Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 15t 2017 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti, Full HD)

Sebastian Bade (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/08/2017

Uma atualização, alguém? Levou algum tempo, mas agora a HP forneceu ao seu modelo de 15 polegadas da série Omen uma atualização no desempenho. Uma CPU Kaby Lake e uma placa de vídeo Nvidia de geração Pascal trouxeram vento fresco nas suas velas - mas valeu a pena esperar?

HP Omen 15-ax213ng (Omen Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) - 4096 MB, Análises do: 1493 MHz, Memoría: 7000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 382.05, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, 2 de 2 slots em uso, Dual Channel, máx. 16 GB
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, Full HD, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, M.2 SSD Type 2280 + HGST HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm, 2,5 polegadas
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24.5 x 382 x 253
Bateria
63.3 Wh Lítio-Ion, 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0 (Bang & Olufsen Audio), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de energia: 150 Watt, Acessórios: Guia de início rápido, outro material informativo, Programs: Microsoft Office 365 Trial, diversas ferramentas do fabricante, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.253 kg, Suprimento de energia: 449 g
Preço
1510 EUR

 

HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
686 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
541 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
533 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
307 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
246 MBit/s ∼36% -64%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
653 MBit/s ∼100% +23%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
533 MBit/s ∼82%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
513 MBit/s ∼79% -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
306 MBit/s ∼47% -43%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
282 MBit/s ∼43% -47%
240
cd/m²
237
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
217
cd/m²
212
cd/m²
231
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 240 cd/m² Médio: 227.7 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 230 cd/m²
Contraste: 1095:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.01 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.18 | - Ø
58% sRGB (Argyll) 37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.52
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
AU Optronics AUO41ED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
LGD0519, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
AU Optronics AUO38ED B156HTN 28H80, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
LP156WF6-SPK3, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX502VM-AS73
1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-21%
33%
-8%
-35%
26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (20.4, 21.6)
55 (22, 33)
-31%
22 (10, 12)
48%
36 (17, 19)
14%
58.8 (33.6, 25.2)
-40%
28.4 (11.2, 17.2)
32%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (16.4, 11.6)
31 (8, 23)
-11%
23 (13, 10)
18%
36 (19, 17)
-29%
36 (23.6, 12.4)
-29%
22.4 (6, 16.4)
20%
PWM Frequency
21550 (99)
Screen
-27%
-17%
-96%
-31%
-36%
Brightness
228
203
-11%
257
13%
235
3%
244
7%
205
-10%
Brightness Distribution
88
79
-10%
85
-3%
75
-15%
88
0%
92
5%
Black Level *
0.21
0.28
-33%
0.32
-52%
0.55
-162%
0.35
-67%
0.69
-229%
Contrast
1095
764
-30%
878
-20%
447
-59%
683
-38%
304
-72%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.01
6.04
-51%
5.16
-29%
10.97
-174%
7.3
-82%
4.7
-17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.18
5.91
-86%
4.57
-44%
14.25
-348%
4.9
-54%
1.8
43%
Gamma
2.52 95%
2.44 98%
2.59 93%
1.83 131%
2.19 110%
2.23 108%
CCT
6814 95%
7362 88%
6931 94%
11200 58%
7332 89%
6975 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
38
3%
37
0%
35
-5%
35
-5%
36.2
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
60
3%
58
0%
55
-5%
55
-5%
56.6
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-24% / -26%
8% / -7%
-52% / -78%
-33% / -31%
-5% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 21.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8586 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z (Render test)
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC latencies
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility (benchmark)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼99%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼98% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼98% -1%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼93% -6%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
147 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
140 Points ∼86% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼99%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
725 Points ∼98% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
724 Points ∼98% -2%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
719 Points ∼97% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼91% -8%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
652 Points ∼88% -11%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼100%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.77 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.72 Points ∼95% -5%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.67 Points ∼92% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points ∼100%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.99 Points ∼98% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.45 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.12 Points ∼87% -13%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
266.93 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
266.34 Points ∼100% 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
261.28 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
257.14 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
218.49 Points ∼82% -18%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
39851 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
38128 Points ∼96% +5%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
36293 Points ∼91%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
33799 Points ∼85% -7%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1069.1 ms * ∼100% -13%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
993.7 ms * ∼93% -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
965.2 ms * ∼90% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
946.5 ms * ∼89% -0%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
945.3 ms * ∼88%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6842 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
28665 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7432 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.82 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.16 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
66.88 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
161 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
90.06 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
736 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5268 Points ∼100% +68%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
5068 Points ∼96% +61%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
5003 Points ∼95% +59%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4442 Points ∼84% +41%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3141 Points ∼60%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
2722 Points ∼52% -13%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
7220 Points ∼100% +34%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5402 Points ∼75%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5318 Points ∼74% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
4992 Points ∼69% -8%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4765 Points ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4165 Points ∼87%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4141 Points ∼87% -1%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
3946 Points ∼83% -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
3850 Points ∼81% -8%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3565 Points ∼75% -14%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4165 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5402 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3141 pontos
Ajuda
AS SSD
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (SSD)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (SSD)
ATTO
ATTO
CrystalDiskInfo (SSD)
CrystalDiskInfo (SSD)
HD Tune
HD Tune
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (HDD)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (HDD)
CrystalDiskInfo (HDD)
CrystalDiskInfo (HDD)
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus FX502VM-AS73
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-65%
-97%
-60%
-6%
-67%
10%
Write 4k QD32
557.2
168
-70%
0.893
-100%
255.1
-54%
392.9
-29%
99.74
-82%
526.9
-5%
Read 4k QD32
650.4
276.8
-57%
0.718
-100%
279.6
-57%
457.7
-30%
369.9
-43%
631.7
-3%
Write 4k
176.9
81.38
-54%
0.846
-100%
85.44
-52%
146.4
-17%
70.91
-60%
158.2
-11%
Read 4k
62.63
33.14
-47%
0.327
-99%
27.11
-57%
58.93
-6%
29.36
-53%
54.2
-13%
Write 512
807.1
169.6
-79%
28.31
-96%
304
-62%
822
2%
137.8
-83%
1531
90%
Read 512
805.9
327.6
-59%
28.33
-96%
338.9
-58%
785.8
-2%
343.5
-57%
499.7
-38%
Write Seq
1208
169.2
-86%
100.6
-92%
422.8
-65%
1202
0%
138.2
-89%
1621
34%
Read Seq
1657
475.7
-71%
101.5
-94%
485.8
-71%
2170
31%
502.5
-70%
2141
29%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1657 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1208 MB/s
512K Read: 805.9 MB/s
512K Write: 807.1 MB/s
4K Read: 62.63 MB/s
4K Write: 176.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 650.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 557.2 MB/s
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver (Stress test)
3DMark Sky Diver (Stress test)
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy (Stress test)
3DMark Time Spy (Stress test)
3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11633 Points ∼100% +49%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7821 Points ∼67%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7791 Points ∼67% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7682 Points ∼66% -2%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7646 Points ∼66% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
5904 Points ∼51% -25%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
80496 Points ∼100% +70%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
50981 Points ∼63% +8%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
49539 Points ∼62% +5%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
47250 Points ∼59%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
46362 Points ∼58% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
36659 Points ∼46% -22%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14732 Points ∼100% +49%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9909 Points ∼67%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9768 Points ∼66% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9725 Points ∼66% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
7919 Points ∼54% -20%
3DMark 11 Performance
9045 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
85236 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22010 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6720 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
3550 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
2455 pontos
Ajuda
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 216176.8163.470.7fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 180.2176.414671.3fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 128.186.248.326.6fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 115.468.238.932.5fps

