Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Finalmente um excelente tablet Android

Competição para o iPad Pro. Como a Samsung não lança nenhum tablet com tela maior que 11 polegadas há muito tempo, estamos muito felizes em ver o Galaxy Tab S7+, que apresenta um SoC de primeira linha. Leia nossa análise para saber se há alguma outra surpresa.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Galaxy Tab S9 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 8 x 2.4 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Placa gráfica
Memória
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Pantalha
12.40 polegadas 16:10, 2800 x 1752 pixel 266 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 120 Hz
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 221.4 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C , Card Reader: microSD de até 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de movimento, giroscópio, sensor geomagnético, sensor de efeito hall
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 5.7 x 285 x 185
Bateria
10090 mAh Lítio-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix + 5 MP (ultra wide-angle); Camera2 API Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 4 alto-falantes da AKG, Dolby Atmos, Teclado: virtual, capa de teclado opcional, S Pen, One UI 2.5, Microsoft apps, Facebook, Spotify, Netflix, Galaxy Store, 24 Meses Garantia, DRM Widevine L1, fanless
peso
575 g
Preço
954 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.1 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650
575 g5.7 mm12.40"2800x1752
89.3 %
05/2020
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU
641 g5.9 mm12.90"2732x2048
88.4 %
08/2020
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
460 g7.2 mm10.80"2560x1600
87.8 %
10/2019
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
SD 855, Adreno 640
420 g5.7 mm10.50"2560x1600

Size Comparison

285 mm 185 mm 5.7 mm 575 g280.6 mm 214.9 mm 5.9 mm 641 g246 mm 159 mm 7.2 mm 460 g244.5 mm 159.5 mm 5.7 mm 420 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
873 (750min - 946max) MBit/s +43%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
827 (400min - 880max) MBit/s +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
612 (243min - 690max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
577 (534min - 612max) MBit/s -6%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1065 (1022min - 1104max) MBit/s +69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
679 (600min - 714max) MBit/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
629 (284min - 753max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
612 (573min - 630max) MBit/s -3%
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680720Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø628 (284-753)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø612 (243-690)
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around the pond
Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around the pond
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning around
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning around
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Overview
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Overview
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Cycling around the pond
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Cycling around the pond
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Turning around
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Turning around

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleUltra Wide-angle5X zoomLow-light photography
ColorChecker
4.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus: 5.05 ∆E min: 2.02 - max: 9.23 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus: 47.14 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 93.69 ∆E
OLED flickering: minimum brightness
Minimum brightness
OLED flickering: below 20% brightness
Below 20% brightness
OLED flickering: above 20% brightness
OLED flickering: above 20% brightness
450
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 451 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 446.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.73 cd/m²
iluminação: 98 %
iluminação com acumulador: 441 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.01
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.40
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.90
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.50
Screen
31%
-10%
-5%
Brightness middle
441
625
42%
606
37%
446
1%
Brightness
447
599
34%
579
30%
445
0%
Brightness Distribution
98
87
-11%
89
-9%
86
-12%
Black Level *
0.47
0.32
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.4
1.3
46%
2.9
-21%
2.7
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.1
2.7
34%
6
-46%
5.4
-32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
1.8
38%
4.3
-48%
2.1
28%
Gamma
2.01 109%
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
2.05 107%
CCT
6469 100%
6765 96%
7272 89%
6468 100%
Contrast
1330
1894

