Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC (Ryzen 5 1600, Radeon RX 580, FHD)

Name: Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
Brand: Asus

Com muita fome de energia. O Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC pode rodar todos os últimos jogos modernos sem problemas em sua tela mate. O portátil vem equipado com um processador hexa-core Ryzen 5 1600, uma GPU Radeon RX 580 e uma unidade híbrida. Este modelo de nível de entrada renuncia a um SSD.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 02/08/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Windows Zen

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (GL702 Serie)

Processador

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6 x 3.2 - 3.6 GHz, Zen

Placa gráfica

AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1077 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, GDDR5, 256-bit-wide bus, 23.20.15002.11 (Adrenalin 17.12.1), no Enduro

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4-2400, single-channel, dois slots RAM (um slot ocupado)

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5, IPS, FreeSync, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

AMD B350

Disco rígido

Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172, 1027 GB

, 5400 rpm, 900 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC256 @ AMD K17 - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones/microfone, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 34 x 415 x 280

Bateria

74 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: chiclet-style, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, McAfee LiveSafe (versão de teste), MS Office 365 (versão de teste), 24 Meses Garantia

peso

3.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.2 kg

Preço

1249 Euro

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Predator Helios 300 MSI GL72 7RDX-602 MSI GF72VR 7RF Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T Nexoc G739 HP Omen 17-w206ng DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Predator Helios 300 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	79 MB/s +36%
Nexoc G739 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	78 MB/s +34%
HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	76 MB/s +31%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	76 MB/s +31%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	58 MB/s
MSI GF72VR 7RF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26.3 MB/s -55%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	23.6 MB/s -59%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	91 MB/s
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	90 MB/s -1%
Nexoc G739 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	87 MB/s -4%
HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	87 MB/s -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	84 MB/s -8%
MSI GF72VR 7RF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	27.1 MB/s -70%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	19.9 MB/s -78%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	670 MBit/s
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	613 MBit/s -9%
MSI GF72VR 7RF Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	555 MBit/s -17%
Acer Predator Helios 300 Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4	545 MBit/s -19%
HP Omen 17-w206ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	542 MBit/s -19%
Nexoc G739 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	388 MBit/s -42%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	342 MBit/s -49%
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Predator Helios 300 Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4	696 MBit/s +10%
HP Omen 17-w206ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	687 MBit/s +9%
MSI GF72VR 7RF Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	649 MBit/s +3%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	633 MBit/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	632 MBit/s
Nexoc G739 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	443 MBit/s -30%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	305 MBit/s -52%


