Notebookcheck

Breve Analise do Smartphone Motorola Edge Plus – Até que enfim Gama Alta

O desafiador. Não mais barato! O Edge Plus é a tentativa da Motorola de competir com o que há de melhor no mercado de smartphones. Um preço assertivo e uma conectividade decente podem parecer bons no papel, mas não são nada fora do comum. Mas é o suficiente para bater de frente com a Samsung e a Apple?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto),
Motorola Edge Plus (Edge Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Placa gráfica
Memória
12288 MB 
Pantalha
6.7 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 385 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 90 Hz
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 237 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidad, bússola, barômetro, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G,3G,4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B39/​B30/​B34/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B46/​B48/​B66/​B71), 5G (n2/​n5/​n41/​n66/​n71/​n77/​n78/​n260/​n26), LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.6 x 161.1 x 71.4
Bateria
5000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix f/​1.8, phase detection AF, laser AF, OIS, dual LED flash, videos @3240p/​30fps (camera 1); 16.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 8.0MP, f/​2.4, OIS, telephoto lens (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 25 MPix f/​2.0, videos @1080p/​30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB-C, headset, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, IP52-certified; LTE Cat 22/​18 (2450Mbps/​210Mbps), fanless
peso
203 g, Suprimento de energia: 67 g
Preço
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Vergleichsgeräte

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
09/2020
Motorola Edge Plus
SD 865, Adreno 650
203 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"2340x1080
88 %
04/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
188 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"3200x1440
87 %
09/2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.5"2688x1242
89 %
04/2020
Huawei P40 Pro
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
209 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.58"2640x1200
88 %
04/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
88 %
04/2020
OnePlus 8 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
199 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.78"3168x1440
Motorola Edge Plus
Motorola Edge Plus
Motorola Edge Plus
Motorola Edge Plus
Motorola Edge Plus
Motorola Edge Plus
Motorola Edge Plus
Motorola Edge Plus

