Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Oppo Reno2: Desempenho fraco de câmera

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/25/2020

Com câmera selfie motorizada. O Oppo Reno2 promete excelentes recursos para tirar fotos, longa duração da bateria e muito desempenho. Visualmente, o smartphone é definitivamente impressionante. Nossa análise mostrará quais outras qualidades o telefone pode trazer para a mesa.

Oppo Reno2 (Reno Serie)
Placa gráfica
Memória
8192 MB 
Pantalha
6.5 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, Capacitiva, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 230 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, até 256 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB Type-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G WCDMA (1/2/4/5/6/8/19), LTE FDD/TDD (1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9 x 160 x 74.3
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48MP (f/1.7, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) + 13MP (telephoto lens, f/2.4, 1/3.4", 1.0µm) + 8MP (ultra wide-angle lens, 1/3.2", 1.4µm) + 2MP (f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µm)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.0µm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, fone, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, capa protetora, fones estéreo de 3,5 mm, agulha SIM, ColorOS 6.1, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0.89 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.03 W/kg, fanless
peso
189 g, Suprimento de energia: 82 g
Preço
500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
03/2020
Oppo Reno2
SD 730G, Adreno 618
189 g256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
83 %
12/2019
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
86 %
10/2019
OnePlus 7T
SD 855+, Adreno 640
190 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
87 %
07/2019
Samsung Galaxy A80
SD 730, Adreno 618
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.7"2400x1080
85 %
07/2019
LG G8s ThinQ
SD 855, Adreno 640
181 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.2"2248x1080
Oppo Reno2
Oppo Reno2
Oppo Reno2
Oppo Reno2
Oppo Reno2

