Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite - Versão mais barata do phablet de caneta

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/19/2020

Esboços mais baratos. Para conquistar mais clientes para a série Galaxy Note com caneta, a Samsung lançou pela primeira vez a versão mais barata, o Galaxy Note 10 Lite. Leia nossa análise para descobrir por que achamos que essa foi uma boa ideia.

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Galaxy Note Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 9810
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
Memória
6144 MB 
Pantalha
6.7 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 1 TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, barômetro
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1800/​1900), LTE (1,2,3,4,5,7,8,12,14,18,19,20,28,29,30), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.7 x 163.7 x 76.1
Bateria
4500 mAh Lítio-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​1.7, phase detection AF (dual-pixel), OIS, LED flash, Videos @2160p/​60FPS (camera 1); 12.0MP, f/​2.4, phase detection AF, OIS, telephoto lens (camera 2); 12.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB, fones, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE-A pro Cat 18 (1200/150 Mbit/s); SAR value: 0.291W/​kg (head), 1.077W/​kg (body); stylus, fanless
peso
199 g, Suprimento de energia: 71 g
Preço
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82 %
02/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18
199 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.7"2400x1080
86 %
08/2019
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12
168 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.3"2280x1080
89 %
12/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
87 %
09/2019
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.1"1792x828
83 %
12/2019
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
86 %
10/2019
OnePlus 7T
SD 855+, Adreno 640
190 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite

Size Comparison

163.7 mm 76.1 mm 8.7 mm 199 g160.94 mm 74.44 mm 8.13 mm 190 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g158.1 mm 73.1 mm 8.8 mm 198 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g151 mm 71.8 mm 7.9 mm 168 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (min: 912, max: 1092) MBit/s ∼100% +173%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (min: 468, max: 602) MBit/s ∼53% +44%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (min: 490, max: 597) MBit/s ∼56% +52%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (min: 374, max: 485) MBit/s ∼43% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
390 (min: 294, max: 447) MBit/s ∼39% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
370 (min: 342, max: 372) MBit/s ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (min: 317, max: 341) MBit/s ∼33% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=504)
244 MBit/s ∼24% -34%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (min: 923, max: 995) MBit/s ∼100% +133%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (min: 584, max: 715) MBit/s ∼66% +53%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (min: 204, max: 603) MBit/s ∼55% +27%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
440 (min: 245, max: 489) MBit/s ∼46% +6%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (min: 238, max: 447) MBit/s ∼44% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
415 (min: 295, max: 452) MBit/s ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (min: 321, max: 333) MBit/s ∼34% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=504)
227 MBit/s ∼23% -45%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø356 (315-388)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø415 (295-452)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – turn
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – turn
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
23.3 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
29 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
21 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite: 29.86 ∆E min: 12.31 - max: 43.43 ∆E
ColorChecker
13 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite: 7.97 ∆E min: 1.71 - max: 16.26 ∆E
Test chart – perfect lighting
Test chart – perfect lighting
Test chart – 1 lux
542
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 560 cd/m² Médio: 536.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 510 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
140.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.242
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Dynamic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.3
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Screen
35%
29%
49%
15%
29%
Brightness middle
510
764
50%
592
16%
679
33%
625
23%
693
36%
Brightness
536
757
41%
605
13%
671
25%
607
13%
703
31%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
96
5%
93
2%
89
-2%
96
5%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.6
2.66
60%
2.5
62%
0.8
88%
4.38
34%
3.42
48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
17.56
5.65
68%
5.5
69%
2.4
86%
6.83
61%
6.12
65%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.9
3.2
-10%
2.6
10%
1.1
62%
4.1
-41%
3.3
-14%
Gamma
2.242 98%
2.073 106%
2.16 102%
2.24 98%
2.251 98%
2.265 97%
CCT
6989 93%
6326 103%
6173 105%
6610 98%
7251 90%
6799 96%
Contrast
999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 229.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 229.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 229.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17159 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3794 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2457 Points ∼65% -35%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3222 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
891 Points ∼23% -77%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
3794 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3794, n=44)
1380 Points ∼36% -64%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4140 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4593 Points ∼100% +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4442 Points ∼97% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1128 Points ∼25% -73%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2707 Points ∼59% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
4140 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=52)
1756 Points ∼38% -58%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2033 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2191 Points ∼63% +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3059 Points ∼88% +50%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3463 Points ∼100% +70%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1723 Points ∼50% -15%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2753 Points ∼79% +35%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
2033 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=64)
1831 Points ∼53% -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
679 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
822 Points ∼61% +21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
783 Points ∼58% +15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1343 Points ∼100% +98%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points ∼40% -20%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
783 Points ∼58% +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
679 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=64)
522 Points ∼39% -23%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5851 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8801 Points ∼85% +50%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼100% +76%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points ∼73% +29%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points ∼84% +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (5184 - 5851, n=4)
5411 Points ∼52% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=438)
5517 Points ∼53% -6%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6571 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
11011 Points ∼79% +68%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼100% +112%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points ∼65% +38%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points ∼74% +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (5736 - 6571, n=4)
6022 Points ∼43% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=601)
6014 Points ∼43% -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2758 Points ∼71% -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points ∼72% -11%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points ∼90% +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
3120 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=105)
2672 Points ∼69% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4201 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
6342 Points ∼96% +51%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼96% +52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points ∼32% -49%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
4201 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=105)
2795 Points ∼42% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3613 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4921 Points ∼88% +36%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼100% +54%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points ∼41% -37%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points ∼99% +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
3613 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=105)
2532 Points ∼45% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3649 Points ∼65% +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +79%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼58% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points ∼57% +2%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points ∼83% +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2546 - 3120, n=4)
2717 Points ∼49% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=444)
2043 Points ∼37% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4806 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
6087 Points ∼75% +27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼82% +39%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points ∼30% -50%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points ∼98% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3697 - 4806, n=4)
4023 Points ∼50% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9345, n=444)
1882 Points ∼23% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4291 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5300 Points ∼77% +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼93% +49%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼88% +41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points ∼37% -40%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points ∼100% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3376 - 4291, n=4)
3634 Points ∼53% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 7982, n=445)
1748 Points ∼25% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3148 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3746 Points ∼73% +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼100% +63%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼66% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points ∼62% +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points ∼88% +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2561 - 3148, n=4)
2752 Points ∼54% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5209, n=473)
1954 Points ∼38% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3958 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5605 Points ∼31% +42%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼45% +101%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +351%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points ∼20% -8%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points ∼64% +189%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3958 - 4904, n=4)
4626 Points ∼26% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=473)
