Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Lenovo Tab M8 HD: Navegação e streaming por pouco dinheiro

Android Pie em uma carcaça fina. A Lenovo atualizou sua gama de tablets acessíveis e criou um dispositivo Android Pie com uma tela de 8 polegadas: o Tab M8 HD. O tablet está disponível a partir de US$ 140 e, desde que os usuários não esperem um desempenho particularmente alto, eles não ficarão decepcionados com o que recebem pelo seu dinheiro.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto),
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Tab M Serie)
Processador
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M 4 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
PowerVR GE8320
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
8 polegadas 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 189 PPI, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32 até 128 GB, exFAT até 2 TB), Sensores: Sensor de posição
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 199 x 129
Bateria
5100 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, Teclado: onscreen, Adaptador de força USB, cabo MicroUSB, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
305 g, Suprimento de energia: 56 g
Preço
129 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
01/2020
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320
305 g8.2 mm8"1280x800
77 %
11/2018
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720
363 g9.7 mm8"1280x800
79 %
03/2019
Alldocube M8 T801
MT6797X, Mali-T880 MP4
345 g8.48 mm8"1920x1200
83 %
05/2018
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8
316 g7.3 mm8.4"2560x1600
80 %
01/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
SD 429, Adreno 504
345 g8 mm8"1280x800