Size Comparison

165.3 mm 74.3 mm 8.5 mm 199 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g161.1 mm 71.4 mm 9.6 mm 203 g161.9 mm 73.7 mm 7.8 mm 188 g158.2 mm 72.6 mm 8.95 mm 209 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
883 (834min - 919max) MBit/s ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
835 (808min - 847max) MBit/s ∼95% +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
831 (745min - 872max) MBit/s ∼94% +7%
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
821 (388min - 998max) MBit/s ∼93% +5%
Motorola Edge Plus
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
780 (716min - 826max) MBit/s ∼88%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (550min - 597max) MBit/s ∼66% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=584)
274 MBit/s ∼31% -65%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1544 (797min - 1619max) MBit/s ∼100% +71%
Motorola Edge Plus
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
905 (824min - 920max) MBit/s ∼59%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
876 (767min - 904max) MBit/s ∼57% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
863 (759min - 898max) MBit/s ∼56% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
816 (403min - 832max) MBit/s ∼53% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (461min - 625max) MBit/s ∼38% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=584)
261 MBit/s ∼17% -71%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø779 (716-826)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø905 (824-920)
Tracking Motorola Edge Plus - overview
Tracking Motorola Edge Plus - overview
Tracking Motorola Edge Plus - turning point
Tracking Motorola Edge Plus - turning point
Tracking Motorola Edge Plus - bridge
Tracking Motorola Edge Plus - bridge
Tracking Garmin Edge 520 - overpass
Tracking Garmin Edge 520 - overpass
Tracking Garmin Edge 520 - turning point
Tracking Garmin Edge 520 - turning point
Tracking Garmin Edge 520 - bridge
Tracking Garmin Edge 520 - bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptobjektiv BlumeHauptobjektiv UmgebungHauptobjektiv Low LightUltraweitwinkel
ColorChecker
23.2 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
25 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
42 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge Plus: 30.01 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 43.82 ∆E
ColorChecker
14 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge Plus: 9.04 ∆E min: 2.02 - max: 15.34 ∆E
609
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
549
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
589
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 609 cd/m² Médio: 581.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.56 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 549 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.16 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.301
Motorola Edge Plus
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7
Samsung Galaxy S20+
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Huawei P40 Pro
OLED, 2640x1200, 6.58
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
OnePlus 8 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.78
Screen
30%
41%
33%
48%
52%
Brightness middle
549
740
35%
790
44%
584
6%
753
37%
796
45%
Brightness
582
747
28%
790
36%
576
-1%
762
31%
779
34%
Brightness Distribution
90
94
4%
97
8%
95
6%
96
7%
94
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.16
2.6
18%
1.4
56%
1.1
65%
0.9
72%
0.68
78%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.58
4.57
31%
3.4
48%
2.3
65%
1.6
76%
1.55
76%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.2
1.5
64%
1.9
55%
1.8
57%
1.5
64%
1.1
74%
Gamma
2.301 96%
2.269 97%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.24 98%
2.237 98%
CCT
7280 89%
6284 103%
6466 101%
6355 102%
6415 101%
6310 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 328.9 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 328.9 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 328.9 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17714 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
OpenCL Score 5.2 (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3242 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3129 - 3310, n=5)
3220 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 5532, n=22)
2081 Points ∼64% -36%
Vulkan Score 5.2 (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3012 Points ∼94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2893 - 3665, n=5)
3202 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (77 - 4789, n=23)
1884 Points ∼59% -37%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3379 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2899 Points ∼86% -14%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3165 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3338 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3318 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3076 - 3449, n=13)
3317 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=106)
1963 Points ∼58% -42%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
914 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
944 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
779 Points ∼83% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
906 Points ∼96% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
909 Points ∼96% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (898 - 924, n=13)
912 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=106)
557 Points ∼59% -39%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11774 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10583 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11341 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10952 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11153 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9762 - 15299, n=14)
11519 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=509)
5915 Points ∼50% -50%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
16085 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
14760 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
14352 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13142 Points ∼82% -18%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13471 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11839 - 19989, n=13)
14121 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=667)
6485 Points ∼40% -60%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4061 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3230 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4057 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3830 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3888 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3193 - 4061, n=11)
3770 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=163)
2656 Points ∼65% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8333 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8783 Points ∼100% +5%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6360 Points ∼72% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8173 Points ∼93% -2%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8279 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8064 - 8333, n=11)
8221 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=163)
2978 Points ∼34% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6754 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6355 Points ∼94% -6%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5648 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6578 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6618 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6106 - 6754, n=12)
6515 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6754, n=163)
2673 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5621 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4495 Points ∼78% -20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5728 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5277 Points ∼92% -6%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5506 Points ∼96% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5187 - 5780, n=12)
5446 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=512)
2200 Points ∼38% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9555 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9190 Points ∼96% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6771 Points ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9356 Points ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9379 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9157 - 9567, n=12)
9415 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=512)
2112 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8269 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7459 Points ∼90% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6508 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7986 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8111 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7957 - 8269, n=13)
8099 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=513)
1971 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5661 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4455 Points ∼78% -21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5718 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4283 Points ∼75% -24%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5480 Points ∼96% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3956 - 5765, n=12)
5136 Points ∼90% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=543)
2112 Points ∼37% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12993 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9471 Points ∼73% -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7905 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12694 Points ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12665 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (12547 - 12993, n=12)
12727 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=543)
