Breve Análise do Tablet Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2018, LTE, 256 GB)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
|
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 632 cd/m²
Contraste: 1975:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.90 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.90 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.50 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80 | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB IPS, 2736x1834, 12.30 | Apple iPad 6 2018 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.70 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -1% | -57% | -201% | -78% | -22% | |
Brightness middle | 632 | 650 3% | 474 -25% | 384 -39% | 463 -27% | 530 -16% |
Brightness | 605 | 614 1% | 477 -21% | 360 -40% | 450 -26% | 513 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 91 0% | 84 -8% | 83 -9% | 92 1% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.42 -31% | 0.8 -150% | 0.32 -0% | 0.61 -91% | |
Contrast | 1975 | 1548 -22% | 480 -76% | 1447 -27% | 869 -56% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1 9% | 2.5 -127% | 6.83 -521% | 3.76 -242% | 1.2 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 1.9 21% | 5.8 -142% | 12.7 -429% | 7.35 -206% | 3.2 -33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.5 12% | 2.1 -24% | 7.5 -341% | 3.18 -87% | 1 41% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.08 106% | 2.199 100% | 2.53 87% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 6794 96% | 6734 97% | 6281 103% | 8544 76% | 6994 93% | 6588 99% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.68 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise | |
↘ 30.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms). |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (4984 - 5002, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
Average of class Tablet (745 - 5713, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (17691 - 18041, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 | |
Average of class Tablet (1418 - 15310, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
Compute RenderScript Score | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (41735 - 43802, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
Average of class Tablet (2128 - 10799, n=11, last 2 years) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (119.9 - 120, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 | |
Average of class Tablet (14 - 120, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (438 - 451, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
Average of class Tablet (15 - 873, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (95.6 - 110, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 | |
Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 120, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (202 - 220, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 | |
Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 494, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (59.3 - 95, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 118.3, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (169 - 173, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 | |
Average of class Tablet (5 - 340, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (552676 - 566378, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (5216 - 5300, n=2) | |
Average of class Tablet (309 - 9739, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (278 - 279, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (Safari Mobile 9.0) | |
Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (44425 - 45734, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (Safari Mobile 9.0) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (Safari Mobile 9.0) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (603 - 614, n=2) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB (Edge 18) | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (172 - 182, n=2) | |
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=41, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Average Apple A12X Bionic (380 - 386, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (Safari Mobile 9.0) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) |
* ... smaller is better
Battle Bay
PUBG Mobile
Arena of Valor
Asphalt 9: Legends
World of Tanks Blitz
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.01 / 0.23 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.42 / 9.35 / 9.38 Watt |
Carga |
12.75 / 14.96 Watt |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 10875 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 7300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | 40% | -5% | -1% | -86% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.42 | 1.55 -9% | 1.76 -24% | 3.3 -132% | 2.2 -55% | 4.3 -203% |
Idle Average * | 9.35 | 8.58 8% | 4.22 55% | 4.2 55% | 7.8 17% | 8.7 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.38 | 8.59 8% | 4.25 55% | 7 25% | 7.9 16% | 9.4 -0% |
Load Average * | 12.75 | 10.09 21% | 4.52 65% | 10.4 18% | 12.6 1% | 24.5 -92% |
Load Maximum * | 14.96 | 10.61 29% | 7.35 51% | 13.8 8% | 12.8 14% | 36 -141% |
* ... smaller is better
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 10875 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 7300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 16% | -15% | -15% | -5% | -37% | |
Reader / Idle | 1888 | 2919 55% | 1227 -35% | 1254 -34% | 1066 -44% | |
H.264 | 899 | 676 -25% | 735 -18% | 629 -30% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 796 | 736 -8% | 495 -38% | 670 -16% | 714 -10% | 545 -32% |
Load | 184 | 257 40% | 245 33% | 220 20% | 185 1% | 118 -36% |
Pro
Contra
O Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2018) não apenas nos impressionou durante o keynote da Apple, mas também quando recebemos nosso dispositivo de teste pela primeira vez. Sim, ainda é um enorme tablet, mas é mais fino e mais leve que seus antecessores. A nova Apple Pencil também é ótima na mão.
Uma grande atração do novo iPad Pro 12.9 será seu desempenho alegado, que a Apple afirma que superará 92% de todos os portáteis lançados em 2018. Notavelmente, isso inclui alguns modelos Core i7. A empresa também se orgulha de que o desempenho da GPU A12X deve rivalizar com o Xbox One S. A Apple realmente fez tudo certo com essas enormes alegações, e o novo iPad Pro 12.9 não consegue corresponder às expectativas. O A12X Bionic é atualmente o SoC baseado em ARM mais rápido que foi lançado no mercado, mas não há uma maneira precisa de comparar seu desempenho com processadores x86.
O iPad Pro 12.9 de terceira geração é um fantástico tablet e é atualmente o melhor tablet baseado em ARM que o dinheiro pode comprar. No entanto, o iOS continua a impedir que o iPad Pro seja um substituto genuíno de portátil, o que é uma pena, pois é poderoso o suficiente para ser um.
A maior falha do iPad Pro 12.9 é o iOS. O sistema operacional não tem um sistema de arquivos utilizável, e o dispositivo atualmente também não pode ler unidades flash USB, para citar apenas alguns problemas que temos com o iOS. O Galaxy Tab S4 é infinitamente mais flexível a esse respeito. Os usuários que precisam apenas de um dispositivo leve para e-mails, consumo de mídia e aplicativos de escritório, ficarão satisfeitos com o novo iPad Pro 12.9, embora seja extremamente caro. No entanto, depois de três gerações, a Apple não cumpriu sua promessa de criar um tablet que possa substituir um portátil.
O novo iPad Pro 12.9 é ótimo para quem valoriza o Apple Pencil e sabe usá-lo. Recomendamos pegar o modelo menor se você planeja usar o dispositivo em movimento. Além disso, a versão de 64 GB deve ter armazenamento suficiente para a maioria dos usuários que querem apenas um tablet grande para consumo de mídia.
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
-
09/16/2019 v7
Daniel Schmidt