Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - O Smartphone com recursos poderosos e S Pen incluído

Que haja luz! The Note20 Ultra raises the bar, especially with the display, but it also repeats old mistakes found in the Galaxy S20 Ultra. With a larger battery, a new design, an improved camera, and the S Pen, the most powerful Note model wants to win buyers' hearts over. Our review reveals whether there are any obstacles to this.
5G Android ARM Business Galaxy Note Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Galaxy Note Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 990 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Memória
12 GB 
, LPDDR5
Pantalha
6.90 polegadas 19.3:9, 3088 x 1440 pixel 494 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, native pen support, dynamic AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 120 Hz
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 221.3 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD de até 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de posição, acelerômetro, sensor geomagnético, sensor Hall, sensor de proximidade, barômetro, MST
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1,800, e 1,900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA (B1 (2,100), B2 (1,900), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B8 (900)), LTE (B1 (2,100), B2 (1,900), B3 (1,800), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B7 (2,600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B13 (700), B17 (700), B18 (800), B19 (800), B20, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.1 x 164.8 x 77.2
Bateria
4500 mAh Lítio-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (1/1.33", f/1.8, OIS) + 12 MP (ultra-wide angle, 1/2.55", f/2.2) + 12 MP (5x optical zoom, f/3.0, 1/3.0", OIS), 8K video, Camera2 API level: Full
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.2, DPAF)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: onscreen, Adaptador de força, cabo USB, SIM tool, fones, documentação, One UI, Microsoft apps, Spotify, 24 Meses Garantia, DRM Widevine L1, SAR (head): 0.338 W/kg, SAR (body): 1.470 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
peso
208 g, Suprimento de energia: 69 g
Preço
1 Euro
Links
Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.6 %
02/2021
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11		208 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"3088x1440
87.5 %
09/2019
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12		196 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.80"3040x1440
89 %
12/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16		198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
88.2 %
04/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650		208 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
87.1 %
09/2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU		226 g64 GB SSD6.50"2688x1242

Size comparison

❌
164.8 mm 77.2 mm 8.1 mm 208 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g162.3 mm 77.2 mm 7.9 mm 196 g158.1 mm 73.1 mm 8.8 mm 198 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (923min - 995max) MBit/s +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (584min - 715max) MBit/s -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
816 (403min - 832max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
772 (691min - 832max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (461min - 625max) MBit/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
558 (496min - 582max) MBit/s -28%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
534 (468min - 587max) MBit/s -31%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (912min - 1092max) MBit/s +16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (468min - 602max) MBit/s -39%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
883 (834min - 919max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
870 (841min - 882max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
670 (326min - 802max) MBit/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
349 (310min - 384max) MBit/s -60%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (550min - 597max) MBit/s -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s -57%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø870 (841-882)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (691-832)
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge section
Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge section
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Overview
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Overview
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Turning point
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Turning point
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Bridge section
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Bridge section

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow-LightZoomUltraweitwinkel
ColorChecker
9.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra: 5.98 ∆E min: 2.09 - max: 13.62 ∆E
ColorChecker
20 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
30 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra: 26.47 ∆E min: 12.19 - max: 38.55 ∆E
870
cd/m²		878
cd/m²		889
cd/m²
867
cd/m²		860
cd/m²		889
cd/m²
883
cd/m²		869
cd/m²		898
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 898 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 878.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.91 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 860 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.90		Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Dynamic AMOLED, 3040x1440, 6.80		Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53		Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67		Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.50
Screen
9%
4%
30%
23%
Brightness middle
860
683
-21%
592
-31%
753
-12%
790
-8%
Brightness
878
694
-21%
605
-31%
762
-13%
790
-10%
Brightness Distribution
96
96
0%
96
0%
96
0%
97
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.5
2.9
36%
2.5
44%
0.9
80%
1.4
69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.4
4.8
54%
5.5
47%
1.6
85%
3.4
67%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
2.2
8%
2.6
-8%
1.5
37%
1.9
21%
Gamma
2 110%
2.11 104%
2.16 102%
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
CCT
6466 101%
6247 104%
6173 105%
6415 101%
6466 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

