Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 6

Daniel Schmidt & Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/03/2018

Soberbo pela sexta vez. A OnePlus continua com sua alta taxa de lançamentos, liberando o sucessor do OnePlus 5T após apenas 6 meses: O OnePlus 6. O Smartphone agora tem um novo SoC, uma nova traseira de vidro, um notch e, supostamente, também as câmeras deveriam ter sido melhoradas. Em nossa análise, descobrimos se vale a pena a mudança rápida.
Atualização: Análise finalizada.

OnePlus 6
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 630
Memória
8192 MB 
Pantalha
6.28 polegadas 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, 10 pontos multi-touch, Optic AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 2 lanes, 116 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB e conector de áudio de 3,5mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Hall, acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola eletrônica, sensor hub, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, USB OTG, Wifi Direct, Miracast,
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1.800 und 1.900 MHz), UMTS/WCDMA/HSPA+ (Band 1/2/4/5/8/9/19), CDMA (BC0/BC1), LTE Cat. 16 (FDD: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/29/30/32/66/71, TDD: 34/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.75 x 155.7 x 75.4
Bateria
12.5 Wh, 3300 mAh Lítio-Ion, Quick charge de até 20 watts
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (Sony IMX 519, 1.22 µm, OIS, EIS, DCAF, f/1.7, Ultra-HD-Video) + 20 MPix (Sony IMX 376K, 1.0 µm, f/1.7, PDAF)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (Sony IMX 371, 1.0 µm, EIS, Fixed-focus, f/2.0, Full-HD-Video)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Protetor de tela, capa protetora, carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, informação de segurança, guia de início rápido, OxygenOS 5.1, 24 Meses Garantia, aptX and aptx HD, RGB notification LED; Bandwidth (download/​upload): 1000Mbps/​150Mbps (LTE); SAR values FCC: 1,26 W/kg (Head), 0,9 W/kg (Body); SAR values EU: 1,33 W/kg (Head), 1,38 W/kg (Body), fanless
peso
177 g, Suprimento de energia: 111 g
Preço
529 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
939 MBit/s ∼100% +54%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
669 MBit/s ∼71% +10%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s ∼70% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼69% +7%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
609 MBit/s ∼65%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s ∼41% -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 939, n=224)
194 MBit/s ∼21% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s ∼92% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 MBit/s ∼90% +3%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
612 MBit/s ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼74% -15%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
456 MBit/s ∼65% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.7 - 703, n=224)
188 MBit/s ∼27% -69%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Grove
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Grove
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS OnePlus 6 – Overview
GPS OnePlus 6 – Overview
GPS OnePlus 6 – Grove
GPS OnePlus 6 – Grove
GPS OnePlus 6 – Bridge
GPS OnePlus 6 – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Reference card photographed
Reference card photographed
Reference card detail
429
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 471 cd/m² Médio: 436.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.24 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 430 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
OnePlus 6
Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28
Sony Xperia XZ2
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01
Screen
26%
15%
-48%
34%
6%
Brightness middle
430
630
47%
565
31%
432
0%
600
40%
425
-1%
Brightness
437
632
45%
571
31%
428
-2%
606
39%
423
-3%
Brightness Distribution
87
96
10%
96
10%
87
0%
94
8%
92
6%
Black Level *
0.44
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.3
1.5
35%
2.3
-0%
4.18
-82%
1.2
48%
2.1
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.6
4.3
7%
4.8
-4%
8.53
-85%
3
35%
3.4
26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
2.1
12%
1.9
21%
5.3
-121%
1.6
33%
2.5
-4%
Gamma
2.28 105%
2.17 111%
2.16 111%
2.33 103%
2.23 108%
2.32 103%
CCT
6160 106%
6513 100%
6332 103%
7487 87%
6707 97%
6455 101%
Contrast
1432

