Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Clevo PB51RF-G): Diversão e jogos

O lobo em pele de cordeiro. O XMG Pro 15 pode não parecer particularmente emocionante à primeira vista, mas oferece muito poder. A Schenker Technologies combinou um processador de seis núcleos com uma GeForce RTX 2070 que garante taxas de atualização muito fluentes, mesmo ao jogar jogos modernos. Descubra outros pontos fortes e fracos do portátil de 15 polegadas em nossa análise detalhada.
Coffee Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1215 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 442.19, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual Channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB 
, Slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2,5 polegadas
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 microfone, 1 fone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30 x 359 x 258
Bateria
62 Wh, 5500 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 230 Watts, Memória USB, manual do usuário, pano de limpeza, DVD de controladores, acessório de 2,5 polegadas, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.53 kg, Suprimento de energia: 680 g
Preço
2104 EUR
Links
SCHENKER página inicial
SCHENKER Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.3 %
03/2020
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.5 kg30 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.1 %
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.4 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.3 %
05/2019
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.1 kg19 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.7 %
12/2019
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.3 kg26.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
87 %
03/2019
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		3.5 kg38 mm15.60"1920x1080

Size Comparison

❌
386 mm 262 mm 38 mm 3.5 kg359 mm 258 mm 30 mm 2.5 kg360 mm 275 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 26.9 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s -52%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.9 MB/s -87%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
224 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s -46%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.8 MB/s -87%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1390 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s -18%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s -51%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
654 MBit/s -53%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
580 (497min - 619max) MBit/s -58%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1330 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
693 MBit/s -48%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s -49%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 (541min - 677max) MBit/s -52%
ColorChecker
22.1 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
21 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
19 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Pro 15: 18.43 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 29.9 ∆E
Test chart Schenker XMG Pro 15
Test chart Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
357
cd/m²		352
cd/m²		335
cd/m²
331
cd/m²		346
cd/m²		324
cd/m²
365
cd/m²		366
cd/m²		336
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 366 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 345.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 346 cd/m²
Contraste: 1236:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.58
ΔE Greyscale 4.95 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
0%
-3%
4%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
66.7
66.2
-1%
64.9
-3%
69.3
4%
66.1
-1%
sRGB Coverage
94.4
97.1
3%
91
-4%
98.9
5%
92.6
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
68.1
67.6
-1%
65.9
-3%
70.7
4%
67.1
-1%
Response Times
17%
40%
12%
-8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.2 ?(8, 9.2)
15 ?(8, 7)
13%
7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)
58%
13.2 ?(7.2, 6)
23%
17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4)
-2%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
9 ?(5, 4)
20%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
21%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-0%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-14%
PWM Frequency
250 ?(20)
23150 ?(19)
Screen
-7%
0%
9%
1%
Brightness middle
346
309
-11%
286
-17%
277.4
-20%
263
-24%
Brightness
346
284
-18%
275
-21%
264
-24%
264
-24%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
90
1%
90
1%
89
0%
Black Level *
0.28
0.42
-50%
0.37
-32%
0.24
14%
0.17
39%
Contrast
1236
736
-40%
773
-37%
1156
-6%
1547
25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.62
3.99
14%
2.19
53%
1.51
67%
4.45
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.93
8.3
7%
4.4
51%
4.93
45%
8.33
7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.58
1.12
29%
2.27
-44%
1.77
-12%
1.93
-22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.95
5.43
-10%
2.2
56%
3.7
25%
4.77
4%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.57 86%
2.41 91%
2.23 99%
2.52 87%
CCT
7733 84%
7767 84%
6405 101%
7061 92%
7767 84%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
63
3%
59
-3%
65.1
7%
60
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
97
3%
91
-3%
99.1
5%
93
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / -3%
12% / 5%
8% / 9%
-3% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701235Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1023 (1010.13-1155.97)
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1177 (1160.19-1270.77)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)
268 Points +54%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points +17%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
198 Points +14%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H
178 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)
3101 Points +168%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
1623 Points +40%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points +27%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1288 Points +11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1156 (1010.13min - 1155.97max) Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)
699 Points +66%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
474 Points +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
430 Points +2%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H
423 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
421 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)
7442 Points +209%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
3505 Points +45%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H
2753 Points +14%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
2507 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
2410 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1156 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
144 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)
7592 Points +51%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6868 Points +37%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6452 Points +29%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points +13%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5625 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5013 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)		MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-32%
-19%
-6%
-12%
Write 4K
120.6
133.3
11%
97
-20%
125.7
4%
129.9
8%
Read 4K
46.13
55.3
20%
49.58
7%
45.04
-2%
47.15
2%
Write Seq
2900
980
-66%
1838
-37%
2361
-19%
1840
-37%
Read Seq
2929
1406
-52%
2421
-17%
1987
-32%
1775
-39%
Write 4K Q32T1
372.2
286.3
-23%
326.9
-12%
407.1
9%
294.5
-21%
Read 4K Q32T1
422.2
331.5
-21%
372.9
-12%
537
27%
373.6
-12%
Write Seq Q32T1
3245
976
-70%
1894
-42%
2398
-26%
3295
2%
Read Seq Q32T1
3565
1520
-57%
2828
-21%
3309
-7%
3535
-1%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3565 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3245 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 422.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 372.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2929 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2900 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.13 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 120.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
20935 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
37846 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17762 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
7508 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)
29457 Points +42%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20997 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20762 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20759 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19846 Points -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19123 Points -8%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=155, last 2 years)
7720 Points +73%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4474 Points
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4467 Points 0%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4346 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4155 Points -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
3958 Points -12%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)
40487 Points +55%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
26975 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
26140 Points
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
25845 Points -1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
25500 Points -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
24267 Points -7%
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø75.8 (68-80)
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=227, last 2 years)
117.1 fps +57%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
78.4 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
74.4 (62min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K
73 (60min) fps -2%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
72 (61min - 84max) fps -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
70.2 (58min) fps -6%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 142 74.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 153 140 130 122
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 110 95.5 81.1
Anno 1800 (2019) 68.5 41.1
Rage 2 (2019) 103 100
FIFA 20 (2019) 190 189
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 89 67
GRID 2019 (2019) 104 75.4
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 113 92.9
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 83.5 78.1
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 92.2 90.7
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 66.8 42.4
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.534.933.734.936.32544.14440.739.539.83134.833.635.930.733.14039.536.135.233.337.35033.435.331.530.441.46339.734.530.827.941.28048.232.230.825.648.910033.730.527.426.636.212534.633.626.727.536.816037.632.627.425.139.220035.93124.823.637.425039.130.623.922.84031541.131.625.222.942.540041.828.521.919.842.850043.529.123.51944.663044.528.82117.44480042.927.9191842.6100044.829.219.117.844.7125045.529.81918.845.5160046.330.918.818.246.4200046.330.619.518.546250046.329.419.218.345.9315043.223.8191843.140004322.219.418.243.3500042.221.619.818.641.6630039.120.519.918.53980003420.320.118.8341000032.420.320.819.132.11250029.920.62119.4301600024.521.321.519.824.9SPL55.939.932.330.855.8N10.93.41.81.511median 41.8median 29.1median 20.8median 18.8median 42.5Delta5421.84hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Pro 15

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 32 / 40 dB
Carga
56 / 56 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
9%
2%
6%
-1%
17%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.8
4%
30
-0%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=183, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Minimum *
30
30.6
-2%
31
-3%
33
-10%
32
-7%
25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=185, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Average *
32
30.6
4%
33
-3%
33
-3%
33
-3%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=185, last 2 years)
14%
Idle Maximum *
40
37.7
6%
38
5%
33.1
17%
36
10%
30.7 ?(21.9 - 47, n=185, last 2 years)
23%
Load Average *
56
36.5
35%
50
11%
38
32%
55
2%
43.1 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55
52.1
5%
53
4%
52.9
4%
57
-4%
Load Maximum *
56
48.1
14%
56
-0%
57.8
-3%
59
-5%
53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=185, last 2 years)
5%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 42 °C42 °C43 °C 
 39 °C41 °C42 °C 
 29 °C30 °C30 °C 
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 37.6 °C
41 °C42 °C42 °C
43 °C41 °C39 °C
33 °C31 °C31 °C
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 38.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  50 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-14%
-16%
-17%
-5%
-10%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
45.6
-6%
54
-26%
45
-5%
45
-5%
46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=183, last 2 years)
-7%
Maximum Bottom *
43
55.5
-29%
47
-9%
53
-23%
48
-12%
49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=183, last 2 years)
-15%
Idle Upper Side *
29
31.8
-10%
33
-14%
31.2
-8%
30
-3%
31.4 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=183, last 2 years)
-8%
Idle Bottom *
30
33.3
-11%
34
-13%
39
-30%
30
-0%
32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=183, last 2 years)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.933.62539.542.33130.733.34033.335.85030.431.36327.932.88025.631.210026.629.812527.531.716025.130.520023.635.125022.850.531522.960.740019.870.75001969.363017.468.38001874.7100017.877.1125018.874.5160018.274.5200018.576.4250018.376.731501874.2400018.268.3500018.671.8630018.570.1800018.8711000019.170.21250019.467.51600019.861.9SPL30.885.7N1.564.9median 18.8median 70.1Delta1.810.243.544.238.639.731.232.235.237.428.428.826.329.125.830.326.736.524.237.422.750.525.658.326.361.721.763.72061.518.859.91858.918.261.817.96419.164.718.162.917.265.517.767.417.767.617.565.517.76517.665.817.563.817.56117.35817.349.330.576.81.440.8median 18median 61.81.54.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Pro 15SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 1.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 15 / 19 / 26 Watt
Carga midlight 101 / 245 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
13%
-24%
1%
-61%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
15
11.4
24%
24
-60%
15
-0%
35
-133%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years)
8%
Idle Average *
19
13.5
29%
27
-42%
18.5
3%
39
-105%
19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years)
-1%
Idle Maximum *
26
21.6
17%
33
-27%
20.2
22%
47
-81%
27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years)
-4%
Load Average *
101
106
-5%
129
-28%
110.9
-10%
117
-16%
111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years)
-10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
177
186
-5%
176
1%
187.3
-6%
196
-11%
Load Maximum *
245
196
20%
216
12%
260
-6%
299
-22%
251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years)
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
5h 12min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 28min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 12min
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh		Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh		MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 51 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 82 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
60%
2%
-9%
-16%
56%
Reader / Idle
312
353
13%
371
19%
194
-38%
544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years)
74%
WiFi v1.3
208
333
60%
220
6%
216
4%
157
-25%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years)
77%
Load
72
62
-14%
35
-51%
83
15%
84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years)
17%
H.264
154
399 ?(56 - 747, n=92, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Configurações individuais
+ Temperaturas moderadas
+ G-Sync ou Optimus
+ Iluminação de fundo RGB
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Marcos finos
+ 144 Hz