HDR - Mixed colors (target color space: DCI P3)
HDR - Mixed colors (target color space: DCI P3)
HDR - Grayscale tracking (target color space: BT.2020)
HDR - Grayscale tracking (target color space: BT.2020)
HDR - Saturation (target color space: DCI P3)
HDR - Saturation (target color space: DCI P3)

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | Basemark GPU 1.1 | VRMark | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
834 Points -11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
906 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1326 Points +41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (903 - 944, n=5)
929 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)
913 Points -3%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2787 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2331 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3338 Points +20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3476 Points +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (2731 - 2899, n=5)
2800 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)
2996 Points +7%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4789 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4667 - 4789, n=2)
4728 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 9992, n=85, last 2 years)
4251 Points -11%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5532 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5364 - 5532, n=2)
5448 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 10711, n=77, last 2 years)
4053 Points -27%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4965 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4549 Points -8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3898 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4261 Points -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4791 - 4965, n=2)
4878 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)
5228 Points +5%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
12561 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
10367 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12280 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13186 Points +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (12557 - 12561, n=2)
12559 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)
14045 Points +12%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14551 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
11813 Points -19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13142 Points -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (13627 - 14760, n=5)
14391 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +4%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
11784 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9027 Points -23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10952 Points -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10008 - 11784, n=5)
10612 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points -8%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
67590 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
54233 Points -20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
82937 Points +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (41415 - 68943, n=4)
61100 Points -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
84533 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
66142 Points -22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
150281 Points +78%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points +144%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (48476 - 87223, n=4)
74951 Points -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
39724 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33268 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
32384 Points -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (27431 - 42135, n=4)
37265 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7152 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4502 Points -37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9123 Points +28%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5646 - 8097, n=5)
6920 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9480 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5043 Points -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12394 Points +31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6388 - 11488, n=5)
9004 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3846 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3273 Points -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4729 Points +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3846 - 4124, n=5)
3990 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7385 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4618 Points -37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8823 Points +19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (7385 - 8485, n=5)
7798 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)
9351 Points +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9536 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5083 Points -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12694 Points +33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (9470 - 11868, n=5)
10329 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)
16352 Points +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4127 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3498 Points -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4283 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3935 - 4455, n=5)
4240 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)
4426 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6658 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4940 Points -26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7157 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6544 - 6896, n=5)
6733 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)
2755 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8156 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5712 Points -30%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8299 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8005 - 8469, n=5)
8260 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)
2751 Points -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4052 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3353 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4895 Points +21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3963 - 4267, n=5)
4091 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)
3163 Points -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6830 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5143 Points -25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7986 Points +17%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6638 - 7459, n=5)
7083 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)
6737 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8239 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6036 Points -27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9356 Points +14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (870 - 9190, n=5)
7112 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)
9723 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4273 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3389 Points -21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points +30%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5277 Points +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4063 - 4495, n=5)
4284 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)
4224 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5178 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4713 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6578 Points +27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5042 - 6355, n=5)
5599 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=99, last 2 years)
2671 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6378 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6186 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8173 Points +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6136 - 8783, n=5)
7254 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=99, last 2 years)
2850 Points -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3122 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2571 Points -18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3830 Points +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3104 - 3230, n=5)
3154 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=99, last 2 years)
2675 Points -14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
110 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
58 fps -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps -45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (60 - 119, n=5)
81.8 fps -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps -23%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
145 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
95 fps -34%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps +5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
203 fps +40%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps +98%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (145 - 200, n=5)
186.8 fps +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +70%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
90 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
56 fps -38%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (59 - 90, n=5)
65.8 fps -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps -20%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
96 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
89 fps -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
122 fps +27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (96 - 126, n=5)
108.8 fps +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +46%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
61 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
36 fps -41%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
77 fps +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (58 - 61, n=5)
59 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps 0%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
65 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
65 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps +54%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (65 - 85, n=5)
77.4 fps +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +52%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps +41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (34 - 45, n=5)
