Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, SSD, FHD)

Compact gaming racer. O Omen 15 roda todos os jogos de computador atuais fluentemente na tela mate Full HD. A Hewlett-Packard usa um painel IPS de 144 Hz muito responsivo aqui, e o resto do equipamento também está bem: SSD NVMe, 32 GB de memória de trabalho, Thunderbolt 3.

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng (Omen Serie)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1215-1379 MHz, Memoría: 2002 MHz, GDDR5, conexão de 256-bits, Nvidia 417.01, no Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, dual channel, dois slots (ambos ocupados)
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 144 Hz, Nvidia G-Sync, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disco rígido
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 512 GB 
, + HGST HTS721010A9E630, 1433 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 2 DVI, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: porta de áudio combinada, entrada de microfone, Card Reader: SDXC, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 25 x 360 x 263
Bateria
70.07 Wh, 4550 mAh Lítio-Ion, 15.4 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: stereo, Teclado: chiclet, McAfee LiveSafe (trial version), 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.52 kg, Suprimento de energia: 652 g
Preço
2099 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

383 mm 260 mm 29.5 mm 2.5 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.5 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg359 mm 243 mm 22 mm 2 kg358 mm 248 mm 17.9 mm 1.9 kg360 mm 268 mm 15.8 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.8 mm 2.1 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=222)
91.4 MB/s ∼100% +16%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79.1 MB/s ∼87%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼85% -1%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s ∼28% -67%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25 MB/s ∼27% -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=220)
110 MB/s ∼100% +28%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼79% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼78%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s ∼29% -63%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s ∼29% -63%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
694 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
691 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s ∼99% +6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
682 MBit/s ∼98% +5%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
650 (min: 569, max: 693) MBit/s ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=217)
599 MBit/s ∼86% -8%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
585 (min: 484, max: 680) MBit/s ∼84% -10%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
693 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
665 MBit/s ∼96% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
650 (min: 605, max: 668) MBit/s ∼94%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
643 MBit/s ∼93% -1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
642 MBit/s ∼93% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 721, n=217)
546 MBit/s ∼79% -16%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø649 (569-693)
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø630 (484-680)
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (605-668)
274
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
242
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 317 cd/m² Médio: 283.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 76 %
iluminação com acumulador: 317 cd/m²
Contraste: 511:1 (Preto: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.83 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG Neo 15
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-187%
3%
33%
6%
10%
-44%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17 (9, 8)
47.2 (23.6, 23.6)
-178%
16 (9, 7)
6%
7.4 (3.8, 3.6)
56%
13.6 (7.6, 6)
20%
16 (8.4, 7.6)
6%
24.4 (14.4, 10)
-44%
Response Time Black / White *
11 (7, 4)
32.4 (18, 14.4)
-195%
11 (7, 4)
-0%
10 (4.4, 5.6)
9%
12 (7.6, 4.4)
-9%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
13%
15.8 (13.8, 2)
-44%
PWM Frequency
200 (99)
25510 (19)
Screen
-14%
14%
20%
22%
17%
-6%
Brightness middle
317
275
-13%
235
-26%
294
-7%
304.3
-4%
325
3%
292
-8%
Brightness
283
254
-10%
235
-17%
275
-3%
293
4%
303
7%
258
-9%
Brightness Distribution
76
90
18%
85
12%
84
11%
80
5%
90
18%
81
7%
Black Level *
0.62
0.27
56%
0.22
65%
0.24
61%
0.38
39%
0.33
47%
0.23
63%
Contrast
511
1019
99%
1068
109%
1225
140%
801
57%
985
93%
1270
149%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.83
4.62
-63%
2.82
-0%
2.57
9%
1.79
37%
2.69
5%
5.82
-106%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.78
8.05
-39%
4.82
17%
4.88
16%
3.69
36%
4.91
15%
9.05
-57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
4.31
-116%
2.32
-16%
2.41
-21%
1.1
45%
2.34
-17%
4.61
-131%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.49 88%
2.49 88%
2.5 88%
2.27 97%
2.38 92%
2.65 83%
CCT
6493 100%
7000 93%
6310 103%
6370 102%
6665 98%
6872 95%
6950 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
38
-37%
59
-2%
59
-2%
59.8
0%
60
0%
76
27%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
59
-37%
92
-1%
91
-2%
92.8
0%
94
1%
100
8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.59
4.88
2.14
1.27
2.82
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-101% / -43%
9% / 12%
27% / 22%
14% / 19%
14% / 16%
-25% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9603 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - Grayscale
CalMAN - Grayscale
CalMAN - Saturation
CalMAN - Saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.6 ms).
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Intel XTU
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170Tooltip
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø983 (970.71-1067.24)
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng Intel Core i5-8300H, Intel Core i5-8300H: Ø796 (778-805.1)
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø993 (983.33-1046.24)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1004 (937.73-1119.73)
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø924 (911.97-1007.8)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1104 (1087.93-1138.69)
