Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 17 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti, FHD)

Christian Hintze (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/08/2017

Oportunidades perdidas. A atualização do Omen 17 deste ano nos traz uma GPU Pascal, 16 GB de RAM e uma poderosa CPU Kaby Lake. Nossa análise vai revelar se podemos ou não recomendar o Omen 17 apesar de algumas desvantagens.

HP Omen 17-w206ng (Omen Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) - 4096 MB, Análises do: 1493 MHz, Memoría: 7000 MHz, GDDR5, Game Ready Treiber 382.05, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, both slots used, max. 32 GB
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei CMN1738, IPS, Full-HD, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, M.2 SSD Typ 2280 + HGST HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @7200 rpm, 2.5-inch
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado de 3,5 mm (fones e microfone), Card Reader: SD
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Unidade ótica
HP DVDRW GUD1N
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30 x 416 x 279
Bateria
62 Wh Lítio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Bang & Olufsen, HP Audio Boost, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador de 150 W, HP Audio Switch, HP CoolSense, HP JumpStart, HP Lounge, McAfee LiveSafe, Netflix, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.925 kg, Suprimento de energia: 339 g
Preço
1300 Euro

 

Size Comparison

left side
left side
right side
right side
fan vents at the rear
fan vents at the rear
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Nexoc G739
78 MB/s ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
76 MB/s ∼97% 0%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
76 MB/s ∼97%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
66.1 MB/s ∼85% -13%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
26 MB/s ∼33% -66%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
23.7 MB/s ∼30% -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus GL753VE-DS74
92.3 MB/s ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
87 MB/s ∼94% 0%
Nexoc G739
87 MB/s ∼94% 0%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
87 MB/s ∼94%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
28 MB/s ∼30% -68%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
25 MB/s ∼27% -71%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
687 MBit/s ∼100%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
676 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
618 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Qualcomm/Atheros QCA6174
594 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
443 MBit/s ∼64% -36%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
345 MBit/s ∼50% -50%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Qualcomm/Atheros QCA6174
638 MBit/s ∼100% +18%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
542 MBit/s ∼85%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼83% -2%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
497 MBit/s ∼78% -8%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
388 MBit/s ∼61% -28%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
294 MBit/s ∼46% -46%
276
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 335 cd/m² Médio: 295.2 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 318 cd/m²
Contraste: 1272:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5 | - Ø
93% sRGB (Argyll) 61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.28
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Chi Mei CMN1738, 1920x1080, 17.3
Nexoc G739
CMN1738, 1920x1080, 17.3
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
AU Optronics, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus GL753VE-DS74
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GE72 7RE-046
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
33%
6%
-2%
10%
47%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38 (20, 18)
45 (20, 25)
-18%
37 (13, 24)
3%
38 (20, 18)
-0%
36 (18.4, 17.6)
5%
27 (13, 14)
29%
Response Time Black / White *
26 (15.6, 10.4)
28 (7, 21)
-8%
24 (4, 20)
8%
27 (16, 11)
-4%
22 (12.4, 9.6)
15%
9 (6, 3)
65%
PWM Frequency
200 (95)
450 (90)
125%
Screen
7%
1%
-3%
1%
-6%
Brightness
295
304
3%
342
16%
270
-8%
348
18%
230
-22%
Brightness Distribution
79
85
8%
87
10%
79
0%
90
14%
86
9%
Black Level *
0.25
0.23
8%
0.31
-24%
0.38
-52%
0.35
-40%
0.24
4%
Contrast
1272
1357
7%
1168
-8%
792
-38%
1046
