Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG: Um portátil para jogos fino e potente com boa duração da bateria

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/01/2019

Gamer fino. O elegante MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG lida com todos os jogos modernos triplo A com facilidade graças ao processador Core i7-9750H e à GPU GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q. O dispositivo de 17,3 polegadas também tem boa duração de bateria, durando mais tempo entre as cargas do que até mesmo alguns portáteis de escritório.

MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG (GS75 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Análises do: 990 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, conexão de 256-bits, ForceWare 430.86, Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, dual-channel, dois slots SO-DIMM, um máximo de 64 GB.
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0), 2048 GB 
, Slots: 3x M.2 2280: 2x ocupados (NVMe/SATA), 1x free (SATA)., 1803 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conectores dedicados de 3,5 mm para fones e microfone, Card Reader: MicroSD
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.9 x 396 x 259
Bateria
80.25 Wh, 5380 mAh Lítio-Ion, 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: SteelSeries, RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 230 W, Dragon Center, Norton Security trial, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.28 kg, Suprimento de energia: 724 g
Preço
3440 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg410 mm 292.5 mm 23 mm 2.6 kg404 mm 295.8 mm 25 mm 3.2 kg396 mm 261 mm 27.5 mm 2.5 kg399 mm 272 mm 19 mm 2.6 kg396 mm 259 mm 18.9 mm 2.3 kg
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
682 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Alienware m17 P37E
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
670 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Dell G7 17 7790
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
653 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=266)
604 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
599 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell G7 17 7790
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
678 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s ∼99% +1%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
668 MBit/s ∼99%
Alienware m17 P37E
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
659 MBit/s ∼97% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 MBit/s ∼95% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
605 MBit/s ∼89% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 749, n=266)
559 MBit/s ∼82% -16%
336
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 366 cd/m² Médio: 343.2 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 366 cd/m²
Contraste: 1262:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.51 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 0.71
ΔE Greyscale 1.93 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
94% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080
Schenker XMG Neo 17
BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080
Dell G7 17 7790
AU Optronics AUO409D, B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080
Alienware m17 P37E
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 3840x2160
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-92%
-80%
-287%
2%
-73%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
18.8 (9.6, 9.2)
-161%
17.2 (7.6, 9.6)
-139%
35.6 (19.6, 16)
-394%
7.2 (3.6, 3.6)
-0%
15.6 (8, 7.6)
-117%
Response Time Black / White *
10 (5.2, 4.8)
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-20%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-20%
28 (16, 12)
-180%
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
4%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-28%
PWM Frequency
25510 (17)
971 (99)
-96%
Screen
-32%
-77%
-135%
-30%
-104%
Brightness middle
366
304
-17%
308.6
-16%
357.9
-2%
288
-21%
299.1
-18%
Brightness
343
289
-16%
299
-13%
347
1%
287
-16%
273
-20%
Brightness Distribution
91
90
-1%
92
1%
94
3%
91
0%
81
-11%
Black Level *
0.29
0.26
10%
0.29
-0%
0.33
-14%
0.2
31%
0.27
7%
Contrast
1262
1169
-7%
1064
-16%
1085
-14%
1440
14%
1108
-12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.51
2.65
-75%
4.26
-182%
6.57
-335%
2.33
-54%
5.07
-236%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.22
6.11
-90%
7.83
-143%
9.86
-206%
5.34
-66%
10.55
-228%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.71
1.5
-111%
2.93
-313%
6.74
-849%
2.47
-248%
3.31
-366%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.93
2.75
-42%
5
-159%
4.3
-123%
1.19
38%
6.8
-252%
Gamma
2.38 92%
2.46 89%
2.07 106%
2.6 85%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
CCT
6881 94%
6763 96%
7488 87%
6403 102%
6710 97%
7805 83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60
0%
57.8
-4%
88.4
47%
57
-5%
58.5
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
92
-2%
89.2
-5%
100
6%
88
-6%
89.9
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-62% / -45%
-79% / -78%
-211% / -158%
-14% / -25%
-89% / -99%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.8 ms rise
↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 25510 Hz ≤ 17 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 25510 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 25510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9418 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Intel XTU
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240Tooltip
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1133 (1114.27-1233.11)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø969 (904.79-1042.12)
Dell G7 17 7790 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1081 (1056.8-1189.87)
Alienware m17 P37E Intel Core i9-8950HK, Intel Core i9-8950HK: Ø1206 (1178.9-1238.2)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1112 (1090.93-1218.55)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1139 (1122.59-1232.82)
CPU clock speeds during a CB R15 Multi 64Bit loop
CPU clock speeds during a CB R15 Multi 64Bit loop
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8413
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
36041
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6732
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
112.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1233 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
180 Points
Ajuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Alienware m17 P37E
Intel Core i9-8950HK
191 Points ∼100% +6%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points ∼94%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼91% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼89% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points ∼87% -7%
Dell G7 17 7790
Intel Core i7-8750H
164 Points ∼86% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=512)
156 Points ∼82% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware m17 P37E
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1238 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
1233 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
1233 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1218 Points ∼98% -1%
Dell G7 17 7790
Intel Core i7-8750H
1183 Points ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
1042 Points ∼84% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=515)
823 Points ∼66% -33%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
6732 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.85 - 8872, n=426)
4838 Points ∼72% -28%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
36041 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.7 - 48808, n=426)
18295 Points ∼51% -49%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
434 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 509, n=40)
428 Points ∼99% -1%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
2723 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1472 - 4926, n=40)