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 1 % brightness setting
≤ 1.73 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % (1.73 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
1117 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (950 - 1006, n=6)
979 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
950 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
759 Points -20%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=67, last 2 years)
670 Points -29%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
4712 Points +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (3012 - 3458, n=6)
3243 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
3063 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
2893 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=67, last 2 years)
2377 Points -22%
OpenCL Score 5.1
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3756 Points
Average of class Tablet (452 - 10879, n=15, last 2 years)
2999 Points
Vulkan Score 5.1
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3394 Points
Average of class Tablet (89 - 9073, n=16, last 2 years)
2938 Points
Metal Score 5.1
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
10011 Points
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
4493 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3865 Points
Average of class Tablet (745 - 5713, n=16, last 2 years)
2876 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
13066 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
11885 Points
Average of class Tablet (1418 - 15310, n=16, last 2 years)
8283 Points
Compute RenderScript Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
9279 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8892 Points
Average of class Tablet (2128 - 10799, n=11, last 2 years)
6957 Points
PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (13629 - 19824, n=5)
15404 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
13629 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
11644 Points -15%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
10918 Points -20%
Work 2.0 performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (12355 - 14979, n=6)
13143 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
12466 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
9615 Points -23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8636 Points -31%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
110582 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
109154 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (91762 - 117606, n=5)
102336 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
73307 Points -33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
42861 Points -61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
220422 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
160665 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (128372 - 169103, n=5)
158068 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
107333 Points -33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
64715 Points -60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
51436 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (35563 - 56928, n=5)
46532 Points -10%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
40299 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
34750 Points -32%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
19565 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8272 - 10046, n=6)
8977 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8675 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
6992 Points -19%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4215 Points -51%
Average of class Tablet (507 - 8472, n=19, last 2 years)
2878 Points -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
12725 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (11107 - 14283, n=6)
12559 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
9415 Points -26%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4256 Points -67%
Average of class Tablet (454 - 10759, n=19, last 2 years)
3021 Points -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4104 - 5301, n=6)
4589 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4104 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4056 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
3678 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (863 - 4858, n=19, last 2 years)
2901 Points -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8709 - 10467, n=6)
9355 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8902 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7470 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet (539 - 17675, n=28, last 2 years)
5681 Points -36%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4472 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
13149 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (11617 - 13779, n=6)
12893 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
10119 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (485 - 35165, n=28, last 2 years)
8154 Points -38%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4405 Points -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4178 - 5686, n=6)
4805 Points +15%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4702 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4178 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
3898 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (463 - 6449, n=28, last 2 years)
3683 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (6850 - 7881, n=5)
7346 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
6850 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
5346 Points -22%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4334 Points -37%
Average of class Tablet (361 - 14235, n=50, last 2 years)
2040 Points -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8548 - 9140, n=5)
8924 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8548 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
6128 Points -28%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4425 Points -48%
Average of class Tablet (290 - 24605, n=50, last 2 years)
2153 Points -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4041 - 5318, n=5)
4572 Points +13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4096 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4041 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
3695 Points -9%
Average of class Tablet (858 - 5751, n=50, last 2 years)
2794 Points -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (7369 - 8780, n=6)
8154 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
7369 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
5816 Points -21%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4467 Points -39%
Average of class Tablet (267 - 14235, n=58, last 2 years)
3148 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (9453 - 10442, n=6)
10019 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
9453 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
6750 Points -29%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4356 Points -54%
Average of class Tablet (240 - 24605, n=58, last 2 years)
3723 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4159 - 5751, n=6)
4965 Points +19%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4756 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4159 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
3919 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (441 - 5751, n=58, last 2 years)
3216 Points -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
6226 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4846 - 6977, n=5)
6060 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
4809 Points -23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4036 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet (615 - 4741, n=49, last 2 years)
1765 Points -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8745 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (7613 - 9054, n=5)
8645 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
5819 Points -33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4156 Points -52%
Average of class Tablet (521 - 5731, n=49, last 2 years)
1749 Points -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3658 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
3100 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (1845 - 3875, n=5)
3098 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
2992 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (1671 - 3199, n=49, last 2 years)
2484 Points -20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
116 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (60 - 142, n=5)
110.2 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
60 fps -48%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
60 fps -48%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 120, n=57, last 2 years)
58.2 fps -50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
215 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (171 - 225, n=5)
211 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
166 fps -23%
Average of class Tablet (15 - 873, n=57, last 2 years)
135.6 fps -37%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
135 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (60 - 117, n=5)
80.2 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
67 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
56 fps -16%
Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 120, n=57, last 2 years)
44.7 fps -33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
44 fps -34%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (110 - 134, n=5)
126.4 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
125 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
97 fps -22%
Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 494, n=57, last 2 years)
82.5 fps -34%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
64 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41 - 82, n=5)
56 fps +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
41 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
38 fps -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
34 fps -17%
Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 118.3, n=57, last 2 years)
32.9 fps -20%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (75 - 93, n=5)
88.2 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
88 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
66 fps -25%
Average of class Tablet (5 - 340, n=57, last 2 years)
56.3 fps -36%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
41 fps -53%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (24 - 52, n=5)
36.8 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
24 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
23 fps -4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
21 fps -12%
Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 94.5, n=57, last 2 years)
20.4 fps -15%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (46 - 57, n=5)
53.2 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
53 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
40 fps -25%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
38 fps -28%
Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 214, n=57, last 2 years)
33.4 fps -37%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (18 - 35, n=6)
27.2 fps +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
18 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
16 fps -11%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 97.3, n=68, last 2 years)
14.1 fps -22%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
13 fps -28%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
22 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (22 - 22, n=6)
22 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
17 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
15 fps -32%
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 90, n=68, last 2 years)
13.2 fps -40%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (27 - 54, n=6)
41.5 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
27 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
24 fps -11%
Average of class Tablet (3 - 111, n=68, last 2 years)
20.7 fps -23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
17 fps -37%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
57 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (46 - 59, n=6)
56 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
42 fps -26%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
41 fps -28%
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 279, n=68, last 2 years)
35.4 fps -38%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
751846 Points +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (490260 - 622888, n=4)
571612 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
490260 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
409039 Points -17%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (5305 - 6247, n=4)
5656 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
5305 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
4842 Points -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4738 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=51, last 2 years)
3569 Points -33%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8965 - 9901, n=4)
9264 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8965 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
8360 Points -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8215 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=51, last 2 years)
6449 Points -28%
Memory
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
6751 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (5918 - 8056, n=4)
6654 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
5918 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
5617 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=51, last 2 years)
4229 Points -29%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (11773 - 12048, n=4)
11899 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
11773 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
9372 Points -20%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8775 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=51, last 2 years)
6458 Points -45%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (1268 - 1621, n=4)
1407 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
1268 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
1249 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=51, last 2 years)
1196 Points -6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
1032 Points -19%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 Apple A12Z Bionic, Apple A12Z Bionic GPU, 256 GB NVMe
 