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 236 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 236 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 236 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10727 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.6 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
230421 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
225663 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼96% -4%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points ∼86% -14%
OnePlus 5T
172124 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 230421, n=6)
214821 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (23540 - 230421, n=318)
70716 Points ∼31% -69%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
266686 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
266981 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼94% -6%
Apple iPhone X
256297 Points ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 5T
214815 Points ∼80% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (255739 - 290397, n=8)
266770 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (42032 - 290397, n=93)
110891 Points ∼42% -58%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
8282 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8069 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼64% -36%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼68% -32%
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7717 - 8601, n=7)
8168 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3210 - 8601, n=182)
4480 Points ∼54% -46%
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
9630 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
9319 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼60% -40%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼71% -29%
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (9179 - 10264, n=6)
9579 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4711 - 10264, n=345)
4696 Points ∼49% -51%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
1386 Points ∼82%
Sony Xperia XZ2
1346 Points ∼80% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼66% -20%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼60% -27%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼100% +21%
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼79% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1234 - 1437, n=6)
1361 Points ∼81% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=420)
673 Points ∼40% -51%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
7949 Points ∼86%
Sony Xperia XZ2
7868 Points ∼85% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼69% -20%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼64% -25%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼66% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7868 - 7957, n=6)
7924 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=420)
1514 Points ∼16% -81%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
3799 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ2
2193 Points ∼57% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼68% -31%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼54% -45%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼32% -68%
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 3799, n=6)
3155 Points ∼82% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=420)
1115 Points ∼29% -71%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
8228 Points ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8402 Points ∼82% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼62% -22%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼41% -48%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼57% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5792 - 8435, n=6)
7798 Points ∼76% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=420)
2222 Points ∼22% -73%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
4308 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3738 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼77% -23%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼63% -37%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3614 - 4308, n=6)
4016 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=423)
1131 Points ∼26% -74%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
14362 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼43%
LG V30
8016 Points ∼56%
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points ∼56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12493 - 14362, n=3)
13643 Points ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 14362, n=118)
3891 Points ∼27%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
8510 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼87%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼59%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8437 - 8937, n=5)
8637 Points ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 10558, n=164)
4032 Points ∼39%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
2464 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼89%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2429 - 2464, n=5)
2449 Points ∼57%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 4265, n=165)
1200 Points ∼28%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
3432 Points ∼95%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3630 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼68% -28%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼81% -15%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼65% -31%
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼85% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2606 - 3669, n=6)
3298 Points ∼91% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (531 - 3669, n=272)
1552 Points ∼43% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
5212 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
5122 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼69% -31%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼66% -34%
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5212, n=6)
4861 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 5212, n=272)
1065 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
4673 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
4693 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼69% -30%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼77% -22%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3419 - 4732, n=6)
4373 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 4732, n=280)
1018 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
3452 Points ∼95%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3642 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼69% -28%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼77% -19%
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼83% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3642, n=6)
3043 Points ∼84% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (537 - 3642, n=302)
1449 Points ∼40% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
8252 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8122 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼56% -44%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼71% -29%
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼70% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8252, n=6)
7399 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 8252, n=302)
1428 Points ∼17% -83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
6304 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ2
6378 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼61% -38%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼74% -25%
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4540 - 6378, n=6)
5593 Points ∼88% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6378, n=310)
1228 Points ∼19% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
34191 Points ∼95%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35856 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼73% -23%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼41% -57%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼71% -25%
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼60% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (27817 - 36494, n=6)
33069 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=455)
12109 Points ∼34% -65%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
81269 Points ∼72%
Sony Xperia XZ2
80233 Points ∼71% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼41% -43%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼49% -32%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼100% +38%
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼52% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (76078 - 81726, n=6)
79918 Points ∼71% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=455)
15527 Points ∼14% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
62241 Points ∼97%
Sony Xperia XZ2
62926 Points ∼98% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼62% -36%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼53% -45%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼65% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (56669 - 63084, n=6)
60664 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=456)
13411 Points ∼21% -78%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
150 fps ∼85%
Sony Xperia XZ2
150 fps ∼85% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼83% -2%
LG V30
113 fps ∼64% -25%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼100% +18%
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼64% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 151, n=6)
141 fps ∼79% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.2 - 177, n=481)
26.8 fps ∼15% -82%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
60 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼100% 0%
LG V30
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (59 - 60, n=5)
59.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7.5 - 120, n=484)
23.4 fps ∼39% -61%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
66 fps ∼75%
Sony Xperia XZ2
82 fps ∼93% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼84% +12%
LG V30
59 fps ∼67% -11%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼100% +34%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼68% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (66 - 82, n=5)
73.8 fps ∼84% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=406)
14.3 fps ∼16% -78%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
58 fps ∼98%
Sony Xperia XZ2
59 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼76% -22%
LG V30
35 fps ∼59% -40%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼99% +1%
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼90% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 59, n=5)
54 fps ∼92% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=408)
14.4 fps ∼24% -75%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
56 fps ∼93%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼78% -16%
LG V30
40 fps ∼67% -29%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼82% -13%
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼68% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (39 - 60.9, n=6)
56 fps ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=271)
12.5 fps ∼21% -78%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
54 fps ∼98%
Sony Xperia XZ2
55 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼44% -56%
LG V30
19 fps ∼35% -65%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼80% -18%
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼67% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (31 - 55, n=5)
50 fps ∼91% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 110, n=273)
12.5 fps ∼23% -77%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼80% -20%
LG V30
24 fps ∼69% -31%
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 35, n=5)
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.77 - 35, n=202)
8.61 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
32 fps ∼97%
Sony Xperia XZ2
33 fps ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼42% -56%
LG V30
13 fps ∼39% -59%
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼70% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (20 - 34, n=5)
30.4 fps ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 50, n=205)
7.8 fps ∼24% -76%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6
1169 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1481 Points ∼87% +27%
Apple iPhone X
1702 Points ∼100% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
1169 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 1702, n=61)
578 Points ∼34% -51%