2460 Points ∼90% -10%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
23587 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (9307 - 27774, n=76)
16127 Points ∼68% -32%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
4298 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (2926 - 4825, n=76)
3698 Points ∼86% -14%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
25043 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (4116 - 32070, n=56)
18607 Points ∼74% -26%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
5266 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (2131 - 6030, n=56)
4784 Points ∼91% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (753 - 7545, n=189)
1208 ms * ∼100% -13%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1098.8 ms * ∼91% -3%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
1070.8 ms * ∼89%
Octane V2 - Total Score
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
35964 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
35446 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (12288 - 49518, n=185)
33436 Points ∼93% -7%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
263.33 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
252.13 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (51.6 - 333, n=188)
250 Points ∼95% -5%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
6948 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4461 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4193 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5716 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6053 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
5804 Points ∼96%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
5632 Points ∼93% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5596 Points ∼92% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5411 Points ∼89% -7%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
5279 Points ∼87% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=208)
5220 Points ∼86% -10%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5882 Points ∼100% +3%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
5716 Points ∼97%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
5315 Points ∼90% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=390)
5036 Points ∼86% -12%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
4765 Points ∼81% -17%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5107 Points ∼100% +14%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
4461 Points ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=407)
4262 Points ∼83% -4%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
4010 Points ∼79% -10%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
3812 Points ∼75% -15%
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
Sequential Read: 2689 MB/s
Sequential Write: 2846 MB/s
512K Read: 1487 MB/s
512K Write: 2637 MB/s
4K Read: 53.49 MB/s
4K Write: 103.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 590.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 532.3 MB/s
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Dell G7 17 7790
Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
Alienware m17 P37E
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-21%
-56%
-17%
-27%
-18%
Write 4K
95.46
92.74
-3%
78.58
-18%
120.2
26%
92.39
-3%
99.77
5%
Read 4K
42.59
41.4
-3%
31.89
-25%
44.3
4%
39.59
-7%
40.81
-4%
Write Seq
2851
1363
-52%
230.4
-92%
1278
-55%
1221
-57%
1385
-51%
Read Seq
2696
1259
-53%
924.7
-66%
1389
-48%
1005
-63%
2089
-23%
Write 4K Q32T1
402.6
289.7
-28%
159.1
-60%
436.2
8%
292.5
-27%
380
-6%
Read 4K Q32T1
443.9
337.5
-24%
315.6
-29%
515.3
16%
330.8
-25%
445.5
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
3420
3332
-3%
230.7
-93%
1157
-66%
2385
-30%
1380
-60%
Read Seq Q32T1
3514
3477
-1%
1323
-62%
2671
-24%
3339
-5%
3471
-1%
3DMark 06 Standard
37968 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
21390 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34168 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17182 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
7518 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8512 Points ∼100% +7%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7923 Points ∼93%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7446 Points ∼87% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7202 Points ∼85% -9%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6695 Points ∼79% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=151)
5719 Points ∼67% -28%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
21515 Points ∼100% +7%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
20323 Points ∼94% +1%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
20119 Points ∼94%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
19800 Points ∼92% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18520 Points ∼86% -8%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17466 Points ∼81% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=539)
11351 Points ∼53% -44%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29453 Points ∼100% +8%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points ∼95% +3%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
27204 Points ∼92%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
25765 Points ∼87% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
25248 Points ∼86% -7%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22523 Points ∼76% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=614)
13391 Points ∼45% -51%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
81.7 (min: 68) fps ∼100% +6%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
76.9 fps ∼94%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8950HK
75.7 fps ∼93% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
73.1 fps ∼89% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
73 fps ∼89% -5%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
64.7 fps ∼79% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=310)
49.5 fps ∼61% -36%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8950HK
164.7 fps ∼100% +1%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
163.7 fps ∼99%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
161.5 fps ∼98% -1%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
133.6 fps ∼81% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=339)
97.4 fps ∼59% -41%
Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
85 fps ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
82 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 108, n=31)
68.5 fps ∼81% -19%
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
92 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (8 - 141, n=123)
56.3 fps ∼61% -39%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø76 (52-82)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB; The Witcher 3: Ø73.8 (65-79)
Dell G7 17 7790 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G; The Witcher 3: Ø60.8 (54-65)
Alienware m17 P37E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG); The Witcher 3: Ø73.4 (67-80)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; The Witcher 3: Ø80.8 (71-85)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; The Witcher 3: Ø69.7 (63-76)
GPU information while playing The Witcher 3
GPU information while playing The Witcher 3
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 331.1289.6263.6163.7fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 286.3217.213576.9fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 17216113492fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 82.580.781.3fps
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 160.987.963.543.9fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 127.4100.774fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 1231099995fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 116989485fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 98.593.977.741.2fps
Rage 2 (2019) 206.6112.296.193.3fps

