Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 14 (i7-8550U, MX150)

Daniel Puschina, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/20/2018

Top case, but what does it look like inside? A HP sabe como agradar seus clientes, criando dispositivos com designs atraentes e acabamento sólido. O novo Pavilion 14 é outro portátil HP premium a um preço acessível. Também estamos interessados em como o nosso dispositivo de teste funciona sob o seu capô anodizado com jato de areia. O mais recente portátil Pavilion da HP consegue se enfrentar contra a concorrência, ou só é mais um?

HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng (Pavilion 14 Serie)
Placa gráfica
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4
Pantalha
14 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, BOE072C, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Sunrise Point-LP
Disco rígido
SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G, 128 GB 
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 17.9 x 326.8 x 225.5
Bateria
41 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: Câmera HP Wide Vision HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Dois alto-falantes, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 65 W, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.69 kg
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
163.8 MB/s ∼100% +314%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
75.2 MB/s ∼46% +90%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 190, n=150)
57.5 MB/s ∼35% +45%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
39.6 MB/s ∼24%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
39 MB/s ∼24% -2%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
 
35.61 MB/s ∼22% -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.8 MB/s ∼16% -32%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212.4 MB/s ∼100% +479%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.4 MB/s ∼41% +138%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=147)
75.2 MB/s ∼35% +105%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
 
36.8 MB/s ∼17% 0%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.7 MB/s ∼17%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36 MB/s ∼17% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.2 MB/s ∼13% -26%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
656 MBit/s ∼100% +133%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
648 MBit/s ∼99% +131%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
623 MBit/s ∼95% +122%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼80% +87%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 949, n=109)
495 MBit/s ∼75% +76%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
302 MBit/s ∼46% +7%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
281 MBit/s ∼43%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
280 MBit/s ∼43% 0%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
630 MBit/s ∼100% +120%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
515 MBit/s ∼82% +79%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
479 MBit/s ∼76% +67%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
478 MBit/s ∼76% +67%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 949, n=108)
466 MBit/s ∼74% +62%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
289 MBit/s ∼46% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
287 MBit/s ∼46%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
269 MBit/s ∼43% -6%
224
cd/m²
210
cd/m²
218
cd/m²
217
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
216
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 239 cd/m² Médio: 223.4 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 205 cd/m²
Contraste: 885:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 3.64
ΔE Greyscale 5.85 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
59% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
BOE072C, , 1920x1080, 14
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
AU Optronics AUO23ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
JDI LPM139M422A, , 3000x2000, 13.9
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
AUO B140QAN02.3, , 2560x1440, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
LP140QH2-SPB1, , 2560x1440, 14
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
NV140FHM-N62, BOE0718, , 1920x1080, 14
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
BOE0730, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
8%
7%
-24%
10%
-12%
129%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (21, 19)
40 (18, 22)
-0%
42 (20, 22)
-5%
58.4 (29.2, 29.2)
-46%
36 (17.6, 18.4)
10%
43.6 (24.4, 19.2)
-9%
38 (20.4, 17.6)
5%
Response Time Black / White *
31 (18, 13)
26 (16, 10)
16%
25 (12, 13)
19%
31.2 (14.8, 16.4)
-1%
28 (15.6, 12.4)
10%
39.2 (22.8, 16.4)
-26%
27.6 (15.6, 12)
11%
PWM Frequency
200 (90)
200 (99)
0%
943.4 (99)
372%
Screen
-3%
64%
24%
31%
21%
14%
Brightness middle
239
186
-22%
550
130%
311
30%
311
30%
310.4
30%
329.3
38%
Brightness
223
180
-19%
512
130%
293
31%
302
35%
303
36%
316
42%
Brightness Distribution
88
88
0%
88
0%
85
-3%
91
3%
89
1%
84
-5%
Black Level *
0.27
0.15
44%
0.32
-19%
0.2
26%
0.36
-33%
0.31
-15%
0.31
-15%
Contrast
885
1240
40%
1719
94%
1555
76%
864
-2%
1001
13%
1062
20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.3
5.94
-12%
2.28
57%
6
-13%
3
43%
4.07
23%
4.78
10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.03
10.81
-8%
4.36
57%
11.6
-16%
6.1
39%
8.33
17%
11.75
-17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.64
6.07
-67%
0.8
78%
1.6
56%
1.7
53%
4.07
-12%
3.51
4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.85
4.44
24%
3.27
44%
8.7
-49%
4
32%
2.8
52%
7.9
-35%
Gamma
2.45 90%
2.81 78%
2.35 94%
2.19 100%
2.17 101%
2.217 99%
2.24 98%
CCT
7169 91%
6272 104%
6819 95%
8426 77%
6961 93%
7033 92%
8323 78%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
35
-8%
62
63%
60.9
60%
66.7
76%
55.3
46%
58.8
55%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59
55
-7%
98
66%
96
63%
96.7
64%
84.6
43%
90.4
53%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / -1%
36% / 55%
0% / 16%
21% / 28%
5% / 14%
72% / 38%