2830 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10089 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7576 Points ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7286 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8823 Points ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9807 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8499 - 10090, n=12)
9563 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=543)
2376 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5183 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4180 Points ∼81% -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4971 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4895 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4987 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 5209, n=12)
4985 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=593)
2083 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8430 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8469 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6465 Points ∼76% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8299 Points ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8106 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7854 - 8432, n=12)
8258 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=593)
1779 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7400 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6896 Points ∼93% -7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6060 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7157 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7117 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6943 - 7400, n=13)
7199 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=594)
1695 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5162 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4124 Points ∼80% -20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4975 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4729 Points ∼92% -8%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4928 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3965 - 5274, n=12)
4857 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=635)
1948 Points ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12611 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6392 Points ∼51% -49%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7499 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12394 Points ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11371 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11175 - 12611, n=12)
11841 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=634)
2340 Points ∼19% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9549 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5696 Points ∼60% -40%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6739 Points ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9123 Points ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8811 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8215 - 9549, n=12)
8965 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=637)
2011 Points ∼21% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
35269 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
27431 Points ∼59% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼73% -4%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46731 Points ∼100% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
32384 Points ∼69% -8%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
32240 Points ∼69% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (26182 - 58293, n=12)
34668 Points ∼74% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=781)
15413 Points ∼33% -56%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
154251 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
48476 Points ∼24% -69%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +34%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
82652 Points ∼40% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
150281 Points ∼73% -3%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
149017 Points ∼72% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (143643 - 154375, n=12)
148395 Points ∼72% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=779)
26525 Points ∼13% -83%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88160 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
41415 Points ∼43% -53%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +10%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
70593 Points ∼73% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
82937 Points ∼86% -6%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
82562 Points ∼85% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (72524 - 112989, n=12)
84080 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=779)
20738 Points ∼21% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
168 fps ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
199 fps ∼69% +18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +71%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
203 fps ∼71% +21%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
206 fps ∼72% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (168 - 207, n=13)
201 fps ∼70% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=784)
44.9 fps ∼16% -73%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
90 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼66% -34%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (60 - 138, n=13)
77.5 fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=793)
31 fps ∼34% -66%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
96 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
126 fps ∼80% +31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +64%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
118 fps ∼75% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
122 fps ∼78% +27%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
126 fps ∼80% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (96 - 126, n=13)
121 fps ∼77% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=689)
26.5 fps ∼17% -72%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
84 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼68% -29%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼68% -29%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
59 fps ∼67% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼100% +5%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (58 - 109, n=13)
72.5 fps ∼82% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=697)
22.3 fps ∼25% -73%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
67 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85 fps ∼85% +27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +49%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75 fps ∼75% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼86% +28%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼88% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (67 - 88, n=14)
84.1 fps ∼84% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=552)
21.3 fps ∼21% -68%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
61 fps ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
59 fps ∼77% -3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼78% -2%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
52 fps ∼68% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
77 fps ∼100% +26%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼78% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 77, n=14)
59.6 fps ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=554)
19.4 fps ∼25% -68%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
32 fps ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
33 fps ∼72% +3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +44%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
23 fps ∼50% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼65% -6%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼67% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 32, n=14)
27.9 fps ∼61% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=305)
11.3 fps ∼25% -65%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
22 fps ∼76% +10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +45%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼69% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼69% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 20, n=14)
20 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=303)
8.09 fps ∼28% -60%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
43 fps ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
52 fps ∼90% +21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +35%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps ∼62% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼81% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼83% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 53, n=14)
43.6 fps ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=309)
16.9 fps ∼29% -61%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
49 fps ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
58 fps ∼77% +18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +53%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
50 fps ∼67% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
54 (20min) fps ∼72% +10%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼72% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 54, n=14)
51.1 fps ∼68% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=308)
19.4 fps ∼26% -60%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
39 fps ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
51 fps ∼81% +31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +62%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
44 fps ∼70% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼79% +28%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼81% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (39 - 52, n=14)
49.9 fps ∼79% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=477)
14.3 fps ∼23% -63%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
38 fps ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
45 fps ∼94% +18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +26%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31 fps ∼65% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps ∼94% +18%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼94% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 46, n=14)
39.1 fps ∼81% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=481)
12.7 fps ∼26% -67%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
556199 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
296746 Points ∼50% -47%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
496966 Points ∼83% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
595466 Points ∼100% +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
585231 Points ∼98% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (538107 - 607937, n=14)
577410 Points ∼97% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=106)
319602 Points ∼54% -43%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1598 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1378 Points ∼79% -14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +9%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1629 Points ∼93% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1514 Points ∼87% -5%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1496 Points ∼86% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 1650, n=13)
1472 Points ∼84% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=723)
817 Points ∼47% -49%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12073 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10803 Points ∼64% -11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +41%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10138 Points ∼60% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11567 Points ∼68% -4%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11842 Points ∼70% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11399 - 12073, n=13)
11666 Points ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=723)
2489 Points ∼15% -79%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7597 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3775 Points ∼48% -50%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼30% -69%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6038 Points ∼76% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7945 Points ∼100% +5%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7240 Points ∼91% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5564 - 8874, n=13)
7251 Points ∼91% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=723)
1847 Points ∼23% -76%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9744 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9281 Points ∼65% -5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +46%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9782 Points ∼69% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10002 Points ∼70% +3%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10058 Points ∼71% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8421 - 10147, n=13)
9708 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=723)
3438 Points ∼24% -65%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Edge Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6147 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4779 Points ∼78% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5589 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6072 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5993 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6273, n=13)
5879 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=723)
1752 Points ∼29% -71%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +81%
Motorola Edge Plus (Chrome 84)
71.364 Points ∼55%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
69.956 Points ∼54% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
64.958 Points ∼50% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50.9 - 77, n=13)
63.7 Points ∼49% -11%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
63.374 Points ∼49% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
50.566 Points ∼39% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=183)
40.6 Points ∼31% -43%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +161%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
116.61 Points ∼39% +1%
Motorola Edge Plus (Chrome 84)
115.57 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
115.43 Points ∼38% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.78 Points ∼38% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (79.1 - 126, n=12)
112 Points ∼37% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
89.329 Points ∼30% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=614)
47 Points ∼16% -59%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +116%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
71.8 runs/min ∼47% +2%
Motorola Edge Plus (Chome 84)
70.7 runs/min ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
68.6 runs/min ∼45% -3%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80)
67.7 runs/min ∼44% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=13)
63.5 runs/min ∼42% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chome 80)
62.8 runs/min ∼41% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=166)
43 runs/min ∼28% -39%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +51%
Motorola Edge Plus (Chrome 84)
120 Points ∼66%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
104 Points ∼57% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 120, n=13)
104 Points ∼57% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
101 Points ∼56% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
86 Points ∼48% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=250)
69.9 Points ∼39% -42%
Huawei P40 Pro
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +102%
Motorola Edge Plus (Chrome 84)
24467 Points ∼50%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
23690 Points ∼48% -3%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
23678 Points ∼48% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
22834 Points ∼46% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (15745 - 24467, n=13)
21981 Points ∼45% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
18094 Points ∼37% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=781)
7826 Points ∼16% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=807)
9792 ms * ∼100% -391%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
2488.3 ms * ∼25% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
2021.2 ms * ∼21% -1%
Motorola Edge Plus (Chrome 84)
1993 ms * ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1992 - 2538, n=14)
1968 ms * ∼20% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
1944.7 ms * ∼20% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
1913.7 ms * ∼20% +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼6% +71%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Edge PlusSamsung Galaxy S20+Huawei P40 ProXiaomi Mi 10 ProOnePlus 8 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-8%
-8%
7%
-8%
-17%
-81%
Random Write 4KB
235.7
229.8
-3%
271.83
15%
258.54
10%
197.7
-16%
183 (24.8 - 272, n=19)
-22%
35.3 (0.14 - 319, n=878)
-85%
Random Read 4KB
230.9
199.6
-14%
228.06
-1%
264.9
15%
208.3
-10%
206 (169 - 265, n=19)
-11%
58.7 (1.59 - 324, n=878)
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
745.9
694.3
-7%
395.74
-47%
750.44
1%
730.4
-2%
536 (387 - 756, n=19)
-28%
126 (2.99 - 911, n=878)
-83%
Sequential Read 256KB
1721.4
1603.1
-7%
1774.68
3%
1738.65
1%
1627.3
-5%
1595 (1398 - 1789, n=19)
-7%
338 (12.1 - 1802, n=878)
-80%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.0.0: Ø59.8 (56-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.0.0: Ø39.9 (30-41)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.4.6a: Ø58.3 (45-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.4.6a: Ø59.3 (50-61)
Carga Máxima
 44.3 °C42.8 °C40.3 °C 
 44.8 °C42.6 °C40.3 °C 
 44.9 °C42.3 °C40.4 °C 
Máximo: 44.9 °C
Médio: 42.5 °C
39.9 °C41.7 °C43.5 °C
39.9 °C41.5 °C42.4 °C
38.3 °C40.5 °C41.2 °C
Máximo: 43.5 °C
Médio: 41 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.540.22536.234.43127.331.14033.533.95033.433.66323.523.88022.620.11002224.212520.827.116017.944.220013.347.625012.248.531512.250.640012.455.150013.461.563013.468.480017.668.2100016.667.4125014.371160012.568.820001368.7250013.867.8315014.866.9400016.669.8500017.369.7630018.267.680001963.81000019.666.11250019.671.91600020.368.2SPL57.366.228.380.4N11.119.5147.7median 16.6median 67.4Delta2.78.741.348.937.543.22931.231.631.233.235.428.329.923.322.523.323.324.230.420.541.51948.217.652.216.954.416.256.816.463.318.36616.16614.770.914.274.314.776.113.976.214.376.414.975.314.875.315.371.414.967.31570.415.572.316.469.31672.475.372.427.585.63326.1160.9median 16median 69.329.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Edge PlusSamsung Galaxy S20+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Edge Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S20+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.8 / 2.3 Watt
Carga midlight 5.8 / 10.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Edge Plus
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
3%
3%
33%
36%
-41%
-3%
22%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
1
17%
0.92
23%
0.92
23%
0.61
49%
2.2
-83%
1.255 (0.53 - 2.2, n=13)
-5%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=883)
26%
Idle Average *
1.8
1.7
6%
2.9
-61%
1.41
22%
1.19
34%
3.3
-83%
2.16 (1.19 - 3.43, n=13)
-20%
1.755 (0.6 - 6.2, n=882)
2%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
2.3
-0%
2.94
-28%
1.47
36%
1.23
47%
3.7
-61%
2.47 (1.23 - 4, n=13)
-7%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=883)
11%
Load Average *
5.8
5.8
-0%
3.65
37%
3.35
42%
4.18
28%
5.9
-2%
5.37 (3.5 - 7.4, n=13)
7%
4.1 (0.8 - 10.8, n=877)
29%
Load Maximum *
10.9
11.8
-8%
6.18
43%
6.37
42%
8.53
22%
8.3
24%
9.94 (7.68 - 12.3, n=13)
9%
6.07 (1.2 - 14.2, n=877)
44%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
36h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 43min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 49min
Motorola Edge Plus
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh
Battery Runtime
-18%
16%
-24%
-16%
-6%
Reader / Idle
2216
2041
-8%
2618
18%
1474
-33%
2133
-4%
2103
-5%
H.264
1243
978
-21%
1346
8%
1137
-9%
973
-22%
1023
-18%
WiFi v1.3
945
794
-16%
909
-4%
743
-21%
865
-8%
923
-2%
Load
289
218
-25%
408
41%
198
-31%
198
-31%
296
2%

