Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Reforçado Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s: Uma raridade para os fanáticos dos smartphones para exteriores

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/09/2019

Blast from the past. Após dois anos de pesquisa e desenvolvimento, a Samsung finalmente lançou um sucessor para o seu smartphone de exteriores Galaxy XCover. O XCover 4s não vem apenas com uma carcaça robusta e protegido contra entrada de poeira e água, mas também oferece um recurso especial que quase nenhum outro celular para exteriores pode oferecer.

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Galaxy XCover Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 7884B
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, Tela táctil multi-touch capacitiva, IPS (PLS), Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C, OTG, MIracast
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (MHz): 850/900/1,800/1,900; UMTS (MHz): 850/900/1,900/2,100; LTE (MHz): 700/800/850/900/1,800/ 2,100/2,300/2,600, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.7 x 146.2 x 73.3
Bateria
10.78 Wh, 2800 mAh Lítio-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/1.7, Camera2 API: Limited
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: virtual, bateria, carregador, cabo de dados, guia de início rápido, One UI, 24 Meses Garantia, Head SAR: 0.905 W/Kg, body SAR: 1.307 W/Kg, LTE Cat.4 (150/50 Mbps), DRM Widevine: L1,, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
peso
172 g, Suprimento de energia: 37 g
Preço
259 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review

Size Comparison

167 mm 78 mm 13.8 mm 248 g166 mm 83 mm 13.2 mm 268 g162.5 mm 78.3 mm 13.3 mm 280 g152.5 mm 75.4 mm 12.5 mm 196 g146 mm 74.4 mm 12.6 mm 200 g146.2 mm 73.3 mm 9.7 mm 172 g146.2 mm 73.3 mm 9.7 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Ulefone Armor 6
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
344 (min: 219, max: 350) MBit/s ∼100% +26%
RugGear RG655
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
299 (min: 186, max: 330) MBit/s ∼87% +9%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 (min: 197, max: 295) MBit/s ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=434)
226 MBit/s ∼66% -18%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
63 (min: 56, max: 62) MBit/s ∼18% -77%
Cyrus CS24
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 55, max: 60) MBit/s ∼17% -78%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Mali-T720, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼14% -82%
CAT S31
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.6 MBit/s ∼12% -85%
Poptel P60
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 128 GB eMMC Flash
40.4 (min: 10, max: 55) MBit/s ∼12% -85%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Ulefone Armor 6
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
311 (min: 292, max: 329) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
RugGear RG655
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 (min: 254, max: 286) MBit/s ∼88% +4%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
263 (min: 227, max: 296) MBit/s ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=434)
216 MBit/s ∼69% -18%
Poptel P60
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 128 GB eMMC Flash
67.6 (min: 17, max: 90) MBit/s ∼22% -74%
Cyrus CS24
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.2 (min: 52, max: 57) MBit/s ∼17% -79%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.2 (min: 35, max: 54) MBit/s ∼16% -81%
CAT S31
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash
39.3 MBit/s ∼13% -85%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Mali-T720, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
37.9 MBit/s ∼12% -86%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
16 MP main camera
16 MP main camera
native 2x digital zoom
native 2x digital zoom
Live focus
Live focus
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Smartphone Review
486
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 533 cd/m² Médio: 513.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.67 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 525 cd/m²
Contraste: 1010:1 (Preto: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 7.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
96.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.53
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
IPS (PLS), 1280x720, 5
RugGear RG655
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Cubot King Kong 3
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Ulefone Armor 6
IPS LCD, 2246x1080, 6.2
Poptel P60
LCD IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
CAT S31
IPS, 1280x720, 4.7
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
-9%
6%
32%
14%
32%
-12%
Brightness middle
525
593
13%
365
-30%
418
-20%
401
-24%
784
49%
445
-15%
Brightness
513
579
13%
379
-26%
413
-19%
387
-25%
750
46%
437
-15%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
82
-9%
91
1%
92
2%
92
2%
88
-2%
Black Level *
0.52
0.46
12%
0.14
73%
0.2
62%
0.14
73%
0.45
13%
0.67
-29%
Contrast
1010
1289
28%
2607
158%
2090
107%
2864
184%
1742
72%
664
-34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6
8.9
-48%
8.03
-34%
4.5
25%
7.5
-25%
4.28
29%
6.5
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.9
19.5
-79%
16.34
-50%
6.8
38%
16.1
-48%
8.75
20%
10.6
3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.8
8.5
-9%
10.3
-32%
3.3
58%
9.6
-23%
6.1
22%
7.2
8%
Gamma
2.53 87%
2.89 76%
2.197 100%
2.24 98%
1.99 111%
2.49 88%
2.53 87%
CCT
8605 76%
7488 87%
9941 65%
7205 90%
8242 79%
7175 91%
8274 79%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9354 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.8 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3569 Points ∼76%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2965 Points ∼63% -17%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
3041 Points ∼65% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (2832 - 3569, n=3)
3224 Points ∼69% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=319)
4690 Points ∼100% +31%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4082 Points ∼87%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3300 Points ∼70% -19%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3948 Points ∼84% -3%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
3732 Points ∼79% -9%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
1135 Points ∼24% -72%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
1855 Points ∼39% -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (3590 - 4082, n=3)
3795 Points ∼81% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=378)
4703 Points ∼100% +15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1216 Points ∼86%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
789 Points ∼56% -35%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
878 Points ∼62% -28%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
789 Points ∼56% -35%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
437 Points ∼31% -64%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