* ... smaller is better

Our test device is 59% sRGB accurate…
Our test device is 59% sRGB accurate…
…and 38% AdobeRGB accurate
…and 38% AdobeRGB accurate

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
HWInfo
HWInfo
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Core i7-8550U
170 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
166 Points ∼98%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
165 Points ∼97% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
Intel Core i7-8550U
161 Points ∼95% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (108 - 172, n=62)
160 Points ∼94% -4%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
149 Points ∼88% -10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Intel Core i7-8550U
141 Points ∼83% -15%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
124 Points ∼73% -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 191, n=334)
124 Points ∼73% -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Core i7-8550U
723 Points ∼100% +37%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
606 (min: 417.88, max: 605.96) Points ∼84% +15%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
589 Points ∼81% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (301 - 761, n=64)
571 Points ∼79% +8%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
527.4 (min: 505.84, max: 527.4) Points ∼73%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
523 Points ∼72% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
Intel Core i7-8550U
518 Points ∼72% -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Intel Core i7-8550U
514 Points ∼71% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=345)
456 Points ∼63% -14%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
166 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
97.44 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
527.4 Points
Ajuda
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730Tooltip
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø512 (505.84-527.4)
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø485 (464.55-537.4)
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø481 (476.32-517.64)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø633 (602.16-721.94)
Asus Zenbook UX430UN Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø556 (529.72-624.09)
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø519 (509.07-542.3)
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4909 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (4063 - 5228, n=17)
4771 Points ∼97% +7%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
4732 Points ∼96% +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
4648 Points ∼95% +4%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
Vega 8, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
4467 Points ∼91% 0%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
4456 Points ∼91%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4417 Points ∼90% -1%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
4323 Points ∼88% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=251)
4234 Points ∼86% -5%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
3792 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (3145 - 4130, n=18)
3674 Points ∼97% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3540 Points ∼93% +5%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
3482 Points ∼92% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
3463 Points ∼91% +2%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
Vega 8, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
3404 Points ∼90% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
3379 Points ∼89%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1740 - 4693, n=271)
3350 Points ∼88% -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3183 Points ∼84% -6%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3379 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4456 pontos
Ajuda
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
103%
138%
446%
Write 4k QD32
116.4
273.6
135%
260.2
124%
706.2
507%
Read 4k QD32
262.1
360
37%
330.3
26%
446.6
70%
Write 4k
68.66
117.5
71%
99.97
46%
146.8
114%
Read 4k
33.15
33.79
2%
39.83
20%
62.65
89%
Write 512
158.2
461.4
192%
642.2
306%
1863
1078%
Read 512
309.6
627.9
103%
769.3
148%
1799
481%
Write Seq
202.4
459.9
127%
733.3
262%
1858
818%
Read Seq
508.2
1317
159%
1360
168%
2588
409%
SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
Sequential Read: 508.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 202.4 MB/s
512K Read: 309.6 MB/s
512K Write: 158.2 MB/s
4K Read: 33.15 MB/s
4K Write: 68.66 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 262.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 116.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
4708 Points ∼100% +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (2796 - 4876, n=38)
4172 Points ∼89% +42%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3867 Points ∼82% +31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3833 Points ∼81% +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3551 Points ∼75% +21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3450 Points ∼73% +17%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2945 Points ∼63%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 18234, n=602)
2777 Points ∼59% -6%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
2381 Points ∼51% -19%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3622 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3561 Points ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (2323 - 3739, n=35)
3300 Points ∼91% -7%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3122 Points ∼86% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2807 Points ∼77% -21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2793 Points ∼77% -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 14463, n=378)
2679 Points ∼74% -25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2323 Points ∼64% -35%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
1715 Points ∼47% -52%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
19900 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
19698 Points ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (16227 - 22183, n=34)
19462 Points ∼98% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
18946 Points ∼95% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
17743 Points ∼89% -10%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
17469 Points ∼88% -11%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
17345 Points ∼87% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=380)
15883 Points ∼80% -19%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
11226 Points ∼56% -43%
3DMark 11 Performance
3130 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
12943 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3215 pontos
Ajuda
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 77, n=14)
28.9 fps ∼100% +189%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
15 (min: 11, max: 20) fps ∼52% +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (10 - 18, n=6)
14.8 fps ∼51% +48%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
10 fps ∼35%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 81, n=17)
25.6 fps ∼100% +113%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
17 (min: 12, max: 23) fps ∼66% +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (12 - 21, n=7)
17 fps ∼66% +42%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
12 fps ∼47%
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia
  (14 - 103, n=18)
46.9 fps ∼100% +51%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (31 - 46, n=7)
39 fps ∼83% +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
34 (min: 26, max: 38) fps ∼72% +10%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
31 fps ∼66%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Average of class Multimedia
  (6 - 62, n=7)
24 fps ∼100% +118%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (9 - 15, n=5)
12 fps ∼50% +9%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
11 fps ∼46%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (6 - 65, n=9)
24.4 fps ∼100% +88%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (11 - 18, n=5)
15.4 fps ∼63% +18%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
13 fps ∼53%
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (13 - 97, n=11)
47.9 fps ∼100% +45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (30 - 50, n=5)
40.8 fps ∼85% +24%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
33 fps ∼69%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.7 - 37.2, n=14)
13.1 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (7 - 10, n=4)
8.38 fps ∼64%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
7 fps ∼53%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.6 - 37.4, n=14)
19.2 fps ∼100% +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (12 - 17.3, n=5)
14.2 fps ∼74% +18%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
12.6 fps ∼66% +5%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
12 fps ∼63%
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (23 - 35, n=6)
28.9 fps ∼100% +26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9 - 63.6, n=18)
28.1 fps ∼97% +22%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
25.4 fps ∼88% +10%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
23 fps ∼80%
baixo média alto ultra
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 2312fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 3112109fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 331311fps

