Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do HP Omen 15: gamer acessível de nível de entrada com uma duração de bateria decente

Bem balanceado. Graças à sua CPU Core i5-9300H e GPU GeForce GTX 1650, o Omen 15 é capaz de rodar todos os jogos atuais fluentemente em sua tela IPS FHD de 15,6 polegadas e, como bônus, vem com um SSD NVMe e uma duração de bateria decente. Se apenas a tela não estivesse tão fraca.
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (Omen 15-dc Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-9300H 4 x 2.4 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1560 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, GDDR5, 128-bit bus, Nvidia 431.36, Optimus
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR4-2666, single-channel, dois slots (um ocupado)
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD05CE, IPS, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disco rígido
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, 512 GB 
, 446 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones, conector para microfone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, Sensores: acelerômetro, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 25 x 360 x 263
Bateria
52.5 Wh, 4550 mAh Lítio-Ion, 11.55 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, McAfee Live Safe (versão de avaliação), 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.317 kg, Suprimento de energia: 445 g
Preço
979 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

363 mm 255 mm 27 mm 2.2 kg364.3 mm 273.4 mm 23.7 mm 2.7 kg360.4 mm 262 mm 26.8 mm 2.2 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 252 mm 20.4 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=102, last 2 years)
98.1 MB/s +22%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.5 MB/s
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.4 MB/s -3%
Dell G5 15 5590
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.1 MB/s -76%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (26 - 269, n=93, last 2 years)
122.2 MB/s +40%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.3 MB/s -2%
Dell G5 15 5590
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32.2 MB/s -63%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=7, last 2 years)
1147 MBit/s +69%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
642 (581min - 693max) MBit/s -6%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
617 MBit/s -9%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
601 (562min - 639max) MBit/s -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
252 MBit/s -63%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=7, last 2 years)
1391 MBit/s +115%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
671 MBit/s +4%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
666 (597min - 686max) MBit/s +3%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
657 (556min - 690max) MBit/s +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
646 MBit/s
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
586 MBit/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
332 MBit/s -49%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø657 (556-690)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø666 (597-686)
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø642 (581-693)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø601 (562-639)
263
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
214
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
216
cd/m²
216
cd/m²
222
cd/m²
200
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LGD05CE tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 263 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 231.7 cd/m² Minimum: 20.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 76 %
iluminação com acumulador: 216 cd/m²
Contraste: 1476:1 (Preto: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
57.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.37% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell G5 15 5590
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF FX505DY
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
64%
3%
5%
-1%
2%
4%
Display P3 Coverage
38.37
63.8
66%
39.56
3%
40.33
5%
37.97
-1%
39.26
2%
40.04
4%
sRGB Coverage
57.6
93.4
62%
59.5
3%
60.6
5%
57
-1%
59.1
3%
60.2
5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
39.69
65
64%
40.91
3%
41.69
5%
39.23
-1%
40.56
2%
41.4
4%
Response Times
64%
16%
10%
2%
-7%
-8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 ?(21.2, 18.8)
14 ?(7, 7)
65%
30.4 ?(14, 16.4)
24%
34 ?(17.2, 16.8)
15%
42 ?(20.8, 21.2)
-5%
45 ?(22, 23)
-13%
44.8 ?(18.8, 26)
-12%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 ?(17.2, 12.4)
11 ?(7, 4)
63%
27.6 ?(17.6, 10)
7%
28 ?(17.2, 10.8)
5%
26.8 ?(16, 10.8)
9%
30 ?(17, 13)
-1%
30.8 ?(17.6, 13.2)
-4%
PWM Frequency
21280 ?(34)
20830 ?(30)
Screen
21%
-8%
-5%
7%
-12%
-0%
Brightness middle
251
316
26%
286.2
14%
240.1
-4%
238
-5%
234
-7%
211.5
-16%
Brightness
232
295
27%
267
15%
231
0%
226
-3%
219
-6%
200
-14%
Brightness Distribution
76
84
11%
84
11%
85
12%
83
9%
82
8%
82
8%
Black Level *
0.17
0.42
-147%
0.33
-94%
0.34
-100%
0.27
-59%
0.17
-0%
0.23
-35%
Contrast
1476
752
-49%
867
-41%
706
-52%
881
-40%
1376
-7%
920
-38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.2
2.7
56%
5.45
12%
4.2
32%
4.11
34%
8.6
-39%
3.92
37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
18.6
5.65
70%
18.08
3%
17.8
4%
6.89
63%
17.49
6%
17.63
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.8
1.58
67%
4.47
7%
4.09
15%
3.76
22%
4.06
15%
4.16
13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.2
2.35
44%
5.3
-26%
2.8
33%
1.78
58%
8.55
-104%
3.1
26%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.41 91%
2.1 105%
2.2 100%
2.41 91%
3.02 73%
2.23 99%
CCT
7454 87%
6904 94%
7679 85%
6925 94%
6311 103%
7802 83%
6578 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.5
60
64%
37.6
3%
38.4
5%
36
-1%
37
1%
38.1
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57.4
93
62%
59.1
3%
60.4
5%
57
-1%
59
3%
60
5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
50% / 34%
4% / -3%
3% / -1%
3% / 5%
-6% / -9%
-1% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Omen vs. AdobeRGB
Omen vs. AdobeRGB
Omen vs. sRGB
Omen vs. sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18080 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
 