Legend

 
OnePlus 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼100% +155%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
89.54 Points ∼40% +2%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
87.695 Points ∼39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (69.8 - 89.5, n=7)
85.2 Points ∼38% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼31% -21%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼30% -24%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼24% -40%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=339)
34.4 Points ∼15% -61%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +107%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
17026 Points ∼48%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
16774 Points ∼48% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (14491 - 17131, n=7)
16340 Points ∼46% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼42% -13%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼35% -27%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼30% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=475)
5013 Points ∼14% -71%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=494)
11873 ms * ∼100% -386%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼31% -48%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼26% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2394 - 2868, n=7)
2492 ms * ∼21% -2%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
2445 ms * ∼21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
2394.3 ms * ∼20% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼17% +16%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼6% +71%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼100% +40%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
262 Points ∼74% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (228 - 291, n=7)
255 Points ∼72% +1%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
252 Points ∼71%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼51% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼46% -35%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼39% -45%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=237)
98.3 Points ∼28% -61%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 6Sony Xperia XZ2Samsung Galaxy S9 PlusLG V30OnePlus 5TAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-5%
4%
-27%
-3%
108%
-63%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
30.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
47.2
58.2 (51.3 - 65.1, n=2)
43 (20.8 - 87.1, n=253)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
34.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.8
78.2 (75.4 - 81, n=2)
61.4 (36.5 - 96.5, n=253)
Random Write 4KB
21.8
17
-22%
22.74
4%
10.21
-53%
20
-8%
114 (20 - 164, n=10)
423%
13.3 (0.14 - 164, n=528)
-39%
Random Read 4KB
137
149.4
9%
129.68
-5%
78.17
-43%
138.1
1%
140 (132 - 147, n=10)
2%
34 (1.59 - 173, n=528)
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
201.4
198.7
-1%
204.94
2%
193.22
-4%
203.4
1%
202 (192 - 212, n=10)
0%
70.1 (2.99 - 216, n=528)
-65%
Sequential Read 256KB
725.6
679.2
-6%
818.69
13%
669.48
-8%
698.7
-4%
768 (699 - 832, n=10)
6%
208 (12.1 - 832, n=528)
-71%
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min60 fps
 high HD60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
 minimal60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
PUBG Mobile
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 Smooth60 fps
 Balanced40 fps
 HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 45.3 °C40.2 °C36.9 °C 
 43.3 °C40.1 °C37.5 °C 
 42.3 °C39.2 °C36.9 °C 
Máximo: 45.3 °C
Médio: 40.2 °C
35.7 °C37.8 °C42.5 °C
35.5 °C37.4 °C38.7 °C
35.8 °C37.6 °C39.3 °C
Máximo: 42.5 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C
Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
The maximum temp on the upper side is 45.3 °C, compared to the average of 35.9 °C ranging from 21.1 °C to 71 °C for class Smartphone.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2022.924.32524.224.13125.1254022.230.25027.739.96317.420.78017.517.210014.918.61251419.516014.732.120012.243.425013.649.531513.153.940010.857.25009.754.26309.357.18009.66210008.26612508.168.11600869.920007.771.325007.875.131507.874.440007.869.450007.864.463007.857.480008.159.7100008.157.9125008.147.9160008.129.2SPL57.920.681.6N9.90.343.5median 8.1OnePlus 6median 57.4Delta2.21135.240.732.946.337.244.431.748.639.648.928.337.627.329.926.933.726.732.92445.520.955.320.956.619.559.118.568.417.564.917.567.415.766.215.87016.672.715.873.815.474.415.575.91679.315.8781671.816.371.516.371.416.272.416.464.716.446.328.686.31.165.5median 16.4OnePlus 5Tmedian 68.42.18.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 5T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.6 / 1 / 1.6 Watt
Carga midlight 4.3 / 8.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-43%
-39%
11%
-44%
-2%
-31%
-18%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.75
-25%
0.72
-20%
0.68
-13%
1.03
-72%
0.58
3%
0.746 (0.42 - 1.16, n=7)
-24%
0.86 (0.2 - 3.4, n=557)
-43%
Idle Average *
1
2.25
-125%
2.21
-121%
0.95
5%
2.4
-140%
1.44
-44%
1.809 (1 - 2.25, n=7)
-81%
1.694 (0.6 - 6.2, n=556)
-69%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
2.26
-41%
2.22
-39%
1.09
32%
2.6
-63%
1.53
4%
2.03 (1.57 - 2.3, n=7)
-27%
1.934 (0.74 - 6.6, n=557)
-21%
Load Average *
4.3
4.89
-14%
4.6
-7%
4.58
-7%
2.96
31%
3.17
26%
4.9 (4.3 - 6.25, n=7)
-14%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=551)
8%
Load Maximum *
8.6
9.6
-12%
9.34
-9%
5.16
40%
6.6
23%
8.54
1%
9.3 (8.3 - 10.2, n=7)
-8%
5.59 (1.2 - 14.2, n=551)
35%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
30h 06min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 11min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 06min
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Battery Runtime
-6%
-19%
-19%
-1%
-25%
Reader / Idle
1806
1678
-7%
1402
-22%
1343
-26%
1754
-3%
1292
-28%
H.264
791
718
-9%
722
-9%
674
-15%
799
1%
634
-20%
WiFi v1.3
762
716
-6%
679
-11%
521
-32%
718
-6%
564
-26%
Load
246
239
-3%
159
-35%
237
-4%
257
4%
180
-27%