Contra

- Ruído de sistema muito alto sob uso intenso
- O som poderia ser melhor
- Duração curta da bateria
In review: Schenker XMG Pro 15. Test unit provided by bestware.com
In review: Schenker XMG Pro 15. Test unit provided by bestware.com

O XMG Pro 15 se encaixa perfeitamente no espaço entre o Gamai fina e leve e o Substitutos de desktop clássico. Os usuários que preferem uma carcaça compacta, mas não querem renunciar ao alto desempenho, chegaram ao lugar certo.

O Core i7-8750H e GeForce GTX 2070 podem exibir todos os títulos atuais com todos os detalhes e são os companheiros ideais para jogadores hardcore. Nossa unidade de teste também oferece luz de fundo RGB complementar para teclado, muitas opções de atualização e configuração e uma ampla gama de portas disponíveis, incluindo Thunderbolt 3. A tela responsiva e de alto contraste de 144 Hz é outro ótimo recurso. 

Infelizmente, os ventiladores de refrigeração comprometem o excelente conceito. O fato de que os ventiladores às vezes se ativam aparentemente sem motivo e que a operação 3D geralmente é muito barulhenta é algo que frequentemente observamos com os barebones Clevo. A fraca duração da bateria também afetou nossa classificação geral.

SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 - 02/19/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
74 / 98 → 76%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
73 / 80 → 92%
Peso
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Bateria
55 / 95 → 57%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
93%
Desempenho da aplicação
91%
Temperatura
89 / 95 → 93%
Ruído
56 / 90 → 62%
Audio
75%
Camera
38 / 85 → 45%
Médio
73%
83%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (XMG Pro 15 Serie)
Análise
•
Análise do laptop para jogos S...
|
Análise
•
Revisão do laptop Schenker XMG...
|
Análise
•
Revisão do Schenker XMG Pro 15...
|
Análise
•
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Clevo PC5...
|
Notícias
•
Sensível ou não? Estojo ultraf...

Pricecompare

Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Clevo PB51RF-G): Diversão e jogos
Florian Glaser, 2020-03- 3 (Update: 2020-03- 6)