42 fps +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +28%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
38 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
28 fps -26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (38 - 51, n=5)
47.6 fps +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +58%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27 fps -45%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (49 - 52, n=5)
50.8 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)
44 fps -10%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
43 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
48 fps +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
54 (20min) fps +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps +74%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (43 - 58, n=5)
53.4 fps +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)
64.3 fps +50%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
17 fps -50%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps +35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (22 - 34, n=5)
29.8 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)
32.8 fps -4%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps -18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps +32%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (20 - 23, n=5)
21.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)
25.6 fps +16%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
527820 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
595466 Points +13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
510245 Points -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (296746 - 527820, n=5)
469996 Points -11%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
39.13 (10.62min - 99.35max) fps
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (9.36min - 74.72max) fps
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (71.4 - 71.6, n=2)
71.5 fps
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27.47 (12.07min - 47.94max) fps
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (11.09min - 63.1max) fps
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (42.3 - 63, n=2)
52.7 fps
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33.38 (8.52min - 83.34max) fps
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (4.07min - 95.16max) fps
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (84.1 - 85.6, n=2)
84.9 fps
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4985 Score
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7156 Score
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4607 - 4957, n=3)
4783 Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years)
5985 Score
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4637 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6072 Points +27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4764 - 4915, n=5)
4815 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +20%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9024 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
7965 Points -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10002 Points +11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8843 - 9478, n=5)
9209 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +7%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3811 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4646 Points +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points +61%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7945 Points +108%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3775 - 4497, n=5)
4037 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +64%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10646 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9092 Points -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11567 Points +9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10646 - 10803, n=5)
10744 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +34%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1439 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
1374 Points -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1514 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (1270 - 1439, n=5)
1351 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +4%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.1 Points +127%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +87%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.9 Points +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
65 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
56.8 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 56.8, n=5)
53.8 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samung Browser 9.2)
42.69 Points -25%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.9 Points +214%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.5 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
115.4 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
96.2 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 96.2, n=5)
92.8 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
84.5 Points -12%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
68.6 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 64.4, n=4)
60.4 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
runs/min
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points +77%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +30%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
118 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
102 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
101 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 102, n=5)
94.4 Points -7%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points +151%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33503 Points +70%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
22834 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
19695 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
19135 Points -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 20022, n=5)
19019 Points -3%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
2528 ms * -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2294 - 2511, n=5)
2387 ms * -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
2296 ms *
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
2021 ms * +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1963 ms * +15%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
571 ms * +75%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Note20 UltraSamsung Galaxy Note10+Huawei Mate 30 ProXiaomi Mi 10 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
7%
13%
27%
20%
Sequential Read 256KB
1782
1504
-16%
1781
0%
1739
-2%
1760 ?(1004 - 2037, n=87)
-1%
1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years)
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB
802
588
-27%
401.8
-50%
750
-6%
1134 ?(452 - 1873, n=87)
41%
1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years)
39%
Random Read 4KB
186.7
196.2
5%
226.4
21%
264.9
42%
281 ?(173.5 - 543, n=87)
51%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years)
32%
Random Write 4KB
217.7
183.6
-16%
259.2
19%
258.5
19%
311 ?(197.5 - 499, n=88)
43%
272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years)
25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
65.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
82.5 ?(Nano Memory Card)
26%
75.9 ?(65.6 - 85.8, n=4)
16%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
55.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
69.2 ?(Nano Memory Card)
24%
61.9 ?(55.6 - 69.3, n=4)
11%
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.19.0: Ø39.8 (37-41)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 0.19.0: Ø39.8 (37-41)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.19.0: Ø39.9 (37-41)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra; Dead Trigger 2; 1.6.9: Ø88 (57-118)
Carga Máxima
 32.9 °C33.1 °C30.8 °C 
 33.8 °C33.3 °C31.3 °C 
 32.5 °C33 °C30.7 °C 
Máximo: 33.8 °C
Médio: 32.4 °C
29.1 °C30.7 °C30 °C
29.1 °C31.1 °C30.3 °C
28.8 °C30.7 °C30.7 °C
Máximo: 31.1 °C
Médio: 30.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  25.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.923.3252923.73121.927.44022225029.935.36322288019.330.710016.331.31251440.316016.956.120014.954.625014.158.63151066.74001165.750011.766.763010.969.480011.972.310001176.4125010.276.8160011.477.8200012.879250012.979315012.578.440001378.5500013.175.8630013.475.3800015.776.11000013.573.5125001470.31600013.763.9SPL24.888.8N0.677.4median 13median 73.5Delta1.37.832.239.436.225.529.126.83027.742.342.426.827.220.325.22536.717.244.817.954.317.153.817.95316.253.616.55615.35915.664.415.664.814.867.214.472.314.67314.776.914.176.414.476.914.475.914.973.514.773.814.57214.866.6156316.649.427.185.80.961median 15median 64.81.39.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Note20 UltraApple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.24 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.06 / 1.49 Watt
Carga midlight 4.91 / 10.29 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh		Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh		Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh		Average Samsung Exynos 990
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-31%
-13%
9%
-49%
-22%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.7
-8%
0.87
-34%
0.61
6%
0.92
-42%
0.846 ?(0.65 - 1, n=5)
-30%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
-38%
Idle Average *
1.06
1.81
-71%
1.75
-65%
1.19
-12%
2.9
-174%
1.534 ?(1.06 - 1.91, n=5)
-45%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
-37%
Idle Maximum *
1.49
1.92
-29%
1.83
-23%
1.23
17%
2.94
-97%
1.858 ?(1.49 - 2.3, n=5)
-25%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
-9%
Load Average *
4.91
7.57
-54%
3.85
22%
4.18
15%
3.65
26%
5.14 ?(4.72 - 5.8, n=5)
-5%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
-13%
Load Maximum *
10.29
9.34
9%
6.64
35%
8.53
17%
6.18
40%
10.7 ?(9.99 - 11.8, n=5)
-4%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
19%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
20h 23min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 84)
10h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 33min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 38min
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh		Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh		Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
21%
16%
53%
Reader / Idle
1223
1585
30%
2174
78%
2133
74%
2618
114%
H.264
993
934
-6%
1098
11%
973
-2%
1346
36%
WiFi v1.3
644
532
-17%
823
28%
865
34%
909
41%
Load
338
305
-10%
219
-35%
198
-41%
408
21%

