Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 17ISK

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/04/2016

Um Y700 melhorado. O Y900 de gama superior se sente único com mais recursos e melhor acabamento que o seu predecessor Y700. Infelizmente, o seu teclado mecânico chiclet, ventoinhas barulhentas, e preço inicial alto, deixam muito a desejar.

Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 (IdeaPad Y900 Serie)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1038 MHz, Memoría: 5010 MHz, GDDR5, 372.54
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4, PC4-17000, 1300 MHz, 15-15-15-36, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Name: LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1, ID: LGD0469, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, 256 GB 
, Sekundär: 1 TB Western Digital WDC WD10SPCX-24HWST1
Placa de Som
Nvidia GM204 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm Kopfhörer, 3.5 mm Mikrofon, Card Reader: SD-Leser
Funcionamento em rede
Qualcomm/Atheros e2400 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 36 x 427 x 318
Bateria
90 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo + Subwoofer, Teclado: Chiclet mechanisch, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Lenovo Nerve Center, Magic Y Key, Training Manual Software, Lenovo Solution Center, Dolby Audio, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
4.4 kg, Suprimento de energia: 965 g
Preço
2400 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: Novo Recovery button, SD reader, 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm headset, 2x USB 2.0, Kensington Lock
Right: Novo Recovery button, SD reader, 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm headset, 2x USB 2.0, Kensington Lock
Left: AC adapter, DisplayPort ???, HDMI 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, USB Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.0
Left: AC adapter, DisplayPort ???, HDMI 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, USB Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.0
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
518.333 MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
467.9 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
544 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
531.839 MBit/s ∼98%
334.3
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
342.1
cd/m²
338.3
cd/m²
344.9
cd/m²
326.4
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
315.7
cd/m²
298.7
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 346 cd/m² Médio: 329 cd/m² Minimum: 2.69 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 344.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 988:1 (Preto: 0.349 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.49 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.63 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
86.4% sRGB (Argyll) 56.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.11
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
17.3, 1920x1080
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
EVGA SC17
IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Asus G752VS-XB78K
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
-41%
2%
0%
-78%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34.8 (14, 20.8)
51.6 (20, 31.6)
-48%
34.4 (15.6, 18.8)
1%
37 (13, 24)
-6%
69.6 (28.4, 41.2)
-100%
38 (14, 24)
-9%
Response Time Black / White *
25.6 (4.8, 20.8)
34.4 (5.2, 29.2)
-34%
25.2 (4.8, 20.4)
2%
24 (5, 19)
6%
40 (10, 30)
-56%
22 (4, 18)
14%
PWM Frequency
1000 (29)
Screen
7%
8%
18%
4%
7%
Brightness middle
344.9
349.7
1%
348.7
1%
336
-3%
394.1
14%
328
-5%
Brightness
329
332
1%
327
-1%
320
-3%
368
12%
317
-4%
Brightness Distribution
86
90
5%
89
3%
88
2%
83
-3%
88
2%
Black Level *
0.349
0.304
13%
0.323
7%
0.25
28%
0.439
-26%
0.3
14%
Contrast
988
1150
16%
1080
9%
1344
36%
898
-9%
1093
11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.49
3.99
11%
4.09
9%
3.61
20%
5.79
-29%
3.74
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.72
8.74
-0%
9.02
-3%
6.02
31%
8.44
3%
8.97
-3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.63
3.34
28%
2.14
54%
4.78
-3%
4.23
9%
2.67
42%
Gamma
2.11 114%
2.23 108%
2.25 107%
2.32 103%
2.11 114%
2.41 100%
CCT
6905 94%
6111 106%
6885 94%
6185 105%
7479 87%
6861 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56.7
55.8
-2%
56.9
0%
88
55%
86.6
53%
56
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86.4
84.8
-2%
86.5
0%
100
16%
100
16%
85
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-17% / -1%
5% / 7%
9% / 15%
-37% / -10%
5% / 6%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
166 Points ∼28% +9%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451
Intel Core i7-6820HK
158 Points ∼27% +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
152 Points ∼26%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
143 Points ∼24% -6%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
131 Points ∼22% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
865 Points ∼40% +22%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451
Intel Core i7-6820HK
860 Points ∼40% +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
707 Points ∼33%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
682 Points ∼32% -4%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
641 Points ∼30% -9%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.91 Points ∼84% +14%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.78 Points ∼78% +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.67 Points ∼74%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.66 Points ∼73% -1%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points ∼66% -11%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points ∼66% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
9.56 Points ∼40% +24%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451
Intel Core i7-6820HK
9.53 Points ∼40% +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.73 Points ∼32%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.53 Points ∼32% -3%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.94 Points ∼29% -10%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.94 Points ∼29% -10%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
6487 Points ∼73% +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
5559 Points ∼63%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5449 Points ∼61% -2%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
26150 Points ∼53% +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
20910 Points ∼42%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
18785 Points ∼38% -10%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
229.223 s * ∼3%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
210.067 s * ∼2% +8%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
178.464 s * ∼2% +22%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
561.953 Seconds * ∼2% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
556.105 Seconds * ∼2%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
498.33 Seconds * ∼2% +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
10260
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20910
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5559
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.73 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
71.32 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.67 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
152 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
109.55 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
