Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MatePad Pro (5G) 10.8 - Uma alternativa Android para o Apple iPad Pro 11?

Não para Netflix e relaxar. O MatePad Pro oferece muitos recursos, um design moderno e materiais de alta qualidade. Mas será isso é o suficiente para enfrentar os melhores no campo dos tablets, o Apple iPad Pro e o Samsung Galaxy Tab S6? Nossa análise do tablet Huawei lança algumas dúvidas...
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto),
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (MatePad Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 990 8 x - 2.9 GHz, Cortex-A76/-A55
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G76 MP16
Memória
8192 MB 
Pantalha
10.8 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 280 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, native pen support, IPS, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 237 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: USB-Type-C, Card Reader: Nano Memory Card (até 256 GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Hall Effect Sensor, Gyroscope, Compass, Accelerometer, Color Temperature Sensor, USB-C, OTG, Miracast, Status LED, Reverse Charging
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G NR: N1/3/28/38/41/77/78/79, LTE FDD: B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/9/12/17/18/19/20/26/28/66 TD-LTE: B34/38/39/40/41/42, WCDMA: B1/2/4/5/6/8/19, GSM: B2/3/5/8, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.2 x 246 x 159
Bateria
7250 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.8
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Sistema de quatro alto-falantes, Teclado: Onscreen, Carregador de 20W (modular), adaptador de Type-C-para-3,5mm, cabo de dados Type-C, EMUI 10, 12 Meses Garantia, Wídevine L3, no GMS, fanless
peso
460 g, Suprimento de energia: 74 g
Preço
550 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
08/2020
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
460 g7.2 mm10.8"2560x1600
90 %
04/2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU
471 g5.9 mm11"2388x1668
87 %
10/2019
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
SD 855, Adreno 640
420 g5.7 mm10.5"2560x1600
83 %
06/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
467 g7 mm10.4"2000x1200