Pro

+ Tela OLED super brilhante com HDR10
+ Bom alto-falantes
+ Caneta S
+ Configuração forte de câmera tripla
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ Wi-Fi 6, 5G, eSIM
+ Certificação IP68

Contra

- Slot microSD lento
- 120 Hz somente em Full HD
- Nem aptX, nem aptX HD
- Política SoC

Veredicto - Uma escolha difícil

In review: Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra. Review device provided by Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra. Review device provided by Samsung Germany.

Na hora dos testes, o Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra é um dos melhores smartphones disponíveis. O phablet brilha no teste com uma tela AMOLED muito brilhante, alta velocidade do sistema, uma câmera boa e versátil, alto-falantes agradáveis e um design sofisticado. E ainda há a S Pen, um produto muito desenvolvido com muitos recursos excelentes.

O Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra oferece um pacote bastante completo, e a promessa de atualização de três anos garante uma vida longa.

Apenas uma olhada nos detalhes revela pequenos aborrecimentos; isso inclui, acima de tudo, o dilema dos diferentes SoCs, que simplesmente deixa um gosto ruim na boca. Não apenas o desempenho é mais fraco com o SoC Exynos, mas a eficiência energética também sofre, e o 5G tem que lidar com a falta de suporte para mmWave. A calibração da tela poderia ter sido um pouco mais precisa também; embora isso seja dificilmente perceptível a olho nu, impede uma melhor avaliação da tela. Além disso,  também seria de se esperar de um produto de última geração que o modo de 120 Hz do painel funcionasse em resolução QHD+ também.

Para os amantes do Note, não há maneira de contornar o Galaxy Note20 Ultra, mas os proprietários da versão do ano passado, em particular, encontrarão pouco incentivo para atualizar, já que a Samsung simplesmente não melhorou alguns detalhes. Os usuários que não têm problemas com o preço alto receberão um ótimo smartphone.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - 08/31/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
96%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
98%
Conectividade
70 / 70 → 100%
Peso
88%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 64 → 88%
Desempenho da aplicação
80 / 86 → 93%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
80%
Médio
84%
90%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - O Smartphone com recursos poderosos e S Pen incluído
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-09- 9 (Update: 2020-09-13)