Barulho

Ocioso
32 / 34 / 36 dB
HDD
34 dB
Carga
48 / 51 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Noise
3%
11%
6%
13%
6%
7%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30.4
-1%
30.3
-1%
27.7
8%
28.7
4%
28.8
4%
Idle Minimum *
32
32
-0%
31.4
2%
30.9
3%
30.5
5%
30.6
4%
33.1
-3%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
31.4
8%
30.9
9%
30.5
10%
30.6
10%
33.1
3%
Idle Maximum *
36
36
-0%
31.4
13%
31
14%
30.6
15%
31
14%
34
6%
Load Average *
48
43
10%
36.8
23%
46.5
3%
40
17%
46.2
4%
37.2
22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
40
18%
46.1
6%
Load Maximum *
51
49
4%
41.3
19%
46.8
8%
42.6
16%
52.3
-3%
47.1
8%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test: Prime95 only
Stress test: Prime95 only
Stress test: FurMark only
Stress test: FurMark only
Stress test: FurMark+Prime95
Stress test: FurMark+Prime95
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Heat
3%
9%
21%
4%
-3%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
52.4
48.5
7%
47
10%
43.4
17%
46.8
11%
53.2
-2%
Maximum Bottom *
54.2
59
-9%
47
13%
37.7
30%
55.8
-3%
56.8
-5%
Idle Upper Side *
30.5
28.7
6%
28.4
7%
24.3
20%
27.6
10%
28.8
6%
28.4
7%
Idle Bottom *
28.2
25.7
9%
27.1
4%
23.6
16%
28.4
-1%
31.4
-11%
29.6
-5%

