Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Análise do XMG Neo 17 E24 - Laptop rápido para jogos com resfriamento a água opcional

Laptop RTX 4080 e teclado mecânico.

Com o XMG Neo 17, o senhor obtém um gamer puro-sangue que pode ser equipado com os componentes mais rápidos do mercado. Um teclado mecânico Cherry e um sistema externo de resfriamento a água também estão disponíveis como opções, o que reduz não apenas as temperaturas, mas também o ruído de fundo.
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Thunderbolt Windows

Veredicto - O XMG Neo 17 se concentra no desempenho dos jogos

O XMG Neo 17 se apresenta no teste como um poderoso laptop para jogos com um foco óbvio no desempenho máximo dos componentes. O Intel Core i9-14900HX é usado como processador em todas as configurações, enquanto as GPUs dedicadas da Nvidia podem ter overclock. O resultado é um dos notebooks RTX 4080 mais rápidos que testamos até hoje. Isso proporciona desempenho suficiente para o rápido painel QHD de 240 Hz, que também é muito adequado para jogos. O circuito para o resfriamento a água Oasis externo opcional foi aprimorado e agora também cobre o processador. O resultado são temperaturas significativamente mais baixas e, portanto, um nível de ruído mais baixo durante os jogos.

O gamer também faz bonito em outras áreas: há portas suficientes disponíveis, o gabinete é de boa qualidade e o teclado mecânico Cherry opcional é muito bom, mas também muito barulhento. A capacidade de RAM/SSD também pode ser configurada e a atualização posterior não é problema. O notebook de 17 polegadas é relativamente grande e não é leve, pesando pouco menos de 3 kg. A unidade de resfriamento faz um bom trabalho, mesmo sem o resfriamento a água Oasis, mas as ventoinhas fazem muito barulho durante os jogos e o senhor deve usar fones de ouvido.

Em termos de preço, mais de 3.000 euros não é, obviamente, uma pechincha, mas isso se deve principalmente à GPU GeForce. Se o senhor estiver procurando um gamer puro-sangue e também quiser aproveitar o resfriamento a água, o XMG Neo 17 é definitivamente uma boa escolha.

Pro

+ Tela QHD+ (16:10, 240 Hz, G-Sync)
+ alto desempenho do sistema
+ carcaça de metal resistente
+ Optimus avançado
+ 2x SO-DIMM/2x M.2-2280
+ Composto térmico de metal líquido
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ teclado mecânico
+ resfriamento a água opcional disponível

Contra

- ventoinhas barulhentas ao tocar
- ruído ocasional da bobina
- teclado mecânico barulhento
- sem Wi-Fi 7

Preço e disponibilidade

O Schenker Neo 17 E24 pode ser configurado e encomendado diretamente da Bestware. O preço inicial é de 1.949 euros para a configuração com o laptop RTX 4060 e 2.924 euros para o laptop RTX 4080.

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Image
Model / Review
Geizhals
Weight
Height
Display
1.
84.6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memória, 1024 GB SSD
Listenpreis 3189€2.9 kg27 mm17.00"
2560x1600
178 PPI
IPS
2.
89.2% v7 (old)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memória, 1024 GB SSD
Listenpreis 4000 Euro2.9 kg36 mm17.00"
2560x1600
178 PPI
IPS
3.
80.4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memória, 1024 GB SSD
Listenpreis 1900€2.8 kg30.1 mm17.30"
2560x1440
170 PPI
IPS
4.
85.2% v7 (old)
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memória, 2048 GB SSD
Listenpreis 4500 USD3.4 kg24.9 mm17.30"
3840x2160
255 PPI
IPS
5.
88.3% v7 (old)
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memória, 2048 GB SSD
Listenpreis 3600 USD3 kg23 mm17.00"
2560x1600
178 PPI
IPS

Com o XMG Neo 17 E24, a Schenker oferece um poderoso notebook para jogos de 17 polegadas com um painel QHD de 240 Hz (G-Sync). O processador é sempre o Core i9-14900HX da Intel e, para a placa de vídeo, o senhor pode escolher entre a Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 e todos os outros modelos até o laptop GeForce Laptop RTX 4090. A memória RAM/SSD pode ser amplamente configurada e, além de um teclado mecânico, o sistema externo de resfriamento a água Oasis também está disponível como opção, o que pode aumentar significativamente a capacidade de resfriamento do laptop.