Pro

+ Carcaça de muito alta qualidade
+ Suite de software muito fino
+ Internet muito veloz
+ Gigabit LTE
+ GPS preciso
+ Boa qualidade de voz
+ Câmeras muito boas
+ Boa seleção de acessórios
+ Muitas configurações de usabilidade
+ Enorme desempenho disponível
+ Baixo consumo de energia
+ Muito boa duração da bateria
+ Quick charge muito rápida

Contra

- Sem certificação IP
- Sem leitor de cartões MicroSD
- Tela um pouco escura demais e cintilante
- Afogamento sob uso intenso
- Aumento notável da temperatura
Review: OnePlus 6
Review: OnePlus 6

O OnePlus 6 é um smartphone de alta qualidade, oferecendo recursos de ponta com uma excelente relação preço-desempenho. No entanto, seu preço baixo n{ao é coincidência: A OnePlus desconsidera completamente o assunto da RV, que também é refletido na tecnologia da tela, onde a resolução FHD+ precisa ser suficiente. No geral, não parece haver nenhum avanço em termos de painel, o entalhe é puramente uma questão de gosto. Teríamos desejado algo semelhante à tela True-Tone da Apple ou a um painel de 120 Hz. Para começar, o monobloco de alumínio também segue uma tendência, mas não concede as capacidades de carregamento sem fio de telefone celular da OnePlus. Da mesma forma, em vez de um padrão de transferência mais rápido que poderia oferecer mais recursos, como saída de vídeo ou um modo de área de desktop, o USB 2.0 é invocado.

Em vez disso, o OnePlus conta com as principais competências de um smartphone e equipa seu smartphone mais recente com mais velocidade, um armazenamento maior e mais rápido, um software atualizado e uma boa câmera. No entanto, os avanços em comparação com o predecessor também são marginais. A duração da bateria é quase a mesma que a do antecessor, o que, apesar de não ser uma surpresa, ainda é boa, dado que o OnePlus 5T já era duradouro. Além disso, ele vem com uma tecnologia de carga rápida extremamente rápida, que já conhecemos do OnePlus 5T, mas não leva mais o nome Dash Charge (o nome teve que ser alterado devido a conflitos de licenciamento).

A OnePlus mais uma vez produz um excelente smartphone. Antecipando alguns gimmicks de gama alta, o OnePlus 6 faz um ótimo trabalho em combinar alto desempenho com um preço baixo.

Em resumo, o OnePlus mais uma vez oferece um smartphone muito bom. Mas a concorrência nessa área está aumentando. O Honor 10 com o seu preço agressivo (a partir de 399 Euros), em particular, não é nada para ser ridicularizado e o Asus ZenFone 5z, em breve disponível, bem como o Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s jogam na mesma liga, em termos de tecnologia e preço.

OnePlus 6 - 05/29/2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt & Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
91%
Teclado
70 / 75 → 94%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
47 / 60 → 79%
Peso
90%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
69 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
73 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
87%
Médio
81%
90%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 6
Daniel Schmidt & Florian Wimmer, 2018-06- 3 (Update: 2018-06-21)