Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 8 Sirocco
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 576 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.3
| Nokia 8 Sirocco P-OLED, 2560x1440, 5.50 | Sony Xperia XZ2 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.70 | Motorola Moto Z2 Force OLED, 2560x1440, 5.50 | Samsung Galaxy S9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.80 | Huawei P10 Plus LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.50 | Nokia 8 IPS, 2560x1440, 5.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 34% | 1% | 31% | 27% | -16% | |
| Brightness middle | 576 | 630 9% | 511 -11% | 529 -8% | 568 -1% | 735 28% |
| Brightness | 597 | 632 6% | 526 -12% | 527 -12% | 562 -6% | 707 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 96 13% | 88 4% | 96 13% | 92 8% | 92 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.79 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5 | 1.5 70% | 4.3 14% | 1.4 72% | 2.4 52% | 6.7 -34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8 | 4.3 46% | 9.6 -20% | 4 50% | 3.8 52% | 12.9 -61% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 2.1 61% | 3.7 31% | 1.6 70% | 2.5 54% | 8.3 -54% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.11 104% | 2.16 102% | 2.37 93% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7730 84% | 6513 100% | 7075 92% | 6358 102% | 6779 96% | 8906 73% |
| Contrast | 1432 | 1321 | 930 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Nokia 8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (150208 - 185487, n=17) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (201881 - 217442, n=8) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (52.9 - 80.4, n=19) | |
| Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (3086 - 14300, n=20) | |
| Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (2425 - 4813, n=19) | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (57 - 204, n=17) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 8 Sirocco | Sony Xperia XZ2 | Motorola Moto Z2 Force | Samsung Galaxy S9 | Huawei P10 Plus | Nokia 8 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | 63% | 1% | 144% | -11% | 135% | 429% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 738 | 679 -8% | 696 -6% | 815 10% | 733 -1% | 680 -8% | 760 ? 3% | 1505 ? 104% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 211.6 | 198.7 -6% | 213.6 1% | 206.9 -2% | 182.6 -14% | 199.1 -6% | 297 ? 40% | 1112 ? 426% |
| Random Read 4KB | 140.7 | 149.4 6% | 148.8 6% | 131 -7% | 173.1 23% | 145.7 4% | 152.9 ? 9% | 247 ? 76% |
| Random Write 4KB | 22.4 | 17 -24% | 78.6 251% | 23.07 3% | 149.8 569% | 14.57 -35% | 131.6 ? 488% | 271 ? 1110% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 34.25 ? | 77.4 ? | 79.2 ? | 54 ? | 76.8 ? | 76 ? | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 30.12 ? | 54.7 ? | 67.2 ? | 33.61 ? | 51.7 ? | 59.6 ? |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 60 fps | ||
| high HD | 60 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
| minimal | 60 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 8 Sirocco audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.14 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.78 / 1.53 / 1.57 Watt |
| Carga |
3.49 / 6.96 Watt |
    
| |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco 3260 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Motorola Moto Z2 Force 2730 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Nokia 8 3090 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -29% | 29% | 19% | -66% | -33% | -26% | -18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.78 | 0.72 8% | 0.52 33% | 0.65 17% | 1.03 -32% | 0.86 -10% | 0.852 ? -9% | 0.897 ? -15% |
| Idle Average * | 1.53 | 2.21 -44% | 0.84 45% | 0.81 47% | 2.61 -71% | 2.13 -39% | 2.02 ? -32% | 1.452 ? 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.57 | 2.22 -41% | 0.85 46% | 0.92 41% | 2.83 -80% | 2.16 -38% | 2.12 ? -35% | 1.629 ? -4% |
| Load Average * | 3.49 | 4.6 -32% | 2.71 22% | 4.76 -36% | 7.03 -101% | 4.65 -33% | 4.69 ? -34% | 5.55 ? -59% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.96 | 9.34 -34% | 7.2 -3% | 5.16 26% | 10.08 -45% | 9.99 -44% | 8.46 ? -22% | 8.31 ? -19% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 8 Sirocco 3260 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Motorola Moto Z2 Force 2730 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Nokia 8 3090 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -16% | 1% | -31% | -7% | -9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1603 | 1402 -13% | 1630 2% | 1182 -26% | 1655 3% | 1506 -6% |
| H.264 | 725 | 722 0% | 811 12% | 609 -16% | 756 4% | 733 1% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 693 | 679 -2% | 531 -23% | 474 -32% | 760 10% | 650 -6% |
| Load | 317 | 159 -50% | 354 12% | 164 -48% | 174 -45% | 237 -25% |
Pro
Contra
O Nokia 8 Sirocco definitivamente é um smartphone para individualistas; a Nokia cumpriu sua promessa, dando a esse telefone um nome bastante particular. O telefone tem todas as características de um telefone celular de gama alta atual: Durações de bateria longas, alto desempenho, uma tela de alta resolução, jogos a 60 FPS, uma câmera dupla decente e LTE rápido. A carcaça parece muito elegante, é extremamente estável e também resistente à água e poeira.
Mas o Sirocco não é perfeito: A Nokia teria que encontrar uma solução melhor para o efeito de cor estranha que a tela causa no conteúdo branco, lidar com o estranho comportamento do GPS no Google Maps e equipar o dispositivo com uma câmera frontal melhor. Os alto-falantes podem ser muito fortes, mas o som não está balanceado e não há certificação de áudio de alta resolução. O desenvolvimento de calor é bastante forte sob uso intenso e o desempenho do SoC não é constante e cai significativamente após um curto período de tempo sob uso intenso.
O Nokia 8 Sirocco não é perfeito, mas é um bom smartphone de gama alta para os individualistas.
Apesar de suas fraquezas, o Nokia 8 Sirocco tem estilo e também pode oferecer muitas vantagens, incluindo um generoso conjunto de acessórios e Android puro com garantia de atualização. Portanto, podemos recomendar o Nokia 8 Sirocco a todos que estiverem prontos para aceitar as deficiências mencionadas acima, em troca de algo diferente dos modelos comuns e medíocres.
Nokia 8 Sirocco
-
09/03/2022 v7
Florian Wimmer
Pricecompare