Nosso dispositivo de teste está equipado com o laptop dedicado GeForce Laptop RTX 4080 32 GB de RAM e um SSD de 1 TB da Samsung, o que aumenta o preço, incluindo o teclado mecânico Cherry, para 3.182 euros (preço base de 1.948 euros). Também analisamos alguns benchmarks do Neo 17 com o laptop RTX 4090 em combinação com o sistema de resfriamento a água Oasis (199 euros).

Especificações

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 (XMG Neo 17 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 140 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU - 12 MB VRAM, Análises do: 2385 MHz, Memoría: 2375 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 565.90, Advanced Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, max. 64 GB
Pantalha
17.00 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 178 PPI, NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, Brilhante: não, 240 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Disco rígido
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, 864 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27 x 381.7 x 272.8
Bateria
99 Wh, 6450 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, mechanical, Cherry MX ULP Tactile, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 330W PSU, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.893 kg, Suprimento de energia: 974 g
Preço
3189 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Estojos e equipamentos

Já estamos familiarizados com o chassi de metal preto e a unidade de base emborrachada do Medion Erazer Beastque é baseado no mesmo barebone. Há uma faixa de LED na parte traseira e um logotipo XMG na tampa, mas, fora isso, não há adesivos irritantes do fabricante. A estabilidade geral é muito boa, mas com um peso de pouco menos de 2,9 kg e uma altura de 2,7 cm, o Neo 17 também não é leve. A tampa inferior do case pode ser removida com relativa facilidade (os dois parafusos da conexão de resfriamento de água também devem ser soltos) e o senhor pode acessar todos os componentes importantes, incluindo a RAM, 2x SSD M.2-2280 ou o módulo WLAN.

A gama de conexões é muito ampla, pois, além de portas USB suficientes, Thunderbolt 4 e HDMI também estão disponíveis. O leitor de cartões atinge taxas de transferência médias em conjunto com nossa placa de referência (Angelbird AV Pro V60) e a webcam de 1080p tira fotos suficientemente nítidas. O módulo Wi-Fi 6E da Intel (AX211) atinge taxas de transferência muito boas em conjunto com nosso roteador de referência, mas o padrão Wi-Fi 7 mais recente ainda não é suportado.

Comparação de tamanho

398 mm 278 mm 30.1 mm 2.8 kg396 mm 278 mm 24.9 mm 3.4 kg383 mm 272 mm 36 mm 2.9 kg381.7 mm 272.8 mm 27 mm 2.9 kg380 mm 298 mm 23 mm 3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Esquerda: trava Kensington, USB-A 3.2 Gen.2 (10 Gbit/s), saída para fone de ouvido, entrada para microfone
Esquerda: trava Kensington, USB-A 3.2 Gen.2 (10 Gbit/s), saída para fone de ouvido, entrada para microfone
À direita: Leitor de cartão SD, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s)
À direita: Leitor de cartão SD, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s)
Traseira: conexão para resfriamento a água Oasis (autovedante), USB-C 4.0 com Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbit/s, modo DisplayPort ALT 1.4, compatível com G-Sync, Power Delivery)
Traseira: conexão para resfriamento a água Oasis (autovedante), USB-C 4.0 com Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbit/s, modo DisplayPort ALT 1.4, compatível com G-Sync, Power Delivery)
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
77.2 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s 0%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
61.4 MB/s -20%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120 MB/s +49%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90 MB/s +12%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
88.7 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
80.5 MB/s
Networking
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1679 (min: 1606) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1715 (min: 1650) MBit/s ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
636 (min: 501) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1650 (min: 1031) MBit/s ∼96%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
Realtek RTL8852BE
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
850 (min: 782) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
930 (min: 466) MBit/s ∼54%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
793 (min: 386) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1214 (min: 1011) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
691 (min: 640) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1227 (min: 1158) MBit/s ∼84%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1145 (min: 867) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1194 (min: 839) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1192 (min: 941) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1465 (min: 1277) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1679 (1606-1733)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1715 (1650-1733)
ColorChecker
11.1 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
17 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24: 13.28 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 22.57 ∆E

Dispositivos de entrada - Teclado mecânico Cherry

O Neo 17 está disponível com um teclado de membrana convencional com 4 zonas de iluminação ou com um teclado mecânico com iluminação individual das teclas (custo adicional de 95 euros). Isso também está instalado em nosso dispositivo de teste, com interruptores táteis da Cherry (MX ULP) sendo usados. Eles fazem jus ao seu nome e oferecem uma sensação de digitação muito tátil e precisa, mas os botões também são muito barulhentos. Isso definitivamente deve ser levado em conta ao fazer sua escolha. O grande ClickPad de vidro (15 x 9,5 cm) funciona sem problemas.

Dispositivos de entrada
Dispositivos de entrada
Iluminação do teclado
Iluminação do teclado

Tela - QHD com 240 Hz

Estrutura de subpixel
Estrutura de subpixel
Sangramento mínimo da luz de fundo
Sangramento mínimo da luz de fundo

A tela IPS de 17 polegadas com superfície fosca oferece uma resolução de 2.560 x 1.600 pixels (16:10) e é muito adequada para jogos graças aos tempos de resposta rápidos e à frequência de 240 Hz. A qualidade subjetiva da imagem também é muito boa. O PWM não é usado e não há grandes problemas com halos.

O brilho médio é de cerca de 400 cd/m², embora o nível de preto seja um pouco mais alto, com 0,39. Isso resulta em uma taxa de contraste máxima de pouco mais de 1.000:1, o que é ótimo. O painel deve ser ainda mais brilhante em ambientes externos. A calibração de fábrica já é muito boa, mas podemos otimizar ainda mais a tela com a nossa calibração. O perfil correspondente está disponível para download gratuito na caixa à direita. Juntamente com a cobertura sRGB completa, o painel também é adequado para a edição de imagens/vídeos.

425
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
NE170QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 425 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 400.8 cd/m² Minimum: 19.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 412 cd/m²
Contraste: 1056:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
BOE0B67, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
BOE CQ NE173QUM-NY1, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3", 144 Hz
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
AU Optronics B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz
Display
-0%
-3%
20%
22%
Display P3 Coverage
69
68.1
-1%
66.2
-4%
95.9
39%
97.6
41%
sRGB Coverage
98.4
99.5
1%
95.5
-3%
99.8
1%
99.9
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.6
69
-1%
68.1
-2%
84.2
21%
86.5
24%
Response Times
4%
-17%
-40%
38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.1 ?(5.9, 6.2)
11.7 ?(5.7, 6)
3%
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-19%
14.8 ?(7.2, 7.6)
-22%
4.2 ?(1.9, 2.3)
65%
Response Time Black / White *
7.2 ?(3, 4.2)
6.9 ?(2.8, 4.1)
4%
8.3 ?(3.5, 4.8)
-15%
11.4 ?(6.1, 5.3)
-58%
6.4 ?(2.8, 3.6)
11%
PWM Frequency
Screen
14%
-9%
-25%
-51%
Brightness middle
412
422
2%
363
-12%
544.6
32%
398.6
-3%
Brightness
401
388
-3%
341
-15%
507
26%
384
-4%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
84
-5%
77
-12%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.39
0.42
-8%
0.38
3%
0.48
-23%
0.46
-18%
Contrast
1056
1005
-5%
955
-10%
1135
7%
867
-18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
1.42
21%
1.74
3%
3.38
-88%
4.05
-125%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.9
1.97
49%
5.39
-38%
7.13
-83%
8.68
-123%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.9
0.7
22%
1.43
-59%
1.03
-14%
1.02
-13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
1.2
52%
1.3
48%
4.3
-72%
6.5
-160%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.078 106%
2.235 98%
2.42 91%
2.11 104%
CCT
6676 97%
6581 99%
6346 102%
7356 88%
7518 86%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / 10%
-10% / -9%
-15% / -18%
3% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN Grayscale (Escala de cinza)
CalMAN Grayscale (Escala de cinza)
Saturação de CalMAN
Saturação de CalMAN
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN escala de cinza calibrada
CalMAN escala de cinza calibrada
CalMAN saturação calibrada
CalMAN saturação calibrada
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrado
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrado

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.9 ms rise
↘ 6.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Ao sol
Ao sol
Ao ar livre (dia claro, sem luz solar direta)
Ao ar livre (dia claro, sem luz solar direta)
Ângulos de visão
Ângulos de visão

Desempenho - Raptor Lake-HX

O Neo 17 é equipado exclusivamente com o Intel Core i9-14900HX. 16 GB de RAM são instalados como padrão, mas até 96 GB são possíveis graças a dois slots SO-DIMM (sobretaxa de 260 euros).

 
 
 

Condições de teste

O XMG Neo 17 oferece vários perfis de energia, que resumimos na tabela a seguir. Usamos o modo Overboost para nossos benchmarks e medições, pois a diferença de ruído em comparação com o modo Enthusiast é pequena. O fabricante também oferece o site Deep Dive para obter mais informações técnicas básicas sobre o Neo 17 e os perfis de energia.

Perfil de energia CPU TDP CB R23 Multi GPU TDP Time Spy Gráficos CP 2077 Ultra QHD Volume máximo do ventilador
Balanceado 45 W 14.899 pontos 130 W 10.778 pontos 73,9 FPS 43,1 dB(A)
Enthusiast 75 W 22.027 pontos 150 W 18.021 pontos 78,6 FPS 49,9 dB(A)
Overboost 160/140 W 31.740 pontos 175 W 19.155 pontos 80,7 FPS 51,9 dB(A)

Processador - Core i9-14900HX

O Intel Core i9-14900HX ainda é um dos processadores móveis mais rápidos e é improvável que isso mude muito com os próximos chips Arrow Lake. O fornecimento de energia do processador é excelente, pois ele pode consumir 160 watts por períodos curtos e 140 watts continuamente. Para o usuário, isso significa um desempenho muito alto e constante. No entanto, é preciso esperar perdas significativas no modo de bateria, pois a CPU pode consumir no máximo 35 watts, o que corresponde a uma redução de 65% no desempenho nos testes de vários núcleos. Outros benchmarks de CPU estão disponíveis em nossa seção de tecnologia.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