Size Comparison

215 mm 128 mm 9.7 mm 363 g215 mm 122.9 mm 8.48 mm 345 g212.6 mm 124.8 mm 7.3 mm 316 g210 mm 124.4 mm 8 mm 345 g199 mm 129 mm 8.2 mm 305 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
294 (256min - 307max) MBit/s ∼100%
Alldocube M8 T801
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash
235 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 32 GB eMMC Flash
203 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
101 (86min - 107max) MBit/s ∼34% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
99.9 (90min - 106max) MBit/s ∼34% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
271 (183min - 335max) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Alldocube M8 T801
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash
195 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
115 (109min - 121max) MBit/s ∼42% -58%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.4 (82min - 110max) MBit/s ∼36% -64%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø291 (256-307)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø271 (183-335)
GNSS - Lenovo Tab M8 HD
GNSS - Lenovo Tab M8 HD
GNSS - Lenovo Tab M8 HD
GNSS - Lenovo Tab M8 HD
GNSS - Lenovo Tab M8 HD
GNSS - Lenovo Tab M8 HD
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
28.7 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
45.5 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
65.7 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
77.5 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
45.7 ∆E
94.4 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M8 HD: 47.43 ∆E min: 13.67 - max: 94.37 ∆E
ColorChecker
7 ∆E
7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M8 HD: 6.06 ∆E min: 1.67 - max: 12.28 ∆E
Lenovo Tab M8 HD - test chart
Lenovo Tab M8 HD - test chart (detail)
Lenovo Tab M8 HD - test chart (1 lux)
340
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 379 cd/m² Médio: 345.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.06 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 379 cd/m²
Contraste: 1805:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6
85.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Alldocube M8 T801
IPS, 1920x1200, 8
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
TFT, 1280x800, 8
Screen
-81%
-48%
-49%
-25%
Brightness middle
379
359
-5%
317.5
-16%
405
7%
377
-1%
Brightness
346
358
3%
320
-8%
392
13%
372
8%
Brightness Distribution
88
89
1%
94
7%
92
5%
87
-1%
Black Level *
0.21
0.85
-305%
0.5
-138%
0.67
-219%
0.29
-38%
Contrast
1805
422
-77%
635
-65%
604
-67%
1300
-28%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.8
6.8
-79%
6.12
-61%
5.78
-52%
6.1
-61%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.5
17.3
-131%
13.72
-83%
9.82
-31%
10.9
-45%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
7.6
-52%
5.8
-16%
7.2
-44%
6.6
-32%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
2.12 104%
2.278 97%
2.13 103%
CCT
7514 87%
7160 91%
7633 85%
8405 77%
7861 83%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17714 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.6 ms rise
↘ 32.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).
Geekbench 5
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (375 - 4661, n=9)
1480 Points ∼9% +175%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
552 Points ∼3% +3%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
538 Points ∼3%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
538 Points ∼3% 0%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (134 - 1114, n=9)
491 Points ∼12% +205%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
168 Points ∼4% +4%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
161 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
161 Points ∼4% 0%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
6509 Points ∼11%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=61)
4628 Points ∼8%
Alldocube M8 T801
3590 Points ∼6%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
2471 Points ∼4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
1751 Points ∼3%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1896 Points ∼30%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=61)
1624 Points ∼26%
Alldocube M8 T801
1352 Points ∼21%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
825 Points ∼13%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
636 Points ∼10%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
6006 Points ∼39% +21%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4946 Points ∼32%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
4946 Points ∼32% 0%
Alldocube M8 T801
4695 Points ∼31% -5%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 9615, n=55)
4542 Points ∼30% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4267 Points ∼28% -14%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
3130 Points ∼20% -37%
Work performance score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
7053 Points ∼35% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7019 Points ∼35%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6194 - 7019, n=2)
6607 Points ∼33% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5986 Points ∼30% -15%
Alldocube M8 T801
5984 Points ∼30% -15%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 11644, n=91)
5018 Points ∼25% -29%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
4165 Points ∼21% -41%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2552 Points ∼32% +172%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 4756, n=55)
1815 Points ∼23% +93%
Alldocube M8 T801
1372 Points ∼17% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1155 Points ∼14% +23%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
939 Points ∼12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (763 - 939, n=2)
851 Points ∼11% -9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
716 Points ∼9% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1910 Points ∼20% +655%
Average of class Tablet (99 - 6993, n=55)
1702 Points ∼18% +573%
Alldocube M8 T801
1108 Points ∼12% +338%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (253 - 260, n=2)
257 Points ∼3% +2%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
253 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
210 Points ∼2% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
120 Points ∼1% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2023 Points ∼24% +570%
Average of class Tablet (129 - 5816, n=55)
1533 Points ∼19% +408%
Alldocube M8 T801
1157 Points ∼14% +283%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (302 - 305, n=2)
304 Points ∼4% +1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
302 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
257 Points ∼3% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
147 Points ∼2% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2268 Points ∼39% +141%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4702, n=62)
1713 Points ∼30% +82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1145 Points ∼20% +21%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
943 Points ∼16%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (807 - 943, n=2)
875 Points ∼15% -7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
739 Points ∼13% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=62)
