Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto Z2 Force

Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/01/2018

A prova de balas? O smartphone Motorola Moto Z2 Force de gama alta é o membro mais recente da família Moto Z e, conforme esperado, é compatível com as atualizações do Moto Mods. Além disso, ele está equipado com ShatterShield: uma tecnologia de tela que supostamente faz com que a tela seja completamente à prova de quebra.

Motorola Moto Z2 Force
Placa gráfica
Memória
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 534 PPI, Tela QHD 1440p Super AMOLED, ShatterShield, OLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 46.2 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm via USB-C dongle, Card Reader: microSD de até 2 TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Leitor de digitais, acelerômetro, giroscópio, magnetômetro, barômetro, sensor de proximidade, ultra sônico, monitor de áudio, 2x2 MIMO, USB-OTG, Moto-Mods
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2 (Android 7.1.1), 5.0 (nach Upgrade auf Android 8.0), GSM (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1,900, 2,100 MHz), LTE (B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 46), Download up to 1000 MBit/s, Upload up to 75 MBit/s, Nano-SIM, head SAR 0,405 W/kg, body SAR 1,450 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 5.99 x 155.8 x 76
Bateria
2730 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/2.0, IMX386, color + 12 MP, f/2.0, IMX386, b/w, 1.25 µm, depth perception and field of depth effects, phase detection autofocus (PDAF), laser autofocus, color-compensation dual LED flash (CCT), videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix Apertura f/2.2, lente de ângulo amplo de 85°, modo noturno automático, software de melhoria de imagem
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante frontal, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Cabo USB-C para USB-A, adaptador de áudio de USB-C para 3,5 mm, carregador de 15 W (5V, 3A), guia de início rápido, ferramenta SIM, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
143 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
799 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
914 MBit/s ∼100% +60%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s ∼72% +15%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
573 MBit/s ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
503 MBit/s ∼55% -12%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
394 MBit/s ∼43% -31%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼37% -41%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
653 MBit/s ∼93% +11%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 MBit/s ∼91% +9%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
587 MBit/s ∼83%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
374 MBit/s ∼53% -36%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼32% -62%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force: overview
Motorola Moto Z2 Force: overview
Motorola Moto Z2 Force: intersection
Motorola Moto Z2 Force: intersection
Motorola Moto Z2 Force: turning point
Motorola Moto Z2 Force: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: intersection
Garmin Edge 500: intersection
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
507
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
508
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 573 cd/m² Médio: 526.1 cd/m² Minimum: 8.91 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 511 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.8-23.34 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.7
Gamma: 2.11
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
OLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3
HTC U11
Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
29%
16%
11%
-15%
27%
Brightness middle
511
629
23%
530
4%
482
-6%
432
-15%
559
9%
Brightness
526
636
21%
536
2%
472
-10%
428
-19%
538
2%
Brightness Distribution
88
94
7%
93
6%
90
2%
87
-1%
90
2%
Black Level *
0.33
0.38
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.3
1.7
60%
2.6
40%
3.2
26%
4.18
3%
1.3
70%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.7
2.4
35%
2.7
27%
2.2
41%
5.3
-43%
1.8
51%
Gamma
2.11 114%
2.15 112%
2.04 118%
2.22 108%
2.33 103%
2.25 107%
CCT
7075 92%
6337 103%
6206 105%
6581 99%
7487 87%
6797 96%
Contrast
1461
1471

