Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GE65 Raider 9SF: Grandes melhorias em relação ao GE63

LFG raid. O GE65 é 19% menor e 12% mais leve que o GE63 de saída, mantendo as mesmas portas e a maioria dos recursos físicos. É um dos portáteis para jogos mais leves de 15,6 polegadas que você pode comprar da MSI fora o GS65.
MSI Laptop / Notebook Gaming Geforce
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US (GE65 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-9880H 8 x 2.3 - 4.8 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1215 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 441.66, Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, 1333.3 MHz, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, SHP14C5, 240 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
Placa de Som
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm mic-in, 3.5 mm headphone-out (HiFi / SPDIF), Card Reader: Leitor SD
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 26.9 x 357.7 x 248
Bateria
51 Wh Lítio-Ion, 6 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Quad speakers 2x 2 W + 2x 3 W, Teclado: SteelSeries chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, MSI Dragon Center, Driver e App Center, True Color, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.27 kg, Suprimento de energia: 988 g
Preço
2600 USD
Links
MSI página inicial
MSI Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.7 %
12/2019
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.3 kg26.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.8 %
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.3 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
83 %
09/2019
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		2.2 kg18.3 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.1 %
Maingear Vector 15
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		1.9 kg19.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.4 %
08/2019
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.4 kg25.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
❌
383 mm 260 mm 29.5 mm 2.6 kg362 mm 265 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 274 mm 25.9 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 26.9 mm 2.3 kg360.5 mm 276 mm 18.3 mm 2.2 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: 2x USB Type-A 3.2 Gen 1, SD card reader, AC adapter
Right: 2x USB Type-A 3.2 Gen 1, SD card reader, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Kensington Lock, 1 Gbps RJ-45, Mini-DisplayPort, USB Type-A 3.2 Gen 2, USB Type-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm headphones, 3.5 mm microphone
Left: Kensington Lock, 1 Gbps RJ-45, Mini-DisplayPort, USB Type-A 3.2 Gen 2, USB Type-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm headphones, 3.5 mm microphone
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
172.4 MB/s +566%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
172 MB/s +564%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.4 MB/s +203%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.9 MB/s +4%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.9 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
215 MB/s +621%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192.1 MB/s +545%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.3 MB/s +186%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
31.34 MB/s +5%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.8 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1374 (720min - 1484max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
629 (602min - 651max) MBit/s
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
548 MBit/s
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
507 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1291 (1212min - 1379max) MBit/s
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
660 MBit/s
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
656 MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
615 (508min - 642max) MBit/s
256.6
cd/m²		268.8
cd/m²		248.7
cd/m²
269.3
cd/m²		277.4
cd/m²		266.9
cd/m²
265.7
cd/m²		267.4
cd/m²		255.9
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 277.4 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 264.1 cd/m² Minimum: 14.26 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 277.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 1156:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.77
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080		MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
AU Optronics B156HAN07.1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
BOE NV156FHM-N4J, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080		Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080		Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Panda LM156LF-GL02, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display
-7%
-5%
-6%
-41%
-6%
Display P3 Coverage
69.3
65.1
-6%
67.7
-2%
65.3
-6%
40.13
-42%
65.3
-6%
sRGB Coverage
98.9
91.7
-7%
91.6
-7%
95.1
-4%
60.3
-39%
91.8
-7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.7
65.9
-7%
67.1
-5%
65.9
-7%
41.48
-41%
66.5
-6%
Response Times
17%
-17%
0%
-113%
-30%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13.2 ?(7.2, 6)
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
33%
19 ?(9, 10)
-44%
16.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)
-24%
26 ?(13.6, 12.4)
-97%
13.6 ?(7.2, 6.4)
-3%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
11.2 ?(5.2, 6)
-0%
10 ?(6, 4)
11%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
21%
25.6 ?(14.8, 10.8)
-129%
10 ?(6, 4)
11%
PWM Frequency
23150 ?(19)
23810 ?(24)
3%
200 ?(99)
-99%
Screen
-7%
2%
-51%
-84%
-29%
Brightness middle
277.4
268.3
-3%
477
72%
324.2
17%
290.1
5%
312.7
13%
Brightness
264
261
-1%
431
63%
304
15%
274
4%
305
16%
Brightness Distribution
90
84
-7%
84
-7%
90
0%
86
-4%
90
0%
Black Level *
0.24
0.2
17%
0.175
27%
0.38
-58%
0.54
-125%
0.27
-13%
Contrast
1156
1342
16%
2726
136%
853
-26%
537
-54%
1158
0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.51
2.65
-75%
4.17
-176%
5.01
-232%
5.16
-242%
4.57
-203%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.93
4.67
5%
6.97
-41%
12.7
-158%
18.09
-267%
6.81
-38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.77
2.76
-56%
2.51
-42%
1.64
7%
4.35
-146%
2.91
-64%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
2.2
41%
3.49
6%
7.9
-114%
4.4
-19%
4.3
-16%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.33 94%
2.5 88%
2.35 94%
2.1 105%
2.29 96%
CCT
7061 92%