060120180240300360420480540600660720780840900960102010801140Tooltip
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø748 (730.55-769.02)
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø741 (732.32-778.15)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø790 (787.28-796.5)
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø707 (700.72-757)
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1144 (1121.11-1191.01)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1006 (997.68-1086.13)
CPU clock speeds during the CineBench R15 loop
CPU clock speeds during the CineBench R15 loop
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6539
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
24623
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6575
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
769 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
97.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Ajuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=241, last 2 years)
266 Points +56%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (169 - 176, n=11)
172.6 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
165 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
157 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=242, last 2 years)
3024 Points +293%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
1191 Points +55%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
1082 Points +41%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points +5%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
799 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (717 - 850, n=11)
784 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
769 Points
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
757 Points -2%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (6257 - 15819, n=23, last 2 years)
9174 Points +40%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (6421 - 6677, n=5)
6561 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
6539 Points
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
6338 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4770 Points -27%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (37321 - 112749, n=23, last 2 years)
60072 Points +144%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
34465 Points +40%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
24623 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (21798 - 25656, n=5)
24198 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
20687 Points -16%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=237, last 2 years)
693 Points +65%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
419 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (398 - 427, n=9)
415 Points -1%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
403 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
386 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
340 Points -19%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=237, last 2 years)
7255 Points +321%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
2707 Points +57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1825 Points +6%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1793 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (1530 - 1877, n=9)
1727 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
1723 Points
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
21920 Points +44%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (14195 - 16101, n=4)
15338 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
15170 Points
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
3868 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (3596 - 4109, n=4)
3854 Points +4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
3700 Points
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (31241 - 71700, n=27, last 2 years)
48749 Points +215%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
20450 Points +32%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)
17684 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (14853 - 17684, n=7)
16246 Points +5%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
15458 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
11396 Points -26%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5986 - 8936, n=27, last 2 years)
7577 Points +60%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)
5089 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (4704 - 5089, n=7)
4898 Points +3%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
4744 Points
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
4723 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3898 Points -18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1162 ms * -5%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (1079 - 1349, n=8)
1138 ms * -3%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1137 ms * -3%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H (Edge 44)
1107 ms *
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
847 ms * +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 824, n=214, last 2 years)
522 ms * +53%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (69893 - 111243, n=52, last 2 years)
91826 Points +167%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
37088 Points +8%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H (Edge 44)
34350 Points
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
33522 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (22225 - 34957, n=7)
32344 Points -6%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
30675 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
30577 Points -11%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (357 - 650, n=28, last 2 years)
491 Points +106%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
243.8 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H (Edge 44)
238.9 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (150.3 - 254, n=7)
231 Points -3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
219 Points -8%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
218.1 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
213.1 Points -11%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
6369 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3691 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3609 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5107 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
4873 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=203, last 2 years)
7573 Points +55%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5609 Points +15%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)
5150 Points +6%
Dell G5 15 5590
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G
5069 Points +4%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4973 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
4873 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (4400 - 5150, n=8)
4817 Points -1%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4732 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4322 Points -11%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=202, last 2 years)
10701 Points +25%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9859 Points +15%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)
9161 Points +7%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8819 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (8108 - 9161, n=8)
8670 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
8575 Points
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8355 Points -3%
Dell G5 15 5590
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G
8308 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7424 Points -13%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (7244 - 11833, n=202, last 2 years)
9729 Points +34%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)
7809 Points +8%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7328 Points +1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7310 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
7261 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (5633 - 7809, n=8)
6986 Points -4%
Dell G5 15 5590
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G
6808 Points -6%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6518 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6305 Points -13%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=202, last 2 years)
11407 Points +126%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6631 Points +31%
Dell G5 15 5590
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G
6252 Points +24%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5282 Points +5%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)
5182 Points +3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5178 Points +3%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5044 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (4717 - 5182, n=8)
