Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 8: Telefone de orçamento da Xiaomi define novos padrões

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/28/2020

A Redmi 8 evolution. O uso diário revela diferenças inesperadamente grandes entre o Redmi 8 e seu irmão, o Redmi 8A. Discutiremos abaixo em quais áreas o Redmi 8 barato melhora o Redmi 8A e porque seu preço sugerido de 115 Euros (~ $127) vale a pena.

Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Redmi Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.22 polegadas 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS LCD, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 49 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: cartões microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB Type-C, Miracast, LED de status, rádio FM, emissor IV
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.4 x 156.5 x 75.4
Bateria
5000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual: 12 MP (f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4 µm) + 2 MP, Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/2.0, 1.12 µm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: Virtual, Carregador, cabo USB-C, ferramenta SIM, carcaça, MIUI 11, 12 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body - 1.48 W/kg, Head - 0.231 W/kg. LTE Cat 4/5 (150/75 Mbps), fanless
peso
188 g, Suprimento de energia: 70 g
Preço
140 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Device comparison

RatingDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionBest Price
76%01/2020Xiaomi Redmi 8
439, Adreno 505
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.22"1520x720
75%12/2019Xiaomi Redmi 8A
439, Adreno 505
188 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.22"1520x720
81%04/2019Nokia 4.2
439, Adreno 505
161 g32 GB eMMC Flash5.71"1520x720
76%07/2019Samsung Galaxy A20e
7884B, Mali-G71 MP2
141 g32 GB eMMC Flash5.8"1560x720
75%10/2019LG K50
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
170 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.26"1520x720
81%06/2019Wiko View 3
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
178 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.26"1520x720
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8

Size Comparison

161.3 mm 77 mm 8.7 mm 170 g159 mm 76.5 mm 8.2 mm 178 g156.5 mm 75.4 mm 9.4 mm 188 g156.5 mm 75.4 mm 9.4 mm 188 g148.95 mm 71.3 mm 8.39 mm 161 g147.4 mm 69.7 mm 8.4 mm 141 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=487)
235 MBit/s ∼100% +318%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
70 (min: 57, max: 83) MBit/s ∼30% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 47, max: 67) MBit/s ∼26% +7%
LG K50
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 53, max: 57) MBit/s ∼26% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Adreno 505, 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.2 (min: 47, max: 58) MBit/s ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
56 (min: 54, max: 58) MBit/s ∼24% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼22% -6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=487)
221 MBit/s ∼100% +340%
LG K50
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.9 (min: 51, max: 59) MBit/s ∼25% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.3 (min: 49, max: 60) MBit/s ∼25% +10%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55 (min: 47, max: 62) MBit/s ∼25% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Adreno 505, 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.2 (min: 24, max: 56) MBit/s ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39.7 (min: 23, max: 50) MBit/s ∼18% -21%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼16% -30%
0102030405060Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53.3 (47-58)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø49.4 (24-56)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Overview
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Overview
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Loop
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Loop
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Cycling around a lake
Automatic mode
Automatic mode
Portrait mode
Portrait mode
Automatic mode
Automatic mode with AI-enabled