629 Points ∼44% -48%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1168 - 1216, n=3)
1199 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=378)
1421 Points ∼100% +17%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5309 Points ∼76%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4942 Points ∼71% -7%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4960 Points ∼71% -7%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6950 Points ∼100% +31%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
4778 Points ∼69% -10%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
2300 Points ∼33% -57%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
3446 Points ∼50% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (5136 - 5309, n=3)
5250 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=370)
5253 Points ∼76% -1%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6316 Points ∼66%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6679 Points ∼70% +6%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6379 Points ∼67% +1%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9513 Points ∼100% +51%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
6036 Points ∼63% -4%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
3080 Points ∼32% -51%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
4508 Points ∼47% -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (6316 - 6902, n=3)
6680 Points ∼70% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=541)
5680 Points ∼60% -10%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2105 Points ∼78%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (2018 - 2105, n=3)
2058 Points ∼76% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=57)
2697 Points ∼100% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
477 Points ∼17%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (477 - 498, n=3)
485 Points ∼17% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=57)
2792 Points ∼100% +485%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
576 Points ∼23%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (576 - 598, n=3)
584 Points ∼23% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=57)
2534 Points ∼100% +340%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1554 Points ∼58%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
996 Points ∼37% -36%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1895 Points ∼71% +22%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2675 Points ∼100% +72%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1455 Points ∼54% -6%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
944 Points ∼35% -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1554 - 1628, n=3)
1599 Points ∼60% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4635, n=378)
1959 Points ∼73% +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
498 Points ∼28%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
431 Points ∼24% -13%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
415 Points ∼24% -17%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
881 Points ∼50% +77%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
382 Points ∼22% -23%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
87 Points ∼5% -83%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (439 - 498, n=3)
459 Points ∼26% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=378)
1765 Points ∼100% +254%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
588 Points ∼36%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
493 Points ∼30% -16%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
502 Points ∼31% -15%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1037 Points ∼63% +76%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
457 Points ∼28% -22%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
109 Points ∼7% -81%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (524 - 588, n=3)
546 Points ∼33% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6875, n=379)
1637 Points ∼100% +178%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1768 Points ∼64%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
993 Points ∼36% -44%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1882 Points ∼68% +6%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2765 Points ∼100% +56%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1476 Points ∼53% -17%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
1002 Points ∼36% -43%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1624 - 1768, n=3)
1674 Points ∼61% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=407)
1868 Points ∼68% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
826 Points ∼35%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
698 Points ∼30% -15%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
643 Points ∼27% -22%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1441 Points ∼61% +74%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
599 Points ∼26% -27%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
162 Points ∼7% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (646 - 826, n=3)
710 Points ∼30% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=407)
2344 Points ∼100% +184%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
937 Points ∼48%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
747 Points ∼38% -20%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
753 Points ∼38% -20%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1581 Points ∼80% +69%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
690 Points ∼35% -26%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
187 Points ∼9% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (746 - 937, n=3)
814 Points ∼41% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=407)
1969 Points ∼100% +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1747 Points ∼71%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
955 Points ∼39% -45%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1768 Points ∼71% +1%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2478 Points ∼100% +42%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1374 Points ∼55% -21%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
560 Points ∼23% -68%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
952 Points ∼38% -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1630 - 1747, n=3)
1686 Points ∼68% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4492, n=458)
1866 Points ∼75% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
555 Points ∼38%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
361 Points ∼25% -35%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
395 Points ∼27% -29%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
628 Points ∼43% +13%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
386 Points ∼27% -30%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
85 Points ∼6% -85%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (443 - 555, n=3)
481 Points ∼33% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=458)
1455 Points ∼100% +162%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