5021 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4682 Points -7%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4166 - 6657, n=36, last 2 years)
5264 Points +43%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5077 Points +38%
Dell G5 15 5590
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G
4165 Points +13%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3917 Points +6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
3691 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (3416 - 3848, n=5)
3666 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3642 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4622 - 7085, n=35, last 2 years)
6098 Points +19%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5857 Points +15%
Dell G5 15 5590
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G
5291 Points +4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5107 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4956 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (4556 - 5107, n=5)
4953 Points -3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4701 Points -8%
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
Sequential Read: 1917 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1747 MB/s
512K Read: 1358 MB/s
512K Write: 1058 MB/s
4K Read: 30.23 MB/s
4K Write: 140.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 589 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 508 MB/s
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Dell G5 15 5590
KBG30ZMS128G
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Average WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-21%
-26%
-23%
-64%
-14%
23%
Write 4K
112.1
137.5
23%
132.2
18%
109.1
-3%
64.3
-43%
50.2
-55%
183.3 ?(112.1 - 270, n=8)
64%
Read 4K
42.01
57
36%
55.5
32%
42.05
0%
29.3
-30%
35.32
-16%
48.2 ?(42 - 53.6, n=8)
15%
Write Seq
1964
984
-50%
986
-50%
1457
-26%
131.1
-93%
991
-50%
2135 ?(1715 - 2583, n=8)
9%
Read Seq
2065
1564
-24%
1318
-36%
1421
-31%
776
-62%
1526
-26%
2102 ?(1753 - 2464, n=8)
2%
Write 4K Q32T1
318.2
237.4
-25%
220.3
-31%
287.8
-10%
96.8
-70%
445.1
40%
452 ?(318 - 805, n=8)
42%
Read 4K Q32T1
406.7
340.7
-16%
315.5
-22%
317.9
-22%
198.6
-51%
526
29%
619 ?(407 - 1014, n=8)
52%
Write Seq Q32T1
2534
959
-62%
987
-61%
1455
-43%
127.8
-95%
1647
-35%
2537 ?(2519 - 2548, n=8)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3438
1732
-50%
1416
-59%
1739
-49%
1044
-70%
3427
0%
3466 ?(3438 - 3481, n=8)
1%
3D Mark 11 (single-channel mode)
3D Mark 11 (single-channel mode)
3D Mark 11 (dual-channel mode)
3D Mark 11 (dual-channel mode)
3D Mark 11 (single-channel mode, battery)
3D Mark 11 (single-channel mode, battery)
3DMark 06 Standard Score
32694 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
11257 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
71342 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22167 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8075 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3573 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=241, last 2 years)
39928 Points +197%
Dell G5 15 5590
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
20196 Points +50%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
17170 Points +28%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
14723 Points +9%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
13575 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)
13512 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
13447 Points
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
13125 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (10885 - 13575, n=30)
12797 Points -5%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
9466 Points -30%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
8741 Points -35%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
8181 Points -39%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=150, last 2 years)
135325 Points +136%
Dell G5 15 5590
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
95292 Points +66%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
72026 Points +26%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
57365 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (38016 - 66073, n=21)
55346 Points -4%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
50801 Points -11%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
49314 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
44557 Points -22%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
40948 Points -29%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
35511 Points -38%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=245, last 2 years)
29195 Points +206%
Dell G5 15 5590
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
15415 Points +62%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
13355 Points +40%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
11563 Points +21%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
9536 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)
9534 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9428 Points -1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
9292 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (7741 - 9810, n=32)
9195 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
7791 Points -18%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
7324 Points -23%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
6327 Points -34%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=243, last 2 years)
11907 Points +234%
Dell G5 15 5590
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
5977 Points +68%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4867 Points +37%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3568 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
3565 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)
3547 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (2900 - 3700, n=31)
3430 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
2536 Points -29%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
1790 Points -50%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
136.9 fps +56%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
115.8 fps +32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
102.3 fps +17%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel-Modus)
90.8 fps +4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
87.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (68.5 - 99.4, n=18)
86.4 fps -1%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
73.9 fps -16%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
53.1 fps -39%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=172, last 2 years)
216 fps +247%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
105.2 fps +69%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
83.9 fps +35%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
62.7 fps +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
62.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (45 - 70.4, n=29)
61.7 fps -1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
61.1 (51min) fps -2%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
38.5 fps -38%
Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (82 - 131, n=5, last 2 years)
103 fps +119%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
72 fps +53%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel-Modus)
55 fps +17%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
53 (37min) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (40 - 56, n=6)
49.8 fps +6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
47 fps
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=253, last 2 years)
100.8 fps +83%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel-Modus)
64.7 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (44.5 - 77.3, n=18)
61.5 fps +12%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
55 fps
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=248, last 2 years)
141.2 fps +72%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
105.8 (93.9min) fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (58.5 - 119, n=20)
93.2 fps +14%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel-Modus)
89.9 fps +10%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
82 (70.2min) fps
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G: Ø37.2 (33-41)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø45 (37-48)
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø36.9 (34-39)
Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G: Ø60.1 (36-65)
GPU data during the Witcher 3 test
GPU data during the Witcher 3 test
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 213.6 200.3 190.4 87.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 157.1 109.6 62.2 37
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 114 103 89 82
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 78 62 55
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 60 53 52 47
Rage 2 (2019) 117 97 74 60
F1 2019 (2019) 128 97 74 60

Barulho

Ocioso
28.8 / 29.5 / 31.1 dB
Carga
35.2 / 41 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2026.526.629.830.829.732.231.22525.82628.12525.523.525.33124.725.824.527.624.725.631.74026.823.826.92823.825.230.75023.323.325.123.322.724.323.96323.122.924.822.22422.822.48023.721.823.121.722.721.323.4100222323.921.62321.523.912522.32323.721.722.421.622.216022.322.223.322.422.222.321.220023.123.222.721.220.721.421.225023.423.422.621.422.321.32231523.222.621.920.720.720.520.540025.422.922.620.6202020.450028.425.624.120.720.819.520.963027.326.624.520.519.618.919.680028.826.423.920.319.318.419.4100030.32825.620.518.917.920125030.828.925.920.418.217.218160031.729.826.320.117.316.417.3200032.828.524.519.216.71616.6250030.927.423.717.916.215.916315025.822.419.616.115.715.415.6400028.324.621.717.615.815.415.6500026.723.220.316.215.41515.3630025.321.818.815.515.21515.1800021.918.516.715.115.114.915.11000019.216.71614.814.914.914.9125001615.315.414.614.714.714.81600014.914.715.414.614.514.414.7SPL4138.235.230.729.528.829.5N3.52.72.21.41.31.21.3median 25.4median 23.2median 22.7median 20.3median 18.2median 17.2median 18Delta3.33.42.42.42.732.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen 15-dc1020ng
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Dell G5 15 5590
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-12%
-9%
-17%
-14%
-10%
-4%
-3%
off / environment *
28.8
30.5
-6%
28.2
2%
28
3%
30
-4%
30.4
-6%
27.6 ?(24 - 30.8, n=23)
4%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=188, last 2 years)
16%
Idle Minimum *
28.8
32.8
-14%
28.2
2%
29.4
-2%
30
-4%
30.4
-6%
28.1 ?(24 - 33.6, n=23)
2%
25.7 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=189, last 2 years)
11%
Idle Average *
29.5
32.8
-11%
28.2
4%
31.9
-8%
31
-5%
30.4
-3%
28.8 ?(24 - 33.6, n=23)
2%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=189, last 2 years)
7%
Idle Maximum *
31.1
32.8
-5%
31.4
-1%
33
-6%
33
-6%
33.4
-7%
31 ?(24 - 39, n=23)
-0%
30.8 ?(21.9 - 47, n=189, last 2 years)
1%
Load Average *
35.2
42.5
-21%
39.8
-13%
41.2
-17%
46
-31%
42
-19%
41.7 ?(30.1 - 53, n=23)
-18%
43 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=189, last 2 years)
-22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
35.2
47
-34%
53.8
-53%
46
-31%
Load Maximum *
41
47.5
-16%
50.2
-22%
55.7
-36%
49
-20%
48.7
-19%
46.4 ?(36.3 - 53, n=23)
-13%
53.3 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=189, last 2 years)
-30%