707 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
5533 Points ∼85%
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122
5095 Points ∼78% -8%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
5044 Points ∼77% -9%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122
7636 Points ∼80% +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
6609 Points ∼69%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
4762 Points ∼50% -28%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
2303 Points ∼24% -65%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4952 Points ∼83%
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122
4620 Points ∼77% -7%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4060 Points ∼68% -18%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
3848 Points ∼64% -22%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4952 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6609 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5533 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122
EVGA SC17
Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-55%
-58%
21%
23%
Write 4k QD32
345.3
138.9
-60%
236.9
-31%
422
22%
578
67%
Read 4k QD32
538.9
358.8
-33%
147.5
-73%
635.2
18%
743.9
38%
Write 4k
140.3
96.95
-31%
99.36
-29%
149.2
6%
154.4
10%
Read 4k
49.32
36.89
-25%
23.1
-53%
52.13
6%
44.42
-10%
Write 512
1228
156.5
-87%
319.2
-74%
1490
21%
1438
17%
Read 512
850
435.6
-49%
288.9
-66%
1113
31%
1250
47%
Write Seq
1254
156.3
-88%
338.5
-73%
1534
22%
1305
4%
Read Seq
1559
513.2
-67%
529
-66%
2247
44%
1718
10%
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Sequential Read: 1559 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1254 MB/s
512K Read: 850 MB/s
512K Write: 1228 MB/s
4K Read: 49.32 MB/s
4K Write: 140.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 538.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 345.3 MB/s
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
3009 Points ∼30% +29%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
2592 Points ∼26% +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
2326 Points ∼23%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
2299 Points ∼23% -1%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
974 Points ∼10% -58%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
6123 Points ∼31% +32%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
5541 Points ∼28% +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
4650 Points ∼23%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
4623 Points ∼23% -1%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
2012 Points ∼10% -57%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
13018 Points ∼32% +32%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
11957 Points ∼29% +21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9888 Points ∼24%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
9608 Points ∼24% -3%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4318 Points ∼11% -56%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9842 Points ∼56%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
9017 Points ∼51% -8%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
8343 Points ∼47% -15%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
8338 Points ∼47% -15%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5474 Points ∼31% -44%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
16946 Points ∼33% +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
13168 Points ∼26%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
12731 Points ∼25% -3%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12472 Points ∼24% -5%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5237 Points ∼10% -60%
3DMark 11 Performance
12267 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
134877 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
26493 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8653 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4478 pontos
Ajuda
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
75.2 fps ∼100% +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
58.1 fps ∼77%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.5 fps ∼76% -1%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
44.9 fps ∼60% -23%
Guild Wars 2 - 1920x1080 All Maximum / On AA:FX
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
58.2 fps ∼100%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
52.9 fps ∼91% -9%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
106.2 fps ∼100% +18%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
105.5 fps ∼99% +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
90.2 fps ∼85%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
86.4 fps ∼81% -4%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
69.5 fps ∼65% -23%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
88.3 fps ∼100% +32%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
82.1 fps ∼93% +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
66.8 fps ∼76%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
50.5 fps ∼57% -24%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
72.4 fps ∼100% +17%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
67.9 fps ∼94% +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
62.1 fps ∼86%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
58.6 fps ∼81% -6%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
47.5 fps ∼66% -24%
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
63 fps ∼100% +24%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
62 fps ∼98% +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
51 fps ∼81%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
36 fps ∼57% -29%
Metal Gear Solid V - 1920x1080 Extra High / On
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
60 fps ∼100%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
60 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
79.3 fps ∼100% +38%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
71.6 fps ∼90% +25%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.9 fps ∼73% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
57.4 fps ∼72%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
43.5 fps ∼55% -24%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
63.5 fps ∼100% +25%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
60.4 fps ∼95% +19%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
55 fps ∼87% +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
50.6 fps ∼80%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps ∼67% -15%
Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
96.5 fps ∼100% +17%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
84.3 fps ∼87% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
82.3 fps ∼85%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
56 fps ∼58% -32%
Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
118.2 fps ∼100% +38%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
106.3 fps ∼90% +24%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
87.3 fps ∼74% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
85.7 fps ∼73%
baixo média alto ultra
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 58.1fps
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 58.2fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 90.2fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 66.8fps
Thief (2014) 62.1fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 51fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 57.4fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 50.6fps
Doom (2016) 82.3fps
Overwatch (2016) 85.7fps