* ... smaller is better

 38.3 °C52.4 °C47.9 °C 
 31.4 °C48.6 °C48.5 °C 
 27.3 °C42.8 °C45.4 °C 
Máximo: 52.4 °C
Médio: 42.5 °C
51 °C54.2 °C35.7 °C
41.8 °C38 °C28.7 °C
44.8 °C37.5 °C27 °C
Máximo: 54.2 °C
Médio: 39.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  48.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.742.52534.236.93130314043.844.55033.834.76326.828.38024.927.710025.930.712524.636.116023.343.32002448.225022.853.831521.859.740020.161.650019.563.563018.967.180018.269.4100018.369.7125017.971.1160017.569.2200017.467.3250017.568.5315017.766.7400017.767.7500017.568.6630017.664.2800017.660.8100001854.91250018.752.81600017.548.7SPL30.379.6N1.445.9median 18.2HP Omen 15-ax213ngmedian 63.5Delta2.48.737.839.434.837.433.634.533.832.43331.634.436.232.732.130.53130.43228.530.22834.427.345.826.255.125.858.124.959.324.963.227.262.325.263.424.969.623.770.423.866.123.774.123.374.623.17523.170.92372.42369.623.163.722.963.723.256.136.3832.751.8median 24.9MSI GS63VR 7RF-228USmedian 63.41.910.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Omen 15-ax213ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.98 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 6 / 11 / 18 Watt
Carga midlight 81 / 146 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Power Consumption
-1%
6%
26%
5%
-40%
-51%
Idle Minimum *
6
7
-17%
7
-17%
4.4
27%
8.5
-42%
14.9
-148%
14.5
-142%
Idle Average *
11
11
-0%
10.2
7%
6.8
38%
9.1
17%
15.1
-37%
17.3
-57%
Idle Maximum *
18
19
-6%
14
22%
8.3
54%
9.7
46%
15.2
16%
17.4
3%
Load Average *
81
79
2%
78
4%
81
-0%
79.9
1%
105.8
-31%
93
-15%
Load Maximum *
146
119
18%
127
13%
127
13%
121.5
17%
148.8
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
90
97.7
-9%
128.8
-43%

* ... smaller is better

maximum battery runtime
maximum battery runtime
minimum battery runtime
minimum battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
H.264 battery runtime
H.264 battery runtime
charging time
charging time
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 45min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3 (Edge 40.15063.0.0)
7h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 16min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 37min
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 63.3 Wh
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M, 61.5 Wh
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 52.5 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 74 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 45 Wh
Asus FX502VM-AS73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Battery Runtime
-14%
-34%
54%
-43%
-41%
-40%
Reader / Idle
765
467
-39%
322
-58%
1174
53%
509
-33%
363
-53%
386
-50%
H.264
196
244
24%
455
132%
WiFi v1.3
428
272
-36%
302
-29%
622
45%
240
-44%
277
-35%
232
-46%
Load
97
93
-4%
81
-16%
81
-16%
46
-53%
64
-34%
75
-23%

Pro

+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ SSD veloz
+ Muito armazenamento (SSD + HD)
+ 16 GB de RAM
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Bom desempenho 3D (para FHD)
+ Posicionamento inteligente das portas
+ Compacto
+ Retro iluminação do teclado
+ Comutador gráfico
+ Leve
+ Design elegante

Contra

- Muito audível sob carga
- Escassa seleção de porta (sem USB 3.1 Gen2, sem DisplayPort, ...)
- Tela FHD média (brilho, espaço de cores, ...)
- A carcaça range em alguns lugares
- A manutenção poderia ser mais fácil
- Som pobre
HP Omen 15 2017, test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
HP Omen 15 2017, test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

O HP Omen 15t (2017) terá dificuldades, especialmente porque a concorrência esteve oferecendo diversos aparelhos com a nova arquitetura Pascal já há algum tempo. O aparelho de 15 polegadas tem um design agradável, embora o acabamento possa ser melhor para um aparelho de $1500. Também não podemos entender por que faltam portas modernas, como DisplayPort ou USB 3.1 Gen2. Sua conectividade não é adequada para o futuro.

O HP Omen 15t (2017) mostrou um desempenho sólido, que desempenhou um papel importante na nossa classificação. O dispositivo está equipado com uma Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti e um potente Intel Core i7-7700HQ. Esta combinação, suportada por 16 GB de RAM, permite que você jogue jogos atuais com altos detalhes, sem problemas.

Se você estava esperando o HP Omen 15t (2017), você será recompensado com desempenho de jogo confiável. No entanto, o fabricante decidiu não atualizar suas portas e manter o que sabe.

A HP também perdeu vários pontos na avaliação devido à sua tela, que não é suficientemente brilhante. A cobertura do espaço de cores é igual de decepcionante. No entanto, gostamos do desempenho do sistema HP Omen 15, que é aprimorado pelo seu SSD NVD.

HP Omen 15-ax213ng - 07/03/2017 v6
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento
75 / 98 → 77%
Teclado
77%
Mouse
72%
Conectividade
53 / 81 → 66%
Peso
61 / 67 → 88%
Bateria
79%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
90 / 85 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
90 / 92 → 98%
Temperatura
83%
Ruído
68 / 95 → 71%
Audio
65%
Médio
75%
82%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 15t 2017 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti, Full HD)
Sebastian Bade, 2017-07- 8 (Update: 2017-07-10)