Size Comparison

165.2 mm 76.5 mm 9.3 mm 220 g160.94 mm 74.44 mm 8.13 mm 190 g160 mm 74.3 mm 9 mm 189 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g155.3 mm 76.6 mm 7.99 mm 181 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
618 (min: 532, max: 671) MBit/s ∼100%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
578 (min: 474, max: 617) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (min: 374, max: 485) MBit/s ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
428 (min: 360, max: 501) MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (min: 317, max: 341) MBit/s ∼54% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1368, n=534)
256 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
502 (min: 465, max: 517) MBit/s ∼100% +41%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (min: 238, max: 447) MBit/s ∼84% +19%
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
355 (min: 187, max: 387) MBit/s ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (min: 321, max: 333) MBit/s ∼65% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (min: 249, max: 327) MBit/s ∼56% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1544, n=534)
242 MBit/s ∼48% -32%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø616 (532-671)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø349 (187-387)
GNSS - Oppo Reno2
GNSS - Oppo Reno2
GNSS - Oppo Reno2
GNSS - Oppo Reno2
GNSS - Oppo Reno2
GNSS - Oppo Reno2
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
50 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
59.2 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
61.4 ∆E
61.4 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
45.7 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
41 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
75.2 ∆E
68.1 ∆E
50.6 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno2: 44.09 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 75.17 ∆E
ColorChecker
17 ∆E
7 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno2: 8.85 ∆E min: 2.76 - max: 18.5 ∆E
Oppo Reno2 - test chart
Oppo Reno2 - test chart (detail)
Oppo Reno2 - test chart (1 lux)
683
cd/m²
678
cd/m²
685
cd/m²
684
cd/m²
679
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
684
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
691
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 691 cd/m² Médio: 683.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.65 cd/m²
iluminação: 98 %
iluminação com acumulador: 679 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Oppo Reno2
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Samsung Galaxy A80
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
LG G8s ThinQ
P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Screen
-9%
6%
-9%
-2%
Brightness middle
679
625
-8%
693
2%
478
-30%
539
-21%
Brightness
683
607
-11%
703
3%
486
-29%
556
-19%
Brightness Distribution
98
89
-9%
96
-2%
96
-2%
88
-10%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.5
4.38
-25%
3.42
2%
2.97
15%
3.78
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.8
6.83
-0%
6.12
10%
10.18
-50%
6.95
-2%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.2
4.1
2%
3.3
21%
2.5
40%
2.2
48%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.251 98%
2.265 97%
2.031 108%
2.274 97%
CCT
6532 100%
7251 90%
6799 96%
6533 99%
6013 108%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 260.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 260.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 260.4 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).
Geekbench 5.1
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
812 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
920 Points ∼48% +13%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1906 Points ∼100% +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (812 - 920, n=2)
866 Points ∼45% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 4043, n=50)
1696 Points ∼89% +109%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1080 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1127 Points ∼50% +4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2256 Points ∼100% +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1080 - 1127, n=2)
1104 Points ∼49% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=48)
1758 Points ∼78% +63%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1762 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1727 Points ∼65% -2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2666 Points ∼100% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1727 - 1762, n=2)
1745 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (782 - 3531, n=62)
2007 Points ∼75% +14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
547 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points ∼73% -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
746 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (543 - 547, n=2)
545 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 1342, n=62)
574 Points ∼77% +5%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8317 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7881 Points ∼95%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7442 Points ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=346)
4786 Points ∼58%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6826 Points ∼60%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10274 Points ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13279, n=408)
4874 Points ∼43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3705 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2436 Points ∼66%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3406 Points ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=408)
1483 Points ∼40%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
7134 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points ∼83% +6%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points ∼95% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7177 Points ∼79% +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9125 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (7134 - 7558, n=3)
7414 Points ∼81% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=463)
5673 Points ∼62% -20%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
9145 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points ∼76% -1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points ∼87% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
8626 Points ∼73% -6%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11890 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (9052 - 9240, n=3)
9146 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=624)
6193 Points ∼52% -32%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2621 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points ∼79% +6%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2708 Points ∼78% +3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2794 Points ∼80% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2621 - 2768, n=3)
2714 Points ∼78% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=125)
2605 Points ∼75% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2155 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points ∼32% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points ∼100% +208%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2160 Points ∼33% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4236 Points ∼64% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2145 - 2155, n=3)
2151 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=125)
2800 Points ∼42% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points ∼41% +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points ∼100% +146%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2262 Points ∼41% +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3800 Points ∼69% +69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2244 - 2265, n=3)
2255 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6618, n=125)
2526 Points ∼46% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3162 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points ∼69% +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3160 Points ∼68% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3309 Points ∼71% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3162 - 3202, n=3)
3184 Points ∼69% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=469)
2110 Points ∼46% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2434 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points ∼30% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points ∼100% +228%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2438 Points ∼31% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5184 Points ∼65% +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2425 - 2492, n=3)
2450 Points ∼31% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9389, n=469)
1971 Points ∼25% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2565 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points ∼37% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points ∼100% +168%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2568 Points ∼37% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4604 Points ∼67% +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2561 - 2567, n=3)
2564 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8111, n=470)
1830 Points ∼27% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3112 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points ∼71% +3%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3025 Points ∼67% -3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3293 Points ∼73% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3112 - 3193, n=3)
