Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Tablet Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 – É assim como se faz uma atualização

Portátil, vai para casa? O atual iPad Pro 11 2020 está tentando fortalecer sua posição como substituto de portátil com suporte para touchpad e desempenho ainda mais rápido. Além disso, as câmeras foram aprimoradas e a tela agora suporta 120 Hz. Nesta análise, examinaremos mais de perto o cavalo de trabalho exclusivo da Apple.
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (iPad Pro Serie)
Processador
Apple A12Z Bionic 8 x - 2.5 GHz, Vortex, Tempest
Placa gráfica
Apple A12Z Bionic GPU
Memória
6 GB 
Pantalha
11.00 polegadas 2.86:2, 2388 x 1668 pixel 265 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Liquid Retina Display, IPS, ProMotion technology, display with a large color space coverage (P3), True Tone display, smudge-resistant coating, fully laminated display, anti-glare coating, Brilhante: sim, 120 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB 
, 115 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB Type-C, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, barômetro, bússola, Porta Docking (Conector Smart)
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 5.9 x 247.6 x 178.5
Bateria
28.65 Wh, 7538 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Apple iPadOS 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix flash, f/​1.8, AF, OIS, wide-angle lens (camera 1), 10.0 megapixels, flash, ultra-wide-angle lens, f/​2.4 (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix f/​2.2, flash, IR, True Depth
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Quatro alto-falantes, Teclado: Teclado virtual / Smart Keyboard Folio Cover como acessório, carregador, cabo USB Type-C, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
Released
03/18/2020
peso
471 g, Suprimento de energia: 72 g
Preço
879 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90.4 %
04/2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU
471 g5.9 mm11.00"2388x1668
89.8 %
11/2018
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
A12X Bionic, A12X Bionic GPU
468 g5.9 mm11.00"2388x1668
88.1 %
03/2020
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
790 g8.5 mm12.30"2736x1824
87.8 %
10/2019
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
SD 855, Adreno 640
420 g5.7 mm10.50"2560x1600
83.4 %
04/2018
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Kirin 960s, Mali-G71 MP8
498 g7.3 mm10.80"2560x1600

Size Comparison

292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 790 g258.7 mm 171.8 mm 7.3 mm 498 g248 mm 179 mm 5.9 mm 468 g247.6 mm 178.5 mm 5.9 mm 471 g244.5 mm 159.5 mm 5.7 mm 420 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
828 (752min - 864max) MBit/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
634 (561min - 705max) MBit/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
577 (534min - 612max) MBit/s -30%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
A12X Bionic GPU, A12X Bionic, TSB3247M61710TWNA1 64GB NVMe
488 (262min - 543max) MBit/s -41%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s -71%
iperf3 receive AX12
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
836 (743min - 888max) MBit/s +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
679 (600min - 714max) MBit/s +11%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
609 (572min - 622max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
A12X Bionic GPU, A12X Bionic, TSB3247M61710TWNA1 64GB NVMe
537 (397min - 559max) MBit/s -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s -65%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø608 (572-622)
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø828 (752-864)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Overview
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Overview
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Turn
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Turn
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Bridge
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Picture main optics
Picture main optics
Picture wide-angle optics
Picture wide-angle optics
ColorChecker
4 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
2 ∆E
4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad Pro 11 2020: 5.46 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 11.73 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.6 ∆E
41 ∆E
33 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
48.7 ∆E
38 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
49 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
47 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
45.3 ∆E
46 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad Pro 11 2020: 34.52 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 48.98 ∆E
609
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
637
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Liquid Retina Display tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 637 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 585.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 617 cd/m²
Contraste: 1714:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.156
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
IPS, 2388x1668, 11.00
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
IPS, 2388x1668, 11.00
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.50
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80
Screen
-8%
-11%
-79%
-76%
Brightness middle
617
639
4%
435
-29%
446
-28%
382
-38%
Brightness
585
591
1%
422
-28%
445
-24%
378
-35%
Brightness Distribution
84
87
4%
90
7%
86
2%
92
10%
Black Level *
0.36
0.45
-25%
0.32
11%
0.24
33%
Contrast
1714
1420
-17%
1359
-21%
1592
-7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.94
0.92
2%
1.18
-26%
2.7
-187%
2.8
-198%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.87
2.59
-39%
2.27
-21%
5.4
-189%
6
-221%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
1.3
7%
1.12
20%
2.1
-50%
3.5
-150%
Gamma
2.156 102%
2.22 99%
2.3 96%
2.05 107%
2.33 94%
CCT
6733 97%
6656 98%
6502 100%
6468 100%
6903 94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.49
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1316 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 1316 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 1316 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
1127 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (1117 - 1127, n=2)
1122 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
1120 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=67, last 2 years)
670 Points -41%
Multi-Core
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (4707 - 4712, n=2)
4710 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
4707 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
4620 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=67, last 2 years)
2377 Points -50%
Metal Score 5.1
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (9984 - 10011, n=2)
9998 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
9984 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
9361 Points -6%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
110846 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (110582 - 110846, n=2)
110714 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
73307 Points -34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26875 Points -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
221941 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (220422 - 221941, n=2)
221182 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
107333 Points -52%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
35210 Points -84%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (40279 - 40299, n=2)
40289 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
40279 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
34750 Points -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
14698 Points -64%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (712218 - 751846, n=2)
732032 Points +3%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
712218 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
678238 Points -5%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (5657 - 5709, n=2)
5683 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
5657 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
5216 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet (309 - 9739, n=13, last 2 years)
2102 Points -63%

