∼30%
Honor 8 Pro
146044 Points ∼64% +116%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points ∼27% -9%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼78% +162%
HTC U Ultra
139017 Points ∼61% +106%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼56% +91%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
4924 Points ∼48%
Honor 8 Pro
6134 Points ∼60% +25%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼64% +34%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼51% +6%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
6096 Points ∼71%
Honor 8 Pro
7356 Points ∼86% +21%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points ∼79% +11%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼92% +28%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼61% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼55% -24%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
10 Points ∼1%
Honor 8 Pro
1131 Points ∼67% +11210%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points ∼38% +6390%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼76% +12770%
HTC U Ultra
907 Points ∼53% +8970%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼59% +9840%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
1006 Points ∼11%
Honor 8 Pro
4070 Points ∼44% +305%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points ∼11% +1%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼66% +511%
HTC U Ultra
4591 Points ∼50% +356%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼24% +119%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
928 Points ∼21%
Honor 8 Pro
4277 Points ∼97% +361%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points ∼18% -14%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼100% +377%
HTC U Ultra
1581 Points ∼36% +70%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼47% +123%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3154 Points ∼31%
Honor 8 Pro
4029 Points ∼39% +28%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points ∼20% -34%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼57% +87%
HTC U Ultra
2834 Points ∼28% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼40% +29%
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
412 Points ∼11%
Honor 8 Pro
2985 Points ∼79% +625%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points ∼27% +147%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼100% +820%
HTC U Ultra
2078 Points ∼55% +404%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼55% +403%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3092 Points ∼36%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points ∼93% +159%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
4471 Points ∼18%
Honor 8 Pro
6245 Points ∼25% +40%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼27% +52%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
907 Points ∼15%
Honor 8 Pro
1853 Points ∼31% +104%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼33% +118%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
2166 Points ∼70%
Honor 8 Pro
2216 Points ∼72% +2%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1636 Points ∼53% -24%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼98% +40%
HTC U Ultra
1763 Points ∼57% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (min: 1594) Points ∼69% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
383 Points ∼7%
Honor 8 Pro
1746 Points ∼32% +356%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
382 Points ∼7% 0%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% +881%
HTC U Ultra
2405 Points ∼45% +528%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (min: 2043) Points ∼41% +482%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
469 Points ∼12%
Honor 8 Pro
1832 Points ∼47% +291%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
461 Points ∼12% -2%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼92% +660%
HTC U Ultra
2225 Points ∼57% +374%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (min: 1923) Points ∼57% +370%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
2167 Points ∼70%
Honor 8 Pro
1896 Points ∼62% -13%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points ∼53% -25%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼98% +39%
HTC U Ultra
1646 Points ∼53% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼65% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
724 Points ∼9%
Honor 8 Pro
1856 Points ∼24% +156%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points ∼9% 0%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼62% +558%
HTC U Ultra
3807 Points ∼49% +426%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼39% +316%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
850 Points ∼17%
Honor 8 Pro
1865 Points ∼37% +119%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points ∼17% -3%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼85% +396%
HTC U Ultra
2947 Points ∼59% +247%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼54% +219%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
17204 Points ∼24%
Honor 8 Pro
15129 Points ∼21% -12%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points ∼22% -7%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼27% +13%
HTC U Ultra
21263 Points ∼30% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼27% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
13376 Points ∼3%
Honor 8 Pro
32243 Points ∼7% +141%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points ∼3% 0%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼13% +334%
HTC U Ultra
33446 Points ∼7% +150%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼7% +147%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
14072 Points ∼7%
Honor 8 Pro
25766 Points ∼13% +83%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points ∼7% -1%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼20% +186%
HTC U Ultra
29668 Points ∼15% +111%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼15% +104%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
22 fps ∼2%
Honor 8 Pro
43 fps ∼3% +95%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼2% +5%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼8% +423%
HTC U Ultra
74 fps ∼5% +236%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼6% +268%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
23 fps ∼2%
Honor 8 Pro
59 fps ∼6% +157%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼2% 0%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼6% +161%
HTC U Ultra
46 fps ∼4% +100%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼5% +122%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
9.9 fps ∼2%
Honor 8 Pro
29 fps ∼5% +193%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼2% +1%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11% +516%
HTC U Ultra
26 fps ∼5% +163%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼7% +284%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
10 fps ∼2%
Honor 8 Pro
20 fps ∼4% +100%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼2% 0%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼10% +460%
HTC U Ultra
23 fps ∼4% +130%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼5% +170%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
6.5 fps ∼2%
Honor 8 Pro
21 fps ∼5% +223%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps ∼1% -5%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼10% +546%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼3% +85%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼7% +331%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
7 fps ∼2%
Honor 8 Pro
13 fps ∼3% +86%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps ∼2% -4%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼10% +486%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼3% +71%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼4% +114%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3.5 fps ∼1%
Honor 8 Pro
15 fps ∼4% +329%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3.4 fps ∼1% -3%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼7% +614%
HTC U Ultra
15 fps ∼4% +329%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼4% +329%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3.8 fps ∼0%
Honor 8 Pro
11 fps ∼0% +189%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3.7 fps ∼0% -3%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼1% +558%
HTC U Ultra
8.4 fps ∼0% +121%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps ∼0% +108%

