Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook UX430UN (i7-8550U, GeForce MX150)

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/27/2018

Máquina multimídia portátil. O UX430UN oferece uma tela maior e GPU mais veloz que o XPS 13 por muito menos que o XPS 15. Seu chassi e teclado infelizmente são mais fracos do que o esperado e se sentem mais baratos ao toque.

Asus Zenbook UX430UN (ZenBook UX430 Serie)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 - 2048 MB, Análises do: 1468 MHz, Memoría: 6008 MHz, GDDR5, 382.84, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, 1200 MHz, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
14 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, NV140FHM-N62, BOE0718, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002, 512 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Sensores: Sensor de luz ambiente
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 15.9 x 324 x 225
Bateria
50 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 3 células, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 9 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Guia do usuário, Cartão de garantia, McAfee Anti-Virus, Asus Live Update, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.32 kg, Suprimento de energia: 230 g
Preço
1200 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, USB 2.0
Right: SD reader, USB 2.0
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, Micro HDMI, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1 (w/ DisplayPort support)
Left: AC adapter, Micro HDMI, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1 (w/ DisplayPort support)
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s ∼100% +411%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
76.9 MB/s ∼42% +116%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
 
35.61 MB/s ∼20%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
210.3 MB/s ∼100% +471%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
90.19 MB/s ∼43% +145%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
 
