Breve Análise do Subportátil HP EliteBook 725 G3

Name: HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA
Brand: HP

Mais gama média, menos elite. A HP demonstra sua lealdade para com a AMD utilizando uma APU AMD em seu novo subportátil, o EliteBook 725 G3. Infelizmente, o preço de quase 1,000 Euros (~$1133) não corresponde ao desempenho deste aparelho. O nosso modelo de teste nos ofereceu uma duração curta de bateria, uma ventoinha barulhenta e uma tela escura com baixo contraste e ângulos de visão pobres.

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 09/01/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Business Carrizo Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA (EliteBook 700 Serie)

Processador

AMD Pro A10-8700B 4 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Carrizo

Placa gráfica

AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Análises do: 720 MHz, Single-Channel, 16.300.2311.0 (Crimson 16.7.3)

Memória

4 GB

, DDR3-1600, Single Channel, dois slots de memória (um slot está ocupado)

Pantalha

12.50 polegadas 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 125 PPI, LG Philips, TN LED, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

AMD KernCZ

Disco rígido

Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630, 500 GB

, 7200 rpm, 420 GB livre

Placa de Som

Conexant CX20724 @ AMD K15.6 - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Audio combo, Card Reader: SD, 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Sensores: Acelerômetro, TPM 1.2

Funcionamento em rede

Broadcom BCM5762 NetXtreme PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.9 x 311 x 218.9

Bateria

44 Wh, 0 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 7 Professional (64 Bit) + Windows 10 Pro (64 Bit)

Camera

Webcam: HD Webcam

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Windows 10 DVD, DVD de controladores, Cyberlink PowerDVD 12, Cyberlink YouCam, Foxit PhantomPDF, MS Office (avaliação), MS Security Essentials, 36 Meses Garantia

peso

1.26 kg, Suprimento de energia: 306 g

Preço

1135 Euro

Links

HP página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP EliteBook 725 G2 Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Dell Latitude 12 E5270 HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP EliteBook 820 G3	73.7 MB/s +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE	62.1 MB/s +15%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA	54.2 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 12 E5270	216.4 MB/s +165%
HP EliteBook 820 G3	86.9 MB/s +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE	84.9 MB/s +4%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA	81.8 MB/s

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	570 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	397 MBit/s


260 cd/m²	267 cd/m²	248 cd/m²
239 cd/m²	241 cd/m²	234 cd/m²
221 cd/m²	224 cd/m²	226 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 267 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 240 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 239 cd/m²
Contraste: 446:1 (Preto: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 9.52 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
71.12% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.03% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
48.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
47.15% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA TN LED, 1366x768	HP EliteBook 725 G2 TN-Panel, 1366x768	Dell Latitude 12 E5270 TN, 1366x768	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE IPS, 1366x768	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 IPS, 1920x1080	HP EliteBook 820 G3 TN LED, 1366x768	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz IPS, 2304x1440
Display		-14%	-17%	2%	46%	-17%	39%
Display P3 Coverage	47.15	40.56 -14%	39.06 -17%	48.19 2%	72.3 53%	38.9 -17%	66.8 42%
sRGB Coverage	71	61 -14%	58.7 -17%	72.6 2%	93.8 32%	58.5 -18%	95.4 34%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	48.71	41.92 -14%	40.36 -17%	49.79 2%	73.8 52%	40.2 -17%	68 40%
Response Times			5%	1%		-19%	-5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	50 ?(27, 23)		45.2 ?(22.4, 22.8) 10%	42.8 ?(18.8, 24) 14%		58 ?(24.8, 33.2) -16%	41.2 ?(15.6, 25.6) 18%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(20, 4)		24 ?(6.8, 17.2) -0%	27.2 ?(12.4, 14.8) -13%		29.2 ?(12, 17.2) -22%	30.4 ?(6.8, 23.6) -27%
PWM Frequency			1000 ?(90)	220 ?(90)
Screen		-30%	-11%	42%	63%	-8%	51%
Brightness middle	241	188 -22%	161 -33%	262 9%	367.1 52%	244 1%	387 61%
Brightness	240	186 -22%	152 -37%	251 5%	341 42%	240 0%	358 49%
Brightness Distribution	83	91 10%	90 8%	88 6%	85 2%	84 1%	88 6%
Black Level *	0.54	0.86 -59%	0.29 46%	0.26 52%	0.3 44%	0.6 -11%	0.47 13%
Contrast	446	219 -51%	555 24%	1008 126%	1224 174%	407 -9%	823 85%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.04	12.31 -53%	10.31 -28%	3.55 56%		9 -12%	1.6 80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	13.9		18.58 -34%	5.85 58%		15.73 -13%	4 71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.52	12.56 -32%	11.3 -19%	3.36 65%		9.48 -0%	1 89%
Gamma	2.42 ^91%	1.86 ^118%	2.57 ^86%	2.39 ^92%		2.44 ^90%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	11362 ^57%	12047 ^54%	13574 ^48%	5985 ^109%		11116 ^58%	6680 ^97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	45.03	38.6 -14%	37.32 -17%	45.9 2%		37.18 -17%	61.6 37%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	71.12		58.82 -17%			58.63 -18%	82.2 16%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-22% / -26%	-8% / -10%	15% / 28%	55% / 56%	-15% / -11%	28% / 41%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 27 ms rise
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