02605207801040130015601820208023402600286031203380364039004160442046804940Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4773 (4743.83-4806.54)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3224 (3189.54-3263.11)
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2557 (2454.44-2575)
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4467 (4379.24-4648.46)
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4856 (4818.7-5120.98)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
87.3 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US -2!
Intel Core i9-13950HX
84.9 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
81.2 pt
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
79.6 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
75 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
66.3 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
53.4 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
32664 (29653.8min - 32664.5max) Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
31740 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
31323 (28572.5min - 31322.6max) Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17078 - 36249, n=36)
28815 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22238 Points -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
21812 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
16494 Points -48%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2233 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2227 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1720 - 2245, n=36)
2149 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2113 Points -5%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2100 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=187, last 2 years)
1887 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1623 Points -27%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
12574 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
12083 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11543 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6579 - 13832, n=36)
10958 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8495 Points -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)
8300 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6440 Points -47%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
856 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
855 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (657 - 859, n=36)
824 Points -4%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
804 Points -6%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
803 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)
725 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
681 Points -20%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
5121 (4818.7min - 5120.98max) Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4807 (4743.83min - 4806.54max) Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4648 (4379.24min - 4648.46max) Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 5589, n=37)
4420 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)
3417 Points -29%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3263 Points -32%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2575 (2454.44min - 2575max) Points -46%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
317 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
314 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (247 - 323, n=36)
305 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
303 Points -4%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
300 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)
278 Points -12%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
269 Points -15%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
200 Seconds * -92%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)
170.8 Seconds * -64%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
143 Seconds * -38%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (91 - 206, n=36)
121.2 Seconds * -17%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
105 Seconds * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
104 Seconds *
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
101 Seconds * +3%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
127033 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
124376 MIPS
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
121036 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (66769 - 136645, n=36)
111340 MIPS -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
92386 MIPS -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)
85207 MIPS -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
64759 MIPS -48%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7340 MIPS +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7095 MIPS
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
7064 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (5452 - 7545, n=36)
7021 MIPS -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6658 MIPS -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)
6305 MIPS -11%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
5197 MIPS -27%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18572 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18291 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13158 - 19665, n=36)
17312 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
15849 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=110, last 2 years)
14195 Points -24%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12697 Points -32%
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3077 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3074 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2419 - 3129, n=36)
2967 Points -3%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2874 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=110, last 2 years)
2650 Points -14%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2550 Points -17%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
21853 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21616 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 23194, n=36)
19403 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17082 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)
14993 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
11864 Points -45%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8618 Points -60%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2168 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2116 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2097 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=36)
2093 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)
1892 Points -11%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1765 Points -17%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1669 Points -21%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
34.5 fps +3%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
33.8 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
33.4 fps
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (16.8 - 38.9, n=36)
29.3 fps -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23.7 fps -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)
23.5 fps -30%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
19.4 fps -42%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
77 s * -104%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years)
47.3 s * -25%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
46.8 s * -24%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (31.4 - 85.1, n=36)
43.3 s * -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
42.8 s * -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
37.7 s *
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
37.6 s * -0%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4935 sec * -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)
0.438 sec * -16%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=36)
0.3853 sec * -2%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3845 sec * -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.3823 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3772 sec *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3717 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4807 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
288 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
317 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
856 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
12083 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
31740 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2233 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
130 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1731 Points
Ajuda
Performance Rating
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
97.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
94.5 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
94.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
85.7 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
73.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
72.1 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
28521 KRay/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
27883 KRay/s -2%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
26984 KRay/s -5%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
26816 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13098 - 33474, n=35)
24776 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)
21786 KRay/s -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20114 KRay/s -29%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
144410 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
141829 Points -2%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138436 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (67573 - 166040, n=35)
124243 Points -14%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
113402 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)
106398 Points -26%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
103901 Points -28%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7026 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6946 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6905 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3589 - 7979, n=35)
6137 MB/s -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
4905 MB/s -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)
4884 MB/s -30%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4814 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144137 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
143407 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
140103 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148966, n=35)
138178 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
132613 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)
116767 Points -19%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116204 Points -19%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
16799 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
16696 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16403 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (10475 - 18517, n=35)
15240 Points -9%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15101 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
13541 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)
13223 Points -21%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
70219 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
69911 Points 0%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67115 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (32543 - 83662, n=35)
61114 Points -13%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60582 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)
53561 Points -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
50393 Points -28%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
241777 MB/s +79%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=35)
139720 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
134957 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
134830 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)
109083 MB/s -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
99333 MB/s -26%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87760 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2069 MB/s +5%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2037 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1979 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1054 - 2292, n=35)
1792 MB/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1443 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)
1359 MB/s -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1080 MB/s -45%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15367 KRay/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15367 KRay/s
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
14781 KRay/s -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14253 KRay/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6809 - 18349, n=35)
13343 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)
11734 KRay/s -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
10990 KRay/s -28%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
51118 MPixel/s +4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
50323 MPixel/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
49116 MPixel/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
49089 MPixel/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (23903 - 54702, n=35)
46809 MPixel/s -5%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41300 MPixel/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)
40082 MPixel/s -18%

Desempenho do sistema

O Neo 17 também impressiona nos benchmarks sintéticos do sistema, embora a concorrência seja geralmente muito próxima. No uso diário, isso significa um sistema extremamente responsivo, embora haja um breve travamento ao trocar a placa de vídeo. No entanto, isso é completamente normal e pode ser evitado desativando completamente a iGPU.

PCMark 10 / Score
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
8963 Points +3%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8771 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8694 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (7703 - 9223, n=6)
8687 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7800 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)
7791 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (11255 - 11825, n=6)
11523 Points +2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11488 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11348 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
10871 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)
10841 Points -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10499 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
11759 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11057 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10474 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (6662 - 11410, n=6)
10243 Points -7%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10202 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)
9900 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
15287 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (14211 - 16246, n=6)
15275 Points +7%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
15221 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
14211 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)
12077 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
12023 Points -15%
CrossMark / Overall
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
2238 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1992 - 2334, n=6)
2157 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2144 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1992 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years)
1905 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1899 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1531 Points -23%
CrossMark / Productivity
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
2113 Points +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2070 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1812 - 2204, n=6)
2013 Points +11%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1846 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1812 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years)
1805 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1488 Points -18%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (2327 - 2500, n=6)
2401 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2397 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
2341 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2323 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years)
2090 Points -13%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2035 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1683 Points -30%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
2327 Points +53%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1520 - 2254, n=6)
1938 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
1874 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years)
1704 Points +12%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1681 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1520 Points
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1255 Points -17%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
332 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
332 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (310 - 345, n=6)
328 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
326 Points -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
315 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years)
304 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
275 Points -17%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
314 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (300 - 321, n=6)
311 Points -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
308 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
295 Points -6%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
291 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=148, last 2 years)
267 Points -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
564 ms * -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=175, last 2 years)
503 ms * -14%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
474 ms * -8%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
467 ms * -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (437 - 446, n=6)
441 ms * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
440 ms *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
437 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8694 pontos
Ajuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77961 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77775 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77283 MB/s -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76328 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (38028 - 83392, n=35)
74992 MB/s -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67615 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)
65188 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
86296 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85378 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85340 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43306 - 87568, n=35)
81259 MB/s -6%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80139 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)
69056 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60660 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86590 MB/s +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77302 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77260 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
76482 MB/s -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76442 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (37146 - 80589, n=35)
72271 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)
66928 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
101 ns * -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)
94 ns * -14%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85.5 ns * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (76.1 - 105, n=35)
84.8 ns * -3%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84.4 ns * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
82.3 ns *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80.9 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

Latências de DPC

Em nosso teste de latência padronizado (navegação na Internet, reprodução de 4K no YouTube, carga da CPU), o sistema com a versão testada do BIOS mostra limitações ao usar aplicativos de áudio em tempo real.

LatencyMon - Visão geral
LatencyMon - Visão geral
LatencyMon - Driver
LatencyMon - Driver
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3493.7 μs * -66%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2103.7 μs *
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1962 μs * +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
1305.5 μs * +38%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
1123.4 μs * +47%

* ... smaller is better

Armazenamento em massa

Dois slots M.2-2280
Dois slots M.2-2280

O Neo 17 oferece dois slots M.2-2280 rápidos que são conectados via PCIe 4.0 x4. A versão de 1 TB do Samsung 990 Pro está instalada no dispositivo de teste, que atinge taxas de transferência rápidas e é um dos SSDs mais rápidos do mercado. Além disso, o desempenho permanece completamente estável, mesmo sob carga constante. Após a inicialização, o usuário tem 864 GB à sua disposição. Outros benchmarks de SSDs podem ser encontrados aqui.