3153 Points ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=499)
2021 Points ∼45% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3647 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points ∼32% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points ∼100% +213%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3635 Points ∼32% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6358 Points ∼56% +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3646 - 3648, n=3)
3647 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=499)
2616 Points ∼23% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3513 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points ∼41% +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points ∼100% +143%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3479 Points ∼41% -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5268 Points ∼62% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3513 - 3535, n=3)
3523 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=499)
2200 Points ∼26% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3088 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points ∼71% +3%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3215 Points ∼72% +4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3242 Points ∼72% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3088 - 3202, n=3)
3154 Points ∼70% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4987, n=549)
2003 Points ∼45% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2243 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points ∼31% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points ∼100% +219%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼31% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6040 Points ∼84% +169%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2237 - 2245, n=3)
2242 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=549)
1646 Points ∼23% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points ∼38% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points ∼100% +165%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼38% +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5068 Points ∼80% +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2388 - 2405, n=3)
2396 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7190, n=550)
1575 Points ∼25% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3075 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points ∼73% +4%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points ∼100% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3211 Points ∼73% +4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3505 Points ∼80% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3075 - 3228, n=3)
3165 Points ∼72% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=591)
1870 Points ∼43% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3504 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points ∼32% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points ∼100% +208%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3478 Points ∼32% -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6122 Points ∼57% +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3485 - 3504, n=3)
3496 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12394, n=590)
2146 Points ∼20% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3399 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼42% +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points ∼100% +139%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3415 Points ∼42% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5251 Points ∼65% +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3399 - 3425, n=3)
3416 Points ∼42% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9123, n=593)
1854 Points ∼23% -45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
14820 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
22054 Points ∼65% +49%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
33697 Points ∼100% +127%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
19389 Points ∼58% +31%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30972 Points ∼92% +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (14820 - 22054, n=2)
18437 Points ∼55% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=739)
14942 Points ∼44% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
50829 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51267 Points ∼44% +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
117304 Points ∼100% +131%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
51091 Points ∼44% +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97354 Points ∼83% +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (50829 - 51267, n=2)
51048 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=737)
24413 Points ∼21% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
33007 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39608 Points ∼52% +20%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
75613 Points ∼100% +129%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
37475 Points ∼50% +14%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65945 Points ∼87% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (33007 - 39608, n=2)
36308 Points ∼48% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=737)
19480 Points ∼26% -41%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼45% -1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼100% +118%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
84 fps ∼45% -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼46% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (84 - 85, n=2)
84.5 fps ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=751)
42.1 fps ∼23% -50%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
59 fps ∼98% -2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (60 - 60, n=2)
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=760)
29.8 fps ∼50% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼37% -2%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps ∼100% +167%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼38% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
50 fps ∼45% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (41 - 42, n=2)
41.5 fps ∼37% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=656)
24.6 fps ∼22% -41%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼64% +6%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼100% +64%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼61% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼86% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (36 - 38, n=2)
37 fps ∼63% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=664)
21.1 fps ∼36% -41%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼38% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼100% +163%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼38% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35 fps ∼44% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (30 - 30, n=2)
30 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=519)
19.9 fps ∼25% -34%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼47% +4%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps ∼100% +123%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼45% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼62% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (26 - 27, n=2)
26.5 fps ∼46% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=521)
18.3 fps ∼32% -30%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼37% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps ∼100% +170%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼37% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
14 fps ∼52% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (10 - 10, n=3)
10 fps ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=261)
10.7 fps ∼40% +7%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.7 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼56% +49%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps ∼100% +169%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6.8 fps ∼38% +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8.5 fps ∼47% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6.7 - 10, n=3)
7.8 fps ∼43% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=259)
7.62 fps ∼42% +14%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼39% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼100% +156%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼39% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼54% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (16 - 16, n=3)
16 fps ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=265)
16 fps ∼39% 0%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼38% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼100% +161%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼38% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼47% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (18 - 18, n=3)
18 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=264)
17.9 fps ∼38% -1%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼36% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼100% +176%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼36% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼47% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (17 - 17, n=2)
17 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=444)
13.5 fps ∼29% -21%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼37% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼100% +173%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼37% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