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 990, ARM Mali-G76 MP16, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
126.1 Points +74%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=58, last 2 years)
83.7 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
72.5 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (69.8 - 75.5, n=4)
72.4 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
67 Points -8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
55.1 Points -24%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
271.9 Points +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
127.6 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (121.7 - 131.5, n=4)
127 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
118.1 Points -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
101.2 Points -21%
Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years)
85.4 Points -33%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
140 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
126 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (114 - 126, n=4)
119.8 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=41, last 2 years)
118.7 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
104 Points -17%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
97 Points -23%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
135 runs/min +89%
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=51, last 2 years)
75.2 runs/min +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
71.3 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
66.2 runs/min -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41.2 - 73.3, n=4)
64.2 runs/min -10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
63.9 runs/min -10%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
43057 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
27360 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (25953 - 27360, n=4)
26679 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
24654 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=70, last 2 years)
22748 Points -17%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
19885 Points -27%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=58, last 2 years)
3251 ms * -67%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
2345 ms * -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
2176 ms * -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
1947 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (1854 - 1947, n=4)
1908 ms * +2%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
646 ms * +67%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 PlusHuawei MatePad Pro 10.8Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-20%
19%
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB
1675
1789
7%
1416
-15%
1768 ?(1004 - 2037, n=86)
6%
850 ?(163 - 3414, n=66, last 2 years)
-49%
Sequential Write 256KB
732
399
-45%
522
-29%
1136 ?(452 - 1873, n=86)
55%
535 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=66, last 2 years)
-27%
Random Read 4KB
230.1
224.6
-2%
191.6
-17%
281 ?(173.5 - 543, n=86)
22%
167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=66, last 2 years)
-27%
Random Write 4KB
205
262.4
28%
170.2
-17%
311 ?(197.5 - 499, n=87)
52%
150.6 ?(8.23 - 503, n=66, last 2 years)
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.4 ?(NM Card)
-4%
70.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
75.9 ?(65.6 - 85.8, n=4)
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
69.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.7 ?(NM Card)
3%
54.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-21%
61.9 ?(55.6 - 69.3, n=4)
-11%
PUBG Compare
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.0.0: Ø59.7 (52-60)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 1.0.0: Ø40 (38-41)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus; Armajet; 1.15.1: Ø113.8 (102-120)
Carga Máxima
 32.3 °C32.2 °C24.4 °C 
 24 °C24.7 °C23 °C 
 26.9 °C28.3 °C24.4 °C 
Máximo: 32.3 °C
Médio: 26.7 °C
23.8 °C28 °C27.1 °C
23.8 °C25.6 °C24.5 °C
23.2 °C24.5 °C24.5 °C
Máximo: 28 °C
Médio: 25 °C
alimentação elétrica  22.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.527.62521.324.43118.421.54022.525.35020.332.36315.824.18015.735.110016.741.512515.152.61601564.320010.663.125014.16631510.869.640010.971.450010.575.76308.8768001077100010.178.4125011.177.6160011.977.620001174250012.168.6315012.572.5400012.776.5500013.476.4630013.873.280001567.9100001469.11250014.169.91600014.158SPL24.487.2N0.575.8median 12.5median 72.5Delta25.832.829.726.223.123.319.421.921.12825.219.92319.135.419.946.216.556.119.662.617.560.717.562.413.96413.965.315.870.615.2711469.81470.613.972.913.470.113.865.514.3671469.414.570.314.669.614.563.414.762.915.155.6155714.862.226.5810.852.6median 14.6median 65.31.14.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S7 PlusApple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.09 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.41 / 3.4 / 3.43 Watt
Carga midlight 6.63 / 10.29 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
10090 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
9720 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
7250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh
Power Consumption
-77%
-17%
12%
Idle Minimum *
2.41
1.22
49%
1.98
18%
1.96
19%
Idle Average *
3.4
8.68
-155%
5.66
-66%
2.8
18%
Idle Maximum *
3.43
8.75
-155%
5.69
-66%
2.82
18%
Load Average *
6.63
11.72
-77%
6.96
-5%
5.31
20%
Load Maximum *
10.29
15.25
-48%
6.98
32%
11.91
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
14h 58min
WiFi Websurfing (Samsung Browser 12.1)
7h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 20min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 55min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
10090 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
9720 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
7250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh
Battery Runtime
46%
58%
28%
Reader / Idle
898
1827
103%
1877
109%
1276
42%
H.264
620
738
19%
909
47%
872
41%
WiFi v1.3
425
905
113%
891
110%
556
31%
Load
355
167
-53%
233
-34%
340
-4%

