Breve Análise do Smartphone Oppo Reno2: Desempenho fraco de câmera

Name: Oppo Reno2
Brand: Oppo

Com câmera selfie motorizada. O Oppo Reno2 promete excelentes recursos para tirar fotos, longa duração da bateria e muito desempenho. Visualmente, o smartphone é definitivamente impressionante. Nossa análise mostrará quais outras qualidades o telefone pode trazer para a mesa.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/25/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Smartphone Touchscreen Android

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Oppo Reno2 (Reno Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 618

Memória

8 GB

Pantalha

6.50 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, Capacitiva, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 230 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, até 256 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB Type-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G WCDMA (1/2/4/5/6/8/19), LTE FDD/TDD (1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9 x 160 x 74.3

Bateria

4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48MP (f/1.7, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) + 13MP (telephoto lens, f/2.4, 1/3.4", 1.0µm) + 8MP (ultra wide-angle lens, 1/3.2", 1.4µm) + 2MP (f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µm)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.0µm

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, fone, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, capa protetora, fones estéreo de 3,5 mm, agulha SIM, ColorOS 6.1, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0.89 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.03 W/kg, fanless

peso

189 g, Suprimento de energia: 82 g

Preço

500 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Competing Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
81.2 %	03/2020	Oppo Reno2 SD 730G, Adreno 618	189 g	256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
83.3 %	12/2019	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 SD 730G, Adreno 618	208 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080
85.8 %	10/2019	OnePlus 7T SD 855+, Adreno 640	190 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
87.2 %	07/2019	Samsung Galaxy A80 SD 730, Adreno 618	220 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
85.7 %	07/2019	LG G8s ThinQ SD 855, Adreno 640	181 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.20"	2248x1080

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	502 (465^min - 517^max) MBit/s +41%
OnePlus 7T Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	422 (238^min - 447^max) MBit/s +19%
Oppo Reno2 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	355 (187^min - 387^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	327 (321^min - 333^max) MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	282 (249^min - 327^max) MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AX12
Oppo Reno2 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	618 (532^min - 671^max) MBit/s
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	578 (474^min - 617^max) MBit/s -6%
OnePlus 7T Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	430 (374^min - 485^max) MBit/s -30%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	428 (360^min - 501^max) MBit/s -31%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s -39%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	331 (317^min - 341^max) MBit/s -46%

Oppo Reno2; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø616 (532-671)

Oppo Reno2; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø349 (187-387)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


683 cd/m²	678 cd/m²	685 cd/m²
684 cd/m²	679 cd/m²	683 cd/m²
684 cd/m²	683 cd/m²	691 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 691 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 683.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.65 cd/m²
iluminação: 98 %
iluminação com acumulador: 679 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27

	Oppo Reno2 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47	OnePlus 7T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55	Samsung Galaxy A80 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70	LG G8s ThinQ P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.20
Screen		-9%	6%	-9%	-2%
Brightness middle	679	625 -8%	693 2%	478 -30%	539 -21%
Brightness	683	607 -11%	703 3%	486 -29%	556 -19%
Brightness Distribution	98	89 -9%	96 -2%	96 -2%	88 -10%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.5	4.38 -25%	3.42 2%	2.97 15%	3.78 -8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.8	6.83 -0%	6.12 10%	10.18 -50%	6.95 -2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.2	4.1 2%	3.3 21%	2.5 40%	2.2 48%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.251 ^98%	2.265 ^97%	2.031 ^108%	2.274 ^97%
CCT	6532 ^100%	7251 ^90%	6799 ^96%	6533 ^99%	6013 ^108%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

