Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 755 G5 (Ryzen 7 2700U, Vega 10)

AMD for Business. Os EliteBooks da HP oferecem um design atraente, tecnologia AMD e muitos recursos de segurança. No entanto, esses portáteis de negócios frequentemente se destacavam com alto consumo de energia, baixa qualidade da tela e uma duração de bateria medíocre. Avaliamos em nossa análise do HP EliteBook 755 G5 se algo mudou com esta nova geração.
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA (EliteBook 700 Serie)
Processador
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 4 x 2.2 - 3.8 GHz, Zen
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR4-2400, single channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE074E, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
AMD CZ FCH
Disco rígido
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 512 GB 
, 365 GB livre
Placa de Som
AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio combinado, 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, LTE
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.3 x 370 x 252
Bateria
56 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p, 0,9 MP, 1280 x 720
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
1.78 kg, Suprimento de energia: 315 g
Preço
1599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

HP EliteBook 755 G5
HP EliteBook 755 G5
HP EliteBook 755 G5
HP EliteBook 755 G5
HP EliteBook 755 G5

Size Comparison

383.6 mm 257.7 mm 19.4 mm 1.8 kg370 mm 252 mm 18.3 mm 1.8 kg333 mm 229 mm 21 mm 1.7 kg331 mm 227 mm 19 mm 1.4 kg326 mm 234 mm 17.9 mm 1.5 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left side: Kensington Lock, USB 3.0 Type A, smartcard reader
Left side: Kensington Lock, USB 3.0 Type A, smartcard reader
Right side: SIM card slot, audio combo port, USB 3.0 Type A, HDMI, Gigabit LAN, docking port, USB Type-C, power
Right side: SIM card slot, audio combo port, USB 3.0 Type A, HDMI, Gigabit LAN, docking port, USB Type-C, power
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Office
  (280 - 1332, n=6, last 2 years)
810 MBit/s +44%
HP EliteBook 755 G4
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
648 MBit/s +15%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
593 MBit/s +5%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
564 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
529 MBit/s -6%
Dell Latitude 5490
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
524 MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Office
  (348 - 1690, n=6, last 2 years)
852 MBit/s +140%
Dell Latitude 5490
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
653 MBit/s +84%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
620 MBit/s +75%
HP EliteBook 755 G4
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
504 MBit/s +42%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
409 MBit/s +15%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
355 MBit/s
387
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE074E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 456 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 409.6 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 456 cd/m²
Contraste: 735:1 (Preto: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 9.15 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
BOE074E, , 1920x1080, 15.60
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
AUO383D, , 1920x1080, 14.00
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
NV140FHM-N46, , 1920x1080, 14.00
Dell Latitude 5490
AUO133D, , 1920x1080, 14.00
HP EliteBook 755 G4
Chi Mei, CMN15C3, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
-6%
-38%
-43%
-12%
Display P3 Coverage
66.9
61.3
-8%
39.69
-41%
36.42
-46%
56.3
-16%
sRGB Coverage
90.2
87.6
-3%
59.2
-34%
54.6
-39%
84.2
-7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.1
62.3
-6%
41
-38%
37.62
-43%
57.7
-13%
Response Times
16%
-38%
19%
-22%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39 ?(20, 19)
35 ?(17, 18)
10%
44 ?(26, 18)
-13%
30.4 ?(16.8, 13.6)
22%
45 ?(27, 18)
-15%
Response Time Black / White *
32 ?(18, 14)
25 ?(15, 10)
22%
34 ?(18.8, 15.2)
-6%
27.2 ?(16.4, 10.8)
15%
18 ?(14, 4)
44%
PWM Frequency
21000 ?(90)
990
-95%
1000 ?(90)
-95%
Screen
30%
1%
-14%
-34%
Brightness middle
456
421
-8%
288.3
-37%
200.6
-56%
333
-27%
Brightness
410
398
-3%
281
-31%
204
-50%
306
-25%
Brightness Distribution
84
86
2%
86
2%
87
4%
82
-2%
Black Level *
0.62
0.27