Barulho

Ocioso
32.7 / 32.7 / 32.7 dB
HDD
33.4 dB
Carga
42.9 / 45 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.633.635.135.733.62533.431.536.335.833.43141.539.135.537.541.54032.834.131.131.532.85035.135.330.736.635.16328.829.829.327.628.88032.632.431.127.232.610034.333.533.925.134.312526.626.625.225.826.616025.924.823.724.325.920023.523.923.523.123.525023.223.222.222.723.231523.223.122.121.723.240024.424.721.220.724.450024.825.320.42024.863026.426.62119.826.480028.528.720.218.628.5100030.630.822.818.230.6125030.530.322.717.930.5160032.332.421.517.832.3200032.832.921.517.532.8250035.135.319.917.635.1315034.134.120.217.934.1400028.928.919.41828.9500029.329.518.818.129.3630028.428.618.518.128.480002323.118.518.2231000020.620.518.418.120.61250019.11918.31819.11600018.718.418.318.118.7SPL42.94332.730.642.9N3.83.81.61.33.8median 26.6median 26.6median 21median 18.2median 26.6Delta3.63.81.723.645.933.132.930.731.745.943.933.633.129.529.543.941.136.434.832.330.241.132.532.332.129.129.332.531.130.33129.629.831.128.628.927.926.727.728.627.127.927.426.726.127.125.926.725.525.125.925.925.126.624.324.324.625.12425.123.624.123.82423.824.823.2232223.824.625.12321.620.924.627.628.724.621.121.327.625.52723.621.222.125.530.331.425.719.418.930.329.831.225.21918.329.828.729.622.418.518.228.731.132.522.517.91831.1293120.717.417.42927.630.219.617.517.427.626.828.919.917.417.426.826.529.119.617.517.426.525.82819.11817.525.824.226.718.918.117.924.228.330.919.318.41828.323.626.818.918.918.423.622.224.41918.818.722.220.321.81919.118.920.319.720.419.319.21919.719.919.819.519.819.419.939.341.33330.630.439.333.51.71.31.33median 25.8median 27median 20.7median 19median 18.7median 25.82.22.22.51.622.232.228.933.533.126.729.131.931.533.233.931.633.131.631.829.33331.329.630.831.82627.526.227.826.824.625.828.825.125.627.326.823.32423.625.424.423.723.325.222.722.421.82521.722.721.323.620.821.620.325.520.222.919.428.319.722.118.929.118.721.218.429.919.321.217.527.819.220.217.42620.522.217.126.31922.216.828.318.420.916.627.818.121.116.727.818.820.316.928.518.823.217.428.218.219.317.632.21818.517.826.51818.317.823.317.81817.921.817.917.917.819.917.817.917.718.83133.129.7401.51.91.33.5median 19median 21.2median 17.8median 26.51.71.71.62.233.631.628.131.231.132.533.228.529.129.629.329.130.33032.231.231.130.83030.529.529.931.129.527.226.828.82829.727.226.326.326.225.72626.526.125.124.72626.625.926252525.525.724.823.924.6252423.925.225.125.12323.323.824.123.324.522.222.722.62422.823.421.521.322.422.921.720.920.820.720.422.220.620.320.320.218.921.422.420.521.119.718.12222.319.621.619.117.722.321.519.520.21916.721.523.119.92219.716.723.225.220.624.422.116.125.527.723.627.12415.727.229.42327.122.915.929.328.822.126.923.315.928.128.320.525.720.715.928.12920.126.921.116.328.524.718.422.318.616.624.32017.619.217.916.919.918.417.618.317.717.218.31817.818.318.117.2181818.218.518.917.317.91918.520.521.217.418.638.232.836.533.229382.61.82.31.81.22.6median 23.1median 20.5median 22median 20.7median 17.2median 23.22.42.42.61.91.72.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion 14-ce0002ngHuawei MateBook X Pro, i7Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKBLenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Carga Máxima
 34.7 °C48.2 °C49.2 °C 
 27.4 °C42 °C44.5 °C 
 25.2 °C25.6 °C31.3 °C 
Máximo: 49.2 °C
Médio: 36.5 °C
40 °C47 °C32.7 °C
40.2 °C30.5 °C26 °C
29.3 °C27.7 °C26 °C