Legend

 
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
75.12 Points ∼100% +129%
OnePlus 5
71.6 Points ∼95% +118%
Honor 8 Pro
58.065 Points ∼77% +77%
HTC U Ultra
45.084 Points ∼60% +37%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
32.796 Points ∼44%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
31.8 Points ∼42% -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13191 Points ∼100% +153%
OnePlus 5
11945 Points ∼91% +130%
Honor 8 Pro
10016 Points ∼76% +92%
HTC U Ultra
5511 Points ∼42% +6%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
5204 Points ∼39%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
4979 Points ∼38% -4%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto Z Play
8168.9 ms * ∼100% -7%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
7667 ms * ∼94%
HTC U Ultra
4141 ms * ∼51% +46%
Honor 8 Pro
3156.7 ms * ∼39% +59%
OnePlus 5
2621.7 ms * ∼32% +66%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2564.1 ms * ∼31% +67%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
163 Points ∼100% +92%
OnePlus 5
161 Points ∼99% +89%
Honor 8 Pro
141 Points ∼87% +66%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
85 Points ∼52%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
83 Points ∼51% -2%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo Moto Z2 PlayHonor 8 ProLenovo Moto Z PlayOnePlus 5HTC U UltraSamsung Galaxy S7 Edge
AndroBench 3-5
119%
-11%
115%
27%
24%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.71
32.16
-45%
50.57
-14%
67.6
15%
50.36
-14%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.69
54.19
-32%
74.58
-6%
82.8
4%
76.43
-4%
Random Write 4KB
47.9
151.6
216%
45.58
-5%
19.3
-60%
13.7
-71%
15.79
-67%
Random Read 4KB
38.2
166.4
336%
38.78
2%
141
269%
84.2
120%
86.71
127%
Sequential Write 256KB
137.5
187.1
36%
73.14
-47%
201.5
47%
164.7
20%
145.11
6%
Sequential Read 256KB
245.6
737.8
200%
254.78
4%
748
205%
423.9
73%
487.34
98%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 33.2 °C33.4 °C31.8 °C 
 33 °C32.5 °C30.8 °C 
 33.2 °C31.6 °C30.6 °C 
Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 32.2 °C
31.4 °C32.8 °C33.1 °C
30.9 °C31.3 °C32.7 °C
30.2 °C31.1 °C31.8 °C
Máximo: 33.1 °C
Médio: 31.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  29.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6272525.426.23125.331.14032.930.55033.627.76331.626.98028.425.31002725.512520.830.41602240.120021.347.725020.849.731521.256.940019.460.950019.564.263017.767.580017.972.3100017.876.3125017.376.9160017.477.1200016.774.1250017.272.7315018.274.9400017.972.6500017.674.3630017.773.5800017.874.51000017.978.81250018.177.81600018.270.4SPL3086.8N1.368.2median 17.9Lenovo Moto Z2 Playmedian 72.6Delta1.39.531.650.225.451.225.350.832.948.433.64931.654.428.452.82757.220.8662272.221.371.520.874.221.27519.477.319.578.517.779.617.979.217.881.817.383.417.485.516.784.417.283.518.279.617.978.817.685.817.785.817.881.817.98018.178.218.273.33094.61.3118.1median 17.9JBL Soundboost 2median 79.21.33.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

JBL Soundboost 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.45 / 0.78 / 0.84 Watt
Carga midlight 1.69 / 3.79 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3000 mAh
Honor 8 Pro
4000 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Power Consumption
-189%
-8%
-132%
-192%
-99%
Idle Minimum *
0.45
0.98
-118%
0.51
-13%
0.73
-62%
1
-122%
0.63
-40%
Idle Average *
0.78
2.27
-191%
0.87
-12%
1.44
-85%
2.41
-209%
1.1
-41%
Idle Maximum *
0.84
2.36
-181%
0.9
-7%
1.5
-79%
2.46
-193%
1.56
-86%
Load Average *
1.69
6.58
-289%
1.69
-0%
6.91
-309%
6.8
-302%
5.95
-252%
Load Maximum *
3.79
10.12
-167%
4
-6%
8.51
-125%
8.9
-135%
6.7
-77%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
26h 29min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
12h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 46min
Carga (máximo brilho)
7h 57min
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3000 mAh
Honor 8 Pro
4000 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-32%
33%
-29%
-30%
-5%
Reader / Idle
1589
1378
-13%
2540
60%
1534
-3%
1568
-1%
1663
5%
H.264
946
675
-29%
1190
26%
623
-34%
605
-36%
914
-3%
WiFi v1.3
749
573
-23%
824
10%
518
-31%
546
-27%
732
-2%
Load
477
181
-62%
652
37%
247
-48%
214
-55%
392
-18%