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 32 / 38 dB
Carga
47 / 49 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Schenker XMG Neo 17
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Dell G7 17 7790
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Alienware m17 P37E
8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
4%
10%
4%
2%
10%
off / environment *
30
29
3%
28.2
6%
28.2
6%
29
3%
28.3
6%
Idle Minimum *
31
29
6%
28.6
8%
28.2
9%
29
6%
31.5
-2%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
28.6
11%
28.2
12%
32
-0%
31.6
1%
Idle Maximum *
38
33
13%
28.6
25%
31
18%
33
13%
31.6
17%
Load Average *
47
42
11%
31.8
32%
50.8
-8%
47
-0%
32.3
31%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
49
-2%
50.6
-5%
50.8
-6%
49
-2%
43
10%
Load Maximum *
49
49
-0%
50.8
-4%
50.8
-4%
51
-4%
45.5
7%

* ... smaller is better

 53 °C55 °C54 °C 
 46 °C51 °C49 °C 
 42 °C45 °C44 °C 
Máximo: 55 °C
Médio: 48.8 °C
62 °C65 °C53 °C
57 °C61 °C49 °C
45 °C45 °C43 °C
Máximo: 65 °C
Médio: 53.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  50 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 65 °C / 149 F, compared to the average of 42.2 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-16.2 °C / -29.2 F).
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Schenker XMG Neo 17
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Dell G7 17 7790
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Alienware m17 P37E
8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
11%
1%
2%
11%
13%
Maximum Upper Side *
55
47
15%
46.6
15%
55
-0%
53
4%
38.6
30%
Maximum Bottom *
65
56
14%
57
12%
60
8%
50
23%
43.6
33%
Idle Upper Side *
30
28
7%
34.4
-15%
30.4
-1%
27
10%
30.2
-1%
Idle Bottom *
32
30
6%
34.6
-8%
31.8
1%
30
6%
35
-9%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.938.82539.843.63133.732.44034.735.1502931.96328.335.18027.930.410024.627.712524.733.316028.233.52002437.725021.745.731520.247.540020.253.250019.155.46301866.28001774.7100017.473.3125019.169.8160017.466200017.168.7250017.265.4315017.566.8400017.367.3500017.570.3630017.168.2800017.269.91000017.468.61250017.362.71600017.452.3SPL30.181.1N1.448.9median 17.5median 66Delta1.710.640.744.538.440.538.738.838.740.53742.135.443.434.946.734.253.33457.132.461.83265.93269.131.47130.366.329.571.729.382.929.285.329.280.428.976.528.580.728.886.628.583.128.377.628.174.928.275.328.171.72874.92880.927.679.627.775.240.892.9497.9median 28.9median 75.21.96.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GS75 Stealth 9SGMSI GE75 9SG
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GE75 9SG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 1.8 / 2.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 13 / 17 / 25 Watt
Carga midlight 96 / 239 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Schenker XMG Neo 17
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Dell G7 17 7790
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Alienware m17 P37E
8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
5%
10%
-36%
-16%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
13
13
-0%
9.5
27%
21.2
-63%
19
-46%
20.2
-55%
Idle Average *
17
16
6%
16.2
5%
29.6
-74%
22
-29%
27.2
-60%
Idle Maximum *
25
21
16%
23.8
5%
34
-36%
30
-20%
28.7
-15%
Load Average *
96
96
-0%
101.7
-6%
130.9
-36%
104
-8%
90.8
5%
Load Maximum *
239
191
20%
172.2
28%
219.7
8%
203
15%
165.4
31%
Witcher 3 ultra *
156
172
-10%
155
1%
177.5
-14%
167
-7%
152.1
2%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
7h 41min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44)
5h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 14min
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh
Schenker XMG Neo 17
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 46.74 Wh
Dell G7 17 7790
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 60 Wh
Alienware m17 P37E
8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 90 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-32%
13%
-11%
-34%
-47%
-28%
Reader / Idle
461
315
-32%
511
11%
543
18%
298
-35%
H.264
410
WiFi v1.3
357
224
-37%
236
-34%
296
-17%
230
-36%
190
-47%
256 (78 - 622, n=357)
-28%
Load
74
55
-26%
119
61%
49
-34%
52
-30%