6862 95%
7076 92%
8455 77%
7362 88%
7098 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65.1
59.3
-9%
60
-8%
60.8
-7%
38.1
-41%
59.4
-9%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.1
93.3
-6%
91
-8%
95.5
-4%
60
-39%
91.3
-8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / -4%
-7% / -2%
-19% / -34%
-79% / -80%
-22% / -25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 23150 Hz ≤ 19 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 23150 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 19 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 23150 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17909 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1496 (1486.55-1622.78)
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1619 (1602.44-1728.31)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1439 (1417.84-1545.36)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1291 (1278.24-1450)
Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
514 Points +8%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
509 Points +7%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
498 Points +5%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
479 Points +1%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
474 Points
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U
460 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (441 - 474, n=7)
459 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
434 Points -8%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H
422 Points -11%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
416 Points -12%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
388 Points -18%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
382 Points -19%
CPU (Multi Core)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
6910 Points +97%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
4463 Points +27%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
3795 Points +8%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
3505 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (2953 - 3712, n=7)
3271 Points -7%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2924 Points -17%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
2643 Points -25%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U
2598 Points -26%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
2333 Points -33%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H
1864 Points -47%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1765 Points -50%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1411 Points -60%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
215 Points +9%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
209 Points +6%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
203 Points +3%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
202 Points +2%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
198 Points
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U
191 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (181 - 198, n=11)
190.1 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
184 Points -7%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H
172 Points -13%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points -14%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points -19%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
149 Points -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
3049 Points +88%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
1962 Points +21%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1821 Points +12%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
1623 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (1317 - 1721, n=11)
1506 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
1231 Points -24%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1217 Points -25%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points -31%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U
1103 Points -32%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H
790 Points -51%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points -55%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
676 Points -58%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
198 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1623 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
131 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6452 Points
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
6283 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (5826 - 6452, n=2)
6139 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
5938 Points -8%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
5374 Points -17%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5316 Points -18%
Essentials
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9752 Points
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
9518 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (9146 - 9752, n=2)
9449 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
9364 Points -4%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8917 Points -9%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
8791 Points -10%
Productivity
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8273 Points
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
8209 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (8025 - 8273, n=2)
8149 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
7381 Points -11%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
7180 Points -13%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
6947 Points -16%
Digital Content Creation
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9034 Points
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
8617 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
8220 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (7311 - 9034, n=2)
8173 Points -10%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
6675 Points -26%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
6584 Points -27%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
5661 Points +21%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4679 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (4578 - 4679, n=2)
4629 Points -1%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
4207 Points -10%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4124 Points -12%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
