Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH: A bateria simplesmente não morrerá
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Legion 5 17 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-10300H 4 x 2.5 - 4.5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1515 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 27.21.14.5638 (Nvidia 456.38), Optimus
Memória
8 GB
, DDR4-3200, modo single-channel, dois bancos de memória (um ocupado)
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.3, IPS, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B, 512 GB
, 1x M.2-2242, 1x M.2 ou 1x 2.5" (livre), 421 GB livre
peso
2.912 kg, Suprimento de energia: 418 g
Preço
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.9 % | 10/2020 | Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.9 kg | 26.2 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 78.5 % | 05/2020 | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 23.1 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.9 % | 05/2020 | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.6 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.6 % | 07/2019 | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.8 kg | 25 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
11 ∆E
19 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
22 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
16 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B173HAN04.3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 326 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 304.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 326 cd/m²
Contraste: 1304:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.53
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.261
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 AU Optronics B173HAN04.3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR AU Optronics B173HAN04.7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 BOE NV173FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl BOE0825, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -42% | -41% | -9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.4 | 39.46 -43% | 40.55 -42% | 63.3 -9% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.1 | 58.4 -40% | 59.7 -39% | 90.2 -7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.2 | 40.77 -43% | 41.89 -41% | 64.3 -10% |
| Response Times | 9% | 37% | 24% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38.4 ? | 34 ? 11% | 22.4 ? 42% | 31.6 ? 18% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 26.4 ? 6% | 19.2 ? 31% | 19.6 ? 30% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | -40% | -37% | -13% | |
| Brightness middle | 326 | 251.2 -23% | 264.8 -19% | 299.6 -8% |
| Brightness | 304 | 242 -20% | 253 -17% | 285 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 92 3% | 90 1% | 86 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.34 -36% | 0.31 -24% | 0.33 -32% |
| Contrast | 1304 | 739 -43% | 854 -35% | 908 -30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.42 | 4.5 -2% | 4.73 -7% | 3.68 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.44 | 20 -112% | 18.89 -100% | 8.05 15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.53 | 3.91 -156% | 4.64 -203% | 3.15 -106% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 4 31% | 1.4 76% | 3.8 34% |
| Gamma | 2.261 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.16 102% | 2.12 104% |
| CCT | 6822 95% | 5882 111% | 6641 98% | 7240 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 71 | 37.3 -47% | 38.4 -46% | 58.1 -18% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 58.1 -38% | 59.3 -36% | 89.8 -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -24% /
-35% | -14% /
-29% | 1% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø850 (539.07-902.4)
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H; Leistungsmodus: Ø896 (884.13-901.49)
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø768 (755.39-839.42)
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1773 (1724.58-1815.79)
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1077 (1065.56-1205.55)
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (108 - 194, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (536 - 921, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (479 - 555, n=14) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 | |
| 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (2945 - 4956, n=14) | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (15146 - 24841, n=14) | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (312 - 470, n=15) | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus ) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (1397 - 2240, n=15) | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (703 - 1241, n=16) | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (2783 - 4728, n=16) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (6.13 - 7.78, n=14) | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (23.9 - 94, n=14) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (0.625 - 1.088, n=14) | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3181 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2954 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4265 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4077 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (4077 - 5301, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4166 - 6653, n=34, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (3181 - 3971, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4622 - 7085, n=32, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (4265 - 5276, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
* ... smaller is better
SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2263 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1022 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
518 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
499.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1241 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1053 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
44.84 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
134.7 MB/s
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Average SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 13% | 28% | 27% | -4% | |
| Write 4K | 134.7 | 140.7 4% | 189.7 41% | 135.3 0% | 135.9 ? 1% |
| Read 4K | 44.84 | 43.18 -4% | 62.3 39% | 63.7 42% | 45.3 ? 1% |
| Write Seq | 1053 | 1829 74% | 1681 60% | 1337 27% | 1057 ? 0% |
| Read Seq | 1241 | 1095 -12% | 1608 30% | 1617 30% | 1144 ? -8% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 499.8 | 431.7 -14% | 468.6 -6% | 568 14% | 458 ? -8% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 518 | 527 2% | 541 4% | 645 25% | 425 ? -18% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1022 | 1831 79% | 1770 73% | 1428 40% | 1040 ? 2% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2263 | 1708 -25% | 1898 -16% | 3184 41% | 2274 ? 0% |
| AS SSD | -38% | -7% | 15% | 1% | |
| Seq Read | 1635 | 1007 -38% | 1320 -19% | 1709 5% | 1601 ? -2% |
| Seq Write | 913 | 1755 92% | 1539 69% | 1345 47% | 879 ? -4% |
| 4K Read | 46.18 | 39.88 -14% | 56.3 22% | 49.73 8% | 48.7 ? 5% |
| 4K Write | 101.7 | 111.6 10% | 158.5 56% | 108.2 6% | 114.9 ? 13% |
| 4K-64 Read | 773 | 751 -3% | 586 -24% | 731 -5% | 764 ? -1% |
| 4K-64 Write | 745 | 402.6 -46% | 820 10% | 1233 66% | 754 ? 1% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.05 | 0.084 -68% | 0.043 14% | 0.073 -46% | 0.0535 ? -7% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.037 | 0.151 -308% | 0.113 -205% | 0.034 8% | 0.034 ? 8% |
| Score Read | 983 | 892 -9% | 775 -21% | 951 -3% | 973 ? -1% |
| Score Write | 938 | 690 -26% | 1132 21% | 1476 57% | 957 ? 2% |
| Score Total | 2399 | 2085 -13% | 2333 -3% | 2909 21% | 2405 ? 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-17% | 11% /
8% | 21% /
20% | -2% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reads: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11495 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26934 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8485 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3584 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
The Witcher 3 | F1 2020 | Death Stranding | Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Doom Eternal | Mafia Definitive Edition
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (29.9 - 40.3, n=31) | |
| F1 2020 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 305, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (48.3 - 63, n=5) | |
| 1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.1 - 413, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (156 - 208, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| Death Stranding | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (14.3 - 163, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (56.5 - 57.8, n=4) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (27.3 - 200, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (100.8 - 111, n=4) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (52.7 - 187.9, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (43.3 - 44.9, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (219 - 280, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (66.2 - 103, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B; FPS: Ø40.1 (36-43)
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G: Ø33.8 (31-37)
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ: Ø47.1 (43-51)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 250.1 | 217.9 | 205.7 | 93.2 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 172.7 | 117.3 | 69.5 | 40.3 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 83 | 62 | 52 | 45 |
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 139 | 84.3 | 69.2 | |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 156 | 100 | 80 | 57 |
| Death Stranding (2020) | 100.8 | 64 | 59.5 | 57.6 |
| Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) | 50.4 | 35.9 | 25.5 | 17.5 |
| Serious Sam 4 (2020) | 99.3 | 48.4 | 40.6 | 27.8 |
| Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 66.2 | 47.1 | 43.3 | |
| Star Wars Squadrons (2020) | 179.1 | 122.6 | 108.7 | 100 |
| FIFA 21 (2020) | 153.2 | 125.8 | 120.4 | 113.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 24 / 25 / 29 dB |
| Carga |
| 43 / 51 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -9% | -12% | -1% | -7% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 28.4 -18% | 28.7 -20% | 28.2 -18% | 27.6 ? -15% | 24.1 ? -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24 | 33 -38% | 28.7 -20% | 30.1 -25% | 28.1 ? -17% | 25.6 ? -7% |
| Idle Average * | 25 | 33 -32% | 30.5 -22% | 30.1 -20% | 28.8 ? -15% | 27.4 ? -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29 | 33.1 -14% | 32.5 -12% | 30.1 -4% | 31 ? -7% | 30.7 ? -6% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 37.7 12% | 42.5 1% | 34.2 20% | 41.7 ? 3% | 43.1 ? -0% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46 | 39.2 15% | 50.1 -9% | 34.2 26% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 51 | 46 10% | 53.4 -5% | 43.8 14% | 46.4 ? 9% | 53.4 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -8% | -2% | -8% | 3% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 42 11% | 47.6 -1% | 42.6 9% | 46 ? 2% | 46 ? 2% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 44 | 53.4 -21% | 50.8 -15% | 49 -11% | 49.2 ? -12% | 49.5 ? -13% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 35 | 34.2 2% | 33 6% | 34 3% | 28.3 ? 19% | 31.4 ? 10% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30 | 37.4 -25% | 29 3% | 39.4 -31% | 28.9 ? 4% | 32.5 ? -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.8 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2 / 8 / 16 Watt |
| Carga |
58 / 169 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -120% | -73% | -41% | -34% | -188% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2 | 13 -550% | 7.4 -270% | 5.4 -170% | 4.96 ? -148% | 13.8 ? -590% |
| Idle Average * | 8 | 15.7 -96% | 10.5 -31% | 9.2 -15% | 8.61 ? -8% | 19.2 ? -140% |
| Idle Maximum * | 16 | 21 -31% | 17 -6% | 13 19% | 14.8 ? 7% | 27 ? -69% |
| Load Average * | 58 | 87 -50% | 103.7 -79% | 85.9 -48% | 81.7 ? -41% | 111.3 ? -92% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 89 | 96.4 -8% | 128.1 -44% | 107.9 -21% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 169 | 145.8 14% | 183.2 -8% | 182.2 -8% | 131.9 ? 22% | 251 ? -49% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 80 Wh | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 51 Wh | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 90 Wh | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 52.5 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -55% | 1% | -48% | -45% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1399 | 463 -67% | 543 -61% | 695 -50% | 544 ? -61% |
| H.264 | 860 | 399 ? -54% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 683 | 283 -59% | 512 -25% | 339 -50% | 368 ? -46% |
| Load | 104 | 63 -39% | 196 88% | 59 -43% | 84.2 ? -19% |
Pro
+ Tela IPS
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ SSD NVMe
+ Excelente duração da bateria
+ Capaz de funcionar silenciosamente
Contra
- A memória de trabalho funciona no modo de canal único
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
O Legion 5 tem um processador Core i5-10300H (Comet Lake) e núcleo gráfico GeForce GTX-1650 dedicado que em combinação roda todos os jogos de computador atuais fluentemente na tela. As resoluções e configurações de qualidade mais altas são possíveis apenas até certo ponto. O modo Silencioso é capaz de transformar o portátil para jogos em um silencioso cavalo de trabalho que só incomoda o usuário o menos possível com o ruído de ventilador.
Oficialmente, o Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 é considerado um portátil para jogos. No entanto, a variante de equipamento testada aqui pode ser facilmente considerada um polivalente que atinge uma boa figura em vários cenários de uso.
Com 8 GB de memória de trabalho e um SSD NVMe de 512 GB, A quantidade de armazenamento disponível não é muito abundante. No entanto, existem algumas opções de expansão. Por exemplo, você pode ou deveria instalar um segundo módulo de memória funcional para ativar o modo de canal duplo. Além do SSD atualmente presente, também há espaço interno para um drive de 2,5 polegadas ou um segundo SSD NMVe.
A tela Full-HD IPS oferece ângulos de visão estáveis, uma superfície mate, brilho suficiente e um bom contraste, reprodução de cores aceitável e uma cobertura decente do espaço de cores. O teclado iluminado integrado é adequado para tarefas diárias e a duração da bateria é excelente.
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
-
10/17/2020 v7
Sascha Mölck
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Pricecompare