2923 Points ∼10% +538%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2461 Points ∼9% +437%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
458 Points ∼2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (445 - 458, n=2)
452 Points ∼2% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
336 Points ∼1% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
202 Points ∼1% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2415 Points ∼18% +367%
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=62)
2033 Points ∼15% +293%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
517 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (494 - 517, n=2)
506 Points ∼4% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points ∼3% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
241 Points ∼2% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2653 Points ∼51% +194%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4096, n=71)
1728 Points ∼33% +91%
Alldocube M8 T801
1654 Points ∼32% +83%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1188 Points ∼23% +32%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points ∼17%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (828 - 903, n=2)
866 Points ∼17% -4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
855 Points ∼16% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1778 Points ∼21% +663%
Average of class Tablet (55 - 6128, n=71)
1366 Points ∼16% +486%
Alldocube M8 T801
995 Points ∼12% +327%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
233 Points ∼3%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (225 - 233, n=2)
229 Points ∼3% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
153 Points ∼2% -34%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
126 Points ∼1% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1919 Points ∼9% +588%
Average of class Tablet (70 - 5346, n=73)
1291 Points ∼6% +363%
Alldocube M8 T801
1092 Points ∼5% +291%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
279 Points ∼1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (268 - 279, n=2)
274 Points ∼1% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
190 Points ∼1% -32%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
155 Points ∼1% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2555 Points ∼48% +183%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 4056, n=75)
1612 Points ∼31% +79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1178 Points ∼22% +30%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points ∼17%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (840 - 903, n=2)
872 Points ∼17% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
815 Points ∼15% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2501 Points ∼20% +486%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 10647, n=75)
1898 Points ∼15% +344%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
427 Points ∼3%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (403 - 427, n=2)
415 Points ∼3% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
364 Points ∼3% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
212 Points ∼2% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2513 Points ∼26% +419%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 6997, n=76)
1584 Points ∼17% +227%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
484 Points ∼5%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (456 - 484, n=2)
470 Points ∼5% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points ∼4% -12%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
254 Points ∼3% -48%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
15709 Points ∼18% +6%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14822 Points ∼17%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (14128 - 14822, n=2)
14475 Points ∼17% -2%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51374, n=171)
14058 Points ∼16% -5%
Alldocube M8 T801
9771 Points ∼11% -34%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
8724 Points ∼10% -41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=171)
23455 Points ∼4% +206%
Alldocube M8 T801
14192 Points ∼3% +85%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7658 Points ∼1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6785 - 7658, n=2)
7222 Points ∼1% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6897 Points ∼1% -10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
5446 Points ∼1% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=172)
17777 Points ∼7% +107%
Alldocube M8 T801
12895 Points ∼5% +50%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8580 Points ∼3%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (7671 - 8580, n=2)
8126 Points ∼3% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
7879 Points ∼3% -8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
5942 Points ∼2% -31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
78 fps ∼1% +457%
Alldocube M8 T801
39 fps ∼0% +179%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=190)
34 fps ∼0% +143%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (13 - 14, n=2)
13.5 fps ∼0% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
11 fps ∼0% -21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
10 fps ∼0% -29%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
51 fps ∼2% +143%
Alldocube M8 T801
35 fps ∼1% +67%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=194)
22.5 fps ∼1% +7%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
21 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (19 - 21, n=2)
20 fps ∼1% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
17 fps ∼1% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
16 fps ∼0% -24%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
39 fps ∼6% +491%
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=124)
22.8 fps ∼4% +245%
Alldocube M8 T801
19 fps ∼3% +188%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
6.6 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (6.3 - 6.6, n=2)
6.45 fps ∼1% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4.8 fps ∼1% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
3.6 fps ∼1% -45%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
24 fps ∼7% +100%
Alldocube M8 T801
19 fps ∼5% +58%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=130)
16 fps ∼4% +33%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
12 fps ∼3%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (12 - 12, n=2)
12 fps ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
9.5 fps ∼3% -21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
7.3 fps ∼2% -39%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
27 fps ∼1% +528%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=76)
20.2 fps ∼0% +370%
Alldocube M8 T801
13 fps ∼0% +202%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.3 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4 - 4.3, n=2)
4.15 fps ∼0% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.2 fps ∼0% -26%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
2.3 fps ∼0% -47%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
14 fps ∼0% +65%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=76)
13.6 fps ∼0% +60%
Alldocube M8 T801
12 fps ∼0% +41%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8.5 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (7.5 - 8.5, n=2)