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7106 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6110 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 495 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 517 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 56.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.5 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 480 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1102 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
91.1 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
62.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
61.9 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
59.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
51.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
51.3 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
34.8 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4233 (4196.61min - 4232.61max) MB/s +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3470 MB/s +7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2556 - 4234, n=19)
3283 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3241 (3226.94min - 3241.38max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3238 (3056.39min - 3237.58max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2760 (2709.34min - 2760.41max) MB/s -15%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
2672 (2652.21min - 2671.88max) MB/s -18%
seq write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
9307 (5304.83min - 9307.21max) MB/s +159%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3598 - 5842, n=19)
4816 MB/s +34%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4387 (4345.42min - 4387.07max) MB/s +22%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3940 (3577.56min - 3940.13max) MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3807 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3598 (3547.33min - 3597.6max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2905 (2803.32min - 2905.46max) MB/s -19%
seq q8 t1 read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
12029 (6621.31min - 12029.1max) MB/s +71%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7085 (6214.7min - 7085.23max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7052 (5956.79min - 7051.62max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4958 - 7148, n=19)
6979 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
6929 (6183.66min - 6928.97max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6313 MB/s -10%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4998 (4326.58min - 4998max) MB/s -29%
seq q8 t1 write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
11581 (11375.7min - 11581max) MB/s +69%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6863 (6837.3min - 6863.35max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6898, n=19)
6796 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
5740 (5704.67min - 5740.32max) MB/s -16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5219 (5185.74min - 5219.39max) MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4851 MB/s -29%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3187 (3173.56min - 3187.38max) MB/s -54%
4k q1 t1 read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
95.9 (94.45min - 95.94max) MB/s +69%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 99, n=19)
77.1 MB/s +36%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
76.2 (75.22min - 76.22max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
56.8 (56.66min - 56.81max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
54.5 (53.38min - 54.47max) MB/s -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
44.2 (43.54min - 44.16max) MB/s -22%
4k q1 t1 write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
397 (385.91min - 396.86max) MB/s +196%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
324 (322.91min - 324.37max) MB/s +142%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (133.9 - 343, n=19)
235 MB/s +76%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
228 (227.02min - 228.2max) MB/s +70%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
223 MB/s +67%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
133.9 (132.36min - 133.89max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
97.6 (96.73min - 97.61max) MB/s -27%
4k q32 t16 read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
6172 (6083.33min - 6171.85max) MB/s +510%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3653 (3636.8min - 3652.63max) MB/s +261%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3467 (3436.61min - 3466.79max) MB/s +243%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4926, n=19)
3398 MB/s +236%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2568 MB/s +154%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1011 (977.69min - 1010.73max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
822 (788.59min - 821.86max) MB/s -19%
4k q32 t16 write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
4485 (4443.23min - 4484.95max) MB/s +788%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3447 (3336.65min - 3446.75max) MB/s +583%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=19)
2584 MB/s +412%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2354 (2252.28min - 2353.53max) MB/s +366%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2130 MB/s +322%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
505 (499.39min - 505.04max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
395 (366.26min - 394.87max) MB/s -22%
AS SSD
Score Total
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
13854 Points +105%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
8462 Points +25%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10591, n=19)
8285 Points +22%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8252 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6773 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)
6745 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4108 Points -39%
Score Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
4345 Points +158%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3177 Points +89%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3033 Points +80%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=19)
2874 Points +71%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)
2446 Points +45%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1683 Points
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1270 Points -25%
Score Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
7208 Points +67%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4313 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4852, n=19)
4041 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3948 Points -8%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3511 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)
3112 Points -28%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2264 Points -48%
Seq Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
7812.91 MB/s +39%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5638.22 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5630 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
5459.84 MB/s -3%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4362 - 5760, n=19)
5223 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)
4938 MB/s -12%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3717 MB/s -34%
Seq Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
9485.67 MB/s +149%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3376 - 5651, n=19)
4740 MB/s +25%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4458.9 MB/s +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3914.76 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3804 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)
3759 MB/s -1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1997 MB/s -48%
4K Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
89.1 MB/s +69%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
82.84 MB/s +57%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (52.7 - 90.9, n=19)
71.9 MB/s +36%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
68.69 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)
65.3 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
52.7 MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
51.5 MB/s -2%
4K Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
350.79 MB/s +62%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
237.11 MB/s +10%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (172.3 - 306, n=19)
221 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
216 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)
212 MB/s -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
194.62 MB/s -10%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
176.5 MB/s -18%
4K-64 Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
3474.56 MB/s +225%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2544.4 MB/s +138%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2404.46 MB/s +125%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (787 - 3182, n=19)
2235 MB/s +109%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)
1881 MB/s +76%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1068 MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
846 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
5908.55 MB/s +59%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3717 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1592 - 4090, n=19)
3352 MB/s -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3319.37 MB/s -11%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2870.73 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)
2526 MB/s -32%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1888 MB/s -49%
Access Time Read
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.062 ms * -244%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
0.057 ms * -217%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)
0.05538 ms * -208%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.035 ms * -94%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.018 - 0.074, n=19)
0.03384 ms * -88%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
0.02 ms * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.018 ms *
Access Time Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
0.1 ms * -488%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.064 ms * -276%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)
0.04826 ms * -184%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.021 ms * -24%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.012 - 0.053, n=19)
0.01995 ms * -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.017 ms *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
0.016 ms * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6971 (6313.69-6994.9)

