Notebookcheck Logo

Análise do Tablet Huawei MatePad T8 - O tablet de 99 euros (~$ 117) vale a pena?

A Huawei perdeu o memorando de que o ano em curso é 2020? O Huawei MatePad T8 é um dispositivo de menos de 100 euros (~$ 118). É por isso que certos compromissos tiveram que ser feitos em relação ao hardware. Se você tivesse apenas a folha de especificações do MatePad T8 na sua frente, provavelmente pensaria que era um tablet de 2017, não de 2020.
Huawei MatePad T8 (MatePad Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT8768 8 x 1.5 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A53, Mediatek MT8768
Placa gráfica
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
8.00 polegadas 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 189 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, LCD, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.7 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões de memória (microSD) de até 512 GB, Sensores: Sensor de movimento, OTG, indicador LED
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, LTE FDD: B1 / B3 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B26 / B28, TD-LTE: B38 / B40 / B41, UMTS: B1 / B2 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19, GSM: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.55 x 199.7 x 121.1
Bateria
5100 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2 aperture, Camera2 API: full support
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix Apertura f/2.4
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: mono, Teclado: virtual, carregador, cabo microUSB, guia de início rápido, informação de garantia, EMUI 10, 24 Meses Garantia, Widevine L3, fanless
peso
310 g, Suprimento de energia: 43 g
Preço
119 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.5 %
09/2020
Huawei MatePad T8
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320
310 g8.55 mm8.00"1280x800
80.6 %
08/2020
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
MT8168, Mali-G52 MP1
355 g9.7 mm8.00"1280x800
80.8 %
08/2020
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
MT8168, Mali-G52 MP1
355 g9.7 mm8.00"1280x800
81 %
01/2020
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320
305 g8.2 mm8.00"1280x800
79.6 %
01/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
SD 429, Adreno 504
345 g8 mm8.00"1280x800