8 fps ∼0% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6.9 fps ∼0% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
5.1 fps ∼0% -40%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=26)
9.37 fps ∼6% +223%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.9 fps ∼2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (2.7 - 2.9, n=2)
2.8 fps ∼2% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
2 fps ∼1% -31%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=26)
9.21 fps ∼4% +984%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
0.85 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (0.85 - 0.85, n=2)
0.85 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
0.8 fps ∼0% -6%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=26)
13.9 fps ∼7% +202%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.6 fps ∼2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4.3 - 4.6, n=2)
4.45 fps ∼2% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.1 fps ∼2% -33%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=26)
24.7 fps ∼4% +974%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.3 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (2.3 - 2.3, n=2)
2.3 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.7 fps ∼0% -26%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
16 fps ∼4% +742%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=52)
14.5 fps ∼3% +663%
Alldocube M8 T801
7.3 fps ∼2% +284%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1.9 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (1.9 - 1.9, n=2)
1.9 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.8 fps ∼0% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
9.3 fps ∼4% +158%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=52)
9.05 fps ∼3% +151%
Alldocube M8 T801
7.3 fps ∼3% +103%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.8 fps ∼1% +6%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
3.6 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (3.2 - 3.6, n=2)
3.4 fps ∼1% -6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
AnTuTu v8
UX
Average of class Tablet (10934 - 99771, n=12)
44055 Points ∼40% +188%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
15291 Points ∼14%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
15291 Points ∼14% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
10934 Points ∼10% -28%
MEM
Average of class Tablet (13757 - 110684, n=12)
42813 Points ∼35% +67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
27445 Points ∼22% +7%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
25641 Points ∼21%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
25641 Points ∼21% 0%
GPU
Average of class Tablet (4118 - 377397, n=12)
113550 Points ∼30% +2657%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4783 Points ∼1% +16%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4118 Points ∼1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
4118 Points ∼1% 0%
CPU
Average of class Tablet (3972 - 187788, n=12)
83831 Points ∼45% +146%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
35288 Points ∼19% +4%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
34075 Points ∼18%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
34075 Points ∼18% 0%
Total Score
Average of class Tablet (78450 - 751846, n=12)
287248 Points ∼38% +263%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
79125 Points ∼11%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
79125 Points ∼11% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
78450 Points ∼10% -1%
AnTuTu v7
MEM
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
10920 Points ∼34%
Average of class Tablet (4042 - 14613, n=32)
7659 Points ∼24%
Alldocube M8 T801
5964 Points ∼18%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
5659 Points ∼17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
4493 Points ∼14%
UX
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
42825 Points ∼53%
Average of class Tablet (9180 - 79058, n=32)
34417 Points ∼42%
Alldocube M8 T801
27020 Points ∼33%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
18552 Points ∼23%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
13368 Points ∼16%
GPU
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
65542 Points ∼20%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 322193, n=32)
59641 Points ∼19%
Alldocube M8 T801
28298 Points ∼9%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
7993 Points ∼2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
2432 Points ∼1%
CPU
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
62327 Points ∼38%
Average of class Tablet (7439 - 163321, n=32)
59158 Points ∼36%
Alldocube M8 T801
44590 Points ∼27%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
29549 Points ∼18%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
20724 Points ∼13%
Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
181614 Points ∼32%
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=32)
160864 Points ∼28%
Alldocube M8 T801
105872 Points ∼19%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
61753 Points ∼11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
41017 Points ∼7%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1215 Points ∼60% +61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
809 Points ∼40% +7%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=120)
759 Points ∼37% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
756 Points ∼37%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (733 - 756, n=2)
745 Points ∼37% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
597 Points ∼29% -21%
Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
4143 Points ∼14% +778%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=121)
2270 Points ∼8% +381%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
487 Points ∼2% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (472 - 482, n=2)
477 Points ∼2% +1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
472 Points ∼2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
333 Points ∼1% -29%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
3985 Points ∼45% +246%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1258 Points ∼14% +9%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 6751, n=121)
1193 Points ∼13% +4%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1151 Points ∼13%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (607 - 1151, n=2)
879 Points ∼10% -24%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
663 Points ∼7% -42%
System
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
3940 Points ∼24% +156%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=121)
2577 Points ∼16% +67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1945 Points ∼12% +26%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1539 Points ∼9%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (1434 - 1539, n=2)
1487 Points ∼9% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
1200 Points ∼7% -22%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2982 Points ∼35% +235%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=120)
1341 Points ∼16% +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
987 Points ∼12% +11%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
891 Points ∼11%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (745 - 891, n=2)
818 Points ∼10% -8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
631 Points ∼7% -29%

