Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2020): Ajustes finos no carro-chefe
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.3 % | 05/2020 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU | 641 g | 5.9 mm | 12.90" | 2732x2048 | |
| 90.2 % | 11/2018 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 A12X Bionic, A12X Bionic GPU | 633 g | 5.9 mm | 12.90" | 2732x2048 | |
| 90.4 % | 04/2020 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU | 471 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 | |
| 88.1 % | 03/2020 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 790 g | 8.5 mm | 12.30" | 2736x1824 | |
| 87.8 % | 10/2019 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 SD 855, Adreno 640 | 420 g | 5.7 mm | 10.50" | 2560x1600 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 625 cd/m²
Contraste: 1330:1 (Preto: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.90 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.90 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 IPS, 2388x1668, 11.00 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 15% | 16% | 5% | -47% | |
| Brightness middle | 625 | 632 1% | 617 -1% | 435 -30% | 446 -29% |
| Brightness | 599 | 605 1% | 585 -2% | 422 -30% | 445 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 84 -3% | 90 3% | 86 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.32 32% | 0.36 23% | 0.32 32% | |
| Contrast | 1330 | 1975 48% | 1714 29% | 1359 2% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.1 15% | 0.94 28% | 1.18 9% | 2.7 -108% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.7 | 2.4 11% | 1.87 31% | 2.27 16% | 5.4 -100% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.7 6% | 1.4 22% | 1.12 38% | 2.1 -17% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% | 2.156 102% | 2.3 96% | 2.05 107% |
| CCT | 6765 96% | 6794 96% | 6733 97% | 6502 100% | 6468 100% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.49 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 58820 Hz | ≤ 13 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 58820 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 13 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 58820 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (110582 - 110846, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (220422 - 221941, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (40279 - 40299, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (712218 - 751846, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (5657 - 5709, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
| Average of class Tablet (309 - 9739, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (124.5 - 127.4, n=3) | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (272 - 274, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (140 - 194, n=3) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (135 - 154, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
| Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (42372 - 43057, n=3) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (646 - 646, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.11 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.22 / 8.68 / 8.75 Watt |
| Carga |
11.72 / 15.25 Watt |
    
| |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 9720 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | 11% | -169% | 30% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.22 | 1.42 -16% | 1.3 -7% | 4.4 -261% | 1.96 -61% |
| Idle Average * | 8.68 | 9.35 -8% | 3.5 60% | 8.7 -0% | 2.8 68% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.75 | 9.38 -7% | 5.6 36% | 9.6 -10% | 2.82 68% |
| Load Average * | 11.72 | 12.75 -9% | 12.5 -7% | 44 -275% | 5.31 55% |
| Load Maximum * | 15.25 | 14.96 2% | 19.2 -26% | 61 -300% | 11.91 22% |
* ... smaller is better
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 9720 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 6% | 14% | -43% | 13% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1827 | 1888 3% | 2001 10% | 690 -62% | 1276 -30% |
| H.264 | 738 | 899 22% | 936 27% | 403 -45% | 872 18% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 905 | 796 -12% | 902 0% | 586 -35% | 556 -39% |
| Load | 167 | 184 10% | 197 18% | 115 -31% | 340 104% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto: Expandindo sua liderança
O iPad Pro é atualmente o melhor tablet do mercado. É extremamente rápido, sua tela True Tone bem calibrada é uma benção para usuários criativos, a experiência do usuário é tremendamente suave, seus quatro alto-falantes integrados produzem excelente som estéreo e o tablet também está entre os melhores em termos de duração da bateria.
A Apple otimizou ainda mais o que já foi o melhor tablet do mercado com algumas atualizações cautelosas.
Todas estas características já estavam presentes na versão anterior. Entretanto, algumas atualizações conservadoras, como uma câmera atualizada com um sensor LiDAR, uma CPU um pouco mais rápida e 6 GB de RAM por padrão, independentemente da configuração de armazenamento, agora separam ainda mais o iPad Pro de outros tablets da Apple, sem mencionar as alternativas do Android.
Graças à sua tela maior, o iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) como o carro-chefe atual da série iPad Pro é ainda mais adequado para casos de uso profissional do que o iPad Pro 11 (2020). Dito isto, todo o seu potencial só pode ser desbloqueado através de acessórios, que como o próprio tablet, são bastante caros.. O Magic Keyboard, que deverá ser lançado no final de maio, deverá torna-lo quase um notebook.
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
-
05/13/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero
Pricecompare