Size Comparison

247.6 mm 178.5 mm 5.9 mm 471 g246 mm 159 mm 7.2 mm 460 g244.5 mm 154.3 mm 7 mm 467 g244.5 mm 159.5 mm 5.7 mm 420 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1065 (1022min - 1104max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
679 (600min - 714max) MBit/s ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
613 (300min - 633max) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
609 (572min - 622max) MBit/s ∼57% -43%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
873 (750min - 946max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
828 (752min - 864max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
577 (534min - 612max) MBit/s ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
231 (114min - 380max) MBit/s ∼26% -74%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1064 (1022-1104)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø873 (750-946)
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei MatePad Pro
Huawei MatePad Pro
Huawei MatePad Pro
Huawei MatePad Pro
Huawei MatePad Pro
Huawei MatePad Pro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WideshotLowLightWideshot5x Zoom
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
52.4 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
50.6 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
62 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
46.6 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
72.2 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
77.7 ∆E
68.3 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8: 44.82 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 77.71 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8: 8.32 ∆E min: 3.96 - max: 13.2 ∆E
558
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 617 cd/m² Médio: 578.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.46 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 606 cd/m²
Contraste: 1894:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
IPS, 2388x1668, 11
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
TFT, 2000x1200, 10.4
Screen
22%
3%
-29%
Brightness middle
606
617
2%
446
-26%
503
-17%
Brightness
579
585
1%
445
-23%
477
-18%
Brightness Distribution
89
84
-6%
86
-3%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.32
0.36
-13%
0.29
9%
Contrast
1894
1714
-10%
1734
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.9
0.94
68%
2.7
7%
4.4
-52%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6
1.87
69%
5.4
10%
10.4
-73%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.3
1.4
67%
2.1
51%
7.5
-74%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.156 102%
2.05 107%
2.19 100%
CCT
7272 89%
6733 97%
6468 100%
7700 84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 23810 Hz ≤ 38 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 23810 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 38 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 23810 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17507 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (8892 - 12228, n=2)
10560 Points ∼24% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
9443 Points ∼22% +6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8892 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
8648 Points ∼20% -3%
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=45)
5745 Points ∼13% -35%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
13186 Points ∼23% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
12557 Points ∼22% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (11885 - 12280, n=2)
12083 Points ∼21% +2%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
11885 Points ∼21%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=62)
4764 Points ∼8% -60%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
4791 Points ∼71% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4261 Points ∼63% +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (3865 - 3898, n=2)
3882 Points ∼58% 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3865 Points ∼58%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=62)
1670 Points ∼25% -57%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Metal Score 5.1
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
9984 Points ∼98%
Average of class Tablet (9361 - 10011, n=3)
9785 Points ∼96%
Vulkan Score 5.1
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
3804 Points ∼3% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (3394 - 4043, n=2)
3719 Points ∼3% +10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3394 Points ∼3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
2519 Points ∼2% -26%
Average of class Tablet (623 - 4654, n=4)
2438 Points ∼2% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1081 Points ∼1% -68%
OpenCL Score 5.1
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (3756 - 4491, n=2)
4124 Points ∼3% +10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3756 Points ∼3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
2932 Points ∼2% -22%
Average of class Tablet (138 - 5353, n=5)
2292 Points ∼2% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1477 Points ∼1% -61%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Points ∼0% -100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
4707 Points ∼38% +63%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
3338 Points ∼27% +15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (2893 - 3062, n=2)
2978 Points ∼24% +3%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
2893 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
2815 Points ∼23% -3%
Average of class Tablet (498 - 4712, n=21)
1979 Points ∼16% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1207 Points ∼10% -58%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
1127 Points ∼70% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
940 Points ∼58% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
906 Points ∼56% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (759 - 781, n=2)
770 Points ∼48% +1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
759 Points ∼47%
Average of class Tablet (135 - 1127, n=21)
590 Points ∼36% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
345 Points ∼21% -55%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
10952 Points ∼72% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
10255 Points ∼67% +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
9615 Points ∼63% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (8636 - 10322, n=2)
9479 Points ∼62% +10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8636 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
5518 Points ∼36% -36%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12603, n=60)
4914 Points ∼32% -43%
Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
14307 Points ∼72% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
13142 Points ∼66% +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (10918 - 13947, n=2)
12433 Points ∼62% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
11644 Points ∼58% +7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
10918 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
6144 Points ∼31% -44%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 14982, n=96)
5329 Points ∼27% -51%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
3830 Points ∼94% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (3658 - 3870, n=2)
3764 Points ∼93% +3%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3658 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
3201 Points ∼79% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
2992 Points ∼74% -18%
Average of class Tablet (1152 - 3658, n=20)
2346 Points ∼58% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2076 Points ∼51% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
8659 Points ∼95% +108%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
8173 Points ∼90% +97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
5819 Points ∼64% +40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4156 - 6369, n=2)
5263 Points ∼58% +27%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4156 Points ∼46%
Average of class Tablet (400 - 8768, n=20)
2120 Points ∼23% -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1437 Points ∼16% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
6578 Points ∼94% +63%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
6280 Points ∼90% +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
4809 Points ∼69% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4036 - 5570, n=2)
4803 Points ∼69% +19%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4036 Points ∼58%
Average of class Tablet (469 - 6292, n=20)
1904 Points ∼27% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1543 Points ∼22% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
5277 Points ∼66% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4756 - 5576, n=2)
5166 Points ∼65% +9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4756 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
4447 Points ∼56% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
3919 Points ∼49% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2280 Points ∼29% -52%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 4756, n=61)
1950 Points ∼24% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
9356 Points ∼93% +115%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
9157 Points ∼91% +110%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
6750 Points ∼67% +55%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4356 - 6657, n=2)
5507 Points ∼55% +26%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4356 Points ∼43%
Average of class Tablet (99 - 9893, n=61)
2021 Points ∼20% -54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1528 Points ∼15% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
7986 Points ∼95% +79%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
7412 Points ∼88% +66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
5816 Points ∼69% +30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4467 - 6382, n=2)
5425 Points ∼65% +21%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4467 Points ∼53%
Average of class Tablet (129 - 7701, n=61)
1787 Points ∼21% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1649 Points ∼20% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4702 - 5133, n=2)
4918 Points ∼85% +5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4702 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
4436 Points ∼77% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4283 Points ∼74% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
3898 Points ∼68% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2283 Points ∼40% -51%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4702, n=67)
1823 Points ∼32% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
12694 Points ∼44% +188%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
10119 Points ∼35% +130%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
9470 Points ∼33% +115%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4405 - 7970, n=2)
6188 Points ∼22% +40%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4405 Points ∼15%
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=67)
3186 Points ∼11% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2021 Points ∼7% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
8823 Points ∼66% +97%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
7563 Points ∼56% +69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7470 Points ∼56% +67%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4472 - 7098, n=2)
5785 Points ∼43% +29%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4472 Points ∼33%
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=67)
2237 Points ∼17% -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2074 Points ∼15% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4895 Points ∼94% +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4096 - 4909, n=2)
4503 Points ∼86% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
4267 Points ∼82% +4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4096 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
3695 Points ∼71% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2178 Points ∼42% -47%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4201, n=77)
1832 Points ∼35% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
8299 Points ∼91% +88%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
8257 Points ∼90% +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
6128 Points ∼67% +38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4425 - 6478, n=2)
5452 Points ∼59% +23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4425 Points ∼48%
Average of class Tablet (55 - 8894, n=77)
1603 Points ∼17% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1472 Points ∼16% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
7157 Points ∼35% +65%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
6836 Points ∼34% +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
5346 Points ∼26% +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4334 - 6048, n=2)
5191 Points ∼26% +20%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4334 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1586 Points ∼8% -63%
Average of class Tablet (70 - 7098, n=79)
1481 Points ∼7% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4729 Points ∼90% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4056 - 4900, n=2)
4478 Points ∼85% +10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4056 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
3889 Points ∼74% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
3678 Points ∼70% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2199 Points ∼42% -46%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 4482, n=80)
1716 Points ∼33% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
12394 Points ∼87% +191%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
11488 Points ∼80% +170%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
9415 Points ∼66% +121%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4256 - 7671, n=2)
5964 Points ∼42% +40%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4256 Points ∼30%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 14283, n=80)
2291 Points ∼16% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2048 Points ∼14% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
9123 Points ∼95% +116%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
8010 Points ∼83% +90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
6992 Points ∼73% +66%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4215 - 6815, n=2)
5515 Points ∼57% +31%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4215 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2088 Points ∼22% -50%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 9238, n=81)
1838 Points ∼19% -56%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
42135 Points ∼49% +115%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
40279 Points ∼47% +106%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
34750 Points ∼40% +78%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
32384 Points ∼37% +66%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (19565 - 43459, n=2)
31512 Points ∼36% +61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
19797 Points ∼23% +1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
19565 Points ∼23%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51436, n=174)
14462 Points ∼17% -26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
221941 Points ∼41% +243%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
150281 Points ∼28% +132%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
107333 Points ∼20% +66%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
79572 Points ∼15% +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (64715 - 75073, n=2)
69894 Points ∼13% +8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
64715 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
25625 Points ∼5% -60%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=174)
25191 Points ∼5% -61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
110846 Points ∼45% +159%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
82937 Points ∼34% +94%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
73307 Points ∼30% +71%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
66452 Points ∼27% +55%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (42861 - 64626, n=2)
53744 Points ∼22% +25%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
42861 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
24052 Points ∼10% -44%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=175)
18873 Points ∼8% -56%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
203 fps ∼2% +50%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
200 fps ∼2% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
166 fps ∼1% +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (135 - 152, n=2)
144 fps ∼1% +7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
135 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
48 fps ∼0% -64%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=196)
37.1 fps ∼0% -73%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
119 fps ∼4% +98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
90 fps ∼3% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
60 fps ∼2% 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
60 fps ∼2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (60 - 60, n=2)
60 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
44 fps ∼1% -27%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=200)
23.9 fps ∼1% -60%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
122 fps ∼20% +91%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
100 fps ∼16% +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
97 fps ∼16% +52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (64 - 106, n=2)
85 fps ∼14% +33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
64 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
26 fps ∼4% -59%
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=130)
25.3 fps ∼4% -60%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
88 fps ∼24% +100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
59 fps ∼16% +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
56 fps ∼15% +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (44 - 60, n=2)
52 fps ∼14% +18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
44 fps ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
24 fps ∼7% -45%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=136)
17.5 fps ∼5% -60%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
86 fps ∼2% +110%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
72 fps ∼2% +76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
66 fps ∼1% +61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (41 - 56, n=2)
48.5 fps ∼1% +18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
41 fps ∼1%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=82)
22.7 fps ∼0% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
16 fps ∼0% -61%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
77 fps ∼2% +126%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
58 fps ∼2% +71%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (34 - 73, n=2)
53.5 fps ∼2% +57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
38 fps ∼1% +12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
34 fps ∼1%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=82)
15.1 fps ∼0% -56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
14 fps ∼0% -59%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
33 fps ∼21% +154%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
30 fps ∼19% +131%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (13 - 26, n=2)
19.5 fps ∼12% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
16 fps ∼10% +23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
13 fps ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=32)
10.3 fps ∼7% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
5.8 fps ∼4% -55%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
22 fps ∼9% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
20 fps ∼8% +18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (17 - 19, n=2)
18 fps ∼7% +6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
17 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
15 fps ∼6% -12%
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=32)
9.95 fps ∼4% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
3.6 fps ∼1% -79%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
51 fps ∼25% +200%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
47 fps ∼23% +176%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (17 - 40, n=2)
28.5 fps ∼14% +68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
24 fps ∼12% +41%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
17 fps ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=32)
15.5 fps ∼8% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
9.7 fps ∼5% -43%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
56 fps ∼10% +37%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
54 (20min) fps ∼9% +32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (41 - 49, n=2)
45 fps ∼8% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
42 fps ∼7% +2%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
41 fps ∼7%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=32)
26.6 fps ∼5% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
10 fps ∼2% -76%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
50 fps ∼11% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
50 fps ∼11% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
40 fps ∼9% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (38 - 41, n=2)
39.5 fps ∼9% +4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
38 fps ∼9%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=58)
16.3 fps ∼4% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
10 fps ∼2% -74%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
45 fps ∼17% +114%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
44 fps ∼17% +110%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (21 - 34, n=2)
27.5 fps ∼10% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
23 fps ∼9% +10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
21 fps ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=58)
10.2 fps ∼4% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
9.6 fps ∼4% -54%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
712218 Points ∼95% +74%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
595466 Points ∼79% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
498708 Points ∼66% +22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (409039 - 483224, n=2)
446132 Points ∼59% +9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
409039 Points ∼54%
Average of class Tablet (78450 - 751846, n=16)
324526 Points ∼43% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
177197 Points ∼24% -57%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
1514 Points ∼74% +47%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
1270 Points ∼62% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
1249 Points ∼61% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (1032 - 1462, n=2)
1247 Points ∼61% +21%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
1032 Points ∼51%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=123)
772 Points ∼38% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Graphics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
11567 Points ∼40% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
10781 Points ∼37% +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (8775 - 10112, n=2)
9444 Points ∼33% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
9372 Points ∼32% +7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8775 Points ∼30%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=124)
2440 Points ∼8% -72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2154 Points ∼7% -75%
Memory
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
7945 Points ∼90% +18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
6751 Points ∼76%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (6130 - 6751, n=2)
6441 Points ∼73% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
5617 Points ∼63% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
4497 Points ∼51% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1670 Points ∼19% -75%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 6751, n=124)
1304 Points ∼15% -81%
System
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
10002 Points ∼61% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
9478 Points ∼58% +15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (8215 - 9309, n=2)
8762 Points ∼53% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
8360 Points ∼51% +2%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8215 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
4657 Points ∼28% -43%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=124)
2712 Points ∼16% -67%
Overall
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
6072 Points ∼72% +28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4738 - 5389, n=2)
5064 Points ∼60% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
4915 Points ∼58% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
4842 Points ∼57% +2%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4738 Points ∼56%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=123)
1426 Points ∼17% -70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
637 Points ∼8% -87%

Legend

 
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 990, ARM Mali-G76 MP16, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Apple A12Z Bionic, Apple A12Z Bionic GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Samsung Exynos 9611, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, ARM Mali-G77 MP11, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
124.503 Points ∼100% +126%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
66.971 Points ∼54% +22%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 126, n=19)
61.7 Points ∼50% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (55.1 - 65.9, n=2)
60.5 Points ∼49% +10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
55.115 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
27.459 Points ∼22% -50%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
274.4 Points ∼100% +171%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
118.05 Points ∼43% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (101 - 115, n=2)
108 Points ∼39% +7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
101.24 Points ∼37%
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=108)
61 Points ∼22% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
50.255 Points ∼18% -50%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
141 Points ∼100% +45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (97 - 119, n=2)
108 Points ∼77% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
104 Points ∼74% +7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
97 Points ∼69%
Average of class Tablet (13 - 182, n=43)
74.8 Points ∼53% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
54 Points ∼38% -44%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chome 80)
125 runs/min ∼100% +96%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (63.9 - 74.1, n=2)
69 runs/min ∼55% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
66.2 runs/min ∼53% +4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
63.9 runs/min ∼51%
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 139, n=28)
55 runs/min ∼44% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
29.2 runs/min ∼23% -54%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
42372 Points ∼100% +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
24654 Points ∼58% +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (19885 - 23568, n=2)
21727 Points ∼51% +9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
19885 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
9415 Points ∼22% -53%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=193)
7803 Points ∼18% -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=205)
8823 ms * ∼100% -276%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
4871.7 ms * ∼55% -108%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
2344.9 ms * ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
2175.7 ms * ∼25% +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (1963 - 2345, n=2)
2154 ms * ∼24% +8%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
646.4 ms * ∼7% +72%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 LiteAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-13%
-34%
-8%
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
71.72 (NM Card)
54.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-24%
65.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
59.8 (30.7 - 71.7, n=5)
-17%
50.2 (14 - 73.8, n=72)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.42 (NM Card)
70.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
78.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
70.6 (34.7 - 82.5, n=5)
-14%
68.1 (17.6 - 87.7, n=72)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
262.42
170.16
-35%
195.78
-25%
183 (24.8 - 272, n=19)
-30%
11.5 (0.13 - 262, n=224)
-96%
Random Read 4KB
224.61
191.65
-15%
119.84
-47%
206 (169 - 265, n=19)
-8%
25.9 (1.04 - 230, n=224)
-88%
Sequential Write 256KB
398.96
522.31
31%
219.34
-45%
536 (387 - 756, n=19)
34%
57 (2.04 - 732, n=224)
-86%
Sequential Read 256KB
1788.66
1415.55
-21%
483.72
-73%
1595 (1398 - 1789, n=19)
-11%
149 (6.75 - 1789, n=224)
-92%
PUBG Compare
0102030405060Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø59.8 (59-60)
; Balanced: Ø39.9 (36-41)
; HD: Ø39.9 (39-41)
Real Racing 3
0102030405060Tooltip
: Ø59.6 (50-60)
Carga Máxima
 29.2 °C28.3 °C32.6 °C 
 28.2 °C28.3 °C32.6 °C 
 25.9 °C26.5 °C31.9 °C 
Máximo: 32.6 °C
Médio: 29.3 °C
27.6 °C28.2 °C29.6 °C
27.9 °C28.3 °C28.3 °C
28 °C27 °C27.1 °C
Máximo: 29.6 °C
Médio: 28 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
Huawei MatePad Pro (5G) - heat map
Huawei MatePad Pro (5G) - heat map
Huawei MatePad Pro (5G) - heat map
Huawei MatePad Pro (5G) - heat map
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.840.22519.630.43123.924.74024.326.15030.535.56318.724.68020.431.910018.642.112517.551.816019.561.820019.260.925016.46731515.269.240014.269.650014.771.663013.874.580014.675.2100014.172.1125013.573.2160014.470.3200013.971.6250013.871.6315013.874400014.769.7500014.272630014.469.9800014.966.6100001566.31250015.149.41600015.341.3SPL26.583.8N0.863.4median 14.7median 69.7Delta0.85.642.340.440.741.131.138.634.34334.751.928.946.423.840.926.249.42253.720.757.32157.218.657.117.762.517.268.31970.51771.515.27217.369.715.468.618.564.615.958.715.165.614.464.314.860.115.161.215.363.815.664.915.961.416.161.216.65760.869.667.428.378.515.224.219.31.145.8median 16.6median 62.51.65.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MatePad Pro 10.8Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.39 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.98 / 5.66 / 5.69 Watt
Carga midlight 6.96 / 6.98 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
7250 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
7040 mAh
Power Consumption
-36%
11%
12%
Idle Minimum *
1.98
1.3
34%
1.96
1%
1.21
39%
Idle Average *
5.66
3.5
38%
2.8
51%
4.24
25%
Idle Maximum *
5.69
5.6
2%
2.82
50%
4.34
24%
Load Average *
6.96
12.5
-80%
5.31
24%
6.99
-0%
Load Maximum *
6.98
19.2
-175%
11.91
-71%
8.79
-26%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
31h 17min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 9min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 53min
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
7250 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
7040 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
-7%
10%
Reader / Idle
1877
2001
7%
1276
-32%
2120
13%
H.264
909
936
3%
872
-4%
950
5%
WiFi v1.3
891
902
1%
556
-38%
792
-11%
Load
233
197
-15%
340
46%
309
33%

Pro

+ Design moderno e belo acabamento
+ Painel brilhante de 1600p
+ Memória veloz
+ Alto-falantes muito bons
+ Bons recursos
+ Potente CPU...

Contra

- ...com uma GPU fraca
- Sem conector de 3,5 mm
- Sem leitor de digitais
- PWM
- Sem fonte de alimentação de 40 W de fábrica
- Afogamento
- (sem GMS)

Veredicto - O MatePad Pro é um tablet de nicho premium

In review: Huawei MatePad Pro. Test device provided by TradingShenzhen.
In review: Huawei MatePad Pro. Test device provided by TradingShenzhen.

Um veredicto geral sobre o último tablet Huawei é quase impossível, dada a falta de serviços móveis do Google e a falta de uma certificação Widevine L1 - preferências individuais e comportamento de uso pessoal são essenciais aqui. Os amantes de multimídia precisam estar cientes de que a reprodução de conteúdo protegido por DRM é muito ruim. Esclareceremos se isso acaba afetando a versão alemã assim que o exemplar de teste com o software alemão chegar até nós.

A falta de serviços do Google torna muito difícil usar os aplicativos do Google e causa problemas com muitos aplicativos de terceiros. Aplicativos de fontes externas podem ser instalados, mas isso apresenta um risco de segurança para usuários inexperientes, e até mesmo usuários experientes às vezes não entenderão a maneira como os arquivos APK de fontes externas irão interagir com seu sistema.

Apesar disso, o MatePad Pro oferece um sistema de alto-falantes com bom som, longa duração e desempenho decente. Além disso, o tablet da Huawei tem uma construção muito boa e recursos raramente encontrados no mercado de tablets, como carregamento sem fio e carregamento sem fio reverso.

Mas o hardware do MatePad Pro não está isento de críticas. Dada a faixa de preço, o tablet deve vir com uma opção de desbloqueio biométrico seguro e uma fonte de alimentação de 40 watts suficientemente poderosa. Além disso, um tablet premium pode ter uma tela OLED ou uma tela IPS com uma alta taxa de atualização à la iPad Pro. A decisão de ir com a tecnologia LC e seus pontos fracos (turvação, ângulos de visão), em combinação com o buraco perfurado (que cria sombras), não vai deixar os fãs da tela felizes. 

O MatePad Pro é um belo tablet, mas no geral não é recomendável para a maioria. 

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 - 07/06/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
87 / 98 → 89%
Teclado
69 / 80 → 87%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
56 / 70 → 80%
Peso
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
48 / 78 → 62%
Desempenho da aplicação
78 / 92 → 84%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
88 / 91 → 97%
Camera
64 / 85 → 76%
Médio
80%
88%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MatePad Pro (5G) 10.8 - Uma alternativa Android para o Apple iPad Pro 11?
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-08- 9 (Update: 2020-08-10)