654 Points ∼47%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
419 Points ∼30% -36%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
477 Points ∼34% -27%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
733 Points ∼52% +12%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
439 Points ∼31% -33%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
107 Points ∼8% -84%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (526 - 654, n=3)
570 Points ∼41% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=459)
1400 Points ∼100% +114%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1756 Points ∼70%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
951 Points ∼38% -46%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1754 Points ∼70% 0%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2511 Points ∼100% +43%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1365 Points ∼54% -22%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
955 Points ∼38% -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1646 - 1756, n=3)
1692 Points ∼67% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=499)
1729 Points ∼69% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
766 Points ∼40%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
577 Points ∼30% -25%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
616 Points ∼33% -20%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
861 Points ∼45% +12%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
587 Points ∼31% -23%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
157 Points ∼8% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (582 - 766, n=3)
662 Points ∼35% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=498)
1894 Points ∼100% +147%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
876 Points ∼53%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
632 Points ∼39% -28%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
720 Points ∼44% -18%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1008 Points ∼62% +15%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
654 Points ∼40% -25%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
193 Points ∼12% -78%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (681 - 876, n=3)
765 Points ∼47% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8136, n=501)
1638 Points ∼100% +87%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
13610 Points ∼61%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
13221 Points ∼60% -3%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12566 Points ∼57% -8%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
22137 Points ∼100% +63%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
10234 Points ∼46% -25%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
6396 Points ∼29% -53%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
11459 Points ∼52% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (11287 - 13610, n=3)
12324 Points ∼56% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=660)
14068 Points ∼64% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
13711 Points ∼63%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10070 Points ∼46% -27%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11234 Points ∼52% -18%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18998 Points ∼88% +39%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1152 Points ∼5% -92%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
5042 Points ∼23% -63%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
3985 Points ∼18% -71%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (11335 - 13711, n=3)
12158 Points ∼56% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=658)
21690 Points ∼100% +58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
13688 Points ∼70%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10633 Points ∼54% -22%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11505 Points ∼59% -16%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19616 Points ∼100% +43%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
10956 Points ∼56% -20%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
5291 Points ∼27% -61%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
4661 Points ∼24% -66%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (11324 - 13688, n=3)
12192 Points ∼62% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=658)
17606 Points ∼90% +29%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
25 fps ∼66%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼45% -32%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
23 fps ∼61% -8%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
34 fps ∼90% +36%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
21 fps ∼56% -16%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
5.6 fps ∼15% -78%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
6.8 fps ∼18% -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (20 - 25, n=3)
21.7 fps ∼58% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=681)
37.6 fps ∼100% +50%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
41 fps ∼100%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
24 fps ∼59% -41%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
36 fps ∼88% -12%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
32 fps ∼78% -22%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
22 fps ∼54% -46%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
9.8 fps ∼24% -76%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
11 fps ∼27% -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (31 - 41, n=3)
34.3 fps ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=690)
27.9 fps ∼68% -32%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
13 fps ∼60%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9.1 fps ∼42% -30%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼51% -15%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18 fps ∼83% +38%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
10 fps ∼46% -23%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
1.9 fps ∼9% -85%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
2.6 fps ∼12% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (10 - 13, n=3)
11.3 fps ∼52% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=587)
21.6 fps ∼100% +66%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
27 fps ∼100%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
15 fps ∼56% -44%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
22 fps ∼81% -19%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
17 fps ∼63% -37%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
10 fps ∼37% -63%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
4.3 fps ∼16% -84%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
5.4 fps ∼20% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (20 - 27, n=3)
22.3 fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=596)
19.2 fps ∼71% -29%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
8.1 fps ∼46%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5.9 fps ∼33% -27%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
7.2 fps ∼41% -11%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼68% +48%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
6.6 fps ∼37% -19%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
1.6 fps ∼9% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (6.5 - 8.1, n=3)
7.03 fps ∼40% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=453)
17.7 fps ∼100% +119%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
19 fps ∼100%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼53% -47%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼84% -16%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11 fps ∼58% -42%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
6.3 fps ∼33% -67%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
3.9 fps ∼21% -79%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (14 - 19, n=3)
15.7 fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=455)
16.6 fps ∼87% -13%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6.4 fps ∼63%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.2 fps ∼41% -34%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3.9 fps ∼38% -39%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2.6 fps ∼25% -59%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1.4 fps ∼14% -78%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (4.8 - 6.4, n=3)
5.33 fps ∼52% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=171)
10.2 fps ∼100% +59%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1.8 fps ∼25%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.3 fps ∼18% -28%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps ∼21% -17%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4.3 fps ∼61% +139%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
2.2 fps ∼31% +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1.4 - 1.8, n=3)
1.533 fps ∼22% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=170)
7.08 fps ∼100% +293%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
10 fps ∼67%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.7 fps ∼45% -33%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6.9 fps ∼46% -31%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6.9 fps ∼46% -31%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
3.7 fps ∼25% -63%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (7.8 - 10, n=3)
8.57 fps ∼58% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=175)
14.9 fps ∼100% +49%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5 fps ∼30%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.6 fps ∼22% -28%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.1 fps ∼25% -18%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.6 fps ∼46% +52%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
3.8 fps ∼23% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (4 - 5, n=3)
4.33 fps ∼26% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=175)
16.7 fps ∼100% +234%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.3 fps ∼36%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.8 fps ∼23% -35%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.1 fps ∼34% -5%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7 fps ∼58% +63%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
3.8 fps ∼31% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (4.1 - 4.3, n=3)
4.2 fps ∼35% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=378)
12.1 fps ∼100% +181%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
12 fps ∼100%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.9 fps ∼41% -59%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
8.5 fps ∼71% -29%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7 fps ∼58% -42%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
3.8 fps ∼32% -68%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (8.6 - 12, n=3)
9.77 fps ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=382)
10.9 fps ∼91% -9%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
102121 Points ∼72%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
74180 Points ∼52% -27%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
91026 Points ∼64% -11%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
131861 Points ∼93% +29%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
83745 Points ∼59% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (89089 - 102121, n=3)
95558 Points ∼67% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=289)
141941 Points ∼100% +39%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
977 Points ∼87%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
733 Points ∼65% -25%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
753 Points ∼67% -23%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1128 Points ∼100% +15%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
10 Points ∼1% -99%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
661 Points ∼59% -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (977 - 1113, n=3)
1065 Points ∼94% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=625)
755 Points ∼67% -23%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1113 Points ∼55%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
744 Points ∼37% -33%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
952 Points ∼47% -14%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1486 Points ∼73% +34%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
866 Points ∼43% -22%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
256 Points ∼13% -77%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
253 Points ∼12% -77%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (879 - 1113, n=3)
962 Points ∼47% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=625)
2037 Points ∼100% +83%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1985 Points ∼87%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1065 Points ∼47% -46%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1252 Points ∼55% -37%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2276 Points ∼100% +15%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1136 Points ∼50% -43%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
328 Points ∼14% -83%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
1066 Points ∼47% -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1985 - 2008, n=3)
1995 Points ∼88% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=625)
1504 Points ∼66% -24%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3507 Points ∼74%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2434 Points ∼51% -31%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2952 Points ∼62% -16%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4736 Points ∼100% +35%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
2465 Points ∼52% -30%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
899 Points ∼19% -74%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
1396 Points ∼29% -60%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (3164 - 3507, n=3)
3348 Points ∼71% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=625)
2952 Points ∼62% -16%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1658 Points ∼80%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1090 Points ∼53% -34%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1276 Points ∼62% -23%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2062 Points ∼100% +24%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
384 Points ∼19% -77%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
1 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
706 Points ∼34% -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1576 - 1658, n=3)
1614 Points ∼78% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=625)
1480 Points ∼72% -11%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=100)
35.5 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)
22.457 Points ∼63%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (21.5 - 23.4, n=3)
22.4 Points ∼63% 0%
Cubot King Kong 3
15.994 Points ∼45% -29%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=89)
39.6 runs/min ∼100% +79%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
22.15 runs/min ∼56%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (20.7 - 22.2, n=3)
21.5 runs/min ∼54% -3%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=156)
67.2 Points ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
48 Points ∼71%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (45 - 48, n=3)
47 Points ∼70% -2%
RugGear RG655 (Chrome 75)
30 Points ∼45% -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Ulefone Armor 6 (Chrome 71)
8287 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (6921 - 7470, n=3)
7152 Points ∼86% +1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)
7065 Points ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=683)
6705 Points ∼81% -5%
Cubot King Kong 3 (Chrome 73)
4896 Points ∼59% -31%
Poptel P60 (Chrome 71)
3998 Points ∼48% -43%
RugGear RG655
3312 Points ∼40% -53%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)
3133 Points ∼38% -56%
CAT S31
2010 Points ∼24% -72%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
CAT S31
17827.9 ms * ∼100% -206%
Poptel P60 (Chrome 71)
13076.9 ms * ∼73% -124%
RugGear RG655
12363.9 ms * ∼69% -112%
Cubot King Kong 3 (Chrome 73)
11353 ms * ∼64% -95%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)
11130 ms * ∼62% -91%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=708)
10599 ms * ∼59% -82%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)
5826.7 ms * ∼33%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (5546 - 5917, n=3)
5763 ms * ∼32% +1%
Ulefone Armor 6 (Chrome 71)
4416.2 ms * ∼25% +24%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4sRugGear RG655Cubot King Kong 3Ulefone Armor 6Poptel P60CAT S31Samsung Galaxy XCover 4Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
-1%
39%
33%
-23%
-21%
-1%
8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
74.31
16%
60.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
72.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
59.5
-7%
55.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
50.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=140)
-22%
49.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=417)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
81.15
2%
75.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-5%
80.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
81.8
3%
68.97 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
68.9 (8.2 - 96.5, n=140)
-13%
67.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=417)
-15%
Random Write 4KB
10.38
11.68
13%
11.21
8%
19.87
91%
15.18
46%
14.81
43%
11.9
15%
18.4 (0.75 - 77.3, n=180)
77%
21.5 (0.14 - 250, n=733)
107%
Random Read 4KB
59.56
15.99
-73%
17.21
-71%
81.33
37%
69.7
17%
14.28
-76%
21.8
-63%
38.9 (3.59 - 117, n=180)
-35%
46.5 (1.59 - 196, n=733)
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB
85.4
121.31
42%
134.32
57%
188.45
121%
188.76
121%
62.13
-27%
73.6
-14%
94.7 (14.8 - 189, n=180)
11%
95.4 (2.99 - 590, n=733)
12%
Sequential Read 256KB
298.6
233.33
-22%
241.01
-19%
290.76
-3%
288.22
-3%
71.06
-76%
181.6
-39%
236 (25.8 - 452, n=180)
-21%
269 (12.1 - 1504, n=733)
-10%
PUBG Compare
010203040Tooltip
; Balanced: Ø29.7 (25-31)
; HD: Ø29.4 (17-31)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø28.4 (3-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.6 (27-31)
Carga Máxima
 30.5 °C30.2 °C29.3 °C 
 32.5 °C30.9 °C30.9 °C 
 33 °C31.2 °C30.9 °C 
Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 31 °C
26.8 °C29.7 °C30 °C
27.1 °C30.3 °C29.3 °C
27.8 °C30.2 °C30.4 °C
Máximo: 30.4 °C
Médio: 29.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  24.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.734.12537.130.23128.128.54027.626.95037.536.16322.931.78023.828.510021.325.512519.128.116018.444.920017.941.825017.746.931517.953.340014.658.550015.960.963015.265.480016.269.110001471.212501570.8160014.771.1200014.471.2250014.673315014.277.4400014.777.6500014.674.5630014.975.4800015.1771000015.172.21250014.8611600015.152.5SPL27.285.9N0.963.4median 15.1median 69.1Delta1.410.24038.928.132.924.627.523.42135.733.726.127.825.932.5254321.128.41737.216.140.413.546.516.253.714.954.714.759.314.263.914.364.913.366.114.166.513.971.413.679.914.479.914.278.814.776.114.174.814.380.114.578.214.868.115.358.915.452.226.488.30.867.5median 14.5median 64.90.812.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy XCover 4sUlefone Armor 6
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Ulefone Armor 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.08 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.62 / 1.66 Watt
Carga midlight 3.03 / 4.34 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
2800 mAh
RugGear RG655
4200 mAh
Cubot King Kong 3
6000 mAh
Ulefone Armor 6
5000 mAh
Poptel P60
5000 mAh
CAT S31
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
2800 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-7%
-46%
-34%
-16%
-16%
-14%
-8%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.81
-25%
0.9
-38%
0.9
-38%
0.81
-25%
0.73
-12%
0.56
14%
0.67 (0.65 - 0.7, n=3)
-3%
0.877 (0.2 - 3.4, n=769)
-35%
Idle Average *
1.62
1.85
-14%
1.9
-17%
2.04
-26%
2.14
-32%
2.21
-36%
1.57
3%
1.617 (1.6 - 1.63, n=3)
-0%
1.734 (0.6 - 6.2, n=768)
-7%
Idle Maximum *
1.66
1.87
-13%
2.4
-45%
2.09
-26%
2.16
-30%
2.25
-36%
1.68
-1%
1.777 (1.66 - 2, n=3)
-7%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=769)
-22%
Load Average *
3.03
2.58
15%
5.2
-72%
3.4
-12%
3.02
-0%
2.99
1%
4.6
-52%
3.73 (2.77 - 5.4, n=3)
-23%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=763)
-34%
Load Maximum *
4.34
4.23
3%
6.8
-57%
7.31
-68%
4.01
8%
4.12
5%
5.92
-36%
4.67 (3.66 - 6, n=3)
-8%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=763)
-36%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
19h 59min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 58min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 20min
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
2800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
2800 mAh
RugGear RG655
4200 mAh
Cubot King Kong 3
6000 mAh
Ulefone Armor 6
5000 mAh
Poptel P60
5000 mAh
CAT S31
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
10%
62%
105%
41%
96%
74%
Reader / Idle
1199
1388
16%
H.264
598
681
14%
1019
70%
WiFi v1.3
619
668
8%
945
53%
1267
105%
874
41%
1214
96%
1074
74%
Load
200
205
3%

Pro

+ Bateria substituível
+ Bem protegido
+ Prático
+ Atualizações por um longo tempo
+ Suporte para Knox
+ Conector para fones de 3,5 mm
+ NFC

Contra

- SoC lento
- Baixo em memória (RAM, ROM)
- Suporte LTE fraco
- Design 2017
- A duração da bateria é muito curta e o brilho da tela é muito baixo para um celular para exteriores
In Review: Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
In Review: Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

O novo XCover é um tapa na cara metafórico em todos os entusiastas de smartphones para exteriores. Isso pode soar duro, mas é a descrição mais precisa de nossas impressões. Apesar da promessa de suporte de longa data com atualizações (de segurança), esperaríamos muito mais depois de dois anos de pesquisa e desenvolvimento. É verdade que o XCover 4s oferece alguns recursos importantes para entusiastas de smartphones para exteriores, como bateria substituível pelo usuário, botões de hardware e uma carcaça robusta. No entanto, por outro lado, exige muitos compromissos que, em última análise, custam seu endosso, especialmente considerando o preço de rua recomendado da Samsung.

O design de 2017 do dispositivo permaneceu praticamente inalterado e os marcos são muito grandes para um smartphone moderno, até mesmo para a variedade reforçada para exteriores. Além disso, achamos que os problemas com a entrada de água que encontramos com o Galaxy XCover 4 ainda estejam presentes, dado que a carcaça permanece praticamente inalterada. A duração da bateria está abaixo da média para um smartphone de exteriores e não podemos deixar de nos perguntar por que a Samsung não aumentou a capacidade da bateria nos últimos dois anos. A mesma questão deve ser levantada em relação ao armazenamento interno. 32 GB de armazenamento eMMC lento são ruins para 2019, independentemente do que a concorrência tem a oferecer.

A Samsung é o “King of the Hill” no universo OLED, mas optou por um painel IPS com baixo contraste e pouca iluminação, com ângulos de visão ruins para o XCover 4s. O desempenho do sistema foi bastante fraco, principalmente devido ao comparativamente lento SoC Exynos combinado com a IU One da Samsung. Um SoC mais poderoso, como o Samsung Exynos 7885 1,4 GHz, e mais RAM teriam feito maravilhas neste caso. Também não podemos entender por que a Samsung não incluiu nenhum recurso de identificação biométrica em um smartphone de 2019 para exteriores, e porque o número de bandas LTE suportadas é muito limitado. Depois de tudo o dispositivo é claramente destinado ao mercado empresarial.

Vinho novo em garrafas antigas. O Galaxy XCover 4s não é ruim, mas esperávamos mais depois de dois anos.

Se você está no mercado por um smartphone para uso em exteriores e está procurando uma alternativa para o XCover 4s da Samsung, sugerimos dar uma olhada mais de perto no Ulefone Armor 6.

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s - 08/04/2019 v6(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
81%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
84%
Conectividade
41 / 60 → 68%
Peso
90%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
81%
Desempenho do jogos
34 / 63 → 53%
Desempenho da aplicação
55 / 70 → 79%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
60%
Médio
73%
81%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Reforçado Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s: Uma raridade para os fanáticos dos smartphones para exteriores
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-08- 9 (Update: 2019-08-13)