Placa de vídeo

GPU-Z Nvidia GeForce Laptop RTX 4080
GPU-Z Nvidia GeForce Laptop RTX 4080

Em nosso dispositivo de teste, a placa dedicada Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 dedicado com 12 GB de VRAM está instalado. A placa de vídeo pode consumir no máximo 175 watts (150 watts de TGP + 25 watts de Dynamic Boost), de modo que o Neo 17 pode utilizar totalmente a GPU. Graças à comutação de gráficos Advanced Optimus, o desempenho em jogos é excelente e o laptop RTX 4080 é totalmente suficiente para a resolução QHD nativa. Além disso, o desempenho permanece completamente estável, mesmo sob carga constante.

Ao comparar os dados da CPU/GPU em nosso loop do Cyberpunk 2077, a vantagem do resfriamento externo a água fica muito clara, pois as temperaturas da CPU/GPU são cerca de 20 °C mais baixas, razão pela qual as ventoinhas também precisam trabalhar menos.

No modo de bateria, o consumo de energia da GPU é limitado a 52 watts, e é por isso que o desempenho da GPU é cerca de 53% menor. Outros benchmarks de GPU estão disponíveis aqui.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
98.5 pt
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
97.7 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
95.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
90.6 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
89.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
 
84.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
64.6 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
63.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
66129 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
64540 Points +4%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
63191 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
62207 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
59348 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (45199 - 63128, n=24)
56791 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43857 Points -29%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
43236 Points -30%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
46191 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
44366 Points +6%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
42663 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
42022 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (33058 - 45220, n=22)
40862 Points -3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
31765 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years)
31443 Points -25%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
22104 Points +15%
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
21074 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20806 Points +9%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
19299 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19155 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (13282 - 19663, n=22)
17777 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=187, last 2 years)
13142 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12536 Points -35%
3DMark 11 Performance
45722 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
34851 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
18980 pontos
Ajuda
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen 17-db0079ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
22 Seconds * -69%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=176, last 2 years)
20.9 Seconds * -61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (13 - 20, n=21)
<