3758 Points -20%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6095 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (5919 - 6095, n=2)
6007 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
5870 Points -4%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
5706 Points -6%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5577 Points -8%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
4677 Points -23%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4679 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6095 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
6452 pontos
Ajuda
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G		Alienware m15 R2 P87F
2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)		Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		MSI GE75 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD
-31%
-39%
-1%
-19%
2%
Seq Read
1211
904
-25%
1372
13%
1925
59%
1280
6%
1358
12%
Seq Write
2420
1344
-44%
746
-69%
2371
-2%
905
-63%
2381
-2%
4K Read
27.11
24.99
-8%
35.42
31%
37.2
37%
48.73
80%
27.02
0%
4K Write
88.9
107.4
21%
99.9
12%
108.9
22%
107
20%
89.2
0%
4K-64 Read
1665
631
-62%
302.1
-82%
1177
-29%
321.1
-81%
1642
-1%
4K-64 Write
1831
731
-60%
191.4
-90%
1135
-38%
761
-58%
1799
-2%
Access Time Read *
0.089
0.131
-47%
0.132
-48%
0.065
27%
0.058
35%
0.067
25%
Access Time Write *
0.208
0.099
52%
0.037
82%
0.108
48%
0.046
78%
0.05
76%
Score Read
1813
746
-59%
475
-74%
1407
-22%
498
-73%
1805
0%
Score Write
2162
973
-55%
366
-83%
1481
-31%
958
-56%
2127
-2%
Score Total
4956
2126
-57%
1065
-79%
3633
-27%
1711
-65%
4899
-1%
Copy ISO MB/s
2483
1187
-52%
1062
-57%
2073
-17%
1519
-39%
3193
29%
Copy Program MB/s
776
673
-13%
426
-45%
576
-26%
749
-3%
198.2
-74%
Copy Game MB/s
1621
1295
-20%
650
-60%
1426
-12%
943
-42%
1054
-35%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3309 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2398 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 537 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 407.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1987 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2361 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.04 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.7 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
33935 Points +62%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
27228 Points +30%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
25497 Points +21%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
23373 Points +11%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
20997 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
20917 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (18169 - 21138, n=19)
20123 Points -4%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
18055 Points -14%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
17792 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
17419 Points -17%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
14718 Points -30%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11332 Points -46%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9221 Points -56%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
14492 Points +81%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
11099 Points +38%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
9854 Points +23%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
9364 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
8036 Points 0%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
8028 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (7006 - 8028, n=18)
7651 Points -5%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
6910 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
6387 Points -20%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5689 Points -29%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5534 Points -31%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3626 Points -55%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
3517 Points -56%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
165374 Points +24%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
155800 Points +17%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
143576 Points +8%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
132852 Points
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
130614 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
129506 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (64283 - 135881, n=18)
117543 Points -12%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
116593 Points -12%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
115714 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
114009 Points -14%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
97136 Points -27%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
80615 Points -39%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
54393 Points -59%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
9021 Points +108%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
5799 Points +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
4713 Points +8%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
4346 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (3958 - 4627, n=13)
4294 Points -1%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
3742 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
3738 Points -14%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
43576 Points +69%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
39651 Points +53%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
34846 Points +35%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
31595 Points +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
29052 Points +12%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
25845 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (23335 - 27298, n=21)
25775 Points 0%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
23734 Points -8%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
23414 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
21861 Points -15%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
19670 Points -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
13270 Points -49%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
12620 Points -51%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
18934 Points +16%
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
18534 Points +13%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
16364 Points