Legend

 
Lenovo Tab M8 HD Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alldocube M8 T801 MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Qualcomm Adreno 504, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=102)
57.9 Points ∼100% +126%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
56.76 Points ∼98% +121%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
30.352 Points ∼52% +18%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
25.645 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
25.067 Points ∼43% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (23.5 - 25.6, n=2)
24.6 Points ∼42% -4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)
16.717 Points ∼29% -35%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
72 Points ∼100% +112%
Average of class Tablet (13 - 182, n=37)
71.6 Points ∼99% +111%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
34 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
32 Points ∼44% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (30 - 34, n=2)
32 Points ∼44% -6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)
25 Points ∼35% -26%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 135, n=24)
50.4 runs/min ∼100% +225%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
15.5 runs/min ∼31% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
15.49 runs/min ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
13.5 runs/min ∼27% -13%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
11338 Points ∼100% +159%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=187)
7392 Points ∼65% +69%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
5909 Points ∼52% +35%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
4378 Points ∼39%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (4332 - 4378, n=2)
4355 Points ∼38% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
4297 Points ∼38% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)
2902 Points ∼26% -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10)
14320.9 ms * ∼100% -31%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
10893.8 ms * ∼76%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M (10740 - 10894, n=2)
10817 ms * ∼76% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
10654.6 ms * ∼74% +2%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=199)
8970 ms * ∼63% +18%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
7429.3 ms * ∼52% +32%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
3734 ms * ∼26% +66%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo Tab M8 HDAmazon Fire HD 8 2018Alldocube M8 T801Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-45%
-34%
60%
5%
-10%
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
34.03 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-47%
70.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
69.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
52.1 (3.4 - 87.1, n=166)
-19%
49.7 (14 - 73.8, n=70)
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
51.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-39%
84.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
87.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
71.1 (8.2 - 96.5, n=166)
-15%
67.7 (17.6 - 87.7, n=70)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
15.84
12.25
-23%
10.01
-37%
65.1
311%
16.89
7%
18.9 (0.75 - 89.5, n=209)
19%
9.33 (0.13 - 262, n=219)
-41%
Random Read 4KB
77.44
26.98
-65%
19.5
-75%
62.8
-19%
57.77
-25%
40.9 (3.59 - 117, n=209)
-47%
23.6 (1.04 - 225, n=219)
-70%
Sequential Write 256KB
79.55
41.89
-47%
103.02
30%
132.24
66%
108.54
36%
96.7 (14.8 - 189, n=209)
22%
49.6 (2.04 - 522, n=219)
-38%
Sequential Read 256KB
297.09
158.46
-47%
142.8
-52%
268.62
-10%
291.87
-2%
239 (25.8 - 452, n=209)
-20%
135 (6.75 - 1789, n=219)
-55%
Asphalt 9: Legends
0102030Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø11.7 (1-22)
; Standard / low: Ø18.7 (11-24)
Arena of Valor
010203040506070Tooltip
; min: Ø56.2 (48-61)
; high HD: Ø43.2 (24-60)
Carga Máxima
 24.5 °C24.1 °C26.2 °C 
 25.3 °C24 °C25.9 °C 
 24.5 °C24.9 °C25.6 °C 
Máximo: 26.2 °C
Médio: 25 °C
24.2 °C24.2 °C24.7 °C
24.2 °C24.6 °C25.7 °C
24.2 °C24.4 °C25.9 °C
Máximo: 25.9 °C
Médio: 24.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
Heat map - top
Heat map - top
Heat map - bottom
Heat map - bottom
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.8332525.226.63121.626.94024.717.95029.625.56322.523.98025.126.310020.125.812519.926.916020.836.920017.641.125017.647.431517.450.340016.153.650013.95563014.559.280016.161.3100014.567125014.471.5160013.672.1200013.973.5250014.576.1315014.477.8400014.877.6500014.776.8630014.873.6800014.971.91000015.170.9125001562.61600015.147.4SPL26.986N0.959.1median 14.9median 62.6Delta1.512.634.929.829.431.129.221.823.523.730.931.125.424.9242820.828.819.936.117.64417.745.515.650175416.153.215.256.314.656.415.354.914.861.414.263.713.263.314.861.91463.413.767.214.667.314.366.814.465.714.765.914.863.31560.514.952.526.776.30.836.8median 14.8median 60.51.46.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Tab M8 HDAmazon Fire HD 8 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Tab M8 HD audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.14 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.66 / 2.15 / 2.18 Watt
Carga midlight 2.48 / 3.49 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
4750 mAh
Alldocube M8 T801
5500 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Power Consumption
-72%
-213%
-142%
-21%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
0.97
-47%
3.4
-415%
2.1
-218%
0.62
6%
Idle Average *
2.15
3.26
-52%
5.1
-137%
3.74
-74%
2.68
-25%
Idle Maximum *
2.18
3.37
-55%
5.3
-143%
4.33
-99%
2.7
-24%
Load Average *
2.48
5.68
-129%
6
-142%
6.32
-155%
3.61
-46%
Load Maximum *
3.49
6.21
-78%
11.5
-230%
9.13
-162%
4
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
59h 41min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
28h 16min
Carga (máximo brilho)
6h 14min
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
4750 mAh
Alldocube M8 T801
5500 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-53%
-63%
-48%
-23%
Reader / Idle
3581
1168
-67%
1154
-68%
3132
-13%
H.264
1696
498
-71%
701
-59%
934
-45%
WiFi v1.3
1124
490
-56%
420
-63%
627
-44%
831
-26%
Load
374
316
-16%
298
-20%
342
-9%