56%
0.21
66%
0.16
74%
0.89
-44%
Contrast
735
1559
112%
1373
87%
1254
71%
374
-49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.09
4.08
42%
6.16
13%
8.36
-18%
11.69
-65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
12.64
7.48
41%
18.99
-50%
25.63
-103%
20.57
-63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
9.15
2.92
68%
6.3
31%
7.7
16%
13.7
-50%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.32 95%
2.517 87%
2.773 79%
2.29 96%
CCT
7195 90%
7043 92%
6886 94%
6397 102%
15194 43%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
57
-3%
37.67
-36%
34.5
-42%
54
-8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
87
-3%
58.9
-35%
54.2
-40%
84
-7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.51
4.6
Total Average (Program / Settings)
13% / 21%
-25% / -14%
-13% / -16%
-23% / -28%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 21000 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 21000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 21000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Office
  (82.6 - 284, n=118, last 2 years)
215 Points +60%
Dell Latitude 5490
Intel Core i7-8650U
178 Points +33%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
143 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
  (134 - 150, n=12)
141.9 Points +6%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
134 Points
HP EliteBook 755 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
75 Points -44%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Office
  (160.8 - 2642, n=120, last 2 years)
1380 Points +120%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
716 Points +14%
Dell Latitude 5490
Intel Core i7-8650U
661 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
  (546 - 719, n=12)
640 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
630 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
626 Points
HP EliteBook 755 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
222 Points -65%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
134 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
626 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
39.53 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Office
  (2304 - 4830, n=12, last 2 years)
4261 Points +34%
Dell Latitude 5490
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4065 Points +28%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3672 Points +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (3155 - 3640, n=7)
3308 Points +4%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3186 Points
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3155 Points -1%
HP EliteBook 755 G4
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
1579 Points -50%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 5490
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5200 Points +16%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4495 Points
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4403 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (2438 - 4774, n=7)
4215 Points -6%
HP EliteBook 755 G4
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3765 Points -16%
Average of class Office
  (1854 - 5610, n=12, last 2 years)
3746 Points -17%
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Office
  (2325 - 7157, n=105, last 2 years)
5312 Points +72%
Dell Latitude 5490
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4066 Points +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3771 Points +22%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3087 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (2584 - 3402, n=7)
3004 Points -3%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2712 Points -12%
HP EliteBook 755 G4
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2332 Points -24%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3186 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4495 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
3087 pontos
Ajuda
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Dell Latitude 5490
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Average Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-11%
21%
-7%
16%
Write 4K
119.9
119.5
0%
105.8
-12%
98.7
-18%
114 ?(79.1 - 148.7, n=12)
-5%
Read 4K
30.39
31.9
5%
40.79
34%
39.46
30%
35.6 ?(16.1 - 49.7, n=12)
17%
Write Seq
558
351.1
-37%
1204
116%
564
1%
684 ?(250 - 1342, n=12)
23%
Read Seq
1689
1665
-1%
1065
-37%
764
-55%
1612 ?(276 - 2353, n=12)
