Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Dell Vostro 15-5581: Um portátil de escritório com uma MX130 para jogos leves
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (8 - 82.7, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate X3410-M-50DD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5581 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 90.5, n=43, last 2 years) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5581 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate X3410-M-50DD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 231 cd/m²
Contraste: 1777:1 (Preto: 0.13 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.2
ΔE Greyscale 5.19 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.15% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.86% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
| Dell Vostro 15-5581 156CL04 1G2XW, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Vostro 15-5568 Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Vostro 15-5568 Chi Mei CMN154C-8KV42 , , 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP 250 G7 6HM85ES BOE0687, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Acer TravelMate X3410-M-50DD N140HCA-EAC, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | 2% | 8% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.86 | 40.14 3% | 39.61 2% | 41.96 8% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.5 | 60 3% | 59.5 2% | 63 8% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.15 | 41.5 3% | 40.93 2% | 43.37 8% | |
| Response Times | 4143% | -17% | 3987% | 3884% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 41 ? -14% | 47.6 ? -32% | 41 ? -14% | 42 ? -17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 15 ? 44% | 27.2 ? -1% | 12 ? 56% | 30 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency | 208 ? | 26000 ? 12400% | 25000 ? 11919% | 24500 ? 11679% | |
| Screen | -62% | -71% | -69% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 231 | 239 3% | 229 -1% | 205 -11% | 255 10% |
| Brightness | 213 | 219 3% | 222 4% | 205 -4% | 218 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 86 -1% | 82 -6% | 88 1% | 72 -17% |
| Black Level * | 0.13 | 0.43 -231% | 0.56 -331% | 0.52 -300% | 0.08 38% |
| Contrast | 1777 | 556 -69% | 409 -77% | 394 -78% | 3188 79% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.81 | 10.11 -110% | 10.36 -115% | 11.15 -132% | 5.01 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.33 | 17.33 -108% | 14.95 -79% | 19.08 -129% | 17.44 -109% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.2 | 2.98 29% | 4.06 3% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.19 | 10.88 -110% | 10.9 -110% | 12.62 -143% | 3 42% |
| Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.33 94% | 2.21 100% | 2.38 92% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 7088 92% | 11924 55% | 10084 64% | 14189 46% | 6185 105% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 38 3% | 37.69 2% | 38 3% | 40 8% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 60 3% | 57.92 0% | 59 2% | 63 9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1361% /
739% | -44% /
-62% | 1307% /
659% | 1299% /
690% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 208 Hz | ≤ 10 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 208 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 208 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (82.6 - 284, n=118, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (111 - 164, n=35) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5581 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (160.8 - 2642, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5581 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (457 - 750, n=38) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3727 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4946 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3272 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Vostro 15-5581 SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 | Dell Vostro 15-5568 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | Dell Vostro 15-5568 Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | HP 250 G7 6HM85ES WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Average SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 12% | 182% | 24% | ||
| Write 4K | 129.3 | 109.5 -15% | 179.3 39% | 108.2 ? -16% | |
| Read 4K | 41.02 | 26.43 -36% | 47.7 16% | 39.3 ? -4% | |
| Write Seq | 203.4 | 474.2 133% | 1265 522% | 284 ? 40% | |
| Read Seq | 271.2 | 482.8 78% | 1184 337% | 772 ? 185% | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 252.3 | 160.5 -36% | 450.6 79% | 239 ? -5% | |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 281.4 | 221.5 -21% | 556 98% | 279 ? -1% | |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 319.8 | 500 56% | 1455 355% | 303 ? -5% | |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1589 | 533 -66% | 1717 8% | 1597 ? 1% | |
| AS SSD | -20% | -14% | 188% | -8% | |
| Seq Read | 1195 | 502 -58% | 492.6 -59% | 1477 24% | 1157 ? -3% |
| Seq Write | 370.2 | 465.2 26% | 462.2 25% | 1339 262% | 359 ? -3% |
| 4K Read | 39.14 | 26.84 -31% | 25.59 -35% | 46.26 18% | 34.3 ? -12% |
| 4K Write | 115.5 | 50.3 -56% | 87.6 -24% | 143.9 25% | 105.6 ? -9% |
| 4K-64 Read | 257.9 | 357.9 39% | 231.9 -10% | 937 263% | 257 ? 0% |
| 4K-64 Write | 166.2 | 156.4 -6% | 290.7 75% | 1190 616% | 153.5 ? -8% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.073 | 0.098 -34% | 0.149 -104% | 0.046 37% | 0.09467 ? -30% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.045 | 0.083 -84% | 0.057 -27% | 0.024 47% | 0.04667 ? -4% |
| Score Read | 417 | 435 4% | 307 -26% | 1131 171% | 407 ? -2% |
| Score Write | 319 | 253 -21% | 424 33% | 1468 360% | 295 ? -8% |
| Score Total | 922 | 917 -1% | 896 -3% | 3181 245% | 883 ? -4% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 267.5 | 765 | 245 ? | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 106.4 | 239.9 | 135.3 ? | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 161.1 | 528 | 223 ? | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -20% /
-20% | -1% /
-3% | 185% /
185% | 8% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2692 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 10635 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2115 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 724 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 83.6 | 57.3 | 51 | 48.7 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.6 / 31.6 / 31.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 42.6 / 42.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.1 °C / 80.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+0.6 °C / 1.1 F).
Dell Vostro 15-5581 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.34 / Watt |
| Ocioso | 5 / 7.9 / 11.2 Watt |
| Carga |
34 / 50.2 Watt |
   
| |
| Dell Vostro 15-5581 i5-8265U, GeForce MX130, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Vostro 15-5568 i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA i7-8565U, GeForce MX130, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP 250 G7 6HM85ES i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | -6% | 26% | -10% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5 | 3.1 38% | 3.12 38% | 3.2 36% | 4.54 ? 9% | 4.3 ? 14% |
| Idle Average * | 7.9 | 6.3 20% | 6.3 20% | 5.7 28% | 6.98 ? 12% | 7.35 ? 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.2 | 6.5 42% | 9.78 13% | 6.1 46% | 9.08 ? 19% | 9.15 ? 18% |
| Load Average * | 34 | 46 -35% | 57.6 -69% | 36.5 -7% | 54.1 ? -59% | 41.1 ? -21% |
| Load Maximum * | 50.2 | 54 -8% | 67.3 -34% | 37.5 25% | 66.4 ? -32% | 58.1 ? -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42 |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Vostro 15-5581 i5-8265U, GeForce MX130, 42 Wh | Dell Vostro 15-5568 i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 42 Wh | Dell Vostro 15-5568 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | HP 250 G7 6HM85ES i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -16% | 16% | -1% | 59% | |
| Reader / Idle | 747 | 800 7% | 1011 35% | 833 12% | 1436 ? 92% |
| H.264 | 394 | 512 30% | 426 8% | 705 ? 79% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 410 | 260 -37% | 357 -13% | 339 -17% | 594 ? 45% |
| Load | 97 | 79 -19% | 110 13% | 91 -6% | 117.7 ? 21% |
Pro
Contra
O dispositivo tem um design elegante, embora sua carcaça plástica tenha algumas inconsistências no acabamento. A Dell também equipou o Vostro 15-5581 com dispositivos de entrada decentes, então você nunca deveria sentir a necessidade de pegar um mouse ou teclado externo.
Infelizmente, a tela em nossa unidade de teste está abaixo do esperado, com um brilho máximo inaceitavelmente baixo. Ele tem ângulos de visão estáveis e um acabamento mate, então as reflexões de luzes artificiais brilhantes nunca deveriam ser um problema.
No lado positivo, o Vostro 15-5581 tem potência suficiente para lidar com todas as tarefas de escritório e até mesmo com tarefas gráficas mais intensas, graças à sua GPU GeForce MX130. No entanto, o dispositivo não obtém o máximo dos dois componentes, e seu comportamento é muito agressivo para o nosso gosto. No entanto, o Vostro 15-5581 fez avanços a partir de seu antecessor, com mais potência, melhores dispositivos de entrada e maior duração da bateria.
O Dell Vostro 15-5581 é um portátil de 15,6 polegadas mediano. Não irá inspirar as pessoas, mas não foi feito para isso. Simplesmente, vai fazer o trabalho.
No geral, o Vostro 15-5581 se destaca em algumas áreas, como a duração da bateria e o desempenho da CPU. Uma tela nada surpreendente, um ventilador agressivo e um SSD comparativamente lento, estragam o que poderia ter sido um sólido portátil corporativo.
Dell Vostro 15-5581
-
06/17/2019 v6(old)
Nino Ricchizzi
Pricecompare