260.4 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 260.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 260.4 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	547 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	543 Points -1%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	746 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (523 - 551, n=6)	543 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)	918 Points +68%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	1762 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1727 Points -2%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2666 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1646 - 1786, n=6)	1729 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)	3009 Points +71%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	1080 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1127 Points +4%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2256 Points +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1080 - 1127, n=3)	1099 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=45, last 2 years)	7246 Points +571%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	812 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	920 Points +13%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1906 Points +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (812 - 920, n=3)	878 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=51, last 2 years)	7795 Points +860%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3705 Points
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2436 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3406 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G ()	2556 Points
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11388 Points
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	6826 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10274 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G ()	6987 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8317 Points
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	7881 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7442 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G ()	8411 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	9145 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	9052 Points -1%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10286 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	8626 Points -6%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	11890 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (8941 - 10200, n=7)	9376 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +65%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	7134 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	7558 Points +6%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8702 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	7177 Points +1%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9125 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (7134 - 8683, n=7)	7679 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +52%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	33007 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39608 Points +20%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	75613 Points +129%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	37475 Points +14%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	65945 Points +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (33007 - 39608, n=5)	37271 Points +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	50829 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	51267 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	117304 Points +131%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	51091 Points +1%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	97354 Points +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (50829 - 53548, n=5)	52404 Points +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	14820 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	22054 Points +49%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	33697 Points +127%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	19389 Points +31%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	30972 Points +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (14820 - 22054, n=5)	18710 Points +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3399 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3425 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8136 Points +139%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3415 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5251 Points +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3399 - 3594, n=7)	3490 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3504 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3498 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10781 Points +208%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3478 Points -1%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6122 Points +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3485 - 3678, n=7)	3561 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3075 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3191 Points +4%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4377 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3211 Points +4%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3505 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3075 - 3371, n=7)	3254 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3513 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3535 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8531 Points +143%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3479 Points -1%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5268 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3513 - 3704, n=7)	3598 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +166%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3647 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3646 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11433 Points +213%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3635 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6358 Points +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3646 - 3773, n=7)	3710 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +348%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3112 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3193 Points +3%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4517 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3025 Points -3%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3293 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3112 - 3390, n=7)	3238 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2388 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2394 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6319 Points +165%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2405 Points +1%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5068 Points +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2388 - 2489, n=7)	2434 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=103, last 2 years)	2770 Points +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2243 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2237 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7150 Points +219%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2244 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6040 Points +169%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2237 - 2310, n=7)	2270 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=103, last 2 years)	2769 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3088 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3171 Points +3%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4492 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3215 Points +4%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3242 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3088 - 3350, n=7)	3235 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=103, last 2 years)	3166 Points +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2565 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2561 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6875 Points +168%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2568 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4604 Points +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2561 - 2701, n=7)	2602 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=180, last 2 years)	6789 Points +165%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2434 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2425 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7977 Points +228%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2438 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5184 Points +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2425 - 2492, n=7)	2461 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=179, last 2 years)	9811 Points +303%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3162 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3188 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4635 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3160 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3309 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3058 - 3391, n=7)	3241 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=179, last 2 years)	4236 Points +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2244 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2265 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5530 Points +146%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2262 Points +1%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3800 Points +69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2244 - 2310, n=7)	2267 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=97, last 2 years)	2687 Points +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2155 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2153 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6640 Points +208%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2160 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4236 Points +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2143 - 2199, n=7)	2162 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=97, last 2 years)	2871 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2621 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2768 Points +6%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3489 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2708 Points +3%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2794 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2621 - 2775, n=7)	2727 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 3525, n=97, last 2 years)	2676 Points +2%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	60 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	59 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	59 fps -2%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (55 - 60, n=6)	58.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	85 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	84 fps -1%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	185 fps +118%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	84 fps -1%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	85 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (83 - 86, n=6)	84.5 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +191%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	36 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps +6%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	59 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	36 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	51 fps +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (25 - 39, n=6)	35.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +101%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	42 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps -2%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	112 fps +167%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	42 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	50 fps +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (41 - 42, n=6)	41.5 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +235%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	26 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps +4%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	58 fps +123%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	26 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16 - 29, n=6)	25.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +134%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	30 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	79 fps +163%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	30 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (30 - 30, n=6)	30 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +230%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	15 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps +173%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	15 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	21 fps +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (9.7 - 17, n=6)	14.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +189%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	17 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps +176%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	17 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (17 - 17, n=6)	17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +252%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	16 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps +156%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	16 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (10 - 17, n=7)	15.4 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=225, last 2 years)	44 fps +175%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	18 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps +161%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	18 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16 - 18, n=7)	17.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=225, last 2 years)	64.5 fps +258%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	10 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	27 fps +170%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	10 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	14 fps +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6.5 - 11, n=7)	9.79 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 118, n=225, last 2 years)	32.9 fps +229%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	6.7 fps
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps +49%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	18 fps +169%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	6.8 fps +1%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8.5 fps +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6.3 - 10, n=7)	7.09 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=225, last 2 years)	25.7 fps +284%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	260154 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	266417 Points +2%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	424308 Points +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (251673 - 275660, n=6)	266066 Points +2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3268 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3392 Points +4%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5124 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3129 Points -4%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4389 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3268 - 3512, n=6)	3391 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points +76%
System (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	6751 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6445 Points -5%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8988 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	6484 Points -4%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8718 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6305 - 6796, n=6)	6610 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points +43%
Memory (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3678 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	4281 Points +16%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4869 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3435 Points -7%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4324 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3678 - 4544, n=6)	4056 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points +70%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3858 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3878 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10611 Points +175%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3855 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8414 Points +118%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3840 - 3984, n=6)	3883 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points +266%
Web (sort by value)
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	1190 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1237 Points +4%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	1485 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	1117 Points -6%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1171 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1190 - 1365, n=6)	1286 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points +26%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +132%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	65.3 Points +43%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	53.8 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=6)	47.3 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	46.04 Points 0%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)	45.82 Points
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)	40.02 Points -13%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	120.8 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +24%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	94.1 Points +12%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)	84 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=6)	84 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	79.2 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)	77.4 Points -8%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +146%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)	69.1 runs/min +58%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)	64.1 runs/min +47%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)	43.6 runs/min
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	43.3 runs/min -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=6)	42.7 runs/min -2%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chome 75)	38.9 runs/min -11%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +102%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	107 Points +62%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	100 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)	77 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	77 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=6)	69.8 Points +6%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)	66 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)	33640 Points +94%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	25353 Points +46%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	23830 Points +37%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)	17345 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=6)	16793 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)	16358 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	16241 Points -6%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)	3054 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)	3027 ms * +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=6)	2898 ms * +5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	2770 ms * +9%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	2036 ms * +33%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	2021 ms * +34%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +48%