341 cd/m²	367 cd/m²	354 cd/m²
344 cd/m²	415 cd/m²	350 cd/m²
356 cd/m²	391 cd/m²	367 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 415 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 365 cd/m² Minimum: 19.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 415 cd/m²
Contraste: 988:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.69 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Asus GL702ZC-GC104T IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI GF72VR 7RF TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.30	Acer Predator Helios 300 AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI GL72 7RDX-602 TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.30	Nexoc G739 IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	HP Omen 17-w206ng IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		3%	34%	3%	8%	7%	9%
Display P3 Coverage	65.4	67.1 3%	90.8 39%	66.8 2%	65.2 0%	66.7 2%	67.2 3%
sRGB Coverage	82.6	85.4 3%	99.8 21%	85.8 4%	94.3 14%	91 10%	93.1 13%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	60.4	62.5 3%	85.6 42%	62.8 4%	65.6 9%	66.4 10%	67.4 12%
Response Times		-4%	39%	7%	3%	-24%	-10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36 ?(18, 18)	39.2 ?(20.4, 18.8) -9%	24.4 ?(15.2, 9.2) 32%	36 ?(18, 18) -0%	29 ?(14, 15) 19%	45 ?(20, 25) -25%	38 ?(20, 18) -6%
Response Time Black / White *	23 ?(14, 9)	22.8 ?(11.2, 11.6) 1%	12.6 ?(11.2, 1.4) 45%	20 ?(8.4, 11.6) 13%	26 ?(21, 5) -13%	28 ?(7, 21) -22%	26 ?(15.6, 10.4) -13%
PWM Frequency		122000 ?(90)	25000 ?(20)	119000 ?(85)	961	450 ?(90)	200 ?(95)
Screen		9%	-13%	4%	-42%	11%	5%
Brightness middle	415	379 -9%	329.2 -21%	384 -7%	299 -28%	312 -25%	318 -23%
Brightness	365	354 -3%	318 -13%	373 2%	274 -25%	304 -17%	295 -19%
Brightness Distribution	82	89 9%	92 12%	93 13%	80 -2%	85 4%	79 -4%
Black Level *	0.42	0.31 26%	0.4 5%	0.35 17%	0.25 40%	0.23 45%	0.25 40%
Contrast	988	1223 24%	823 -17%	1097 11%	1196 21%	1357 37%	1272 29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.95	4.32 13%	6.4 -29%	4.81 3%	12.92 -161%	4.19 15%	4.7 5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.34	8.56 8%	11.7 -25%	8.69 7%	19.91 -113%	8.7 7%	8.8 6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.69	4 15%	9.2 -96%	5.33 -14%	13.16 -181%	3.72 21%	5 -7%
Gamma	2.33 ^94%	2.47 ^89%	2.18 ^101%	2.45 ^90%	2.36 ^93%	2.29 ^96%	2.28 ^96%
CCT	6485 ^100%	6984 ^93%	10484 ^62%	7137 ^91%	15046 ^43%	7104 ^91%	7374 ^88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	54	56 4%	76 41%	56 4%	60 11%	59 9%	61 13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	82	85 4%	92 12%	86 5%	94 15%	91 11%	93 13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / 6%	20% / 3%	5% / 4%	-10% / -26%	-2% / 5%	1% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

10652

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

25561

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4330

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

89.3 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

12.5 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.55 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

107.9 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1129 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

140 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 Intel Core i7-7700K	192 Points +37%
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K	190 Points +36%
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2 Intel Core i5-8600K	181 Points +29%
Guru Mars K Intel Core i7-7700	178 Points +27%
no name Intel Core i5-8400	167 Points +19%
Nexoc G739 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	161 Points +15%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	161 Points +15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	159 Points +14%
HP Omen 17-w206ng Intel Core i7-7700HQ	159 Points +14%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	156 Points +11%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Intel Core i5-7300HQ	148 Points +6%
MSI GF72VR 7RF Intel Core i7-7700HQ	146 Points +4%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700	144 Points +3%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	141 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600	140 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700	1408 Points +25%
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K	1362 Points +21%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600	1129 Points
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2 Intel Core i5-8600K	988 Points -12%
no name Intel Core i5-8400	941 (921.89^min - 945.25^max) Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 Intel Core i7-7700K	919 Points -19%
Guru Mars K Intel Core i7-7700	857 Points -24%
Nexoc G739 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	743 Points -34%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	742 Points -34%
Acer Predator Helios 300 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	735 Points -35%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	731 Points -35%
HP Omen 17-w206ng Intel Core i7-7700HQ	729 Points -35%
MSI GF72VR 7RF Intel Core i7-7700HQ	708 Points -37%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	515 Points -54%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Intel Core i5-7300HQ	511 Points -55%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700	15.76 Points +26%
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K	15.02 Points +20%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600	12.5 Points
no name Intel Core i5-8400	10.99 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 Intel Core i7-7700K	10.14 Points -19%
Guru Mars K Intel Core i7-7700	9.52 Points -24%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.21 Points -34%
Nexoc G739 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.15 Points -35%
Acer Predator Helios 300 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.14 Points -35%
HP Omen 17-w206ng Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.09 Points -35%
MSI GF72VR 7RF Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.09 Points -35%
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K	2.23 Points +44%
SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 Intel Core i7-7700K	2.18 Points +41%
Guru Mars K Intel Core i7-7700	2.02 Points +30%
no name Intel Core i5-8400	1.9 Points +23%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.84 Points +19%
Nexoc G739 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.82 Points +17%
MSI GF72VR 7RF Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.82 Points +17%
Acer Predator Helios 300 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.81 Points +17%
HP Omen 17-w206ng Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.81 Points +17%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700	1.63 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600	1.55 Points