2498 Points ∼14% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3744 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5048 Points ∼55% +35%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼77% +90%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼100% +146%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points ∼38% -6%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points ∼93% +128%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3744 - 4124, n=4)
3994 Points ∼43% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=473)
2105 Points ∼23% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3056 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3559 Points ∼72% +16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100% +61%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼49% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points ∼65% +4%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points ∼92% +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2469 - 3056, n=4)
2645 Points ∼54% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4909, n=524)
1946 Points ∼40% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4422 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5659 Points ∼79% +28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼91% +46%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼80% +29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points ∼31% -49%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3553 - 4422, n=4)
3808 Points ∼53% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=524)
1571 Points ∼22% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4022 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5003 Points ∼79% +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼96% +50%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼70% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points ∼38% -40%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points ∼100% +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3244 - 4022, n=4)
3469 Points ∼55% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7012, n=525)
1504 Points ∼24% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3087 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3670 Points ∼75% +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼100% +59%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points ∼65% +3%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points ∼89% +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2496 - 3087, n=4)
2675 Points ∼55% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=565)
1814 Points ∼37% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5586 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5732 Points ∼53% +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼71% +37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points ∼32% -37%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points ∼100% +93%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (4569 - 5586, n=4)
4905 Points ∼45% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11488, n=564)
2053 Points ∼19% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4734 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5096 Points ∼63% +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼84% +44%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼42% -28%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points ∼100% +72%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3895 - 4734, n=4)
4137 Points ∼51% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8866, n=567)
1774 Points ∼22% -63%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
80 fps ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
50 fps ∼16% -37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼47% +90%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +303%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼26% +5%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼57% +131%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (80 - 147, n=4)
129 fps ∼40% +61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=734)
40.4 fps ∼13% -49%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
58 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55 fps ∼92% -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (58 - 60, n=4)
59.5 fps ∼99% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=743)
29.1 fps ∼49% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
73 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
69 fps ∼39% -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼61% +45%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +140%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼23% -44%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps ∼64% +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (73 - 76, n=4)
74 fps ∼42% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=638)
23.5 fps ∼13% -68%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
57 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
57 fps ∼95% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼63% -33%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (45 - 57, n=4)
48.5 fps ∼81% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=647)
20.3 fps ∼34% -64%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
24 fps ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
47 fps ∼40% +96%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼48% +133%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +388%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼26% +25%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼68% +229%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (24 - 47, n=4)
40.5 fps ∼35% +69%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=503)
19 fps ∼16% -21%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
46 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
45 fps ∼62% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100% +59%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼82% +30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼37% -41%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps ∼79% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (24 - 46, n=4)
29.8 fps ∼41% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=505)
17.6 fps ∼24% -62%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
17 fps ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
29 fps ∼48% +71%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼43% +53%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +253%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼17% -41%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps ∼45% +59%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
17 fps ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=238)
10.3 fps ∼17% -39%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
11 fps ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
18 fps ∼55% +64%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼58% +73%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +200%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼30% -9%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps ∼55% +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
11 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=236)
7.41 fps ∼22% -33%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
28 fps ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
35 fps ∼58% +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼67% +43%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼27% -43%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% +46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
28 fps ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=242)
15.3 fps ∼26% -45%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
31 fps ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38 fps ∼44% +23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼56% +58%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼100% +181%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼21% -42%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼54% +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
31 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=242)
17.4 fps ∼20% -44%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
29 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
21 fps ∼29% -28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼56% +41%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +152%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼23% -41%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼64% +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (28 - 29, n=4)
28.3 fps ∼39% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=428)
12.9 fps ∼18% -56%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
25 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
21 fps ∼35% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼57% +36%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +140%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼25% -40%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (14 - 25, n=4)
17 fps ∼28% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=432)
11.5 fps ∼19% -54%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1300 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1638 Points ∼100% +26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼89% +12%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1237 Points ∼76% -5%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points ∼91% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (1099 - 1300, n=4)
1160 Points ∼71% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=668)
778 Points ∼47% -40%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6444 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9465 Points ∼89% +47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼95% +57%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3878 Points ∼37% -40%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points ∼100% +65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (6370 - 6506, n=4)
6423 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=668)