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1024 (1006.34-1167)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11042
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
31360
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6473
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
75.16 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
11.77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.92 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
115.36 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1067 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
169 Points
Ajuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼99% +4%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼99% +4%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points ∼98% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=82)
172 Points ∼98% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
169 Points ∼96%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=463)
154 Points ∼88% -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Core i7-8750H
1167 Points ∼100% +9%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
1154 Points ∼99% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
1120 Points ∼96% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=89)
1108 Points ∼95% +4%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
1100 Points ∼94% +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
1067 Points ∼91%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H
915 Points ∼78% -14%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
805 Points ∼69% -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1979, n=466)
788 Points ∼68% -26%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1.89 - 2, n=40)
1.967 Points ∼99% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.96 Points ∼98% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.94 Points ∼97% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points ∼96%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.89 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=416)
1.685 Points ∼85% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.89 Points ∼100% +10%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.7 Points ∼99% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.44 Points ∼97% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (9.54 - 13.5, n=41)
12.2 Points ∼95% +4%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.77 Points ∼91%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.43 Points ∼89% -3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.68 Points ∼67% -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.4, n=517)
7.37 Points ∼57% -37%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (6236 - 6645, n=24)
6475 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
6473 Points ∼100%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
6440 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.85 - 8872, n=414)
4783 Points ∼74% -26%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (29664 - 35307, n=24)
33176 Points ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
31360 Points ∼95%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
31213 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.7 - 48808, n=414)
17926 Points ∼54% -43%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
22587 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (20725 - 22665, n=12)
21808 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (9307 - 27774, n=66)
15588 Points ∼69% -31%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
4144 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (3734 - 4144, n=12)
3981 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2926 - 4825, n=66)
3643 Points ∼88% -12%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
21175 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (17048 - 22006, n=8)
19665 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (8085 - 26471, n=29)
15155 Points ∼72% -28%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
4997 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (4548 - 4997, n=8)
4839 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (3387 - 5744, n=29)
4476 Points ∼90% -10%
Geekbench 4.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
22614 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (17709 - 23313, n=16)
20935 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4116 - 32070, n=40)
18620 Points ∼82% -18%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
17709 Points ∼78% -22%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
5126 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (4669 - 5126, n=16)
4972 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2131 - 6030, n=40)
4722 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
4669 Points ∼91% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (753 - 7545, n=155)
1231 ms * ∼100% -12%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H (EDGE: 42.17134.1.0)
1173.7 ms * ∼95% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (695 - 1272, n=47)
1113 ms * ∼90% -1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1100 ms * ∼89%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
1088.4 ms * ∼88% +1%
Octane V2 - Total Score
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
35283 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
34795 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (27460 - 44549, n=44)
34058 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H (EDGE: 42.17134.1.0)
33963 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (12288 - 49518, n=149)
32890 Points ∼93% -7%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
259.17 Points ∼100% +7%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H (EDGE: 42.17134.1.0)
249.83 Points ∼96% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (51.6 - 333, n=153)
249 Points ∼96% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (205 - 299, n=46)
247 Points ∼95% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
241.85 Points ∼93%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
7168 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5130 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5908 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5818 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