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K	39382 Points +54%
no name Intel Core i5-8400	30921 Points +21%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700	29330 Points +15%
MSI GF72VR 7RF Intel Core i7-7700HQ	29209 Points +14%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600	25561 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	22380 Points -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	22143 Points -13%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Intel Core i5-7300HQ	18304 Points -28%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	18296 Points -28%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K	7423 Points +71%
MSI GF72VR 7RF Intel Core i7-7700HQ	7214 Points +67%
no name Intel Core i5-8400	6371 Points +47%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5952 Points +37%
Acer Predator Helios 300 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5874 Points +36%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	5525 Points +28%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Intel Core i5-7300HQ	5502 Points +27%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600	4330 Points
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700	4286 Points -1%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700	23920 Points +23%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600	19391 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	14090 Points -27%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Intel Core i5-7300HQ	9752 Points -50%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	9728 Points -50%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	3840 Points +20%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700	3343 Points +5%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Intel Core i5-7300HQ	3195 Points 0%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	3195 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600	3189 Points

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
no name Intel Core i5-8400	19500 Points +30%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600	15037 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	14216 Points -5%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	10525 Points -30%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Intel Core i5-7300HQ	8085 Points -46%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
no name Intel Core i5-8400	4996 Points +41%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	4682 Points +32%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	4061 Points +15%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600	3542 Points
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Intel Core i5-7300HQ	3387 Points -4%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
no name Intel Core i5-8400	20500 Points +26%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700	18457 Points +14%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600	16235 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	15111 Points -7%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	11039 Points -32%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Intel Core i5-7300HQ	8081 Points -50%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
no name Intel Core i5-8400	5104 Points +41%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	4808 Points +33%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	4159 Points +15%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700	3884 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600	3611 Points
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Intel Core i5-7300HQ	3387 Points -6%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700 (Edge 15)	1054 ms * -3%
MSI GF72VR 7RF Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Microsoft Edge 40.15063.674.0)	1025 ms * -0%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (Edge 41)	1021 ms *
Acer Predator Helios 300 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 40.15063.0.0)	963 ms * +6%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (EDGE 38.14393.1066.0)	952 ms * +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 41)	930 ms * +9%
Nexoc G739 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 38.14393.0.0)	919 ms * +10%
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K (Edge 41.16299.15.0)	753 ms * +26%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K (Edge 41.16299.15.0)	48562 Points +58%
Nexoc G739 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 38.14393.0.0)	41110 Points +34%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (EDGE 38.14393.1066.0)	40592 Points +32%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 41)	39373 Points +28%
Acer Predator Helios 300 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 40.15063.0.0)	36449 Points +19%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700 (Edge 15)	32176 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (Edge 41)	30668 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K (Edge 41.16299.15.0)	333 Points +52%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 41)	276 Points +26%
Nexoc G739 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 38.14393.0.0)	268 Points +23%
MSI GF72VR 7RF Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Microsoft Edge 40.15063.674.0)	263.5 Points +21%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (EDGE 38.14393.1066.0)	259.8 Points +19%
HP Omen 17-w206ng Intel Core i7-7700HQ	253.5 Points +16%
Acer Predator Helios 300 Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 40.15063.0.0)	250.7 Points +15%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Intel Core i5-7300HQ (Edge 40)	247.8 Points +13%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Intel Core i5-7300HQ (Edge 38)	247.5 Points +13%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700 (Edge 15)	227.9 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (Edge 41)	218.4 Points

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score		5444 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4186 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5608 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4988 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		4440 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator Helios 300 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	4874 Points +16%
Nexoc G739 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4270 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-w206ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4216 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	4186 Points
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R7 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002	4173 Points 0%
MSI GF72VR 7RF GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4002 Points -4%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	3220 Points -23%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172

Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 36.8 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 137.9 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Média: 104.3 MB/s

Tempo de Acesso: 18.9 ms

Índice de Explosão: 183.5 MB/s

Uso da CPU: 1.2 %

	Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	Acer Predator Helios 300 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	MSI GL72 7RDX-602 HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	Nexoc G739 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	HP Omen 17-w206ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		37802%	119%	50561%	47936%
Read Seq	92.5	899 872%	135.3 46%	1666 1701%	1606 1636%
Write Seq	105.1	569 441%	127 21%	1192 1034%	1176 1019%
Read 512	37.67	580 1440%	45.57 21%	857 2175%	846 2146%
Write 512	101.8	425.9 318%	58.3 -43%	827 712%	805 691%
Read 4k	0.484	34.29 6985%	0.582 20%	60.7 12441%	59.9 12276%
Write 4k	0.169	125.5 74160%	1.022 505%	154.5 91320%	155.6 91971%
Read 4k QD32	1.294	457.7 35271%	1.068 -17%	636 49050%	588 45340%
Write 4k QD32	0.221	404.5 182932%	1.102 399%	544 246054%	505 228407%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		28909 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		12626 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		28295 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9866 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		3718 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X9C NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K	46773 Points +208%
Guru Mars K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700	29615 Points +95%
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i5-8600K	25604 Points +69%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	18205 Points +20%
Acer Predator Helios 300 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	15607 Points +3%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 1700	15264 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	15182 Points
MSI GF72VR 7RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	14518 Points -4%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	12970 Points -15%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-7300HQ	10270 Points -32%
HP Omen 17-w206ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	9482 Points -38%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	7769 Points -49%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
Eurocom Sky X9C NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K	26751 Points +171%
no name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), Intel Core i5-8400	19885 Points +102%
Guru Mars K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700	16980 Points +72%
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i5-8600K	15909 Points +61%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	11857 Points +20%
Acer Predator Helios 300 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	10144 Points +3%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	10093 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	9866 Points
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 1700	9642 Points -2%
MSI GF72VR 7RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	9356 Points -5%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8725 Points -12%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-7300HQ	6500 Points -34%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5622 Points -43%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
no name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), Intel Core i5-8400	8523 Points +129%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	4396 Points +18%
Acer Predator Helios 300 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	3854 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	3718 Points
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 1700	3696 Points -1%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-7300HQ	2407 Points -35%

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

The Witcher 3 ultra

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
X-Plane 10.25 (2013)	72	42.2	21.8	20.6
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)	163.5	102.6	81.3	54.1
GTA V (2015)	120.4	115.5	83.4	39.6
The Witcher 3 (2015)	173	121	68.9	36
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	86	77	76.3	69
World of Warships (2015)	135.1	115	101	95.9
Anno 2205 (2015)	98.6	95.4	65.5	25.7
XCOM 2 (2016)	82	66	51.1	24.5
Hitman 2016 (2016)	56.2	54.4	49.8	47.7
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	35.3	30	29.2
Overwatch (2016)	276.3	276	191.1	96.2
Mafia 3 (2016)	55.9	45.9	35
Civilization VI (2016)	105.6	84.8	69.8	63.5
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017)	38.2	33.6	27.1	25.1
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017)	106.7	72.3	69.4	53.4
Team Fortress 2 (2017)	108	105	102	101
FIFA 18 (2017)	242.9	242.2	218.1	215.4
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)	117	85	66	49
The Evil Within 2 (2017)	56.4	47.1	45.4	44.3
ELEX (2017)	117.1	80	63.5	48.6
Destiny 2 (2017)	97.6	91.4	83.3	69.7
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017)	50	44	43	37
Call of Duty WWII (2017)	132.3	128.8	68	39.1
Need for Speed Payback (2017)	92.8	86	78.5	75.6
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)	62	53.9	45.6	45.7
Fortnite (2018)	238.5	183.1	80.6	59.5