Legend

 
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Apple A12Z Bionic, Apple A12Z Bionic GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 Apple A12X Bionic, Apple A12X Bionic GPU, TSB3247M61710TWNA1 64GB NVMe
 
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1)
127.4 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
124.5 Points -2%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (124.5 - 127.4, n=3)
126 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=58, last 2 years)
83.7 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
67 Points -47%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
277.7 Points +1%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
274.4 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (272 - 274, n=2)
273 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0)
255.5 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
118.1 Points -57%
Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years)
85.4 Points -69%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
36.13 Points -87%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1)
194 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
141 Points -27%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
172 Points -11%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (140 - 194, n=3)
158.3 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=41, last 2 years)
118.7 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
104 Points -46%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1)
154 runs/min
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (135 - 154, n=2)
144.5 runs/min -6%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (IOS 12.1.1)
131.9 (131min - 133max) runs/min -14%
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=51, last 2 years)
75.2 runs/min -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
66.2 runs/min -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
44425 Points +5%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (42372 - 43057, n=3)
42618 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1)
42425 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
42372 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0)
35408 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
24654 Points -42%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=70, last 2 years)
22748 Points -46%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
6802 Points -84%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * -821%
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=58, last 2 years)
3251 ms * -403%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
2176 ms * -237%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0)
984 ms * -52%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
646 ms *
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (646 - 646, n=2)
646 ms * -0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
603 ms * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 34.2 °C36.3 °C34.6 °C 
 34.3 °C37.9 °C36 °C 
 34.5 °C37.4 °C35.4 °C 
Máximo: 37.9 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C
36.7 °C37.9 °C35.6 °C
37.7 °C40.1 °C36.9 °C
36.4 °C37.6 °C35.4 °C
Máximo: 40.1 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR 260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Heat development front
Heat development front
Heat development back
Heat development back
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.340.42540.741.13131.138.64034.3435034.751.96328.946.48023.840.910026.249.41252253.716020.757.32002157.225018.657.131517.762.540017.268.35001970.56301771.580015.272100017.369.7125015.468.6160018.564.6200015.958.7250015.165.6315014.464.3400014.860.1500015.161.2630015.363.8800015.664.91000015.961.41250016.161.21600016.657SPL60.869.667.428.378.5N15.224.219.31.145.8median 16.6median 62.5median 43.3median 14.7median 62.1Delta3.13.92413.616.433.633.537.537.435.837.837.935.639.134.730.232.530.231.828.4412451.923.756.222.662.221.666.519.866.519.468.519.96918.368.819.466.518.5671866.218.468.118.167.118.367.417.964.417.965.317.66217.965.817.770.117.864.317.958.917.957.160.830.578.715.91.448.7median 18.3median 65.8median 63.736.515hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPad Pro 11 2020Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.3 / 3.5 / 5.6 Watt
Carga midlight 12.5 / 19.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
7736 mAh
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Power Consumption
-6%
-186%
23%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
1.2
8%
4.4
-238%
1.96
-51%
2.01
-55%
Idle Average *
3.5
4.1
-17%
8.7
-149%
2.8
20%
5.4
-54%
Idle Maximum *
5.6
7.5
-34%
9.6
-71%
2.82
50%
5.44
3%
Load Average *
12.5
13.6
-9%
44
-252%
5.31
58%
8.55
32%
Load Maximum *
19.2
15.2
21%
61
-218%
11.91
38%
11.53
40%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
33h 21min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 36min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 17min
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
7736 mAh
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Battery Runtime
4%
-50%
-2%
-22%
Reader / Idle
2001
2056
3%
690
-66%
1276
-36%
1344
-33%
H.264
936
982
5%
403
-57%
872
-7%
702
-25%
WiFi v1.3
902
920
2%
586
-35%
556
-38%
648
-28%
Load
197
208
6%
115
-42%
340
73%
196
-1%