7303 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (5793 - 7303, n=9)
6468 Points ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6355 Points ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
6200 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11191, n=155)
6167 Points ∼84% -16%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5970 Points ∼82% -18%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5793 Points ∼79% -21%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4980 Points ∼68% -32%
Productivity
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
7532 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7390 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (7032 - 7793, n=9)
7324 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7162 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 8968, n=156)
7075 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7065 Points ∼94% -6%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
7030 Points ∼93% -7%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
7030 Points ∼93% -7%
Essentials
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
9270 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8770 Points ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
8712 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 10668, n=157)
8224 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (6838 - 9270, n=9)
8199 Points ∼88% -12%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
8085 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8051 Points ∼87% -13%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7853 Points ∼85% -15%
Score
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5728 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (4910 - 5728, n=9)
5223 Points ∼91% -9%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5191 Points ∼91% -9%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5184 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5170 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=158)
5091 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4910 Points ∼86% -14%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4707 Points ∼82% -18%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5818 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5706 Points ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5705 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5669 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5651 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (5323 - 5818, n=10)
5628 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
5362 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
5210 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=347)
4981 Points ∼86% -14%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5130 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4650 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4620 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (4393 - 5130, n=10)
4599 Points ∼90% -10%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
4585 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4446 Points ∼87% -13%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
4271 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=365)
4244 Points ∼83% -17%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4109 Points ∼80% -20%
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Sequential Read: 1407 MB/s
Sequential Write: 523.9 MB/s
512K Read: 643.4 MB/s
512K Write: 523.9 MB/s
4K Read: 13.6 MB/s
4K Write: 112.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 598.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 522.5 MB/s
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
Average Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-37%
27%
48%
75%
97%
-25%
31%
Write 4K
87.51
77.11
-12%
89.19
2%
98.17
12%
97.93
12%
100.5
15%
66.42
-24%
112 (79.1 - 149, n=11)
28%
Read 4K
16.08
29.51
84%
34.36
114%
39.43
145%
41.32
157%
48.64
202%
29.59
84%
33.5 (16.1 - 43.6, n=11)
108%
Write Seq
614.2
130.9
-79%
949.4
55%
1386
126%
1594
160%
1456
137%
477.9
-22%
627 (250 - 1342, n=11)
2%
Read Seq
1341
856.9
-36%
898.9
-33%
1100
-18%
1353
1%
1278
-5%
514.8
-62%
1558 (276 - 2335, n=11)
16%
Write 4K Q32T1
307.9
104.1
-66%
371.4
21%
270.3
-12%
305.6
-1%
298.1
-3%
180.2
-41%
398 (266 - 518, n=11)
29%
Read 4K Q32T1
358.4
195.8
-45%
399
11%
340.3
-5%
354.1
-1%
348.7
-3%
199.5
-44%
435 (258 - 773, n=11)
21%
Write Seq Q32T1
525.2
130.8
-75%
1035.1
97%
1454
177%
2033
287%
2742
422%
497.6
-5%
799 (459 - 2969, n=11)
52%
Read Seq Q32T1
3077
1096
-64%
1603.3
-48%
1681
-45%
2543
-17%
3389
10%
546.5
-82%
2928 (1783 - 3228, n=11)
-5%
Write 4K Q8T8
760.2
886 (527 - 1246, n=2)
Read 4K Q8T8
810.5
1060 (722 - 1397, n=2)
AS SSD
-69%
65%
48%
146%
123%
-27%
68%
Copy Game MB/s
980.13
621.52
-37%
882.4
-10%
706 (458 - 1173, n=10)
-28%
Copy Program MB/s
30.89
306.93
894%
370.7
1100%
382 (30.9 - 570, n=10)
1137%
Copy ISO MB/s
1632.25
840.06
-49%
1452.41
-11%
1127 (585 - 1963, n=10)
-31%
Score Total
2091
670
-68%
2233
7%
3294
58%
4095
96%
5224
150%
1071
-49%
2175 (1157 - 4406, n=14)
4%
Score Write
668
195
-71%
773
16%
1515
127%
1955
193%
2423
263%
409
-39%
678 (119 - 1733, n=14)
1%
Score Read
994
343
-65%
960
-3%
1161
17%
1407
42%
1837
85%
432
-57%
1047 (733 - 1773, n=14)
5%
Access Time Write *
0.063
0.227
-260%
0.044
30%
0.036
43%
0.037
41%
0.034
46%
0.051
19%
0.1736 (0.026 - 1.066, n=14)
-176%
Access Time Read *
0.126
0.177
-40%
0.104
17%
0.129
-2%
0.05
60%
0.038
70%
0.101
20%
0.0939 (0.05 - 0.2, n=14)
25%
4K-64 Write
484.41
103.63
-79%
602.1
24%
1285.25
165%
1663.95
244%
2085.05
330%
294.33
-39%
515 (86 - 1350, n=14)
6%
4K-64 Read
729.91
187.79
-74%
838.97
15%
1030.22
41%
1176.71
61%
1597.87
119%
348.58
-52%
795 (528 - 1464, n=14)
9%
4K Write
99.28
79.31
-20%
84.45
-15%
103.63
4%
99.18
0%
105.97
7%
68.58
-31%
91.4 (4.25 - 154, n=14)
-8%
4K Read
21.24
31.48
48%
36.43
72%
40.02
88%
48.56
129%
48.03
126%
32.36
52%
29.4 (21.2 - 52.8, n=14)
38%
Seq Write
842.61
123.53
-85%
869.07
3%
1260.72
50%
1916.59
127%
2323.76
176%
462.8
-45%
716 (261 - 2294, n=14)
-15%
Seq Read
2432.33
1237.74
-49%
849.69
-65%
903.24
-63%
1819.95
-25%
1914.52
-21%
512.05
-79%
2106 (1408 - 2612, n=14)
-13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-53% / -56%
46% / 51%
48% / 48%
111% / 120%
110% / 112%
-26% / -26%
50% / 55%

