Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Tongfang GK5CQ7Z): Um portátil de jogos com marcos finos

A Clevo alternative. Quando se trata de portáteis de gama alta configuráveis, o fabricante de barebone Clevo é o principal fabricante da indústria há muito tempo. O Tongfang vem desafiando seu domínio há um tempo, então levamos o chassi do GK5CQ7Z mais uma vez para ver como ele se sai. Continue lendo para descobrir como o XMG Neo 15, com seu processador Intel de 9ª geração e GPU da série RTX 20, se desempenha em nossos testes.
Coffee Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 (XMG Neo 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 885 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 441.12, Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel. Todos os slots ocupados, máximo de 64 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001, 1024 GB 
, NVMe, duas baias M.2-2280
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conectores dedicados para fones e microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 22 x 359 x 243
Bateria
62 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: RGB, mecânico, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 230 W, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.056 kg, Suprimento de energia: 690 g
Preço
2268 EUR
Links
SCHENKER página inicial
SCHENKER Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82.8 %
12/2019
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.1 kg22 mm15.60"1920x1080
84 %
08/2019
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.1 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080
84 %
05/2019
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.1 kg19 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.3 %
09/2019
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.4 kg19.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.8 %
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.3 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080

Size Comparison

❌
362 mm 265 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg362.2 mm 261.6 mm 19.8 mm 2.4 kg359 mm 243 mm 22 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (26 - 269, n=93, last 2 years)
122.3 MB/s +44%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1140 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=5, last 2 years)
1135 MBit/s 0%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=5, last 2 years)
1369 MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1360 MBit/s
307
cd/m²		302
cd/m²		300
cd/m²
284
cd/m²		313
cd/m²		279
cd/m²
281
cd/m²		307
cd/m²		280
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 313 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 294.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 313 cd/m²
Contraste: 1043:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.77
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.51
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080		Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
BOE NV156FHM-N4J, IPS, 1920x1080
Display
2%
3%
3%
3%
Display P3 Coverage
64
64.6
1%
65.3
2%
66.2
3%
67.7
6%
sRGB Coverage
90.3
92.6
3%
95.5
6%
92.3
2%
91.6
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.4
66
1%
66.5
2%
67.2
3%
67.1
3%
Response Times
27%
-26%
-24%
-41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9.6 ?(4.8, 4.8)
5.2 ?(2.6, 2.6)
46%
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
-58%
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
-58%
19 ?(9, 10)
-98%
Response Time Black / White *
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
7%
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
7%
10.8 ?(6, 4.8)
10%
10 ?(6, 4)
17%
PWM Frequency
23580 ?(24)
Screen
4%
1%
-18%
19%
Brightness middle
313
288
-8%
266
-15%
324.8
4%
477
52%
Brightness
295
265
-10%
248
-16%
316
7%
431
46%
Brightness Distribution
89
84
-6%
89
0%
84
-6%
84
-6%
Black Level *
0.3
0.22
27%
0.31
-3%
0.26
13%
0.175
42%
Contrast
1043
1309
26%
858
-18%
1249
20%
2726
161%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.33
3.22
3%
2.78
17%
4.96
-49%
4.17
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.25
6.26
-0%
5.96
5%
8.95
-43%
6.97
-12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.77
1.5
15%
0.91
49%
3.23
-82%
2.51
-42%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.1
3.43
-11%
3.58
-15%
5
-61%
3.49
-13%
Gamma
2.51 88%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.21 100%
2.5 88%
CCT
6930 94%
7290 89%
7186 90%
7742 84%
7076 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
60
2%
62
5%
59.8
1%
60
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
93
3%
96
7%
91.8
2%
91
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
11% / 6%
-7% / -2%
-13% / -15%
-6% / 8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701235Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1002 (974.71-1181)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø968 (959.49-1081.9)
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1132 (1125.75-1244.28)
Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
697 Points +61%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
457 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
448 Points +3%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
442 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
434 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points -1%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7383 Points +210%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
2694 Points +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
2448 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2427 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
2384 Points
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
2298 Points -4%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points +40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
192 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
183 Points -5%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
181 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3074 Points +160%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1181 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points -6%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
1057 Points -10%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
192 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1181 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7573 Points +37%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
5991 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
5938 Points +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5746 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
5522 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G		Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
22%
22%
27%
-32%
Write 4K
108.7
108.8
0%
115.5
6%
137.4
26%
134.2
23%
Read 4K
41.4
40.31
-3%
58
40%
41.37
0%
37.72
-9%
Write Seq
1083
2488
130%
1555
44%
2500
131%
389.2
-64%
Read Seq
917
1916
109%
2590
182%
1576
72%
1030
12%
Write 4K Q32T1
468.5
382.4
-18%
369.3
-21%
446.7
-5%
238.9
-49%
Read 4K Q32T1
530
421.8
-20%
441.7
-17%
522
-2%
343.9
-35%
Write Seq Q32T1
3057
2542
-17%
1547
-49%
2796
-9%
789
-74%
Read Seq Q32T1
3422
3320
-3%
2969
-13%
3415
0%
1502
-56%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3422 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3057 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 530 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 468.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 917 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1083 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 108.7 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
18275 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34619 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15226 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6358 pontos
Ajuda
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001: Ø60.8 (55-68)
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3921 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3738 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3721 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3719 Points -1%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3717 Points -1%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18060 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17419 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17335 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16968 Points -3%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16483 Points -5%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6831 Points +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6748 Points +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6716 Points +5%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6419 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6387 Points
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22749 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22005 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21959 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21861 Points
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18434 Points -16%
The Witcher 3 | Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 | GRID 2019 | Ghost Recon Breakpoint | FIFA 20 | Borderlands 3 | Control | Apex Legends | Rage 2
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)
116.1 fps +92%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
72.6 (59min) fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
60.4 (49min) fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
100.8 (78min) fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
83.2 (65min) fps
GRID 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
79.4 (63min) fps +22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
65.1 (54min) fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
66 (31min) fps +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
57 (30min) fps
FIFA 20 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
210 (164min) fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
195 (149min) fps
Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
Average of class Gaming
  (22.4 - 179.7, n=16, last 2 years)
102.2 fps +93%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
63.3 fps +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
53 fps
Control - 1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11)
Average of class Gaming
  (83.5 - 187, n=6, last 2 years)
147.4 fps +149%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
71.2 (63min) fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
59.3 (52min) fps
Apex Legends - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:TS AF:16x
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
143 (139min) fps +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
123 (114min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (last 2 years)
92.4 fps -25%
Rage 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Off)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
98.1 (90min) fps +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
83.2 (76min) fps
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 113 60.4
Apex Legends (2019) 124 123
Rage 2 (2019) 85.5 83.2
F1 2019 (2019) 147 105
Control (2019) 59.3
Borderlands 3 (2019) 69.3 53
FIFA 20 (2019) 203 195
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 78 57
GRID 2019 (2019) 107 65.1
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 96.9 83.2
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 91.8 84.4
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.839.637.235.732.937.7254445.244.644.842.346.83133.337.736.43534.235.24031.336.736.533.434.234.45039.839.440.83937.533.46334.234.133.430.632.331.88032.533.932.433.930.848.810029.932.232.732.131.433.612530.93331.930.129.232.316034.435.936.735.134.333.520035.628.728.92826.630.825032.627.831.227.726.232.431532.126.927.924.822.834.340030.925.826.121.219.836.150031.92625.420.519.437.36303225.423.620.721.636.280033.725.221.818.417.338.6100034.726.222.718.417.240.6125035.726.623.618.918.841.5160037.828.922.818.318.143.9200038.726.521.61816.844.625003724.120.418.41743.5315035.32319.417.816.944400035.822.419.117.716.744.1500032.120.21817.717.240.9630029.618.517.817.516.939.5800025.21817.717.816.935.21000022.91817.817.71733.41250019.71817.717.518.428.21600018.517.717.717.516.922.6SPL473734.531.730.953.9N5.72.82.31.71.69.3median 32.1median 25.8median 22.7median 18.4median 18.1median 36.2Delta4.33.753.43.14.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 34 / 37 dB
Carga
47 / 54 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
2%
-1%
7%
9%
14%
off / environment *
31
30
3%
30
3%
29
6%
30
3%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=183, last 2 years)
22%
Idle Minimum *
31
30
3%
31
-0%
30.5
2%
31.3
-1%
25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=184, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
34
-0%
31.5
7%
31.3
8%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=184, last 2 years)
19%
Idle Maximum *
37
39
-5%
39
-5%
31.5
15%
31.3
15%
30.8 ?(21.9 - 47, n=184, last 2 years)
17%
Load Average *
47
45
4%
46
2%
40.6
14%
42
11%
43 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=184, last 2 years)
9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
49
2%
53
-6%
49.5
1%
42.1
16%
Load Maximum *
54
51
6%
55
-2%
53.4
1%
46.5
14%
53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=184, last 2 years)
1%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 58 °C60 °C49 °C 
 42 °C47 °C41 °C 
 36 °C40 °C40 °C 
Máximo: 60 °C
Médio: 45.9 °C
66 °C66 °C56 °C
65 °C65 °C45 °C
37 °C37 °C32 °C
Máximo: 66 °C
Médio: 52.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-14.1 °C / -25.4 F).
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
11%
2%
-11%
-1%
10%
Maximum Upper Side *
60
49
18%
58
3%
48.8
19%
43.9
27%
46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=183, last 2 years)
23%
Maximum Bottom *
66
59
11%
64
3%
55
17%
47.6
28%
49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=183, last 2 years)
25%
Idle Upper Side *
30
28
7%
30
-0%
41
-37%
38.6
-29%
31.4 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=183, last 2 years)
-5%
Idle Bottom *
32
29
9%
31
3%
45.6
-43%
40.8
-28%
32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=183, last 2 years)
-2%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.9342542.338.93134.2324034.2365037.539.76332.334.28030.832.610031.429.512529.231.816034.33320026.632.425026.246.331522.856.640019.862.450019.460.263021.665.980017.376.1100017.273.6125018.866.4160018.165.7200016.866.425001765.3315016.968.2400016.766.5500017.267.5630016.971.5800016.968.4100001767.41250018.464.51600016.959.5SPL30.981.1N1.650median 18.1median 65.7Delta3.17.531.734.233.7373032.936.637.134.23527.634.32833.424.63823.847.123.952.821.550.722.160.321.664.420.56719.5621868.217.970.518.369.720.869.618.769.717.469.917.769.317.668.517.267.417.464.117.363.217.364.417.162.217.258.517.254.430.5801.448.9median 18median 64.41.87.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.9 / 2.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 11 / 15 / 21 Watt
Carga midlight 94 / 173 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
10%
-38%
-144%
-38%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
11
7
36%
21
-91%
46
-318%
22.2
-102%
13.7 ?(2 - 64, n=178, last 2 years)
-25%
Idle Average *
15
12
20%
23
-53%
59
-293%
24.9
-66%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=178, last 2 years)
-27%
Idle Maximum *
21
22
-5%
32
-52%
65.5
-212%
30.6
-46%
26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=178, last 2 years)
-28%
Load Average *
94
86
9%
97
-3%
99.8
-6%
101
-7%
110.9 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years)
-18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
143
144
-1%
148
-3%
154.1
-8%
143
-0%
Load Maximum *
173
177
-2%
213
-23%
222.7
-29%
186
-8%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years)
-45%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
7h 19min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 40min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 19min
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q,  Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
38%
59%
-37%
-47%
13%
Reader / Idle
439
666
52%
545
24%
221
-50%
544 ?(57 - 1290, n=84, last 2 years)
24%
WiFi v1.3
340
478
41%
421
24%
129
-62%
179
-47%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years)
8%
Load
79
96
22%
181
129%
80
1%
84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years)
7%
H.264
408
399 ?(56 - 747, n=91, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Compacto
+ Leve
+ Robusto
+ Teclado mecânico
+ Iluminação de fundo RGB
+ Painel de 144 Hz
+ Marcos finos da tela
+ Individualmente configurável

Contra

- Altas temperaturas da superfície
- Ventiladores barulhentos sob uso intenso contínuo
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Alto-falantes abaixo do esperado

Verdict - A laptop that should appeal to almost every gamer

Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 laptop review. Test device courtesy of bestware.com
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 laptop review. Test device courtesy of bestware.com

No geral, o Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 é um bom portátil para jogos, além de suas altas temperaturas de superfície e ventiladores barulhentos durante os jogos. Nossa unidade de teste oferece um hardware poderoso, porém balanceado, que deve agradar a maioria dos jogadores.

A combinação do Core i7-9750H e da RTX 2070 Max-Q permite que o dispositivo rode todos os jogos modernos sem problemas em sua tela de 144 Hz. Da mesma forma, o chassi de metal compacto e o teclado mecânico do Neo 15 com luz de fundo RGB são outras razões para considerá-lo como seu próximo portátil para jogos. A capacidade de configurar o dispositivo individualmente também é um bônus.

Teria sido bom se a Schenker incluísse uma porta Thunderbolt 3 e alto-falantes melhores. No entanto, esses não devem ser motivos para criticar o XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19, pois se destaca em outras áreas.

SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 - 05/14/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
82 / 98 → 84%
Teclado
89%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
61 / 80 → 77%
Peso
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Bateria
67 / 95 → 71%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
89%
Desempenho da aplicação
91%
Temperatura
68 / 95 → 72%
Ruído
65 / 90 → 72%
Audio
74%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Médio
74%
83%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Tongfang GK5CQ7Z): Um portátil de jogos com marcos finos
Florian Glaser, 2019-12- 2 (Update: 2019-12- 4)