36.8 MB/s ∼17%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
668 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
648 MBit/s ∼97%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
639 MBit/s ∼96% -1%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
505 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
497 MBit/s ∼98% +4%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
478 MBit/s ∼95%
319.3
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
317.4
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
310.4
cd/m²
301.8
cd/m²
285.5
cd/m²
298.4
cd/m²
287.4
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 319.3 cd/m² Médio: 302.6 cd/m² Minimum: 16.91 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 310.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 1001:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.07 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 4.07
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
84.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 55.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.217
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
NV140FHM-N62, BOE0718, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
ID: Sharp SHP148B, Name: LQ133D1, Dell P/N: 8XDHY, IPS, 13.3, 3840x2160
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 15, 1920x1080
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA
AU Optronics AUO383D / B140HAN03.8, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Huawei MateBook X
Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 13.3, 2160x1440
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
ID: MEI96A2, Name: Panasonic VVX14T092N00, IPS, 13.5, 2256x1504
Response Times
363%
469%
37%
32%
-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43.6 (24.4, 19.2)
67.2 (31.6, 35.6)
-54%
46 (25.2, 20.8)
-6%
24 (12, 12)
45%
33 (15, 18)
24%
50.8 (25.6, 25.2)
-17%
Response Time Black / White *
39.2 (22.8, 16.4)
41.6 (22.8, 18.8)
-6%
29.6 (16.4, 13.2)
24%
28 (18, 10)
29%
24 (12, 12)
39%
37.2 (20, 17.2)
5%
PWM Frequency
200 (99)
2500 (20)
1150%
2976 (91)
1388%
Screen
11%
-2%
2%
20%
23%
Brightness middle
310.4
496.4
60%
558.2
80%
337
9%
408
31%
384.2
24%
Brightness
303
469
55%
528
74%
295
-3%
395
30%
378
25%
Brightness Distribution
89
84
-6%
92
3%
81
-9%
88
-1%
90
1%
Black Level *
0.31
0.5
-61%
0.46
-48%
0.21
32%
0.45
-45%
0.36
-16%
Contrast
1001
993
-1%
1213
21%
1605
60%
907
-9%
1067
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.07
2.9
29%
4.41
-8%
4.89
-20%
1.55
62%
1.8
56%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.33
5.26
37%
10.91
-31%
8.43
-1%
2.19
74%
4.2
50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.07
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.8
3.9
-39%
6.6
-136%
4.28
-53%
1.91
32%
1.2
57%
Gamma
2.217 99%
2.066 106%
2.19 100%
2.25 98%
2.34 94%
2.21 100%
CCT
7033 92%
7169 91%
7615 85%
7352 88%
6491 100%
6708 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55.3
63.9
16%
61.3
11%
56
1%
61
10%
63.7
15%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
84.6
98.2
16%
97.2
15%
87
3%
96
13%
94.2
11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
187% / 92%
234% / 107%
20% / 8%
26% / 22%
9% / 18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.8 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.4 ms rise
↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8801 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
Intel Core i5-7600K
168 Points ∼81% +2%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
165 Points ∼80%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (108 - 172, n=58)
160 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
155 Points ∼75% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼69% -13%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
142 Points ∼69% -14%
Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T
Intel Core i7-7500U
141 Points ∼68% -15%
Alienware 13 R3 (i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050 Ti)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
136 Points ∼66% -18%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
135 Points ∼65% -18%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points ∼63% -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points ∼62% -22%
Asus ASUSPRO Essential P2520LA-XO0167H
Intel Core i5-5200U
97 Points ∼47% -41%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel Core i5-8250U
724 Points ∼23% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel Core i5-8250U
716 Points ∼23% +22%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
710 Points ∼23% +21%
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
Intel Core i5-7600K
660 Points ∼21% +12%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
589 Points ∼19%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (301 - 761, n=60)
570 Points ∼18% -3%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
556 Points ∼18% -6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
544 Points ∼17% -8%
Alienware 13 R3 (i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050 Ti)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
512 Points ∼16% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼11% -44%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
327 Points ∼11% -44%
Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T
Intel Core i7-7500U
307 Points ∼10% -48%
Asus ASUSPRO Essential P2520LA-XO0167H
Intel Core i5-5200U
253 Points ∼8% -57%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
Intel Core i5-7600K
1.98 Points ∼85% +16%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.95 Points ∼83% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (1.43 - 1.95, n=30)
1.832 Points ∼78% +8%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.7 Points ∼73%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.61 Points ∼69% -5%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.48 Points ∼63% -13%
Asus ASUSPRO Essential P2520LA-XO0167H
Intel Core i5-5200U
1.2 Points ∼51% -29%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
Intel Core i5-7600K
7.67 Points ∼28% +17%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.13 Points ∼26% +8%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
6.58 Points ∼24%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (4.38 - 8.56, n=30)
6.31 Points ∼23% -4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
6.03 Points ∼22% -8%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.15 Points ∼12% -52%
Asus ASUSPRO Essential P2520LA-XO0167H
Intel Core i5-5200U
2.8 Points ∼10% -57%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
Intel Core i5-7600K
6730 Points ∼62% +4%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
6478 Points ∼60%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
6478 Points ∼60% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (4202 - 8211, n=29)
6325 Points ∼58% -2%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5426 Points ∼50% -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
5013 Points ∼46% -23%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
4904 Points ∼45% -24%
Asus ASUSPRO Essential P2520LA-XO0167H
Intel Core i5-5200U
4073 Points ∼38% -37%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
Intel Core i5-7600K
23585 Points ∼47% +21%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
19801 Points ∼40% +1%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
19550 Points ∼39%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (11694 - 24180, n=29)
17844 Points ∼36% -9%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
17215 Points ∼35% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
11123 Points ∼22% -43%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
10897 Points ∼22% -44%
Asus ASUSPRO Essential P2520LA-XO0167H
Intel Core i5-5200U
6239 Points ∼13% -68%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (258 - 435, n=11)
351 s * ∼4% -30%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
292.499 s * ∼3% -9%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
269.12 s * ∼3%
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
Intel Core i5-7600K
253.57 s * ∼3% +6%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
247 s * ∼3% +8%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (1.4 - 7795, n=81)
1212 Seconds * ∼5% -129%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
638.9 Seconds * ∼3% -21%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
529.977 Seconds * ∼2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
513.599 Seconds * ∼2% +3%
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
Intel Core i5-7600K
467.526 Seconds * ∼2% +12%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6828
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
19550
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6478
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
71.15 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
6.58 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.7 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
94.44 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
589 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
165 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5228 Points ∼80% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (4063 - 5228, n=17)
4771 Points ∼73% +1%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
4732 Points ∼73%
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
4695 Points ∼72% -1%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4140 Points ∼64% -13%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5325 Points ∼56% +3%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
5153 Points ∼54%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (4643 - 5550, n=9)
5072 Points ∼53% -2%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4933 Points ∼52% -4%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4130 Points ∼68% +9%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
3792 Points ∼62%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (3145 - 4130, n=18)
3674 Points ∼60% -3%
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3632 Points ∼60% -4%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3471 Points ∼57% -8%
PCMark 10 - Score
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4106 Points ∼53% +6%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
3858 Points ∼50%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (3071 - 4106, n=16)
3681 Points ∼47% -5%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3678 Points ∼47% -5%
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3425 Points ∼44% -11%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3792 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5153 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4732 pontos
Ajuda
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
AS SSD
131%
184%
15%
-16%
-73%
Copy Game MB/s
225.15
291.41
29%
1057.86
370%
154.1
-32%
80.52
-64%
Copy Program MB/s
270.45
206.97
-23%
479.55
77%
129.74
-52%
62.69
-77%
Copy ISO MB/s
467.56
357.42
-24%
1750.73
274%
192.43
-59%
87.09
-81%
Score Total
926
2437
163%
2646
186%
855
-8%
991
7%
309
-67%
Score Write
261
1135
335%
628
141%
382
46%
323
24%
86
-67%
Score Read
441
894
103%
1367
210%
308
-30%
445
1%
157
-64%
Access Time Write *
0.088
0.038
57%
0.032
64%
0.056
36%
0.23
-161%
0.369
-319%
Access Time Read *
0.089
0.063
29%
0.054
39%
0.09
-1%
0.09
-1%
0.128
-44%
4K-64 Write
183.49
937.11
411%
392.6
114%
257.48
40%
233.14
27%
35.48
-81%
4K-64 Read
366.01
656.76
79%
1084.59
196%
234.46
-36%
368.36
1%
80.38
-78%
4K Write
47.88
107.22
124%
115.02
140%
77.23
61%
68.94
44%
39.07
-18%
4K Read
25.39
33.81
33%
48.71
92%
24.89
-2%
27.98
10%
20.15
-21%
Seq Write
300.26
907.16
202%
1205.64
302%
469.96
57%
213.71
-29%
117.15
-61%
Seq Read
494.43
2037.42
312%
2336.79
373%
487.22
-1%
483.68
-2%
561.28
14%

