Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019): Um tablet Samsung econômico com grandes deficiências

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/07/2020

An enjoyable tablet with restrictions. O Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) é um tablet Android compacto no segmento de preços de nível de entrada. No entanto, seus preços acessíveis significam que a Samsung teve que fazer alguns compromissos. Você pode descobrir quais são eles em nossa análise do Galaxy Tab A 8.0.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Galaxy Tab A Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 504
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
8 polegadas 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 189 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, TFT, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 21 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (até 512 GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, micro USB, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 210 x 124.4
Bateria
5100 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Virtual, Cabo micro USB, fones, fonte alimentação modular, Samsung UI, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
345 g, Suprimento de energia: 45 g
Preço
150 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
80%01/2020Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
429, Adreno 504
345 g8 mm8"1280x800
81%01/2020Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320
305 g8.2 mm8"1280x800
79%03/2019Alldocube M8 T801
MT6797X, Mali-T880 MP4
345 g8.48 mm8"1920x1200
78%07/2019Amazon Fire 7 2019
MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720 MP2
286 g9.6 mm7"1024x600
79%12/2019Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3
504 g9.8 mm10.1"1920x1200
81%10/2018Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2
475 g7.7 mm10.1"1920x1200
74%09/2018Trekstor SurfTab B10
MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz, Mali-T720 MP2
505 g9.8 mm10.1"1280x800
75%Lenovo Tab M7
MT8321, Mali-400 MP2
236 g8.2 mm7"1024x600