Pro

+ Ampla gama de frequências LTE suportadas
+ Alto desempenho do sistema
+ Serviços de localização precisa
+ Conector de áudio de 3,5-mm
+ Gravação de vídeo em 6K
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Sem bloatware
+ Wi-Fi rápido

Contra

- Potência medíocre do sinal de celular
- Falta de detalhes nas fotos
- Qualidade de chamada medíocre
- Carregamento relativamente lento
- Afogamento sob uso intenso
- Sem resistência à água
- Módulo GPS lento

Veredicto – Quão bem se saiu?

In review: Motorola Edge Plus. Review unit provided by Motorola Germany
In review: Motorola Edge Plus. Review unit provided by Motorola Germany

Se você cobra mais de US$ 1.000 por um smartphone, você precisa atender as expectativas. Infelizmente, o Motorola Edge+ não consegue fazer exatamente isso em muitas áreas. A câmera oferece alta resolução, mas falta foco nos detalhes e a lente principal teve desempenho medíocre com pouca luz, na melhor das hipóteses. A carcaça é elegante e moderna, mas pode ser pressionada e não é à prova d'água.

O carregamento é outra área em que seus concorrentes oferecem mais retorno pelo investimento, a qualidade da chamada deveria ser melhor e os alto-falantes não estão entre os melhores que os smartphones de ponta tinham a oferecer no momento em que este artigo foi escrito. A tela não é tão brilhante e com cores precisas como em outros smartphones na faixa de preço do Edge+, e o dispositivo tende a ter aceleração térmica sob carga sustentada.

Concedido, sua tela sem bordas e traseira elegante fazem o Motorola Edge+ se destacar até certo ponto, os serviços de localização funcionam muito bem uma vez que o bloqueio de localização foi obtido e a Motorola retirou todas as barreiras relacionadas à comunicação sem fio, desde o 5G até o Wi-Fi 6 até Bluetooth 5.1.

O Edge+ significa o retorno da Motorola ao reino dos smartphones de gama alta. Infelizmente, o dispositivo não consegue justificar seu alto preço pedido.

Se você está procurando um smartphone com entrada para fone de ouvido de 3,5 mm, ficará feliz em saber que a Motorola continua a oferecer suporte à saída de áudio analógica. Outro benefício é sua versão pura e limpa do Android, incluindo patches de segurança um tanto atualizados.

O Motorola Edge+ pode não ser o smartphone de gama alta com a melhor relação preço-desempenho, especialmente considerando alternativas mais acessíveis, como o OnePlus 8 Pro ou o Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro. No entanto, consegue oferecer um nível de desempenho muito alto, um design exclusivo e uma bateria com duração muito boa.

Motorola Edge Plus - 09/09/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
48 / 70 → 68%
Peso
88%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
59 / 64 → 93%
Desempenho da aplicação
84 / 86 → 98%
Temperatura
84%
Ruído
100%
Audio
70 / 90 → 78%
Camera
71%
Médio
79%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Analise do Smartphone Motorola Edge Plus – Até que enfim Gama Alta
Florian Schmitt, 2020-09-13 (Update: 2020-09-13)