Size Comparison

210 mm 124.4 mm 8 mm 345 g202 mm 137 mm 9.7 mm 355 g202 mm 137 mm 9.7 mm 355 g199.7 mm 121.1 mm 8.55 mm 310 g199 mm 129 mm 8.2 mm 305 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MatePad T8
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 16 GB eMMC Flash
350 (174min - 394max) MBit/s
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
Mali-G52 MP1, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
348 (175min - 353max) MBit/s -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
Mali-G52 MP1, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
348 (175min - 353max) MBit/s -1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
271 (183min - 335max) MBit/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
115 (109min - 121max) MBit/s -67%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MatePad T8
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 16 GB eMMC Flash
347 (311min - 360max) MBit/s
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
Mali-G52 MP1, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
330 (313min - 336max) MBit/s -5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
Mali-G52 MP1, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
330 (313min - 336max) MBit/s -5%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
294 (256min - 307max) MBit/s -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
101 (86min - 107max) MBit/s -71%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Huawei MatePad T8; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (311-360)
Huawei MatePad T8; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø344 (174-394)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
5-MP camera
5-MP camera
4X Zoom (max)
4X Zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleLow-light photography4X zoomWide-angle
click to load images
ColorChecker
6.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
0.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad T8: 5.33 ∆E min: 0.9 - max: 11.74 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
28 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
76.3 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
93 ∆E
71 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad T8: 46.61 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 92.97 ∆E
314
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 325.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.75 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 331 cd/m²
Contraste: 2069:1 (Preto: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
85.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
Huawei MatePad T8
LCD, 1280x800, 8.00
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
IPS, 1280x800, 8.00
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
IPS, 1280x800, 8.00
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
IPS, 1280x800, 8.00
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
TFT, 1280x800, 8.00
Screen
10%
12%
-7%
-33%
Brightness middle
331
490
48%
501
51%
379
15%
377
14%
Brightness
326
447
37%
463
42%
346
6%
372
14%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
85
-8%
88
-4%
87
-5%
Black Level *
0.16
0.23
-44%
0.25
-56%
0.21
-31%
0.29
-81%
Contrast
2069
2130
3%
2004
-3%
1805
-13%
1300
-37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.1
4
2%
3.6
12%
3.8
7%
6.1
-49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.2
8.3
-15%
8.4
-17%
7.5
-4%
10.9
-51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.9
2
49%
1
74%
5
-28%
6.6
-69%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.29 96%
2.17 101%
2.23 99%
2.13 103%
CCT
7355 88%
6618 98%
6473 100%
7514 87%
7861 83%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 12.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=67, last 2 years)
670 Points +396%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
168 Points +24%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (135 - 179, n=4)
156 Points +16%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
144 Points +7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
141 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad T8
135 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=67, last 2 years)
2377 Points +377%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (498 - 1003, n=4)
775 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
566 Points +14%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
500 Points 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
499 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
498 Points
OpenCL Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (452 - 10879, n=15, last 2 years)
2999 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
138 Points
Vulkan Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (89 - 9073, n=16, last 2 years)
2938 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768
89 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Points
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (745 - 5713, n=16, last 2 years)
2876 Points +265%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
833 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad T8
789 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768
789 Points 0%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (1418 - 15310, n=16, last 2 years)
8283 Points +121%
Huawei MatePad T8
3745 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768
3745 Points 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
2476 Points -34%
Compute RenderScript Score
Average of class Tablet (2128 - 10799, n=11, last 2 years)
6957 Points +147%
Huawei MatePad T8
2814 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768
2814 Points 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1733 Points -38%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7019 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad T8
6694 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (5647 - 6694, n=2)
6171 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5986 Points -11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
5667 Points -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5620 Points -16%
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MatePad T8
4964 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4946 Points 0%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (4536 - 4964, n=2)
4750 Points -4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4509 Points -9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4454 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4267 Points -14%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
13743 Points +12%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
13698 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad T8
12265 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (11849 - 12265, n=3)
11993 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8580 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
7879 Points -36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
13426 Points +10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
13333 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad T8
12210 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (11994 - 12210, n=3)
12081 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7658 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6897 Points -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
15709 Points +21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
15151 Points +17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
14979 Points +15%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14822 Points +14%
Huawei MatePad T8
12969 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (11228 - 12969, n=3)
11876 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Tablet (507 - 8472, n=19, last 2 years)
2878 Points +319%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
958 Points +39%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
955 Points +39%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (687 - 880, n=4)
744 Points +8%
Huawei MatePad T8
687 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
484 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (454 - 10759, n=19, last 2 years)
3021 Points +402%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
901 Points +50%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
898 Points +49%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (602 - 801, n=4)
672 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad T8
602 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
427 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
364 Points -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average of class Tablet (863 - 4858, n=19, last 2 years)
2901 Points +163%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1228 Points +11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1228 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1178 Points +7%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (1009 - 1346, n=4)
1148 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad T8
1102 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (539 - 17675, n=28, last 2 years)
5681 Points +602%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
956 Points +18%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
956 Points +18%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (775 - 952, n=4)
843 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad T8
809 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
517 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (485 - 35165, n=28, last 2 years)
8154 Points +966%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
893 Points +17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
892 Points +17%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (733 - 881, n=4)
788 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad T8
765 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
458 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
336 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (463 - 6449, n=28, last 2 years)
3683 Points +224%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1280 Points +13%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1268 Points +12%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (969 - 1328, n=4)
1146 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1145 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad T8
1136 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
943 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (361 - 14235, n=50, last 2 years)
2040 Points +333%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
651 Points +38%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
647 Points +37%
Huawei MatePad T8
471 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (400 - 503, n=4)