Size Comparison

262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 504 g243 mm 172 mm 9.8 mm 505 g243.4 mm 162.2 mm 7.7 mm 475 g215 mm 122.9 mm 8.48 mm 345 g210 mm 124.4 mm 8 mm 345 g199 mm 129 mm 8.2 mm 305 g192 mm 115 mm 9.6 mm 286 g176 mm 103 mm 8.2 mm 236 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mali-G72 MP3, MT8183, 32 GB eMMC Flash
321 (min: 302, max: 327) MBit/s ∼100% +218%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
294 (min: 256, max: 307) MBit/s ∼92% +191%
Alldocube M8 T801
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash
235 MBit/s ∼73% +133%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
101 (min: 86, max: 107) MBit/s ∼31%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
97 (min: 20, max: 109) MBit/s ∼30% -4%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash
86.8 (min: 35, max: 106) MBit/s ∼27% -14%
Lenovo Tab M7
Mali-400 MP2, MT8321, 16 GB eMMC Flash
59.7 (min: 41, max: 56) MBit/s ∼19% -41%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼16% -49%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mali-G72 MP3, MT8183, 32 GB eMMC Flash
299 (min: 279, max: 310) MBit/s ∼100% +160%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
271 (min: 183, max: 335) MBit/s ∼91% +136%
Alldocube M8 T801
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash
195 MBit/s ∼65% +70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
115 (min: 109, max: 121) MBit/s ∼38%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
91 (min: 44, max: 103) MBit/s ∼30% -21%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash
86.4 (min: 31, max: 99) MBit/s ∼29% -25%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼18% -53%
Lenovo Tab M7
Mali-400 MP2, MT8321, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.2 (min: 34, max: 61) MBit/s ∼16% -58%
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø101 (86-107)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø114 (109-121)
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 - Loop
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Photo
29.6 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.4 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290: 47.07 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 93.69 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
7 ∆E
7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290: 6.06 ∆E min: 1.67 - max: 12.28 ∆E
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
A photo of our test chart in the dark
397
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 397 cd/m² Médio: 372 cd/m² Minimum: 3.04 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 377 cd/m²
Contraste: 1300:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
85.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.13
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
TFT, 1280x800, 8
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Alldocube M8 T801
IPS, 1920x1200, 8
Amazon Fire 7 2019
IPS, 1024x600, 7
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Trekstor SurfTab B10
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Lenovo Tab M7
IPS, 1024x600, 7
Screen
19%
-20%
9%
2%
-26%
-13%
-5%
Brightness middle
377
379
1%
317.5
-16%
391
4%
449
19%
514
36%
223
-41%
447
19%
Brightness
372
346
-7%
320
-14%
385
3%
425
14%
492
32%
211
-43%
449
21%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
94
8%
75
-14%
89
2%
80
-8%
81
-7%
86
-1%
Black Level *
0.29
0.21
28%
0.5
-72%
0.15
48%
0.6
-107%
0.96
-231%
0.22
24%
0.25
14%
Contrast
1300
1805
39%
635
-51%
2607
101%
748
-42%
535
-59%
1014
-22%
1788
38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.1
3.8
38%
6.12
-0%
6.3
-3%
3.1
49%
5.42
11%
6.2
-2%
7.1
-16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.9
7.5
31%
13.72
-26%
19.3
-77%
6.4
41%
9.84
10%
13
-19%
20.6
-89%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.6
5
24%
5.8
12%
6.1
8%
3.8
42%
6.5
2%
6.2
6%
8.1
-23%
Gamma
2.13 103%
2.23 99%
2.12 104%
2.22 99%
2.09 105%
2.216 99%
2.17 101%
2.07 106%
CCT
7861 83%
7514 87%
7633 85%
8069 81%
7202 90%
6780 96%
7022 93%
8255 79%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13634 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).
Geekbench 5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Tablet (136 - 2360, n=3)
922 Points ∼1% +578%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
136 Points ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
136 Points ∼0% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (375 - 4661, n=9)
1480 Points ∼9% +168%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
552 Points ∼3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
552 Points ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
538 Points ∼3% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (134 - 1114, n=9)
491 Points ∼37% +192%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
168 Points ∼13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
168 Points ∼13% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
161 Points ∼12% -4%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
5056 Points ∼41% +18%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4946 Points ∼40% +16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
4719 Points ∼38% +11%
Alldocube M8 T801
4695 Points ∼38% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (4267 - 4631, n=2)
4449 Points ∼36% +4%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 9615, n=47)
4339 Points ∼35% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4267 Points ∼35%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
3361 Points ∼27% -21%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
3071 Points ∼25% -28%
Lenovo Tab M7
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Work performance score
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7019 Points ∼36% +17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6284 Points ∼32% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (5986 - 6227, n=2)
6107 Points ∼31% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5986 Points ∼31%
Alldocube M8 T801
5984 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 11644, n=84)
4849 Points ∼25% -19%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
4685 Points ∼24% -22%
Lenovo Tab M7
2719 Points ∼14% -55%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Points ∼0% -100%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2567 Points ∼16% +44%
Average of class Tablet (1786 - 2992, n=7)
2307 Points ∼15% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (1786 - 1849, n=2)
1818 Points ∼12% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1786 Points ∼11%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (404 - 5819, n=7)
1513 Points ∼10% +229%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
955 Points ∼7% +108%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
460 Points ∼3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (209 - 460, n=2)
335 Points ∼2% -27%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (493 - 4809, n=7)
1472 Points ∼10% +168%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1110 Points ∼8% +102%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
550 Points ∼4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (260 - 550, n=2)