-18%
1054
-17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.7
4.19
11%
4.5
4%
3.49
26%
4.4
6%
5.01
-7%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
3.72
26%
3.48
30%
1.88
62%
3
40%
7.26
-45%
Gamma
2.28 105%
2.29 105%
2.23 108%
2.35 102%
2.1 114%
2.09 115%
CCT
7374 88%
7104 91%
6144 106%
6587 99%
6362 102%
6329 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
59
-3%
55
-10%
56
-8%
56
-8%
76
25%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
91
-2%
84
-10%
86
-8%
86
-8%
100
8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
20% / 14%
4% / 2%
-3% / -3%
6% / 2%
21% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 10.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz95 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 95 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5069 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼99%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼92% -7%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
145 Points ∼90% -9%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
141 Points ∼88% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
743 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points ∼99% +1%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
729 Points ∼98%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points ∼91% -7%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
515 Points ∼69% -29%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼99%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.69 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.61 Points ∼88% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.1 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.09 Points ∼99%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.06 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼92% -8%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7611 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7206 Points ∼95% -5%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
28735 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
26510 Points ∼92% -8%
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6838 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
28735 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7611 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.09 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
67.98 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.81 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
159 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
103.46 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
729 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points ∼100% +15%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4270 Points ∼88% +1%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4216 Points ∼87%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
3596 Points ∼74% -15%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
3570 Points ∼74% -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4216 pontos
Ajuda
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Nexoc G739
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
3%
-33%
-49%
-95%
-51%
Write 4k QD32
504.7
544.4
8%
295.3
-41%
212.9
-58%
4.705
-99%
264
-48%
Read 4k QD32
587.9
635.7
8%
600.2
2%
372.5
-37%
1.008
-100%
57.8
-90%
Write 4k
155.6
154.5
-1%
153.3
-1%
112.9
-27%
3.152
-98%
108
-31%
Read 4k
59.93
60.74
1%
42.7
-29%
22.7
-62%
0.435
-99%
14.1
-76%
Write 512
805
826.7
3%
294.7
-63%
481.4
-40%
98.56
-88%
458
-43%
Read 512
846.3
856.5
1%
616.2
-27%
455.1
-46%
39.93
-95%
583
-31%
Write Seq
1176
1192
1%
294.9
-75%
495.7
-58%
109.1
-91%
584
-50%
Read Seq
1606
1666
4%
1156
-28%
539.6
-66%
117.6
-93%
1049
-35%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1606 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1176 MB/s
512K Read: 846.3 MB/s
512K Write: 805 MB/s
4K Read: 59.93 MB/s
4K Write: 155.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 587.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 504.7 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
20656 Points ∼100% +118%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
10270 Points ∼50% +8%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
10186 Points ∼49% +7%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
10008 Points ∼48% +6%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9482 Points ∼46%
3DMark 11 Performance
9245 pontos
Ajuda
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 141.27886.01347.96226fps