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9024 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.2 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
179595 Points ∼79%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼78% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
173997 Points ∼76% -3%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼77% -3%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼76% -3%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
218158 Points ∼96% +21%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6998 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼67% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
5096 Points ∼49% -27%
HTC U11
6828 Points ∼66% -2%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼54% -20%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
8553 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6084 Points ∼71% -29%
HTC U11
8295 Points ∼97% -3%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼80% -20%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
1300 Points ∼77%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼73% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1235 Points ∼73% -5%
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼72% -6%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼59% -22%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6144 Points ∼66%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼40% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6121 Points ∼66% 0%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼65% -3%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼64% -3%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3652 Points ∼83%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼94% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3095 Points ∼70% -15%
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼47% -43%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼47% -43%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
5918 Points ∼58%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼51% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
5308 Points ∼52% -10%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼54% -6%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼41% -28%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3625 Points ∼96%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼83% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3338 Points ∼88% -8%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼80% -16%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼71% -25%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
8310 Points ∼92%
HTC U11
8281 Points ∼92%
LG V30
8016 Points ∼89%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6711 Points ∼27%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼27% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6744 Points ∼27% 0%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼26% -4%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼24% -9%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
10558 Points ∼42% +57%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
1911 Points ∼32%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼32% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2028 Points ∼34% +6%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼32% 0%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼32% -1%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
4263 Points ∼72% +123%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
2986 Points ∼97%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼93% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2346 Points ∼76% -21%
HTC U11
2841 Points ∼92% -5%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼95% -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2109 Points ∼69% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3991 Points ∼74%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼53% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2661 Points ∼49% -33%
HTC U11
3883 Points ∼72% -3%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼72% -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3069 Points ∼57% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3713 Points ∼96%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼73% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2584 Points ∼67% -30%
HTC U11
3590 Points ∼92% -3%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼94% -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2781 Points ∼72% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3071 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2342 Points ∼76% -24%
HTC U11
2832 Points ∼92% -8%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼91% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6035 Points ∼78%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼43% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3928 Points ∼51% -35%
HTC U11
5877 Points ∼76% -3%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼76% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
4969 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3414 Points ∼69% -31%
HTC U11
4744 Points ∼95% -5%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼95% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
21239 Points ∼29%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼31% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
22829 Points ∼32% +7%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼28% -5%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼20% -31%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points ∼36% +21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
55485 Points ∼12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼7% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
36807 Points ∼8% -34%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼12% 0%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼12% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points ∼24% +104%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
40848 Points ∼20%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼15% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
32399 Points ∼16% -21%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼20% -2%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼17% -16%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points ∼32% +58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
105 fps ∼8%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼8% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
105 fps ∼8% 0%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼7% -13%
LG V30
113 fps ∼8% +8%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
166.9 fps ∼12% +59%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
60 fps ∼13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
59 fps ∼13% -2%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼13% -3%
LG V30
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
119.4 fps ∼26% +99%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
54 fps ∼10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼10% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
51 fps ∼9% -6%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼9% -6%
LG V30
59 fps ∼11% +9%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
71 fps ∼13% +31%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
36 fps ∼10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼15% +56%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
38 fps ∼10% +6%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼8% -19%
LG V30
35 fps ∼10% -3%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
79.2 fps ∼22% +120%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
40 fps ∼10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼9% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
42 fps ∼10% +5%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼8% -17%
LG V30
40 fps ∼10% 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
49 fps ∼12% +23%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
22 fps ∼13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼22% +73%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
23 fps ∼13% +5%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼9% -32%
LG V30
19 fps ∼11% -14%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
56.4 fps ∼32% +156%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
25 fps ∼7%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼6% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
25 fps ∼7% 0%
HTC U11
24 fps ∼7% -4%
LG V30
24 fps ∼7% -4%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
15 fps ∼0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼1% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
13 fps ∼0% -13%
HTC U11
13 fps ∼0% -13%
LG V30
13 fps ∼0% -13%

Legend

 
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
223.5 Points ∼100% +235%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
69.57 Points ∼31% +4%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
69.51 Points ∼31% +4%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
66.689 Points ∼30%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼25% -15%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼24% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
35209 Points ∼100% +172%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
13265 Points ∼38% +3%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
12929 Points ∼37%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
11781 Points ∼33% -9%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼30% -19%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼30% -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼100% -14%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼99% -13%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
3175.3 ms * ∼87%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
2760.3 ms * ∼76% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
1876.8 ms * ∼52% +41%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
719.7 ms * ∼20% +77%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
362 Points ∼100% +125%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
162 Points ∼45% +1%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
161 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
159 Points ∼44% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼44% -2%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼38% -14%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto Z2 ForceHuawei Mate 10 ProSamsung Galaxy Note 8HTC U11LG V30
AndroBench 3-5
25%
-16%
-11%
-30%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
54.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
46.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
47.2
-14%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
68.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
62.8
-19%
Random Write 4KB
78.62
164.45
109%
14.55
-81%
79.97
2%
10.21
-87%
Random Read 4KB
148.76
132.27
-11%
122.48
-18%
91.45
-39%
78.17
-47%
Sequential Write 256KB
213.61
208.72
-2%
205.85
-4%
206.41
-3%
193.22
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB
696.35
732.46
5%
796.96
14%
717.33
3%
669.48
-4%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
comparado com
Motorola Moto X Play (min)
 615 MSM8939, Adreno 405
20
   ...
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
 835, Adreno 540
60
OnePlus 5T
 835, Adreno 540
60
   ...
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (max)
 835, Adreno 540
60
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Carga Máxima
 31.8 °C33.5 °C34.5 °C 
 32.1 °C33.9 °C34.8 °C 
 32.1 °C33.9 °C35 °C 
Máximo: 35 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C
34.9 °C34.2 °C32.8 °C
34.5 °C34.2 °C32.6 °C
35.4 °C35 °C33.4 °C
Máximo: 35.4 °C
Médio: 34.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  23.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.245.92532.943.63137.237.84031.746.75039.643.66328.333.38027.334.810026.931.112526.733.11602439.220020.946.425020.949.531519.55440018.561.450017.567.963017.570.680015.770.6100015.870.3125016.671.9160015.873.9200015.475.5250015.57431501672.5400015.872.350001672.9630016.372.4800016.372.91000016.274.31250016.473.31600016.465.9SPL28.684.8N1.161.7median 16.4Motorola Moto Z2 Forcemedian 70.6Delta2.18.935.237.832.934.237.235.631.737.139.64028.327.927.32626.924.326.723.72433.420.941.220.951.919.551.218.560.317.55617.555.915.755.115.865.716.669.515.874.215.47715.574.91673.315.870.41670.816.373.116.372.916.273.516.468.816.455.828.684.41.154.7median 16.4Huawei Mate 10 Promedian 65.72.110.831.631.325.427.225.326.132.925.133.624.531.62628.4242728.220.828.22234.521.348.320.852.321.257.619.460.119.563.917.767.117.965.517.868.617.372.117.474.616.776.217.278.418.281.117.977.417.672.817.775.417.877.917.970.918.167.118.258.13086.91.369.1median 17.9Samsung Galaxy Note 8median 67.11.310.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Motorola Moto Z2 Force audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy Note 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.21 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.52 / 0.84 / 0.85 Watt
Carga midlight 2.71 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
2730 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3300 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2691 mAh
Power Consumption
-43%
-46%
-77%
-41%
-99%
Idle Minimum *
0.52
0.85
-63%
0.73
-40%
0.73
-40%
0.72
-38%
0.72
-38%
Idle Average *
0.84
1.15
-37%
1.44
-71%
1.96
-133%
1.37
-63%
2.45
-192%
Idle Maximum *
0.85
1.23
-45%
1.53
-80%
1.98
-133%
1.41
-66%
2.52
-196%
Load Average *
2.71
4.12
-52%
4.56
-68%
4.82
-78%
3.46
-28%
3.84
-42%
Load Maximum *
7.2
8.42
-17%
5.09
29%
7.15
1%
7.83
-9%
9.02
-25%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
27h 10min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 31min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 54min
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
2730 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3300 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2691 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
22%
-23%
-24%
10%
1%
23%
Reader / Idle
1630
1744
7%
1134
-30%
1250
-23%
1914
17%
2085
28%
1589
-3%
H.264
811
929
15%
662
-18%
498
-39%
822
1%
733
-10%
946
17%
WiFi v1.3
531
818
54%
474
-11%
560
5%
774
46%
657
24%
749
41%
Load
354
398
12%
246
-31%
212
-40%
267
-25%
211
-40%
477
35%