21 fps ∼51% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (15 - 15, n=2)
15 fps ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=448)
12 fps ∼29% -20%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
260154 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points ∼63% +2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
424308 Points ∼100% +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (260154 - 266417, n=2)
263286 Points ∼62% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 599843, n=72)
303587 Points ∼72% +17%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1190 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1237 Points ∼83% +4%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points ∼100% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
1117 Points ∼75% -6%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1171 Points ∼79% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1190 - 1237, n=2)
1214 Points ∼82% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=687)
792 Points ∼53% -33%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3858 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3878 Points ∼37% +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points ∼100% +175%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3855 Points ∼36% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8414 Points ∼79% +118%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3858 - 3878, n=2)
3868 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=687)
2309 Points ∼22% -40%
Memory (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3678 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4281 Points ∼88% +16%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3435 Points ∼71% -7%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4324 Points ∼89% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3678 - 4281, n=2)
3980 Points ∼82% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7945, n=687)
1707 Points ∼35% -54%
System (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6751 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6445 Points ∼72% -5%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6484 Points ∼72% -4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8718 Points ∼97% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6445 - 6751, n=2)
6598 Points ∼73% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=687)
3252 Points ∼36% -52%
Overall (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3268 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3392 Points ∼66% +4%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points ∼100% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3129 Points ∼61% -4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4389 Points ∼86% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3268 - 3392, n=2)
3330 Points ∼65% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=687)
1644 Points ∼32% -50%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.295 Points ∼100% +43%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
53.783 Points ∼82% +17%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.038 Points ∼71% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 46, n=2)
45.9 Points ∼70% 0%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
45.819 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
40.021 Points ∼61% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=151)
38.9 Points ∼60% -15%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.83 Points ∼100% +44%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
94.144 Points ∼78% +12%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
83.953 Points ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 84, n=2)
81.6 Points ∼68% -3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.228 Points ∼66% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77.376 Points ∼64% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=582)
45.1 Points ∼37% -46%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min ∼100% +58%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)
64.1 runs/min ∼93% +47%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
43.6 runs/min ∼63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (43.3 - 43.6, n=2)
43.5 runs/min ∼63% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=138)
42.4 runs/min ∼61% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chome 75)
38.9 runs/min ∼56% -11%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼100% +62%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points ∼93% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77 Points ∼72% +17%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points ∼72% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=2)
71.5 Points ∼67% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=214)
68.8 Points ∼64% +4%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
66 Points ∼62%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points ∼100% +46%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
23830 Points ∼94% +37%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
17345 Points ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16241 - 17345, n=2)
16793 Points ∼66% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
16358 Points ∼65% -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points ∼64% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=745)
7422 Points ∼29% -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=770)
10102 ms * ∼100% -231%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
3054.3 ms * ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
3027 ms * ∼30% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=2)
2912 ms * ∼29% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2769.8 ms * ∼27% +9%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
2036 ms * ∼20% +33%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021.4 ms * ∼20% +34%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo Reno2Xiaomi Mi Note 10OnePlus 7TSamsung Galaxy A80LG G8s ThinQAverage 256 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
109%
66%
-5%
11%
32%
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
53.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
46.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
53.5
0%
50.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=491)
-6%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
74.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
74.5
0%
68.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=491)
-8%
Random Write 4KB
22
118.9
440%
29.9
36%
21.6
-2%
29.6
35%
65.3 (22 - 109, n=2)
197%
29.5 (0.14 - 272, n=828)
34%
Random Read 4KB
144.24
106.2
-26%
170.1
18%
117.5
-19%
138
-4%
132 (119 - 144, n=2)
-8%
54.2 (1.59 - 265, n=828)
-62%
Sequential Write 256KB
201.78
243.6
21%
218.4
8%
190.4
-6%
182.4
-10%
203 (202 - 205, n=2)
1%
113 (2.99 - 750, n=828)
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB
469.31
480.5
2%
1406
200%
501.5
7%
791.1
69%
484 (469 - 499, n=2)
3%
311 (12.1 - 1781, n=828)
-34%
Arena of Valor
010203040506070Tooltip
; min: Ø60.8 (57-62)
; high HD: Ø60 (56-62)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.7 (23-32)
; Standard / low: Ø29.8 (27-31)
Carga Máxima
 33.4 °C33.3 °C31.9 °C 
 33.4 °C33.5 °C31.6 °C 
 32.9 °C33.5 °C31.2 °C 
Máximo: 33.5 °C
Médio: 32.7 °C
28.3 °C30 °C30.1 °C
28 °C30.6 °C30.9 °C
29.8 °C30.5 °C30.8 °C
Máximo: 30.9 °C
Médio: 29.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.133.12532.929.83127.126.64030.524.75033.832.86325.924.88023.632.210024.624.712520.428.916019.541.120018.747.625017.255.931516.56040014.461.250016.362.463015.363.280014.66810001473.4125014.972.3160014.27320001573.8250014.776.6315014.578.5400014.379.5500014.676.3630015.176.980001575.11000014.975.91250015.363.4160001650SPL2787.5N0.969.3median 15median 68Delta1.312.142.946.342.343.934.834.63939.140.842.634.43528.127.125.125.123.627.822.137.120.244.919.650.218.456.418.960.520.163.62065.217.566.316.17515.576.217.874.3167315.971.416.172.316.363.416.564.816.572.116.970.916.663.91764.516.55567.866.429.383.620.818.51.255.5median 17median 64.51.710.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Reno2Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Reno2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.34 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.25 / 1.36 Watt
Carga midlight 5.38 / 6.71 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-23%
-33%
3%
-38%
-11%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.7
-0%
0.9
-29%
0.6
14%
1.2
-71%
0.7 (0.7 - 0.7, n=2)
-0%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=842)
-26%
Idle Average *
1.25
1.8
-44%
1.4
-12%
1.2
4%
1.6
-28%
1.525 (1.25 - 1.8, n=2)
-22%
1.748 (0.6 - 6.2, n=841)
-40%
Idle Maximum *
1.36
2.2
-62%
2.9
-113%
1.4
-3%
2
-47%
1.78 (1.36 - 2.2, n=2)
-31%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=842)
-49%
Load Average *
5.38
5.2
3%
4.7
13%
5
7%
5
7%
5.29 (5.2 - 5.38, n=2)
2%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=836)
24%
Load Maximum *
6.71
7.5
-12%
8.3
-24%
7.1
-6%
10
-49%
7.11 (6.71 - 7.5, n=2)
-6%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=836)
10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
42h 13min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 45min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 05min
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Battery Runtime
51%
16%
-6%
-11%
Reader / Idle
2533
2134
-16%
2003
-21%
1796
-29%
1689
-33%
H.264
1125
1423
26%
967
-14%
902
-20%
753
-33%
WiFi v1.3
616
1127
83%
896
45%
713
16%
693
13%
Load
185
387
109%
283
53%
200
8%
203
10%