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker Photo
26.7 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
60.2 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
61.3 ∆E
61.3 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
73.3 ∆E
38 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
81 ∆E
67.9 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 8: 43.38 ∆E min: 12.22 - max: 80.98 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
7.2 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 8: 5.14 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 8.14 ∆E
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
A cropped photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart shot at 1 lux
470
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 554 cd/m² Médio: 516 cd/m² Minimum: 1.34 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 554 cd/m²
Contraste: 2308:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
95.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Xiaomi Redmi 8
IPS LCD, 1520x720, 6.22
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
IPS, 1520x720, 6.22
Nokia 4.2
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Samsung Galaxy A20e
IPS, 1560x720, 5.8
LG K50
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Wiko View 3
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Screen
-47%
-54%
-82%
-45%
-28%
Brightness middle
554
441
-20%
445
-20%
475
-14%
489
-12%
574
4%
Brightness
516
421
-18%
424
-18%
473
-8%
453
-12%
552
7%
Brightness Distribution
85
89
5%
91
7%
93
9%
85
0%
91
7%
Black Level *
0.24
0.38
-58%
0.26
-8%
0.35
-46%
0.42
-75%
0.19
21%
Contrast
2308
1161
-50%
1712
-26%
1357
-41%
1164
-50%
3021
31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.6
4.46
-72%
5.9
-127%
6.8
-162%
4.75
-83%
5.5
-112%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.9
8.01
-63%
9.3
-90%
13.4
-173%
7.75
-58%
9.5
-94%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
5.4
-100%
6.8
-152%
8.7
-222%
4.6
-70%
5
-85%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.146 103%
2.2 100%
2.33 94%
2.164 102%
2.1 105%
CCT
6814 95%
7901 82%
8443 77%
9385 69%
7510 87%
7610 85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13634 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.8 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
68.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 33.2 ms rise
↘ 35.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
Points ∼0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3794, n=43)
1387 Points ∼100%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
252 Points ∼14%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
272 Points ∼15% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (252 - 272, n=3)
265 Points ∼15% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=50)
1786 Points ∼100% +609%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
812 Points ∼44%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
809 Points ∼44% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (809 - 836, n=3)
819 Points ∼44% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=62)
1858 Points ∼100% +129%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
176 Points ∼33%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
177 Points ∼33% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (176 - 177, n=3)
177 Points ∼33% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=62)
530 Points ∼100% +201%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
4664 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4708 Points ∼87% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4623 Points ∼85% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5305 Points ∼98% +14%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4052 Points ∼75% -13%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5135 Points ∼95% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (4412 - 4791, n=6)
4632 Points ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=423)
5425 Points ∼100% +16%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
6076 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6026 Points ∼87% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6228 Points ∼90% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6902 Points ∼100% +14%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4635 Points ∼67% -24%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6912 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (5880 - 6228, n=6)
6095 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=586)
5899 Points ∼85% -3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
2118 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2135 Points ∼81% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2172 Points ∼82% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2018 Points ∼76% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2118 - 2172, n=6)
2139 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=95)
2647 Points ∼100% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
411 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
406 Points ∼16% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
401 Points ∼15% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
498 Points ∼19% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (401 - 412, n=6)
407 Points ∼16% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=95)
2610 Points ∼100% +535%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
501 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
495 Points ∼21% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
490 Points ∼20% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
598 Points ∼25% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (490 - 502, n=6)
496 Points ∼21% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=95)
2400 Points ∼100% +379%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1582 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1627 Points ∼81% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1500 Points ∼74% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1628 Points ∼81% +3%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
936 Points ∼46% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1500 - 1657, n=6)
1597 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=431)
2014 Points ∼100% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
432 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
418 Points ∼23% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
413 Points ∼23% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
440 Points ∼24% +2%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
434 Points ∼24% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (413 - 432, n=6)
420 Points ∼23% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=431)
1813 Points ∼100% +320%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
505 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
501 Points ∼30% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
492 Points ∼29% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
525 Points ∼31% +4%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
493 Points ∼29% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (492 - 505, n=6)
500 Points ∼30% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=432)
1690 Points ∼100% +235%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1602 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1618 Points ∼84% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1516 Points ∼79% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1624 Points ∼84% +1%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
936 Points ∼49% -42%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