Pro

+ Carcaça de metal muito fina e elegante
+ Muito rígido e ergonômico
+ Diversas opções via Mods
+ Mods fáceis de usar
+ Boa configuração
+ Android puro
+ GPS relativamente preciso
+ Bom alto falante
+ Microfone claro
+ Fotos nítidas da câmera
+ Ângulos de visão estáveis
+ Baixas temperaturas
+ Consumo de energia muito baixo
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Apenas 12 meses de garantia
- Wi-Fi lento
- PWM a baixas frequências
- Iluminação heterogênea da tela
- Tempo de carga relativamente longo
In review: Lenovo Moto Z2 Play. Review sample courtesy of Lenovo Germany.
In review: Lenovo Moto Z2 Play. Review sample courtesy of Lenovo Germany.

O Lenovo Moto Z2 Play é um bom smartphone. Seria ainda melhor se o Moto Z Play não existisse mais. O antecessor faz muitas coisas igual de bem, algumas coisas um pouco pior, e outras coisas ainda melhor, sendo consideravelmente mais barato.

Há algum motivo para comprar o sucessor? A carcaça do Moto Z2 Play foi retrabalhada e agora é ainda mais fina. Este seria um esquema de marketing para um smartphone normal. No entanto, recebe outra dimensão no Moto Z2 Play: Os Moto Mods acopláveis podem fazer que um milímetro seja bastante significativo. O peso mais baixo também é um argumento, dado que os Mods adicionam peso suficiente. Além disso, o comprador recebe uma carcaça muito rígida e elegante com um leitor de digitais menos visível do que no antecessor. O veloz LTE está instalado, mas ainda não o Wi-Fi 802.11ac e a falta de taxas de transmissão Wi-Fi adequadas é realmente audacioso. Em troca, o módulo GPS é muito preciso e as câmeras produzem boas fotos. A tela é mais escura e o desempenho é apenas marginalmente superior ao do antecessor. A duração da bateria ainda é de primeira linha, mas também muito mais curta que a do Lenovo Z Play.

Teríamos recebido agradavelmente mais riscos para a atualização. O Moto Z2 Play da Lenovo é apenas uma versão retrabalhada do Moto Z Play com uma silhueta mais fina, bem como uma bateria menor que dificilmente oferece inovações reais.

Podemos dar ao Moto Z2 Play uma recomendação de compra se o comprador achar o sistema Moto Mods convincente, que funciona bem e com facilidade. O problema aqui é que existem muitas alternativas, como um banco de energia ou alto-falante Bluetooth. Em comparação com isso, os Moto Mods dificilmente oferecem vantagens reais. No entanto, os compradores também devem considerar o Moto Z Playe inclusive o Moto Z: Ambos são atualmente muito mais baratos e a Lenovo também garante a compatibilidade com os Moto Mods nos próximos anos.Lenovo's Moto Z2 Play is a good smartphone. It would look even better if the Moto Z Play (no longer) existed. The predecessor does many things just as good, some things just a bit worse, and other things even better while being considerably cheaper.

Are there any reasons at all for buying the successor? The casing of the Moto Z2 Play has been reworked and is now even slimmer. This would be a marketing scheme for a normal smartphone. However, it receives another dimension in the Moto Z2 Play: The attachable Moto Mods can make one millimeter quite significant. The lower weight is also an argument since the Mods add enough weight. Apart from that, the buyer gets a very rigid and stylish casing with a less conspicuous fingerprint scanner than in the predecessor. Fast LTE is installed, but still not 802.11ac Wi-Fi and the lack of appropriate Wi-Fi transmission rates is actually audacious. In return, the GPS module is very accurate and the cameras produce good photos. The screen is darker and the performance is only marginally higher than that of the predecessor. The battery life is still first-rate but also much shorter than that of Lenovo's Z Play.

We would have welcomed more risk taking for the update. Lenovo's Moto Z2 Play is just a reworked version of the Moto Z Play with a slimmer silhouette, as well as smaller battery that hardly offers any real innovations.

We can give the Moto Z2 Play a purchase recommendation if the buyer finds the Moto Mods system convincing, which function very easily and well. The problem here is that often-good alternatives, such as a power bank or Bluetooth speaker, exist. Compared to that, the Moto Mods hardly offer any real advantages. However, buyers should also consider the Moto Z Play and even the Moto Z: Both are presently much cheaper and Lenovo also guaranties the compatibility with the Moto Mods for the next few years.

Lenovo Moto Z2 Play - 08/15/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
89%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 70%
Peso
93%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
28 / 63 → 44%
Desempenho da aplicação
48 / 70 → 68%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
77 / 91 → 85%
Camera
76%
Médio
75%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Florian Wimmer, 2017-08-26 (Update: 2017-09- 5)