* ... smaller is better

SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 522.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 489.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 280.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 260.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 457.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 477.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 27.48 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 55.19 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ
6375 Points ∼16% +104%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% +32%
MSI PL62 MX150 7700HQ
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 7700HQ
3673 Points ∼9% +18%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
3574 Points ∼9% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (2323 - 3739, n=33)
3286 Points ∼8% +5%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3122 Points ∼8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 11850, n=372)
2596 Points ∼6% -17%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2069 Points ∼5% -34%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
1541 (min: 1484, max: 1547) Points ∼4% -51%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
1418 Points ∼3% -55%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
1095 Points ∼3% -65%
Dell Latitude 5590
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
954 Points ∼2% -69%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ
39511 Points ∼21% +126%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
25986 Points ∼14% +49%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
22439 Points ∼12% +28%
MSI PL62 MX150 7700HQ
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 7700HQ
21594 Points ∼12% +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (16227 - 22183, n=32)
19348 Points ∼10% +11%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
17469 Points ∼9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=374)
15419 Points ∼8% -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
11495 (min: 10969, max: 11750) Points ∼6% -34%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
11264 Points ∼6% -36%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
10816 Points ∼6% -38%
Dell Latitude 5590
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
8065 Points ∼4% -54%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
7309 Points ∼4% -58%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ
6265 Points ∼36% +81%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼25% +29%
MSI PL62 MX150 7700HQ
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 7700HQ
4277 Points ∼24% +23%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4113 Points ∼23% +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (2820 - 4421, n=35)
3932 Points ∼22% +13%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3467 Points ∼20%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2395 Points ∼14% -31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (375 - 8966, n=591)
2267 Points ∼13% -35%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
2193 (min: 2057, max: 2200) Points ∼12% -37%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
2184 Points ∼12% -37%
Dell Latitude 5590
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1299 Points ∼7% -63%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
1246 Points ∼7% -64%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ
8047 Points ∼16% +108%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% +25%
MSI PL62 MX150 7700HQ
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 7700HQ
4685 Points ∼9% +21%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4251 Points ∼8% +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (2796 - 4876, n=36)
4152 Points ∼8% +7%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3867 Points ∼8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 15256, n=595)
2706 Points ∼5% -30%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2613 Points ∼5% -32%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
2493 Points ∼5% -36%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
2379 (min: 2355, max: 2425) Points ∼5% -38%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
1668 Points ∼3% -57%
Dell Latitude 5590
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1619 Points ∼3% -58%
3DMark 11 Performance
4160 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
44383 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
12367 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2874 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
1437 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 141.477.266.928.9fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 85.761.436.421.6fps
Thief (2014) 6135.830.216.7fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 32fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 413616fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60603424fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 5135.719.214.9fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 44.931.716.414.8fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 25.71512.8fps
Overwatch (2016) 121.275.438.232.4fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 25.412.67fps
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233Tooltip
The Witcher 3 medium

Barulho

Ocioso
28.9 / 30 / 30.2 dB
Carga
41.8 / 42 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.3 dB(A)
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
Radeon Pro 560, 7820HQ
Noise
6%
1%
3%
7%
1%
off / environment *
28.3
29
-2%
29.6
-5%
30.2
-7%
28
1%
30.8
-9%
Idle Minimum *
28.9
29
-0%
29.6
-2%
30.2
-4%
28
3%
31
-7%
Idle Average *
30
29
3%
29.6
1%
30.2
-1%
28.8
4%
31
-3%
Idle Maximum *
30.2
29
4%
30.3
-0%
31.2
-3%
30.3
-0%
31
-3%
Load Average *
41.8
32
23%
40
4%
35.7
15%
34.5
17%
31.3
25%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42
40
5%
Load Maximum *
42
40.1
5%
40
5%
34.2
19%
34.3
18%
41.8
-0%

* ... smaller is better

 39.6 °C37.8 °C35 °C 
 43.6 °C37.6 °C29.4 °C 
 30.6 °C28.4 °C28 °C 
Máximo: 43.6 °C
Médio: 34.4 °C
39 °C44 °C40.4 °C
33 °C38.8 °C38.8 °C
29.8 °C32.6 °C33.4 °C
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  38 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.834.62532.6353131.831.4403131.65031.7306330.429.98029.529.510028.329.312527.428.116028.326.820036.825.825046.825.831552.12540054.32450054.723.363056.723.180060.522.810006122.5125062.322.3160062.922.2200061.722250063.521.8315058.421.6400059.421.6500056.321.5630064.521.5800062.721.31000060.621.31250057.921.21600053.921.3SPL73.234.3N31.32.2median 57.9Asus Zenbook UX430UNmedian 22.3Delta71.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus Zenbook UX430UN audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64.52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.54 / 0.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3 / 5.8 / 6.2 Watt
Carga midlight 54.1 / 56.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Huawei MateBook X
7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.3
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
8550U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Power Consumption
-17%
-42%
8%
-34%
11%
13%
Idle Minimum *
3
4.3
-43%
3.5
-17%
3.3
-10%
4.6
-53%
3.2
-7%
2.2
27%
Idle Average *
5.8
8
-38%
11.3
-95%
6.1
-5%
11
-90%
6.5
-12%
5
14%
Idle Maximum *
6.2
8.1
-31%
14.2
-129%
10.1
-63%
12
-94%
6.8
-10%
8
-29%
Load Average *
54.1
46.6
14%
53.3
1%
24.6
55%
39.5
27%
28.2
48%
33
39%
Load Maximum *
56.4
49.8
12%
56.2
-0%
22
61%
34.6
39%
36
36%
49.4
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45.9
50.6
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
17h 19min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 20min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 38min
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
8550U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
8550U, GeForce MX150, 75 Wh
Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 46 Wh
Huawei MateBook X
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime
-12%
39%
18%
-9%
22%
Reader / Idle
1039
869
-16%
1810
74%
1032
-1%
512
-51%
1351
30%
WiFi v1.3
560
408
-27%
635
13%
562
0%
337
-40%
602
8%
Load
98
106
8%
127
30%
153
56%
162
65%
124
27%