-5%
Write 4K Q32T1
265.9
268.4
1%
219.2
-18%
443.3
67%
401 ?(266 - 518, n=12)
51%
Read 4K Q32T1
329.5
333.1
1%
304.3
-8%
268.8
-18%
427 ?(258 - 773, n=12)
30%
Write Seq Q32T1
710
351.8
-50%
1267
78%
796
12%
830 ?(459 - 2969, n=12)
17%
Read Seq Q32T1
2984
2705
-9%
3303
11%
875
-71%
2950 ?(1783 - 3228, n=12)
-1%
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Sequential Read: 1701 MB/s
Sequential Write: 523 MB/s
512K Read: 859 MB/s
512K Write: 550 MB/s
4K Read: 20.23 MB/s
4K Write: 63.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 306 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 220.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Office
  (1474 - 12230, n=115, last 2 years)
5878 Points +115%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (2688 - 4165, n=17)
3483 Points +28%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
2885 Points +6%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
2728 Points
HP EliteBook 755 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD PRO A12-9800B
1820 Points -33%
Dell Latitude 5490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1761 Points -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1704 Points -38%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Office
  (5681 - 58068, n=98, last 2 years)
23871 Points +126%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (9364 - 20784, n=16)
14708 Points +39%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
10604 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
10578 Points
Dell Latitude 5490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
9663 Points -9%
HP EliteBook 755 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD PRO A12-9800B
5278 Points -50%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Office
  (712 - 8815, n=117, last 2 years)
4072 Points +138%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (1567 - 2999, n=17)
2224 Points +30%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
1738 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
1713 Points
Dell Latitude 5490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1141 Points -33%
HP EliteBook 755 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD PRO A12-9800B
962 Points -44%
3DMark 11 Performance
2792 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8819 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1554 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (8 - 58.4, n=14)
19.2 fps +37%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
14.2 fps +1%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
14 fps
Dell Latitude 5490
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
10 fps -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
8 fps -43%
HP EliteBook 755 G4
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7.8 fps -44%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (65.7 - 123.7, n=14)
96.3 fps +12%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
86 fps
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
84.7 fps -2%
Dell Latitude 5490
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
64 fps -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
55 fps -36%
HP EliteBook 755 G4
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
46.2 fps -46%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1024x768 Lowest Preset
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (33 - 45.9, n=6)
38.6 fps +17%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
33.5 fps +2%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
33 fps
HP EliteBook 755 G4
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
20.6 fps -38%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
12 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (8.3 - 16.4, n=6)
12 fps 0%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
10.9 fps -9%
HP EliteBook 755 G4
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6.2 fps -48%
Thief
1024x768 Very Low Preset
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (34 - 36, n=2)
35 fps +3%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
34 fps
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (9.7 - 10, n=2)
9.85 fps +2%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
Vega 10, R7 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
9.7 fps
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 86 0 0 14
Thief (2014) 34 0 0 9.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 33 0 12