405 Points ∼3% -26%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2966 Points ∼37% +157%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 3919, n=47)
1738 Points ∼22% +50%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1632 Points ∼20% +41%
Alldocube M8 T801
1372 Points ∼17% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (1155 - 1233, n=2)
1194 Points ∼15% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1155 Points ∼14%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
939 Points ∼12% -19%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Points ∼0% -100%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (99 - 6993, n=47)
1759 Points ∼21% +738%
Alldocube M8 T801
1108 Points ∼13% +428%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
986 Points ∼12% +370%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
399 Points ∼5% +90%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
253 Points ∼3% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
210 Points ∼3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (210 - 210, n=2)
210 Points ∼3% 0%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Points ∼0% -100%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (129 - 5816, n=47)
1543 Points ∼19% +500%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1158 Points ∼14% +351%
Alldocube M8 T801
1157 Points ∼14% +350%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
480 Points ∼6% +87%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
302 Points ∼4% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
257 Points ∼3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (257 - 257, n=2)
257 Points ∼3% 0%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Points ∼0% -100%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2963 Points ∼58% +159%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4700, n=55)
1667 Points ∼32% +46%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1648 Points ∼32% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (1145 - 1195, n=2)
1170 Points ∼23% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1145 Points ∼22%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
943 Points ∼18% -18%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
858 Points ∼17% -25%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
768 Points ∼15% -33%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=55)
3069 Points ∼11% +813%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1455 Points ∼5% +333%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
602 Points ∼2% +79%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
458 Points ∼2% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (336 - 393, n=2)
365 Points ∼1% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
336 Points ∼1%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
201 Points ∼1% -40%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
194 Points ∼1% -42%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=55)
2060 Points ∼15% +381%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1641 Points ∼12% +283%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
701 Points ∼5% +64%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
517 Points ∼4% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (428 - 462, n=2)
445 Points ∼3% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points ∼3%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
242 Points ∼2% -43%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
233 Points ∼2% -46%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2832 Points ∼58% +138%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1744 Points ∼36% +47%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 3695, n=63)
1688 Points ∼34% +42%
Alldocube M8 T801
1654 Points ∼34% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (1188 - 1207, n=2)
1198 Points ∼24% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1188 Points ∼24%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points ∼18% -24%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Points ∼0% -100%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (55 - 6128, n=63)
1369 Points ∼19% +795%
Alldocube M8 T801
995 Points ∼14% +550%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
990 Points ∼14% +547%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
233 Points ∼3% +52%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
193 Points ∼3% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
153 Points ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (152 - 153, n=2)
153 Points ∼2% 0%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Points ∼0% -100%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (70 - 5346, n=65)
1275 Points ∼18% +571%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1157 Points ∼16% +509%
Alldocube M8 T801
1092 Points ∼15% +475%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
279 Points ∼4% +47%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
241 Points ∼3% +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
190 Points ∼3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (189 - 190, n=2)
190 Points ∼3% 0%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Points ∼0% -100%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2818 Points ∼58% +139%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1758 Points ∼36% +49%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 3678, n=68)
1578 Points ∼32% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (1178 - 1235, n=2)
1207 Points ∼25% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1178 Points ∼24%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points ∼18% -23%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
891 Points ∼18% -24%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
793 Points ∼16% -33%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 10647, n=68)
1917 Points ∼17% +427%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1434 Points ∼13% +294%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
427 Points ∼4% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (364 - 399, n=2)
382 Points ∼3% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
364 Points ∼3%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
172 Points ∼2% -53%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
99 Points ∼1% -73%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
81 Points ∼1% -78%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1610 Points ∼19% +276%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 6997, n=69)
1566 Points ∼19% +266%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
484 Points ∼6% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (428 - 470, n=2)
449 Points ∼5% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points ∼5%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
210 Points ∼3% -51%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
125 Points ∼1% -71%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
101 Points ∼1% -76%
Lenovo Tab M7
Points ∼0% -100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
18829 Points ∼22% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (15709 - 16518, n=2)
16114 Points ∼19% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
15709 Points ∼18%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14822 Points ∼17% -6%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51374, n=161)
13506 Points ∼16% -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
13310 Points ∼15% -15%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
10290 Points ∼12% -34%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
9926 Points ∼11% -37%
Alldocube M8 T801
9771 Points ∼11% -38%
Lenovo Tab M7
7561 Points ∼9% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=161)
20616 Points ∼4% +199%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
19615 Points ∼4% +184%
Alldocube M8 T801
14192 Points ∼3% +106%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11419 Points ∼2% +66%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7658 Points ∼1% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6897 Points ∼1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (6895 - 6897, n=2)
6896 Points ∼1% 0%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
5562 Points ∼1% -19%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
5144 Points ∼1% -25%
Lenovo Tab M7
2468 Points ∼0% -64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
19435 Points ∼8% +147%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 106954, n=162)
16234 Points ∼7% +106%
Alldocube M8 T801
12895 Points ∼5% +64%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11791 Points ∼5% +50%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8580 Points ∼4% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (7879 - 7920, n=2)
7900 Points ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
7879 Points ∼3%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
6194 Points ∼3% -21%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
5761 Points ∼2% -27%
Lenovo Tab M7
2902 Points ∼1% -63%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Alldocube M8 T801
39 fps ∼0% +255%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
38 fps ∼0% +245%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=184)
33.3 fps ∼0% +203%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
20 fps ∼0% +82%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14 fps ∼0% +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
11 fps ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (11 - 11, n=2)
11 fps ∼0% 0%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
10 fps ∼0% -9%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
9.3 fps ∼0% -15%
Lenovo Tab M7
4.4 fps ∼0% -60%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
37 fps ∼1% +118%
Alldocube M8 T801
35 fps ∼1% +106%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
22 fps ∼1% +29%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=188)
21.7 fps ∼1% +28%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
21 fps ∼1% +24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
19 fps ∼1% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
17 fps ∼1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (17 - 17, n=2)
17 fps ∼1% 0%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
15 fps ∼0% -12%
Lenovo Tab M7
9.8 fps ∼0% -42%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=118)
22.6 fps ∼4% +371%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
20 fps ∼4% +317%
Alldocube M8 T801
19 fps ∼3% +296%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.8 fps ∼2% +83%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
6.6 fps ∼1% +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4.8 fps ∼1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (4.7 - 4.8, n=2)
4.75 fps ∼1% -1%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
3.8 fps ∼1% -21%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
3.6 fps ∼1% -25%
Lenovo Tab M7
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
21 fps ∼6% +121%
Alldocube M8 T801
19 fps ∼5% +100%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=124)
15.5 fps ∼4% +63%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
12 fps ∼3% +26%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
12 fps ∼3% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
9.5 fps ∼3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (8.9 - 9.5, n=2)
9.2 fps ∼3% -3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.6 fps ∼2% -9%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
6.9 fps ∼2% -27%
Lenovo Tab M7
fps ∼0% -100%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=70)
20.5 fps ∼0% +541%
Alldocube M8 T801
13 fps ∼0% +306%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
12 fps ∼0% +275%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.4 fps ∼0% +69%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.3 fps ∼0% +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.2 fps ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (3.1 - 3.2, n=2)
3.15 fps ∼0% -2%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
2.4 fps ∼0% -25%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
2.2 fps ∼0% -31%
Lenovo Tab M7
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=70)
13.2 fps ∼0% +91%
Alldocube M8 T801
12 fps ∼0% +74%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
12 fps ∼0% +74%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8.5 fps ∼0% +23%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
8.4 fps ∼0% +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6.9 fps ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (6.7 - 6.9, n=2)
6.8 fps ∼0% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.3 fps ∼0% -23%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
4.9 fps ∼0% -29%
Lenovo Tab M7
fps ∼0% -100%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=19)
10.4 fps ∼7% +420%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
4.3 fps ∼3% +115%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.9 fps ∼2% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
2 fps ∼1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
2 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1.7 fps ∼1% -15%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
fps ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=19)
10.9 fps ∼7% +1263%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2.6 fps ∼2% +225%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1.1 fps ∼1% +38%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
0.85 fps ∼1% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
0.8 fps ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.8 fps ∼0% 0%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
fps ∼0% -100%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=19)
15.2 fps ∼8% +390%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼4% +139%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.6 fps ∼2% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.1 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
2.7 fps ∼1% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (2 - 3.1, n=2)
2.55 fps ∼1% -18%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
fps ∼0% -100%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=19)
29.3 fps ∼7% +1624%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.6 fps ∼2% +347%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
2.8 fps ∼1% +65%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.3 fps ∼1% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (1.7 - 1.8, n=2)
1.75 fps ∼0% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.7 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
fps ∼0% -100%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=46)
14.7 fps ∼4% +717%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼2% +311%
Alldocube M8 T801
7.3 fps ∼2% +306%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3.2 fps ∼1% +78%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1.9 fps ∼0% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.8 fps ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (1.8 - 1.8, n=2)
1.8 fps ∼0% 0%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=46)
8.82 fps ∼3% +132%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼3% +95%
Alldocube M8 T801
7.3 fps ∼3% +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.8 fps ∼1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (3.6 - 3.8, n=2)
3.7 fps ∼1% -3%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
3.6 fps ∼1% -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3 fps ∼1% -21%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M7
fps ∼0% -100%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
929 Points ∼46% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
809 Points ∼40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (790 - 809, n=2)
800 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=114)
760 Points ∼37% -6%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
756 Points ∼37% -7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
742 Points ∼36% -8%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
698 Points ∼34% -14%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Lenovo Tab M7
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=115)
2245 Points ∼8% +361%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1550 Points ∼5% +218%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
836 Points ∼3% +72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
487 Points ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (481 - 487, n=2)
484 Points ∼2% -1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
472 Points ∼2% -3%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
338 Points ∼1% -31%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
309 Points ∼1% -37%
Lenovo Tab M7
143 Points ∼0% -71%
Memory
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2380 Points ∼32% +89%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1948 Points ∼26% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (1258 - 1285, n=2)
1272 Points ∼17% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1258 Points ∼17%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1151 Points ∼15% -9%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5617, n=115)
1121 Points ∼15% -11%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
745 Points ∼10% -41%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
595 Points ∼8% -53%
Lenovo Tab M7
464 Points ∼6% -63%
System
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
3827 Points ∼23% +97%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3080 Points ∼19% +58%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=115)
2502 Points ∼15% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (1945 - 2020, n=2)
1983 Points ∼12% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1945 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1539 Points ∼9% -21%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
1225 Points ∼7% -37%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
1137 Points ∼7% -42%
Lenovo Tab M7
946 Points ∼6% -51%
Overall
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1903 Points ∼23% +93%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1389 Points ∼16% +41%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=114)
1310 Points ∼16% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (987 - 997, n=2)
992 Points ∼12% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
987 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
891 Points ∼11% -10%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
681 Points ∼8% -31%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
213 Points ∼3% -78%
Lenovo Tab M7
157 Points ∼2% -84%
AnTuTu v8
UX
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
15291 Points ∼18% +40%
Average of class Tablet (10934 - 16414, n=3)
14213 Points ∼17% +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
10934 Points ∼13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
10934 Points ∼13% 0%
MEM
Average of class Tablet (25641 - 30664, n=3)
27917 Points ∼28% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
27445 Points ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
27445 Points ∼27% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
25641 Points ∼26% -7%
GPU
Average of class Tablet (4118 - 10799, n=3)
6567 Points ∼3% +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4783 Points ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
4783 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4118 Points ∼2% -14%
CPU
Average of class Tablet (34075 - 41316, n=3)
36893 Points ∼20% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
35288 Points ∼19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
35288 Points ∼19% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
34075 Points ∼19% -3%
Total Score
Average of class Tablet (78450 - 99193, n=3)
85589 Points ∼15% +9%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
79125 Points ∼14% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
78450 Points ∼14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
78450 Points ∼14% 0%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Qualcomm Adreno 504, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M8 HD Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alldocube M8 T801 MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire 7 2019 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Trekstor SurfTab B10 MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M7 Mediatek MT8321, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (16.1 - 110, n=9)
52.9 Points ∼100% +229%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
25.621 Points ∼48% +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
16.087 Points ∼30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (14.6 - 16.1, n=2)
15.3 Points ∼29% -5%
Amazon Fire 7 2019 (Silk Browser 70.3.1)
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=92)
53 Points ∼100% +111%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
45.743 Points ∼86% +82%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
30.352 Points ∼57% +21%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
29.598 Points ∼56% +18%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
25.645 Points ∼48% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (25.1 - 25.1, n=2)
25.1 Points ∼47% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
25.067 Points ∼47%
Trekstor SurfTab B10 (Chrome 72)
16.697 Points ∼32% -33%
Amazon Fire 7 2019 (Silk Browser 70.3.1)
16.224 Points ∼31% -35%
Lenovo Tab M7 (Chrome 79)
11.198 Points ∼21% -55%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (13 - 182, n=27)
68.7 Points ∼100% +115%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
52 Points ∼76% +63%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
42 Points ∼61% +31%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
34 Points ∼49% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (32 - 36, n=2)
34 Points ∼49% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
32 Points ∼47%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
23 Points ∼33% -28%
Lenovo Tab M7 (Chrome 79)
13 Points ∼19% -59%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 132, n=17)
47.2 runs/min ∼100% +250%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
27.7 runs/min ∼59% +105%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
15.49 runs/min ∼33% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (13.5 - 15.6, n=2)
14.5 runs/min ∼31% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
13.5 runs/min ∼29%
Amazon Fire 7 2019 (Silk Browser 70.3.1)
11.11 runs/min ∼24% -18%
Lenovo Tab M7 (Chrome 79)
5.68 runs/min ∼12% -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
8665 Points ∼100% +102%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=178)
6938 Points ∼80% +61%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
5909 Points ∼68% +38%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
5412 Points ∼62% +26%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
4378 Points ∼51% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (4297 - 4392, n=2)
4345 Points ∼50% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
4297 Points ∼50%
Trekstor SurfTab B10 (Chrome 72)
2972 Points ∼34% -31%
Amazon Fire 7 2019 (Silk Browser 70.3.1)
2871 Points ∼33% -33%
Lenovo Tab M7 (Chrome 79)
1712 Points ∼20% -60%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Tab M7 (Chrome 79)
19212.4 ms * ∼100% -80%
Trekstor SurfTab B10 (Chrome 72)
15571 ms * ∼81% -46%
Amazon Fire 7 2019 (Silk Browser 70.3.1)
13853 ms * ∼72% -30%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
10893.8 ms * ∼57% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
10654.6 ms * ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 (10433 - 10655, n=2)
10544 ms * ∼55% +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
9248.9 ms * ∼48% +13%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=189)
9175 ms * ∼48% +14%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
7429.3 ms * ∼39% +30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
4979.3 ms * ∼26% +53%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290Lenovo Tab M8 HDAlldocube M8 T801Amazon Fire 7 2019Amazon Fire HD 10 2019Huawei MediaPad M5 liteTrekstor SurfTab B10Lenovo Tab M7Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-41%
-47%
15%
61%
-39%
-46%
-17%
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
69.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
32.05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-54%
51.96 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-26%
72.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
62.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
35.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-50%
51.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=154)
-27%
47.2 (14 - 73.8, n=60)
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
87.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
59.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-32%
77.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
83.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
83.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
38.97 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-55%
70.1 (8.2 - 96.5, n=154)
-20%
65.2 (17.6 - 87.7, n=60)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
16.89
15.84
-6%
10.01
-41%
5.83
-65%
23.28
38%
77.25
357%
8.43
-50%
11.96
-29%
18.2 (0.75 - 77.3, n=197)
8%
7.02 (0.13 - 170, n=211)
-58%
Random Read 4KB
57.77
77.44
34%
19.5
-66%
24.98
-57%
74.99
30%
73.47
27%
16.96
-71%
31.39
-46%
40 (3.59 - 117, n=197)
-31%
20.9 (1.04 - 192, n=211)
-64%
Sequential Write 256KB
108.54
79.55
-27%
103.02
-5%
77.33
-29%
180.1
66%
82.56
-24%
70.5
-35%
53.11
-51%
95.4 (14.8 - 189, n=197)
-12%
44.4 (2.04 - 522, n=211)
-59%
Sequential Read 256KB
291.87
297.09
2%
142.8
-51%
164.85
-44%
266.16
-9%
308.15
6%
108.99
-63%
155.68
-47%
237 (25.8 - 452, n=197)
-19%
121 (6.75 - 1416, n=211)
-59%
PUBG Mobile
0102030Tooltip
: Ø22.8 (16-27)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010Tooltip
: Ø6.53 (4-9)
Carga Máxima
 26.5 °C26 °C31 °C 
 27 °C25.4 °C33.3 °C 
 25.5 °C26.4 °C31.2 °C 
Máximo: 33.3 °C
Médio: 28 °C
25.2 °C25.2 °C25.5 °C
25.3 °C26.7 °C26.9 °C
25.5 °C26.4 °C26.5 °C
Máximo: 26.9 °C
Médio: 25.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.7 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
Heatmap of the front of the device under load
Heatmap of the front of the device under load
Heatmap of the back of the device under load
Heatmap of the back of the device under load
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.832.82525.225.33121.622.64024.7285029.631.86322.529.78025.128.110020.128.312519.931.416020.851.720017.655.425017.662.331517.462.840016.165.950013.965.763014.56880016.172.1100014.574.1125014.473.5160013.670.7200013.973.1250014.574.5315014.477.3400014.881.2500014.783.2630014.884800014.980.71000015.178.7125001566.11600015.156.1SPL26.990.4N0.981.7median 14.9median 70.7Delta1.57.529.83325.226.621.626.924.717.929.625.522.523.925.126.320.125.819.926.920.836.917.641.117.647.417.450.316.153.613.95514.559.216.161.314.56714.471.513.672.113.973.514.576.114.477.814.877.614.776.814.873.614.971.915.170.91562.615.147.426.9860.959.1median 14.9median 62.61.512.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Tab M8 HD audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.62 / 2.68 / 2.7 Watt
Carga midlight 3.61 / 4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Alldocube M8 T801
5500 mAh
Amazon Fire 7 2019
2980 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Trekstor SurfTab B10
6000 mAh
Lenovo Tab M7
3500 mAh
Power Consumption
15%
-178%
-30%
-60%
-109%
-136%
1%
Idle Minimum *
0.62
0.66
-6%
3.4
-448%
1.1
-77%
1.14
-84%
2.8
-352%
2.2
-255%
0.85
-37%
Idle Average *
2.68
2.15
20%
5.1
-90%
2.77
-3%
3.71
-38%
3.3
-23%
3.94
-47%
2.4
10%
Idle Maximum *
2.7
2.18
19%
5.3
-96%
2.79
-3%
3.74
-39%
3.9
-44%
4
-48%
2.42
10%
Load Average *
3.61
2.48
31%
6
-66%
4.5
-25%
5.26
-46%
5.2
-44%
9.35
-159%
3.17
12%
Load Maximum *
4
3.49
13%
11.5
-188%
5.61
-40%
7.68
-92%
7.2
-80%
10.92
-173%
3.69
8%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
52h 12min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 34min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 42min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Alldocube M8 T801
5500 mAh
Amazon Fire 7 2019
2980 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Trekstor SurfTab B10
6000 mAh
Lenovo Tab M7
3500 mAh
Battery Runtime
35%
-49%
-52%
-2%
-10%
-38%
-52%
Reader / Idle
3132
3581
14%
1008
-68%
1691
-46%
2162
-31%
H.264
934
1696
82%
536
-43%
1480
58%
934
0%
WiFi v1.3
831
1124
35%
420
-49%
462
-44%
950
14%
852
3%
515
-38%
402
-52%
Load
342
374
9%
169
-51%
228
-33%
299
-13%