Barulho

Ocioso
34 / 35 / 36 dB
DVD
38 / dB
Carga
47 / 52 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
HP Omen 17-w206ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7300HQ
Noise
2%
5%
3%
4%
15%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
29.1
3%
30
-0%
30
-0%
29.7
1%
Idle Minimum *
34
33
3%
33.3
2%
34
-0%
31
9%
30.2
11%
Idle Average *
35
34
3%
33.3
5%
35
-0%
32
9%
30.2
14%
Idle Maximum *
36
35
3%
33.4
7%
36
-0%
38
-6%
30.6
15%
Load Average *
47
45
4%
42.6
9%
41
13%
44
6%
33.8
28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
46.8
2%
39.5
18%
Load Maximum *
52
52
-0%
46.8
10%
49
6%
50
4%
42.6
18%

* ... smaller is better

 41.9 °C53 °C55.6 °C 
 44.5 °C53.5 °C51.1 °C 
 40.7 °C48.6 °C43.1 °C 
Máximo: 55.6 °C
Médio: 48 °C
57.7 °C39 °C33.4 °C
44.4 °C44.1 °C31.2 °C
36.2 °C43.6 °C34.8 °C
Máximo: 57.7 °C
Médio: 40.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  53.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
HP Omen 17-w206ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7300HQ
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Heat
31%
8%
8%
10%
7%
Maximum Upper Side *
55.6
35.8
36%
45.8
18%
50.6
9%
48
14%
45
19%
Maximum Bottom *
57.7
36.4
37%
45.2
22%
50.8
12%
40.8
29%
54.3
6%
Idle Upper Side *
32.2
22.2
31%
31.7
2%
28.7
11%
29.9
7%
29.6
8%
Idle Bottom *
27.2
22.2
18%
29.9
-10%
27.1
-0%
29.8
-10%
28.6
-5%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.447253638.13130.731.14031.335.45029.432.5632728.8803233.810036.937.212526.74016024.645.320024.35325023.459.531522.362.840020.665.850019.868.86301969.980017.868.4100017.97112501869.4160017.768.9200017.566.5250017.569.3315017.469.1400017.766.8500017.664.2630017.660.1800017.556.71000017.655.51250017.553.91600017.441.2SPL30.579.6N1.546.2median 17.8HP Omen 17-w206ngmedian 64.2Delta2.48.342.636.242.640.432.240.443.931.743.945.22945.246.428.846.45030.85051.428.351.453.428.953.454.824.554.857.62457.658.724.658.761.222.161.265.32265.363.720.863.765.820.365.870.819.370.870.118.670.168.517.968.570.317.770.371.81771.86417.16466.116.966.163.31763.360.616.960.657.616.957.663.11763.168.617.268.66717.16754.717.254.751.317.451.379.53079.5481.448median 63.7Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XNmedian 17.7median 63.75.425.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Omen 17-w206ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 11 / 18 / 24 Watt
Carga midlight 84 / 146 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 17-w206ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7300HQ
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Power Consumption
10%
-36%
19%
25%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
11
7
36%
19
-73%
8.7
21%
7.5
32%
14
-27%
Idle Average *
18
14
22%
25
-39%
12.4
31%
11.3
37%
20
-11%
Idle Maximum *
24
23
4%
31
-29%
15.4
36%
11.8
51%
25
-4%
Load Average *
84
82
2%
90
-7%
73
13%
82.1
2%
82
2%
Load Maximum *
146
163
-12%
193
-32%
130
11%
116.6
20%
135
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
101
98
3%
96.3
5%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
13h 15min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3 (Edge 40.3)
6h 20min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 36min
HP Omen 17-w206ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, 62 Wh
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, 62 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, 95 Wh
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7300HQ, 52.5 Wh
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, 48 Wh
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, 51.4 Wh
Battery Runtime
-5%
-20%
-27%
-41%
-52%
Reader / Idle
795
613
-23%
432
-46%
520
-35%
WiFi v1.3
380
288
-24%
247
-35%
278
-27%
235
-38%
184
-52%
Load
96
128
33%
115
20%
47
-51%
H.264
322
233
195

Pro

+ Bom SSD + HD de 1 TB
+ Bateria substituível pelo usuário
+ Belo design
+ CPU e GPU velozes
+ 16 GB de RAM
+ Longa duração da bateria com carga baixa e média
+ Bom preço

Contra

- Ruído
- Temperatura
- Bleeding da tela muito notório
- PWM flickering
- Latências dpc
- Touchpad ruim
- Manutenção complicada
Omen 17-w206ng, review unit courtesy of Cyberport.
Omen 17-w206ng, review unit courtesy of Cyberport.

O Omen 17-w206ng nos deixou um pouco chateados e desapontados. Nosso instinto nos diz que este poderia ter sido um portátil muito poderoso, se apenas a HP não tivesse estragado as coisas.

Seu design, em geral, é agradável e seus componentes são bem equilibrados e poderosos. No papel, nos maravilhamos com uma CPU muito rápida, 16 GB de RAM, uma GPU Pascal, um veloz SSD e um disco rígido de 1 TB para o armazenamento. No papel, é isso, porque na realidade o Omen não mostra suas cores verdadeiras.

Bleeding significativo da tela e cintilação de PWM; latências dpc; e por último, mas não menos importante, as altas emissões de ruído e calor.

Essas graves desvantagens praticamente desqualificam o Omen 17 e, portanto, não podemos recomendar o dispositivo. Os erros poderiam ter sido evitados e o controle de qualidade da HP falhou miseravelmente.

O que resta é um portátil que, pelo menos no papel, está adequadamente equipado e poderia ter sido um excelente dispositivo multimídia completo. No entanto, é incapaz de impulsionar e aproveitar todo o seu potencial.

Assim, não podemos recomendar o portátil a ninguém.

HP Omen 17-w206ng - 07/02/2017 v6
Christian Hintze

Acabamento
75 / 98 → 77%
Teclado
77%
Mouse
69%
Conectividade
52 / 81 → 64%
Peso
57 / 67 → 79%
Bateria
88%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
90 / 85 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
95 / 92 → 100%
Temperatura
79%
Ruído
64 / 95 → 67%
Audio
65%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Médio
73%
81%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 17 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti, FHD)
Christian Hintze, 2017-07- 8 (Update: 2017-07-10)