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13950 Points -15%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13883 Points -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (8716 - 16364, n=21)
12534 Points -23%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
12450 Points -24%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
12192 Points -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
12064 Points -26%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11288 Points -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
9212 Points -44%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
7593 Points -54%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
6839 Points -58%
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark 11 Performance
22592 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
48855 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18601 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
8110 pontos
Ajuda
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
142 fps +49%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
124 fps +31%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
105 fps +11%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
95 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (74.2 - 97, n=11)
88.7 fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
87 fps -8%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
83 fps -13%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
67 fps -29%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
45 fps -53%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
43 fps -55%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
131 (110min - 147max) fps +67%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
95.5 fps +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
92.7 fps +18%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
78.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (64 - 82.1, n=21)
74.3 fps -5%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
68.9 fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
61.7 fps -21%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
51.6 fps -34%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
40 fps -49%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
36.5 fps -53%
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø69.3 (64-76)
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 325 309.3 292.5 170
The Witcher 3 (2015) 290.1 241.3 152.3 78.4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 143 107 101 95
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G		Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Eurocom Nightsky RX15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Noise
-3%
6%
2%
0%
13%
off / environment *
28.8
28.5
1%
30
-4%
28.2
2%
28.2
2%
28.3
2%
Idle Minimum *
33
33.9
-3%
31.3
5%
28.8
13%
28.2
15%
28.8
13%
Idle Average *
33
33.9
-3%
31.3
5%
31.4
5%
28.2
15%
28.8
13%
Idle Maximum *
33.1
34.3
-4%
31.3
5%
33.3
-1%
31.7
4%
29
12%
Load Average *
38
39.5
-4%
42
-11%
46.2
-22%
53.7
-41%
33.5
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52.9
56.2
-6%
42.1
20%
50.5
5%
53.7
-2%
45
15%
Load Maximum *
57.8
57.2
1%
46.5
20%
51.3
11%
53.7
7%
45.2
22%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
33 / 33 / 33.1 dB
Carga
38 / 57.8 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.945.345.440.843.42534.439.941.334.238.33134.736.537.13535.94035.237.733.634.336.15033.634.733.433.135.5633535.833.533.638.58034.834.534.635.436.110034.434.732.732.835.712533.631.632.631.434.716034.131.832.331.435.520033.231.230.930.736.325034.731.23030.636.631536.431.931.429.539.140037.934.529.629.641.250038.931.52928.642.763039.1312928.34380038.830.528.628.242.3100039.330.628.227.942.7125042.231.128.527.646.2160044.632.529.427.648.320004331.528.327.447250044.530.527.927.848.8315043.228.92827.446.9400043.829.427.927.249.1500042.629.227.627.347.363004228.527.527.346800036.927.627.727.142.41000033.127.427.527.238.2125003127.427.42736.11600029.627.527.827.133.4SPL54.142.540.539.858.3N9.54.53.93.712.4median 38.8median 31median 28.5median 27.8median 42.4Delta4.41.51.20.85.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Carga Máxima
 37.6 °C35.4 °C32.6 °C 
 36 °C45 °C28.8 °C 
 25.4 °C23.6 °C24.6 °C 
Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
49.6 °C28.2 °C53 °C
23.4 °C36.8 °C36.6 °C
22 °C26.6 °C24.8 °C
Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  42 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.745.439.72539.841.339.83140.537.140.54042.333.642.35042.333.442.36344.533.544.58044.334.644.310048.332.748.312554.132.654.116059.532.359.520059.830.959.825062.83062.831571.431.471.440074.729.674.750073.12973.163080.52980.580080.928.680.9100083.228.283.2125083.328.583.3160081.829.481.8200083.728.383.7250078.627.978.6315080.52880.5400080.827.980.850008127.681630077.327.577.380008127.7811000077.727.577.71250079.927.479.91600074.927.874.9SPL9340.593N103.63.9103.6median 79.9median 28.5median 79.9Delta51.2535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049USApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.05 / 1.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 15 / 18.5 / 20.2 Watt
Carga midlight 110.9 / 260 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Eurocom Nightsky RX15
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60		Maingear Vector 15
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60		MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption
-13%
2%
14%
14%
17%
Idle Minimum *
15
12.6
16%
16.2
-8%
12.5
17%
9.4
37%
9
40%
Idle Average *
18.5
21.4
-16%
21.1
-14%
15.3
17%
17.4
6%
14
24%
Idle Maximum *
20.2
34.4
-70%
26.4
-31%
20.7
-2%
19.6
3%
19
6%
Load Average *
110.9
123.2
-11%
85.1
23%
90.2
19%
103
7%
91
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
187.3
192.4
-3%
158.2
16%
162
14%
182
3%
Load Maximum *
260
246.6
5%
188
28%
209.3
19%
216
17%
238
8%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
6h 11min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 36min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 35min
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 51 Wh		MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 51 Wh		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh		Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 46 Wh		Maingear Vector 15
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh		HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Battery Runtime
14%
143%
15%
68%
23%
Reader / Idle
371
373
1%
953
157%
301
-19%
WiFi v1.3
216
237
10%
393
82%
249
15%
362
68%
197
-9%
Load
35
46
31%
102
191%
69
97%