Barulho

Ocioso
30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB
Carga
37.5 / 35 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.633.832.532.732.62533.833.539.93533.83139.837.238.537.239.84032.131.831.431.832.15032.334.929.130.332.36328.728.229.330.828.78028.628.628.326.628.610027.525.82727.527.51252626.525.125.52616024.824.923.724.324.820023.823.223.323.323.825023.322.22322.623.331522.523.822.721.822.540022.222.322.120.722.250022.521.921.519.922.563024.321.621.119.424.380024.12422.418.624.1100024.724.822.318.424.7125025.62623.217.825.6160027.527.525.117.627.520002828.225.217.728250028.228.325.517.628.2315028.328.324.918.128.3400024.524.621.518.224.5500020.320.319.218.520.3630021.421.219.618.521.4800020.420.919.318.720.41000019.519.719.418.819.51250019.319.119.418.919.31600020.320.520.119.120.3SPL37.537.535.130.737.5N2.52.421.32.5median 24.1median 23.8median 22.4median 18.8median 24.1Delta2.62.52.41.92.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
Carga Máxima
 37.5 °C39.8 °C38 °C 
 32.7 °C37.6 °C36.4 °C 
 31 °C29.1 °C30.1 °C 
Máximo: 39.8 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
36.1 °C38.4 °C39.2 °C
35.5 °C35 °C40.2 °C
31.5 °C32 °C32.7 °C
Máximo: 40.2 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  47.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-3.3 °C / -5.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.932.735.92539.33539.33134.837.234.8403431.834503530.3356329.130.829.18026.926.626.910026.127.526.112527.525.527.516037.924.337.920044.523.344.525040.822.640.831554.221.854.240067.520.767.55006419.9646306519.46580063.318.663.3100068.518.468.5125071.917.871.9160066.817.666.8200069.317.769.3250070.417.670.4315071.418.171.4400069.618.269.6500069.818.569.8630068.618.568.6800064.118.764.11000067.618.867.61250065.918.965.91600060.619.160.6SPL80.930.780.9N47.11.347.1median 65.9median 18.8median 65.9Delta9.31.99.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EAApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.48 / 0.85 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5 / 10.6 / 12.9 Watt
Carga midlight 40.6 / 46.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
R7 2700U, Vega 10, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
R7 2700U, Vega 10, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TFT-LCD, 1920x1080, 14.00
Dell Latitude 5490
i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
HP EliteBook 755 G4
PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
15%
33%
19%
4%
16%
10%
Idle Minimum *
5
4.9
2%
3.1
38%
3.9
22%
7
-40%
4.73 ?(3.2 - 7, n=16)
5%
4.27 ?(2.2 - 9.4, n=107, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Average *
10.6
8.1
24%
6.4
40%
6.2
42%
10.9
-3%
7.61 ?(2.8 - 10.6, n=16)
28%
7.32 ?(3.8 - 20.6, n=107, last 2 years)
31%
Idle Maximum *
12.9
10.6
18%
9.4
27%
7.7
40%
11
15%
9.63 ?(7 - 12.9, n=16)
25%
9.1 ?(4.8 - 23.9, n=107, last 2 years)
29%
Load Average *
40.6
32.2
21%
29.8
27%
43.9
-8%
30.5
25%
33.3 ?(24.2 - 40.6, n=16)
18%
40.4 ?(8.7 - 75.2, n=106, last 2 years)
-0%
Load Maximum *
46.6
42.3
9%
31.2
33%
47.7
-2%
36.1
23%
45.1 ?(38.5 - 55.5, n=16)
3%
57.4 ?(11.1 - 101.4, n=107, last 2 years)
-23%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
11h 55min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 19min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 39min
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
R7 2700U, Vega 10, 56 Wh
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
R7 2700U, Vega 10, 50 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Dell Latitude 5490
i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh
HP EliteBook 755 G4
PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), 51 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
499
394
-21%
541
8%
695
39%
259
-48%
589 ?(272 - 1137, n=107, last 2 years)
18%

Pro

+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Boa cobertura de espaço de cores
+ Design atraente

Contra

- Contraste e valor de preto
- Sem slot para cartão SD
- O desempenho não é tão bom quanto poderia ser
Testing the HP EliteBook 755 G5. Test unit provided by HP Germany.
Testing the HP EliteBook 755 G5. Test unit provided by HP Germany.

A HP oferece uma atualização de geração cultivada para os compradores do EliteBook 755 G5. O desempenho da CPU AMD Ryzen 7-2700U é bom, mas poderia ter sido ainda melhor com um resfriamento otimizado. A tampa inferior removível oferece aos usuários acesso ao interior, permitindo que eles executem tarefas de manutenção. A boa cobertura do espaço de cores é levemente diminuída pelo alto valor de preto e baixo contraste.

O HP EliteBook 755 G5 é um atraente portátil empresarial com desempenho suficiente também para tarefas mais exigentes e uma duração de bateria que dura um dia inteiro de trabalho.

Os usuários recebem um dispositivo que é apresentável com seu design atraente e oferece duração de bateria suficiente para um dia útil. O fato de que o consumo de energia é maior do que em outros dispositivos não tem consequências graves e, além disso, dificilmente há razões que falem contra a compra do HP EliteBook 755 G5.

HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA - 07/24/2019 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
92 / 98 → 94%
Teclado
89%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
53 / 80 → 66%
Peso
66 / 20-67 → 97%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
65 / 68 → 95%
Desempenho da aplicação
80 / 92 → 87%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
92%
Audio
71%
Camera
27 / 85 → 32%
Médio
76%
86%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 755 G5 (Ryzen 7 2700U, Vega 10)
Mike Wobker, 2018-07-25 (Update: 2018-08- 2)