Pro

+ Elegante
+ Comparativamente leve
+ Fino
+ Marcos finos
+ Excelente desempenho
+ Tela brilhante
+ Alta relação de contraste
+ Painel de 144 Hz
+ Iluminação RGB
+ 2 SSDs NVMe em RAID 0
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- A carcaça poderia ser mais rígida
- Opções de manutenção e de reparação limitadas
- Alto-falantes decepcionantes
- Caro
The MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG laptop review. Test device courtesy of MSI Germany.
The MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG laptop review. Test device courtesy of MSI Germany.

O MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG é um elegante portátil para jogos de 17,3 polegadas que oferece um grande impacto. Infelizmente, embora o dispositivo pareça elegante para os padrões de jogos, ele pode ser mais robusto. Esperamos que a MSI aborde isso com modelos subsequentes reforçando ou atualizando o chassi.

Internamente, as coisas se moldam muito bem, com o Core i7-9750H e a GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q combinados para oferecer excelente desempenho em jogos. Esses componentes permitem que o 9SG tire proveito de sua tela de 144 Hz, com a maioria dos títulos triple-A modernos em média em torno de 90 FPS, mesmo com configurações gráficas máximas. A tela tem ganha uma pontuação alta por causa de seus ângulos de visão estáveis, alto brilho, boa relação de contraste, tempos de resposta curtos e reprodução de cores precisa.

O MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG é um poderoso portátil para jogos que deve deixar a maioria dos jogadores felizes. No entanto, sua carcaça frágil e alto preço de varejo são razões para procurar outras opções.

Também gostamos que a MSI tenha incluído dois SSDs NVMe em RAID-0. A decisão dá ao 9SG velocidades de transferência comparativamente boas e um bom armazenamento de 2 TB. Você pode até mesmo adicionar uma terceira unidade M.2 2280 caso precise de mais espaço, embora, infelizmente, a MSI tenha optado por um conector SATA III mais lento em vez de NVMe.

O 9SG também tem uma duração de bateria relativamente boa graças à sua bateria de 80,25 Wh e deve durar um dia inteiro entre as cargas. A carcaça frágil também ajuda a manter o peso baixo, com o 9SG pesando apenas 2,28 kg (~5lb). Incluindo o Thunderbolt 3 foi uma medida sensata, e embora deva haver portas suficientes para a maioria das pessoas, a MSI tinha espaço para adicionar mais algumas. No geral, o MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG é uma boa opção para aqueles que estão no mercado por um portátil móvel de 17,3 polegadas. Se você pode ignorar as deficiências com seu design, o 9SG o recompensará com um desempenho de ponta em um lindo painel de 144 Hz.

MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG - 09/20/2019 v7
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
71 / 98 → 73%
Teclado
79%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
63 / 80 → 79%
Peso
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Bateria
69 / 95 → 72%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
93%
Desempenho da aplicação
91%
Temperatura
69 / 95 → 73%
Ruído
71 / 90 → 79%
Audio
73%
Médio
75%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG: Um portátil para jogos fino e potente com boa duração da bateria
Sascha Mölck, 2019-07- 1 (Update: 2019-07- 2)