4662

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

5907

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

2200

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

18.32 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

2.29 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.82 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

22.48 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

192 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

70 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points +86%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	123 Points +76%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	121 Points +73%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	112 Points +60%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	91 Points +30%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	90 Points +29%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	74 Points +6%
Acer Extensa 2510-34Z4 Intel Core i3-4030U	70 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	70 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD A10 Pro-7350B	55 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel Core i7-6500U	325 Points +69%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	311 Points +62%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	305 Points +59%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	289 Points +51%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	218 Points +14%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	192 Points
Acer Extensa 2510-34Z4 Intel Core i3-4030U	187 Points -3%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	187 Points -3%
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD A10 Pro-7350B	151 Points -21%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	10432 Points +77%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	9728 Points +65%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	7355 Points +25%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	6309 Points +7%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	5907 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD A10 Pro-7350B	4951 Points -16%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	4625 Points +110%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	4408 Points +100%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	3353 Points +52%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	2777 Points +26%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	2200 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD A10 Pro-7350B	1907 Points -13%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	199.1 Points +79%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	188 Points +69%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	143 Points +29%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	130.7 Points +18%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	123.2 Points +11%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	111.2 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	66.4 Points -40%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	3814 ms *
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	2262 ms * +41%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	1976 ms * +48%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	1770 ms * +54%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	1663 ms * +56%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	1283 ms * +66%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	1203 ms * +68%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	1196 ms * +69%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	30812 Points +90%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	29020 Points +79%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	26857 Points +66%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	21739 Points +34%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	18464 Points +14%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	17378 Points +7%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	16222 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	9042 Points -44%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score		2331 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2706 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		2710 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3691 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8 | PCMark 7

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 820 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3400 Points +26%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	3291 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	3262 Points +21%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Pro A10-8700B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	2706 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	2550 Points -6%
HP EliteBook 725 G2 Radeon R6 (Kaveri), A10 Pro-7350B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	2291 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 820 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4581 Points +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	4335 Points +17%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	4273 Points +16%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Pro A10-8700B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	3691 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	3550 Points -4%
HP EliteBook 725 G2 Radeon R6 (Kaveri), A10 Pro-7350B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	3227 Points -13%

PCMark 7 - Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	3777 Points +62%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	3263 Points +40%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Pro A10-8700B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	2331 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G2 Radeon R6 (Kaveri), A10 Pro-7350B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	1869 Points -20%

	HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	HP EliteBook 725 G2 Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	HP EliteBook 820 G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-11%	-26%	18%	13315%	9582%
Read Seq	125.3	116.8 -7%	113.8 -9%	107.9 -14%	1255 902%	754 502%
Write Seq	124.3	115.6 -7%	108.5 -13%	110.2 -11%	1240 898%	638 413%
Read 512	40.95	39.14 -4%	24.9 -39%	36.26 -11%	1131 2662%	616 1404%
Write 512	57.6	49.61 -14%	51.9 -10%	77.1 34%	811 1308%	678 1077%
Read 4k	0.495	0.453 -8%	0.398 -20%	0.497 0%	51 10203%	14.6 2849%
Write 4k	1.13	0.947 -16%	0.654 -42%	3.136 178%	134.1 11767%	20.5 1714%
Read 4k QD32	1.129	1.019 -10%	0.798 -29%	1.155 2%	549 48527%	464 40998%
Write 4k QD32	1.133	0.931 -18%	0.636 -44%	0.766 -32%	343.9 30253%	315 27702%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630

Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 63.9 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 134.5 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Média: 105.2 MB/s

Tempo de Acesso: 16.6 ms

Índice de Explosão: 164 MB/s

3DMark 06 Standard Score		5207 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		1424 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		34816 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		3524 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		690 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		300 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	1767 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	1432 Points -19%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	1389 Points -21%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	1280 Points -28%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1212 Points -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1210 Points -32%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	1186 Points -33%
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri), AMD A10 Pro-7350B	987 Points -44%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	6928 Points +47%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	6309 Points +34%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	6131 Points +30%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	6078 Points +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	5978 Points +27%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	4717 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri), AMD A10 Pro-7350B	3989 Points -15%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	983 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	769 Points -22%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	815 Points -17%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	755 Points -23%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	735 Points -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	727 Points -26%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	675 Points -31%
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri), AMD A10 Pro-7350B	555 Points -44%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
Tomb Raider (2013)	49.5	25.2	18.5
BioShock Infinite (2013)	42.7	24.1	19.4
Battlefield 4 (2013)	21.7	14.4	8.4
Far Cry Primal (2016)	10	7
The Division (2016)	12.3	7.5
Hitman 2016 (2016)	6.1	3.9
Need for Speed 2016 (2016)	11.1	10.4
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)	6	2.3

Barulho

Ocioso		30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB
HDD		30.9 dB
Carga		38.2 / 38.4 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.9 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.8 °C	42.8 °C	38.7 °C
36 °C	38.6 °C	38.3 °C
33.5 °C	34 °C	37.4 °C

Máximo: 42.8 °C
Médio: 37.5 °C


40.5 °C	54.3 °C	42 °C
40.5 °C	39.7 °C	36.3 °C
38.7 °C	35.5 °C	33.8 °C

Máximo: 54.3 °C
Médio: 40.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 44.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.3 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.3 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.65 / 0.71 Watt
Ocioso	5.4 / 7.5 / 13 Watt
Carga	41.2 / 44.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Pro A10-8700B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo)	HP EliteBook 725 G2 A10 Pro-7350B, Radeon R6 (Kaveri)	Dell Latitude 12 E5270 6300U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 6500U, HD Graphics 520	HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515
Power Consumption		9%	27%	30%	19%	32%	52%
Idle Minimum *	5.4	7 -30%	3.9 28%	3.6 33%	2.7 50%	3.5 35%	2.7 50%
Idle Average *	7.5	8.6 -15%	6 20%	5.9 21%	7.7 -3%	5.4 28%	2.7 64%
Idle Maximum *	13	9.9 24%	6.6 49%	6.6 49%	11 15%	6.2 52%	7.2 45%
Load Average *	41.2	24.4 41%	28.9 30%	28.5 31%	34.8 16%	27.3 34%	22 47%
Load Maximum *	44.7	32.5 27%	41.7 7%	36.8 18%	36.6 18%	39.5 12%	20.5 54%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		9h 13min
WiFi Websurfing (IE 11)		4h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		4h 18min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 23min

	HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA 44 Wh	HP EliteBook 725 G2 46 Wh	Dell Latitude 12 E5270 47 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 46 Wh	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 52 Wh	HP EliteBook 820 G3 44 Wh	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 41.4 Wh
Battery Runtime		-2%	43%	57%	105%	62%	118%
Reader / Idle	553	456 -18%	772 40%	795 44%	1134 105%	826 49%
H.264	258	205 -21%	353 37%	386 50%		495 92%	512 98%
WiFi v1.3	281		398 42%	396 41%		373 33%	501 78%
Load	83	110 33%	128 54%	160 93%		144 73%	231 178%
WiFi		258			402

Pro

+ Painel mate

+ Carcaça sólida com bom acabamento

+ Bons dispositivos de entrada

+ Muitas opções de atualização

+ 3 anos de garantia

+ Preparado para LTE

Contra

- Tela TN escura com baixo contraste e ângulos de visão pobres

- Ventoinha barulhenta

- Curta duração da bateria

In review: HP EliteBook 725 G3. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

O Hewlett Packard EliteBook 725 G3 é um subportátil de 12,5-polegadas. A APU AMD deste modelo oferece suficiente desempenho para tarefas cotidianas. O portátil tem uma boa carcaça e oferece uma boa conectividade. O teclado também é bastante bom. O portátil tem uma opção de incluir um modem LTE e as antenas necessárias e slot SIM já estão disponíveis. A HP oferece uma garantia de 3-anos.

Existem muitos aspectos desde modelo de teste que podem ser criticados. O portátil funciona silenciosamente apenas quando está no modo inativo. Se a ventoinha começa a funcionar, o aparelho se tornará barulhento, devido a um perturbante zumbido que é emitido. Isto, combinado com o preço do aparelho, é suficiente para desqualifica-lo de ser um portátil empresarial viável. O EliteBook 725 G2 tinha uma escotilha de manutenção que podia ser aberta sem ferramentas. Seu sucessor, o EliteBook 725 G3, possui uma placa inferior que utiliza parafusos. Para ser justos, temos de admitir que o aparelho pode ser desmontado facilmente com uma chave de fenda, mas mesmo assim, este seria um passo para trás.

A duração da bateria não é muito boa. O portátil de 12,5-polegadas deveria oferecer durações mais longas e é ultrapassado pelo EliteBook 820 G3 e o Lenovo ThinkPad X260. A tela é pobre para o preço que o comprador está pagando. Ela tem brilho baixo, contraste e ângulos de visão pobres e uma resolução HD.

O EliteBook 725 G3 terá dificuldade sobrevivendo no catálogo empresarial da HP. Nem o hardware, nem o preço fazem com que este portátil seja algo especial.

Para resumir, não podemos encontrar um motivo válido para recomendar o EliteBook 725 G3. Inclusive se o preço fosse rebaixado, a duração da bateria simplesmente não corresponde aos padrões modernos para esta classe. Além disso, os compradores sempre tem a opção de um EliteBook 820 G3 (T9X40ET), que é mais barato que o nosso modelo de teste e tem um processador Core i5-6200U. Os recursos restantes deste modelo são similares a aqueles do nosso modelo de teste, o 725 G3. Com um preço de 920 Euros (~$1043), o modelo irmão é 80 Euros (~$91) mais barato que o nosso modelo de teste, o 725 G3.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês.

HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA - 2016-08-11 08/11/2016 v5.1^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

91 / 98 → 93%

Teclado

87%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

57 / 80 → 71%

Peso

72 / 35-78 → 86%

Bateria

77%

Pantalha

77%

Desempenho do jogos

50 / 68 → 73%

Desempenho da aplicação

60 / 87 → 69%

Temperatura

86 / 91 → 94%

Ruído

76%

Audio

59 / 91 → 65%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Médio

71%

82%

Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Subportátil HP EliteBook 725 G3

Sascha Mölck, 2016-09- 1 (Update: 2016-09- 9)