Middle-earth: Shadow of War - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Eurocom Sky X9C NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K	92 fps +88%
Gigabyte Aero 15X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	69 fps +41%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	62 fps +27%
PC Zentrum Defiance IV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	53 fps +8%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	49 fps
HP Omen 15t-ce000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	46 fps -6%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Eurocom Sky X9C NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K	184.3 fps +167%
Guru Mars K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700	145 fps +110%
Gigabyte Aero 15X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	94.5 fps +37%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	90.3 fps +31%
Saelic Vidi G771D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700	87.4 fps +27%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	72.4 fps +5%
PC Zentrum Defiance IV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	72.3 fps +5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	71.7 (62^min - 81^max) fps +4%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	68.9 fps
HP Omen 15t-ce000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	68.5 fps -1%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	68 fps -1%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 1700	67.4 (58^min) fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG P507 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	67.1 fps -3%
Nexoc G739 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	50.4 fps -27%
HP Omen 17-w206ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	47.96 fps -30%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	47.4 fps -31%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-7300HQ	46.7 fps -32%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	36.3 fps -47%

World of Warships - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:High FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	95.9 fps
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	85 fps -11%

Need for Speed Payback - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	87.2 fps +15%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	75.6 fps
PC Zentrum Defiance IV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	66.2 fps -12%

Call of Duty WWII - 1920x1080 High / On AA:Filmic 1X SM
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	97.2 fps +43%
PC Zentrum Defiance IV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	92.3 fps +36%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	68 fps

Civilization VI - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	63.5 fps
MSI GS73VR 7RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	43 fps -32%
HP Omen 17-w100ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i5-6300HQ	42.8 fps -33%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus GL702VM-GC102D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	48.2 fps +22%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	39.6 fps

Hitman 2016 - 1920x1080 Ultra / On AA:SM AF:16x
MSI GS73VR 7RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	57 fps +19%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	56 fps +17%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	51 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG P507 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	49.6 fps +4%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	47.7 fps
MSI GF72VR 7RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	46 fps -4%

Mafia 3 - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Eurocom Sky X9C NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K	115 fps +151%
Saelic Vidi G771D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700	94.7 fps +106%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	48 fps +5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	47.1 fps +3%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	45.9 fps

Star Wars Battlefront 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
PC Zentrum Defiance IV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	55 fps +20%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	45.7 fps

Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Eurocom Sky X9C NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K	300 fps +212%
SCHENKER XMG P507 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	103 fps +7%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	96.2 fps

Destiny 2 - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:SM AF:16x
Eurocom Sky X9C NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K	113.1 fps +62%
PC Zentrum Defiance IV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	71.4 fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600	69.7 fps

Barulho

Ocioso		30.6 / 32.7 / 32.7 dB
HDD		31.2 dB
Carga		38.9 / 50.6 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


39 °C	54.3 °C	45.6 °C
26.6 °C	48.4 °C	36 °C
29 °C	28.8 °C	30.2 °C

Máximo: 54.3 °C
Médio: 6 °C


51 °C	43 °C	47.5 °C
38.6 °C	38 °C	35.1 °C
27.4 °C	30 °C	28.8 °C

Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 37.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 42.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


33 °C	27.1 °C	35.4 °C
27 °C	34.8 °C	36 °C
27.9 °C	27 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 4 °C


34.1 °C	34.3 °C	32 °C
30.7 °C	30.8 °C	29 °C
25.8 °C	26.5 °C	27.8 °C

Máximo: 34.3 °C
Médio: 30.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 37.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


36.6 °C	56 °C	42.6 °C
25.1 °C	48 °C	34 °C
27 °C	27.6 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 6.2 °C


38.4 °C	34.6 °C	34.6 °C
31.4 °C	31.7 °C	30.9 °C
24.4 °C	27 °C	26.5 °C

Máximo: 38.4 °C
Médio: 31.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 42.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 6 °C / 43 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.3 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 4 °C / 39 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 6.2 °C / 43 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).

Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.3 / 0.9 Watt
Ocioso	49 / 60 / 68 Watt
Carga	150 / 262 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 41)		1h 20min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh	380 min +375%
Nexoc G739 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh	288 min +260%
Acer Predator Helios 300 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 48 Wh	279 min +249%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 43.2 Wh	203 min +154%
MSI GF72VR 7RF i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 43 Wh	142 min +78%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T R7 1700, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 76 Wh	90 min +13%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T R5 1600, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 74 Wh	80 min

Pro

+ Tela brilhante e de alto contraste

+ Resolução Full HD

+ FreeSync

+ Muito espaço de armazenamento

+ Um slot M.2 livre

+ A CPU é removível

+ Muito desempenho multi-core

Contra

- Alto consumo de energia durante o modo inativo

- Adaptador de CA pesado

- Duração da bateria muito pobre

- Sem Thunderbolt 3

- Sem SSD

- RAM difícil de atualizar

The Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T, provided courtesy of: cyberport

O portátil de jogos da Asus pode rodar a maioria dos jogos sem problemas na resolução Full HD e com altas configurações de gráficos. Apenas alguns títulos exigem a redução da resolução e/ou das configurações de gráficos. A tecnologia FreeSync da AMD cria uma experiência de jogo fluida na tela de 60Hz. A tela IPS mate agrada com uma alta relação de contraste, bom brilho e ângulos de visão estáveis.

O processador integrado hexa-core deixa uma boa impressão.

Oferece potência de computação mais que suficiente para todos os aplicativos modernos. Em termos de desempenho multi-core, a CPU se sai melhor do que a concorrência da Intel - na verdade, foi apenas derrotada pelo Core i7-8700K. No entanto, o Core i7-8700K é um chip de 95 watts, que não compete diretamente com o processador Ryzen. Além disso, o Core i7-8700K custa significativamente mais do que a CPU Ryzen.

O portátil oferece muito espaço de armazenamento. A Asus equipou o portátil com uma unidade híbrida de 1 TB. Para alcançar o menor preço possível, a Asus decidiu renunciar a um SSD. No entanto, um SSD pode ser adicionado após a compra, porque o portátil vem com um slot M.2-2280 livre.

Como o portátil vem apenas com uma poderosa GPU dedicada, ele precisa de muita energia, mesmo durante o modo inativo. Portanto, os usuários que gostariam de usar o portátil para o trabalho diário do escritório devem ficar longe dele. Aqui, o portátil da Asus não possui uma GPU integrada energeticamente eficiente. Além disso, o portátil produz muito barulho para uso no escritório.

A Asus cobra 1200 Euros (~$1485) pelo modelo de nível de entrada na linha GL702ZC. Portanto, em termos de preços, é comparável aos portáteis que vêm equipados com um processador Intel Core e uma placa gráfica Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060. No entanto, esses dispositivos geralmente são utilizáveis em cenários cotidianos, porque, como norma, eles vêm com uma GPU dedicada e uma GPU integrada. Como resultado, esses dispositivos têm uma demanda de energia significativamente menor durante o modo inativo e produzem muito menos ruído - aqui, por exemplo, temos em mente o Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G. Portanto, o GL702ZC é para aqueles que querem o máximo de desempenho de vários núcleos quanto possível por um preço relativamente baixo e que colocam uma vantagem na capacidade de substituir a CPU.

Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T - 2018-02-02 02/02/2018 v6^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

79 / 98 → 81%

Teclado

75%

Mouse

78%

Conectividade

64 / 81 → 79%

Peso

55 / 10-66 → 81%

Bateria

50%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

93%

Desempenho da aplicação

88%

Temperatura

85 / 95 → 89%

Ruído

80 / 90 → 88%

Audio

80%

Camera

42 / 85 → 49%

Médio

73%

83%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC (Ryzen 5 1600, Radeon RX 580, FHD)

Sascha Mölck, 2018-02- 8 (Update: 2018-02-21)

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC (Ryzen 5 1600, Radeon RX 580, FHD)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare