Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GS75 8SG Stealth (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q)

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/31/2019

Good-looking. O novíssimo GS75 não pertence apenas aos portáteis de jogos mais planos do mercado, mas também aos mais bonitos. Em nossa análise detalhada, você descobrirá se o dispositivo de 17 polegadas também pode brilhar sob o capô.

MSI GS75 8SG Stealth (GS75 Serie)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Análises do: 735 MHz, Memoría: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 419.35, Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual-Channel, todos os slots ocupados
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, Full HD, 144Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disco rígido
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0),  GB 
, Slots: 3x M.2 Type 2280 (um slot livre)
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 fone, 1 microfone, Card Reader: microSD
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19 x 396 x 259
Bateria
80.25 Wh, 5280 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet, RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força de 230 Watts, Guia de início rápido, Manual de recuperação, Dragon Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.278 kg, Suprimento de energia: 725 g
Preço
3800 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size comparison

412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg397 mm 268.5 mm 27.5 mm 2.6 kg396 mm 261 mm 27.5 mm 2.5 kg399 mm 272 mm 19 mm 2.6 kg396 mm 259 mm 19 mm 2.3 kg
Left side: DC in, RJ45 LAN, USB Type-A 3.1 Gen 2, microSD, microphone, headphones
Left side: DC in, RJ45 LAN, USB Type-A 3.1 Gen 2, microSD, microphone, headphones
Right side: USB Type-C 3.0, 2x USB Type-A 3.1 Gen 2, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, Kensington lock
Right side: USB Type-C 3.0, 2x USB Type-A 3.1 Gen 2, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, Kensington lock
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
697 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
MSI GE75 8SF
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
658 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
599 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=223)
599 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE75 8SF
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
686 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s ∼98% +4%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
651 MBit/s ∼95%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 MBit/s ∼94% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
605 MBit/s ∼88% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 721, n=223)
547 MBit/s ∼80% -16%
329
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 355 cd/m² Médio: 327 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 355 cd/m²
Contraste: 1365:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.54 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 0.77
ΔE Greyscale 2.19 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
95% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 1920x1080
Schenker XMG Neo 17
BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GE75 8SF
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
3%
-69%
-89%
-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.6 (3.8, 3.8)
7.2 (3.6, 3.6)
5%
15.6 (8, 7.6)
-105%
18.8 (9.6, 9.2)
-147%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
-26%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
-0%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-33%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-25%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
-8%
PWM Frequency
25510 (17)
971 (99)
-96%
25770 (17)
1%
Screen
-29%
-99%
-31%
-1%
Brightness middle
355
288
-19%
299.1
-16%
304
-14%
370.4
4%
Brightness
327
287
-12%
273
-17%
289
-12%
348
6%
Brightness Distribution
85
91
7%
81
-5%
90
6%
89
5%
Black Level *
0.26
0.2
23%
0.27
-4%
0.26
-0%
0.29
-12%
Contrast
1365
1440
5%
1108
-19%
1169
-14%
1277
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.54
2.33
-51%
5.07
-229%
2.65
-72%
1.26
18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3
5.34
-78%
10.55
-252%
6.11
-104%
3.02
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.77
2.47
-221%
3.31
-330%
1.5
-95%
1.21
-57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.19
1.19
46%
6.8
-211%
2.75
-26%
1.4
36%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.46 89%
2.2 100%
CCT
6893 94%
6710 97%
7805 83%
6763 96%
6747 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
57
-7%
58.5
-4%
60
-2%
59.7
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
95
88
-7%
89.9
-5%
92
-3%
94.4
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-13% / -24%
-84% / -95%
-60% / -43%
-6% / -3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.8 ms rise
↘ 3.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 25510 Hz ≤ 17 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 25510 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 25510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9554 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240Tooltip
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1017 (1007.38-1101.08)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1112 (1090.93-1218.55)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1139 (1122.59-1232.82)
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.08 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
175 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1101 Points
Ajuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=467)
154 Points ∼88% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
1233 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1218 Points ∼99% +11%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
Intel Core i7-8750H
1101 Points ∼89%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
1066 Points ∼86% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
1042 Points ∼85% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=470)
793 Points ∼64% -28%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.94 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=416)
1.685 Points ∼85% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.5 Points ∼100% +12%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.08 Points ∼89%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.51 Points ∼85% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.4, n=517)
7.37 Points ∼55% -39%
PCMark 10 - Score
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6053 Points ∼100% +8%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5605 Points ∼93%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5596 Points ∼92% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5411 Points ∼89% -3%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5138 Points ∼85% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=163)
5116 Points ∼85% -9%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
MSI GE75 8SF
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
AS SSD
10%
-29%
23%
-49%
Score Total
4123
4771
16%
2784
-32%
5248
27%
2109
-49%
Score Write
1558
2091
34%
1441
-8%
2413
55%
799
-49%
Score Read
1708
1721
1%
878
-49%
1869
9%
869
-49%
4K-64 Write
1197.05
1733.9
45%
1212.35
1%
2048.1
71%
650.03
-46%
4K-64 Read
1366.28
1576.8
15%
727.26
-47%
1579.26
16%
748.37
-45%
4K Write
94.41
122.46
30%
96.04
2%
117.57
25%
67.12
-29%
4K Read
40.89
53.01
30%
35.05
-14%
53.48
31%
25.36
-38%
Seq Write
2667.63
2347.01
-12%
1328.15
-50%
2468.54
-7%
822.99
-69%
Seq Read
3004.86
910.97
-70%
1152.78
-62%
2359.28
-21%
948.8
-68%
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3537 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3440 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 350.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 304.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2896 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2862 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 39.45 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 86.34 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4655 Points ∼100% +11%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
4231 Points ∼91% +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (1540 - 5942, n=30)
4218 Points ∼91% +1%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4193 Points ∼90%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
4102 Points ∼88% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4009 Points ∼86% -4%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8512 Points ∼100% +12%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7789 Points ∼92% +3%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7587 Points ∼89%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7202 Points ∼85% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=112)
5529 Points ∼65% -27%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
21515 Points ∼100% +8%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
20236 Points ∼94% +2%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
19875 Points ∼92%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
19800 Points ∼92% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18520 Points ∼86% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=493)
10931 Points ∼51% -45%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29453 Points ∼100% +11%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
26449 Points ∼90%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
26097 Points ∼89% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
25765 Points ∼87% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
25248 Points ∼86% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=568)
12773 Points ∼43% -52%
3DMark 11 Performance
19735 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15962 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
7180 pontos
Ajuda
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0): Ø74.4 (67-80)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø80.8 (71-85)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ: Ø69.7 (63-76)
The Witcher 3
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
57.6 (min: 49) fps ∼100% +14%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
50.6 (min: 43) fps ∼88%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
49.5 fps ∼86% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.3 - 89.2, n=52)
41.4 fps ∼72% -18%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
81.7 (min: 68) fps ∼100% +8%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
75.4 (min: 62) fps ∼92%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
73.1 fps ∼89% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
73 fps ∼89% -3%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
70.9 fps ∼87% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=267)
48 fps ∼59% -36%
baixo média alto ultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 75.450.6fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 755833fps
Battlefield V (2018) 11291.252.4fps
Apex Legends (2019) 130128fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 9282fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 66.454fps
Anthem (2019) 86.178.9fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 14385.1fps
The Division 2 (2019) 9377fps

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 32 / 41 dB
Carga
47 / 48 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
3%
10%
5%
0%
4%
off / environment *
30
29
3%
28.3
6%
29
3%
28.3
6%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=270)
2%
Idle Minimum *
31
29
6%
31.5
-2%
29
6%
33.5
-8%
31.5 (28 - 41.7, n=693)
-2%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
31.6
1%
32
-0%
33.6
-5%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=693)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
41
33
20%
31.6
23%
33
20%
35
15%
34.7 (28 - 51, n=693)
15%
Load Average *
47
47
-0%
32.3
31%
42
11%
38
19%
40.6 (30.3 - 58, n=694)
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47
49
-4%
43
9%
49
-4%
50
-6%
Load Maximum *
48
51
-6%
45.5
5%
49
-2%
56.9
-19%
47.9 (38.9 - 64.1, n=694)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

 48 °C48 °C48 °C 
 43 °C46 °C44 °C 
 38 °C40 °C38 °C 
Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 43.7 °C
57 °C58 °C47 °C
53 °C54 °C44 °C
40 °C41 °C39 °C
Máximo: 58 °C
Médio: 48.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 41.9 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-11.3 °C / -20.3 F).
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
1%
4%
0%
9%
0%
Maximum Upper Side *
48
53
-10%
38.6
20%
47
2%
41.2
14%
45.7 (28 - 68.8, n=659)
5%
Maximum Bottom *
58
50
14%
43.6
25%
56
3%
46
21%
49.3 (25.9 - 78, n=657)
15%
Idle Upper Side *
29
27
7%
30.2
-4%
28
3%
26.2
10%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=610)
-6%
Idle Bottom *
28
30
-7%
35
-25%
30
-7%
30.2
-8%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=608)
-13%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.638.72532.135.33128314035.537.95028.529.76327.329.88025.529.810025.530.212524.228.916022.929.820024.335.825024.139.231521.24440020.851.150019.354.363018.161.480017.868.8100018.169.5125018.869.3160017.669.6200017.368.7250017.963.6315017.764400017.858.9500017.759.9630017.657.2800017.5561000017.854.71250017.6591600017.557.9SPL30.377.6N1.436.1median 17.9median 57.9Delta2.31040.943.13638.231.531.732.539.126.729.826.13026.228.826.933.226.233.822.94224.250.122.451.520.353.720.153.119.755.619.160.719631964.717.768.617.367.417.465.617.464.117.45717.558.717.663.517.46317.560.517.557.517.461.417.361.330.375.81.435.6median 17.7median 60.52.56hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GS75 8SG StealthMSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 1.6 / 2.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 13 / 17 / 23 Watt
Carga midlight 90 / 215 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-22%
-20%
0%
-18%
-26%
Idle Minimum *
13
19
-46%
20.2
-55%
13
-0%
16.4
-26%
19.8 (3.5 - 113, n=653)
-52%
Idle Average *
17
22
-29%
27.2
-60%
16
6%
21.9
-29%
25.3 (6.8 - 119, n=653)
-49%
Idle Maximum *
23
30
-30%
28.7
-25%
21
9%
25.4
-10%
30.4 (8.3 - 122, n=653)
-32%
Load Average *
90
104
-16%
90.8
-1%
96
-7%
90.7
-1%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=644)
-16%
Load Maximum *
215
203
6%
165.4
23%
191
11%
222.9
-4%
169 (21.9 - 590, n=643)
21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
147
167
-14%
152.1
-3%
172
-17%
203.3
-38%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
7h 44min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 16min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 54min
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 80.25 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 76 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 76 Wh
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, 46.74 Wh
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, 65 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-22%
-40%
-20%
-33%
-0%
Reader / Idle
464
298
-36%
315
-32%
339 (39 - 1174, n=629)
-27%
WiFi v1.3
316
230
-27%
190
-40%
224
-29%
212
-33%
254 (78 - 622, n=314)
-20%
Load
54
52
-4%
55
2%
78.9 (18 - 202, n=595)
46%

Pro

+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Baixo peso
+ Iluminação de fundo RGB
+ Bom painel IPS
+ Design luxuoso
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Alto desempenho
+ Extremamente plano
+ Marcos finos
+ SSD RAID
+ 144 Hz

Contra

- A base poderia ser mais estável
- Controle da ventoinha não ideal
- Manutenção limitada
- Som decepcionante
- Muito caro
In review: MSI GS65 8SG Stealth. Test unit provided by MSI Germany.
In review: MSI GS65 8SG Stealth. Test unit provided by MSI Germany.

 Com o GS75 8SG Stealth, a MSI lançou um portátil para jogos de grande sucesso com marcos finos.

A combinação de um Core i7-8750H e GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q lida sem esforço com todos os jogos atuais - pelo menos na resolução nativa Full HD. O conteúdo 3D rodou muito bem na tela de 144 Hz de rápida reação e rica em contraste, apesar da falta da tecnologia G-Sync da Nvidia.

Outra fortaleza do aparelho de 17 polegadas é sua boa mobilidade. Juntamente com o peso e a altura, a duração da bateria também consegue impressionar. As portas modernas, que incluem Thunderbolt 3, também são louváveis.

Não ficamos completamente satisfeitos com a carcaça. Embora a qualidade e o dos materiais sejam de alto nível, a estabilidade deixa algo a desejar. Para obter uma pontuação geral "muito boa", o fabricante também precisaria melhorar a qualidade do som e o controle do ventilador.

O preço exorbitante (~3.800 Euros (~$4.267) pelo modelo topo de linha) prejudicará a compra de alguns consumidores interessados. Na maioria das vezes, portáteis comparativamente rápidos com uma GPU RTX 2070 têm preços significativamente mais baixos.

MSI GS75 8SG Stealth - 03/27/2019 v6
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
72 / 98 → 74%
Teclado
79%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
66 / 81 → 81%
Peso
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Bateria
83%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
98%
Desempenho da aplicação
100%
Temperatura
78 / 95 → 82%
Ruído
66 / 90 → 73%
Audio
62%
Médio
78%
86%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GS75 8SG Stealth (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q)
Florian Glaser, 2019-03-31 (Update: 2019-04- 1)