Barulho

Ocioso
29.4 / 32.4 / 48 dB
Carga
42.5 / 48.5 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Noise
10%
4%
5%
-3%
off / environment *
28.8
28.9
-0%
30
-4%
31
-8%
Idle Minimum *
29.4
28
5%
32.4
-10%
31
-5%
33
-12%
Idle Average *
32.4
28.1
13%
32.4
-0%
32
1%
34
-5%
Idle Maximum *
48
31.5
34%
32.4
32%
33
31%
40
17%
Load Average *
42.5
40.6
4%
39.4
7%
40
6%
44
-4%
Load Maximum *
48.5
51
-5%
52
-7%
47
3%
50
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 37.6 °C49 °C36.8 °C 
 32.8 °C40 °C36.2 °C 
 24.4 °C23.8 °C28.8 °C 
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 34.4 °C
38.6 °C39.2 °C38.8 °C
32.2 °C36.4 °C32.4 °C
30.2 °C30 °C31.2 °C
Máximo: 39.2 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  41.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.437.42534.337.73134.136.44035.635.55033.635.56332.435.68033.339.410031.641.112530.2541602963.620028.468.125026.669.131526.86740026.267.45002671.56302581.580024.381100024.27812502477.4160023.577.6200023.372.9250023.572.8315023.272.9400023.270500023.266.9630023.263.3800023.2551000023.354.11250023.348.21600023.444.1SPL03687.1N2.668.1median 24Lenovo IdeaPad Y900median 68.1Delta1.76.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.35 / 0.88 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 24.3 / 29.6 / 29.9 Watt
Carga midlight 110.1 / 171.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
9%
-20%
-3%
54%
Idle Minimum *
24.3
20.6
15%
25
-3%
22.6
7%
5.3
78%
Idle Average *
29.6
22.1
25%
35
-18%
32.7
-10%
10.6
64%
Idle Maximum *
29.9
22.5
25%
46
-54%
32.8
-10%
11.8
61%
Load Average *
110.1
130.6
-19%
103
6%
114.7
-4%
70.9
36%
Load Maximum *
171.4
177.2
-3%
223
-30%
167.9
2%
119.8
30%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
5h 49min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 08min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 16min
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 90 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 60 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, 64 Wh
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 90 Wh
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 83 Wh
Battery Runtime
33%
-30%
-21%
-17%
Reader / Idle
349
688
97%
273
-22%
311
-11%
323
-7%
WiFi v1.3
248
334
35%
187
-25%
210
-15%
221
-11%
Load
136
91
-33%
76
-44%
84
-38%
93
-32%

Pro

+ Temperaturas da superfície e do núcleo relativamente baixas
+ Grandes teclas com teclas Macro dedicadas
+ Compatibilidade RAID 0; 3 baias de armazenamento
+ Design exclusivo; qualidade de construção forte
+ Amplas opções da iluminação de fundo do teclado
+ USB Tipo-C c/ Thunderbolt 3
+ Alto falantes internos muito fortes
+ Teclas mecânicas removíveis
+ Sem afogamento da CPU ou GPU
+ G-Sync

Contra

- Modo Turbo decepcionante; altas temperaturas da CPU sob cargas extremas
- O teclado não oferece teclas com iluminação RGB individual "de verdade"
- Comportamento pulsante da ventoinha durante cargas baixas
- A reprodução do som poderia ser mais balanceada
- Sem opções de tela de 120 Hz/5 ms ou 4K UHD
- Forte ruído da ventoinha durante os jogos
- Sem controles da ventoinha personalizáveis
- GPU não atualizáveis
- Acessibilidade difícil
- Duração média da bateria
- Resposta suave do teclado
- Caro
In review: Lenovo Ideapad Y900-17ISK. Test model provided by Lenovo US.
In review: Lenovo Ideapad Y900-17ISK. Test model provided by Lenovo US.

A Lenovo está pisando em terreno mais profundo com o seu novo Y900 e o preço de $2000+ USD é a prova disso. Enquanto o design e o acabamento são sólidos, o novo teclado mecânico e Modo Turbo são um pacote misturado. As teclas se sentem suaves e irregulares e alguns usuários podem não gostar da resposta táctil. Enquanto isso, o modo Turbo oferece poucos benefícios para os jogos e recomendamos deixa-lo ligado o tempo todo durante os jogos, dado que não existem verdadeiras desvantagens em deixa-lo desligado durante o uso intenso.

Outra grande desvantagem é a estranha pulsação da ventoinha do sistema e a falta de controles da ventoinha personalizáveis no momento da análise. Isto eventualmente poderia ser resolvido, mas os usuários devem evitar utilizar o portátil em ambientes sensíveis ao ruído, inclusive quando ajustado nas configurações de economia de energia. O ruído da ventoinha ao jogar é um pouco mais forte que a maioria dos outros portáteis de 17-polegadas salvo pelo mais fino MSI GS73VR ou alternativas GigabyteAorus X7 Pro v5.

Em seu núcleo, o Y900 oferece forte desempenho com temperaturas relativamente baixas sem afogamento da CPU ou GPU. Apesar de tudo, tivemos dificuldade para encontrar suficiente valor no sistema para recomenda-lo sobre algo menos caro como o GT72VR com sua fácil manutenção e capacidade de atualização da GPU MXM 3.0b.

O mais recente portátil de jogos carro chefe da Lenovo é um grande passo para frente em termos de qualidade e design, mas no final fica para trás por causa de suas irritantes ventoinhas pulsantes, falta de opções de configuração da tela, teclas chiclet mecânicas, e baixo valor pelo alto preço, especialmente agora que os portáteis concorrentes estão sendo entregues com a mais eficiente GPU GTX 1060.

Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 - 10/10/2016 v5.1
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
82 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
73%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
64 / 81 → 79%
Peso
45 / 10-66 → 63%
Bateria
76%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
92%
Desempenho da aplicação
96%
Temperatura
90 / 95 → 95%
Ruído
60 / 90 → 67%
Audio
70%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Médio
74%
81%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 17ISK
Allen Ngo, 2016-10- 4 (Update: 2016-10-13)