Pro

+ O cartão micro-SD pode ser configurado como armazenamento interno
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ Design fino
+ Baixo peso
+ O fabricante incluiu software útil

Contra

- Desempenho médio da câmera
- Sem funções de carga rápida
- Alto-falante fraco

Verdict - good-quality Lenovo Tab M8

Review: Lenovo Tab M8 HD. Test unit provided by cyberport
Review: Lenovo Tab M8 HD. Test unit provided by cyberport

O Lenovo Tab M8 HD se apresentou como um tablet simples para navegar e assistir vídeos ocasionais. Sua duração da bateria é particularmente impressionante, assim como o design fino e o acabamento de alta qualidade. Nossa unidade de teste super com facilidade o Amazon Fire HD 8 nestas áreas. Seu desempenho é um pouco melhor do que o do tablet da Amazon também, embora o Tab M8 HD ainda não consiga acompanhar seus outros concorrentes.

O Tab M8 HD da Lenovo é uma boa alternativa no segmento de tablets acessíveis.

No entanto, não espere muito das câmeras do tablet. Seu armazenamento interno limitado também é um pouco decepcionante, embora esse problema possa ser resolvido formatando o cartão microSD como armazenamento interno. As opiniões podem diferir sobre a utilidade da ampla gama de software que a Lenovo incluiu neste tablet. O modo infantil definitivamente dá uma boa impressão e a gestão do tablet pode economizar tempo aos usuários menos experientes que procurarem no menu de configurações do Android. Usuários cujas expectativas não são particularmente altas ficarão muito satisfeitos com o Tab M8 HD.

Lenovo Tab M8 HD - 01/06/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 84%
Teclado
65 / 80 → 82%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
37 / 70 → 53%
Peso
86 / 40-88 → 96%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
4 / 78 → 5%
Desempenho da aplicação
43 / 92 → 47%
Temperatura
97%
Ruído
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
32 / 85 → 38%
Médio
68%
81%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Lenovo Tab M8 HD: Navegação e streaming por pouco dinheiro
Mike Wobker, 2020-01-28 (Update: 2020-02- 1)