Pro

+ Pequeno para um portátil de jogos de 15,6 polegadas
+ Manutenção fácil; 3 baias de armazenamento, 2 SODIMM
+ Tela IPS de 240 Hz bem calibrada
+ Alto desempenho da CPU e da GPU
+ Localização padrão da webcam
+ Quatro alto-falantes poderosos
+ Conectores de áudio dourados
+ Teclas do mouse dedicadas
+ Teclas de seta de tamanho completo

Contra

- Sem opções 4K UHD ou OLED
- Leitor de cartões SD muito lento
- Ventiladores barulhentos durante os jogos
- Ruído do ventilador sempre presente
- Teclas numéricas apertadas
- Portas apertadas
- A tampa poderia ser mais rígida
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Curta duração da bateria
- Relativamente grosso
In review: MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US. Test unit provided by MSI
In review: MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US. Test unit provided by MSI

Pegue o GE63, corte um pouco pelas laterais e você acaba com o GE65. A mais recente máquina de gama média da MSI mantém tudo o que gostamos no GE63 enquanto atualiza alguns dos aspectos que não gostamos no processo. Quer dizer que a série agora é visivelmente mais compacta e mais apta para viagens do que antes, sem ser mais barulhenta ou mais quente.

Por outro lado, algumas características menos desejáveis não melhoraram de modo geral entre gerações. O brilho da tela, as portas, a duração da bateria, a rigidez do chassi e o ruído são praticamente os mesmos do GE63. Como resultado, a escolha do GE65 sobre o GE63 será amplamente superficial.

Os potenciais compradores provavelmente compararão o MSI GE65 com o Asus ROG Strix Scar III G531GW já que os dois portáteis carregam a mesma CPU Core i9 e GPU RTX 2070. Depois de testar os dois sistemas, a solução MSI tem vantagem, pois é mais fácil manter, com mais opções de armazenamento, mais portas, um teclado melhor, uma webcam de verdade e ventiladores geralmente mais silenciosos durante cargas de trabalho baixas, enquanto o sistema Asus tem um design de chassi mais robusto com uma tela mais brilhante.

Por US$ 2.600, nossa configuração do Core i9 pode ser uma grande pílula para engolir para um portátil para jogos de gama média. Recomendamos a configuração Core i7 e a atualização do armazenamento para economizar custos, pois a manutenção é muito mais fácil do que no GS65. É difícil voltar aos monitores de 60 Hz depois de se acostumar com as opções de 144 ou 240 Hz.

MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US - 12/23/2019 v7
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
78 / 98 → 80%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
60 / 80 → 75%
Peso
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Bateria
55 / 95 → 58%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
95%
Desempenho da aplicação
93%
Temperatura
86 / 95 → 91%
Ruído
70 / 90 → 78%
Audio
83%
Camera
35 / 85 → 41%
Médio
75%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US (GE65 Serie)

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GE65 Raider 9SF: Grandes melhorias em relação ao GE63
Allen Ngo, 2019-12-27 (Update: 2020-01- 1)