Pro

+ Câmera frontal tira boas fotos
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Nenhum entalhe ou furo perturbador
+ Muitos extras incluídos
+ Bom alto falante

Contra

- Duração da bateria medíocre
- Câmera principal decepcionante
- Tela com forte oscilação

Veredicto - Falta um polimento no Oppo Reno2

In review: Oppo Reno2. Test device courtesy of:
In review: Oppo Reno2. Test device courtesy of:

Nossos sentimentos sobre o Oppo Reno2 são confusos. Por um lado, possui uma aparência premium e o manuseio e o desempenho do hardware durante o uso diário são muito bons. Por outro lado, um olhar mais atento revela uma câmera bastante medíocre, que consiste basicamente em apenas quatro sensores individuais para diferentes cenários e uma duração relativamente curta, apesar da bateria grande. Além disso, os usuários com olhos sensíveis não poderão apreciar a tela por períodos prolongados.

Embora os compradores do Oppo Reno2 não estejam investindo em um telefone ruim, o sistema de câmeras quádruplas não deve ser o fator decisivo.

A câmera selfie Oppo Reno 2, que sobe automaticamente, é um recurso útil que concede aos usuários mais espaço na tela. Como resultado, nem um entalhe nem um furo interrompem o conteúdo exibido. Além disso, a câmera frontal tira fotos muito boas e até tira os holofotes da câmera principal. Assim, é aconselhável que compradores em potencial considerem suas expectativas pessoais para ver se estão alinhados com os pontos fortes e fracos do Reno2, a fim de evitar decepções no final.

Oppo Reno2 - 03/20/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
49 / 70 → 70%
Peso
89%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
27 / 64 → 43%
Desempenho da aplicação
64 / 86 → 75%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
64%
Médio
76%
81%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Oppo Reno2: Desempenho fraco de câmera
Mike Wobker, 2020-03-25 (Update: 2020-04- 3)