Pro

+ Grande tela OLED de 120 Hz
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ 5G opcional
+ excelente desempenho de sistema e dos jogos
+ USB 3.2 com funcionalidade DP e DeX
+ Quatro alto-falantes com suporte para Dolby Atmos
+ S Pen incluída

Contra

- Wi-Fi 6 instável
- Tela escura
- Duração de bateria medíocre

Veredicto - Tablet poderoso, mas não o top

In review: Samsung Galaxy Tab S7+ (SM-T970). Test device provided courtesy of: NBB.com
In review: Samsung Galaxy Tab S7+ (SM-T970). Test device provided courtesy of: NBB.com

O Samsung Galaxy Tab S7+ é atualmente o maior tablet premium no espaço Android. A tela Super AMOLED de 12,4 polegadas oferece uma excelente reprodução de cores. No entanto, não é suficientemente brilhante para ser utilizada em exteriores. É uma pena que a Samsung não tenha conseguido implementar aqui a sua tecnologia Dynamic AMOLED.

O desempenho do Wi-Fi é muito instável. No entanto, no uso diário, o desempenho nunca cai abaixo de um limite crítico. No entanto, a Samsung deve fazer algumas melhorias aqui. Isto também se aplica às durações da bateria, que são bastante fracas mesmo com brilho mínimo, quando os módulos de comunicação estão habilitados. 

O Samsung Galaxy Tab S7+ é um tablet premium poderoso, adequado para consumo de mídia e uso profissional.

Em seu núcleo, o Tab S7+ é bom. Aqui a Samsung tem feito muito certo. O Tab S7+ possui um SoC muito rápido e sua tela de 120 Hz melhora a experiência do usuário não apenas durante os jogos. A S Pen, incluída na caixa, é uma ferramenta poderosa para fazer anotações, desenhar e fazer apresentações. Além disso, o tablet Android também vem com um modem 5G opcional, o que deve tornar o Tab S7+ apto para o futuro se a Samsung cumprir suas promessas em relação às atualizações de software. 

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - 08/31/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
86 / 98 → 88%
Teclado
72 / 80 → 90%
Mouse
95%
Conectividade
60 / 70 → 85%
Peso
82 / 40-88 → 87%
Bateria
80%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
62 / 78 → 79%
Desempenho da aplicação
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperatura
96%
Ruído
100%
Audio
89 / 91 → 97%
Camera
57 / 85 → 68%
Médio
81%
88%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Finalmente um excelente tablet Android
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-10- 7 (Update: 2020-10-12)