Pro

+ Bom acabamento
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ GPS preciso
+ Um sólido painel TFT para o preço

Contra

- Tela de baixa resolução
- É difícil limpar a parte traseira
- Conectividade pobre
- Apenas 32 GB de armazenamento e 2 GB de RAM
- Desempenho fraco do sistema
- GPU fraco
- Wi-Fi bastante lento
- Câmeras inúteis
- Sem USB Type-C

Verdict - The Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) lacks performance

The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) tablet review.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) tablet review.

O Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) é um tablet sólido que oferece um pacote geral adequado pelo preço de cerca de €150 (~$168). O tablet possui uma duração decente da bateria, alto-falantes impressionantes e um painel TFT convincente.

O acessível Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) não é uma escolha sensata para usuários exigentes.

Nossos testes também revelaram algumas deficiências. Os patches de segurança de nossa unidade de teste não estão atualizados, por exemplo. Enquanto o tablet tem desempenho lento de Wi-Fi. A RAM e o armazenamento também são um pouco limitados, apesar de ter um leitor de cartão microSD a bordo. Além disso, a Samsung incluiu o desatualizado padrão micro USB em seu tablet de 8 polegadas.

Acima de tudo, o fraco desempenho é um fardo pesado na vida cotidiana. Um SoC Snapdragon 429 combinado com 2 GB de RAM se esforça na maioria das tarefas, o que não é de surpreender, considerando o nível de desempenho da One UI. A omissão de um método de autenticação biométrica em um dispositivo lançado em 2019 também é incompreensível. A Samsung nem sequer oferece o simples reconhecimento facial em 2D usando a câmera frontal do Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019). Também não podemos entender o dispositivo com a certificação Widevine Nível 3.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 - 12/30/2019 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
77 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
67 / 80 → 84%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
35 / 70 → 50%
Peso
86 / 40-88 → 95%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
80%
Desempenho do jogos
3 / 78 → 4%
Desempenho da aplicação
42 / 92 → 46%
Temperatura
95%
Ruído
100%
Audio
78 / 91 → 85%
Camera
32 / 85 → 37%
Médio
67%
80%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019): Um tablet Samsung econômico com grandes deficiências
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-01- 7 (Update: 2020-02- 2)