975 Points ∼51% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1516 - 1618, n=6)
1588 Points ∼82% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=461)
1925 Points ∼100% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
735 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
725 Points ∼30% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
712 Points ∼29% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
659 Points ∼27% -10%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
701 Points ∼29% -5%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
452 Points ∼19% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (712 - 735, n=6)
727 Points ∼30% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=461)
2420 Points ∼100% +229%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
835 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
826 Points ∼40% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
807 Points ∼39% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
759 Points ∼37% -9%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
742 Points ∼36% -11%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
513 Points ∼25% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (807 - 835, n=6)
826 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=461)
2044 Points ∼100% +145%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1598 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1657 Points ∼86% +4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1575 Points ∼82% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1630 Points ∼85% +2%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
897 Points ∼47% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1575 - 1657, n=6)
1613 Points ∼84% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4909, n=511)
1922 Points ∼100% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
372 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
369 Points ∼24% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼24% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
443 Points ∼29% +19%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
257 Points ∼17% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (364 - 372, n=6)
369 Points ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=511)
1510 Points ∼100% +306%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
448 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
446 Points ∼31% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
441 Points ∼30% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
526 Points ∼36% +17%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
305 Points ∼21% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (439 - 448, n=6)
445 Points ∼31% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=512)
1457 Points ∼100% +225%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1602 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1654 Points ∼92% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1568 Points ∼88% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1646 Points ∼92% +3%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
911 Points ∼51% -43%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
943 Points ∼53% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1561 - 1654, n=6)
1593 Points ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=553)
1789 Points ∼100% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
735 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
719 Points ∼36% -2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
704 Points ∼35% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
637 Points ∼32% -13%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
423 Points ∼21% -42%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
370 Points ∼19% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (704 - 735, n=6)
720 Points ∼36% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=552)
1989 Points ∼100% +171%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
835 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
822 Points ∼48% -2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
802 Points ∼47% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
737 Points ∼43% -12%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
480 Points ∼28% -43%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
428 Points ∼25% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (802 - 835, n=6)
820 Points ∼48% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=555)
1724 Points ∼100% +106%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
23 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
22 fps ∼56% -4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
23 fps ∼59% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼51% -13%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
19 fps ∼49% -17%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
20 fps ∼51% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (22 - 23, n=6)
22.8 fps ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=721)
39 fps ∼100% +70%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
35 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
34 fps ∼97% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
34 fps ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
31 fps ∼89% -11%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
26 fps ∼74% -26%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
27 fps ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (21 - 35, n=6)
32.2 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=730)
28.7 fps ∼82% -18%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
9.8 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
9.7 fps ∼43% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9.8 fps ∼43% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11 fps ∼49% +12%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9.8 fps ∼43% 0%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼44% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.7 - 19, n=6)
11.3 fps ∼50% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=625)
22.6 fps ∼100% +131%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
19 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
18 fps ∼90% -5%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼90% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼100% +5%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼85% -11%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼85% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.3 - 19, n=6)
15.4 fps ∼77% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=634)
19.9 fps ∼100% +5%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
6.6 fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6.4 fps ∼35% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼35% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6.5 fps ∼36% -2%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6 fps ∼33% -9%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.2 fps ∼34% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6.4 - 6.6, n=6)
6.43 fps ∼35% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=490)
18.3 fps ∼100% +177%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
14 fps ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13 fps ∼76% -7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼76% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
14 fps ∼81% 0%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼58% -29%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11 fps ∼64% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6 - 14, n=6)
12.2 fps ∼71% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=492)
17.2 fps ∼100% +23%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