* ... smaller is better

 39.5 °C40.3 °C39.3 °C 
 35.9 °C40.3 °C39.4 °C 
 25 °C28.3 °C27.7 °C 
Máximo: 40.3 °C
Médio: 35.1 °C
47.5 °C40.2 °C48.5 °C
40.9 °C43.8 °C35.6 °C
25.2 °C27.5 °C24.2 °C
Máximo: 48.5 °C
Médio: 37 °C
alimentação elétrica  54.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.3 °C / 0.5 F).
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Dell G5 15 5590
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-33%
-17%
-34%
-6%
-13%
-13%
-21%
Maximum Upper Side *
40.3
47.6
-18%
41.2
-2%
55.8
-38%
47
-17%
51.5
-28%
46 ?(39.8 - 52.8, n=23)
-14%
46.3 ?(28.2 - 61, n=189, last 2 years)
-15%
Maximum Bottom *
48.5
59.6
-23%
40
18%
58.2
-20%
50
-3%
48.3
-0%
49.2 ?(36.5 - 58.7, n=23)
-1%
49.8 ?(30 - 66.3, n=189, last 2 years)
-3%
Idle Upper Side *
23.9
33.8
-41%
34.6
-45%
33.4
-40%
24
-0%
27.2
-14%
28.3 ?(22.9 - 35, n=23)
-18%
31.5 ?(21.2 - 43, n=189, last 2 years)
-32%
Idle Bottom *
24.6
36.5
-48%
34.4
-40%
33.6
-37%
25
-2%
27.4
-11%
28.9 ?(23 - 37.4, n=23)
-17%
32.7 ?(22.6 - 45, n=189, last 2 years)
-33%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.229.12523.525.93125.628.54025.226.25024.323.36322.823.48021.322.710021.522.712521.622.416022.327.320021.441.625021.34931520.5494002055.250019.556.863018.957.980018.458.6100017.957.1125017.252.4160016.461.420001658.1250015.953.3315015.456.2400015.456.950001560.163001559.8800014.961.81000014.964.21250014.765.31600014.459.3SPL28.871.1N1.227.9median 17.2median 56.9Delta37.343.346.739.640.532.43334.442.327.231.329.327.427.728.626.830.923.433.522.745.122.952.123.554.619.958.919.76519.269.917.970.51870.717.872.618.967.317.869.317.465.817.765.717.765.217.861.117.558.617.552.617.457.717.359.517.360.417.355.230.278.91.443.2median 17.8median 60.41.56.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 15-dc1020ngAcer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.09 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.04 / 7.2 / 11.4 Watt
Carga midlight 80.8 / 144.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Dell G5 15 5590
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-103%
-16%
-57%
-2%
-8%
-13%
-130%
Idle Minimum *
4.04
14.7
-264%
7
-73%
7.4
-83%
5
-24%
3.5
13%
4.96 ?(2 - 13, n=23)
-23%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=184, last 2 years)
-242%
Idle Average *
7.2
18.6
-158%
9.9
-38%
8.6
-19%
7
3%
6.9
4%
8.61 ?(5.3 - 15.7, n=23)
-20%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=184, last 2 years)
-165%
Idle Maximum *
11.4
22.6
-98%
12
-5%
39.1
-243%
11
4%
8.5
25%
14.8 ?(8.9 - 30.6, n=23)
-30%
26.6 ?(9 - 101.1, n=184, last 2 years)
-133%
Load Average *
80.8
90
-11%
68.4
15%
65.9
18%
89
-10%
127
-57%
81.7 ?(57 - 128, n=23)
-1%
111 ?(32.1 - 202, n=184, last 2 years)
-37%
Witcher 3 ultra *
93.6
94.9
-1%
106.9
-14%
90
4%
Load Maximum *
144.5
120
17%
130.9
9%
141.3
2%
132
9%
179
-24%
131.9 ?(80 - 192.2, n=23)
9%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=183, last 2 years)
-73%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
15h 51min
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
0h 59min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)
6h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 11min
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 52.5 Wh
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 48 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 76 Wh
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 57 Wh
Dell G5 15 5590
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-18%
31%
20%
39%
-40%
-2%
Reader / Idle
951
466
-51%
916
-4%
1044
10%
890
-6%
301
-68%
541 ?(57 - 1290, n=87, last 2 years)
-43%
H.264
482
506
5%
391 ?(56 - 747, n=95, last 2 years)
-19%
WiFi v1.3
385
285
-26%
482
25%
486
26%
463
20%
197
-49%
364 ?(57 - 745, n=188, last 2 years)
-5%
Witcher 3 ultra
59
81.6 ?(47 - 155, n=22, last 2 years)
38%
Load
71
87
23%
123
73%
88
24%
168
137%
69
-3%
85.5 ?(36 - 173, n=150, last 2 years)
20%