2206 Points ∼21% -66%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2771 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4598 Points ∼75% +66%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼100% +121%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4281 Points ∼70% +54%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points ∼79% +76%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2068 - 2771, n=4)
2533 Points ∼41% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=668)
1619 Points ∼26% -42%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5707 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8014 Points ∼86% +40%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼100% +63%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6445 Points ∼69% +13%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points ∼97% +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (5707 - 6413, n=4)
6123 Points ∼66% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=668)
3145 Points ∼34% -45%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3393 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4889 Points ∼91% +44%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼100% +59%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3392 Points ∼63% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points ∼95% +51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3110 - 3393, n=4)
3273 Points ∼61% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=668)
1580 Points ∼29% -53%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
58288 Points ∼82%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
70955 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
49376 Points ∼70% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
58288 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 110361, n=53)
46667 Points ∼66% -20%
MEM (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
51005 Points ∼51%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
100390 Points ∼100% +97%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51664 Points ∼51% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
51005 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (16319 - 100390, n=53)
50474 Points ∼50% -1%
GPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
117851 Points ∼73%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
160733 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
70647 Points ∼44% -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
117851 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 214615, n=53)
89526 Points ∼56% -24%
CPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
102716 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
151146 Points ∼100% +47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
94730 Points ∼63% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
102716 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40620 - 178616, n=53)
94932 Points ∼63% -8%
Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
329860 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼100% +46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points ∼55% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
329860 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 599843, n=53)
281636 Points ∼58% -15%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +312%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼50% +104%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.295 Points ∼49% +102%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
47.968 Points ∼36% +49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.038 Points ∼35% +43%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=133)
37.1 Points ∼28% +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
32.3 Points ∼24% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
32.259 Points ∼24%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +366%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.83 Points ∼41% +92%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼39% +83%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
86.917 Points ∼30% +38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.228 Points ∼27% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (62.9 - 69.6, n=4)
65.8 Points ∼22% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
62.949 Points ∼21%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=564)
43.6 Points ∼15% -31%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +303%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼47% +90%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min ∼44% +77%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chome 76)
59.7 runs/min ∼38% +53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min ∼28% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=121)
40.6 runs/min ∼26% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chome 80)
39 runs/min ∼25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
39 runs/min ∼25% 0%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +156%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼65% +65%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points ∼54% +39%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
97 Points ∼53% +35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points ∼42% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
72 Points ∼39%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (63 - 72, n=4)
67.8 Points ∼37% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=196)
67.6 Points ∼37% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +277%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points ∼52% +96%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48% +82%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
18908 Points ∼39% +46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points ∼33% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (12933 - 15233, n=4)
14397 Points ∼29% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
12933 Points ∼26%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=725)
7128 Points ∼15% -45%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=750)
10258 ms * ∼100% -222%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
3188.8 ms * ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2769.8 ms * ∼27% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (2060 - 3189, n=4)
2509 ms * ∼24% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
2478.2 ms * ∼24% +22%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021.4 ms * ∼20% +37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼19% +38%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼6% +82%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Note10 LiteSamsung Galaxy Note10Huawei Mate 30 ProXiaomi Mi Note 10OnePlus 7TAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
95%
71%
-12%
11%
-4%
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
16%
59.3 (25.5 - 72.4, n=21)
-1%
50.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=470)
-16%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
12%
74.1 (28.2 - 88.2, n=21)
1%
68.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=470)
-7%
Random Write 4KB
142
191.9
35%
259.21
83%
118.9
-16%
29.9
-79%
90.8 (18.2 - 250, n=45)
-36%
26.1 (0.14 - 259, n=802)
-82%
Random Read 4KB
132
194.2
47%
226.38
72%
106.2
-20%
170.1
29%
138 (96.8 - 161, n=45)
5%
51.3 (1.59 - 226, n=802)
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB
190.8
590.3
209%
401.79
111%
243.6
28%
218.4
14%
213 (182 - 503, n=45)
12%
107 (2.99 - 729, n=802)
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB
776.7
1478.3
90%
1780.5
129%
480.5
-38%
1406
81%
759 (427 - 912, n=45)
-2%
295 (12.1 - 1781, n=802)
-62%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø59.8 (59-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø59.8 (59-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.0.5a: Ø29.7 (26-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.0.5a: Ø29.7 (25-31)
Carga Máxima
 38.5 °C35.6 °C33.2 °C 
 39.4 °C35.8 °C33.2 °C 
 38.9 °C35.9 °C32.4 °C 
Máximo: 39.4 °C
Médio: 35.9 °C
31.2 °C34.6 °C35 °C
31.4 °C34.4 °C37.5 °C
30.8 °C34.6 °C39.1 °C
Máximo: 39.1 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260/Fluke t3000 FC
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.642.32545.343.23137.137.24037.4385040.238.7633734.48028.628.210027.528.512526.927.116024.931.520022.942.125022.549.131521.455.24002361.150021.165.763022.265.78002068.1100019.871.5125018.373.8160017.876.7200017.673.8250016.868.431501770.4400016.770500017.867.5630016.871.4800017.173.71000017.2681250017.453.51600017.448SPL68.530.983.6N22.91.556.7median 18.3median 67.5Delta2.610.939.943.643.849.536.538.836.142.745.144.635.736.426.732.328.529.326.532.824.841.824.646.82452.122.555.62058.320.466.519.866.719.365.223.869.117.871.31871.517.37016.668.615.760.915.765.715.770.915.672.115.769.415.76415.757.715.755.763.268.730.780.917.322.21.549.5median 18median 65.24.38.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Note10 LiteSamsung Galaxy Note10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.6 / 1.9 Watt
Carga midlight 8.4 / 10.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
5%
18%
-2%
12%
4%
19%
16%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.9
-0%
0.87
3%
0.56
38%
0.7
22%
0.9
-0%
0.783 (0.65 - 0.9, n=4)
13%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=818)
2%
Idle Average *
1.6
1.2
25%
1.75
-9%
2.99
-87%
1.8
-13%
1.4
12%
1.315 (0.81 - 1.9, n=4)
18%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=817)
-9%
Idle Maximum *
1.9
2
-5%
1.83
4%
3.02
-59%
2.2
-16%
2.9
-53%
1.903 (0.92 - 3.7, n=4)
-0%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=818)
-7%
Load Average *
8.4
7.7
8%
3.85
54%
4.17
50%
5.2
38%
4.7
44%
5.76 (4.58 - 8.4, n=4)
31%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=812)
51%
Load Maximum *
10.3
10.5
-2%
6.64
36%
5.44
47%
7.5
27%
8.3
19%
7.06 (5.16 - 10.3, n=4)
31%
5.99 (1.2 - 14.2, n=812)
42%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
36h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 51min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 34min
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Battery Runtime
-27%
-7%
6%
24%
-4%
Reader / Idle
2205
1392
-37%
2174
-1%
2765
25%
2134
-3%
2003
-9%
H.264
1071
803
-25%
1098
3%
1147
7%
1423
33%
967
-10%
WiFi v1.3
904
583
-36%
823
-9%
866
-4%
1127
25%
896
-1%
Load
274
246
-10%
219
-20%
267
-3%
387
41%
283
3%

Pro

+ Caneta incrível
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Bom equipamento de câmera
+ GPS preciso
+ Baixa temperatura

Contra

- Afogamento sob carga prolongada
- Plástico de qualidade moderada
- Sem certificação IP

Veredicto - Opção barata com modificações

In review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite
In review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite

O Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite é uma versão mais barata dos smartphones carros-chefes da Samsung. Isso se torna imediatamente aparente a partir da carcaça de plástico bastante simplista, SoC de gama média, alto-falante mono básico, a luminosidade da tela ligeiramente mais baixa e a quantidade reduzida de frequências LTE suportadas.

No entanto, o Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite não precisa ser visto como uma versão reduzida. Dependendo das preferências do usuário, o Note10 Lite pode até ter algumas vantagens, com a maior duração da bateria provavelmente sendo a mais relevante. Quem prefere áudio analógico tem acesso a um conector de áudio de 3,5 mm e os fanáticos de expansão de armazenamento podem usar um cartão microSD para aumentar o espaço de armazenamento. O Galaxy Note10 não possui nenhuma dessas opções.

O Samsung Galaxy Note10 é um ponto de entrada relativamente barato na família de dispositivos Galaxy Note e recebe uma recomendação nossa.

Além disso, a qualidade da imagem das câmeras é boa, o GPS é preciso, o software é moderno e a excelente caneta é quase única, pois abre toda uma gama de novas possibilidades com apenas alguns recursos ausentes em comparação com os outros smartphones Note10.

Recomendamos o Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite para quem sempre quis um smartphone Galaxy Note mais barato. Embora possa valer a pena dar uma olhada no Galaxy Note 9, que, embora tenha alguns meses mais velho, pode ser comprado a um preço semelhante ao Note10 Lite.

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite - 02/14/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
76%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
51 / 70 → 72%
Peso
88%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
42 / 64 → 66%
Desempenho da aplicação
63 / 86 → 74%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
73%
Médio
76%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite - Versão mais barata do phablet de caneta
Florian Schmitt, 2020-02-19 (Update: 2020-03- 3)