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 33.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  49 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F, ranging from 21.5 to 82 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.8 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.3 °C / 88.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.2 °C / 84.6 F (-2.1 °C / -3.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.635.734.62534.835.834.83135.837.535.84031.231.531.25036.236.636.2633027.6308031.927.231.910034.325.134.312530.725.830.716028.624.328.620031.123.131.125048.922.748.931556.321.756.340064.720.764.750065.72065.763066.519.866.580061.818.661.8100065.518.265.5125068.217.968.2160069.917.869.9200069.617.569.6250068.917.668.9315067.217.967.2400067.81867.8500064.518.164.5630065.618.165.6800066.118.266.11000065.118.165.11250061.91861.9160005318.153SPL79.230.679.2N42.91.342.9median 65.1median 18.2median 65.1Delta8.528.531.431.731.43529.53531.730.231.729.829.329.830.929.830.92927.72934.926.134.941.925.941.948.324.648.348.723.848.745.82245.858.120.958.164.721.364.769.522.169.570.218.970.265.318.365.363.118.263.167.71867.765.217.465.266.917.466.967.217.467.266.917.466.966.317.566.362.617.962.661.71861.76218.46262.818.762.856.218.956.258.31958.347.519.447.577.530.477.540.81.340.8median 62.8median 18.7median 62.86.326.333.533.431.930.231.636.129.331.930.831.826.229.825.830.127.327.823.630.323.341.921.854.621.36420.365.719.465.318.961.118.459.417.567.417.465.917.161.916.863.216.665.816.76516.967.417.46117.670.317.866.817.869.317.967.517.860.617.754.229.778.11.344.8median 17.8median 641.65.831.129.529.328.631.13131.130.129.727.12624.726.623.725.724.923.928.623.837.922.645.822.451.720.454.818.956.618.16617.772.116.774.416.770.816.161.615.761.915.961.715.959.115.95816.364.216.668.516.968.117.260.917.26017.358.217.454.42978.91.242.9median 17.2median 601.75.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 14-ce0002ngHuawei MateBook X Pro, i7Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKBLenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.19 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.18 / 0.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 6.3 / 8.4 / 10.2 Watt
Carga midlight 59 / 66.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
8550U, GeForce MX150, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, LTPS, 3000x2000, 13.9
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
8550U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 2560x1440, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 2560x1440, 14
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
8550U, GeForce MX150, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
19%
23%
10%
29%
-14%
10%
-59%
Idle Minimum *
6.3
4.7
25%
3.9
38%
3.4
46%
3
52%
5.3
16%
4.58 (2.2 - 11.6, n=37)
27%
11.8 (2.6 - 101, n=903)
-87%
Idle Average *
8.4
8.7
-4%
5.76
31%
7.5
11%
5.8
31%
9.8
-17%
7.94 (5 - 13.8, n=37)
5%
16.3 (4.2 - 122, n=903)
-94%
Idle Maximum *
10.2
9.8
4%
7.14
30%
10.8
-6%
6.2
39%
12.6
-24%
9.7 (6.2 - 14.7, n=37)
5%
19.9 (4.7 - 181, n=903)
-95%
Load Average *
59
39.4
33%
50.8
14%
55.4
6%
54.1
8%
73
-24%
54.3 (33 - 75, n=36)
8%
59.8 (18.5 - 164, n=882)
-1%
Load Maximum *
66.3
40.4
39%
65.8
1%
70.3
-6%
56.4
15%
80
-21%
63.1 (40.4 - 89.2, n=37)
5%
77.8 (20.1 - 329, n=887)
-17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34
45.9
67.6