Pro

+ Painel IPS mate
+ SSD NVMe
+ Baia de unidade de 2,5 polegadas
+ Permaneceu moderadamente morno
+ Não muito barulhento
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Teclado iluminado
+ Fácil manutenção

Contra

- Tela escura
- Baixa cobertura do espaço de cores
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- RAM de um canal
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (7DT48EA). Review unit courtesy of Cyberport.
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (7DT48EA). Review unit courtesy of Cyberport.

No momento deste artigo, o HP Omen 15-dc1020ng era o portátil Omen 15 mais acessível. Cerca de US $ 1.000 te dão um portátil para jogos Core i5-9300HGeForce GTX 1650 capaz de rodar todos os jogos atuais fluentemente em sua tela em resolução FHD e detalhes médios. Alguns jogos inclusive permitiram configurações e resoluções mais altas. Para obter o máximo do sistema, aconselhamos adicionar um segundo módulo de memória para ativar o modo de canal duplo.

O dispositivo permanece razoavelmente frio e silencioso, independentemente da carga de trabalho, particularmente em casos de uso ocioso e de carga baixa a média. Também oferece uma duração de bateria decente de aproximadamente 6,5 horas ao navegar na Web ou 8 horas ao assistir a filmes.

O atual modelo de nível básico da Hewlett Packard, o Omen 15, é um portátil para jogos bem equilibrado a um preço moderado.

A HP também optou por um rápido SSD NVMe de 512 GB, que pode ser atualizado para um dispositivo de armazenamento mais espaçoso. Além disso, os usuários podem adicionar um SSD ou HD secundário de 2,5 polegadas. Um compartimento de armazenamento e um quadro de montagem estão incluídos por padrão.

O painel IPS FHD mate oferece amplos ângulos de visão e uma relação de contraste decente. No entanto, seu brilho máximo é muito baixo e ainda mais reduzido com a bateria, e a cobertura do espaço de cores foi decepcionante, por dizer o mínimo. Esperamos mais de um portátil na faixa de preço do Omen 15. O teclado é utilizável e inclui uma luz de fundo. Infelizmente, o Omen 15 não possui o Thunderbolt 3, o que teria permitido o uso de uma GPU externa mais potente.

HP Omen 15-dc1020ng - 09/20/2019 v7
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
66 / 80 → 82%
Peso
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Bateria
73 / 95 → 77%
Pantalha
80%
Desempenho do jogos
84%
Desempenho da aplicação
86%
Temperatura
89 / 95 → 94%
Ruído
92 / 90 → 100%
Audio
61%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Médio
75%
82%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do HP Omen 15: gamer acessível de nível de entrada com uma duração de bateria decente
Sascha Mölck, 2019-07-25 (Update: 2019-07-25)