Pro

+ Desempenho muito alto
+ Tela à prova de quebra
+ Atualizável e aprimorável graças aos Moto Mods
+ Atualização do Android 8.0 anunciada
+ Velocidade de Wi-Fi muito rápidas
+ Brilhante tela WQHD OLED
+ Boa câmera
+ Permanece suficientemente frio
+ Alto-falante de qualidade decente
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Carga rápida

Contra

- A tela sofre de arranhões muito facilmente
- A carcaça não é resistente à água
- Conector de áudio somente via adaptador
- lot dual SIM híbrido
- Desempenho ruim da câmera em situações de baixa iluminação
- PWM flickering
- Afogamento sob carga máxima
In review: Motorola Moto Z2 Force. Review unit courtesy of Lenovo Germany.
In review: Motorola Moto Z2 Force. Review unit courtesy of Lenovo Germany.

Sem dúvida, o Moto Z2 Force é um smartphone de gama alta excepcional com muitos pros e alguns contras. Primeiro o primeiro: o desempenho de jogos e aplicativos, velocidades de transferência Wi-Fi, sua brilhante tela WQHD OLED e a tela à prova de quebra são excelentes. O Android 8.0, que já está disponível em alguns países selecionados, é uma atualização esperada e vai preparar este smartphone para o futuro, ainda mais.

Assim como toda a família Moto Z, a Moto Z2 Force também se beneficia dos Moto Mods que são fáceis de usar e podem adicionar recursos incrivelmente úteis. É verdade que acessórios de terceiros geralmente são mais baratos, mas a facilidade de uso de um Moto Mod é absolutamente deslumbrante. E ao contrário de muitos outros acessórios fabricados pelo fabricante, os Moto Mods não são específicos do modelo, mas podem ser usados em uma ampla variedade de smartphones Motorola. Se você já possui uma série de Moto Mods e está procurando um novo smartphone para usá-los, por que não considerar o decentemente equipado e muito mais barato Moto Z2 Playde gama média? 

O virtualmente indestrutível Motorola Moto Z2 Force oferece um desempenho fenomenal. De todas as coisas, é a proteção da tela com sua susceptibilidade a arranhões que nos mais nos incomodou.

Infelizmente, não podemos recomendar a Moto Z2 Force sem emitir pelo menos algumas advertências. Estranhamente, a única característica que torna este smartphone excepcional - a proteção da tela - também é sua maior fraqueza: ela sofre de arranhões muito facilmente. Ao contrário de seus concorrentes, como o Huawei Mate 10 Pro, o Z2 Force não possui uma certificação IP67 e, portanto, não é nem resistente à poeira, somente à água. A câmera se desempenhou muito bem em condições de iluminação ideais, mas não conseguiu nos impressionar em condições de pouca luz, apesar do seu sensor duplo, supostamente projetado especificamente para melhorar a fotografia com pouca luz.

Motorola Moto Z2 Force - 01/15/2018 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
74 / 75 → 99%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
47 / 60 → 78%
Peso
93%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
64 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
71 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
81%
Médio
81%
89%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto Z2 Force
Manuel Masiero, 2018-02- 1 (Update: 2018-02- 8)