4 fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.9 fps ∼39% -2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.9 fps ∼39% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.8 fps ∼49% +20%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.1 fps ∼41% +3%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.3 fps ∼44% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2 - 4.1, n=6)
3.63 fps ∼37% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=222)
9.88 fps ∼100% +147%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1.2 fps ∼18%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1.2 fps ∼18% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1.2 fps ∼18% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1.4 fps ∼20% +17%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps ∼20% +17%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.6 fps ∼23% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1.2 - 1.2, n=6)
1.2 fps ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=220)
6.85 fps ∼100% +471%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
6.7 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6.7 fps ∼46% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.6 fps ∼45% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
7.8 fps ∼53% +16%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.8 fps ∼46% +1%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.8 fps ∼46% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.5 - 6.7, n=5)
5.98 fps ∼41% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=226)
14.7 fps ∼100% +119%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
3.7 fps ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.6 fps ∼22% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.6 fps ∼22% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4 fps ∼25% +8%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.7 fps ∼23% 0%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼29% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.6 - 3.7, n=6)
3.65 fps ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=226)
16.3 fps ∼100% +341%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
3.6 fps ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.5 fps ∼28% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.5 fps ∼28% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.2 fps ∼34% +17%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.8 fps ∼22% -22%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.9 fps ∼23% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.5 - 3.6, n=6)
3.53 fps ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=415)
12.5 fps ∼100% +247%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
7.1 fps ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
7.1 fps ∼63% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
7 fps ∼63% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
8.6 fps ∼77% +21%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.9 fps ∼35% -45%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼42% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.4 - 7.3, n=6)
6.48 fps ∼58% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=419)
11.2 fps ∼100% +58%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
849 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
821 Points ∼74% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
834 Points ∼75% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1106 Points ∼100% +30%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
703 Points ∼64% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (816 - 1083, n=6)
874 Points ∼79% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=656)
770 Points ∼70% -9%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1009 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
999 Points ∼47% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1000 Points ∼47% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
893 Points ∼42% -11%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
778 Points ∼36% -23%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
799 Points ∼37% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (995 - 1009, n=6)
1003 Points ∼47% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=656)
2134 Points ∼100% +111%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1287 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
758 Points ∼38% -41%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1316 Points ∼66% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2008 Points ∼100% +56%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
661 Points ∼33% -49%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1019 Points ∼51% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (655 - 1335, n=6)
1102 Points ∼55% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=656)
1584 Points ∼79% +23%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
2587 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2271 Points ∼67% -12%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2687 Points ∼80% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3372 Points ∼100% +30%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2165 Points ∼64% -16%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2619 Points ∼78% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2238 - 2687, n=6)
2511 Points ∼74% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=656)
3080 Points ∼91% +19%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1294 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1090 Points ∼68% -16%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1310 Points ∼81% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1608 Points ∼100% +24%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
323 Points ∼20% -75%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1106 Points ∼69% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1090 - 1312, n=6)
1236 Points ∼77% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=656)
1545 Points ∼96% +19%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
11374 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6969 Points ∼16% -39%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
16684 Points ∼38% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6969 - 16684, n=4)
12860 Points ∼30% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 82947, n=41)
43533 Points ∼100% +283%
MEM (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
30734 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
27672 Points ∼58% -10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
28689 Points ∼60% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (27672 - 30734, n=4)
29440 Points ∼61% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (24176 - 100390, n=41)
48115 Points ∼100% +57%
GPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
10803 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
9258 Points ∼11% -14%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9335 Points ∼11% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9258 - 10803, n=4)
10049 Points ∼12% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 209164, n=41)
81672 Points ∼100% +656%
CPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
41690 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
40746 Points ∼46% -2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
41127 Points ∼46% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (40746 - 41690, n=4)
41220 Points ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40620 - 168185, n=41)
89213 Points ∼100% +114%
Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
94601 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
84645 Points ∼32% -11%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
95835 Points ∼36% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (84645 - 99193, n=4)
93569 Points ∼36% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 534558, n=41)
262580 Points ∼100% +178%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=123)
36.2 Points ∼100% +117%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.488 Points ∼59% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
16.678 Points ∼46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (15.9 - 16.9, n=5)
16.4 Points ∼45% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
15.963 Points ∼44% -4%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
15.921 Points ∼44% -5%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
12.933 Points ∼36% -22%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=552)
42.8 Points ∼100% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
39.076 Points ∼91% +53%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
27.086 Points ∼63% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (25.3 - 27.1, n=6)
26.3 Points ∼61% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
25.622 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
25.252 Points ∼59% -1%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
22.823 Points ∼53% -11%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=111)
39.8 runs/min ∼100% +129%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.63 runs/min ∼54% +24%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
18.23 runs/min ∼46% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (17.4 - 18.5, n=5)
18 runs/min ∼45% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
17.4 runs/min ∼44% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
17.4 runs/min ∼44%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=184)
67.2 Points ∼100% +104%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
48 Points ∼71% +45%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
38 Points ∼57% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (32 - 38, n=6)
35.2 Points ∼52% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
33 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
32 Points ∼48% -3%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
26 Points ∼39% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
7470 Points ∼100% +63%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=713)
6988 Points ∼94% +52%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
4810 Points ∼64% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4512 - 4958, n=6)
4731 Points ∼63% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
4585 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
4512 Points ∼60% -2%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
4258 Points ∼57% -7%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
4114 Points ∼55% -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
12799.1 ms * ∼100% -28%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
11757.3 ms * ∼92% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=738)
10360 ms * ∼81% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
10126.5 ms * ∼79% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
9976.3 ms * ∼78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9768 - 10143, n=6)
9963 ms * ∼78% -0%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
9768.3 ms * ∼76% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
5546.4 ms * ∼43% +44%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 8Xiaomi Redmi 8ANokia 4.2Samsung Galaxy A20eLG K50Wiko View 3Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
9%
-38%
5%
-9%
-8%
30%
17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.7 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
64.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
58.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
63.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
57.8 (11.2 - 74.7, n=110)
-9%
49.9 (1.7 - 87.1, n=458)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
79.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
78.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
81.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
76.8 (21.1 - 87.2, n=110)
-12%
68.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=458)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
7.33
15.8
116%
4.31
-41%
13.18
80%
12.03
64%
8.98
23%
25.6 (3.4 - 125, n=125)
249%
24.5 (0.14 - 259, n=788)
234%
Random Read 4KB
78.98
73.1
-7%
17.51
-78%
79.76
1%
52.12
-34%
55.23
-30%
56 (11.4 - 149, n=125)
-29%
49.8 (1.59 - 226, n=788)
-37%
Sequential Write 256KB
202.65
106.4
-47%
18.17
-91%
103.57
-49%
78.9
-61%
132.39
-35%
172 (40 - 254, n=125)
-15%
102 (2.99 - 590, n=788)
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
285.66
282
-1%
220.39
-23%
300.36
5%
263.42
-8%
287.32
1%
275 (95.6 - 704, n=125)
-4%
284 (12.1 - 1781, n=788)
-1%
PUBG Mobile
0102030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø24.8 (22-26)
; Balanced: Ø23.9 (14-26)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø20.5 (13-31)
; Standard / low: Ø28.8 (20-31)
Carga Máxima
 29.3 °C29.1 °C29.7 °C 
 28.7 °C28.8 °C30.7 °C 
 28.3 °C28.3 °C28.7 °C 
Máximo: 30.7 °C
Médio: 29.1 °C
26.2 °C26.8 °C29.5 °C
26.3 °C26.9 °C28.9 °C
26.7 °C27.4 °C27.4 °C
Máximo: 29.5 °C
Médio: 27.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  25.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.640.32527.523.93119.227.74023.225.75033.537.86325.624.78020.527.91002022.412519.227.216021.138.120016.742.725016.949.531515.954.740015.857.45001563.663014.166.980014.773.8100014.275.8125014.177.7160014.476.2200013.976.925001477.6315014.677400014.177.1500014.479.6630014.476.9800015.3761000014.976.61250015.877160001760.3SPL26.788.6N0.874.4median 14.9median 75.8Delta1.612.936.742.733.637.834.335.133.830.63933.534.831.43130.530.232.123.228.122.835.322.636.919.844.220.150.316.951.916.856.915.259.415.864.915.869.314.569.31570.914.17015.369.814.971.614.969.614.770.114.769.614.970.814.873.215.361.615.45227.881.6149.8median 15.3median 64.92.110.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 8Samsung Galaxy A20e
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.57 / 1.8 / 1.82 Watt
Carga midlight 2.57 / 4.12 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 8
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
5000 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
LG K50
3500 mAh
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-41%
-15%
1%
4%
4%
-36%
-33%
Idle Minimum *
0.57
0.9
-58%
0.74
-30%
0.66
-16%
0.7
-23%
0.67
-18%
0.82 (0.57 - 1.28, n=6)
-44%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=807)
-54%
Idle Average *
1.8
1.8
-0%
1.9
-6%
1.63
9%
1
44%
1.73
4%
2.21 (1.6 - 4.5, n=6)
-23%
1.742 (0.6 - 6.2, n=806)
3%
Idle Maximum *
1.82
2.4
-32%
2.21
-21%
1.67
8%
1.8
1%
1.79
2%
2.49 (1.73 - 4.59, n=6)
-37%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=807)
-12%
Load Average *
2.57
4.3
-67%
3.04
-18%
2.77
-8%
2.4
7%
2.18
15%
3.78 (2.57 - 5.71, n=6)
-47%
4.08 (0.8 - 10.8, n=801)
-59%
Load Maximum *
4.12
6
-46%
4.15
-1%
3.66
11%
4.5
-9%
3.43
17%
5.24 (4.12 - 6.99, n=6)
-27%
5.95 (1.2 - 14.2, n=801)
-44%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
42h 01min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19h 17min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 18min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 08min
Xiaomi Redmi 8
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
5000 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
LG K50
3500 mAh
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
11%
-40%
-27%
-29%
-14%
Reader / Idle
2521
1903
-25%
1432
-43%
H.264
798
1193
49%
753
-6%
WiFi v1.3
1157
1145
-1%
696
-40%
715
-38%
822
-29%
995
-14%
Load
308
367
19%
250
-19%

Pro

+ Belo design
+ Bem construído
+ Bom sensor de digitais
+ Slot Dual SIM + microSD real
+ Duração da bateria muito longa
+ Boas câmeras para um telefone econômico
+ Painel IPS brilhante e rico em contraste...

Contra

- ...com uma resolução HD típica de sua classe
- Somente certificação Widevine L3, apesar da existência de uma edição global
- Desempenho típica de sua classe
- Memória lenta
- Sem NFC

Veredicto - O Xiaomi Redmi 8 define novos padrões para smartphones econômicos

The Xiaomi Redmi 8 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Trading Shenzhen.
The Xiaomi Redmi 8 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Trading Shenzhen.

O Redmi 8, que é muito semelhante ao Redmi 8A no papel, é uma atualização significativa em relação a seus irmãos, mesmo que pareçam quase idênticos. O primeiro não apenas possui câmeras aprimoradas e um alto-falante melhor, mas também possui melhor conectividade e uma tela visivelmente melhorada. No geral, embora tenhamos recomendado o Redmi 8A mais barato ao analisá-lo, o Redmi 8 oferece uma relação custo/benefício ainda melhor. Em suma, o mais recente smartphone Redmi de orçamento da Xiaomi define novos padrões para smartphones abaixo de 120 euros (~US$ 133), principalmente porque não possui deficiências sérias.

No entanto, a Xiaomi fez alguns compromissos, o que não é de surpreender, considerando o baixo preço recomendado do dispositivo. O Redmi 8 é e continua sendo um smartphone de nível de entrada. Consequentemente, a Xiaomi equipou o dispositivo com um SoC fraco, uma tela de baixa resolução, armazenamento flash eMMC e um módulo Wi-Fi lento. Por apenas 30 Euros (~US$ 33) a mais, o Redmi Note 8 é uma alternativa interessante ao Redmi 8, pois oferece desempenho notavelmente melhor com quase nenhum esforço maior.

O Xiaomi Redmi 8 oferece mais do que a maioria dos smartphones abaixo de 120 euros (~US$ 133). Se o preço é o fator limitante para o seu próximo smartphone, o Redmi 8 seria uma boa opção.

Xiaomi Redmi 8 - 01/20/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
82%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
42 / 70 → 59%
Peso
89%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 64 → 9%
Desempenho da aplicação
45 / 86 → 52%
Temperatura
95%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
52%
Médio
71%
76%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 8: Telefone de orçamento da Xiaomi define novos padrões
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-01-28 (Update: 2020-02- 2)