* ... smaller is better

	Oppo Reno2	Xiaomi Mi Note 10	OnePlus 7T	Samsung Galaxy A80	LG G8s ThinQ	Average 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		109%	66%	-5%	11%	32%	469%
Sequential Read 256KB	469.3	480.5 2%	1406 200%	502 7%	791 69%	484 ?(469 - 499, n=2) 3%	1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years) 221%
Sequential Write 256KB	201.8	243.6 21%	218.4 8%	190.4 -6%	182.4 -10%	203 ?(202 - 205, n=2) 1%	1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years) 451%
Random Read 4KB	144.2	106.2 -26%	170.1 18%	117.5 -19%	138 -4%	131.7 ?(119.2 - 144.2, n=2) -9%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years) 71%
Random Write 4KB	22	118.9 440%	29.9 36%	21.6 -2%	29.6 35%	65.3 ?(22 - 108.5, n=2) 197%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years) 1132%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	74.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)				67.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	74.5 ?() 0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	53.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)				46.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -13%	53.5 ?() 0%

Arena of Valor

Oppo Reno2; min: Ø60.8 (57-62)

Oppo Reno2; high HD: Ø60 (56-62)

Asphalt 9: Legends

Oppo Reno2; High Quality: Ø29.7 (23-32)

Oppo Reno2; Standard / low: Ø29.8 (27-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.4 °C	33.3 °C	31.9 °C
33.4 °C	33.5 °C	31.6 °C
32.9 °C	33.5 °C	31.2 °C