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
13h 17min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 25min
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
8550U, GeForce MX150, 41 Wh
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
8550U, GeForce MX150, 45 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
8550U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
8550U, GeForce MX150, 84 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
25%
5%
27%
11%
20%
-27%
Reader / Idle
797
1160
46%
881
11%
1366
71%
1039
30%
927
16%
393 (73 - 1810, n=867)
-51%
H.264
350
428
22%
550
57%
346 (114 - 915, n=98)
-1%
WiFi v1.3
414
506.3
22%
520
26%
530
28%
560
35%
625
51%
351 (96 - 942, n=219)
-15%
Load
145
157
8%
85
-41%
76
-48%
98
-32%
135
-7%
84.8 (32 - 238, n=867)
-42%

Pro

+ Carcaça premium com um design moderno
+ Carcaça sólida e bem construída
+ Sensor de digitais incrivelmente veloz

Contra

- Tela fraca em muitas áreas
- A tela é ilegível sob a luz do sol
- Manutenção difícil
- Lento leitor de cartões SD
- Gerenciamento térmico deficiente
The HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng review. Test device courtesy of HP Germany.
The HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng review. Test device courtesy of HP Germany.

O novo HP Pavilion 14 é um dispositivo multimídia acessível, porém elegante, que é impulsionado por um processador Intel Core i7-8550U e uma GPU Nvidia GeForce MX150. Nosso dispositivo de teste tem desempenho de sistema aceitável, exceto pelo seu SSD lento da SanDisk. Positivamente, o dispositivo também não possui afogamento térmico. Apesar disso, o Pavilion 14 não pode competir com outros dispositivos equipados com GeForce MX150 no desempenho gráfico; o IdeaPad 530s alcançou taxas de quadros até 50% melhores em benchmarks de jogos, por exemplo.

Indiscutivelmente, nossa maior crítica ao novo HP Pavilion 14 é a sua tela. Uma combinação de um acabamento mate e uma luminosidade máxima de 239 cd/m² torna o dispositivo inutilizável em exteriores num dia de sol.

Além disso, nosso dispositivo de teste tem um gerenciamento térmico ruim. O Pavilion 14 esquenta muito para um portátil multimídia, especialmente devido ao seu modesto desempenho em jogos e gráficos. Da mesma forma, o ventilador fica incrivelmente alto, mas não consegue resfriar o suficiente o dispositivo. No geral, o sistema de resfriamento é inadequado para um Core i7-8550U e uma GeForce MX150.

O Pavilion 14 é mais adequado para aplicativos do dia a dia e trabalho de escritório. O dispositivo terá desempenho suficiente para a maioria das tarefas e ficará esteticamente melhor do que muitos de seus concorrentes. Dito isso, recomendamos que você dê uma olhada no Pavilion 15 impulsionado por uma AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, que possui uma tela melhor e um resfriamento mais eficiente. Também custa 200 Euros (~$231) a menos, embora você deva renunciar a uma GPU dedicada e ajustar-se ao desempenho mais fraco do sistema.

HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng - 10/07/2018 v6
Daniel Puschina

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 80%
Teclado
72%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
49 / 81 → 60%
Peso
67 / 20-67 → 99%
Bateria
87%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
74 / 85 → 87%
Desempenho da aplicação
87 / 92 → 94%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
79 / 95 → 83%
Audio
60%
Camera
34 / 85 → 40%
Médio
73%
82%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 14 (i7-8550U, MX150)
Daniel Puschina, 2018-10-20 (Update: 2018-10-23)