Pro

+ Tela IPS mate nítida; bons níveis de contraste
+ Interior acessível; SSD M.2 atualizável
+ Ótimas especificações para o preço
+ Design atraente e fino
+ Duração da bateria respeitável
+ Leitor de cartões SD de tamanho completo
+ Bons alto falantes

Contra

- A iluminação da tela poderia ser mais brilhante; visibilidade pobre em exteriores
- A discreta MX150 tende a se afogar abaixo da velocidade básica
- PWM em quase todos os níveis de brilho
- O cartão SD inserido sobressai por mais da metade do seu comprimento
- Sem tela táctil, refletiva, ou opções HD 4K
- Teclas suaves do teclado; com deslocamento curto
- Sem Thunderbolt 3 ou HDMI de tamanho normal
- Clickpad suave com resposta pobre
- RAM não atualizável
- Carregamento lento da bateria
- Sem opções de SSD NVMe
- A tampa pode se sentir frágil
In review: Asus ZenBook UX430UN
In review: Asus ZenBook UX430UN

Os aspectos positivos não superam a lista de negativos no UX430. Os poucos recursos que se destacam são a tela mate e o design fino, mas quase todo o resto é mediano, na melhor das hipóteses, ou não é digno de mencionar. O brilho é mais fraco do que os Ultrabooks concorrentes, o chassi é comparativamente mais flexível, o trackpad é suave e as teclas do teclado poderiam ter sido mais firmes. Ao mergulhar mais fundo no hardware, é decepcionante encontrar um ruído da bobina e uma GPU de limitação que não seja capaz de sustentar nem mesmo a velocidade básica ao longo do tempo.

A principal vantagem do UX430UN é seu preço de $1200. Suas especificações são impressionantes com uma CPU Core i7 de 8ª geração, 16 GB de RAM, SSD de 512 GB e até mesmo gráficos GeForce Pascal dedicados. Um sistema com especificações similares como o Samsung NP900X5T ou Spectre x360 15 são vendidos por bastante mais e até mesmo o XPS 13 está a partir de USD $1000 com apenas uma fração das especificações principais. Nessa perspectiva, o UX430UN pode ser considerado um excelente valor pelo desempenho, desde que os usuários estejam cientes de sua lista de inconvenientes.

Ótimas especificações por um ótimo preço. O hardware real, no entanto, poderia melhorar em quase todas as frentes para competir melhor na faixa de preços de 4 dígitos. Esperamos ver um design mais rígido e uma tela mais brilhante para melhorar a usabilidade em exteriores em futuras iterações.

Asus Zenbook UX430UN - 03/23/2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
70 / 98 → 71%
Teclado
74%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
46 / 81 → 57%
Peso
71 / 20-67 → 100%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
72 / 85 → 85%
Desempenho da aplicação
88 / 92 → 95%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
88 / 95 → 93%
Audio
70%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Médio
75%
83%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook UX430UN (i7-8550U, GeForce MX150)
Allen Ngo, 2018-03-27 (Update: 2018-04- 1)