Máximo: 33.5 °C
Médio: 32.7 °C


28.3 °C	30 °C	30.1 °C
28 °C	30.6 °C	30.9 °C
29.8 °C	30.5 °C	30.8 °C

Máximo: 30.9 °C
Médio: 29.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 26.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oppo Reno2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.02 / 0.34 Watt
Ocioso	0.7 / 1.25 / 1.36 Watt
Carga	5.38 / 6.71 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Oppo Reno2 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh	OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A80 3700 mAh	LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-23%	-33%	3%	-38%	-25%	-18%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	0.7 -0%	0.9 -29%	0.6 14%	1.2 -71%	0.84 ?(0.49 - 1.55, n=6) -20%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Average *	1.25	1.8 -44%	1.4 -12%	1.2 4%	1.6 -28%	1.953 ?(0.96 - 4.91, n=6) -56%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -16%
Idle Maximum *	1.36	2.2 -62%	2.9 -113%	1.4 -3%	2 -47%	2.26 ?(1 - 5.02, n=6) -66%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -20%
Load Average *	5.38	5.2 3%	4.7 13%	5 7%	5 7%	4.51 ?(3.11 - 5.38, n=6) 16%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -3%
Load Maximum *	6.71	7.5 -12%	8.3 -24%	7.1 -6%	10 -49%	6.63 ?(5.23 - 7.5, n=6) 1%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -24%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		42h 13min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 45min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 05min

	Oppo Reno2 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh	OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A80 3700 mAh	LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh
Battery Runtime		51%	16%	-6%	-11%
Reader / Idle	2533	2134 -16%	2003 -21%	1796 -29%	1689 -33%
H.264	1125	1423 26%	967 -14%	902 -20%	753 -33%
WiFi v1.3	616	1127 83%	896 45%	713 16%	693 13%
Load	185	387 109%	283 53%	200 8%	203 10%

Pro

+ Câmera frontal tira boas fotos

+ Bom desempenho do sistema

+ Nenhum entalhe ou furo perturbador

+ Muitos extras incluídos

+ Bom alto falante

Contra

- Duração da bateria medíocre

- Câmera principal decepcionante

- Tela com forte oscilação

Veredicto - Falta um polimento no Oppo Reno2

In review: Oppo Reno2. Test device courtesy of:

Nossos sentimentos sobre o Oppo Reno2 são confusos. Por um lado, possui uma aparência premium e o manuseio e o desempenho do hardware durante o uso diário são muito bons. Por outro lado, um olhar mais atento revela uma câmera bastante medíocre, que consiste basicamente em apenas quatro sensores individuais para diferentes cenários e uma duração relativamente curta, apesar da bateria grande. Além disso, os usuários com olhos sensíveis não poderão apreciar a tela por períodos prolongados.

Embora os compradores do Oppo Reno2 não estejam investindo em um telefone ruim, o sistema de câmeras quádruplas não deve ser o fator decisivo.

A câmera selfie Oppo Reno 2, que sobe automaticamente, é um recurso útil que concede aos usuários mais espaço na tela. Como resultado, nem um entalhe nem um furo interrompem o conteúdo exibido. Além disso, a câmera frontal tira fotos muito boas e até tira os holofotes da câmera principal. Assim, é aconselhável que compradores em potencial considerem suas expectativas pessoais para ver se estão alinhados com os pontos fortes e fracos do Reno2, a fim de evitar decepções no final.

Oppo Reno2 - 2022-09-03 09/03/2022 v7
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

87%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 90%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

49 / 70 → 70%

Peso

89%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

88%

Desempenho do jogos

27 / 64 → 43%

Desempenho da aplicação

64 / 86 → 75%

Temperatura

94%

Ruído

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 84%

Camera

64%

Médio

76%

81%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Oppo Reno2: Desempenho fraco de câmera

Mike Wobker, 2020-03-25 (Update: 2020-04- 3)

Breve Análise do Smartphone Oppo Reno2: Desempenho fraco de câmera

Competing Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Arena of Valor

Asphalt 9: Legends

Oppo Reno2 audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Falta um polimento no Oppo Reno2

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare