Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A30s: Um respiro de ar fresco com um design divertido
Device comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.2 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Samsung Galaxy A30s Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2 | 166 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 1560x720 | |
79.1 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Samsung Galaxy A40 Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2 | 140 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 5.90" | 2340x1080 | |
75.7 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Honor 9X Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 197 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.59" | 2340x1080 | |
78.6 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Nokia 7.2 SD 660, Adreno 512 | 180 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2340x1080 | |
77.3 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | HTC Desire 19+ Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320 | 170 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.20" | 1520x720 | |
78.3 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Huawei P30 Lite Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 159 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.15" | 2312x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Honor 9X | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
HTC Desire 19+ | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
HTC Desire 19+ | |
Honor 9X | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s |
|
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 488 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Samsung Galaxy A30s Super AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.4" | Samsung Galaxy A40 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.9" | Honor 9X LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.6" | Nokia 7.2 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | HTC Desire 19+ IPS, 1520x720, 6.2" | Huawei P30 Lite IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -127% | -119% | -98% | -72% | -11% | |
Brightness middle | 488 | 358 -27% | 494 1% | 604 24% | 491 1% | 451 -8% |
Brightness | 489 | 370 -24% | 483 -1% | 593 21% | 470 -4% | 430 -12% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 94 1% | 94 1% | 92 -1% | 84 -10% | 90 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.51 | 0.4 | 0.33 | 0.55 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 7.4 -335% | 5.74 -238% | 5.1 -200% | 4.34 -155% | 1.4 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.3 | 12.5 -279% | 10.26 -211% | 10.3 -212% | 8.17 -148% | 4.4 -33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 4 -100% | 7.3 -265% | 6.4 -220% | 4.3 -115% | 2.5 -25% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.084 106% | 2.086 105% | 2.23 99% | 2.302 96% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6506 100% | 7078 92% | 8572 76% | 8149 80% | 7214 90% | 6422 101% |
Contrast | 969 | 1510 | 1488 | 820 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
HTC Desire 19+ | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (5802 - 6923, n=4) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
HTC Desire 19+ | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (5269 - 5474, n=4) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (6.2 - 24, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=175, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (7 - 13, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=175, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (3.8 - 17, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=175, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (4.3 - 8.1, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=175, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 () |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (101367 - 109906, n=4) |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (71303 - 75333, n=2) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (22.1 - 25.7, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (42.2 - 45.1, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (19.3 - 24.1, n=4) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (43 - 56, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (7798 - 9087, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (3703 - 5707, n=4) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A30s | Samsung Galaxy A40 | Honor 9X | Nokia 7.2 | HTC Desire 19+ | Huawei P30 Lite | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -4% | 231% | 7% | 22% | 94% | 25% | 1052% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 291.8 | 295 1% | 860 195% | 290.8 0% | 288 -1% | 293.2 0% | 274 ? -6% | 1883 ? 545% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 101.7 | 99.6 -2% | 196.1 93% | 161.4 59% | 210.8 107% | 158.6 56% | 176.6 ? 74% | 1469 ? 1344% |
Random Read 4KB | 93.2 | 75.7 -19% | 142.3 53% | 79.6 -15% | 76.5 -18% | 71.6 -23% | 59.4 ? -36% | 278 ? 198% |
Random Write 4KB | 13.95 | 13.2 -5% | 159.3 1042% | 13.38 -4% | 20.4 46% | 87.3 526% | 32.2 ? 131% | 310 ? 2122% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 80 ? | 81.2 ? 2% | 76.2 ? -5% | 83.3 ? 4% | 81.8 ? 2% | 76.8 ? -4% | 77.4 ? -3% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64 ? | 65.2 ? 2% | 67.1 ? 5% | 64 ? 0% | 61.8 ? -3% | 67.8 ? 6% | 58.3 ? -9% |
Arena of Valor
Asphalt 9: Legends
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A30s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P30 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.02 / 0.57 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.79 / 1.98 / 2.03 Watt |
Carga |
2.37 / 3.68 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy A30s 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A40 3100 mAh | Honor 9X 4000 mAh | Nokia 7.2 3500 mAh | HTC Desire 19+ 3850 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 7904 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -66% | -126% | -52% | -39% | -51% | -60% | -62% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.79 | 0.8 -1% | 2.3 -191% | 0.77 3% | 1.3 -65% | 0.91 -15% | 1.048 ? -33% | 0.882 ? -12% |
Idle Average * | 1.98 | 1.4 29% | 3 -52% | 2.32 -17% | 2 -1% | 2.41 -22% | 2.51 ? -27% | 1.448 ? 27% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.03 | 2.3 -13% | 4.2 -107% | 2.41 -19% | 2.9 -43% | 2.43 -20% | 2.8 ? -38% | 1.606 ? 21% |
Load Average * | 2.37 | 7.4 -212% | 5.3 -124% | 4.44 -87% | 3.6 -52% | 4.57 -93% | 5.28 ? -123% | 6.57 ? -177% |
Load Maximum * | 3.68 | 8.6 -134% | 9.4 -155% | 8.79 -139% | 5 -36% | 7.57 -106% | 6.61 ? -80% | 9.93 ? -170% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A30s 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A40 3100 mAh | Honor 9X 4000 mAh | Nokia 7.2 3500 mAh | HTC Desire 19+ 3850 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -9% | 31% | -10% | 25% | -29% | |
H.264 | 982 | 825 -16% | 685 -30% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 634 | 643 1% | 832 31% | 570 -10% | 795 25% | 515 -19% |
Load | 317 | 277 -13% | 198 -38% | |||
Reader / Idle | 1689 | 1248 |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Um smartphone elegante com algumas desvantagens
Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S10+ Dispositivos de teste cortesia da notebooksbilliger.de.
O Galaxy A30s é um smartphone decente de nível básico que a Samsung colocou um preço adequado. Seu painel SuperAMOLED tem cores precisas e brilhantes, embora sua resolução de 720p seja bastante baixa para os padrões atuais. O Exynos 7904 é poderoso o suficiente para todas as tarefas diárias e até mesmo para alguns jogos. Títulos complexos como Asphalt 9: Legends levarão o A30s ao limite.
O Samsung Galaxy A30s atende às nossas expectativas, considerando seu preço. Pedimos apenas uma maior duração da bateria.
A Samsung deixou algumas otimizações de duração da bateria em cima da mesa, em nossa opinião. Enquanto o A30s alcançou durações respeitáveis durante nossos testes, muitos de nossos dispositivos de comparação duraram mais com baterias menores. O lento sensor de digitais na tela também é um erro, assim como o desempenho Wi-Fi comparativamente lento. No geral, essas são pequenas desvantagens do que é um smartphone de nível básico.
Samsung Galaxy A30s
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker