Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro – Telefone para exterior com bateria substituível pelo usuário

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/10/2020

Bateria substituível para profissionais. O Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro é um telefone robusto desenvolvido para ambientes difíceis. Além do design robusto da carcaça, ele tenta conquistar principalmente clientes em potencial com sua câmera. Em nossa análise, damos uma olhada mais de perto no smartphone para exteriores.

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Galaxy XCover Serie)
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.3 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB 
, 48 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, dedicado, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.94 x 159.9 x 76.7
Bateria
4050 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 25 MPix f/​1.7, phase detection AF, dual LED flash, video @1080p/​30FPS (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, fones, 24 Meses Garantia, FM radio, IP68-certified, MIL-STD-810G certified; LTE speed: 600 MB/s (download), 150 MB/s (upload); SAR value: 0.468 W/kg (head), 1.231 W/kg (body), fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
peso
218 g, Suprimento de energia: 49 g
Preço
499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78 %
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
218 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.3"2340x1080
74 %
08/2019
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2
172 g32 GB eMMC Flash5"1280x720
77 %
12/2019
CAT S52
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
210 g64 GB eMMC Flash5.65"1440x720
77 %
01/2020
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3
322 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
78 %
02/2019
Crosscall Trekker-X4
SD 660, Adreno 512
250 g64 GB eMMC Flash5.5"1920x1080
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro

Size Comparison

168.5 mm 81 mm 14.8 mm 322 g162.6 mm 82 mm 12.85 mm 250 g159.9 mm 76.7 mm 9.94 mm 218 g158.1 mm 76.6 mm 9.7 mm 210 g146.2 mm 73.3 mm 9.7 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
349 (min: 244, max: 361) MBit/s ∼100%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
322 (min: 301, max: 330) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB eMMC Flash
315 (min: 204, max: 334) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 (min: 197, max: 295) MBit/s ∼79% -21%
CAT S52
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 (min: 188, max: 274) MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=504)
244 MBit/s ∼70% -30%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
337 (min: 198, max: 368) MBit/s ∼100%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB eMMC Flash
302 (min: 173, max: 415) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
275 (min: 268, max: 279) MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
263 (min: 227, max: 296) MBit/s ∼78% -22%
CAT S52
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
256 (min: 138, max: 284) MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=504)
227 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø349 (244-361)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (198-368)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro – Overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro – Overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro – Turn
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro – Turn
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro – Bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
26.8 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
39 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
33 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
55.7 ∆E
52.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
56 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: 38.76 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 62.59 ∆E
ColorChecker
9.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: 6.93 ∆E min: 2.35 - max: 16.77 ∆E
Test chart – perfect lighting
Test chart – perfect lighting
Test chart – 1 lux
539
cd/m²
578
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 591 cd/m² Médio: 561.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.17 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 569 cd/m²
Contraste: 1355:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.14 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.256
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
IPS (PLS), 1280x720, 5
CAT S52
IPS, 1440x720, 5.65
Blackview BV9800 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Crosscall Trekker-X4
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-8%
47%
-9%
-18%
Brightness middle
569
525
-8%
521
-8%
511
-10%
374
-34%
Brightness
562
513
-9%
530
-6%
508
-10%
352
-37%
Brightness Distribution
91
90
-1%
91
0%
89
-2%
86
-5%
Black Level *
0.42
0.52
-24%
0.16
62%
0.29
31%
0.35
17%
Contrast
1355
1010
-25%
3256
140%
1762
30%
1069
-21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.14
6
2%
2.69
56%
8.1
-32%
7.46
-21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.92
10.9
-0%
5.07
54%
15.2
-39%
13.27
-22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.9
7.8
1%
1.8
77%
10.9
-38%
9.8
-24%
Gamma
2.256 98%
2.53 87%
2.243 98%
2.08 106%
2.152 102%
CCT
8696 75%
8605 76%
6622 98%
9859 66%
10554 62%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 30 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17159 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1055 Points ∼76%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1191 Points ∼86% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (663 - 1079, n=3)
932 Points ∼68% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3794, n=44)
1380 Points ∼100% +31%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1439 Points ∼82%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1259 Points ∼72% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1393 - 1522, n=3)
1451 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=52)
1756 Points ∼100% +22%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1063 Points ∼58%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1002 Points ∼55% -6%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1399 Points ∼76% +32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1063 - 1326, n=3)
1229 Points ∼67% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=64)
1831 Points ∼100% +72%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
345 Points ∼66%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
173 Points ∼33% -50%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
295 Points ∼57% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (345 - 349, n=3)
347 Points ∼66% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=64)
522 Points ∼100% +51%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5351 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5309 Points ∼66% -1%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5794 Points ∼72% +8%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8074 Points ∼100% +51%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6135 Points ∼76% +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5351 - 5925, n=3)
5642 Points ∼70% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=438)
5517 Points ∼68% +3%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5886 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6316 Points ∼55% +7%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7739 Points ∼68% +31%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11419 Points ∼100% +94%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6651 Points ∼58% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5886 - 6697, n=3)
6333 Points ∼55% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=601)
6014 Points ∼53% +2%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2061 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2105 Points ∼79% +2%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2585 Points ∼97% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2061 - 2161, n=3)
2119 Points ∼79% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=105)
2672 Points ∼100% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1436 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
477 Points ∼17% -67%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1095 Points ∼39% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1320 - 1438, n=3)
1398 Points ∼50% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=105)
2795 Points ∼100% +95%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1540 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
576 Points ∼23% -63%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1256 Points ∼50% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1442 - 1554, n=3)
1512 Points ∼60% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=105)
2532 Points ∼100% +64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2058 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1554 Points ∼54% -24%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1210 Points ∼42% -41%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2883 Points ∼100% +40%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2724 Points ∼94% +32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2058 - 2311, n=3)
2157 Points ∼75% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=444)
2043 Points ∼71% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1527 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
498 Points ∼26% -67%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
488 Points ∼26% -68%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1093 Points ∼58% -28%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1266 Points ∼67% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1267 - 1530, n=3)
1441 Points ∼77% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9345, n=444)
1882 Points ∼100% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1620 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
588 Points ∼34% -64%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
563 Points ∼32% -65%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1268 Points ∼73% -22%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1437 Points ∼82% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1390 - 1654, n=3)
1555 Points ∼89% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 7982, n=445)
1748 Points ∼100% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1768 Points ∼58%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1212 Points ∼40%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3029 Points ∼100%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2748 Points ∼91%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2275 - 2336, n=2)
2306 Points ∼76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5209, n=473)
1954 Points ∼65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
826 Points ∼33%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
816 Points ∼33%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1606 Points ∼64%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2001 Points ∼80%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1634 - 1993, n=2)
1814 Points ∼73%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=473)
2498 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
937 Points ∼44%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
880 Points ∼41%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1793 Points ∼84%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2130 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1743 - 2060, n=2)
1902 Points ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=473)
2105 Points ∼99%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2080 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1747 Points ∼61% -16%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1173 Points ∼41% -44%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2869 Points ∼100% +38%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2731 Points ∼95% +31%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2080 - 2255, n=3)
2184 Points ∼76% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4909, n=524)
1946 Points ∼68% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1450 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
555 Points ∼35% -62%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
439 Points ∼28% -70%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1104 Points ∼70% -24%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1185 Points ∼75% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1203 - 1473, n=3)
1375 Points ∼88% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=524)
1571 Points ∼100% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1555 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
654 Points ∼42% -58%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
510 Points ∼33% -67%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1279 Points ∼82% -18%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1356 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1342 - 1592, n=3)
1496 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7012, n=525)
1504 Points ∼97% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1756 Points ∼61%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1172 Points ∼41%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2856 Points ∼100%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2751 Points ∼96%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2225 - 2286, n=2)
2256 Points ∼79%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=565)
1814 Points ∼64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
766 Points ∼37%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
736 Points ∼36%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1278 Points ∼62%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1914 Points ∼93%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1468 - 2027, n=2)
1748 Points ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11488, n=564)
2053 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
876 Points ∼43%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
802 Points ∼39%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1457 Points ∼71%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2053 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1595 - 2068, n=2)
1832 Points ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8866, n=567)
1774 Points ∼86%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
13610 Points ∼67%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
17243 Points ∼85%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
17113 Points ∼84%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
19890 Points ∼98%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (20118 - 20393, n=2)
20256 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=715)
14596 Points ∼72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
13711 Points ∼47%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
12064 Points ∼42%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20321 Points ∼70%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
29055 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (15971 - 25086, n=2)
20529 Points ∼71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=713)
23210 Points ∼80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
13688 Points ∼52%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
12927 Points ∼49%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19508 Points ∼74%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26356 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (16738 - 23866, n=2)
20302 Points ∼77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=713)
18684 Points ∼71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
25 fps ∼50% -37%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
21 fps ∼42% -47%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
42 fps ∼84% +5%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
50 fps ∼100% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (40 - 46, n=3)
42.3 fps ∼85% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=734)
40.4 fps ∼81% +1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
37 fps ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
41 fps ∼84% +11%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
29 fps ∼59% -22%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
38 fps ∼78% +3%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
49 fps ∼100% +32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (37 - 40, n=3)
38 fps ∼78% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=743)
29.1 fps ∼59% -21%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
13 fps ∼55% -35%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
11 fps ∼47% -45%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
23 fps ∼98% +15%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
22 fps ∼94% +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (20 - 24, n=3)
21.3 fps ∼91% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=638)
23.5 fps ∼100% +18%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
22 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
27 fps ∼100% +23%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
19 fps ∼70% -14%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
21 fps ∼78% -5%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼85% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (17 - 23, n=3)
20.7 fps ∼77% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=647)
20.3 fps ∼75% -8%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16 fps ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
8.1 fps ∼43% -49%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
6.6 fps ∼35% -59%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
14 fps ∼74% -12%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼79% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (14 - 16, n=3)
15 fps ∼79% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=503)
19 fps ∼100% +19%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
19 fps ∼100% +36%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
12 fps ∼63% -14%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼63% -14%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼79% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (14 - 14, n=3)
14 fps ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=505)
17.6 fps ∼93% +26%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.6 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6.4 fps ∼62% +14%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.7 fps ∼46% -16%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4.6 fps ∼45% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5.5 - 8.3, n=3)
6.47 fps ∼63% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=238)
10.3 fps ∼100% +84%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1.8 fps ∼24% -49%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼20% -57%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2.9 fps ∼39% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (3.5 - 3.6, n=3)
3.53 fps ∼48% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=236)
7.41 fps ∼100% +112%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.4 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
10 fps ∼65% +6%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.4 fps ∼48% -21%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.7 fps ∼50% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.8 - 9.4, n=3)
9.1 fps ∼59% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=242)
15.3 fps ∼100% +63%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5 fps ∼29% -50%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
3.9 fps ∼22% -61%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8.5 fps ∼49% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (9.8 - 10, n=3)
9.93 fps ∼57% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=242)
17.4 fps ∼100% +74%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.3 fps ∼33% -57%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2.8 fps ∼22% -72%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
8.1 fps ∼63% -19%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9 fps ∼70% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (9.6 - 10, n=3)
9.87 fps ∼77% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=428)
12.9 fps ∼100% +29%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.2 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
12 fps ∼100% +30%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.9 fps ∼41% -47%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.4 fps ∼62% -20%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9.4 fps ∼78% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.6 - 9.2, n=3)
8.87 fps ∼74% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=432)
11.5 fps ∼96% +25%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1202 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
977 Points ∼81% -19%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
887 Points ∼74% -26%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1045 Points ∼87% -13%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1095 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (10 - 1202, n=3)
746 Points ∼62% -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=668)
778 Points ∼65% -35%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2150 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1113 Points ∼50% -48%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
866 Points ∼39% -60%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1712 Points ∼76% -20%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2247 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2127 - 2168, n=3)
2148 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=668)
2206 Points ∼98% +3%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1717 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1985 Points ∼71% +16%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1141 Points ∼41% -34%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2559 Points ∼91% +49%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2799 Points ∼100% +63%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1605 - 2122, n=3)
1815 Points ∼65% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=668)
1619 Points ∼58% -6%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4029 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3507 Points ∼69% -13%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2390 Points ∼47% -41%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3915 Points ∼78% -3%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5048 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (4029 - 4978, n=3)
4582 Points ∼91% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=668)
3145 Points ∼62% -22%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2057 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1658 Points ∼68% -19%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1203 Points ∼50% -42%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2057 Points ∼85% 0%
Crosscall Trekker-X4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2428 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (634 - 2191, n=3)
1627 Points ∼67% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=668)
1580 Points ∼65% -23%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
42816 Points ∼92%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
17134 Points ∼37% -60%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
33632 Points ∼72% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (33717 - 42816, n=3)
38336 Points ∼82% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 110361, n=53)
46667 Points ∼100% +9%
MEM (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
38461 Points ∼76%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
32868 Points ∼65% -15%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
37952 Points ∼75% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (38461 - 44128, n=3)
41998 Points ∼83% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (16319 - 100390, n=53)
50474 Points ∼100% +31%
GPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36903 Points ∼41%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
6340 Points ∼7% -83%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
37197 Points ∼42% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (34020 - 36903, n=3)
35915 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 214615, n=53)
89526 Points ∼100% +143%
CPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
57481 Points ∼61%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
46624 Points ∼49% -19%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
74929 Points ∼79% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (57481 - 63005, n=3)
61027 Points ∼64% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40620 - 178616, n=53)
94932 Points ∼100% +65%
Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
175661 Points ∼62%
CAT S52
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
102966 Points ∼37% -41%
Blackview BV9800 Pro
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
183710 Points ∼65% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (174870 - 181295, n=3)
177275 Points ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 599843, n=53)
281636 Points ∼100% +60%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=133)
37.1 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (27.7 - 28.7, n=3)
28 Points ∼75% +1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)
27.671 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)
22.457 Points ∼61% -19%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Crosscall Trekker-X4 (Chrome 71)
55.524 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (51 - 51.9, n=3)
51.4 Points ∼93% +1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)
50.992 Points ∼92%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)
47.513 Points ∼86% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=564)
43.6 Points ∼79% -14%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)
37.945 Points ∼68% -26%
CAT S52 (Chrome 79)
26.218 Points ∼47% -49%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=121)
40.6 runs/min ∼100% +40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (29 - 30.5, n=3)
29.5 runs/min ∼73% +2%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chome 80)
29 runs/min ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
22.15 runs/min ∼55% -24%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=196)
67.6 Points ∼100% +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (46 - 57, n=3)
51 Points ∼75% +11%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
48 Points ∼71% +4%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)
47 Points ∼70% +2%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)
46 Points ∼68%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Crosscall Trekker-X4 (Chrome 71)
10573 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7442 - 10194, n=3)
9107 Points ∼86% +22%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)
8520 Points ∼81% +14%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)
7442 Points ∼70%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=725)
7128 Points ∼67% -4%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)
7065 Points ∼67% -5%
CAT S52 (Chrome 79)
4494 Points ∼43% -40%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
CAT S52 (Chrome 79)
10848.6 ms * ∼100% -75%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=750)
10258 ms * ∼95% -65%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)
6212.4 ms * ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)
5826.7 ms * ∼54% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (4332 - 6212, n=3)
4973 ms * ∼46% +20%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)
4845.2 ms * ∼45% +22%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 (Chrome 71)
3954.2 ms * ∼36% +36%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy XCover ProSamsung Galaxy XCover 4sCAT S52Blackview BV9800 ProCrosscall Trekker-X4Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-35%
-21%
-22%
-24%
-12%
-39%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
61.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
61.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
3%
59.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
52.4 (33.3 - 63.3, n=7)
-12%
50.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=470)
-16%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
72.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
82.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
77.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
7%
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15%
71.2 (36.8 - 85.4, n=7)
-2%
68.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=470)
-6%
Random Write 4KB
100.5
10.38
-90%
21.3
-79%
20.74
-79%
14.3
-86%
55 (13.6 - 133, n=11)
-45%
26.1 (0.14 - 259, n=802)
-74%
Random Read 4KB
108.6
59.56
-45%
76.6
-29%
86.68
-20%
71.5
-34%
105 (57.7 - 157, n=11)
-3%
51.3 (1.59 - 226, n=802)
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB
181.1
85.4
-53%
195.4
8%
185.88
3%
194.7
8%
174 (135 - 206, n=11)
-4%
107 (2.99 - 729, n=802)
-41%
Sequential Read 256KB
507.6
298.6
-41%
286.2
-44%
286.45
-44%
272.4
-46%
471 (272 - 687, n=11)
-7%
295 (12.1 - 1781, n=802)
-42%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø60 (59-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø59.9 (53-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.0.5a: Ø28.2 (20-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.0.5a: Ø29.5 (24-31)
Carga Máxima
 40.4 °C36.1 °C34.5 °C 
 40.2 °C36.1 °C35.4 °C 
 38.4 °C36 °C34.5 °C 
Máximo: 40.4 °C
Médio: 36.8 °C
31 °C35.4 °C39.5 °C
31.6 °C35.5 °C38.8 °C
31.1 °C35.8 °C37.4 °C
Máximo: 39.5 °C
Médio: 35.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.240.22543.741.33134.833.34037.637.15039.538.66336.635.18029.130.110028.426.912530.531.716024.735.820022.84125021.947.531521.554.640019.962.850020.765.763019.268.580018.773.110002277.9125018.277160017.877200017.779250017.876315017.677.3400017.871.3500017.771630018.171.5800018.371.41000018.768.81250019591600019.460.1SPL70.966.13187.1N21.8191.667median 19median 68.8Delta210.142.939.742.342.834.834.93935.640.838.934.433.428.127.425.130.223.630.722.136.620.241.319.645.118.450.818.95620.159.62062.417.565.216.173.415.57417.8721672.415.973.116.17416.366.716.566.616.569.416.97016.665.71754.516.548.468.866.667.866.429.382.922.519.420.818.51.252.3median 17median 65.21.711hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy XCover ProCAT S52
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

CAT S52 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.8 / 2.3 Watt
Carga midlight 5.4 / 6.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
4050 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
2800 mAh
CAT S52
3100 mAh
Blackview BV9800 Pro
6580 mAh
Crosscall Trekker-X4
4400 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
29%
5%
4%
16%
2%
11%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.65
28%
1
-11%
0.87
3%
0.7
22%
0.933 (0.9 - 1, n=3)
-4%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=818)
2%
Idle Average *
1.8
1.62
10%
1.9
-6%
1.91
-6%
1.4
22%
1.8 (1.7 - 1.9, n=3)
-0%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=817)
3%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
1.66
28%
2.7
-17%
2.03
12%
2.2
4%
2.17 (1.8 - 2.4, n=3)
6%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=818)
12%
Load Average *
5.4
3.03
44%
3.6
33%
4.4
19%
4.1
24%
5.2 (5 - 5.4, n=3)
4%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=812)
24%
Load Maximum *
6.9
4.34
37%
5.2
25%
7.49
-9%
6.4
7%
6.6 (6.3 - 6.9, n=3)
4%
5.99 (1.2 - 14.2, n=812)
13%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
20h 59min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 11min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 28min
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
4050 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
2800 mAh
CAT S52
3100 mAh
Blackview BV9800 Pro
6580 mAh
Crosscall Trekker-X4
4400 mAh
Battery Runtime
-18%
-13%
104%
15%
Reader / Idle
1259
1199
-5%
H.264
802
598
-25%
WiFi v1.3
731
619
-15%
637
-13%
1492
104%
839
15%
Load
268
200
-25%

Pro

+ Resistente à agua e à poeira
+ Botões livremente atribuíveis
+ Bateria substituível
+ Armazenamento veloz
+ Software moderno
+ Design discreto
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ GPS preciso
+ Boas câmeras

Contra

- Flutuações do desempenho sob uso intenso
- Problemas de nitidez da câmera em nosso teste de laboratório
- Tonalidade azul da tela
- Qualidade de chamada medíocre
- alto-falante com agudos demais

Veredicto – Telefone ara exteriores com muitas fortalezas

In review: Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Test device courtesy of:
In review: Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Test device courtesy of:

O Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro é um moderno smartphone para exteriores. Não se limita apenas ao exterior, pois os componenytes internos também incluem recursos que normalmente não são encontrados em outros dispositivos reforçados: Há uma porta USB tipo C, armazenamento rápido UFS 2.0 e um sensor de digitais, que foi integrado no botão home por conveniência.

Enquanto isso, o XCover Pro oferece estabilidade suficiente para ambientes difíceis e software com uma interface de usuário moderna. Também estamos contentes de ver qualidades um tanto antiquadas, como uma bateria substituível e o retorno de um conector de 3,5 mm para fones de ouvido.

Embora custe 499 Euros (~US$ 556), o smartphone não pode competir com os smartphones tradicionais em termos de configuração de memória ou desempenho do sistema, parte do orçamento foi gasto em maior estabilidade. O Galaxy XCover também oferece muitos recursos úteis de negócios, como botões livremente atribuíveis, um exterior sutil e suporte para estações docking. Isso também i torna uma opção interessante para usuários domésticos que se aventuram em terrenos acidentados com mais frequência do que a maioria, por exemplo, durante o exercício.

O moderno smartphone para exteriores Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro com uma bateria substituível é um conceito de sucesso.

Obviamente, a duração da bateria poderia ser melhor e a qualidade das chamadas e do alto-falante não é ótima. No entanto, o XCover Pro ainda recebe nossa recomendação devido ao Wi-Fi rápido, bom GPS e câmeras decentes.

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro - 03/02/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
89%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
95%
Conectividade
47 / 70 → 67%
Peso
88%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
17 / 64 → 27%
Desempenho da aplicação
53 / 86 → 62%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
50 / 90 → 56%
Camera
59%
Médio
72%
78%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro – Telefone para exterior com bateria substituível pelo usuário
Florian Schmitt, 2020-03-10 (Update: 2020-03-25)