446 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
279 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
190 Points -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (290 - 24605, n=50, last 2 years)
2153 Points +434%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
573 Points +42%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
570 Points +41%
Huawei MatePad T8
403 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (341 - 427, n=4)
380 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
233 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
153 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Tablet (858 - 5751, n=50, last 2 years)
2794 Points +148%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1243 Points +10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1233 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1188 Points +6%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (1018 - 1333, n=4)
1152 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad T8
1126 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (267 - 14235, n=58, last 2 years)
3148 Points +442%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
643 Points +11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
641 Points +10%
Huawei MatePad T8
581 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (455 - 581, n=4)
521 Points -10%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
302 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
257 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (240 - 24605, n=58, last 2 years)
3723 Points +664%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
563 Points +16%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
562 Points +15%
Huawei MatePad T8
487 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (396 - 487, n=4)
446 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
253 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
210 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (441 - 5751, n=58, last 2 years)
3216 Points +53%
Huawei MatePad T8
2101 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (957 - 2101, n=4)
1390 Points -34%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1277 Points -39%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1265 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1155 Points -45%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
939 Points -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (615 - 4741, n=49, last 2 years)
1765 Points +276%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
713 Points +52%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
712 Points +52%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (469 - 664, n=3)
569 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
550 Points +17%
Huawei MatePad T8
469 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (521 - 5731, n=49, last 2 years)
1749 Points +335%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
607 Points +51%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
606 Points +51%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (402 - 556, n=3)
478 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
460 Points +14%
Huawei MatePad T8
402 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (1671 - 3199, n=49, last 2 years)
2484 Points +116%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1833 Points +59%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1823 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1786 Points +55%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (1152 - 2080, n=3)
1760 Points +53%
Huawei MatePad T8
1152 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (14 - 120, n=57, last 2 years)
58.2 fps +94%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
33 fps +10%
Huawei MatePad T8
30 fps
Average Mediatek MT8768 (19 - 31, n=3)
26.7 fps -11%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
21 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
17 fps -43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (15 - 873, n=57, last 2 years)
135.6 fps +578%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
21 fps +5%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (19 - 22, n=3)
20.3 fps +2%
Huawei MatePad T8
20 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
11 fps -45%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 120, n=57, last 2 years)
44.7 fps +135%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
24 fps +26%
Huawei MatePad T8
19 fps
Average Mediatek MT8768 (10 - 19, n=3)
15 fps -21%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
12 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
9.5 fps -50%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 494, n=57, last 2 years)
82.5 fps +725%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
12 fps +20%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (10 - 12, n=3)
11 fps +10%
Huawei MatePad T8
10 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
6.6 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4.8 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 118.3, n=57, last 2 years)
32.9 fps +153%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
17 fps +31%
Huawei MatePad T8
13 fps
Average Mediatek MT8768 (7 - 13, n=3)
11 fps -15%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8.5 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6.9 fps -47%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (5 - 340, n=57, last 2 years)
56.3 fps +693%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
7.6 fps +7%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (6.9 - 8.3, n=3)
7.43 fps +5%
Huawei MatePad T8
7.1 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.3 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.2 fps -55%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 94.5, n=57, last 2 years)
20.4 fps +285%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
9.2 fps +74%
Huawei MatePad T8
5.3 fps
Average Mediatek MT8768 (3.3 - 5.3, n=3)
4.53 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.8 fps -28%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
3.6 fps -32%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 214, n=57, last 2 years)
33.4 fps +448%
Huawei MatePad T8
6.1 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4.8 fps -21%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (3 - 6.1, n=3)
4.03 fps -34%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1.9 fps -69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.8 fps -70%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 97.3, n=68, last 2 years)
14.1 fps +207%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5.5 fps +20%
Huawei MatePad T8
4.6 fps
Average Mediatek MT8768 (2.2 - 5.2, n=4)
3.58 fps -22%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.9 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
2 fps -57%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 90, n=68, last 2 years)
13.2 fps +780%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1.8 fps +20%
Huawei MatePad T8
1.5 fps
Average Mediatek MT8768 (1.4 - 1.5, n=4)
1.45 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
0.85 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
0.8 fps -47%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3 - 111, n=68, last 2 years)
20.7 fps +172%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
9.7 fps +28%
Huawei MatePad T8
7.6 fps
Average Mediatek MT8768 (3.6 - 8.2, n=4)
5.78 fps -24%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.6 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.1 fps -59%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 279, n=68, last 2 years)
35.4 fps +808%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5.1 fps +31%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (3.9 - 4.2, n=4)
3.98 fps +2%
Huawei MatePad T8
3.9 fps
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.3 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.7 fps -56%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad T8
91467 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (89714 - 91467, n=2)
90591 Points -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
90442 Points -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
90422 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
79125 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
78450 Points -14%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=51, last 2 years)
3569 Points +181%
Huawei MatePad T8
1269 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (1185 - 1269, n=3)
1226 Points -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1150 Points -9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1150 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
987 Points -22%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
891 Points -30%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=51, last 2 years)
6449 Points +148%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (2564 - 2653, n=3)
2605 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
2598 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1945 Points -25%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1802 Points -31%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1788 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1539 Points -41%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=51, last 2 years)
4229 Points +210%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1416 Points +4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1406 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad T8
1365 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1258 Points -8%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (1046 - 1365, n=3)
1167 Points -15%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1151 Points -16%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=51, last 2 years)
6458 Points +619%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
947 Points +5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
946 Points +5%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (871 - 1014, n=3)
928 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad T8
898 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
487 Points -46%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
472 Points -47%
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=51, last 2 years)
1196 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
809 Points +6%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (762 - 810, n=3)
790 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad T8
762 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
756 Points -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
731 Points -4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
730 Points -4%