Pro

+ Tela de 120 Hz com precisão de cores
+ Ampla variedade de acessórios
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ Desempenho veloz
+ Bom sistema de duas câmeras
+ Som de alta qualidade
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Mais barato que o seu predecessor...

Contra

- ...mas ainda muito caro
- Tempos de resposta lentos da tela
- Apenas 12 meses de garantia
- A carcaça é um pouco flexível demais

Veredicto – Atualizações sensatas e um preço mais baixo

In review: Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
In review: Apple iPad Pro 11 2020

A Apple fez algumas melhorias em seu modelo iPad Pro 11 2020 e até reduziu os preços da maioria das configurações. Embora isso possa parecer uma grande pechincha, o Apple iPad Pro ainda não sai barato. No entanto, muitos de seus aspectos também refletem os preços premium: Apesar de já serem a referência no setor de tablets, as câmeras foram aprimoradas ainda mais. Embora não possam corresponder às mais recentes câmeras de smartphones de gama alta, são mais do que capazes de tirar belas fotos.

A ampla gama de acessórios foi expandida com o Magic Keyboard e a porta USB Type-C também abre o tablet Apple para hardware de terceiros. Graças ao novo cursor, por exemplo, um mouse USB normal agora pode ser usado para navegar pelo sistema.

O dispositivo é poderoso, equipado com Wi-Fi e armazenamento rápidos, além de uma tela com muita precisão de cores e capaz de exibir animações extremamente fluentes graças à sua taxa de atualização de 120 Hz.

Atualizações sensatas e preços mais moderados: O Apple iPad Pro 11 é, mais uma vez, uma boa escolha em 2020, se você puder pagar.

Como a Apple fez atualizações razoáveis no geral, mesmo uma atualização da geração anterior pode valer a pena. O fato de a carcaça ser um pouco flexível demais é a única desvantagem real.

Nota: Como muitos de nossos benchmarks ainda não são compatíveis com o iPad OS 13.4 e o Magic Keyboard será lançado em maio como um acessório importante, atualizaremos nossa análise assim que as novas informações estiverem disponíveis.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 - 04/11/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
84 / 98 → 86%
Teclado
77 / 80 → 96%
Mouse
99%
Conectividade
51 / 70 → 72%
Peso
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
61 / 78 → 78%
Desempenho da aplicação
82 / 92 → 89%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
82 / 91 → 90%
Camera
67 / 85 → 79%
Médio
81%
90%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 – É assim como se faz uma atualização
Florian Schmitt, 2020-04-15 (Update: 2020-04-23)