* ... smaller is better

3DMark 06 Standard
35269 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
16908 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
165902 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34535 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12877 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
6571 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
4856 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
23061 Points ∼100% +20%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
19187 Points ∼83%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (17680 - 20829, n=18)
19016 Points ∼82% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18296 Points ∼79% -5%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18234 Points ∼79% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
14367 Points ∼62% -25%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
14180 Points ∼61% -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=564)
12703 Points ∼55% -34%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8300H
9266 Points ∼40% -52%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=107)
5442 Points ∼100% +16%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
4734 Points ∼87% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
4708 Points ∼87%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (4548 - 4795, n=5)
4687 Points ∼86% 0%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
17720 Points ∼100% +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (14146 - 16165, n=16)
14910 Points ∼84% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
14724 Points ∼83%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
14463 Points ∼82% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
11558 Points ∼65% -22%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
11315 Points ∼64% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=488)
10851 Points ∼61% -26%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8300H
7576 Points ∼43% -49%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
101453 Points ∼100%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
99921 Points ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (73739 - 107807, n=16)
97317 Points ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
81178 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
80748 Points ∼80% -20%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
73739 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=473)
64304 Points ∼63% -37%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8300H
49254 Points ∼49% -51%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 313.8279.9256139.4fps
GTA V (2015) 166.7159.8145.964.6fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 251170.897.755.3fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 126.9118.2111.7109.7fps
World of Warships (2015) 205.4169.8146.3140.7fps
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) 150.1110.877.668.5fps
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) 167.3106.4100.989.9fps
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 128.4126.3122120.8fps
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 158.362.745.731.9fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 152.6137.4130.8111fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 10996.581.1fps
Monster Hunter World (2018) 156.588.480.460.3fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 130787261fps
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) 169.810598.993.3fps
Hitman 2 (2018) 9280.574.868.8fps
Battlefield V (2018) 140.780.67064.7fps
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 214.4167.6110.489.6fps
Darksiders III (2018) 169.283.968.359.7fps
Just Cause 4 (2018) 126.186.178.875.7fps
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
60.6 fps ∼100% +10%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
55.3 fps ∼91%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
51.5 (min: 45, max: 58) fps ∼85% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (46 - 55.3, n=19)
51.5 fps ∼85% -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
49.2 fps ∼81% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=261)
47.5 fps ∼78% -14%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
38.6 fps ∼64% -30%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
37 fps ∼61% -33%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
24.2 fps ∼40% -56%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
139.4 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (110 - 139, n=10)
127 fps ∼91% -9%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
118 (min: 22, max: 273) fps ∼85% -15%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
109.8 fps ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=302)
92.6 fps ∼66% -34%
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; The Witcher 3: Ø53.7 (49-58)
GPU values measured during The Witcher 3 test.
GPU values measured during The Witcher 3 test.

Barulho

Ocioso
30.6 / 30.6 / 32.2 dB
Carga
47.2 / 42.3 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.132.832.631.834.12536.432.534.530.736.43137.334.432.632.937.34030.730.529.430.230.75031.229.630.53031.26334.327.629.927.834.38028.226.827.427.428.210027.526.527.226.527.512533.132.132.325.833.116027.326.224.225.327.320027.626.523.622.727.625028.425.723.122.728.431530.428.321.72230.44003129.221.1213150029.426.420.620.129.463031.12820.919.831.180033.829.921.518.933.8100037.433.522.118.337.4125037.333.621.21837.316003934.220.418.139200036.830.718.817.936.8250037.231.219.418.137.2315033.72818.718.133.7400034.328.618.918.334.3500033.928.418.918.433.9630033.327.618.918.633.3800028.622.318.918.828.61000027.521.218.818.827.51250022.520.518.818.622.51600020.320.218.918.720.3SPL47.242.332.230.947.2N5.43.71.61.35.4median 31.1median 28median 20.6median 18.8median 31.1Delta3.31.92.11.73.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen 15-dc0015ng
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Schenker XMG Neo 15
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-7%
2%
-12%
-0%
-14%
-10%
-2%
-2%
off / environment *
30.6
29
5%
30.7
-0%
29
5%
28.1
8%
29
5%
30
2%
29.4 (28 - 30.7, n=15)
4%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=264)
4%
Idle Minimum *
30.6
29
5%
32.1
-5%
33
-8%
28.1
8%
29
5%
30
2%
30.5 (28.5 - 33, n=16)
-0%
31.5 (28 - 41.7, n=687)
-3%
Idle Average *
30.6
33
-8%
32.1
-5%
34
-11%
33
-8%
35
-14%
35
-14%
31.8 (28.5 - 37, n=16)
-4%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=687)
-7%
Idle Maximum *
32.2
41
-27%
32.4
-1%
40
-24%
33.5
-4%
40
-24%
36
-12%
34.6 (28.6 - 43, n=16)
-7%
34.7 (28 - 51, n=687)
-8%
Load Average *
47.2
44
7%
39
17%
47
-0%
42.2
11%
50
-6%
42
11%
43.2 (35.2 - 49, n=16)
8%
40.5 (30.3 - 58, n=688)
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
41.7
47
-13%
51
-22%
45.3
-9%
53
-27%
54
-29%
Load Maximum *
42.3
49
-16%
40.2
5%
53
-25%
45.7
-8%
58
-37%
56
-32%
48.2 (40.2 - 54.2, n=16)
-14%
47.8 (38.9 - 64.1, n=688)
-13%

* ... smaller is better

 45.1 °C48.1 °C43.1 °C 
 40.2 °C49.7 °C40.3 °C 
 29.5 °C27.6 °C30.9 °C 
Máximo: 49.7 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C
43.6 °C42.1 °C43.6 °C
31.1 °C48 °C42.8 °C
27.6 °C27.1 °C28.2 °C
Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  43.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 41.8 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-5.3 °C / -9.5 F).
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Schenker XMG Neo 15
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-9%
4%
-4%
-5%
-7%
5%
-1%
4%
Maximum Upper Side *
49.7
51
-3%
46.6
6%
54
-9%
51.2
-3%
56
-13%
48
3%
52.1 (46.6 - 58, n=16)
-5%
45.7 (28 - 68.8, n=653)
8%
Maximum Bottom *
48
58
-21%
56.6
-18%
60
-25%
55.2
-15%
68
-42%
49
-2%
57.3 (41.2 - 65, n=16)
-19%
49.3 (25.9 - 78, n=651)
-3%
Idle Upper Side *
32
35
-9%
28.8
10%
30
6%
31
3%
28
12%
29
9%
29.2 (24 - 33, n=16)
9%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=604)
4%
Idle Bottom *
34
35
-3%
28.5
16%
30
12%
35.6
-5%
29
15%
31
9%
29.9 (25 - 34, n=16)
12%
31.5 (21.1 - 50.3, n=602)
7%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203131.8312531.430.731.4313532.9354030.430.230.45029.93029.9632827.8288027.727.427.710027.926.527.912533.725.833.71604025.34020046.622.746.625044.622.744.631555.62255.640064.92164.950062.720.162.763063.819.863.88006818.968100063.418.363.4125061.41861.4160067.618.167.6200065.917.965.9250062.118.162.1315060.318.160.3400059.518.359.5500063.118.463.163006618.666800070.618.870.61000069.318.869.31250067.118.667.11600059.218.759.2SPL77.430.977.4N37.81.337.8median 62.7median 18.8median 62.7Delta7.81.77.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 15-dc0015ngApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%