Legend

 
Huawei MatePad T8 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 MediaTek MT8168, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 MediaTek MT8168, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M8 HD Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Qualcomm Adreno 504, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=58, last 2 years)
83.7 Points +500%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (14 - 23.3, n=3)
18.1 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
16.09 Points +15%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
13.96 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points -100%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years)
85.4 Points +272%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
25.65 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
25.07 Points +9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
23.99 Points +4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
23.56 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
22.97 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (22.1 - 23, n=2)
22.5 Points -2%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=41, last 2 years)
118.7 Points +283%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
34 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
32 Points +3%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (24 - 39, n=4)
31.8 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
31 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
30 Points -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
30 Points -3%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=51, last 2 years)
75.2 runs/min +464%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
15.49 runs/min +16%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (13.3 - 17.3, n=2)
15.3 runs/min +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
13.5 runs/min +1%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
13.34 runs/min
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
12.2 runs/min -9%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=70, last 2 years)
22748 Points +440%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (4070 - 6281, n=3)
4855 Points +15%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
4378 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
4297 Points +2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
4222 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
4215 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
4115 Points -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
11258 ms *
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
11254 ms * -0%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (10163 - 12342, n=4)
11131 ms * +1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
11103 ms * +1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
10894 ms * +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
10655 ms * +5%
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=58, last 2 years)
3251 ms * +71%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MatePad T8Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020Amazon Fire HD 8 2020Lenovo Tab M8 HDSamsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
15%
16%
12%
17%
-41%
506%
Sequential Read 256KB
274.1
314.2
15%
315
15%
297.1
8%
291.9
6%
164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256)
-40%
850 ?(163 - 3414, n=66, last 2 years)
210%
Sequential Write 256KB
67.4
100.2
49%
103.9
54%
79.6
18%
108.5
61%
43 ?(8.74 - 106.3, n=256)
-36%
535 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=66, last 2 years)
694%
Random Read 4KB
57.5
69.1
20%
67.6
18%
77.4
35%
57.8
1%
21.7 ?(2.49 - 62.1, n=256)
-62%
167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=66, last 2 years)
190%
Random Write 4KB
14.63
15.62
7%
15.72
7%
15.84
8%
16.89
15%
8.08 ?(0.49 - 44.9, n=256)
-45%
150.6 ?(8.23 - 503, n=66, last 2 years)
929%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
84.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
83.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
87.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137)
-29%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
62 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
64.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
69.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
39.8 ?(6.38 - 65.8, n=137)
-36%
PUBG Mobile
0510152025Tooltip
Huawei MatePad T8; Smooth: Ø24.5 (19-27)
Huawei MatePad T8; Smooth: Ø24.5 (17-26)
Real Racing 3
051015202530Tooltip
Huawei MatePad T8: Ø23.7 (17-32)
Carga Máxima
 26.6 °C26.1 °C27.2 °C 
 26.6 °C25.9 °C27.8 °C 
 26.2 °C25.8 °C27.3 °C 
Máximo: 27.8 °C
Médio: 26.6 °C
26.2 °C26.3 °C26.6 °C
25.7 °C26.5 °C26.6 °C
25.5 °C26 °C26.7 °C
Máximo: 26.7 °C
Médio: 26.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Review of the Huawei MatePad T8
Review of the Huawei MatePad T8
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.947.6252945.53121.941.34022475029.948.4632249.48019.349.110016.352.91251452.316016.954.220014.955.825014.156.33151057.3400115950011.763.963010.968.280011.972.610001173.9125010.277.9160011.477.1200012.879.4250012.984.5315012.587.240001388500013.184.7630013.481.6800015.777.11000013.574125001469.41600013.765.1SPL24.894.6N0.695.3median 13median 73.9Delta1.312.529.83325.226.621.626.924.717.929.625.522.523.925.126.320.125.819.926.920.836.917.641.117.647.417.450.316.153.613.95514.559.216.161.314.56714.471.513.672.113.973.514.576.114.477.814.877.614.776.814.873.614.971.915.170.91562.615.147.426.9860.959.1median 14.9median 62.61.612.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MatePad T8Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MatePad T8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab M8 HD audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.17 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.68 / 2.24 / 2.27 Watt
Carga midlight 3.06 / 4.45 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei MatePad T8
5100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4850 mAh
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Power Consumption
-19%
-23%
10%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
0.68
0.74
-9%
0.72
-6%
0.66
3%
0.62
9%
Idle Average *
2.24
2.81
-25%
2.97
-33%
2.15
4%
2.68
-20%
Idle Maximum *
2.27
2.83
-25%
2.99
-32%
2.18
4%
2.7
-19%
Load Average *
3.06
3.73
-22%
4.02
-31%
2.48
19%
3.61
-18%
Load Maximum *
4.45
4.97
-12%
5.1
-15%
3.49
22%
4
10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
39h 53min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 57min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 59min
Huawei MatePad T8
5100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4850 mAh
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-8%
-8%
30%
-1%
Reader / Idle
2393
2661
11%
3581
50%
3132
31%
H.264
1137
949
-17%
1696
49%
934
-18%
WiFi v1.3
949
869
-8%
902
-5%
1124
18%
831
-12%
Load
359
286
-20%
374
4%
342
-5%

Pro

+ Tela com alta relação de contraste
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ Módulo GPS
+ Ótima duração da bateria

Contra

- Baixo brilho
- Sem sensor de luz ambiente
- Baixa resolução
- Apenas 16/32 GB
- 2 GB de RAM
- Porta microUSB
- Longos tempos de carga
- Sem GMS

Veredicto para o MatePad T8 - As soluções alternativas da Huawei não compensam a perda de serviços do Google Play

In review: Huawei MatePad T8 tablet. Device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Huawei MatePad T8 tablet. Device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de

Quando se trata de desempenho, qualidade de construção e duração da bateria, o T8 é muito competitivo. O módulo Wi-Fi do Huawei atinge os melhores resultados em nosso teste de Wi-Fi. Por um pequeno acréscimo de 20 euros (~$ 23), os compradores podem obter uma versão com um modem LTE. 

O painel IPS tem ângulos de visão relativamente estáveis e a reprodução de cores está em um bom nível para um tablet de 100 euros (~$ 118). No entanto, a tela não é brilhante o suficiente para uso externo em dias ensolarados. Se algum dispositivo deve ou não ser fornecido com 2 GB de RAM e 16 GB de memória eMMC em 2020 está em debate. Porém, em nossa opinião, o fato de que nenhum dispositivo deve vir com uma porta microUSB e um carregador de 5 watts não é mais discutível. 

Por causa da situação com Google, é muito difícil chegar a qualquer tipo de conclusão sobre o MatePad T8 de baixo preço. Você pode assistir a vídeos do YouTube, navegar na web ou ler arquivos PDF com o T8. Os aplicativos que não requerem o uso do Google Play Services funcionarão bem. No entanto, se seus aplicativos favoritos dependem do Google Play Services, você está sem sorte. Além disso, o AppGallery da Huawei não apresenta uma ampla seleção de aplicativos. 

A Huawei não consegue compensar a perda que muitos usuários terão devido ao fato de que seu tablet básico não oferece suporte ao Google Play Services. O T8 não oferece nenhum recurso matador que o diferencie da multidão.

Huawei MatePad T8 - 09/18/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
78 / 98 → 79%
Teclado
67 / 80 → 84%
Mouse
84%
Conectividade
38 / 70 → 54%
Peso
86 / 40-88 → 96%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
8 / 78 → 11%
Desempenho da aplicação
43 / 92 → 47%
Temperatura
96%
Ruído
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 83%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Médio
68%
81%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Análise do Tablet Huawei MatePad T8 - O tablet de 99 euros (~$ 117) vale a pena?
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-09-26 (Update: 2020-09-26)